Water & Music’s Post

Water & Music reposted this

View profile for Cherie Hu, graphic
Cherie Hu Cherie Hu is an Influencer

Music-tech researcher, founder, and educator

Just published my own analysis on the significance of Suno's $125M funding round for music-tech, exclusively for Water & Music members. A lot of takes on Suno's $125M round emphasize how the company has virtually no official endorsement from the music industry, and is likely trained on copyrighted data. While these are critical factors to consider and I do mention these points in my analysis, I decided to put things in perspective, and focus instead on the history of music-tech startup funding at large — and why Suno represents a watershed moment in the evolution of this category. Suno's round is not only the largest investment ever in a music AI startup, but is also one of only four music-tech mega-rounds ($100M+) to take place after 2018. In contrast, 16 music-tech mega-rounds took place from 2010–2018, focused primarily on music streaming and consumer hardware companies (Spotify, SoundCloud, Sonos, Beats, etc.). The music-tech market has since cooled down significantly, due to a mix of factors such as the COVID pandemic, slowing growth in subscription streaming revenue, industry consolidation, costly music licensing fees, and uncertain macroeconomic conditions. Suno's round is the latest milestone in a new era of investment in the category, focused on areas ripe for disruption beyond traditional music streaming and consumption models (think live events, social video/UGC, fandom, and, in this case, artistry itself). Read my full analysis below — curious to hear your thoughts! #musicbiz #musictech #ai #musicai #aimusic #musicindustry #musicbusiness #suno

Suno's $125M round highlights historic shift in music-tech investment

Suno's $125M round highlights historic shift in music-tech investment

waterandmusic.com

Ivo Dimchev

CEO at Stereofox • Senior Product Manager at 8fit GmbH

3mo

To me, it seems like another jump on the hype bandwagon. Every year we have a new trend where VCs rush to throw in some money and the reality is that (as someone else mentioned here) there will be a lot of disappointed people in 1-2 years time. This time, however, even more immature than usual (for VCs). Disregarding the ethical issues around the existence of this product and the unclear source of data on which the model has been trained is off-putting.

Dae Bogan

Head of Third-Party Partnerships at The Mechanical Licensing Collective | Lecturer at UCLA Herb Alpert School of Music | Maestro of Metadata Bizzy Award Recipient | Billboard Digital Power Player

2mo

I wrote a piece 10yrs ago & every word rings true today: "Putting lawsuits aside, it is important to understand the IP implications early on as it does affect your bottom line. Not taking into account the royalty payout requirements for the various licenses you’d need means your profit projections will be dramatically skewed (which doesn’t make for happy investors). I strongly recommend that anyone considering launching a music tech startup (or a startup that incidentally uses music, such as any video platform that allows UGC or a website with music as a complement to the core product offering) consult an IP attorney or at least a music business consultant who understands IP as it relates to new and emerging business models, like the author. Lastly, founders should consider the fact that the music tech companies who many aim to imitate have been beat into submission, sued into extinction, or raped of equity over the years. Napster, Youtube, Grooveshark, Myspace, Limewire, ReDigi, Veoh, iMeem, Vevo, Spotify, Thumbplay, Songbird, and many lost souls who’ve you’ve never heard about have all faced the big music machine. For those big enough to kick and fight, they may prolong the inevitable, all while not turning a profit—Pandora."

Derek Hoiem

leadership.ux.design.creatoreconomy.xr.

3mo

Yes, excited to read. I'm not excited about companies running ahead for the dollars on artists backs. There's a right way to do this, and artists don't have to lose. Do a proof of concept, raise the money, pay artists with opt-in, train the models, and everyone's happy.

Boris Mihov

Product Lead building digital products for 17+ years. Product Management, Strategy, Design, Development, People Management. Head of Product / Director / CPO / Founder. 0 to 1 in B2B, B2C.

3mo

I'm not seeing it Cherie Hu. Don't be fooled by the investment amount, it's just costly to run any gen AI platform. Full thoughts: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/borismihov_suno-raises-125m-to-become-the-chatgpt-activity-7199098886576078848-WoPX?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

David Baird

Founder/CEO, Gigmor.

3mo

Music creation and distribution have always reaped the lion’s share of investments. Totally agree: Live events and fandom are next!

John Gaenzler

Co-Founder at ArtistVerified. Music Producer. Advisor. Proud Dad.

3mo

Lots of naive investors out there who will be very disappointed in a matter of 18-24 months. They are very misguided to believe people will pay for this service.

Like
Reply

Great share. Look forward to digging in.

Like
Reply
Chase Baker

Content Design Lead at Meta | Creators | Music & Audio Product UX

3mo

Saying the quiet part loud at the end of the article! But really that’s Suno’s “statement” for the time being.

Like
Reply
John Lucchetti

Music Marketing Strategist | Utah Video Production | Entertainment Project Development

3mo

Great work as always. I just ordered a Water & Music shirt.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics