Usada Brown
Usada Brown
6/23/2016 5:22:59 PM
Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 11312552
By: Nelson Cuero
Filed: 6/23/2016 5:22:59 PM
Petitioner.
ist
ric
tC
ler
k
IN RE: USADA,
nie
lD
Da
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202, Petitioner United States Anti-Doping
is
Agency (USADA) requests to take the oral and video-taped deposition of Jeffrey Stuart Brown,
C
hr
M.D. to investigate whether Dr. Brown and others violated USADAs anti-doping rules, making
of
O
op
y
1.
ffic
e
I.
PARTIES AND INTERESTED PERSONS
Pan American and Paralympic Movement Sport in the United States. Congress has determined
ial
C
that USADA shall serve as the independent antidoping organization for the amateur athletic
fic
competitions recognized by the United States Olympic Committee and be recognized worldwide
2.
Un
of
athletic activities recognized by the United States Olympic Committee are prevented from using
21 U.S.C. 2001(b)(1).
Page 1
USADA seeks the oral videotaped deposition duces tecum of Jeffrey Stuart
Brown, M.D. (Dr. Brown). Dr. Brown is a board certified endocrinologist in Houston, Texas
ist
ric
tC
ler
k
and was at relevant times a member of USA Track & Field (USATF), the governing body for
track and field in the U.S. Dr. Brown resides in Harris County and may be served pursuant to
Rule 21a at his medical practice, Endocrine Associates of Houston, 909 Dairy Ashford Street,
nie
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202.2(b)(2) provides that a Rule 202 Petition may
is
1.
Da
II.
VENUE
lD
Suite 205, Houston, Texas 77079. Dr. Browns telephone number is (281) 589-2681.
C
hr
be brought in a proper court of any county where the witness resides, if no suit is yet anticipated.
of
Dr. Brown resides in Harris County. Since USADA is investigating potential claims or suit,
C
1.
III.
FACTS
op
y
O
ffic
e
ial
thereafter assumed the anti-doping responsibilities previously shared by the United States
fic
Olympic Committee (USOC) and more than forty National Governing Bodies (NGBs) which
2.
Un
of
the United States. USATF athletes and athlete support personnel (including doctors) are subject
to the anti-doping rules of the USOC and USADA which USADA is authorized to enforce.
21 U.S.C. 2001(b)(2).
Page 2
3.
Given the information provided by these individuals and the cross-country travel
for the sole purpose of receiving treatments from Dr. Brown, the information raises questions
5.
ist
ric
tC
ler
k
about whether some of these treatments may have violated sport anti-doping rules.
USADA has received consents from many of these individuals, including patients
of Dr. Brown, to interview Dr. Brown concerning whether his treatments have been in
lD
compliance with sport anti-doping rules. However, despite the voluntary cooperation of these
nie
individuals and specific written authorizations from them to discuss treatments received from Dr.
Da
Brown with USADA, Dr. Brown has, to date, refused to discuss with USADA treatments given
hr
C
6.
is
to these individuals.
e
of
Brown and his legal counsel to attempt to get Dr. Brown to cooperate with USADA and to
ffic
comply with the consents given by his patients for Dr. Brown to speak with USADA. Based on
op
y
O
these communications, USADA reasonably believes that it has exhausted all reasonable efforts
ial
7.
C
Un
of
fic
Brown to investigate treatments given by Dr. Brown to these individuals; the substances used in
those treatments and methods of administration of the treatments; personnel and/or entities
involved setting up and administering those treatments; why the treatments were initiated; and
any information pertaining to whether such treatments and other treatments and communications
in which Dr. Brown has been involved violate or relate to violations of sport anti-doping rules.
This information will assist USADA in its ongoing efforts to investigate whether Dr. Brown
and/or others may have violated sport anti-doping rules.
PETITIONER USADAS VERIFIED RULE 202 PETITION
Page 3
8.
involving Dr. Brown and others will prevent USADA from unnecessarily commencing legal
proceedings that may or may not be warranted based on the incomplete information currently
known about Dr. Browns treatments and Dr. Browns refusal, to date, to communicate with
ist
ric
tC
ler
k
USADA about these treatments. For this reason, the likely benefit of allowing USADA to take
an oral videotaped deposition duces tecum to investigate any potential claims against Dr. Brown
and others subject to its protocol and the relevant anti-doping rules is the most efficient way to
lD
proceed and greatly outweighs the burden and expense of allowing the requested deposition to
nie
proceed.
Da
FOR THESE REASONS, USADA requests that the Court set a date for hearing on this
hr
is
Petition and, after the hearing, issue an order authorizing USADA to take an oral video-taped
Respectfully submitted,
Un
of
fic
ial
C
op
y
O
ffic
e
of
C
Page 4
VERIFICATION
STA TE OF INDIANA
COUNTY OF MARION
nie
lD
ist
r
ict
C
ler
k
BEFORE ME, via telephone, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day William Bock,
III and, after being duly sworn, stated under oath that he is General Counsel for the United States
Anti-Doping Agency; that he has read the above Petition; and that the factual statements
contained in the Petition are within his personal knowledge and are true and correct.
hr
is
Da
....
CAROLE LKING
ffic
e
of
C
My commission expires:
f/PJL. ~ 3,
Pt>P-.~
Un
of
fic
ial
C
op
yO
Miiion CountJ
, M Camml11lon E.,ires Mir 23, 2024
Page 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that on June 23rd, 2016, the foregoing Rule 202 Petition was
served, pursuant to Rule 202.3, on the following by Fax and Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, in accordance with Rule 21a:
lD
ist
ric
tC
ler
k
Un
of
fic
ial
C
op
y
O
ffic
e
of
C
hr
is
Da
nie
Page 6