Steve Boehler’s Post

View profile for Steve Boehler, graphic

Founder, Mercer Island Group: Marketing Management Consulting

Is data-driven advertising a costly mirage? Brand Traction Pty Ltd's Jon Bradshaw says it is and he's got the receipts. We recently posted about former UM privacy chief Arielle Garcia's takedown of the "garbage" data broking sector. Bradshaw adds to the argument, challenging the industry to provide proof that data-driven targeting actually makes advertising more effective. He suspects it makes advertising less effective per dollar. In this Mi3Australia editorial, he highlights three deep, recent studies that show: - broad reach beats targeting for incremental growth; - that the cost of targeting outweighs the return; and that - contextual ads massively outperform even first party data Our questions at Mercer Island Group: - does anyone anywhere have actual fully costed (including data and tech fees/costs) split panel, controlled testing that suggests something different? - why is this not a discussion in the US? - why are our trade pubs not covering this? - why am I not hearing about this from our associations? 4A's Association of National Advertisers Agency Management Institute Matthew Bogusz Adam Rattner Neil Smith Les Binet Karen Nelson-Field PhD Peter Field ADWEEK Ad Age

$700bn delusion: Does using data to target specific audiences make advertising more effective? Latest studies suggest not | Mi3

$700bn delusion: Does using data to target specific audiences make advertising more effective? Latest studies suggest not | Mi3

mi-3.com.au

Adam Rattner

Chief Growth Officer | Integrated Marketing | Media Experiences

1mo

This is SUCH an important conversation. It's also why a great media planner is so important. - one that looks at meaningful media touchpoints; - that has no inherent (or financial) bias for one data set or channel over another - that understands the importance of context, content and connection, not just audience profile; - that knows how to analyze true business impact and incrementally; - that understand and transparently shares all costs along the media supply chain; - that includes ALL costs including carbon - that values innovation and white space more than 'proven' short term ROAS Important and increasingly rare. Data is a great tool. But it needs to be understood. And valued for what it can do and its limitation.

Arielle Garcia

Director of Intelligence @ Check My Ads - The Digital Advertising Watchdog | Privacy | Data Ethics | Responsible Media & Tech

1mo

I also would add - to the credit of the US trade press - that it is a discussion state-side; albeit one engaged in predominantly by “anonymous sources” for fear of retribution, and increasingly fraught, given the troubling trend of retraction demands and litigation threats having a chilling effect: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ariellesgarcia_cannes-adtech-accountability-activity-7208950027837128704-PlFJ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios Nevertheless, beyond the trade press, you will enjoy this piece as well: https://therecord.media/junk-inferences-data-brokers

This is the most important subject in marketing today. Period.

Well, it works if they were going to buy it anyway. Sort of advertising as a to-do list.

John Condon

Founder and Chief Creative Officer of The Distillery Project, a Chicago based 4-time AdAge Small Agency of The Year.

1mo

The data is only as valuable as the insights derived from it.

Steve Bullock

Founder, Principal Strategist @ FASTFORWARD Consulting. Freelance Brand Builder / Creative Translator / Growth Accelerator. Ex-Ogilvy, TM/McCann & Tombras Group.

1mo

It can be. EVERYthing is data now. Obviously, it depends on the platform, kind of data, etc. At minimum, it def lets us make messaging/content more personal. So, perhaps it's not how essential data is, but how expertly the right "information" is applied.

Like
Reply
Tim Maleeny

Chief Strategy & Innovation Officer | Board Member | Novelist | Mentor

1mo

Great post, Steve Boehler! As you know, the data obsession has been around for more than a decade, so seductive because numbers help anxious agencies and nervous clients feel like marketing is a science, and let's face it, there is so much money invested in data now—entire agencies reconfigured around their data story—that everyone is afraid to say the emperor has no clothes, or simply say, hey, we can do better. (The notion that contextual ads massively outperform first party data, for example, should be intuitive from a creative and human behavior standpoint. But that's not what's being sold at scale.) Thanks for calling attention to this; as the inimitable Toby Barlow points out, this is the topic we should all be discussing right now.

Beth Seitzberg

Creative director with an EMBA | Insight, intelligent creative and unrelenting curiosity to solve your business and marketing problems. | Creative & Technical Director at cat&tonic

1mo

I know some of us are talking about it, have been talking about it, if somewhat quietly. John Condon said it first here, but it's the insights that matter. And, I would add, how the insights are applied. Depending solely on data (or on targeting criteria) for success has always been a terrible idea, but no clients want to hear that, and "data-driven" is so, so much slicker and easy to sell.

Arielle Garcia

Director of Intelligence @ Check My Ads - The Digital Advertising Watchdog | Privacy | Data Ethics | Responsible Media & Tech

1mo

As to why trade bodies are silent, they are plagued by the same conflicts of interest as the balance of the ecosystem. See, e.g. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ariellesgarcia_transparency-adtech-ethics-activity-7207130050566012929-Q5PG?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

  • No alternative text description for this image
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics