Pixion’s Post

View organization page for Pixion, graphic

432 followers

LLMs RAG chunk size - is it too small and lacks relevant data or is it too large and includes unnecessary information? 🤯 This is where context enrichment comes into a play! 🌟 Instead of worrying about optimizing the chunk size, read Episode 3 of Pixion AI blog series and let our Franjo Mindek show you how to combine the benefits of both chunk sizes in a single solution. ➡️ https://bit.ly/4au7Z04 #PixionAiBlogSeries #LLM #RAG

  • No alternative text description for this image
Godwin Josh

Co-Founder of Altrosyn and DIrector at CDTECH | Inventor | Manufacturer

5mo

The debate over the optimal chunk size in LLMs' RAG framework highlights the delicate balance between relevance and efficiency. Context enrichment indeed presents a promising solution, offering the flexibility to tailor chunk sizes dynamically based on the specific task and dataset. However, how do we address potential challenges such as maintaining coherence across varied chunk sizes and ensuring smooth transitions between them? If we envision a scenario where LLMs are deployed in real-time conversational systems, how would you propose implementing context enrichment techniques to adapt chunk sizes dynamically based on evolving dialogue contexts?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics