The Andrew W. Marshall Foundation’s Post

Excellent book on Lincoln's leadership of the war effort, his management of politics, narrative, and perception, and his interaction with his senior brass. I am not usually that keen on US history (I know...!), but this was a great read. Highly recommended! One thing that comes out quite clearly is that any "one-word answer" to the question of "what the civil war was about" will at best mislead. You have to go deeper into the history, on its own merits, and not as a way of scoring points in the polemics of our day. https://lnkd.in/eYQeFi-Q

A compelling and insightful account of the military genius and strategic brilliance of one of America's most revered figures, General George Washington. With meticulous research and a captivating narrative style, Fleming brings to light the often overlooked tactics and decisions that ultimately led to the triumph of the American Revolution. Fleming's book offers a refreshing perspective on Washington's leadership and sheds light on his innovative strategies. The author skillfully dismantles the popular notion that Washington's victories were solely a result of luck or divine intervention, instead emphasizing the meticulous planning and calculated risks taken by the general. By carefully analyzing key battles such as Trenton, Princeton, and Saratoga, Fleming reveals the brilliance behind Washington's military maneuvers, highlighting his ability to exploit weaknesses in the British army and turn the tide of the war. Fleming provides a clear and concise analysis of the key battles, explaining the significance of each move and its impact on the overall war effort. Additionally, Fleming masterfully weaves together historical context, personal anecdotes, and quotes from primary sources, creating a well-rounded and engaging narrative. "The Strategy of Victory" is a must-read for anyone interested in American history or military strategy. Fleming's impeccable research and skillful storytelling make for a thoroughly enjoyable and informative reading experience. By highlighting Washington's strategic brilliance, the book offers a fresh perspective on the American Revolution and solidifies General George Washington's rightful place as a military genius and the savior of the fledgling nation.

As we close out the first quarter, I wanted to share a list of the books I've had the pleasure of reading so far in 2024 Maybe there is a title, topic or author you might also find interesting or useful. 1. The Bible: Currently I'm reading in 1st Chronicles. In my 30's I began to try to read 3 to 4 chapters in the Bible a day. In so doing, someone can typically read through the Bible in one year. 2. The American Way of War: A History of United State Military Strategy and Policy by Russell F Wiegley (started in December 2023) 3. Lincoln's Mentors: The Education Of A Leader by Michael J Gerhardt 4. Embattled Rebel: Jefferson Davis and the Confederate Civil War by James McPherson 5. America's First Clash with Iran: The Tanker War 1987-88 by Lee Allen Zatarain 6. D.L. Moody On The Ten Commandments by Dwight Lyman Moody 7. Lennon, Dylan, Alice and Jesus: The Spiritual Biography of Rock N Roll by Greg Laurie 8. Lessons from the Mouse: A Guide for Applying Disney World's Secrets of Success to Your Organization, Your Career, and Your Life by Dennis Snow 9. Leadership In War: Essential Lessons From Those Who Made History by Andrew Roberts 10. The Churchill Factor: How One Man Made history by former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson 11 Legitimacy and Force: National and International Dimensions by Jeane J. Kirkpatrick 12. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force and Society Since 1000 A.D. by William McNeill 13. The Unexpected President: The life and Times of Chester Arthur by Scott Greenberger 14. Impeached: The Trial of Andrew Johnson and The Fight for Lincoln's Legacy by David O Stewart Currently Reading: 3 books 1. The Bible: I'm currently reading in 1st Chronicles 2. Grant by Ron Chernow 3. Between War and Peace: How America Ends Its Wars by Matthew Moten

14 President's BEFORE George Washington Before George Washington, there were 14 presidents who served the Continental Congress. These presidents were not presidents of the United States, as the United States Constitution had not yet been ratified. Their roles were more akin to that of a chairman or speaker, presiding over the Congress during the American Revolution. Here is a list of the 14 presidents before George Washington: 1. Peyton Randolph 2. Henry Middleton 3. John Hancock 4. Henry Laurens 5. John Jay 6. Samuel Huntington 7. Thomas McKean 8. John Hanson 9. Elias Boudinot 10. Thomas Mifflin 11. Richard Henry Lee 12. John Hancock (second term) 13. Nathaniel Gorham 14. Arthur St. Clair These men played a crucial role in the formation of the United States, presiding over the Continental Congress during the Revolutionary War and the early years of the nation’s history. However, their roles were distinct from the presidency of the United States, which began with George Washington in 1789.

