Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc.

18
Case 3:07-cv-01658-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 Case No. C07-1658 EMC
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10 v.
United States District Court

11 SAP AG, et al.,


For the Northern District of California

12
Defendants.
13 ___________________________________/

14
15
NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO
16 A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

17 The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a United States District
18
Judge because either:
19
(x) One or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District
20
Judge or has not consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, or
21
22 ( ) One or more of the parties has sought a type of judicial action (e.g., a temporary

23 restraining order) that a United States Magistrate Judge may not take without the consent of all
24
parties, the necessary consents have not been secured, and time is of the essence.
25
///
26
27
28

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-01658-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 Any matters presently set before Magistrate Judge Chen, will be taken off calendar and
2
counsel and/or parties are to contact the courtroom deputy for the reassigned district judge for a new date.
3
Dated: May 7, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
4 United States District Court
5
6
7 ______________________________
By: Betty Fong, Deputy Clerk
8
9
10
United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

You might also like