DOL Home > OALJ > Whistleblower > Marbach v. Comphealth, 2002-ERA-23 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2002) |
Marbach v. Comphealth, 2002-ERA-23 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2002), 2002-ERA-23 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2002)
U.S. Department of Labor | Office of Administrative Law Judges Heritage Plaza Bldg. - Suite 530 111 Veterans Memorial Blvd Metairie, LA 70005 (504) 589-6201 | ![]() |
Issue date: 18Sep2002
Case No.: 2002-ERA-23
In the Matter of
DR. JAMES MARBACH, M.D.,
v.
COMPHEALTH,
Complainant
Respondent.
This is a proceeding arising under the Energy Reorganization Act ("ERA"), 42 U.S.C. §5851, and its implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 24. On May 7, 2002, the parties submitted a duly executed "Joint Motion for Approval of the Settlement Agreement, Dismissal with Prejudice, and Confidential Treatment of the Settlement Agreement." Although Part 24 regulations do not contain any provision relating to dismissal of a complaint by voluntary settlement, under the Rules of Practice and Procedure for Administrative Hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, 29 C.F.R. Part 18, which are controlling in the absence of a specific provision at Part 24, the parties in a proceeding before an administrative law judge may reach agreement on their own. 29 C.F.R. Part 18.9(a)-(c).
Under the terms of the instant Settlement Agreement, the Respondent agrees to pay Complainant a stated sum in consideration of releases and discharges stated therein. With respect to the confidentiality provision of the Settlement Agreement, which provides that the parties shall keep the terms of the settlement confidential, it is noted that they have attempted to comply with applicable case law by specifically providing that the confidentiality provision does not restrict disclosure where required by law. See McGlynn v. Pulsair, Inc., 93-CAA-2.
Having fully reviewed the Settlement Agreement in accordance with applicable precedent, I find that its terms are a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of the complaint. See Thompson v. U.S. Department of Labor, 885 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1989); Bonanno v. Stone & Weber Engineering Corp., 97-ERA-33 (ARB June 27, 1997).
Accordingly, the Joint Motion of the parties is GRANTED, and it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Settlement Agreement between Complainant, Dr. James C. Marbach and Respondent CompHealth, Inc. be APPROVED and that the instant complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
So ORDERED.
RICHARD D. MILLS
Administrative Law Judge
NOTICE: This Recommended Decision and Order will automatically become the final order of the Secretary unless, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §§24.8, a petition for review is timely filed with the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. Such petition for review must be received by the Administrative Review Board within ten business days of the date of this Recommended Decision and Order, and shall be served on all parties and Chief Administrative Law Judge. See 29 C.F.R. §§24.8 and 24.9, as amended by 63 Fed. Reg. 6614 (1998).