Guidelines for future-ready design research. This can also inform how we can create a future-ready venture as an artifact. 💡 L.G. Pee, Shan L. Pan, Jingyuan Wang & Junjie Wu (2021) Designing for the future in the age of pandemics: a future-ready design research (FRDR) process, European Journal of Information Systems, 30:2, 157-175, DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1863751
Ufuk Gür, Ph.D.’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Founder & Director delaO design studio / PhD Design Research Candidate RMIT/ Full Time Design Professor Tec de Monterrey
Every design scholar should watch this video:
What does “design research” mean?
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Research on Universal Design: my recently published article has reached a little milestone, 20 reads after a comparatively short time, according to Researchgate. https://lnkd.in/djcA5egB ... is where it can be found. What did I learn from this work? What can designers use? The lesson for me was that designers need to be really conscious of the design tools they use and the kind of data they want to collect. It seems a bit banal (it is) but also true that a lof of the time we´re using the same tools and therefore getting the same kind of data from them. Bevica Fonden DSKD #design #universaldesign #inclusivedesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Product Designer | UX/UI Designer | Interaction Designer | UX Research & AI Enthusiast | and Spoken Word
Learnt new research methods that are very effective today, and i think are also great for conducting heuristic evaluation. An example is the 5E’s. I won’t bore anyone, if you are interested, I recommend you check this course out. Just finished "Learning Design Research" by Peni Acayo, and Andy Schwanbeck! Check it out: https://lnkd.in/ecKP4NQG #designresearch.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I recently finished the course “Learning Design Research” by Peni Acayo and Andy Schwanbeck! Very insightful, I recommend you check it out if you have the time. https://lnkd.in/ed8g9aA4 #designresearch.
Certificate of Completion
linkedin.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Thinking Outside the Box: How Designers and Non-Designers Approach Inspiration Differently Coming up with creative solutions often involves finding inspiration in unexpected places. han lu; 孙钢; 徐静妤; Su, Pujie; Tang, Xingyue, and Zhang Yajing from Tongji University explore how designers and non-designers approach the concept of "analogical source selection" during the collaborative design process (ICED23 Proceedings). https://lnkd.in/gtWciaSC Join the "Design is a Team Sport" movement at ICED25 Dallas. How can we encourage interdisciplinary collaboration in the design field? What are the benefits and challenges of working with teams that have diverse backgrounds? Share your thoughts on the importance of finding inspiration from outside your own field! Don't miss out! · Register for ICED25 Dallas: iced.designsociety.org/ The University of Texas at Dallas, The Design Society #DesignThinking #Collaboration #Innovation #AnalogicalDesign #Interdisciplinary #CreativeProcess
DIFFERENCES IN ANALOGICAL SOURCE SELECTIONS BETWEEN DESIGNERS AND NON-DESIGNERS DURING THE COLLABORATIVE ANALOGICAL DESIGN PROCESS | Proceedings of the Design Society | Cambridge Core
cambridge.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
SenseMaker, Author, KeyNote Speaker, Advisor, CoFounder, HUMANTIFIC, CoFounder: NextDesign Leadership Network
NextD Journal: ISLANDS OF COHERENCE: How We Make Sense of Don Norman’s Making Sense of Design: Weekend reading for those who might have missed this earlier.. Embracing Community Complexities Parts 1 & 2: Welcome back NextD Journal readers. This week, a different kind of adventure in two parts. Since we have invested in helping to make sense of several complicated subjects over the years, we greatly appreciate all attempts at sensemaking within the design community, around the topics of design / design thinking / rethinking design. With that appreciation in mind we took a look at the recently published Don Norman video; "The Role of Design". https://lnkd.in/eJQGFhU4 Design for Complexity Group / Join here: https://lnkd.in/dBNmiHq
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Just finished the course “Learning Design Research” by Peni Acayo and Andy Schwanbeck! I highly recommend checking it out; it's an excellent way to strengthen your knowledge.https://https://lnkd.in/eS7u3Suz #designresearch.
