Film Industry’s Post

🎬 In the world of filmmaking, I’ve learnt as a producer, the role of a producing partner cannot be overstated. They're not just a colleague; they're the backbone of your creative endeavor, pushing you to be your best and offering invaluable support every step of the way. Together, we navigate the complexities of development to production, ensuring that every detail is meticulously planned and executed. Filmmaking is undeniably a team sport, and the leadership of producers sets the tone for the entire project. With Paul Struthers by my side, I've learned the true essence of collaborative leadership – listening, compromising, and inspiring others to give their all. His unwavering dedication and passion have not only elevated our work but also strengthened our bond as partners. Our partnership goes beyond just sharing tasks; it's about sharing in each other's visions and dreams. His journey from a teenage dreams to now serves as a testament to the power of persistence and belief in oneself. I love that Paul has been identified as a #futureleader at Cannes this year. https://lnkd.in/eEc7u7cw As we embark on this filmmaking journey together, I couldn't be happier or more grateful to have Paul by my side. Our partnership isn't just about making great films; it's about fostering a sense of camaraderie and mutual respect that drives us to achieve greatness. Here's to many more collaborations and shared successes ahead! #Filmmaking #Teamwork

[Top Australian Directors: Success Stories] Directors play a crucial role in the Australian film industry, shaping its success and reputation. This blog post explores the . . . https://lnkd.in/dxR_q9fg

The Oscars' Diversity Challenge: Balancing Historical Accuracy and Inclusivity As an avid cinema lover, I've always believed in the profound impact of cinema on our culture and the way it shapes our perspectives. It's a medium that reflects our diverse world and influences it. Recently, the Oscars introduced new diversity and inclusion regulations slated to take effect in 2024, stirring discussions about their implications, particularly for historical films. An incident involving actor Mads Mikkelsen and his film "The Promised Land" at the Venice Film Festival highlights this complex issue. Mikkelsen and director Nikolaj Arcel faced questions about the lack of diversity in "The Promised Land" and its potential consequences for Oscar eligibility. The film, set in 1750s Denmark, boasts an all-Nordic cast, historically accurate for that era. However, under the new Oscars regulations, films like "The Promised Land" may face disqualification from the Best Picture category due to their lack of visible diversity. Mikkelsen's response was thought-provoking; he challenged the reporter with a question of his own: "Are you worried about it?" This question forces us to confront the intricate balance between diversity and historical accuracy in filmmaking. On one side of the debate, there's a compelling case for diversity in films. Representation matters, it allows audiences to see themselves reflected on screen. The film industry should depict our multifaceted society, providing opportunities for underrepresented communities and enriching storytelling by making films more relatable. However, the situation becomes more complex with historical films. "The Promised Land" portrays 1750s Denmark, an era when racial diversity was nearly nonexistent. Enforcing contemporary diversity standards on such films risks compromising their historical accuracy. The Oscars' new regulations present a dilemma. They signify progress toward inclusivity but raise questions about applying modern standards to historical contexts. A potential solution could involve creating separate categories or recognition for historical films to avoid penalizing them for adhering to historical accuracy. This approach would acknowledge both the importance of diversity and historical authenticity in filmmaking. Please leave your comments below to these questions: How can the film industry balance modern diversity standards with the need for historical accuracy in historical films? Should historical films be judged by the same diversity criteria as contemporary ones, or should there be separate standards? How can the Oscars encourage inclusivity without discouraging historically accurate storytelling? These questions challenge us to think critically about the delicate equilibrium between inclusivity and historical authenticity in film narratives. https://lnkd.in/eCGg-DNN

I had the opportunity to share my thoughts on how the film industry flourishes on 'out of the box' thinking. From the visionary directors to the skilled heads of departments to the audience's endorsement of the film industry- everything challenges the ordinary in the film industry 😊 🙌 Read more about the same in my article published on Indiantelevision.com : https://lnkd.in/gWnEya5k

I can’t echo this loudly enough. There are so many ways in which Hollywood’s current obsession with 9-digit IP-driven tentpole hopefuls is bad for our business but let’s unpack it from an inclusion perspective. It is absolutely TERRIBLE for building a more diverse and inclusive film business. Having worked in a role focused on gate-opening for filmmakers from historically-excluded and under-hired backgrounds for over 3 years now, I can tell you that getting the studio system to say yes to people who haven’t ever directed a feature before is very difficult. The money we spend is real and when you’re a public company, that money is highly scrutinized. While it seems reasonable to be cautious about spending money as safely as you can, the history of the demographics of film directors tells us that if we just hire directors who have already directed studio features as a means of spending money “wisely”, we will hire White male directors 90% of the time. Which is exactly why we have done, year after year, after year, whilst making earnest pledges to do better. It isn’t working. 99% of the directors that Hollywood has ever given a $100m+ film to direct are White men. If that’s 1 of the 15-20 movies you make a year, that could be okay. But when that’s 50% of the movies that get made each year by major studios and each studio is making fewer movies per year, it’s very problematic for progress. At the same time, the most impactful lever on how inclusive a film will become is the identity of the director. Female, BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, and/or disabled directors build more inclusive movies, tell stories about underrepresented communities, hire more diverse people in front of and behind the camera, etc etc etc. This is one of the few places where trickle-down theories actually hold. Now it is *very* hard to convince even the most committed gate-opener to give an untested director $50M+ for a movie. I mean, I probably wouldn’t do it. But $5-10m movies? That’s a more tolerable risk for most studios. Under $5m? Even better. History shows that when we take more shots, we’re more willing to spread it out a bit and that’s how new voices get in. Now it doesn’t happen automatically and this isn’t the post where I share the data that shows that even in lower budget films, Hollywood isn’t hiring nearly enough underrepresented filmmakers. But it’s a critical part of solving the problem. It’s the part I’m most passionate about these days in a few different ways for a few different reasons. Driven, excited, and committed to finding the next Cord and to bet on their great ideas. Let’s go!

