Immovable Property Place of Supply
Immovable Property Place of Supply
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION
Indirect Taxation and Tax administration
Value Added Tax
Published XXX
taxud.c.1(2015)2185984
Explanatory notes
on
EU VAT place of supply rules on services
connected with immovable property that
enter into force in 2017
Disclaimer: These explanatory notes are not legally binding and only contain practical
and informal guidance about how EU law should be applied on the basis of the views of
the Commissions Directorate General for Taxation and Customs Union.
2/53
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
Purpose of the particular rule on services connected with immovable property ...... 9
1.4.
Nature of the particular rule on services connected with immovable property ........ 9
1.5.
1.6.
1.7.
1.8.
1.9.
1.10. Interaction between the particular rule of Article 47 of the VAT Directive and the
concept of fixed establishment recognised for VAT purposes ............................... 12
1.11. Interaction between the rules on the place of supply and VAT exemptions .......... 12
1.12. Irrelevance of concepts and definitions of national legislations for the application
of the particular rule ............................................................................................... 13
1.13. Relevant legal acts .................................................................................................. 13
PART 2 SPECIFIC
2.1.
2.1.3.
What is meant by fixed to or in the ground (above or below sea level) and
which cannot be easily dismantled or moved? ........................................... 17
2.1.4.
2.1.6.
2.3.
How do Article 31a(1), 31a(2) and 31a(3) interact? How should they be read
together? ........................................................................................................ 23
2.2.2.
2.2.3.
2.2.4.
2.2.5.
Does the quality of the recipient of the services affect the qualification of the
services? ........................................................................................................ 25
2.2.6.
Does the location of the recipient of the services affect the qualification of
the services? .................................................................................................. 25
2.2.7
2.3.2.
2.3.2.1. What is the legal regime applicable to studies made with regards to an
immovable property of which the (precise) location is not yet known? ... 27
2.3.3.
2.3.6.1. Which categories of works and agricultural services enter the scope of
Article 31a(2)(e)? ..................................................................................... 31
2.3.7.
5/53
6/53
7/53
PART 1
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON SERVICES CONNECTED WITH
IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES
1.1.
Historical background
1.
Under European VAT legislation, the place of taxation of services connected with
immovable property is defined by a particular rule laid down under Article 47 of
the VAT Directive1. This rule provides that the place of supply of services
connected with immovable property shall be where the immovable property is
located.
2.
In the process of revising the place of supply rules on services which started with a
first proposal from the European Commission in 2003 and resulted in the adoption
of Council Directive 2008/8/EC2 the Council decided to keep the particular rule on
the place of taxation of services connected with immovable property.
3.
4.
1.2.
International background
5.
Particular place of supply rules on services connected with immovable property are
applied not only within the European Union but also in some third countries. At
EU level, this particular rule is in line with the implementation of the destination
principle. At international level, it has been commonly agreed (reference to OECD
guidelines to be inserted after formal adoption) that such particular rules using the
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
(OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1).
Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the place
of supply of services (OJ L 44, 20.2.2008, p. 11).
The VAT Committee is an advisory committee set up under Article 398 of the VAT Directive to promote
the uniform application of the provisions of the VAT Directive. It has not been attributed any legislative
powers and cannot take legally binding decisions but can give guidance.
The guidelines (currently) developed by the OECD provide that taxing rights over
services and intangibles directly connected with immovable property may be
allocated to the jurisdiction where the immovable property is located when the use
of such specific rule would lead to significantly better results than the use of the
relevant general rule with regard to:
- neutrality;
- efficiency of compliance and administration;
- certainty and simplicity;
- effectiveness;
- fairness.
1.3.
7.
The purpose of the particular place of supply rule on services connected with
immovable property is to ensure taxation at the place of consumption of the
service. This objective should be recalled in all situations where the practical
implementation of the legislation raises difficulties. Such disputable situations
should always be resolved so as to ensure that the VAT tax revenue accrues to the
Member State where the service is actually consumed taking into account that
services connected with immovable property are considered to be consumed at the
place where the property is located. Interested parties can therefore not choose to
circumvent Article 47 of the VAT Directive by indicating in their contractual
arrangements that services provided under this contract should rather be subject to
the general place of supply rules.
1.4.
8.
The rule contained in Article 47 of the VAT Directive is a particular rule and not
an exception to the general B2B and B2C place of supply rules contained in
Articles 44 and 45 of the VAT Directive. It falls under Title V Place of taxable
transactions, Chapter 3 Place of supply of services, Section 3 Particular
provisions and should not be interpreted as an exception to the general rules.5
9.
10.
11.
See CJEU cases C-166/05 Heger Rudi; C-41/04 Levob Verzekeringen and OV Bank.
9/53
In some circumstances, it can occur that conditions for application of two or more
particular rules are fulfilled. In such cases, the rule better assuring taxation at the
actual place of consumption should be applied7.
1.5.
13.
14.
1.6.
15.
In accordance with the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European
Union (hereinafter CJEU), for VAT purposes every supply must normally be
regarded as distinct and independent8. However, where a transaction consists of
several elements, it should be assessed whether it should be treated as a single
supply or as several distinct and independent supplies9.
16.
A supply must be regarded as a single supply where two or more elements or acts
supplied by the taxable person are so closely linked that they form, objectively, a
single, indivisible economic supply, which it would be artificial to split10. The
essential features of the supply must be ascertained in order to determine whether
the customer, being a typical consumer, receives several distinct principal supplies
or a single supply11.
See CJEU case C-155/12 RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland, paragraph 29.
See CJEU cases C-392/11 Field Fisher Waterhouse, C-111/05 Aktiebolaget NN, paragraph 22; C-461/08
Don Bosco Onroerend Goed, paragraph 35; and C-276/09 Everything Everywhere, paragraph 21.
10
See CJEU cases C-41/04 Levob Verzekeringen and OV Bank, paragraph 22, and C-276/09 Everything
Everywhere, paragraphs 24 and 25.
11
See for example judgment in CJEU case C-349/96 Card Protection Plan.
10/53
Moreover, that is also the case where one or more supplies constitute a principal
supply and the other supply or supplies constitute one or more ancillary supplies
which share the tax treatment of the principal supply. In particular, a supply must
be regarded as ancillary to a principal supply if it does not constitute for customers
an end in itself but a means of better enjoying the principal service supplied12.
18.
1.7.
19.
20.
Conversely, in all other scenarios where the service is linked with a specific
immovable property, it should be duly assessed whether that service has a
sufficiently direct connection with immovable property as defined under
Article 31a.
21.
1.8.
22.
12
See CJEU cases C-349/96 Card Protection Plan, paragraph 29; C-41/04 Levob Verzekeringen and OV
Bank, paragraph 20; C-111/05 Aktiebolaget NN, paragraph 22; C-276/09 Everything Everywhere,
paragraphs 21 and 22; and C-497/09 Bog and Others, paragraph 53.
13
23.
24.
However, each Member State may provide that, when the supplier is not
established in its territory, the person liable for payment of the VAT due is the
person to whom the service is supplied (see Article 194 of the VAT Directive).
1.10. Interaction between the particular rule of Article 47 of the VAT Directive and
the concept of fixed establishment recognised for VAT purposes
25.
26.
1.11. Interaction between the rules on the place of supply and VAT exemptions
27.
When examining the interaction between the rules on the place of supply and the
rules dealing with VAT exemptions, it should not be forgotten that the general
approach in the EU VAT system is to first identify the correct place of supply of a
12/53
29.
Therefore, for the purposes of identifying the Member State in which VAT is due
on services connected with immovable property, the assessment has to be based on
the definitions given in the VAT Implementing Regulation and not on definitions
given under the national law of each Member State.
31.
All relevant legal provisions are cited at the end of the explanatory notes in the
wording applicable as from 1 January 2017.
32.
13/53
PART 2
SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS ON PROVISIONS OF COUNCIL
IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) NO 1042/2013 RELEVANT TO
SERVICES CONNECTED WITH IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
2.1.
Article 13b
For the application of Directive 2006/112/EC, the following shall be regarded as
immovable property14:
33.
The ruling of the CJEU in the Fonden Marselisborg Lystbdehavn case15 has
greatly inspired the definition of immovable property provided for under
Article 13b of the VAT Implementing Regulation. Regarding the exemption for
leasing or letting of immovable property provided for under Article 135(1)(l) of
the VAT Directive, the Advocate General in that case16 stated that immovable
property can be defined as a specific part of the earths surface, including the
buildings firmly constructed thereon, over which title and possession can be
created.
34.
By referring to four categories - from points (a) to (d) - that are to be regarded as
immovable property, Article 13b is more detailed than the jurisprudence in
defining the concept of immovable property which is meant to distinguish
immovable properties from tangible movable properties.
35.
While the scope of the concept of immovable property should always be assessed
only by reference to the definition provided for in the VAT Implementing
Regulation, it is worth understanding how this definition has been construed.
36.
On the one hand there are goods that cannot move or be moved (e.g. land,
building). These goods are immovable goods and would be covered by
Article 13b(a) and (b). On the other hand, there are goods that can move or be
moved, but which will be regarded as immovable goods because they are closely
linked to or integrated in an immovable good (e.g. lifts, doors, windows) and
could fall under Article 13b(b), (c) or (d).
37.
14
Emphasis has been put on elements in bold simply to facilitate the reading of the document.
15
16
See point 30 of the opinion of Advocate General delivered on 14 October 2004 in CJEU case C-428/02
Fonden Marselisborg Lystbdehavn.
14/53
38.
2.1.1.1.
39.
The reference to a specific part of the earth means that what could be considered
as immovable property consists of clearly identified or identifiable areas of the
earth over which title and possession can be created. The wording specific does
not restrict the scope of the term earth which is broad. The reference to the earth,
either on or below its surface, indeed includes the soil itself and everything which
is on it and also what is below it, that is to say the undersoil.
40.
The soil of the earth encompasses any piece of land, including the portion of land
covered by water, i.e. the sea, ocean, rivers, lakes.
41.
Also reference is made to what is on the surface of the earth. Given the context of
the provision, not everything that is simply on the soil will be considered as
immovable, it also has to be incorporated to the ground or rooted in it. Therefore,
this provision will notably include trees and crops (it is to be noted that because
these have roots in the ground they are also covered as being below the surface of
the earth) as long as they remain attached to the ground.
42.
A similar reasoning should apply to waters covering the earth like lakes, rivers and
other inland waterways. Although water is capable of moving, it should be
considered as immovable.
43.
The undersoil of the earth covers everything that is under the ground. Therefore,
oils wells, water tables and other elements that are under the ground (also ground
under the water) are considered as immovable. As long as their components are not
removed from the underground they shall be considered as part of the earth, that is
to say immovable property.
2.1.1.2.
44.
Taking into account the wording of Article 13b(a), only those immovable goods
over which title and possession can be created are covered by the definition of
immovable property.
45.
Although title and possession are concepts that are not defined for the purpose
of applying the VAT Directive, they should be commonly understood and not rely
on national definitions.
46.
To grasp their meaning, one should go back to the definition of a supply of goods
provided for in Article 14 of the VAT Directive. Indeed, it is reminded that the
purpose of Article 13b is to define the concept of immovable property which is
15/53
In line with this reasoning, what should be verified is whether the immovable
property is likely to be owned in the sense that somebody can dispose of it as if
he were the owner. This concept of ownership goes beyond the simple fact of
owing a title.
48.
49.
Moreover, the choice of the wording can be created means that goods can also
qualify as immovable property even if at the moment of the assessment nobody
holds actual title or possession over these goods. It is sufficient that title or
possession can be created over them. This reflects the potential broad scope of this
provision as only immovable goods that could not belong to anybody, in the sense
described above, would not be covered by the provision.
50.
Typically, title and possession over immovable goods are represented by a title
deed and/or a registration in an official registry. However, these constitute only the
proof of the title and possession. There could be different ways to evidence title
and possession and even without this proof, a test has to be run whether title and
possession can be created over the good.
51.
Article 13b(b) any building or construction fixed to or in the ground above or below sea
level which cannot be easily dismantled or moved;
2.1.2. What is meant by buildings and constructions under Article 13b(b)?
52.
A building can be defined as a (man-made) structure with a roof and walls such as
a house or factory.
17
See CJEU cases C-320/88 Shipping and Forwarding Enterprise Safe, paragraphs 7 to 9 and 12; C-25/03
HE, paragraph 64 ; C-88/09 Graphic Procd, paragraph 16.
16/53
The term construction has a broader meaning and encompasses other (man-made)
structures that do not qualify as a building. It includes civil engineering work, such
as roads, bridges, airfields, harbours, pipes installations for gas, water, sewerage,
industrial installations such as power generating plants, refineries, etc.
54.
2.1.3. What is meant by fixed to or in the ground (above or below sea level) and
which cannot be easily dismantled or moved?
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
In accordance with the case law of the CJEU, it is not necessary for a building or
construction to be indissociably incorporated into the ground in order to be
regarded as immovable property for the purposes of applying the rules on VAT.
What needs to be checked is whether the measures taken to immobilise cannot be
easily undone, that is to say without effort and considerable cost.
61.
In some cases, buildings and constructions are in their very nature movable goods
(e.g. prefab houses, kiosks, stalls, boats, caravans). However because they are
18
19
20
63.
However, in line with the physical criteria (without effort) and the economic one
(without considerable cost) provided by the CJEU to asses this aspect, the
following objective criteria could be taken on board. It should be noted that these
criteria are not exhaustive and depending on the situation, one could be more
accurate than the other or some criteria might need to be simultaneously fulfilled.
The need for professional skills. This refers to the tools, equipment, know-how,
etc. required to actually dismantle or move the building or construction
including the means needed to dismantle or move them (use of a crane, a trailer,
a truck, etc.);
The cost to dismantle or move the building or construction (cost compared to
the value of what is actually dismantled or moved);
The time needed to dismantle or move the building or construction.
64.
Additionally to the mentioned criteria, the intended use and the actual use of the
structure as a permanent or non-permanent location might also be relevant in this
respect. For instance, mobile snack bars temporary present in a same location (a
few days or weeks) should not be regarded as immovable property even though
they may be fixed to the ground, because the ties will just be sufficient enough to
immobilise them for the period of use but they are in fact provisional structures
easy to move or dismantle. Conversely, if they are used as a permanent location to
carry out an economic activity, they could be considered as not being easily
dismountable or movable by the fact that their attachment to the ground is
sufficient to allow them to be immobilised for a longer term.