Certificate of Completion
linkedin.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Design, Innovation & Futures | Co-Founder of the Patadesign School | PhD in Design from Umeå Institute of Design
(In what way has Design Research failed in the last 50 years?) DEC 2 ☃️ ANNE GALLOWAY: "It still believes that human interests are more important than anything else." * * * * * Design Research Failures is an open-ended conversation with contributors responding to one single question: "In what way has Design Research failed in the last 50 years?" It is intended as a critical, constructive hinge between past and future, vocalizing how Design Research has failed and, conversely, how it might succeed looking ahead. After a period of offline hibernation, the project is now not only back online for some months, but will also run as a Christmas calendar here on LinkedIn, paying tribute to some of the incredible contributions that have been made to date. For more info, incl. full project credits, a sea of further contributions, and a form for sharing your own response, check out: https://lnkd.in/dd2qyydA #designresearchfailures
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Here's the thing: AI is powerful, but it can't replace human curiosity (ok, yet). Our AI tools are driving us towards an Age of Average (see link). Qualitative research and deep customer insights are what will set you apart. https://lnkd.in/dgEykwCC
How might we better visualize complexity and systemic challenges? Mapping our thoughts could offer an alternative perspective. Two months ago, I delved into the editorial design collection "Explorers: Thoughts on Mapping in Design Research" published by Stby and edited by Megan Anderson and Geke van Dijk, finding a wealth of insights on mapping invisible callenges, system of systems, sensory mapping, and even speculative mapping in policymaking within social structures. For example, Michael Pierre Johnson and Megan Anderson highlighted the concept of bringing boundaries through mapping (P28), leveraging "design artifact" with the notion of a "boundary object," initially proposed by Star and Griesemer (1989) to facilitate cooperation among teams from diverse backgrounds without necessarily reaching a consensus. Jesse Grimes (P19) shared his perspectives on conveying the complexity of services through visualizing the "service ecosystem." Jesse also offered clear instructions and informative visuals on how we can create our own service ecosystem. These profound insights, coupled with concrete examples, inspired me and prompted me to explore the experimental application of the boundary objects theory to examine our built environment and human behavior through the lens of Design for Longevity (D4L). Using boundary objects for enhanced design perspectives and insights: https://lnkd.in/g5FDM5Fr More books and inspiration: https://lnkd.in/eCskR5yE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I just ran across this fascinating post by #ShengHungLee on mapping complexity and systemic challenges, and the insights he obtained applying boundary object theory to maps in real-world service environments. I was struck by the potential mapping had for complexity, but also by the potential for the process and the result to exclude those who are not involved. A good reminder why we keep expanding our design toolboxes, and choose our approaches and tools mindfully. I'll finish with two recommendations : 1. Read the comments on Sheng-Hung Lee's post. You won't be disappointed! 2. Read Sheng-Hung Lee's article on boundary objects (linked in the post). He makes some very intriuiging observations about how boundary objects--like maps--can bring together diverse groups, and that's just the beginning. As for me, I'm adding #ExplorersThoughtsOnMappingInDesignResearch to my ever-expanding booklist.😉 #MappingComplexity #BoundaryObjectTheory #DesignTools
How might we better visualize complexity and systemic challenges? Mapping our thoughts could offer an alternative perspective. Two months ago, I delved into the editorial design collection "Explorers: Thoughts on Mapping in Design Research" published by Stby and edited by Megan Anderson and Geke van Dijk, finding a wealth of insights on mapping invisible callenges, system of systems, sensory mapping, and even speculative mapping in policymaking within social structures. For example, Michael Pierre Johnson and Megan Anderson highlighted the concept of bringing boundaries through mapping (P28), leveraging "design artifact" with the notion of a "boundary object," initially proposed by Star and Griesemer (1989) to facilitate cooperation among teams from diverse backgrounds without necessarily reaching a consensus. Jesse Grimes (P19) shared his perspectives on conveying the complexity of services through visualizing the "service ecosystem." Jesse also offered clear instructions and informative visuals on how we can create our own service ecosystem. These profound insights, coupled with concrete examples, inspired me and prompted me to explore the experimental application of the boundary objects theory to examine our built environment and human behavior through the lens of Design for Longevity (D4L). Using boundary objects for enhanced design perspectives and insights: https://lnkd.in/g5FDM5Fr More books and inspiration: https://lnkd.in/eCskR5yE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-