Awesome read! To quote Kamala Avila-Salmon thoughts on the article, “Now it is *very* hard to convince even the most committed gate-opener to give an untested director $50M+ for a movie. I mean, I probably wouldn’t do it. But $5-10m movies? That’s a more tolerable risk for most studios. Under $5m? Even better. History shows that when we take more shots, we’re more willing to spread it out a bit and that’s how new voices get in.” We couldn’t agree more. There needs to be a shift and further investment by the major studios toward developing a higher quantity of fresh stories with new voices in the “tolerable risk” range financially. We’re no finance experts, but we do understand that diversifying a stock portfolio is better than having all of your eggs in one basket— *Viewers and critics notice the systemic weakness in the way studios have poured massive amounts of money into low performing franchises and have shied away from engaging in quality films. Proof of concept— Celine Song made her directorial feature debut with “Past Lives.” The budget was $12m and brought in close to $30m at the box office. “American Fiction” was budgeted at $10m and has grossed more than double that domestically. Studios need to take chances and diversify. This is why GDP was founded and where we plan to execute— Quality, fresh, story driven projects in the “tolerable risk”range. It’s a win-win solution for private equity/studios and new storytellers!

Breaking: Academy Awards Adding a "Casting" Category in 2026 https://ift.tt/yD7RlhO The Academy Awards have announced the introduction of a new category for "Casting," set to debut at the 2026 Oscars. This addition marks the inclusion of a competitive Academy Award for achievement in casting, representing the 24th category to be featured in the show. This move is significant as it acknowledges the critical role of casting directors in film production, a profession that has long sought recognition within the Oscars framework. Casting directors play a crucial role in the success of a film, selecting the actors who will bring the characters to life. Their work involves understanding the vision of the director and the script's requirements and then finding the best talent to match those needs. Despite their importance, casting directors have historically been one of the few categories of film professionals not recognized by the Oscars. This new category acknowledges their pivotal role in filmmaking. The addition of a casting category could also encourage more diversity and representation in film. Casting directors who are mindful of bringing diverse talents to the screen might now receive recognition for their efforts to challenge industry norms and promote inclusivity. With the introduction of this category, there may be a ripple effect on how casting is approached in future productions. It could lead to more strategic and thoughtful casting decisions, knowing that there is now prestigious recognition for excellence in this field. Let me know what you think in the comments. Sourced from the Los Angeles Times via No Film School https://ift.tt/zGs2qME February 09, 2024 at 10:03AM

ATTN LEADERS! A lot can be learned about how equity in the workplace drives success based on how this film was made. 👇 I absolutely love the approach the filmmakers took for A24's "Sing Sing" for it's ability achieve success by inspiring those involved to be invested through a community, profit-sharing approach to #filmmaking. I'm sharing this because this model doesn't just to apply to making a movie... Creating ways of working and processes that have tangible, real, and defined outcomes which are equally based on the contributions of all those involved can raise up entire teams to deliver a remarkable outcome. When everybody involved in a project TRULY cares about the outcome, has a legitimate stake in the success and shares in the credit and returns, it not only makes the work itself more enjoyable and efficient, it inspires people to work together with less friction. I've seen this method succeed at different companies and with different projects firsthand throughout my career, so I know for a fact it has merit. ➡️ Do you have any examples to share about how implementing equity in the workplace has driven success? Comment below. #waysofworking #equity #leadership

"Behind every successful film is a team of dedicated professionals - directors, producers, actors, writers, and technicians - who collaborate tirelessly to bring visions to life. Their passion and creativity breathe life into characters and settings, creating worlds that resonate long after the credits roll. But filmmaking is not without its challenges. It demands resilience, resourcefulness, and unwavering determination. From securing funding to navigating creative differences, filmmakers navigate a labyrinth of obstacles on their journey to cinematic excellence. Yet, it is this very journey that fuels their passion and drives them to surpass boundaries, creating masterpieces that endure through generations." R.

Ready to explore the essence of Mumblecore cinema? 🎥🔍 Join us deep diving into this unique and influential film movement. Discover the origins, characteristics, and key themes that define Mumblecore, from its emphasis on naturalistic dialogue to its focus on intimate, character-driven narratives. Explore how Mumblecore filmmakers challenge traditional storytelling conventions and capture the complexities of everyday life on screen. Whether a film enthusiast or simply curious about contemporary cinema, this guide offers valuable insights into the Mumblecore manifesto. #MumblecoreCinema #IndieFilm 🎥🔍 https://lnkd.in/dQ89WWv7