Article 13b(c) any item that has been installed and makes up an integral part of a
building or construction without which the building or construction is incomplete, such
as doors, windows, roofs, staircases and lifts;
2.1.4. What is covered by Article 13b(c)?
65.
According to this point, any item that has been installed in a building or
construction is deemed to be immovable property when it makes up an integral
part of this building or construction. Integral means that without this item the
building or construction would be incomplete.
18/53
The effect of this provision is to consider any item, which is a movable good, as an
immovable property by the sole fact of making up an integral part of an
immovable property.
2.1.4.1.
67.
While point (b) would include items that are incorporated in the building or
construction during its construction/renovation/modification process (e.g. bricks,
cement, concrete, columns, beams), items referred to in point (c) are installed in
the building or construction.
68.
Incorporated items are constituents of the structural system (walls, floors, frame,
etc.) of a building or construction. Incorporated items also include those elements
that are built as infrastructure or superstructure of the building or construction.
This is for instance the case for the main sanitary installation (e.g. sewage systems,
water pipes, sewer connection, drainage systems), main heating/cooling/ventilation
installation (e.g. heating/cooling tubes, ventilation ducts), main electrical
installation (internal cabling), main home/building automation system installation.
69.
Installed items are not part of the main structure even if they can make up an
integral part of the building or construction.
70.
Installed items mean that they are placed or fixed in position ready for use in this
building or construction. They are usually attached or fixed to the building or
construction or they can simply be placed into it and they can generally be
removed or replaced.
71.
72.
A house without doors or windows would still be viewed as a house but doors and
windows, once they are installed, contribute to making this house complete, i.e. to
make this house habitable. The same goes for electrical, sanitary, kitchen or heat
installations other than the main installations covered under point (b). These items
are intended for the better (or even effective) use or enjoyment of the building or
construction as a building or construction. The installation of such items helps
complete the building or construction according to the structural features ordinarily
associated with a building or construction.
73.
19/53
74.
Items covered under point (c) are in contrast to items, equipment or machine,
meant under point (d), that fulfil a specific task or function independent of the
building or construction, but happen to be located within a building or construction
(this would be for instance the case of equipment or machinery intended to be
housed in a plant or factory). Their purpose, even if physically attached to
immovable property, is not for the better use or enjoyment of the immovable
property but to serve a specific purpose.
75.
However, the scope of points (c) and (d) may also overlap since the installation of
an item will in some situations be covered by point (c) as well as point (d). This
would be the case when items are an integral part of the building or construction
and cannot be moved without destroying or altering the building or construction
(e.g. marble staircases in a house).
76.
78.
This provision refers specifically to equipment and machine but any other item is
also covered by the provision.
79.
The effect of this provision is to consider any item, which is a movable good, as an
immovable property by the sole fact of being permanently installed in a building or
construction in such a way that it cannot be moved without destroying or altering
the building or construction.
80.
20/53
The reference to the wording permanently installed should not be seen as such as
a condition for the application of Article 13b(d) but rather as a means to
understand in which circumstances an item installed in a building or construction
could cause destruction or alteration of this building or construction when removed
from it. Indeed, what will be decisive in applying Article 13b(d), is whether the
item installed in a way to last in the building or construction would cause or not a
certain damage to this building or construction once removed.
82.
83.
The intention is a useful concept to determine at the outset whether the installation
is designed to attach the item to the building or construction, if not forever, at
least during its normal economic life. It is this attachment that should make it
impossible loosening the item without destruction or alteration of the building or
construction.
84.
When it comes to items installed in buildings or constructions used for the purpose
of an economic activity, one should preferably rely on an objective criterion to
determine which types of items are likely to be permanently installed. The
accounting concept of capital goods could be useful in some cases in order to
define the permanent character of items installed in buildings or constructions.
85.
Capital goods are durable goods that are used in the production of other goods or
of services. They are also called producer goods. This is in contrast to consumer
goods that are ready for consumption and are not utilized in any further
production.
86.
87.
Even if capital goods are designed to function on a permanent basis they have
economic/useful lives shorter than buildings or constructions in which they are
used. Permanent in the context of capital goods would mean that the item is used
as a production means during a certain time in the course of an economic activity
for the purpose of which it has been acquired.
88.
When the reference to capital goods is not appropriate, for instance when the item
might not qualify as such or when the item is permanently installed by a private
person (e.g. built-in cupboard in a room), the adverb permanently would need to
be interpreted on the basis of other criteria. Permanently would then refer to
items that are installed to serve a specific purpose in this building or construction
and that are intended to last or remain unchanged.
21/53
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
In this respect the amount of effort, time or cost needed for repairing the building
or construction could be useful in determining whether the alteration is significant
or not.
22/53
For example, a machine could be bolted to the floor of a factory to keep if from
shifting during production. It is possible to remove it by only removing the bolts
from the floor. There will naturally be some impact on the floor when the bolts are
removed. However this would not damage the building in a significant way.
2.2.
Article 31a
2.2.1. How do Article 31a(1), 31a(2) and 31a(3) interact? How should they be read
together?
100.
The aim of Article 31a is to help identifying services connected with immovable
property as defined in Article 47 of the VAT Directive. Article 31a(1) provides
guidance on what qualifies as services connected with immovable property.
Article 31a(2) gives a list of examples of services which should be seen as
connected with immovable property. Article 31a(3) presents a list of examples of
services which are not to be considered as connected with immovable property.
101.
102.
The structure of Article 31a and the interaction between Articles 31a(1), 31a(2)
and 31a(3) can be explained by the historical background of this provision and by
the will to provide legal certainty in a legislative framework characterised by
significant disparities among the national laws of Member States.
103.
It can be recalled that the examples listed under Articles 31a(2) and 31a(3) are the
result of discussions of the VAT Committee where Member States, faced with
divergent interpretations and risks of double or non-taxation, had agreed on a
number of guidelines on ad hoc basis.
104.
105.
It is important to note that Article 31a(2) does not restrict the scope of
Article 31a(1) it simply presents situations that the EU legislator considers, in
any event, as meeting with requirement of being connected with immovable
property.
23/53
The two provisions of Article 31a(1)(a) and 31a(1)(b) are not cumulative. In
practice, it is possible that some scenarios meet criteria from both provisions but it
is sufficient that requirements from only one of the two provisions are met for a
service to be qualified as connected with immovable property.
108.
As explained above the assessment of the service against the criteria contained in
Article 31a(1) should only take place where that service is not included in any of
the two lists from Articles 31a(2) and 31a(3).
It must be recalled that the rule provided for under Article 47 of the VAT Directive
is a particular rule and not an exception to the general rules of Articles 44 and 45.
Unlike exceptions, it should not be narrowly construed, nor should it be applied so
widely as to make the general rules become an exception22 (see also point 1.4 in
Part 1). Such an approach is coherent with the logic of the place of supply rules
which is to ensure taxation at the actual place of consumption of the service23.
110.
111.
It flows from the above that the assessment of the presence of a sufficiently direct
connection between the service provided and the immovable property must be
carried out in an objective manner against the criteria provided under
Article 31a(1)(a) and (b).
112.
The criteria under point (a) cover services where the outcome originates from the
immovable property (for example leasing of a building or obtaining the right to
fish within delimited territory) while under point (b) the immovable property is the
21
See opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak in CJEU case C-37/08 RCI Europe, in particular point 50.
22
See CJEU cases C-166/05 Heger Rudi and C-41/04 Levob Verzekeringen and OV Bank; and the opinion
of Advocate General Trstenjak in CJEU case C-37/08 RCI Europe, in particular point 73.
23
24
See for example CJEU cases C-166/05 Heger Rudi, paragraphs 23 and 24 and C-37/08 RCI Europe,
paragraph 36.
24/53
The question whether the services provided offsite/at a distance can be seen as
connected with immovable property depends on the specific nature of the service
in question. The fact that the service is provided (fully or partially) at a distance is
not on its own an obstacle for the service to have a sufficiently direct connection
with immovable property. Each case must be judged objectively taking into
account the factual circumstances at stake.
2.2.5. Does the quality of the recipient of the services affect the qualification of the
services?
114.
The quality of the recipient of the service (i.e. whether he is the owner of the
immovable property or not) is irrelevant for determining the qualification of the
service itself: all depends on the nature and the objective features of the service
concerned. For example, it is obvious that a service of repair of a dwelling or
construction work is connected with the immovable property, whether it is
supplied to the owner, the tenant or any occupant of the dwelling or to another
supplier in a chain of transactions (e.g. in case of subcontracting).
115.
2.2.6. Does the location of the recipient of the services affect the qualification of the
services?
116.
This question has to be approached in the same way as the one above. Decisive is
the nature of the service and not the location of the recipient of the supply. The
VAT treatment of the service cannot depend on whether the property is located
inside or outside the country where the property owner is established. Each service
needs to be judged taking into account the factual circumstances at stake.
25
Article 31a(1)(a) states that services connected with immovable property have to
be derived from this specific property making up a constituent element and being
central and essential for the service to be supplied. It is not possible to perform
such a service without the exact underlying property which further implies that the
service has to be carried out in relation to a specific immovable property. The
See CJEU case C-155/12 RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland, paragraphs 34 and 35.
25/53
119.
120.
Point (b) of Article 31a(1) refers to physical alteration without any further
specification. Thus it seems correct to assume that any kind of physical
modification of an immovable property should be sufficient to be covered by this
provision. It is worth to note that the phrase physical alteration used in
Article 31a(1)(b) should not be seen as limited only to changes that are significant.
In other words minor changes resulting in a physical alteration of an immovable
property should also be covered by Article 31a(1)(b) (e.g. maintenance or cleaning
of roads, tunnels, bridges, etc.).
2.3.
The list under Article 31a(2) is purely indicative and provides, as indicated by its
wording (in particular), examples of specific services which the EU legislator has
considered as being connected with immovable property in the sense of Article 47
of the VAT Directive. By doing so, it provides legal certainty in many common
scenarios.
122.
Article 31a(2) does not restrict the general definition of the concept of services
connected with immovable property provided under Article 31a(1). Any specific
situation that has not been explicitly covered by Article 31a(2)(a) to (q) should
therefore be assessed on a case-by-case basis against the criteria set under
Article 31a(1).
123.
Following the same logic, the EU legislator has also provided under Article 31a(3)
an indicative list of services that are not to be considered as being connected with
immovable property (see points 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 above).
26
124.
The preparatory phase of construction works can cover multiple steps (e.g.
developing conceptual designs, conducting geostationary studies, etc.) which are
more or less closely connected to immovable property. Some services of this
preparatory phase can be supplied while the specific location of the immovable
property is not yet known or certain.
125.
In such circumstances, when services are provided without being directed towards
a plot of land or particular property, these services cannot be regarded as
sufficiently connected with immovable property and fall outside the scope of
Article 47 of the VAT Directive. Such services should be taxed according to the
relevant B2B or B2C general place-of-supply rules depending on whether they are
provided to a business customer or to a final consumer. Only services provided
with respect to specific location can fall within the scope of Article 47.
126.
In the event where services such as the drawing-up of plans or the conduct of a
study are not followed-up by construction works and no building is erected, these
services can nevertheless qualify as connected with immovable property provided
that they were supplied with respect to a clearly identified location. This could also
be the case in the event where the supplier of the services participates in a bidding
process but does not succeed in winning the contract.
127.
Article 31a(2)(b) provides that on-site supervision and security services shall be
regarded as services connected with immovable property.
128.
When initially discussed in the VAT Committee in 201127, on-site supervision was
pointed out as an example of services provided in the framework of the preparation
and coordination of construction works. It is in fact one of the services expressly
listed in Article 47 of the VAT Directive as a service connected with immovable
property.
27
The VAT Implementing Regulation applies the same tax treatment to the provision
of on-site supervision and to security.
130.
131.
Security services have a different scope. On one hand, they can be provided during
the preparatory or construction phase of works to prevent theft or damage of
equipment and material stored at a building site. This would generally require onsite presence of security guards who would control the access to the site of staff
and delivery suppliers, ensure overnight security, monitor the site through video
surveillance (CCTV monitoring), etc. On the other hand, security services can also
be provided after the end of the construction or renovation works to ensure the
security of residential, commercial, industrial or office buildings. These services
can be provided through the physical presence of security officers, by installing
security systems into the building or both.
132.
2.3.3.2.
133.
134.
28/53
Does the installation of a security system enter the scope of Article 31a(2)(b)?
135.
136.
If the installation of the security system is part of the sale arrangement of a security
system, the transaction may receive different qualifications for VAT purposes. It
can be a supply of goods which, according to Article 36 of the VAT Directive, will
be taxed where the security system is installed or assembled. It can also be a
supply of service connected with immovable property when the conditions set
under Article 31a(2)(m) are met.
137.
138.
In the case of installation works leading to the security system becoming part of
the immovable property, the service is considered as connected with immovable
property. This would ensure taxation at the same location, regardless of whether
the supply is qualified as a supply of goods with installation or assembly or as a
supply of services connected with immovable property.
The scope of this provision covers all types of construction works including not
only the construction of new buildings but also other construction works such as
the reconstruction, alteration, conversion, enlargement, demolition (total or partial)
of existing buildings or parts of buildings (this list is not exhaustive and in practice
some services can cover two or more of these examples).
29/53
Which should be the VAT treatment of the hiring of staff for the purpose of
construction works?
140.
It is arguable whether the hiring of staff for carrying out construction works is a
service provided to, or directed towards, an immovable property, having as [...]
object the legal or physical alteration of that property.
141.
On the one hand, it could be considered that the assignment of staff, regardless of
whether or not this is hired for construction work, is a provision of services subject
to the general place-of-supply rules and should not be seen as connected with
immovable property.
142.
On the other hand, replying to a similar question, Article 31b provides that the
hiring of equipment with a view of carrying out work on immovable property must
be treated as a supply of services connected with immovable property, insofar as
the supplier hiring out the equipment assumes responsibility for the execution of
the work. It could therefore be argued that, similarly to the provision of equipment,
the hiring of staff can constitute a service connected with immovable property if
the supplier assumes responsibility for the execution of the work.
