DOL Home > OALJ > Whistleblower > Kim v. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 95-ERA-7 (ALJ Aug. 22, 1995) |
DATED: August 22, 1995 CASE NO. 95-ERA-0007 IN THE MATTER OF SANG JOO KIM, Complainant v. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Respondent Sang Joo Kim, Pro se Carol B. Trask, Esq. for the Respondent Before: Paul H. Teitler Administrative Law Judge RECOMMENDED DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIM On May 31, 1995, at the hearing of L. Craig Wagerle v. the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, the Complainant Sang Joo Kim, who was present, was directed by the undersigned to advise his office whether he was going to continue with his action. More than thirty (30) days had passed and the Complainant had not communicated with this office. Additionally, the Complainant has not provided the Court with any way to communicate with him orally. On July 13, 1995, an Order to Show Cause allowing the Complainant fifteen (15) days to show why his Complaint should not be dismissed. To date no response has been received from the Complainant. Accordingly, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §24.5(4)(ii), it is
[PAGE 2] RECOMMENDED that the Complaint of Sang Joo Kim be DISMISSED. ____________________________ PAUL H. TEITLER Administrative Law Judge PHT:abr