Zaharo Tsekouras’ Post

View profile for Zaharo Tsekouras, graphic

Placing world-class Chiefs of Staff for the C-suite

“I need smart doers, not smart thinkers” - a seed stage founder I spoke to yesterday🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️ What set them off is Chief of Staff candidates who lead with their strategy experience. The perception is that whiteboarding, brainstorming, and planning skills associated with strategy roles aren’t the most desireable skills for a CoS at an early-stage startup. What’s way, way more important is your ability to execute well at lightning speed. Outcomes. Attitude. Hunger. BTW you’re probably not providing thought partnership or strategy advisory until Series B or later, and even then it’s usually not a core aspect of your role. My advice is to literally not even mention strategy in an interview at an early-stage startup because not only is it unimpressive, it can actually be perceived by some founders as a negative signal. #chiefofstaff #recruiting

Lauren M Taylor

Operations | Investor Relations | Leadership & Team Development | Delivering Outsized Results in Dynamic Startups | Passionate About Innovation and BIG Impact

1mo

Hmmm. I think this is an interesting perspective and maybe it's semantic but I think strategy is even more important for early stage startups because they have to make their limited resources go even further. For instance, a CoS at the early stage would recognize that person X and person Y are working on projects that, if combined, could be worth more than the sum of their parts. Or when person A is blocked, they know that person B came up with a solution last week that, if tweaked, could apply to person A's challenge too. Plus, this isn't their first rodeo, so they know what to expect and how to do things today that set us up for success tomorrow. I think of all of this as strategy that really benefits folks at an early stage. Am I defining 'strategy' or 'early stage' differently? Open to other ideas!

Melissa Bloom, Ed.D.

Simplifying Growth & Complexity for Ambitious Leaders | Fractional C-Level Expertise | Founder @ Expanse Strategists LLC

1mo

I realize your post may be off-putting to some, but you are 100% accurate and so are the founders. Most founders are visionaries and they need operators to get things done, especially in the early stages. Adding additional visionaries and processors too soon slows things down. The time for additional visionaries is when, as you put it, the company is growing and expanding, requiring strategy at multiple levels.

L. Isabelle Nichols

Principal, DFO Management, LLC

1mo

Strategy has been so bastardized as a word as to mean nothing, the way "entrepreneurial" was for a while / is still - so if a candidate uses either word, I ask them to give me their definition and tell me what they mean. Too often, as you point out, strategic can mean "not accountable for success or failure of implementation" just as "entrepreneurial" means "follows their own genius vs listens to experience of others and falls back on a safety net." Strategy without practicality is useless, as is entrepreneurialism without humility and risk.

Sydney (Archer) Gorski

Chief of Staff | Recovering Control Freak | Glue Person

1mo

Thank you so much for putting this into words! I just went through a title change (VP of Biz Ops to CoS) for this exact reason. When my company (seed-stage, high growth energy/AI tech startup) started using EOS, I became our “integrator”. I was great at leading our meetings, executing projects, and being the “glue” between teams but definitely fell short in what was expected of me in terms of setting and executing our strategy. My CEO/Founder and I had a super honest convo and realized that realistically, he was the only person at the company who should be setting our strategy right now.

Barry Hurd

Fractional Chief Digital Officer. Data & Intelligence. (CDO, CMO, CINO) - Investor, Board Member, Speaker

1mo

Is a seed stage founder really at the point they need a Chief of Staff? If they need to hire a COS at the seed stage they should probably be really considering finding a strong/smart thinker who can get it done and bring them on as a co-founder to get a stable funding/fulfillment/revenue process underway.

Zayd Syed Ali

Founder & CEO, Valley | The Outbound Tool to Send Less Outbound

1mo

Couldn’t agree more. I see this a lot with MBAs coming to interview at Valley. Incredibly smart - HBS, Yale, Columbia, Duke. Smarter than me - no doubt. But a lot of strategy talk. I care about tactical 30-60-90 execution plans. Clear and incisive execution eats strategy for breakfast (at least at this stage).

Your client is spot on (as is your recommendation)! Though it is difficult for humble workers to express accomplishments without accidentally lumping them into 'strategy'. CoS roles are execution roles and should be carrying the water for the CEO, the person who gets s**t done. However, humble guys see getting it done as just doing the job - though it might be considered extra-ordinary......I continue to find it hard to create the humble brag!

Roman Wolff

Senior Vice President Manufacturing and Engineering at Origin Materials

1mo

Zaharo Tsekouras the general concept is good for all companies. I would replace the concept of Strategy with Planning. What you need is the long direction, processes (only enough to do things right and effectively), get sh*t done. Also micromanaging gets as much in the way as excess planning (they tend to go hand in hand, one by the leader and one by the doer)

Danny Groner

Fixing what ails consumer businesses

1mo

Very well put. Gotta hunt for a role via the growth stage the business is at, anticipating their needs, directing your work to match. "BTW you’re probably not providing thought partnership or strategy advisory until Series B or later, and even then it’s usually not a core aspect of your role." Right on.

Amy Omobono (Baker)

Passionate Leader | Global Relationship Builder | Problem "Fixer" | Retention & Revenue Driver | Human Approach

1mo

GSD’r!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics