Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler - Full Report
Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler - Full Report
-
.
.
,..
-
-
'
-
'
~
'
-
.
"
"
'
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
.
.
-
:
.
'
:
.
.
:
.
:
.
.
-
...I
_
.
'
,
-
'
-
-
-
-
-
~
,
-
-
.
-
"
-
.
,"
=
-
:
-
:
.
-
:
:
:
:
_
J
=
:
.
.
:
.
-
:
-
-
-
=
'
-
-
=
-
-
.
.
:
.
-
'
~
I
,
:
1
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
I
.
'
.
(
.
~
i
'
$
I
"
r
}
.
.
;
'
~
J
.
I
o
j
l
t
-
j
.
.
.
.
I
$
J
l
5
t
r
.
.
.
,
:
"
~
1
0
-
1
~
.
.
.
0
.
.
i
.
J
I
~
'
.
.
.
.
I
,
I
I
~
'
0
:
1
,
3
,
.
r
.
.
.
;
~
.
,
.
.
,
;
f
~
,
.
.
.
~
r
.
.
.
r
.
:
I
.
.
.
,
t
~
.
.
.
:
.
:
/
~
[
'
.
s
:
-
0
.
,
v
~
~
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"
,
j
.
.
.
.
.
'
j
.
,
'
- .
.
.
;
:
:
C
'
.
.
/
:
x
'
<
'
.
.
.
.
1
<
t
-
.
v
:
-
<
'
.
.
.
.
.
- :
z
-
<
.
.
.
.
.
:
z
:
2
1
1
APPENDIX F
Supplementary Graph and Charts
1. Types of Activities Coded in the Child Instrumentation
2. Coding Sheet for each of the four coding activities:
a) Child Cartoon coding instrument (114 questions)
b) Child Visual coding instrument (75 questions)
c) Adult Cartoon Crime and Violence instrument (35 questions)d) Adult Visual Crime and Violence
instrument (49 questions)
212
Types of Activities
VIOLE:\T ACTIVITIES
" lurtll'rHus/:\laiming:
(c.g .. consumption of human Ocsh,
dCGlpitation. bludgeoning,
smashing, shooting. stabhing; mutilation
of 01 hl'f. choking. strangling, hanging,
gagging. scif-mlllibtion. burning, etc.)
Inl1icting Pain:
(c .g., \'iolent hitting, punching, kicking,
rounding, whipring, or insening or
:lllaching.ilems into body that cause pain)
FOrl'e/Planned Force:
(e.g., restraint, coercion, clothing
rirred or pulled, lurking in wait to
assault, slapping, spanking, paddling)
Violent
(e.g .. violent or aggressive gesture,
verbal threat, vcrbal coercion)
Vi olen t Discussion:
(c.g., presenting violently educaLive
information. telling violent story, making
violcnt statement or observation)
Violent Fantasy lMemory:
Other Violent:
Excretory Activity:
(e.g., defecation, urination,
regurgitation)
(e.g., abortion, hysterectomy, vasectomy,
artilicial insemination)
SEXU.-\L ACTIVITIES
Genital/Anal Sex:
(e.g., coitus, anal/genital, anal/or:d or
oral/genital Cf'ntact; inscrting itcms inlo
vagina or anus)
Venere:J1 Disc:Jse:
(t' (1 ni<;(,II,<;rd ('Ie ,1''.::ribcd)
Sexu:J1 F !)replay:
(e.g., fondling genitals, breasts or
buttocks; being in bed together)
Being Nude/T:Jking ofT/Putting on Clothes:
Sexual Invasion or Privacy:
(e.g., Oashing, exhibiting, peeping,
voluntary or involuntary voyeurism,
obscene phone call)
Sexual Arousal:
(e.g., masturbation, autoeroticism, having
an erection)
Sexual f'.lessage:
(e.g., sexual gestures, including
beckoning, licking lips, verbal se:\-ual
overture)
Sexual Discussion:
(e.g., presentation of sexually educative
information, telling sexual story, making
a sexual statement or observation)
Sexual Fantasy or Memory:
Other Sexual Activity:
(including unspecified or unclear sexual
activity)
NOl'l'VIOLENT /NONSEXUAL ACTIVITIES
Nonsexual/Nomin)ent Fantasy or Memory:
Other Nonsexual/Nonviolent Activity:
(including unspecified or unclear
nonsexual, nonviolent activity)
Trickery:
(e.g., assurance that sex will
cure hiccupsj claim by adult
this is education; offering
ChIld candy, a doll, wine)
Affectionate Activity:
(e.g., nonsexual gestures, such as
shaking hands, holding hands, arm-in arm,
arm around waist or shoulder; a verbal
endearment, gazing into each other's eyes)
General Discussion:
(e.g., presentation of general educative
information, telling nonsexual and nonviolent
story, making nonsexual and nonviolent
statement)
213
MAGAZ! NE/COCER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7_
8.
9.
10.
1"
12_
13.
14.
15.
16_
17.
18.
19.
20.
2l.
22.
-23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29_
30.
31.
32_
33_
34_
35 _
36.
37.
38.
(A)
(B)
DATA
Uni t
Ii t 1 e
Coder nunber
Year
Month
1/ Pages
1/ Cartoons
1/ Chila cartoons
Page coded
Side
Color
Size
Name
1/ Characters
Lifeless
Phys. sett i ng
Conte)( t
Assault
Murder
Child/adult: se)(
Child/older child
Child/family memo
Pornography
Indecent exposure
Ch i ld/se)( medi a
Obscene call
nudity
Procuring
Se)('deal/bart
Adul tery
Alcohol
Arson
Child abuse/neg.
Drugs
Kidnapping
Runaway
Theft
Other viol/illegal
Sell ori en!.
Sex. reI.
Nursery/fairy
Special theme
Erot/pornog: self
Coding Instrument Sheet
Child Cartoon Unit
OF ACTIVITY
39. Murder, maiming
40. Inflicting pain
Force/Planned force
Viol. message
85_
86_
87.
88.
89.
RecJ2nc I eve,
Init/lst l;::vo.
Ini tlZnd level
Observer
Emot.. ex;::ress.
41-
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
5,.
Viol. discussion
Viol. memory/fan.
Other viol.
Genital/anal
Venereal Dis.
OTHER CHARACTER
90. Sex
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
6"
62.
63.
64.
65.
Sex foreplay
Being nude
Se)( Inv. Privacy
Se)( arousal
Sell message
Su discussion
Se)( Fantasy/memory
Other se)(
E)(cretory
Medical/surgical
Affect i onate
General Discuss.
N. se)(/Viol. fam.
Other N. sex/viol.
Trickery/fraud
Props/sexual
Props/viol.
Su use
RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDINGS
66. Ch i ld te)(t eye span
67. Consec./child
68. Eyespan/sex
69. Eyespan/Viol.
70. Eyespan art/into
71. Juxtaposed: sex
72. Juxtaposed: vi 01.
PRINCIPAL CHILD
73. Sex chi ld
74.
75.
76.
n.
78.
79._
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
Race/ethnicity
'More than one
Age: only/young
physical
Age: old/phys.
Age: only young cues
Age: old/cues
Cue: age discrep.
Physical Oep.
Dress/undress
Placement
Rec/1st level
91.
92.
93_
94.
95.
96_
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102_
103.
101..
105 _
106.
107.
108_
109.
110.
'11-
112.
113.
, 114.
FOR TAU USE ONLY:
COOER INITIALS:
DATE COOED:
214
Race/ethn
i
c;:y
More tho:"'! C'-,('
Age: only/y' .... ";
physical
Age: 01 d/;:;h 'is i :;, ,
Age: onl y/y<:'..;r.;
cues
Age: old/cues
Cue: Age clS:-:<J.
Physical CE;:=:o
Authority
Placement
Rec i pi ent
Observer
Initiator
Emot. Expr.
Sell
Race/ethni city
Age of tert i i
Physical cep.
Authori ty
Placement
Rec i pi ent
Observer
Ini tiator
Protector
_1-
A
Appendix F
CHILD VISUAL UNIT
MAGAZINE/CODER DATA
1. Title 2. Year 3. Month 4. Page,
B. VISUAL OVERVIEW
6. Number 7. Color 8. Size 9. Type
5. Coder
10. Series
11. AD 12. Physical Set 13. Culture 14. Theme
C. PRINCIPAL CHILD
15. Child 16. Criteria 17. Sex 18. Race 19. Place
20. Depiction 21. Cue 22. Source 23. Exposure 24. Pink
25. Dressed 26. Hair 27. Adult 28. Pose 29. Setting
30. Eye 31. Facial
D. OTHER CHARACTER
32. Other 33. Sex 34. Race 35. Place 36. Depiction
37. Age Cues 38. Authority 39. Protector
E. SEXUAL'STATUTORY INFORMATION AND F. PROPS
40. Lifeless 41. Orient 42. Relate 43. Obscene 44. Barter
45. Theft 46. Abuse 47. Drug 48. Run 49. A-Props
50. B-Props 51. B-Sex 52. Ch-Prop
G. TYPES OF ACTIVITIES DEGREE P.C. O.C.
53. Romantic Kissing
54. Affectionate Activity
55. Invasion of Privacy
56. Sexual Display
57. Sexual Foreplay; Arousal
58. Genital, Anal Sex
59. GE;lneral Activity
60. Force, Planned Force
61. Inflicting Pain
62. Killing, Maiming
63. Medical/Surgical
64. VD. Morbid Presentation
H. RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDINGS
65. Other 66. Twoeye 67. Sexind 68. Sexpic
69. Viopic 70. Art 71. TextSN 72. Textch
73. Topic 74. Words 75. Satan
CODER INIT.
DATE:
215
Appendix F
ADULT CARTOON UNIT
A MAGAZINE/CODER DATA
1. Title 2. Year 3. Month 4. Page 5. Number
B. CARTOON OVERVIEW
6. Color 7. Size
C. TYPES 0 F ACTIVITIES
8. Killing 9. Assault 10. Viol/Sex 11. OtherViol
!
12. Suicide 13. Theft 14. Drug 15. Persllnst
16. GenPub 17. Accident 18. SexDeal 19. Invpriv
MODIFIERS
20. Other I-S 21. Anal 22. Racial 23. Satanic
D. ROLE OF CHARACTERS
VICTIM 24. Sex 25. Ra 26. Age 27. Depic
PERPETRATOR 28. Sex 29. Race 30. Age 31. Depic
32. Protect 33. Role 34. Nude/Prim 35. Nude/Sec
CODER INIT: ____ _
DATE: _____________ _
CODER NO. ______ _
216
AppendixF
ADULT VISUAL UNlT
A MAGAZINE DATA
1. Title 2. Year 3. Month 4. Page 5. Number
B. VISUAL OVERVIEW
6. Color 7. Size 8. Type 9. Series
10. Theme 11. Props 12. Chars 13. Nature
C. ROLE OF C,HARACTERS
"A": 14. Type 15. Port. 16. Sex 17. Race 18. Age 19. Nude
"Ii": 20. Type 21. Port. 22. Sex 23. Race 24. Age 25. Nude
26. Roles: A 27: Roles: B 28. Protect
D. TYPES OF ACTIVITIES
29. Killing
30. AssaultlBattery
31. Violent Sexual Activity
32. Other Viol. Act (nonsexual)
33. Violent Prop or Symbol
34. Suicide
35. Theft
36. Drug-Related Activity
37. White-Collar Crime
38. Crime: gen. publiclinst.
39. Accident
40. Sex-Dealing
41. Invasion of Privacy
42. Other Illegal Sexual
43. HomosexuallLesbian
44. Anal
MODIFIERS
45. Racial 46. Sat/Occult.
DEGREE
47. ScatIMorb.
217
A B
E. USE OF PROPS
48. Purpose 49. Setting
CODER INIT:-----
CODER NO.-----
D A T E : - - ~ - - - - -
APPENDIX G
Sample Graphs and Time Lines
from
Data Book, Volume III
November 1986 Report
218
1.2
1.1 .
0.9
en
O
8
'tI
C
I 0.7
en
:=
o 0.6
.s::.
t:.. O.S
...
G> 0.4
.a
e
:= 0.3
Z
0.2
0.1
. THREE TOPSELLING E/P* PUBLICATIONS
NEWSSTAND AGGREGATE
.. . . . .' .
,. . . . . .
.. a
. . . . .
.. *" .. ~
.. .. .. <0 .. .. ~
. .. . .. .
. .. .. . .. .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. . .. ..
. .. . .. '" .
. .. . . . .
. .. . ..
.. .. . . ..
.. . . . .
.. . .. .. .
.. .. .. ..
. .. .. .. .. ~ ..
" .. . .. ..
.. . .. ..
S4 S5 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 n 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
"Erotica/Pornography: Three magazine aggregate
Year
ITIIl CHILD DEPICTIONS
R
L.;.;j
ADULT CRIME AND VIOLENCE DEP,ICTIONS
1100
1050
1000
I-
THREE TOPSELLING E/P* PUBLICATIONS
I-
NEWSST AND AGGREGATE
r-
I-
PERCENTAGE INCREASE 1954-1984
r-
i
r-
/
r-
/
~
/
r- /
r-
/
/
r-
/
~
/
...
/
- /
-
/
/
/ /
-
/
/
/ 650 %
-
/
/
950
900
850
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
/
/
/ Increase
50
25
- / /
/
/
/
/
2,600%
/
Increase
/
/
/
L
II.LI IILI III I I . L ~
16 DEPICTIONS 412 DEPICTIONS 170 DEPICTIONS
"Erotica/Pornography: Three magazine aggregate
ITIIl CHILD DEPICTIONS [ill ADULT CRIME AND VIOLENCE DEPICTIONS
/
,
/
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
... . . .
...... ,.
.1
----
1102 DEPICTIONS
!! r.
'1...- L..-
..
.: T
A
A
:::
.. /-----.
.L
2.:
A
1S5S lSS4 1959 1974 S 79
,(EARL( OF
i AG E S
240
,220
2CJ
1'00 --,
140
-'
Y EA." OF PUBLiCA nON
"enthouse 0 Hustler + PGOled
220
II)
ill
O
0
E
-
0
L
Q)
..0
E
.... ::J
Z
C tl i I d
Co rtoC'tl:::; (CC=:)
()
c)L t--'I I I cl
\ / 'I l I I. -1 I
Ii _ .. ' _.
( \,. \
'. .; I
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
[7/'1 ' /
B e i n <J Nu dE: 0 r Sex u q I [J i pi (l Y
,</>'
," I' ,I' ,
,.. /' // '\
('>":/>"/
.',1' ,/ /""
"/ //>
/,,"/'//
I' / / /
/, 1,-
./1'////' ..."
//,//""
-:"'/1'//1/ /
. / '/.
" '/. ,(
"
/,"'--" "//
//// '-.><'; -, ." /< /// ",--",",' / /', ' " ,,//"
- ,- // //' "', '-,' / // " " ' " / /
,,' ' ,;;"",," '/'
" I / ,.. <' (I' )')" I "0' / ,/ / " "'" . .' / " . , LL ", \, </ /: .""'" -< " ,/ . " " ',,>;<
__ ...... ,,- '\ \ ". '. . .// ,I', '" ' /
-"--"--- '" __ __ . ___ ... :. _
Plqyboy
cc p
P (:; ('I tho II ::; t !
DE Pie; T [[J
(. C I fn p
tlllil/) /\Crl\'lr/,
. ,/J l \.' I) . . I' .
, . .:J .' i .. _:l.
H u ! .. ; r
\ "
v
III 'I'
:
J
{
(
....
.
;
j
>
n
.
.
.
.
/
(
X
/
'
\
Q
>
i
'
J
I
f
)
c
<
5
Q
c
<
{
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
~
.
-
U
Q
.
.
.
.
.
,
'
-
C
)
c
'
1
'
'
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
/
(
!
)
U
)
,
,
-
L
'
0
0
-
f
-
1
L
0
U
u
.
.
.
c
(
)
a
a
0
a
t
o
r
-
.
.
.
a
a
<
.
0
a
o
I
.
.
(
)
a
a
v
:
2
2
2
o
a
n
o
a
N
a
a
a
>
:
-
-
J
Q
-
w
'
)
\
.
.
-
'
-
(
.
.
.
)
u
Q
>
Q
U
U
i
,
.
.
.
-
-
.
.
.
.
'
-
"
-
>
r
'
"
.
.
'
-
)
,
,
.
,
'
.
j
)
- I
I
1
(
"
'
.
)
)
1
-
'
"
,
,
-
Q
>
,
.
.
.
-
(
)
,
"
'
:
"
'
"
L
.
.
I
1
:
]
-
.
.
)
r
-
I
e
n
'.
-
-
-
-
(
\
"
-
.
.
/
(
J
+
-
I
L
C
J
(
-
)
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
+
n
N
0
m
r
o
N
-
2
2
3
V
j
)
:
i
.
-
.
/
.
.
c
.
-
-
'
C
I
l
,
)
C
L
0
.
D
.
v
C
L
/
'
,
1
"
r
t
:
.
.
.
:
.
J
(
_
1
c
t
"
"
W
-
.
,
:
;
)
C
Q
C
.
-
-
-
:
(
'
l
-
:
'
1
.
:
.
.
.
/
"
"
"
'
-
.
Q
.
:
1
)
0
Q
.
'
-
-
-
/
- L
.
.
L
.
.
Q
-
/
_
,
U
/
,
,
\
Q
)
0
U
U
0
Crlild Cartoons (CC) & Child Visuals (CV)
Scatological or Morbid Presentation
70
60
50
(I)
Q.)
(J)
0
E 4-0
-0
I:'.;)
L-
I:'.;) Q.)
30 .p...
..Q
E
J
Z
20
10
o I L. L. I rL.L.LII\V>'" t'Z'1S:"_
Playboy Pen tho Ll se H 1I Ie r
DEPICTED (uep) &, 1t'-:1fl)ED (Irnp) ACTlVrl _
fZZl CC pep rs::sJ CC Inlp cv Uep CV 1m p
CUM U LATIVE DISTRIBUTION
of the Numberof
Child Fairy tale Cartoons
55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 6.04 65 66 67 68 6g 70 71 72 73 7.04 75 7 ~ 77 78 7g 80 61 82 83 54
YEAR
225
13
;
L
(
r)
, .
, ,
V!::;'F:
CHIL:l CARTC:I)N DATA: CHILD IN SEXI:AL
WITH AN OLDER PERSON
PLAY80Y, PENTHI)USE, ,I
HUSTLER
= P8
C
::
?8
PH
+
= F'8, PH,
!" H
55 60 65 70 7:5
YEAR
226
80
, ,
....
+
=
P 1 ... Y t ,) Y
Hust 1,.:,.r
-
227
, I
\ !
\'
, ~
i I
75
J
j
I
T
N
.Ij
M
9
=
R
,)
F
A
C
T
V
I
T
I
E
S
"
.;
.,'
CHILD DATA: PLAYBOY. EO
7i)'::-___________ +
f violent a.nd sexu.l
es w{th toe PrinCl-
d as INITIATOR
Number
;a.CtlVl':
p ... I C:-' 1 __________________________________ __
t
. ...,
, ,
-'
17
!
55 60 65 70 75
YEAR
CHILJ DATA: PLAY90Y. PENTHOUSE,
Numb@r of non-violent and non-
sexual activities with the Prin-
clpa.l Child as INITIATOR
.-
PB =
C
= PB to. PH
+
::
PB. PH,
i-I
55
YEAR
228
6(: .::;
c
'j
T
R
F
A
T
'./
r
T
I
E
;;,
, ....
1 I
, ....
. ,
o
CHILJ CARTOON DATA: PLAYBOY! .!" '-'!JS""LE.::>
Number of Violent .ctlYlties
the Chl11
a.s INITIATOR
=
PB
C
PB
.
PH "J.
+
=
PS, PH
!. '-'
55 60 65 70
YEAR
75
CH IL!) CARTOON DATA: PLAYBOY, PENTHCUSE
Nymber of sexual .ctivitiel
WIth thd"PrlnClpal Child
as INITIATOR
iv-?
2
PB
C
=
PB
+
PS, PH
!.
.....
S5 60 65
229
70
YEAR
75
....
[
80
80 8S
'j
.'
"
/
)
1
3
)
::,
r
I
,/
r
I
-
;
3
?
________ HUS
7
LER
Number ?f non-viol t
.ctivit en non-
CHILD CARTOON D . ATA: PLAYBOY
clp.l Child les wlth th. Prin-
RECIPIENT
- PE
c
230
::?
17
'"
,.;,
1 :-'
o
Numoer of activities
' .. nth Pr.nClpal Child
as
'"
PB
C
= P8 t,. PH
+ '"
P9, PH
!.
55 60 65 70
YEAR '
75
CHILD CARTOON DATA: PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE t..
Number '=If sex!.!a.l .;tctivities
with Principa,l Chlld
a.s RECIPIENT
PS
C
= PB PH
+
= ?S, PH
!. H
55 60 65 70
YEAR
231
75
80
80 85
-:'
1 ,
.)
17
o
:::HIL..D CARTOON DA7A: PLAYBOY I P::NTHOUSE '" ;"<IjS7'_EP
of vlolent
.a.ctlvitles i<llth the- Princi-
;;.1 ':hl:d ;,s OBSERVER
P9
C
P8 PH
+
P8, PH,
"'-H
55 60 65 70
YEAR,
75
CHII 0 DATAi PI AYBOY, PENTHO!!5F S< L.;1:5,i E::;;
of and non-
sexual actIvities with the Prin-
cIpal Chi ld as DESERVER
=
PB
C
=
PB
+
=
PB,
H
55
'"
PH
P'-l
60 65
232
70
YEAR
7::5 80 8
\
CHILD PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE
70
'1
"
N'Jmber of' violent act ivit ies
f.
-.JJlth the- 'Ch 11 d
as
CBSER\)ER
..
,
-:1
.
PB
=
""
17
:
Ci
,:
D9 .!" PH
t
i"-l.
; +
= P9, PH,
!.
y
; --,-<+:i"
.
s ", '\,
.....
"
'-
,,':-.; ".
'\:'" ."\:} hf
M
\') ,
.,
,
i
i} I
'55 60
30
YEAR
':HILD CARTOON DATA: PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE!" HUSTLE,R
70
, -r
I
Number of sexual activlties
the Principal
a.s OBSERVER
= PB
c = PB PH
55 60 65
233
70
YEAR
90
i
9"3
i'.:)
w
,p..
14,854 ADULT CRIMEVIOLENCE
PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE, HUSTLER
s
121 ------1
10
8
6 .. , ,","
4
2
"' : .
. , . .
,. to
, -'
o
, -.
CAR KIL:"'IN &'1 SEX VIOLE'N X
x
1:..7
. J
See :V, Discussion of the
Findir,;;Js,:::;rirne Bid VIQ!ence in
Pi2.yboy, dustier p. 101.
F AS I (3t=: i T!\LS
_ Series
1
, J
I
XII. Extra appendixes
May 2013 A copy of Images of Children, Crime and Violence in
Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler is digitized and made freely
available at drjudithreisman.com with the following additions:
A. Taboo or not taboo? by Lyn Owen, UK Guardian, September 16, 1977
B. About My Study of 'Dirty Pictures' by Judith A. Reisman, The
Washington Post National Weekly Edition, July 1, 1985
C. Cover page of the Executive Summary of this report, available in full
at drjudithreisman.com, including its following page, Letter from
John B. Rabun, Jr., Deputy Director, National Center for Missing &
Exploited Children
D. Scientific Authority for the Sex Industry Complex (SIC) in the 20th -
21st Century flowchart by Judith A. Reisman
E. Common Law vs. Model Penal Code flowchart and accompanying
description A General Overview of How State Criminal Code
Reform Proceeded Largely during the 60s and 70s by Judith A.
Reisman
F. Causal Effect of Kinseys Fraudulent Data The 1955 American
Law Institute Model Penal Code Eliminates Common Law to
Reduce/End Sex Offense Laws and Parole All Criminals flowchart by
Judith A. Reisman
G. Playboy Lost to Reisman! Reisman Child Porn Study Defeats
Playboy's Dutch Libel Suit available at drjudithreisman.com
JULY 1, 1 98.5
--l
Judith Reisman
About My Study of 'Dirty Pictures"
Some d my critics say I blt at
foe a living. To put it somewhat JllCR ob;ective1y. I
direct the $734,000 Justice Department study of
three widely read magazines I caII ..
phf' -part ci a growing $7 billioo-a-year 3eX indus-
try. Given the cost 01 this project, the tupaying pub-.
lie deserves a fair descriptioo oi our rese.arch ather
than snickers, soeersand premature cries ri. "cen-
sorship" that chiD informed public debate.
Using traditmal content analysis my re-
seafch staff catalogues activities involving children.
crime and vDence -foumi in the Pctures and cariooos
d Pbyboy, PenthorJse and Hustler, the three brgest-
- selling magarjnes Ahhough our
f.odings will Irt be cnrnpiered WJti November, I em
say that we have d!ntified 2,016 dn1d-re:Iated ear-
d which approximateJy 75 percent imoive du].
dren il vdent or sema1 activities.. Many ci th::se de-
Pet gang rape ci child W:tims, fathers sexually abusing
daughters, Santa Claus murdering a child. etc..
Despite press claims to the contrary. this research
Des well within the mainstream of serious pub& in- -
terest. polls 00 the subject 01. sexually
media, including the March 18. 1985, Newsweek
Poll tTj Ganup, report rooc.ern regarding thi;
effects ci sexually oriented media on society. Accocd-
ing to the Newsweek poD.. 73 percent of all respood-
entsbetieve explicit sexual magazines, movies
and books Lead some to commit rape or semal
vnence, while '93 percent-called for st:ricter coottod
c:J. magarjnes that show sexual visual Any
sexuaDy explicit materials that sell appt urimately
200 million copies annually and are passed 00 10
friends and family c:I. an ages, arl be seen as
"aex ed1x3tioo" and the 'prQpe1\ coocern ri. society.
- Why does this analysis deserve federal support?
Many people read sex magazines to learn about seJI:-
uaJ behavioc. If some sexual educatioo materials poco
tray children as desirable sex partners for this
may be si vital interest to parents and citizens who
are coocemed about increases in child sexual abuse.
Mea disturbing. law enforcement officials find sex-
ually explicit materials, inch ring these three maga-
zines, at the scene ri large numbers c:i sexually vident
crimes. Sexuafiy explicit materials are demonstrably
used to lure chikiren into criminal sex acts perpetrated
by adults and increasing numbers d j.rverules. There m
a cruciaJ need b- research expOCating the reparted in-
creases am changing nature c:l se:maI assault 00 bays.
girls and WOOlen. Careful examinatioo ci these
sex educatm materials is k>gic31 and Ioog overdue..
As an expert m mass ca:m:mmic:atm. I have studied
media depictioos ci children as targets of adult geI and
In 1m I identified what I ailed the "peeudcr
child" - j 1,1,- Stes :f female adults dressed as chi-
mimi rib teddy bean, lnUipope, baby talk md
graphic aeDbl dispiay.
These composites suggested a disturbing
ity. When pre3ented qet:ber, could ..,
blurring visuals, dD1d rape jaires IDd articles that
pnm ci adult -child leX U'OUIIe child leX fantasj.es in
readen? OYer time, ooWd lOme ruden
IUbcooacioaaIy misjudae aae-appropriate tenWity.
perhaps facilitating some focms oi abusive behavirnr?
1"bese hypotheses comcided with many poOCe ob-
researchers' examinations ai se.xu.ai en-
b:apu:b1t ci and recent findings in adult
pomograpby research. A ftill..scaJe. carefuDy de-
signed rese4i1ch effort 00 the coo.tent ci
p6cit magazines wu in onier. In Derembe:r 1983 I
received a grant from the Department_ cl. Justice to
amduct this research.
