Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WITH
PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
SLP (CC) No. 16913 OF 2014

IN THE MATTER OF:


Ran Singh & Anr.

.Petitioner
Versus

Union of India & Anr.

Respondent

LIST OF DATES & EVENTS

21.03.2003

The Land Acquisition Collector issued notification under


Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter the
1894

Act)

vide

notification

No.

F11(19)/2001/L&B/L.A./20112 dated 21.03.2003.

19.03.2004

A declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act was issued


vide

Notification

No.F10(7)/2004/L&B/LA/28210

dated

19.03.2004.

27.01.2006

The

Land

Acquisition

Collector

vide

Award

No.

3/DCW/2005-06 under Section 11 of the 1894 Act fixed the


market value of land at Rs 15,70,000 per acre in Village
Mundka, Delhi 41.
Award dated 27.01.2006 at Annexure P-1, Pages 4752,
SLP Paperbook
Summary of award at Page 52, SLP Paperbook

12.12.2012 &
14.12.2012

The Petitioners herein filed a petition under Section 18 of the


1894 Act for enhancing amount of compensation before the
Learned Reference Court. The Learned Additional District
Judge relying upon the case of Jamna v Union of India vide

2
LA Appeal No.784/2005 enhanced the compensation from
Rs. 15,70,000/- per acre to Rs. 19,36,440/-per acre.
Order for Ran Singh dated 12.12.2012 at Annexure P2,
Pages 53-61, SLP Paperbook
Finding and Conclusion of Order at Page 59, SLP
Paperbook
Relief at Page 60, SLP Paperbook

Order for Hari Ram dated 14.12.2012 at Annexure P-3,


Pages 62-70, SLP Paperbook
Finding and Conclusion at Page 68, SLP Paperbook
Relief at Page 69, SLP Paperbook

21.05.2014

The

petitioners

filed

appeal

for

enhancement

of

compensation under Section 54 of the 1894 Act before the


Honble High Court of Delhi numbered as LA Appeal No.
270/2014 titled Ran Singh v Union of India and LA Appeal
No. 271/2014 titled as Hari Ram v Union of India.

The Honble High Court vide the impugned judgment and


final Order was pleased to dismiss the appeals being LA
Appeal No. 270/2014 and 271/2014 preferred by the
Petitioners herein on the basis of the judgment of Jamna v
Union of India dated 08.07.2011 in LA Appeal No. 784/2005
and the Honble High Court was also pleased to dismiss the
appeals

on

the

ground

that

enhancement

in

the

compensation had already been granted by the Learned


Additional District Judge.
Judgment of Honble High Court at Pages 1-4, SLP
Paperbook
Finding and Conclusion at Page 4, SLP Paperbook

04.09.2014

Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and final Order


of the Honble High Court, the Petitioners herein preferred
the instant Special Leave Petition.

3
Special Leave Petition at Pages 36-44

You might also like