Who is responsible for carbon in buildings? Owners? Engineers? Developers? Architects? Contractors? The answer? All of the above. Carbon emissions are an industry problem, but one we all need to take responsibility for. As architects, we lead the design process. Leading means setting the tone, demanding change, and educating others. Let's step up and push the industry in the right direction. If you missed this issue of the Carbon Architect - check out the link in the comments. _______________________ If you like my content give me a follow and hit the bell. I post Monday - Saturday @ 6:15am PST. #architecture #design #engineering #carbon #responsibility
Developers/owners have financial control over the design, but the architect has operational control over the design. Owners make final decisions based on money and risk, but you are wise to point out that you should never underestimate the impact a designer can have. All things being equal, everyone wants a better world.
My perspective: while everyone on the team contributes, owners are ultimately responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions of their building (all scopes 1-3). It is on the design team to accurately represent the global warming potential of the building. This extends to the usage of technologies like CarbonCure, which sells its carbon sequestration as a third party offset. That means the building technically does not get and cannot claim the environmental benefit of that technology. Same goes for any installed PV system that is receiving RECs to offset cost.
Absolutely agree! As architects, we wield considerable influence in shaping the carbon footprint of buildings. While owners, engineers, developers, and contractors all play pivotal roles, it's our duty to lead the design process responsibly. Design isn't just about aesthetics; it's a powerful tool for sustainability. Let's champion change, demand eco-friendly solutions, and educate stakeholders. Excited to dive deeper into this topic – check out 'The Carbon Architect' now. Thanks for shedding light on a crucial aspect of our industry! 🌿🏗️
Excellent infographic, Steven Biersteker! Thanks for sharing
In my country, Turkey, owners don't want to apply sustainability principles due to initial costs. We see LEED-standard buildings in prestigious projects, mostly because they want to put a LEED label and attract customers. The correct mindset behind sustainable buildings should be explained and taught by architects.
Carbon emissions are a political problem (and a tool for control). Responsibility lies on climate activists in all sectors. "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." (c)
Definitely a shared responsibility! Architects have a pivotal role in steering the industry towards sustainability. It's a collaborative effort across all fields - from owners to contractors. It's great to see this call for action. How do you think each role can contribute more effectively to reducing carbon emissions? Checking out the Carbon Architect for more insights!
Architects have the potential and duty to tame money and educate, steer decision makers.
I totally agree. It is time for us to take responsibility for the part that corresponds, with commitment and seriousness.
COO | 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁 | 𝗗𝗲𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿, 𝗖𝗢 | 𝗝𝘂𝗹 𝟯𝟭 - 𝗔𝘂𝗴 𝟮
8moWhat role does government play in this? I'm never thrilled to see more regulation, but where the free market is failing, IE the climate, it could be the case for a nudge in the other direction. Maybe we leave the stick at home and offer some carrots? Some incentives for carbon smart projects off the top of my head: Tax incentives Parking requirement reductions Increased density Infrastructure assistance Priority entitlement process Just my .02