Is TIME just a publisher or something more? Our own Felix Danczak explored this topic as well as the impact of TIME's paywall removal a year ago with Mark Stenberg of ADWEEK: https://bit.ly/3VIDz4r
Zuora’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In the radical autocratic minority rule ethos of today's Republican political and judicial philosophy, voting is a privilege to be granted to those who will help keep minority rule in power. Some reasonable measure of free, inclusive and expansive voting has been the benchmark of expanding American democracy. Reducing and imposing a form of privilege on the right to vote serves to take America back to days when the select few determined the power to rule. The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What's next for voters? #Kansas #Votingrights #Statesupremecourt The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What's next for voters? https://lnkd.in/eFu_bAD2
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
SCOTUS threw out a pair of judicial decisions involving challenges to Republican-backed laws in Florida and Texas designed to restrict the power of social media companies to curb content that the platforms deem objectionable. The justices directed lower appeals courts to reconsider their decisions regarding these 2021 laws authorizing the states to regulate the content-moderation practices of large social media platforms. The laws were challenged by tech industry trade groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, whose members include Facebook parent Meta, Alphabet Inc.'s Google, which owns YouTube, as well as TikTok and Snapchat owner Snap Inc. Many Republicans have argued that social media platforms stifle conservative voices in the guise of content moderation, branding this as censorship. Read more: https://reut.rs/3VPlL7s
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
LOAD-SHEDDING AND INFORMATION RIGHTS: A total of 4 879 coded sources featured in coverage of load-shedding over the three-year monitoring period. READ THE FULL REPORT HERE: https://bit.ly/3HfpTqM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I am not naturally a confrontation-forward individual. However, as one of the unsuspecting employees caught in the crossfire of this scandal, and on behalf of the entire team impacted, I am compelled to assert the overlooked well-being and justice of the former employees of OZY Media. As I observe more and more content being shared on the #CarlosWatson and #OzyMedia federal case in #NYC, I ask: What is the Watson family doing to clean up the aftermath of everything that happened, for the former team of employees who worked so hard (under alleged false pretense) for Carlos? The CEO, investors and corporate entity have a responsibility to the full team of humans who, from my personal observations worked exceptionally hard to contribute to ethical media. We have not received appropriate communication, reasonable termination information, 401K documentation, or even 2023 tax documents. This doesn’t even start to address the combined thousands of dollars in unpaid travel expenses and invoices - which were left as personal debt to the humans who served them as their team and staff. Nor does this even start to address the personal and professional harm this has inflicted to hardworking and ethically clean team members who were blindsided by the entire ordeal. Quite simply stated: There is clean up to do, Beverly Watson and Carlos Watson, to validate your intentions and your words.
Our brother and our family are one step closer to justice today. This morning, the lawyers who played a key role in taking down Fox News in the recent Old Dominion Voting Rights case, have set their sights on Ben Smith, one of the true villains in the Carlos' case. A major federal lawsuit has been filed against Smith, BuzzFeed, and his new company Semafor for lying, breach of contract, and misappropriation. Our fight for justice continues and we pray for vindication for Carlos and my whole family. #JusticeForCarlos #FightForJustice #DiverseVoices #Truth #HoldHimAccountable https://lnkd.in/gDNV9NfU
Ozy sues Ben Smith and BuzzFeed, claiming the media executive stole trade secrets to create Semafor
businessinsider.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The US Supreme Court recently held two major hearings on social media laws, asking this key question: Do states have the right to restrict how social media companies moderate and run their platforms? The nine judges gathered on Feb. 26 to hear Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton and establish where Tech Giants rank in the hierarchy of First Amendment protections in the US. What does this case mean for the future of social media companies? What does this mean for hearings down the road? Read EGA’s Five Facts to Know about the SCOTUS hearing: https://lnkd.in/eFvbZijW #SCOTUS #Technology #SocialMedia
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
USN veteran. Simplifying OT / ICS Security. Compliance. DevSecOps. Neurodivergent & underserved population supporter.
This is a wild case based on the vast differences of use cases and positions - it manages to inextricably roll up competing important topics: freedom of speech including systematic censorship, our national interests, mass disinformation including defense, and privacy. This gets really spicy with real people making mistakes on both sides and strong positions depending on the content. To what extent is a social media company just a host of other people’s discussion? Is “persuasion” vs “coersion” actionable 🤷♂️? What authority, responsibility, and obligation do they have? What about the algorithms? What about abuse such as bot nets by special interest groups including competing governments? I invite discussion if we can avoid positions on specific politically sensitive topics.
Supreme Court examines whether government can combat disinformation online — NPR
apple.news
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Once people learn about pick-all-you-like voting, they immediately prefer it over our current plurality system. Here's why we think it's the best voting method out there: https://bit.ly/3WEh6UR
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The flash polls in the aftermath of the presidential debate reflect something stark about America. And it's not good. I use Streamyard.com to post content on multiple platforms seamlessly, with up to 10 guests at a time. Use this referral link to receive a discount: https://lnkd.in/ewumwEGY Streamyard is user-friendly...it would have to be to not over-tech me. If you're looking for a solution to your livestreaming and video/broadcast archiving, I believe you'll solve all your issues via: https://lnkd.in/ewumwEGY
The post-debate polls are jaw-dropping...but not how you expect
www.linkedin.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Our Center has filed an amicus brief in the NetChoice cases, arguing that while the Supreme Court should strike down the Texas and Florida laws restricting social media platform content moderation as unconstitutional, the Court should refrain from embracing the industry’s sweeping theory of First Amendment protection. In our NetChoice brief, we argue that the Supreme Court should not foreclose potential regulation of social media platforms that is narrowly drafted and content-neutral. We advocate regulation that would require platforms to disclose currently secret data related to topics such as how their human content moderators interact with automated moderation systems and how and why platform algorithms promote certain content that goes viral, while other content gets relatively little circulation. https://lnkd.in/eZBSbRKY
To view or add a comment, sign in
-