143.
To ensure a coherent VAT treatment for hiring of equipment and for hiring of
staff, the same logic has to be followed in both scenarios: the service shall only be
considered as connected with immovable property if the supplier of the hiring out
of staff assumes responsibility for the execution of the work. In such scenarios, the
supplier would in actual fact not just supply staff to his customer but also take
responsibility for the performance and results of the construction works which
equals to providing construction services, i.e. providing a service connected with
immovable property.
144.
Yes, under this provision the term land should be understood as any piece of land
above or below sea level, consistent with the definition given under Article 13b(b).
145.
That can be inferred from the case law of the CJEU28 according to which the
installation of a cable on the seabed must be subject to the same tax treatment as an
installation on immovable property.
28
What are the limits to the construction and demolition works covered by
Article 31a(2)(d)?
146.
147.
Once the permanent structure is constructed and the construction works are over,
the use of this structure for services such as the transport of gas, water, sewage,
electricity, etc. shall not be considered as connected with the immovable property.
148.
149.
150.
151.
Since agricultural services can cover a very large range of activities, a strict
definition should be applied for VAT purposes under the VAT Implementing
Regulation. Agricultural services should be considered as connected to immovable
property only insofar as they concern work on land. For example, rearing of
livestock is an agricultural activity that is not to be considered as connected with
immovable property.
Article 47 of the VAT Directive defines the place of supply of services connected
with immovable property and makes explicit reference to the services of experts.
Like valuation services, surveying and assessment of the risk and integrity of
immovable property constitute such expert services and must be taxed accordingly
at the place where the immovable property is located, provided that there is a
31/53
Risk and integrity assessment services are for example provided by experts to
insurance companies to help determine the conditions of an insurance contract for
a building. They can also be provided as part of feasibility studies carried out in
view of construction works. Such services imply technical assessment of the
physical state and/or integrity of a specific immovable property, its structural
elements, equipment, etc. In some cases, they can require site visits of the
property. Such on-site presence of the experts is however not a condition per se for
the service to be covered by Article 31a(2)(f). Other examples of risk and integrity
assessment services are anti-seismic evaluations, surveying of the sea-bed,
assessment conducted on a plot of land in order to determine whether it is suitable
for construction, assessment of energy efficiency, assessment of safety related
documentation and compliance with other environment, health or safety related
obligations.
154.
While surveying and assessment of risk and integrity can sometimes be provided
together with valuation services, they can also be provided separately. The EU
legislator has therefore chosen to cover them individually in two complementary
provisions of the VAT Implementing Regulation (see Article 31a(2)(g) hereafter).
This aims at clarifying that not only valuation but also other expert services
serving similar purposes are covered by the particular place-of-supply rule of
Article 47 of the VAT Directive.
Which valuation
Article 31a(2)(g)?
services
of
immovable
property
are
covered
by
155.
156.
The scope of Article 31a(2)(g) therefore covers all valuation services regardless of
the purposes of the valuation. The examples given under Article 31a(2)(g)
(valuation services for insurance purposes, valuation services to determine the
value of a property as collateral for a loan or valuation services to assess risk and
damages in disputes) serve only as illustrations and do not constitute an exhaustive
list as indicated by the use of the word including under this provision. Scenarios
where the valuation service constitutes part of a bundled supply must be examined
on a case-by-case basis according to the established case law29 of the CJEU (see
point 1.6 above).
29
See CJEU cases C-425/06 Part Service and C-392/11 Field Fisher Waterhouse.
32/53
157.
Due diligence services are expert services consisting in the investigation and
analysis of a companys or organisations situation prior to a business transaction.
They typically aim to ascertain a list of material facts (related to immovable
property or not) in order to identify potential risks and allow a better valuation of
the business assets.
158.
In some circumstances, due diligence services can look into immovable property
owned by a customer. As expert services, they can only qualify as connected with
immovable property if they have a sufficiently direct connection with that
property. This would be the case insofar as the service focuses on one or several
specific immovable properties, regardless of the methods (on-site or remote
desktop inspection) used to provide the service.
159.
Similarly to legal services (see also comments under point 2.3.18. below), due
diligence services can be regarded as connected with immovable property even in
the event where they are not followed by an actual sale or letting of the property,
or where the property is finally not subject to a physical alteration.
2.3.8.3.
160.
Does the method by which a property valuation is carried out have a bearing
on whether the provision of that service is treated as connected with
immovable property or not?
of
immovable
property
(Article 31a(2)(h)
and
Article 31a(2)(h)
the leasing or letting of immovable property other than that
covered by point (c) of paragraph 3, including the storage of goods for which a specific
part of the property is assigned for the exclusive use of the customer;
Article 31a(3)(b)
the storage of goods in an immovable property if no specific part of
the immovable property is assigned for the exclusive use of the customer;
2.3.9.1.
161.
30
The VAT Directive does not provide for definitions of leasing or letting of
immovable property. However, as already underlined in section 2 of the
Explanatory notes (see point 1.12.) a common application of the rules is only
possible if national law concepts30 are disregarded for VAT purposes, which is
essential to avoid double or non-taxation.
See opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak in CJEU case C-37/08 RCI Europe, in particular point 50.
33/53
2.3.9.2.
163.
164.
For the particular example of storage of goods, the legislator has fixed the
requirement that a specific part of the immovable property where the goods are
stored must be assigned for the exclusive use of the customer. In the RR Donnelley
case, the CJEU has further indicated that If, () it were to transpire that the
recipients of such storage service have, for example, no right of access to the part
of the property where their goods are stored or that the immovable property on
which or in which those goods are to be stored does not constitute a central and
essential element of the supply of services, the supply of a complex storage
services could fall outside the scope of Article 47 of the VAT Directive.
165.
These two elements - the access to the stored goods and the central and essential
character of the immovable property for the service supplied - are factors meant to
help the national courts in their assessment but do not constitute new, additional
conditions to the one foreseen under Article 31a(2)(h). Therefore, the situation
where a customer has an exclusively assigned area for the storage of goods (i.e. an
area where only that customer can store goods to the exception of any other
person), could qualify as a service connected with immovable property even if the
customer can access that area only at certain moments or under certain conditions.
2.3.9.3.
166.
167.
The following test should therefore be run in order to establish the place of supply
of a complex storage service:
- Is storage of goods provided together with other services which are so closely
linked to the storage that they form, objectively, a single, indivisible service,
31
See for example CJEU cases C-174/06 CO.GE.P., paragraph 31 and C-270/09 MacDonald Resorts,
paragraph 46.
32
See CJEU case C-155/12 RR Donelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland, paragraphs 20 to 25.
34/53
If the answer to one of these two questions is affirmative, the complex supply shall
be treated as one single supply. Provided that a specific part of the storage facility
is assigned for the exclusive use of the customer, the indivisible services (in the
first case) and, in the second case, all the components of the complex supply (both
the storage and the ancillary/closely linked services to it) shall be subject to VAT
at the place where the storage facility is located.
The conversion of timeshare usage rights (also called exchange of timeshare usage
rights) relates to services enabling customers to exercise, against consideration, a
right to temporarily use a property, stay in a hotel or occupy an accommodation.
170.
The suppliers providing these services would typically sell contractual rights (e.g.
trough enrolment and/or subscription fees) to their customers who would then
receive points (or Points Rights). In exchange of these points, the contract allows
these customers to stay, for example, in holiday resorts or obtain other services.
The exchange of the points by the customer against a concrete service is called
conversion of timeshare usage rights. Where the conversion of timeshare usage
rights provides the customer a right to stay in a specific place, this conversion is to
be seen as a service connected with immovable property.
171.
35/53
2.3.10.3. Are additional services commonly provided in the hotel sector, such as the
organisation of events, also covered by Article 31a(2)(i)?
173.
Article 31a(2)(i) does not cover all services commonly provided by hotels. On the
contrary, this provision explicitly targets accommodation services.
174.
Services like the organisation of events are generally covered by Articles 53 and
54 of the VAT Directive.
175.
While the immovable property is the central, essential and constituent element of
any accommodation service, the importance of the immovable good may not be as
central for other services such as the organisation of weddings or wine tastings.
These are services that some hotels may typically provide on top of their core
business activity which is to offer accommodation.
176.
In some scenarios, the hotel may only let a room to a customer for the organisation
of an event. This service would qualify as letting of immovable property and
would therefore be considered as connected with immovable property under
Article 31a(2)(h). In other situations, the hotel may be the organiser of the event
providing, for example, not only a room but also equipment, advertising, restaurant
or catering services. In this last scenario, the service consisting in the organisation
of the event will not fall under the scope of Article 31a(2)(i) and will not be
considered as connected with immovable property.
The purpose of this provision is to complement the scope of the services covered
by Article 31a(2)(h) and Article 31a(2)(i) in order to ensure consistent tax
treatment of the different types of use of immovable property. These three
36/53
Taking this into account and reading Article 31a(2)(j) together with
Article 31a(2)(h) and Article 31a(2)(i), it appears that the scope of Article 31a(2)(j)
is larger than that of the two previous provisions because it aims at embracing
services other than those covered by points (h) and (i). It should therefore be
applied not only to the examples which are listed in the provision itself (fishing
and hunting rights, access to lounges in airports, use of bridges or tunnels subject
to tolls) but also to any other similar assignments or transfers of rights to use whole
or parts of an immovable property which is not explicitly listed in the mentioned
provisions and which meets the conditions of a service sufficiently connected with
immovable property.
179.
The scope of this provision is broad but remains strictly limited by the condition of
the existence of a sufficiently direct connection between the service and the
immovable property. While examples such as berth services provided in port or
airport premises, port and airport duties corresponding to the right to use the
immovable property, rental of mooring places, etc. fall within the scope of
Article 47 of the VAT Directive, additional services offered separately by the same
suppliers (cleaning or laundry services proposed to the customers on top of berth
services; telecommunications, restaurant and catering services provided in VIP
lounges of airports; maintenance of boats moored in rented mooring places, etc.)
do not fall within the scope of Article 47 only because they are provided in ports or
airports for example.
The place of supply of such services shall depend on their qualification into a
single or multiple services for VAT purposes based on the criteria defined by the
case law of the CJEU33. For each single supply, it should be examined whether the
use of the whole or parts of the immovable property (office space) constitutes the
central and essential element of the contract. Whenever this is the case,
Article 31a(2)(j) shall apply and VAT shall be due in the Member State where the
offices are located (see also point 1.6. above).
The wording of Article 31a(2)(k) clearly refers only to buildings and parts of
buildings which limits the scope of this provision to some immovable properties.
184.
The maintenance, renovation and repair of other types of immovable property can
however also have a sufficiently direct connection with immovable property if they
fall within the scope of other provisions of the VAT Implementing Regulation,
notably Article 31a(2)(l), or more generally within Article 31a(1)(b).
2.3.12.2. Does Article 31a(2)(k) only cover maintenance, renovation and repair linked
to major works or does it also apply to recurrent cleaning services, inside and
outside buildings?
185.
The scope of this provision covers a large range of services. It applies to major
renovation works as well as to more limited repairs or maintenance services. It
covers the interior and exterior cleaning of a building and therefore encompasses
services of office cleaning.
and
repair
of
permanent
structures
Article 31a(2)(l)
the maintenance, renovation and repair of
structures such as pipeline systems for gas, water, sewerage and the like;
permanent
33
See CJEU case C-155/12 RR Donelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland, paragraphs 20 to 25.
38/53
The CJEU has ruled34 that in some circumstances houseboats can qualify as
immovable property (see also explanations under Article 13b(b)). It is notably so
when the houseboat is fixed by attachments which are not easily removable to the
bank and bed of the river, stays in a demarcated location in the river water and is
exclusively used for the permanent operation of a fixed activity at that location,
such as the running of a restaurant-discotheque for example.
189.
190.
Articles 13b(c) and (d) provide respectively that any item that has been installed
and makes up an integral part of a building or construction without which the
building or construction is incomplete and any item, equipment or machine
permanently installed in a building or construction which cannot be moved without
destroying or altering the building or construction shall be regarded as
immovable property. Both provisions thus make reference to installed movable
goods that become immovable property upon installation or assembly.
192.
The purpose of Article 31a(2)(m) is therefore to recall and explicitly clarify that
the installation and assembly of movable goods which, once installed or
assembled, qualify as immovable property, are to be considered as services
34
Article 31a(2)(m) covers the process of installation from the start. All installation
and assembly services carried out at the place where the item, equipment or
machine will ultimately be installed or assembled fall under Article 31a(2)(m).
Assembly services carried out at a different location prior to the delivery of the
goods to this place would, for example, not fall under the scope of this provision.
Also, the transport or delivery of these goods or of the tools or machines needed
for the installation or assembly would not be covered by this provision.
195.
196.
For bundled supplies (e.g. where transport services are included), an individual
assessment should be performed as to the overall nature of the service (see point
1.6 of this document).
The purpose of this provision is identical to the one of Article 31a(2)(m) (see
above). Once machines or equipment have been installed or assembled and qualify,
upon their installation or assembly as immovable property, maintenance, repair,
inspection and supervision services provided with respect to these machines or
equipment are to be considered as connected with immovable property.
40/53
200.
201.
While the scope of Article 31a(2)(o) is limited by the wording of the provision
which makes reference only to property management by or on behalf of the owner
of the property, it does not prevent services operated on behalf of the tenant or the
lessee to be considered connected with immovable property under some other
specific provisions or under the general provisions of the Implementing
Regulation.
202.
Also, while property management has been defined by the EU legislator as having
a sufficiently direct connection with immovable property, this is not the case for
portfolio management of investments in real estate even when that portfolio
contains immovable property.
204.
For the purposes of the VAT Implementing Regulation, the main difference
between property and portfolio management lies within the use made of the
immovable property at stake. Immovable property can be an investment asset just
as investments in gold, securities, collectors items, works of art, antiques, boats,
etc. Whenever immovable property is bought or sold for investment purposes,
management services linked to that operation are to be treated as portfolio
management and therefore not being connected to immovable property.
206.
207.
Also, the number of properties covered by the service is irrelevant for the
qualification of a service as property or portfolio management. Since the nature of
the service remains the same irrespective of the number of properties at stake, it is
possible that in some situations portfolio management of investment in real estate
could relate to one single property.
208.
2.3.17. Intermediation
in
transactions
involving
(Article 31a(2)(p) and Article 31a(3)(d))
immovable
property
Article 31a(2)(p)
intermediation in the sale, leasing or letting of immovable
property and in the establishment or transfer of certain interests in immovable property or
rights in rem over immovable property (whether or not treated as tangible property), other
than intermediation covered by point (d) of paragraph 3;
Article 31a(3)(d)
intermediation in the provision of hotel accommodation or
accommodation in sectors with a similar function, such as holiday camps or sites
developed for use as camping sites, if the intermediary is acting in the name and on behalf
of another person;
2.3.17.1. Which intermediation activities qualify as connected with immovable
property? What is the scope of Article 31a(2)(p)?
209.
Having in mind that national civil law concepts differ substantially in relation to
intermediation and the underlying transactions, these concepts should not be the
first point of reference when assessing whether a service is covered by
Article 31a(2)(p).
2.3.17.2. Is Article 31a(2)(p) limited only to intermediation by real estate agents or does
it also apply to any person involved in intermediation services?
211.
Article 47 of the VAT Directive explicitly includes in its scope services of experts
and estate agents. However intermediation covered by Article 31a(2)(p) is not
limited to services performed by these two professions. Persons or legal entities
who are not experts or estate agents could also perform business activities
mentioned in this provision.
212.
This is confirmed by the literal wording of Article 47 of the VAT Directive, the
scope of which is not limited to specific trades or professions. Therefore, other
professions like for example an asset manager or a real estate broker should not
be excluded from the scope of Article 31a(2)(p) only because they are not
explicitly mentioned under Article 47 of the VAT Directive. What is decisive for
the application of Article 31a(2)(p) is the type of services actually performed by
the intermediary and not his profession.
2.3.17.3. Does point (p) of Article 31a(2) also cover supplies where the sale, leasing,
letting, establishment of transfer of certain interests in immovable property or
right in rem over immovable property does not take place?
213.
Article 31a(2)(p) should also cover intermediation services where the sale, leasing,
letting, establishment of transfer of certain interests in immovable property or right
in rem over immovable property does not finally take place.
2.3.17.4. Why does Article 31a(3)(d) underline the condition if the intermediary is
acting in the name and on behalf of another person?
214.
Article 31a(3)(d) excludes from the scope of services connected with immovable
property intermediation in the provision of hotel accommodation or
accommodation in sectors with a similar function, such as holiday camps or sites
developed for use as camping sites, if the intermediary is acting in the name and on
behalf of another person.
215.
The purpose of including in the provision the condition that the intermediary has to
act in the name and on behalf of another person was to align its scope with that of
Article 31. The latter provision envisages that for intermediation in the provision
of accommodation in the hotel and similar sectors, where an intermediary acts in
the name and on behalf of another person, Article 44 (for B2B supplies) or
Article 46 (for B2C supplies) of the VAT Directive applies. In other words, for the
services mentioned in Article 31, Article 47 of the VAT Directive does not apply.
43/53
It should be underlined that when a taxable person is acting in his own name he is
not treated as an intermediary but as a supplier in accordance with Article 28 of the
VAT Directive. Therefore such a supply is not covered by Article 31a(3)(d).
It is possible that other services are included in the whole supply provided by a
business performing intermediation services. In the case of complex supplies each
case has to be assessed on its own merits. In accordance with the settled case law
of the CJEU where a transaction consists of several elements that are treated as one
single supply a principal supply has to identified. Only when the main element is
identified as intermediation in the sale, leasing or letting of immovable property, or
in the establishment or transfer of certain interests in immovable property or rights
in rem over immovable property the whole service can be covered by
Article 31a(2)(p). Then the single intermediary supply is considered as connected
with immovable property within the meaning of Article 47 of the VAT Directive
applies (see also point 1.6 of this document).
Legal services may relate to many various transactions. It is only in very few
situations that legal services could be seen as having sufficiently direct connection
to immovable property. In order to be covered by Article 47 of the VAT Directive
legal services, as indicated under Article 31a(2)(q), need to relate to the transfer of
a title to immovable property, to the establishment or transfer of certain interests in
immovable property or rights in rem over immovable property.
219.
As a result, Article 31a(3)(h), which states which legal services are not covered by
Article 47 of the VAT Directive, applies to all these legal services other than those
covered by Article 31a(2)(q). In drawing a border line between these two
provisions focus should be on the criteria included in Article 31a(2)(q).
220.
222.
Two examples of legal services covered by Article 31a(2)(q) are given in this
provision: notary work and the drawing up of a contract to sell or acquire
immovable property. However, it should be kept in mind that legal services
relating to the transfer of a title of immovable property can take other forms like
for example legal services relating to property investments in fixed capital,
liquidation (receiving liquidation quota as property), drawing up construction
contracts, leasing contracts or the partition of immovable property in case of a
divorce.
223.
The range of legal services which could have a link with immovable property is
very wide. However, only legal services relating to one of the three points listed
under Article 31a(2)(q) should be seen as connected with immovable property.
This means that the legal services covered by Article 31a(2)(q) are only those that
relate to the actual legal alteration of the property. Consequently, legal services
connected with the transfer of a title that happened at some point in the past (i.e.
the service does not relate to a current or prospective transaction) cannot be treated
as connected with immovable property. Such an approach is confirmed by
reference in the last part of this provision to the legal transaction altering the legal
status of the property (even if finally not carried through).
224.
35
Article 31a(2)(q) refers to legal services but it does not list the professions by
which these services should be performed. Therefore professions other than
lawyers or notaries cannot be excluded from the application of this provision.
Decisive is that the person providing the legal services is a taxable person and that
these services relate directly to the transfer of a title of immovable property, the
establishment or transfer of certain interests in immovable property or rights in
rem over immovable property (whether or not treated as tangible property).
228.
Article 31a(2)(q) cannot be read without linking it with Article 15(2) of the VAT
Directive. The latter provision leaves the option for Member States to extend the
concept of tangible property to, among others, certain interests in immovable
property and to rights in rem giving the holder thereof a right of use over
immovable property. If the option is used by a given Member State, these interests
or rights in rem are to be treated as the property to which they relate.
229.
230.
Interests equivalent to shares giving the holder thereof de jure or de facto rights of
ownership or possession over immovable property or part thereof as mentioned in
Article 15(2)(c) of the VAT Directive are not covered by the notion certain
interests included in Article 31a(2)(q).
2.3.18.5. Do advisory services that require on-site presence or that are linked to a
specific immovable property qualify as connected with immovable property
under Article 31a(2)(q)?
231.
As mentioned above, under point 2.3.18.1, advisory services, as a rule, should not
be seen as covered by Article 31a(2)(q).The requirement of on-site presence for a
legal service to be performed is irrelevant for the application of Article 31a(2)(q).
46/53
Where legal services consist in drafting a rental agreement and the conclusion of
such an agreement would establish or transfer certain interest in immovable
property or rights in rem over immovable property, those services should be seen
as covered by Article 31a(2)(q) and therefore connected with immovable property.
Advertising services can be provided through very different means and on different
physical supports. Immovable property can be one of the possible supports for this
type of service. When this is the case, the question arises whether the use of an
immovable property (such as walls or billboards) as a physical support for the
service is sufficient to qualify this service as connected with immovable property.
235.
This question was discussed in the VAT Committee prior to the adoption of the
VAT Implementing Regulation and it was agreed that advertising services shall not
be considered as services connected with immovable property even when they
involve the use of immovable property.
236.
This can be explained by the fact that, in the scenario described above, the
immovable property (wall or billboard) is only a support for the service and not the
subject-matter of the service. The subject-matter of the service is the promotion of
a product. Therefore, there is no sufficiently direct connection between the
advertising service and the immovable property for Article 47 of the VAT
Directive to be applied, no matter what product is being advertised (e.g. even in the
event of advertising a house or flat for sale).
237.
The provision of advertising services should of course not be confused with the
rental or letting service whereby a property owner would rent an immovable
property to an advertising company that would in turn use this property as a space
for advertising. This example illustrates two separate contractual relations. First,
there is a service of renting or letting of the immovable property which will qualify
as a service connected with immovable property. Second, there is a subsequent
advertising service supplied by the advertising company to its own customer which
does not qualify as a service connected with immovable property.
47/53
The wording of Article 31a(3)(c) does not distinguish between the different forms
and techniques of advertising. Since the key question is to determine if the
immovable property is the subject-matter of the service or not, and the answer to
this question is the same irrespective of the technique used for advertising, it
should be considered that Article 31a(3)(c) shall apply even when the service
implies painting part of a building.
239.
Article 31a(3)(e) covers the situations where the provision of a stand location at a
fair or exhibition site is accompanied by other related services and defines them as
not connected with immovable property.
241.
242.
This provision should apply not only to stands located at fairs or exhibitions but
also to stands temporarily located in other venues as for example airports,
shopping centres, weekly markets, etc. provided that the other conditions of
Article 31a(3)(e) are satisfied. The context and physical environment of the
location of the stand is therefore not a decisive element for this provision to apply.
There are three important cumulative criteria that have to be met for the service to
be considered as not connected with immovable property:
i)
48/53
iii)
these related services must enable the exhibitor to display items and
promote its services or products.
244.
245.
246.
In accordance with Article 31a(3)(e), other related services provided together with
a stand location should enable the exhibitor to display items. The services
mentioned cover the design of the stand, transport and storage of the items, the
provision of machines, cable laying, insurance and advertising. This list is not
exhaustive but purely illustrative. Other types of services could also be covered by
the reference made in Article 31a(3)(e) to related services provided that they
enable the exhibitor to display items.
247.
49/53
Article 31b provides that the hiring of equipment to a customer, with or without
accompanying staff, with a view to carrying out work on an immovable property
shall only be regarded as a service connected with immovable property if the
supplier assumes responsibility for the execution of the work. Where the
equipment is put at the disposal of the customer together with sufficient staff for its
operation, the presumption is that the supplier of the equipment has assumed such
responsibility. In this case, the service must be taxed in the country where that
immovable property is located.
249.
A typical example of scenario in which this provision could apply is the use of
scaffoldings for the construction, repairing or cleaning of a building. If the
scaffolding is simply put at the disposal or rented to a customer, this rental service
will not qualify as a service connected with immovable property. However, if the
supplier of the scaffolding assumes responsibility for the execution of the work
(e.g. construction, repairing or cleaning of the building), notably because he has
also provided sufficient staff to take care of this execution, the service will qualify
as a service connected with immovable property.
250.
In any case, the presumption of responsibility on the part of the supplier of the
equipment included under Article 31b can be rebutted by any relevant means in
fact or law. The contractual arrangements would generally provide important
indications on the person with whom the contractual responsibility lies.
50/53
ANNEX
EXTRACTS FROM RELEVANT LEGISLATION
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2006/112/EC (Provision already applicable)
Article 47 - Supply of services connected with immovable property
The place of supply of services connected with immovable property, including the services
of experts and estate agents, the provision of accommodation in the hotel sector or in
sectors with a similar function, such as holiday camps or sites developed for use as
camping sites, the granting of rights to use immovable property and services for the
preparation and coordination of construction work, such as the services of architects and
of firms providing on-site supervision, shall be the place where the immovable property is
located.
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) NO 1042/13 (Provisions taking
effect on 1 January 2017)
Amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards the place of supply
of services
Article 13b
For the application of Directive 2006/112/EC, the following shall be regarded as
immovable property:
(a)
any specific part of the earth, on or below its surface, over which title and
possession can be created;
(b)
any building or construction fixed to or in the ground above or below sea level
which cannot be easily dismantled or moved;
(c)
any item that has been installed and makes up an integral part of a building or
construction without which the building or construction is incomplete, such as
doors, windows, roofs, staircases and lifts;
(d)
Article 31a
1. Services connected with immovable property, as referred to in Article 47 of Directive
2006/112/EC, shall include only those services that have a sufficiently direct connection
with that property. Services shall be regarded as having a sufficiently direct connection
with immovable property in the following cases:
(a)
where they are derived from an immovable property and that property makes up a
constituent element of the service and is central to, and essential for, the services
supplied;
(b)
where they are provided to, or directed towards, an immovable property, having as
their object the legal or physical alteration of that property.
51/53
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
work on land, including agricultural services such as tillage, sowing, watering and
fertilisation;
(f)
(g)
the valuation of immovable property, including where such service is needed for
insurance purposes, to determine the value of a property as collateral for a loan or
to assess risk and damages in disputes;
(h)
the leasing or letting of immovable property other than that covered by point (c) of
paragraph 3, including the storage of goods for which a specific part of the property
is assigned for the exclusive use of the customer;
(i)
(j)
the assignment or transfer of rights other than those covered by points (h) and (i) to
use the whole or parts of an immovable property, including the licence to use part of
a property, such as the granting of fishing and hunting rights or access to lounges in
airports, or the use of an infrastructure for which tolls are charged, such as a bridge
or tunnel;
(k)
(l)
(o)
(p)
52/53
the drawing up of plans for a building or parts of a building if not designated for a
particular plot of land;
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
the provision of a stand location at a fair or exhibition site together with other
related services to enable the exhibitor to display items, such as the design of the
stand, transport and storage of the items, the provision of machines, cable laying,
insurance and advertising;
(f)
the installation or assembly, the maintenance and repair, the inspection or the
supervision of machines or equipment which is not, or does not become, part of the
immovable property;
(g)
(h)
legal services other than those covered by point (q) of paragraph 2, connected to
contracts, including advice given on the terms of a contract to transfer immovable
property, or to enforce such a contract, or to prove the existence of such a contract,
where such services are not specific to a transfer of a title on an immovable
property.
Article 31b
Where equipment is put at the disposal of a customer with a view to carrying out work on
immovable property, that transaction shall only be a supply of services connected with
immovable property if the supplier assumes responsibility for the execution of the work.
A supplier who provides the customer with equipment together with sufficient staff for its
operation with a view to carrying out work shall be presumed to have assumed
responsibility for the execution of that work. The presumption that the supplier has the
responsibility for the execution of the work may be rebutted by any relevant means in fact
or law.
53/53