A complete analysis conducted on the financial statements and status of Sun Microsystems exposed key issues determined to be of great import to shareholders. After examining the research findings and analysis, it seems that Sun Microsystems finances have not maintained a steady incline. In fact, it had definitely experienced some highs and lows in its return on investment and stockholders equity over a four- year evaluation spanning the years 1998 through 2001. In an effort to decipher the problems within the companys operations, data from the following reports and ratios offered considerable clues. To collect relevant data, the annual percentage change in net income per common share diluted, net income/net revenues, the major income statement accounts to net revenues, return on stockholders equity, the price/earnings (P/E) ratio, and the book values per share for each year numbers were examined. In order for Sun Microsystems to see a greater return in its bottom line assets, it must consider an alternative approach in operating its organization. The following is a comprehensive view of the finances of Sun Microsystems from 1998-2001. Sun Microsystems has experienced significant fluctuations in performance. The annual percentage change in net income per common share diluted and profit margins were as follows: Table 1 Percentage change in net income per common share-diluted 1999 $ .31 2000 $ .55 2001 $ .27 1998 $ .24 1999 $ .31 2000 $ .55 $ .07 $ .24 $-.28 +29.2% +77.4% -50.9%
Sun Microsystems saw tremendous growth in net income between 1999 and 2000 leading up to a sharp decline between 2000 and 2001. The income statements show increased revenues in 2001, contradicting the data above. Further analysis provides an explanation for the deceleration of income growth in spite of increased revenue. The ratios of several expenses to net revenues were taken for 2000 and 2001. Table 3 Percent of net revenue 2000 2001 Net revenues $15,721 $18,250 Cost of sales $7,549 48.02% $10,041 55.02% Research and development 1,630 10.37 2,016 11.05 S, G, and A 4,072 25.90 4,544 24.90 Provision for income taxes 917 5.83 603 3.30
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%). Ratios for return on assets and return on equity offer support for the loss in stockholders equity. Return on assets went from 13.1 in 2000 to 5.1 in 2001 and return on equity dropped from 25.4 in 2000 to 8.7 in 2001. Return on equity represents return on assets divided by the difference of 1 and debts/assets. This supports the conclusion that cost of sales, a reflection of asset investment, is most responsible for the lackluster net income of 2001. The price/earnings (P/E) ratio further demonstrates the fluctuation in value to stockholders from 1998 to 2001. Table 4 P/E = Stock price/net income per common share-diluted (EPS) 1998 1999 2000 2001 P/E 46.9 54.0 51.8 35.2
The sharp decline in performance caused investors to pay a lower multiple for the stock. The lower P/E in 2001 suggests again that the return on stockholders investment is small for revenue generated in that year and stock prices will decline accordingly since P/E multiplied by earnings per share determines stock price. Finally, consider the ratio of price (stock price) to book value (net worth per share) from 1998 to 2001.
Table 5 Price to book value = Stock price/book value 1998 1999 2000 2001 P/BV 9.53 10.81 12.45 2.91
Once again, the sharp fall off in price to book value between 2000 and 2001 can be attributed to the decline in performance (and the impact on the stock prices). Book value was going up, but the ratio declined sharply due to the declining stock prices. The price/book ratio shows that the stock at Sun Microsystems was not as highly valued in the market in 2001. The difference between the net worth per share of the company and what the company is able to sell shares for greatly decreased. Changes in the industry as a whole or changes in consumer habits could be contributing factors to the change in stock values experienced at Sun Microsystems. Internally, Sun Microsystems needs to explore ways to maximize profit and minimize costs of producing goods. Business Alternatives Looking at the financial statement analysis for Sun Microsystems, one can definitely see the companys strengths and their needs. The balance sheet indicates what the firm owns and how these assets are financed in the form of liabilities or ownership interest and the statement of income is the major device for measuring the profitability of a firm over time (Block and Hirt, 2005, p.25, 28). The financial statements analysis shows that Sun Microsystems has done very well and made it through the challenge from 2000 to 2001. The stock prices dropped drastically from 2000 to 2001 and there was a huge increase in cost of sales resulting in the recommendation to outsource some of their employees to compensate for some deficit. Sun Microsystems is a very aggressive company and the employees have fought to bring the costs down as they continued to bring exciting new products to the market (Block and Hirt, 2005, p. 82). Outsourcing will allow Sun Microsystems to put more concentration into the products that they have while they make sure they have all their finances in order for the years to come. The revenue growth of 16% for Sun Microsystems was very significant for the business (Block and Hirt, 2005, p.82). Outsourcing some employees gives Sun Microsystems an opportunity to have a consulting firm come in and evaluate their business plan. This business plan will potentially lead Sun Microsystems to long lasting success. A business plan renews their vision, strategic focus and adds value to their target market segments. It also provides the systematic plan for improving sales, gross margin, and profitability (Bplans.com, 2007). Conclusion Sun Microsystems needs to implement a new plan quickly to save its company from going under as its stockholders equity continues to decrease. It has experienced a decline in its net income between 2000 and 2001. The P/E in 2001 determined that the return on stockholders investment was rather small when compared to the amount of revenue it generated. Stock prices also declined. Not all changes were specific to Sun Microsystems, as some of these changes were industry wide. If Sun Microsystems was to outsource some of its employees, the money saved overall would appeal to its stockholders. Consequently, outsourcing will allow for more emphasis and focus on product development, which can ultimately increase revenue. Sun Microsystems should consider bringing in a consulting firm to look at its current business plan. Potentially, by doing so, the consulting firm can sift through possible problems and replace them with solutions. Restructuring the business plan will bring a newfound energy to the company by renewing its vision and focusing on the appropriate market segment.
References Block, S. B., & Hirt, G. A. (2005). Foundations of Financial Management. [University of Phoenix Custom Edition e-text]. New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from University of Phoenix, rEsource, MBA503-Introduction to Finance and Accounting Course Web site. Bplans.com. (2007). Executive summary. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.bplans.com
CP 3-2. Sun Microsystems is a leading supplier of computer related products, including servers, workstations, storage devices, and network switches.
In the letter to stockholders as part of the 2001 annual report, President and CEO Scott G. McNealy offered the following remarks?
Fiscal 2001 was clearly a mixed bag for Sun, the industry, and the economy as a whole. Still, we finished with revenue growth of 16 percentand thats significant. We believe its a good indication that Sun continued to pull away from the pack and gain market share. For that, we owe a debt of gratitude to our employees worldwide, who aggressively brought costs downeven as they continued to bring exciting new products to market.
The statement would not appear to be telling you enough. For example, McNealy says the year was a mixed bag with revenue growth of 16 percent. But what about earnings? You can delve further by examining the income statement in Figure 1. Also, for additional analysis of other factors, consolidated balance sheet(s) are presented in Figure 1.
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Summary Consolidated Statement of Income (in millions)
2001
Dollars 2000
Dollars 1999 Dollars 1998 Dollars
Net revenues $18,250 $15,721 $11,806 $9,862
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 10,041 7,549 5,670 4,713
Research and development 2,016 1,630 1,280 1,029
Selling, general and administrative 4,544 4,072 3,196 2,826
Goodwill amortization 261 65 19 4
In-process research and development 77 12 121 176
Total costs and expenses 16,939 13,328 10,286 8,748
Operating income 1,311 2,393 1,520 1,114
Gain (loss) on strategic investments (90) 208 -- --
Interest income, net 363 170 85 48
Litigation settlement -- -- -- --
Income before taxes 1,584 2,771 1,605 1,162
Provision for income taxes 603 917 575 407
Cumulative effect of change in
Accounting principle, net
(54)
--
--
--
Net income $ 927 $ 1,854 $ 1,030 $ 755
Net income per common share
Diluted
$ 0.27
$ 0.55
$ 0.31
$ 0.24
Shares used in the calculation of
Net income per common share
Diluted
3,417
3,379
3,282
3,180
CP 3-2. Continued
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions)
2001 2000
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,472 $ 1,849
Short-term investments 387 626
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $410 in 2001
and $534 in 2000
2,955
2,690
Inventories 1,049 557
Deferred tax assets 1,102 673
Prepaids and other current assets 969 482
Total current assets 7,934 6,877
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,697 2,095
Long-term investments 4,677 4,496
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $349 in 2001
and $88 in 2000
2,041
163
Other assets, net 832 521
$18,181 $14,152
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings $ 3 $ 7
Accounts payable 1,050 924
Accrued payroll-related liabilities 488 751
Accrued liabilities and other 1,374 1,155
Deferred revenues and customer deposits 1,827 1,289
Warranty reserve 314 211
Income taxes payable 90 209
Total current liabilities 5,146 4,546
Deferred income taxes 744 577
Long-term debt and other obligations 1,705 1,720
Total debt $ 7,595 $ 6,843
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10 shares authorized
(1 share which has been designated as Series A Preferred
participating stock); no shares issued and outstanding
--
--
Common stock and additional paid-in-capital, $0.00067
par value, 7,200 shares authorized; issued: 3,536 shares
in 2001 and 3,495 shares in 2000
6,238
2,728
CP 3-2. Continued
Treasury stock, at cost: 288 shares in 2001 and 301
shares in 2000
(2,435)
(1,438)
Deferred equity compensation (73) (15)
Retained earnings 6,885 5,959
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (29) 75
Total stockholders equity 10,586 7,309
$18,181
$14,152
CP Questions
1. Referring to Exhibit 1, compute the annual percentage change in net income per common share- diluted (2nd numerical line from the bottom) for 1998-1999, 1999-2000, and 2000-2001.
2. Also in Exhibit 1, compute net income/net revenue (sales) for each of the four years. Begin with 1998.
3. What is the major reason for the change in the answer for question 2 between 2000 and 2001? To answer this question for each of the two years, take the ratio of the following major income statement accounts to net revenues (sales).
Cost of sales
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative expense
Provision for income tax
4. Compute return on stockholders equity for 2000 and 2001 using data from Exhibits 1 and 2.
5. Analyze your results to question 4 more completely by computing ratios 1, 2a, 2b, and 3b (all from this chapter) for 2000 and 2001. Actually the answer to ratio 1 can be found as part of the answer to question 2, but it is helpful to look at it again.
What do you think was the main contributing factor to the change in return on stockholders equity between 2000 and 2001? Think in terms of the Du Pont system of analysis.
CP 3-2. Continued
6. The average stock prices for each of the four years shown in Exhibit 1 were as follows:
1998 11
1999 16
2000 28
2001 9
a. Compute the price/earnings (P/E) ratio for each year. That is, take the stock price shown above and divide by net income per common stock-dilution from Exhibit 1.
b. Why do you think the P/E has changed from its 2000 level to its 2001 level? A brief review of P/E ratios can be found under the topic of Price-Earnings Ratio Applied to Earnings per Share in Chapter 2.
7. The book values per share for the same four years discussed in the preceding question were:
1998 $1.18
1999 $1.55
2000 $2.29
2001 $3.26
a. Compute the ratio of price to book value for each year.
b. Is there any dramatic shift in the ratios worthy of note?
CP Solution:
1. Percentage change in net income per common share-diluted
1999 $ .31 2000 $ .55 2001 $ .27
1998 $ .24 1999 $ .31 2000 $ .55
$ .07 $ .24 $.28
+29.2% +77.4% 50.9%
2. Profit margin
1998 1999 2000 2001
7.66% 8.72% 11.79% 5.08%
3. Percent of net revenue
2000 2001
Net revenues $15,721 $18,250
Cost of sales 7,549 48.02% 10,041 55.02%
Research and
development 1,630 10.37 2,016 11.05
S, G, and A 4,072 25.90 4,544 24.90
Provision for
income taxes 917 5.83 603 3.30
The main problem between 2000 and 2001 was the increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net revenue (48.02% to 55.02%).
CP 3-2. Continued
4. Return on stockholders equity
2000 2001
Net income $1,854 $ 927
Stockholders equity 7,309 10,586
25.37% 8.76%
5. 2000 2001
1. 11.79% 5.08%
2.a. 13.1% 5.10%
2.b. 11.79% x 1.11 5.08% x 1.00
13.09% 5.08%
3.b.
25.37% 8.73%
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
CP 3-2. Continued
6.a. P/E = Stock price/net income per common share-diluted (EPS)
1998 1999 2000 2001
P/E 46.9 54.0 51.8 35.2
b. The sharp decline in performance caused investors to pay a lower multiple for the stock.
7.a. Price to book value = Stock price/book value
1998 1999 2000 2001
P/BV 9.53 10.81 12.45 2.91
b. Once again, the sharp fall off in price to book value between 2000 and 2001 can be attributed to the decline in performance (and the impact on the stock prices). Book value was going up, but the ratio declined sharply due to the declining stock prices.
Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Mr. William Thompson Branch Chief Re: Sempra Energy