Osarugue Michelle Odemwingie’s Post

View profile for Osarugue Michelle Odemwingie, graphic

Chief Executive Officer at Achievement Network (ANet)

I loved reading Molly Minnick Depasquale and Aneesha Badrinarayan's article on how assessments can support instructional coherence rather than driving a wedge between core instructional elements. Two key points resonated with the shifts we’ve been making at Achievement Network (ANet) to foster a more coherent instructional strategy for our district partners and the students they serve: 1. Background Knowledge Matters! We’ve moved to a strategy of taking students' expected background knowledge into consideration in our ELA assessments. We are now offering assessments compatible with 9 of the most widely used literacy HQIM. As part of our approach, our team considers Next Generation Science Standards, ensuring that literacy instruction builds on students' full breadth of knowledge and that students have access to the content knowledge that supports comprehension. 2. Literacy Instruction Is More Than Comprehension. In partnership with Stanford University's Rapid Online Assessment of Reading, we’re combining foundational literacy data with comprehension insights. This approach is especially crucial for older students who struggle with reading and often face disjointed assessment systems that provide insights not actionable in the secondary context. In a time where classrooms are littered with edtech tools, a volume of assessments and the new wave of AI products and features. How do we ensure that all tools foster instructional coherence and set students up for long-term understanding and success, rather than perpetuating a series of random, disconnected learning events? #K12 #Edtech #Assessments

Why are our instructional systems so incoherent?

Why are our instructional systems so incoherent?

medium.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics