The document is a statement by a man responding to false allegations made by Lena Sclove regarding their sexual relationship. It summarizes that they engaged in consensual sexual activities for three weeks, including on the night in question. It details how he was found responsible by Brown University for sexual misconduct and suspended for a year, despite disagreeing with the decision. It describes how Lena and her supporters protested his planned return, leading the university newspaper to identify him and spread inaccurate details. As a result, he withdrew his petition to return to Brown due to a "mob rule" atmosphere replacing due process. He maintains the truth that their relationship was consensual and she made untruthful claims about him.
Original Description:
Original Title
Statement Responding to False Allegations by Lena Sclove
The document is a statement by a man responding to false allegations made by Lena Sclove regarding their sexual relationship. It summarizes that they engaged in consensual sexual activities for three weeks, including on the night in question. It details how he was found responsible by Brown University for sexual misconduct and suspended for a year, despite disagreeing with the decision. It describes how Lena and her supporters protested his planned return, leading the university newspaper to identify him and spread inaccurate details. As a result, he withdrew his petition to return to Brown due to a "mob rule" atmosphere replacing due process. He maintains the truth that their relationship was consensual and she made untruthful claims about him.
The document is a statement by a man responding to false allegations made by Lena Sclove regarding their sexual relationship. It summarizes that they engaged in consensual sexual activities for three weeks, including on the night in question. It details how he was found responsible by Brown University for sexual misconduct and suspended for a year, despite disagreeing with the decision. It describes how Lena and her supporters protested his planned return, leading the university newspaper to identify him and spread inaccurate details. As a result, he withdrew his petition to return to Brown due to a "mob rule" atmosphere replacing due process. He maintains the truth that their relationship was consensual and she made untruthful claims about him.
Statement Responding to False Allegations by Lena Sclove
Lena Sclove has been painting a false picture of what happened between us on the night of August 2, 2013. For three weeks before that date, we had been engaged in a consensual sexual relationship, and our activities that night were also consensual. I never acted forcefully in any way towards Lena. She was a friend and someone I cared about. Browns three-member Student Conduct Board, applying a more likely than not standard, decided I was responsible for sexual misconduct as defined by Browns disciplinary code. I disagreed with the decision and would have challenged it if I could. But an appeal on grounds of innocence is not allowed under Browns rules, and I had no choice but to accept a one-year suspension. I left campus on October 18. On April 22, after meeting all the conditions Brown placed on me (including weekly counseling and a no-contact order), I petitioned Brown for readmission. I was given every indication I would be permitted to resume my studies in September 2014. But Lena and her supporters staged a rally outside Browns gates to protest my return. The student newspaper, The Brown Daily Herald, wrote about the rally and identified me by name, a gross violation of journalistic principles and my privacy, since no criminal charges were ever filed against me. Online media sites repeated the Daily Heralds error-riddled story and amplified the false allegations made about me during the rally. My instinct was to push forward with my petition to come back to Brown, but it soon became clear that mob rule had taken the place of due process, and that if I returned to school I would be the target of more rallies and more false accusations and my ability to pursue my studies would be impossible. Reluctantly, I concluded that I couldnt return to Brown under such circumstances, and I withdrew my petition. Having succeeded in driving me from Brown, Lena now seems determined to inflict as much damage to my reputation as possible. For my part, I will continue to state the truth: that Lena and I had a consensual relationship, including on the night of August 2; that I was never violent toward her in any way; and that her claims about me are not truthful. I hope the current debate over campus sexual assault policies will lead to reform of a student disciplinary process that is fundamentally flawed and that serves neither the accusers nor the accused. ###