Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Greenline Capital Partners I LLC v. Duerson Foods LLC et al Doc.

3
Case 2:06-cv-00403-TJC Filed 04/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 Document 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
GREENLINE CAPITAL PARTNERS I,
LLC, a limited liability company,

Plaintiff, Case No. 06-C-403

v.

DUERSON FOODS, LLC, a limited


liability company, ASSOCIATED BANK
CHICAGO, an Illinois state banking
Association, SMURFIT-STONE
CONTAINER ENTERPRISES, INC.
a/k/a SMURFIT STONE CONTAINER
CORPORATION, a corporation, and
GENERAL PARTS, INC., a corporation,

Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Greenline Capital Partners I, LLC, has filed an Ancillary

Complaint seeking judicial foreclosure, replevin, appointment of a receiver, and

injunctive relief. This action arises out of a collection action which was venued in the

United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See Ancillary

Complaint at Exhibit A. In that case, the Plaintiff claimed diversity jurisdiction. See 28

U.S.C. § 1332. However, neither the California Complaint nor the Ancillary Complaint

filed in this court contains the names and states of citizenship of each member of the

limited liability companies which are parties. The record must contain this information

so that the court can determine whether recusal is necessary and whether it has

subject matter jurisdiction. Both the Ninth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit have ruled

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00403-TJC Filed 04/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 Document 3

that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company is a citizen of every

state of which its owners or members are citizens. See Johnson v. Columbia

Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006); Cosgrove v. Bartolllata,

150 F.3d 729, 731(7th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, in order to provide the court with a basis for determining

subject matter jurisdiction, the court ORDERS that, within eleven days of the date of

this Order, the Plaintiff shall serve and file an Amended Ancillary Complaint setting forth

the names and citizenship of all limited liability company owners or members. At the

same time, the Plaintiff shall also file a copy of the complete docket of the California

action.

Done and Ordered in Chambers at the United States Courthouse,

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 6th day of April, 2006.

s/ Thomas J. Curran
Thomas J. Curran
United States District Judge

You might also like