Oracle Corporation Et Al v. SAP AG Et Al - Document No. 18
Oracle Corporation Et Al v. SAP AG Et Al - Document No. 18
18
Case 3:07-cv-01658-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 Case No. C07-1658 EMC
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10 v.
United States District Court
12
Defendants.
13 ___________________________________/
14
15
NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO
16 A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17 The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a United States District
18
Judge because either:
19
(x) One or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District
20
Judge or has not consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, or
21
22 ( ) One or more of the parties has sought a type of judicial action (e.g., a temporary
23 restraining order) that a United States Magistrate Judge may not take without the consent of all
24
parties, the necessary consents have not been secured, and time is of the essence.
25
///
26
27
28
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-01658-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
1 Any matters presently set before Magistrate Judge Chen, will be taken off calendar and
2
counsel and/or parties are to contact the courtroom deputy for the reassigned district judge for a new date.
3
Dated: May 7, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
4 United States District Court
5
6
7 ______________________________
By: Betty Fong, Deputy Clerk
8
9
10
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28