Explore the rich history and commitment to quality in our latest blog. Read now https://bit.ly/4c4kHnE

https://lnkd.in/dRcUjEnw worst president in us history Assessing the "worst" president in U.S. history is subjective and can depend on individual perspectives and opinions. Different people may prioritize different criteria when evaluating presidential performance, including policies, leadership style, response to crises, and personal integrity. It's important to note that historical assessments of presidents can evolve over time as new information emerges and societal values change. That said, a few presidents are often mentioned in discussions about the "worst" presidents: James Buchanan (1857-1861): Buchanan is often criticized for his handling of the growing tensions between the North and South leading up to the Civil War. Many historians argue that his failure to take decisive action to prevent secession or address the issue of slavery contributed to the nation's descent into conflict. Andrew Johnson (1865-1869): Johnson faced significant challenges as president after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and during the early years of Reconstruction. His lenient approach toward Southern states and opposition to civil rights for freed slaves led to tensions with Congress and contributed to a difficult period of Reconstruction. Warren G. Harding (1921-1923): Harding's presidency was marred by scandals, including the infamous Teapot Dome scandal, which involved corruption in the leasing of federal oil reserves. Although it's debated how much he was personally involved, his administration is often associated with corruption and cronyism.

Thanks Readers Favorite for the 5 Star review! America fought her wars of independence and established herself as a global power to be respected, but recent occurrences cast aspersions on that reputation. The breakout of several skirmishes around the globe has put a lot of concerned parties on edge as they attempt to prevent what many fear can only be the opening salvo of World War 3. Now, more than ever, the rest of the world is looking to America to provide leadership. Our leaders may seem lacking in inspiration, but some believe they need not look further than our storied past. Richard V. Battle has collated the achievements of a select group of individuals worthy of emulation who stood up for justice when the need arose. AmeriCANS Who Made America is that inspirational collection. Richard V. Battle’s exceptional collection displays all the ḩallmarks of extensive research and excellent documentation. He discusses each individual in clear and straightforward tones, highlighting what they are popularly known for and other lesser-known events in their lives. He does an impressive job of humanizing these great men and women by placing equal emphasis on their good deeds and their perceived failings. One remarkable aspect is the extent to which he widens his search to provide a balanced set of individuals, analyzing the efforts of male and female actors and the different races that played a part in forming the America we have today. He not only focuses on individuals involved in military conquests; he goes so far as to include artists, captains of industry, and even spies, showing the importance of every facet of society in developing a better future. In times like these, when the American people struggle to find inspiration in the search for answers, AmeriCANS Who Made America, with its symbolic imagery and abundance of well-placed quotes, can provide that and more.  Reviewed by Essien Asian for Readers’ Favorite bit.ly/3Xf6uPF

I spent much of Saturday at Kennesaw State University's Center for the Study of the Civil War Era attending its 21st Annual Symposium. Pictured below is keynote speaker Steven E. Woodworth who is an historian, author, and Professor at Texas Christian University. Sometimes these events are rather dry, rehash already established facts, and don't tell me much I already didn't know. But that wasn't the case today as Woodworth set forth a unique theory (completely new to me) regarding the tactics of Union General Ulysses S. Grant. Grant was quite aware of the Union's numeric superiority in terms of soldiers and resources. Making use of that advantage, Grant fought a war of attrition with Confederate General Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia beginning in 1864 knowing the Army of the Potomac would ultimately prevail. Woodworth proposed that was done to placate President Abraham Lincoln whose knowledge of military tactics was largely limited to Napoleonic warfare. Woodworth proposed Lincoln believed the only route to Union victory was annihilation of the South's armies as exemplified by Napoleon's triumph at the Battle of Austerlitz. In contrast, Grant and his protege General William Tecumseh Sherman understood modern warfare, modern armies and their decentralized components making annihilation difficult, and the integral role economies and supply lines played in such. Examples of modern warfare tactics would be Grant's victory at Vicksburg not won with a suicidal frontal assault but isolating and starving the city's garrison into surrender. As to Sherman, the entire Atlanta Campaign and March to the Sea was designed to break the back of the Southern economy and the Confederacy's ability and will to continue making war. Why then would Grant placate Lincoln's outdated notion for victory only attainable through grinding Lee and his army into dust? As any historian will tell you, being a military leader requires political skill whether you are General Washington, Grant, or Eisenhower. And that's because in a democracy with civilian control of the military, elected politicians ultimately call the shots.

“Vividly written, well-researched contributions by first-class scholars make the story of the early U.S. more complete, interesting, and revealing.” Early review of A Republic of Scoundrels for which I wrote a chapter. https://lnkd.in/gyUDVWeb

My first published historical work is now out. The "Lost War for Texas" is published by Texas A&M University Press. It's the forgotten story of Texas' FIRST revolution, the one no one knows about, that occurred from 1811-13. It's the Mexican Revolution from Spain, but the "Mexican Revolutionary Army of the North" was a mix of Tejanos and Anglo-Americans fighting side-by-side FOR Mexican Independence 24 years before the Alamo. If you think you know Texas history, but don't know this story, you don't know Texas history, and if you want to discuss or debate about the revolution of 1836, you can't do it without knowing about the revolution of 1811. Please buy it at Amazon or directly from the publisher, Texas A&M University Press. https://lnkd.in/gwjEtc7Y