Our findings should provide for innovative PfO"'
to combat physical and sexual abuse rJ. dill-
dral. For example, police and child welfare tlraining
programs could be developed to help identify the role
oi sex materials in crime against
"The taxpaying public
deseroes a fair description
0/ our research rather than
snickers, sneers and
premature cries oje
'- '11"
-censorsnlp J @ @
brly in cases of. rape, IDoest. pornography. prootitu-
tian and abuse. Child welfare professionals may help
victims more e:fficie:ntly if they are aware
child was forced to repeat what was seen in
erotic/pornographid:: films and magazines.
!be data will also cootnbute to informed pllbOC de-
bate and facilitate the design of forward-looking tech-
niques far community, family and school sex
boo. Ultimately. the sex industry may police itself
through a code d standards.
We have indicatials ci a strong re1atircnsbip i:Je":ween
amJl'ltXIJy available mat:erials mdl
chili abuse. If this relationship proves to be the case,
pOOcy makers will need to creative pOOcies to
reduce chili abuse while protecting basic coostitutionaJ
tiberties such as free:bn d. speech. Perb.ap) it is rear of
this cbaIlenge that has caused individuals wOO are
otherwise proponents oi dti1d welfare to dismiss
study without really trying to understand its
This research is translating emotiocal and often
disturbin& visual information into statisticaDy Vlll1id.
usabJe data. Yet, the work bas been attacked as pav=
i:ng the way for censorship. Some writers argue thit
scOOlarly study of. mass-distribute(f magazines so
dangerous that it must be Upre-cenoored" in
name ri free speech. The ethlcal pursuit of
however, sOOWd never be discouraged. This
Jzys the bmdatim for dialogue on a aociaJ issue C'l
mtiomride coocem. When it is I
. the c:itizem'y will amsideJr their $134,000 welll{le!Ot.
'1'M aiter-il G profUflOl' in tM &Iwol of EduaJ
tUm at
'-----------------------------_._----_ .. _--
Executive Summary
IMAGES OF CHILDREN,
CRIME AND VIOLENCE
IN PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE
AND HUSTLER MAGAZINES
This research was sponsored by Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP), United States Department of Justice, Project No. 84-JN-AX-K007, and carried out
at The American University, Washington, DC, from February 1984 to November 1985 and
delivered to OJJDP in November 1987. Principal Investigator was Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.
While the complete three-volume Reisman Report is available from OJJDP, the agency
shelves several drafts of various reports ostensibly written by Dr. Reisman. However, only the
November 1987 Reisman Report has been approved by the Peer Review Board and
authenticated by the Principal Investigator. The Overview, Volume I, is recommended as a brief
( 503 page) synopsis of the research project and relevant information. All three volumes total
nearly 2,000 pages. For further information contact Dr. Reisman at The Institute for Media
Education, Box 7404, Arlington, VA 22207 (703-237-5455).
CONTENTS
Letter from John B. Rabun, Jr., Deputy Director,
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children,
................................................. 2
Introduction: Children in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler ........................ 3
Reprinted from Preventing Sexual Abuse
Composition of External Review Board ........................................... 3
Comments of Members of External Review Board ................................ 4
Executive Summary of Content Analysis of
Images of Children, Crime and Violence
in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Selected Bibliography . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. 11
Discussion of Cartoons and Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Sample Cartoons and Photographs from the Study ............................. 15
NATIONAL
CENTER FOR
Hl&fiiNO
CHILDREN
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., President
The Institute for Media Education
P.O. Box 7404
Arlington, VA 22207
Dear Dr. Reisman:
1835 K Street. N.W. Suite 700 Washington. D.C. 2000
202/634-9821
March 24, 1988
Many, many thanks for honoring our request and providing at no cost the hundreds of copies of the
"Executive Summary: IMAGES OF CHILDREN, CRIME AND VIOLENCE IN PLAYBOY, PENT-
HOUSE AND HUSTLER MAGAZINES" and for sending them to our mailing lists of criminal investigators
working cases of missing and sexually exploited children.
I have carefully studied the Executive Summary and strongly urge all those concerned with the welfare of
children to thoroughly review the document and give heed to the many disturbing implications contained
therein for the protection of children. This study must be read by all those concerned with the ways
pornography and violence in the media affect the incidence of child sexual exploitation and abuse. In support
of this thought, you may like to know some of my professional background and investigational findings.
Prior to my coming to the National Center as its Deputy Director, I was the Program Manager for the
Louisville-Jefferson County, Kentucky Exploited & Missing Child Unit-This police/social work Team was
the first in the nation created to provide detection, investigation, and protective services on behalf of youth as
well as apprehension and prosecutory services against adults criminally exploiting children through
prostitution, pornography, or child sex rings in the Louisville SMSA.
From July 1980 through February 1984 the police/social work Team of the E.M.C.U. investigated about
1,400 cases of children suspected of being victims of sexual exploitation. Fifty-four percent (756) of the
children were found to be victims and an additional 31% ( 431) of the children were considered probable
victims although lacking sufficient proof for court proceedings.
During this time period, the E.M.C.U. prosecuted hundreds of adults for various crimes involving the
sexual exploitation of children. Over 40 major cases involved the successful prosecution of adults involved
with over 12 children each. In one particular case, investigators thought there were up to 320 child victims. At
the lime of arrest of and/ or service of search warrants, ALL of these adult predators were found with
various forms pf adult pornography and in most cases chUd nudes and/or pornography. Over four
years, the E.M.C.U. Team learned to expect to always find adult pornography as such was used by the adult
offenders for their own sexual arousal, for self validation of their own sexual deviation(s), for extortion of
child victims or other adults, and for the deliberate and planned lowering of inhibitions of child victims.
Truly, the media you have identified can be devastating in effect in protecting children and gives real cause
for concern and study when child erotica seems to be on the increase in popular literature. Please keep in
touch with all current updates and new initiatives.
Again, many thanks for the multiple copies of the report and all your efforts in behalf of children.
Cordially,
John B. Rabun, Jr., ACSW
Deputy Director
Scientific Authority for the Sex Industrial Complex (SIC)
in the 20th - 21st Century
FUNDING
Crafting A Sex Field and The ALI-MPC
1955
1960s The Pill
Sexs, Drugs, R&R
ACADEMIC
INSTITUTIONS
COLLABORATORS
Original
Funders
Rockefeller Fnd.
Ntl. Research
Coun. Comm.
on Research
(Later, Playboy,
State, Federal
Grants)
INDIANA
UNIVERSITY
THE KINSEY INSTITUTE
1938
Original Sexuality
Collaborators,
Educators
Kinsey, Pomeroy
Gebhard, Martin,
Gagnon, Later:
Masters & Johnson,
Money, Simon, Schiller,
Calderone, Ramey, Lief,
Ellis, Benjamin
Calderwood, Tripp,
Reiss, Bullough,
McIlvenna, Haberlae,
Kolodny, etc.
(Well over 100,000
Kinsey Model Disciples
Begin Outreach)
Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey
A Certifiable Psychopath
Creates the USA Sex
Science Paradigm Shift
1948
1953
THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING
HUMAN SEXUALITY DEGREES IN TEACHING, COUNSELING
RESEARCH, Ph.D.s, MASTERS, EDUCATION DEGREES, SAFE SEX TRAINERS, ETC.
IASHS*
SF/Cal
1968
(Pomeroy)
NYU
Ed/Health
1964
(Calderwood)
U Penn
Ed/Health
1978
(George)
SSSS
Society For the Scientific
Study of Sex
1957
SSSS Board,
Founders
Pomeroy, Ellis, Beigel,
Guze, Lehfeldt, Benjamin,
George, Money, Bullough,
Reiss, Sherwin, Green,
Davis, Schaefer, Coleman,
Tietze, Amelar, Lippes,
Hartman, LoPiccolo,
Mosher, Byrne, Schwartz
Playboy 12/53 Launches
Big Pornography Industry
Mainstreams First Scenes
of Adult Sex w/Children
in Cartoons
SIECUS
(Sex Information & Education
Council of the United States)
1964
SIECUS Board,
Founders
Pomeroy, Calderwood,
Kirkendall, Gagnon,
Money, Reiss, Masters
& Johnson, Bell,
Marmor, Rubin,
Christenson, etc.
Schools:
1960 to Today
Public, Private &
Parochial
Kindergarten
through
Doctorate
2008 JA Reisman
Marriage,
Sex Laws
1955 to Today
Protections Gutted by
The American Law
Institute Model Penal
Code (ALI-MPC)
Commission
on Accreditation
1986
SSSS
Sex Education
Curricula
Wardell Pomeroy
Deryck Calderwood
Robert McIlvenna
Mary Calderone
Lester Kirkendall
Human Sexuality
Programs
Wardell Pomeroy
Deryck Calderwood
Paul Gebhard
Kenneth George
Vern Bullough
1971: BIG Pornography training for
Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR)
(George Leonard, on SAR for ESQUIRE: THE END OF SEX, p. 24.)
SAR & OTHER PORNOGRAPHIC COURSES
TO FULFILL DEGREE PROGRAMS; EG;
Erotic Massage, Self Massage, Sex Education Course Design & Implementation,
Sex Surrogate Use in Therapy, Fantasy, Masturbation, Forensic Sexology
ASSECT
American Society for Sex Educators,
Counselors & Therapist
1967
(Ellis & Schiller)
THE SEX INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (SIC)
(Big Pornography, Big Sexology, Big Pharmacology)
Medicate, Vaccinate for Pandemic STDs, Crimes, Dysfunctions
(Viagra, HepB, HPV, AIDS, etc.)
ASSECT applies the Kinsey Model through
outreach agencies like Planned Parenthood (PP)
& SIECUS entering schoolrooms, courtrooms, etc.
PP/SIECUS promote Outercourse:
Pornography, Bi/Sex, Promiscuity, Sodomy,
S/M, Sex Games, etc, for school children
American Assoc.
of Marriage & Family
Counselors
1977
Planned
Parenthood (PP)
also funded by
Rockefeller
Fnd.
1942
AMERICAN LAW REVIEWS/JOURNALS
(From 1982 - 2000, 650 Westlaw Cites)
THE MODEL PENAL CODE (MPC) REMOVES PROTECTIONS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN
U.S. Justice System 1948 - Today: Experts Usurp Jury of Ones Peers
Kinsey Reports (KR): The Advent of Consent
1948
Four Books Call for Science-Based Sex Law Reforms
1948
Rockefeller Funds Model Penal Code
1950
Herbert Wechsler, Harvard Law Review, Call for MPC
1952
AUTHORS / REPORTERS of MPC
Herbert Wechsler, Chief (Lawyer) Morris Ploscowe, Assoc. (Judge)
Louis B. Schwartz, Assoc. (Lawyer) Paul Tappan, Assoc.
(Lawyer/Sociologist)
MPC #4 Sex Offenses Draft Sent To States
WI
1956
IL
1962
MN
1963
NM
1963
NY
1967
GA
1969
KA
1970
NJ
1971
OR
1956
MD
1970
MA
1972
CN
1971
CO
1972
ID
1972
KY
1974
MS
1978
MI
1979
STATE LEGISLATURES
COURTS
CORRECTIONS
LAW
ENFORCEMENT
MPC ADVISORS/LAW
JUDGES:
Curtis Bok, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Pa.
Charles D. Breitel, Justice, New York Supreme Court, New York, N. Y.
Gerald F. Flood, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Pa.
Stanley H. Fuld, Judge, New York Court of Appeals, New York, N. Y.
Learned Hand, Judge (Ret.) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit,
New York, N.Y.
John J. Parker, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit,
Charlotte, N. C.
Orie L. Phillips, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit,
Denver, Colo.
Joseph Sloane, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Pa.
LAW SCHOOLS:
Dale E. Bennett, Louisiana State University Law School, Baton Rouge, La.
George H. Dession, Professor of Law, Yale Law School, New Haven, Conn.
Sheldon Glueck, Professor of Law, Law School of Harvard University, Cambridge,
Mass.
Jerome Hall, Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington,
Ind.
Albert J. Harno, Dean, University of Illinois, College of Law, Urbana, Ill.
Henry M. Hart, Professor of Law, Law School of Harvard University,
Cambridge, Mass.
Jerome Michael, Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law, New
York, N. Y. (Deceased 1953)
Frank J. Remington, Associate Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law
School, Madison, Wis.
John BarkerWaite, Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College
of Law, San Francisco, California.
CORRECTIONS/JUSTICE:
Sanford Bates, Commissioner, Department of Institutions and Agencies, State
of New Jersey, Trenton, N. J.
Winfred Overholser, M.D., Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital, Federal
Security Agency, Washington, D. C.
James V. Bennett, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington,
D. C.
Samuel Dash, Acting District Attorney, Philadelphia, Pa.
Florence M. Kelly, Attorney-in-Charge, Legal Aid Society, Criminal Courts Branch,
New York, N. Y.
Joseph Sarafite, Chief Assistant District Attorney, New York County, New York,
N. Y.
MPC ADVISORS/THERAPUTIC SCIENCES
SOCIOLOGY/ENGLISH:
Ernest W. Burgess, Professor of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Kenneth D. Johnson, Dean, New York School of Social Work, New York, N. Y.
Thorsten Sellin, Professor of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pa.
Lionel Trilling, Professor of English, Columbia University, New York, N. Y.
PSYCHIATRY/MENTAL HYGIENE:
Lawrence Z. Freedman, M.D., School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry
and Mental Hygiene, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Manfred S. Guttmacher, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Supreme Bench of Baltimore,
Baltimore, Md.
OTHERS:
Leonard S. Cottrell, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, N. Y.
Thomas D. McBride, Philadelphia, Pa.
Timothy N. Pfeiffer, New York, N. Y.
Floyd E. Thompson, Chicago, Ill.
Harrison Tweed, President, The American Law Institute, New York, N. Y.
Herbert F. Goodrich, Director, The American Law Institute, Philadelphia, Pa.
Sex Habits of American Men, A Symposium on the Kinsey Reports
Edited by Albert Deutsch
American Sexual Behaviour and the Kinsey Report
Morris Ernst & David Loth
The Ethics of Sexual Acts
Rene Guyon (French Pedophile Jurist)
About the Kinsey Report
Donald Porter Geddes & Enid Currie
1955
KR falsely claims that 95% of white men would be sex offenders,
were the common law enforced:
69% frequent prostitutes (prostitution is illegal)
85% have pre-marital sex (fornication is illegal)
50% commit adultery (adultery is illegal)
10%-37% are somewhat homosexual (sodomy is illegal)
While of white women KR falsely claims that:
0% are harmed by rape
50% have pre-marital sex (fornication is illegal)
26% commit and 50% desire adultery (adultery is illegal)
87% of pregnant single women abort (abortion is illegal)
25% of wives abort (illegal)
Of children, KR falsely claims that 100% are orgasmic from birth, hence:
Children can benefit from sex with adults and older persons,
even incest (illegal)
Children need early, explicit school sex education (illegal)
Children need masturbation, hetero/homosexual acts taught (illegal)
Of parole, KR falsely claims that sex offenders rarely repeat sex crimes.
COMMON LAW
Only lawful sexual congress is marital heterosexual coitus.
PRE-1948
MO
1978
ALL
OTHER
STATES
MPC #4 Sex Offenses Draft Adopted/Adapted By All States
PUBLIC/PRIVATE
EDUCATION
LEGAL PROFESSION
& LAW SCHOOLS
MEDICINE/
PSYCHIATRY
A General Overview of How State Criminal Code Reform Proceeded
Largely during the 60s and 70s is as follows:
1. After the 1952 call in the Harvard Law Review by Professor Herbert Wechsler, the
American Law Institute's Model Penal Code (Draft #4) was distributed to the states in 1955.
2 .. The state legislature provides funding, with federal assistance in some instances through
the 1968 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, to form a Commission to
reform/revise the state criminal code. The Commission advises and approves drafts written
by one or more "reporting staff."
3. The Commission consisted of law school professors from each major law school, judges,
and prosecutors. Some states had advisory committees that included the therapeutic sciences,
and corrections.
4. The Commission and/or drafting committee examines the American Law Institute Model
Penal Code as its primary source for reform including the ALI's recommended changes.
There is also frequent reference to the early state revisions in lllinois (1962), New York
(1967) and New Jersey (1971). Some states also looked at the Louisiana laws which are
uniquely based on the Napoleonic code. There are specific citations to The Kinsey Reports,
as well as the Wolfenden Report (a study of Sodomy in Great Britain) in the sex offenses
recommendations, or to "second generation" sources which cite to The Kinsey Reports via
the 1955 draft of the MPC being a primary example.
5. The Commission or one of its key spokesmen publishes an article calling for "reform" in a
law school or Bar journal. The justification given is that existing law is "obsolete," not based
on "current social and scientific thought," and too complex. Some cite examples such as
references to trains and livery stables.
6. In the "Crimes against the person" and "offenses against morals" state law code sections,
are renamed "sex offenses" in the Model Penal Code.
7. The common law concept of "conSent" primarily to marry (or to determine if the crime
was rape or fornication) is twisted to move toward legalization of all sexual contacts between
"consenting adults," with the age of consent being lowered in most cases.
8. Forcible rape becomes so narrowly defined by the requirement that the victim prove her
resistance by injury or death, that the lesser crimes or infractions are often plea-bargained.
One state (Minnesota) has eliminated the term "rape" all together. Others use "sexual
assault," "sexual misconduct," "sexual contact," "sexual conduct," "illegal intercourse," or
other terms to describe sex offenses. The new terms for rape in the reformed codes are
defmed differently from state to state, as are the ages applied, and the penalties.
9. The state revision Commission introduces the concept of"forcib1e compulsion" into the
definition of rape (burden of proof shifts from the predator to the victim), and the crime is
diminished by the creation of lesser offenses based on degree of non consent, the age of the
victim, and age differential of the offender and victim, the amount of injury, the relationship
between the predator and victim, if any.
10. As recommended by the Model Penal Code and The Kinsey Reports (Male Volume p.
392), the age of consent is moved to between 12 and 16, and offenses are graded downward
as the age of the victim increases.
11. Generally, the state and common laws protecting marriage are abolished or penalties
reduced. For example, consensual fornication, adultery, and sodomy are legal in many states.
Bestiality and necrophilia are eliminated or moved from the sex offenses section to "cruelty
to animals" or "abuse of a corpse."
12. The new criminal law code is presented to the state legislature as "merely technical
improvement'' without m,Yor substantive change, and is passed in whole or significant part.
THe 1955 aMeRican law insTiTUTe Model penal code eliMinaTes coMMon
law To RedUce/end sex offense laws and paRole all cRiMinals
caUsal effecT of Kinseys fRaUdUlenT daTa
fornication & cohabitation
(normal and harmless)
obscenity
exhibitionism
(normal & harmless)
Violent Soft/Hard
Pornography, Impotence
Hetero/Homo
Adult & Child
Pornography &
Prostitution
Enterprises
File, TV, Video Games,
Internet & Library Porn
Pornographic Media,
Political, Judicial,
Education,
Special Interest
Groups, Lobby,
Bribe, Blackmail,
& Coersion
sodomy,
Beastiality
(normal &
harmless)
67% Sex
Victims Under
age 16,
64% of
Forcible
Sodomy Victims
Boys under 12
Adult/Child Hetero/
Homo
Drugs & Alcohol
Abuse,
Therapies
Medical, Religious,
Police Legal,
Legislative, Judicial,
Teacher Training,
Appointments
prostitution,
solicitation
(normal & harmless)
Out of Wedlock
illigitimacy
Absent Fathers, Child
Criminals, Sadistic
Hetero/Homo Acts,
Prostitution, Rape, etc.
25 New Venereal
Diseases, Hep B,
AIDS, etc.
1991 Gov. Mandated
Infant Hep B Vaccine
Gov. Seeks to Mandate
Other STD Vaccines
with Parental Consent
Medical Market for for At-Risk Youth Justifes Title X, The
Emancipated Minor, School Condom Programs, Abortion with
Parental Consent, etc.
DivorceNo Fault
Child Custody to
More Affuent Spouse
Welfare,
Povertization of
Women/Children,
Live-in Boyfriends,
Pornographic
Incestuous Abuse
Cervical Cancer,
Breast Cancer,
Sterility in
Young Women
Partial Birth,
Euthanasia,
Cloning, Fetal
Harvesting Experiment
failed promiscuity experiment: increases welfare costs, failed programs, state control of children and social anarchy
Sex Therapy
Surrogates
Gov/Private Agencies
Created to Treat
Youth & Adult
Disorders, Criminals,
Sick & Insane
seduction
(normal &
harmless)
adultery
(normal &
harmless)
alienation
of affection,
Breach of
promise
(normal &
harmless)
abortion
(normal &
harmless)
contributing
to the
delinquency
of a Minor &
incest
(normal & harmless)
Consent Rules:
Peer Sex is Play
not Rape
Hostile Workplace,
Homicide, Rough Sex
Defense, etc.
sodomy, Rape,
wife/child
Rape
(normal & harmless)
Mandated School
Hetero/Homo, Sex Ed.,
Death Education,
Increases Youth Suicide,
Sex Abuse, Sex Therapy
Industry to Aid Youth
As Child Sex Activity
Increases, Scholarship &
Citizenship Decreases,
STDs & All Other
Dysfuctions Increase
weakens
or eliminates
laws
S
e
x
u
a
l
S
a
b
o
t
a
g
e
[
2
]
.
i
n
d
d
1
9
8
4
/
1
9
/
1
0
5
:
1
0
:
1
6
P
M
Home About Dr. Reisman Links Contact
Search ||
Hot Button Issues The Kinsey Coverup Proposed Bill Laws Reisman Won Playboy Libel Suit
Reisman Articles External Articles Reference White Papers Books Broadcast Events
Playboy Lost to Reisman!
Reisman Child Porn Study Defeats Playboy's Dutch Libel Suit
In 1994, Playboy sued Dutch tv broadcaster EO to demand the
retraction of statements by Dr. Reisman in one of their
broadcasts. On air, Reisman essentially accused Playboy of
producing child pornography, based on the study of three
decades of its publications. Playboy ultimately lost the lawsuit.
Jump to sections below:
The broadcast
The verdict
Headlines from Holland
Related articles
The broadcast
On September 17, 1994, EO, a Dutch public broadcasting association, aired an episode of its news and current
aairs tv series Tijdsein (EN: Time Signal), which featured a 20 minute section on sexual abuse in the United States.
Judith Reisman was interviewed for this production, in particular concerning the results from her study for the
Department of Justice. This research was sponsored by its Oce of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
Project No. 84-JN-AX-K007, and carried out from February 1984 to November 1985, with results published in
1987.
"The research was an investigative analysis of PLAYBOY,
PENTHOUSE and HUSTLER over the period of December 1953 to
December 1984 to examine for nonviolent, violent, and criminal
image portrayal and scenario involvement of children. The
research reported the ndings of 14,854 images of crime and
violence and 6,004 images of children (with the predominate
group being girls between ages 3 to 11 years) as part of the
overall sexual and violent scenario. There were 989 sexual
scenarios which included children actively involved with adults;
and each magazine portrayed children as unharmed and/or
benignly aected by the child/adult sex."
-- Role of Pornography and Media Violence in Family Violence,
Sexual Abuse and Exploitation, and Juvenile Delinquency -
NCJRS Abstract
See also: Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy,
Penthouse and Hustler
October 3, 1994, EO is subpoenaed by Playboy, demanding retractions be published in the next episode of
Tijdsein, as well as printed in the broadcasting association's tv guide. They charged unauthorized use of their
brand and that Playboy had been "brought into the news by the EO in an unnecessarily hurtful and damaging
way", claiming they had "suered considerable damage". A hearing was held on October 11.
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/playboy.html 1 of 4
About EO
(Wikipedia; English)
"lies and slander" ... "Never is there an image of a child in the
magazine."
-- Jan Heemskerk, Chief Editor for Playboy in The Netherlands
"I assume that, in America, Playboy has long been
familiar with the views of Reisman. I would say to Mr.
Heemskerk: turn to America."
-- Andries Knevel, EO Director of Programming
"Playboy never will sue me in the USA, since
their deliberate child sex abuse methodology
would be proven in a court of law."
-- Judith A. Reisman, PhD
The verdict
Judge Bentinck ruled in Playboy's favor, only on the count of EO's use of three images of Playboy magazine
covers and three other Playboy images, without permission; a copyright violation. All other claims and demands
by Playboy were dismissed.
The judge could see no wrong in EO reporting Reisman's ndings, nor
that there was an obvious intent to harm Playboy in doing so, adding
also that EO's journalists had taken great care in researching and
producing the piece.
In paragraph nine of the ruling, Reisman's ndings are referred to as:
"the uncontested factual ndings of Dr. Reisman"
About Dutch Courts
Eectively, the judge only ruled EO could not re-air the episode for as far as works by Playboy are shown. On
not giving Playboy a chance to voice its opinion in the particular broadcast and the fact that Playboy doesn't
agree with Reisman's ndings the judge simply stated that "Playboy and associates, being publishers
themselves, possess ample access to the media to combat any opinion they deem incorrect."
Case details
"Playboy" in this case comprises the following plaintis:
PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INC., based in Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, and
UITGEVERIJ SPAARNESTAD B.V., based in Haarlem, The Netherlands
versus "EO", Evangelische Omroep, the defendant in this case:
VERENIGING TOT BEVORDERING VAN DE EVANGELIEVERKONDIGING VIA RADIO EN TELEVISIE DE
EVANGELISCHE OMROEP, based in Hilversum, The Netherlands
Amsterdam District Court case number: KG 94/2529Be
Read the full Dutch language verdict: HTML | PDF
Ruling: October 27, 1994
Hearing: October 11, 1994
Subpoena: October 3, 1994
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/playboy.html 2 of 4
Headlines from Holland
Playboy demands retraction of EO about incest
September 26, 1994, ANP
Playboy threatens EO with lawsuit
September 27, 1994, NRC
EO prosecuted
September 28, 1994, Het Parool
"Playboy does in fact print child pictures
and cartoons"
October 11, 1994, ANP
EO does not have to retract
statements about Playboy
October 27, 1994, ANP
Playboy loses suit
against EO
October 28, 1994, AD
Read original Dutch language press coverage here (sources)
Related articles
Playboy's Global Marketing of Tweens to Supply the Global Sex Industry (January 18, 2012)
Judith Reisman - Swept into Controversy (December 11, 2011)
Study Reveals Porn Magazines Promote Sexual Abuse of Children (December 11, 2011)
Study Says Porn Magazines Promote Children As Sexual Objects (December 11, 2011)
The Bizarre Pitch For 'The Playboy Club': It's All About Female Empowerment? (October 4, 2011)
When Playboy sex doesn't sell (October 1, 2011)
All Pornography is Homoerotic (August 14, 2011)
Parents Television Council: Help Put a Stop to the Mainstreaming of Pornography! (August 13, 2011)
Women's Groups Appeal to NBC's Legal and Corporate Responsibility Asking for a Halt to 'The Playboy Club' (June
22, 2011)
Judith Reisman on Focal Point (June 16, 2011)
Playboy vs EO - Dutch verdict (June 7, 2011)
Dutch Press Coverage of Playboy vs EO (June 4, 2011)
Convergence: Porn, Addiction & the Impact on Youth, Women & Families (May 30, 2011)
William Buckley Interviews Hugh Hefner on Firing Line (1966) (November 9, 2010)
Child pornographer, Larry Flynt, et al: a clear and present danger to children (October 31, 2010)
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/playboy.html 3 of 4
Playboy Historically Pandered Sex Abuse by Health Professionals (April 18, 2010)
Hello Bunny! (January 18, 2010)
Playboy's Role in Incest (October 22, 2009)
Playboy's Mother Marge Cartoon (October 15, 2009)
Senate Candidate Franken in Playboy's "We Won!" Issue [PDF] (February 4, 2009)
Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler - Summary (February 4, 2009)
DOJ Abstract of OJJDP Report: Role of Pornography and Media Violence in Family Violence, Sexual Abuse and
Exploitation, and Juvenile Delinquency (April 4, 2006)
Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler (August 15, 2005)
Judith A. Reisman, PhD || Atom / RSS 1.0 / RSS 2.0 / RSD || Website design by Alicia Ramirez
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/playboy.html 4 of 4