Someone will no doubt bring out the old saw that news was never intended to be a revenue-making division and was supposed to be a public service. Sorry, but that's bull. Newspapers since time immemorial were in it to profit. I think it was Canadian media baron Roy Thompson who once suggested that having radio stations was like having a license to print money. Yes, of course, we need news and responsible news at that. The model is broken not simply because of corporate greed, but because those IN media -- managing editors, producers, even reporters -- didn't fight for the RELEVANCE of news. News people and their culture still don't know how to evolve, except to adopt new shiny toys while keeping the same dumb ways of supposedly telling a story and the same ideas of what "news" is.
When I turn on local CTV News or Global at 6 pm, I get BS stories about traffic accidents off the top. You use this footage because you have the video, but that somehow makes it the most important story for your lead? Really? Please. 🙄 And how many reporters are given the actual TIME to do an investigation that may mean not filing for that day, justifying their existence, but whose final result could stun Canadians, prompt government inquiry and possibly spur changes in legislation? Instead, TV outlets take the cheap way out and swipe from their newspaper colleagues, who also face shrinking resources.
The answer waits with the courage of new thinking. But I won't hold my breath.
Retired, still looking for deals
1moMedia has to rely on technology, whether it is print or electronic. There will always be breakdowns.