The Transparency of Things

Contemplating the
Nature of Experience

Rupert Spira

Non-Duality Press
 First published November 2008 by Non-Duality Press

© Rupert Spira 2008

Rupert Spira has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act, 1988, to be identified as author of this work.

All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or

by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior permission
in writing from the Publishers.

Typeset in Aldus 11/13

Cover design by Rupert Spira and John Gustard

Non-Duality Press, Salisbury, SP2 8JP

United Kingdom

ISBN 978-0-9558290-5-5

www.non-dualitybooks.com
This book is written with gratitude and love for Ellen, my
companion, and Francis Lucille, my friend and teacher.
Contents

Foreword · xi

The Garden Of Unknowing ............................................................ 1

Clear Seeing .................................................................................... 4
What Truly Is .................................................................................. 9
Everything Falls Into Place ........................................................... 17
Abide As You Are.......................................................................... 25
The Drop Of Milk ......................................................................... 28
Consciousness Shines In Every Experience ................................. 34
Ego ................................................................................................. 44
Consciousness Is Its Own Content ............................................... 50
Knowingness Is The Substance Of All Things ............................ 58
Our True Body .............................................................................. 61
‘I’ Am Everything ......................................................................... 67
What We Are, It Is ....................................................................... 72
Peace And Happiness Are Inherent In Consciousness ................ 82
Consciousness Is Self-Luminous .................................................. 94
The Choice Of Freedom ................................................................ 98
The Ease Of Being ....................................................................... 102
Knowingness ...............................................................................114
There Are Not Two Things ......................................................... 118
Knowing Is Being Is Loving ....................................................... 128

vii
Changeless Presence.................................................................... 131
Time Never Happens .................................................................. 137
Unveiling Reality ........................................................................ 143
We Are What We Seek ............................................................... 145
Nature’s Eternity ......................................................................... 152
Consciousness And Being Are One ............................................ 166
The Fabric Of Self ........................................................................169
The True Dreamer ....................................................................... 173
The Here And Now Of Presence ................................................ 185
Consciousness Is Self-Luminous ................................................ 188
Consciousness Only Knows Itself .............................................. 192
Consciousness Is Freedom Itself ................................................. 194
It Has Always Been So ................................................................ 202
Sameness And Oneness .............................................................. 205
A Knowing Space .........................................................................210
Consciousness Peace ‘I’ ............................................................... 215
Just This ....................................................................................... 218
The Doer ...................................................................................... 221
Origin, Substance And Destiny ................................................. 225
Love In Search Of Itself .............................................................. 227
Openness Sensitivity Vulnerability And Availability .............. 234
Time And Memory ..................................................................... 243
The Moon’s Light ........................................................................ 249
The Natural Condition ................................................................ 257

viii
“That which is, never ceases to be. That which is not,
never comes into being.”
Parmenides
Foreword

This book is a collection of contemplations and conversations about

the nature of experience. Its only purpose, if it can be said to have
any purpose at all, is to look clearly and simply at experience itself.

The conventional formulations of our experience are, in most

cases, considered to be so absolutely true as to need no further
investigation. Here, the opposite is the case. Absolutely nothing is
taken for granted, save the conventions of language that enable us
to communicate.

From an early age we are encouraged to formulate our experience

in ways that seem to express and validate it, and these expressions
subsequently condition the way the world appears.

‘David loves Jane,’ ‘Tim saw the bus.’ Our earliest formulations
divide experience into ‘I’ and ‘other,’ ‘me’ and ‘the world,’ a subject
experiencing an object. From that time on, our experience seems to
validate these formulations.

However, at a certain stage it begins to dawn on us that these

formulations do not express our experience, but rather they condi-
tion it.

This book does not address the particular qualities of experience

itself. It explores only its fundamental nature. What is this ‘I’? What
is this ‘other,’ this ‘world’? And what is this ‘experiencing’ that
seems to join the two together?

The essential discovery of all the great spiritual traditions is the

identity of Consciousness and Reality, the discovery that the fun-
damental nature of each one of us is identical with the fundamental
nature of the universe.

xi
This has been expressed in many different ways. ‘Atman equals
Brahman.’ ‘I and my Father are one.’ ‘Nirvana equals Samsara.’
‘Emptiness is Form.’ ‘I am That.’ ‘Consciousness is All.’ ‘There are
not two things.’ ‘Sat Chit Ananda.’

Every spiritual tradition has its own means of coming to this under-
standing, which is not just an intellectual understanding, but rather
a Knowingness that is beyond the mind. And within each tradition
itself there are as many variations on each approach as there are
students.

This book explores what it is that is truly experienced. “What is the

nature of our experience in this moment?” is the question that is
returned to again and again.

However, this is not a philosophical treatise. It is a collection of con-

templations and conversations in which a few core ideas are explored
over and over again, each time from a slightly different angle, and
for this reason there is an inevitable element of repetition.

In some ways this book is written like a piece of music in which a sin-
gle theme is explored, questioned, modulated and restated. However,
each time the central theme is returned to, it will, hopefully, have
gathered depth and resonance due to the preceding contemplation.

The meaning of the words is not in the words themselves. Their

meaning is in the contemplation from which they arise and to which
they point. The text, therefore, is laid out with lots of space in order
to encourage a contemplative approach.

Having said that, the conclusions drawn are only meant to uproot
the old, conventional and dualistic formulations that have become
so deeply embedded in the way we seem to experience ourselves and
the world.

Once these old formulations have been uprooted, they do not need
to be abandoned. They can still be used as provisional ideas that have
a function to play in certain aspects of life.

xii
The new formulations are perhaps closer or more accurate expres-
sions of our experience than the old ones, but their purpose is not to
replace the old certainties with new ones.

They simply lead to an open Unknowingness, which can be for-

mulated from moment to moment in response to a given situation,
including a question about the nature of experience.

There are many ways to come to this open Unknowingness, and the
dismantling of our false certainties through investigation is just one
of them that is offered here.

If our attention were now to be drawn to the white paper on which

these words are written, we would experience the uncanny sensation
of suddenly becoming aware of something that we simultaneously
realise is so obvious as to require no mention. And yet at the moment
when the paper is indicated, we seem to experience something new.

We have the strangely familiar experience of becoming aware of

something which we were in fact already aware of. We become
aware of being aware of the paper.

The paper is not a new experience that is created by this indication.

However, our awareness of the paper seems to be a new experience.

Now what about the awareness itself, which is aware of the paper? Is
it not always present behind and within every experience, just as the
paper is present behind and within the words on this page?

And when our attention is drawn to it, do we not have the same
strange feeling of having been made aware of something that we
were in fact always aware of, but had not noticed?

xiii
Is this awareness not the most intimate and obvious fact of our expe-
rience, essential to and yet independent of the particular qualities
of each experience itself, in the same way that the paper is the most
obvious fact of this page, essential to and yet independent of each
word?

Is this awareness itself not the support and the substance of every
experience in the same way that the paper is the support and the
substance of every word?

Does anything new need to be added to this page in order to see the
paper? Does anything new need to be added to this current experi-
ence in order to become aware of the awareness that is its support
and substance?

When we return to the words, having noticed the paper, do we lose

sight of the paper? Do we not now see the two, the apparent two,
simultaneously as one? And did we not always already experience
them as one, without realising it?

Likewise, having noticed the awareness behind and within each

experience, do we lose sight of that awareness when we return the
focus of our attention to the objective aspect of experience? Do we
not now see the two, the apparent two, Awareness and its object,
simultaneously as one? And has it not always been so?

Do the words themselves affect the paper? Does it matter to the

paper what is said in the words? Does the content of each experience
affect the awareness in which it appears?

Every word on this page is in fact only made of paper. It only expresses
the nature of the paper, although it may describe the moon.

Every experience only expresses Awareness or Consciousness,

although experience itself is infinitely varied.

Awareness or Consciousness is the open Unknowingness on which

every experience is written.

xiv
It is so obvious that it is not noticed.

It is so close that it cannot be known as an object and yet is always

known.

It is so intimate that every experience, however tiny or vast, is utterly

saturated and permeated with its presence.

It is so loving that all things possible of being imagined are contained

unconditionally within it.

It is so open that it receives all things into itself.

It is so spacious and unlimited that everything is contained within it.

It is so present that every single experience is vibrating with its

substance.

It is only this open Unknowingness, the source, the substance and

the destiny of all experience, that is indicated here, over and over
and over again.

Rupert Spira
October 2008

xv
The Garden Of Unknowing

The abstract concepts of the mind cannot apprehend Reality although

they are an expression of it.

Duality, the subject/object polarization, is inherent in the concepts

of the mind. For instance, when we speak of the ‘body’ we refer to
an object, which in turn implies a subject. If we explore this object
we discover that it is non-existent as such and is in fact only a
‘sensation’.

However, a ‘sensation’ is still an object and further exploration

reveals that it is in fact made of ‘sensing,’ of ‘mind stuff,’ rather than
anything physical.

However, ‘sensing’ in turn is discovered to be made of ‘knowing.’ And

if we explore ‘knowing’ we find that it is made of Consciousness.

If we explore Consciousness we find that it has no objective qualities.

And yet it is what we most intimately know ourselves to be. It is
what we refer to as ‘I.’

And if we explore ‘I’ we find it is made of…

The abstract concepts of the mind collapse here. They cannot go any
further. There is no adequate name for that into which the mind dis-
solves. We are taken to the utmost simplicity of direct experience.

This de-objectification is the process of apparent involution through

which That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named withdraws its projection of
the mind, body and world, and rediscovers that it is the sole sub-
stance of the seamless totality of experience.

That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named, the Absolute Emptiness into which

the mind collapses, then projects itself, within itself, back along the

1
same path of apparent objectification, to recreate the appearance of
the mind, body and world.

That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named, and yet which is sometimes referred

to as ‘I,’ Consciousness, Being, Knowingness, takes the shape of
thinking, sensing or perceiving in order to appear as a mind, a body
or a world.

This is the process of apparent evolution through which That-

Which-Cannot-Be-Named gives birth to a mind, a body and a world,
without ever becoming anything other than itself.

This process of evolution and involution is the dance of Oneness,

That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named taking shape and dissolving, vibrat-
ing in every nuance of experience and dissolving itself into itself,
transparent, open, empty and luminous.

Mind attempts to describe the modulations of this emptiness mani-

festing itself as the fullness of experience and this fullness recognis-
ing itself as emptiness, knowing all the time that in doing so it is
holding a candle to the wind.

Mind describes the names and forms through which That-Which-

Cannot-Be-Named refracts itself, in order to make itself appear
as two, as many, in order to make Consciousness/Being appear as
Consciousness and Being.

And using the same names and forms, mind describes the apparent
process through which That-Which-Cannot-Be-Named discovers
that it never becomes anything, that it is always only itself and itself
and itself.

Each statement that is made here is provisionally true in relation to

one statement but false in relation to another. However, it is never
absolutely true.

The purpose of every statement is to indicate the falsity of the previ-

ous one, only to await its own imminent demise.

2
Each is an agent of Truth, but never true.

Mind, in the broadest sense of the word*, is made of concepts and

appearances. It never frames or grasps Reality itself.

However, by speaking in this way, mind is being used to create evo-

cations rather than descriptions of the experience of Consciousness
knowing itself.

These evocations are temporary expressions of That-Which-Can-

not-Be-Named, like flowers blossoming for a moment, shedding the
perfume of their origin on the Garden of Unknowing.

*The word ‘mind’ is used in two ways in this book. The first, as in this
sentence, includes (a) thinking and imagining, (b) sensing (referring to
bodily sensations) and (c) perceiving (referring to seeing, hearing, tast-
ing, smelling and touching, through which the world is ‘known’). In this
case the body and the world are understood to be projections of the mind.
The second refers only to thinking and imagining. In most cases the latter
meaning is intended, but occasionally mind is referred to in its broader
meaning.

3
Clear Seeing

All that is happening in these contemplations is the clear seeing of

the essential nature of experience. There is no attempt to change
or manipulate it, to create a peaceful or happy state, to get rid of
suffering or to change the world. There is simply the clear seeing of
the true nature of this current experience.

This clear seeing is not an intellectual understanding, although it

may be formulated provisionally in intellectual terms when required
by the current situation. Rather, it is the direct, intimate and imme-
diate knowing of ourselves resting in and as the formless expanse of
Presence, and simultaneously dancing in the vibrancy and aliveness
of every gesture and nuance of the body, mind and world.

The clear seeing of what is has a profound effect on the appearance

of the mind, the body and the world, but that is not the object of this
investigation. There is no object to this investigation.

Even the purpose of ‘seeing clearly’ turns out to be too much in

the end. It is the thorn that removes the thorn, and when even this
last trace of becoming has been dissolved in understanding, it too is
abandoned, leaving only Being.

However, in most cases this exploration is a prelude to the revelation

of Being. We start with experience and stay close to it. We do not
start with a theory, a model, a map or a teaching, and then try to
fit our experience into that model. Absolutely nothing is taken for
granted.

We start with experience and we end with experience. We allow the

naked clarity of experience itself to relieve itself of the burden of
duality.

4
We simply look at the facts of experience. “Is it true of my experi-
ence in this moment?” That is the only reference point.

The few core beliefs and preconceived ideas that we hold about the
nature of ourselves and the world are exposed in this disinterested
investigation. We do not do anything to these beliefs. We are not
trying to destroy them but rather to expose them.

Belief and doubt are two sides of the same coin. When a belief is
exposed it is found either to be true, in which case the belief becomes
a fact and the doubt that was implicit in it is dissolved, or it is found
to be false, in which case both the belief and the doubt will naturally
come to an end.

Any feelings or patterns of behaviour that were dependent on the

belief that has been exposed will, in due time, naturally dissolve,
simply because they are no longer nourished by the belief. They die
of neglect.

These feelings and patterns of behaviour are the counterpart at the

level of the body to beliefs at the level of the mind, and their dissolu-
tion is accomplished in the same way. What was an investigation at
the level of the mind, is an exploration at the level of the body.

In this exploration these feelings and patterns of behaviour are

exposed, and in this exposure, their power to separate is revealed
to be non-existent. Separation is not simply understood to be an
illusion. It is felt as such.

No longer nourished by belief, these feelings are exposed and, as

such, are seen for what they are. They die of the fierce clarity of
being clearly seen.

This dissolution of beliefs and feelings has a profound effect on our

lives, our ideas, our relationships, our bodies, our work, the world,
in fact on everything.

5
However, the purpose of this investigation and exploration is not to
change anything. It is simply the clear seeing of what is, and clear
seeing is the shrine on which Being shines.

This line of investigation could be likened to taking several MRI

scans of an apple. With each scan the apple is sliced up in different
ways, each one showing a new section or point of view.

However, the apple is never touched in this process. It always remains

just as it is, whole, untouched, unmodified, undivided. It only appears
to be divided, and this appearance gives a more complete picture of
its true undivided nature.

It is the same with our experience. The contemplations in this book

are like MRI scans of our experience. They look at experience from
many angles, spreading it out, opening it up. However, our experi-
ence itself is always one.

It is always a seamless, unified totality with no separate parts, and

its nature is always only pure Consciousness. That is a fact of experi-
ence and it never changes, even if we think it to be otherwise.

This line of enquiry comes from the truth of direct experience and
therefore leads back to it. It leads to the Reality of experience, to the
experience of Consciousness knowing itself, knowingly. It is ruthless
and tender at the same time, and utterly simple.

It is sometimes thought that this kind of enquiry is intellectual and

abstract and seems to bear little relation to our day to day experi-
ence. However, it is only because our conventional dualistic concepts
about the nature of Reality are themselves so densely interwoven
with abstract and erroneous ideas that they require some meticulous
deconstruction.

6
In this case it has not yet been seen that what are considered to
be our normal, common sense assumptions, are in fact themselves
intellectual and abstract – that is, they have little to do with the facts
of experience.

By the end of the book I hope it will be clear that it is in fact our
conventional ways of seeing that bear little relation to our actual
moment by moment experience.

And, by contrast, I hope that the formulations expressed here will be

understood as simple and obvious statements about the nature of our
experience, albeit within the limited confines of the mind.

For instance, it is usually considered a fact of indisputable common

sense that the body and the world exist as physical objects in time
and space, independent and separate from Consciousness. Any line
of reasoning that suggests that this is not the case, that there may
be only the experience of Consciousness knowing itself in and as
objects, is sometimes considered to be intellectual and abstract.

However, it is precisely the idea that the body and the world exist as
objects in time and space, independent and separate from Conscious-
ness, that is intellectual and abstract. It is not based on experience.
And by the same token, the idea that there is only the experience
of Consciousness knowing itself in and as objects, becomes a self-
evident, obvious and indisputable fact of experience.

Of course the appearance of physical objects continues, but appear-

ance is no longer mistaken for Reality.

However, it would be a misunderstanding to think that appearances

have to disappear for Reality to be revealed. It is simply that the
misinterpretation is no longer superimposed onto experience.

The body and the world continue to appear in the same way, but it is
clearly seen that the experience of the appearance of the body and the
world takes place simultaneously with the experience of Conscious-
ness knowing itself. It is the same experience, one experience.

7
The experience of Consciousness knowing itself knowingly in and as
all appearances, becomes as obvious and self-evident as the previous,
apparently obvious and self-evident experience of objects existing in
time and space, independent and separate from Consciousness.

8
What Truly Is

Whatever it is that is seeing and understanding these words, is what

is referred to here as ‘Consciousness.’ It is what we know ourselves
to be, what we refer to as ‘I.’

Everything that is known is known through Consciousness.

Therefore whatever is known is only as good as our knowledge of
Consciousness.

What do we know about Consciousness?

We know that Consciousness is, and that everything is known by

and through it. However, Consciousness itself cannot be known as
an object.

If Consciousness had any objective qualities that could be known,

it would be the Knower of those qualities, and would therefore be
independent of them. We cannot therefore know anything objective
about Consciousness.

Therefore, if we do not know what Consciousness is, what ‘I’ am, but
we know that it is, and if everything that we experience is known
through or by this knowing Consciousness, how can we know what
anything really is?

All we can know for sure about an object is that it is, and that quality
of ‘isness’ is what is referred to here as Being or Existence. It is that
part of our experience that is real, that lasts, that is not a fleeting
appearance. It is also therefore referred to as its Reality.

We know that Consciousness is present now and we know that

whatever it is that is being experienced in this moment, exists. It has
Existence.

9
If we think that we know something objective about ourselves or
the world, then whatever that something is that we think we know,
will condition our subsequent enquiry into the nature of experience.
So before knowing what something is, if that is possible, we must
first come to the understanding that we do not know what anything
really is.

Therefore the investigation into the nature of ourselves and of

the world of objects initially has more to do with the exposure of
deeply held ideas and beliefs about the way we think things are,
than of acquiring any new knowledge. It is the exposure of our false
certainties.

Once a belief that we previously held to be a fact is exposed as such,

it drops away naturally. Whether or not something further than
the exposure of our false ideas about the nature things needs to be
accomplished, remains to be seen. We cannot know that until all
false ideas have been removed.

Many of our ideas and beliefs about ourselves and the world are so
deeply ingrained that we are unaware that they are beliefs and take
them, without questioning, for the absolute truth.

For instance, we believe that we are a body, that we are a man or a

woman and that we were born and will die. We believe that we are
an entity amongst innumerable other entities, and that this entity
resides somewhere in the body, usually behind the eyes or in the
chest area.

We believe that we are the subject of our experience and that eve-
rything and everyone else is the object. We believe that we, as this
subject, are the doer of our actions, the thinker of our thoughts, the
feeler of our feelings, the chooser of our choices. We believe that this
entity we consider ourselves to be, has freedom of choice over some
aspects of experience but not others.

We believe that time and space are actually experienced, that they
existed before we did and will continue to do so after we have died.

10
We believe that objects exist independent of their being perceived,
that Consciousness is personal and limited, that it is a by-product of
the mind and that mind is a by-product of the body.

These and many other such beliefs are considered to be so obviously

true that they are beyond the need of questioning. They amount to
a religion of materialism to which the vast majority of humanity
subscribes. This is especially surprising in areas of life that purport
to deal explicitly with questions about the nature of Reality, such as
religion, philosophy and art.

The only field available for enquiry is experience itself. This may seem
almost too obvious to mention, but its implications are profound. It
implies that we never experience anything outside experience. If there
is something outside experience, we have absolutely no knowledge of
it, and therefore cannot legitimately assert that it exists.

This in turn implies that if we are to make an honest investigation

into the nature of Reality, we have to discard any presumptions that
are not derived from direct experience. Any such presumptions will
not relate to experience itself and will therefore not relate to our-
selves or the world. If we honestly stick to our experience, we will be
surprised to find how many of our assumptions and presumptions
turn out to be untenable beliefs.

All experience takes place here and now, so the nature of Reality,
whatever that is, must be present in the intimacy and immediacy of
this current experience.

‘I,’ Consciousness, is present, and something, these words, the sound

of the traffic, a feeling of sadness, whatever it is, is also present.

We do not know what this Consciousness is. Nor do we know what

the Reality of these words or the current experience is. However,
there is the Consciousness of something and there is the Existence
of that something. Both are present in this current experience.

What is the relationship between them?

11
 §

The mind has built a powerful edifice of concepts about Reality that
bears little relation to actual experience and, as a result, Conscious-
ness has veiled itself from itself. These concepts are built out of mind
and therefore their deconstruction is one of the ways through which
Consciousness comes to recognise itself again – that is, to know itself
again.

Consciousness is in fact always knowing itself. However, through

this deconstruction of concepts, Consciousness comes to recognise
itself, not through the reflected veil of apparent objects, but know-
ingly and directly.

Concepts are not destroyed in this process. They are still available
for use when needed.

In the contemplations that comprise this book it is acknowledged

that the purpose of reasoning is not to frame or apprehend Real-
ity. However, it is also acknowledged that the mind has constructed
complex and persuasive ideas that have posited an image of ourselves
and of the world that is very far from the facts of our experience.

These ideas have convinced us that there is a world that exists sepa-
rate from and independent of Consciousness. They have persuaded
us to believe that ‘I’, the Consciousness that is seeing these words, is
an entity that resides inside the body, that it was born and will die,
and that it is the subject of experience whilst everything else, the
world, ‘other,’ is the object.

Although this is never our actual experience, the mind is so persua-

sive and convincing, that we have duped ourselves into believing
that we actually experience these two elements, that we experience
the world separate and apart from our Self, and that we experience
our own Self as a separate and independent Consciousness.

12
In the disinterested contemplation of our experience we measure the
facts of experience itself against these beliefs.

The falsity of the ideas that the mind entertains about the nature of
Reality, about the nature of experience, is exposed in this disinter-
ested contemplation.

All spiritual traditions acknowledge that Reality cannot be appre-

hended with the mind. As a result of this understanding some
teachings have denied the use of the mind as a valid tool of enquiry
or exploration.

It is true that Consciousness is beyond the mind and cannot there-

fore be framed within its abstract concepts. However this does not
invalidate the use of the mind to explore the nature of Consciousness
and Reality.

Ignorance is composed of beliefs and belief is already an activity of

mind. If we deny the validity of mind, why use it in the first place
to harbour beliefs?

By reading these words, we are, consciously or unconsciously, agree-

ing to accept the validity and, by the same token, the limitations of
the mind.

We are giving the mind credibility in spite of its limitations. We are

acknowledging its ability to play a part in drawing attention to that
which is beyond itself or outside the sphere of its knowledge.

It would be disingenuous to use the mind to deny its own validity.

Our very use of the mind asserts its validity. However, it is a differ-
ent matter to use the mind to understand its own limits.

It may well be that at the end of a process of exploring the nature

of experience, using the full capacity of its powers of conceptual
thinking, the mind will come to understand the limits of its ability
to apprehend the truth of the matter and, as a result, will spontane-
ously come to an end. It will collapse from within, so to speak.

13
However, this is a very different situation from one in which the
mind has been denied any provisional credibility on the basis that
nothing it says about Reality can ultimately be true.

As a result of the exposure of beliefs and feelings that derive from

preconceived, unsubstantiated notions of Reality, a new invitation
opens up, another possibility is revealed.

This possibility cannot be apprehended by the mind because it is

beyond the mind. However, the obstacles to this new possibility are
revealed and dissolved in this investigation.

They are dissolved by our openness to the possibility that in this

moment we actually experience only one thing, that experience is
not divided into ‘I’ and other, subject and object, me and the world,
Consciousness and Existence.

We are open to the possibility that there is only one single, seamless
totality, that Consciousness and Existence are one, that there is only
one Reality.

The edifice of dualistic ideas, which seems to be validated by experi-

ence, is well constructed with beliefs at the level of the mind and
feelings at the level of the body, which are tightly interwoven,
mutually substantiating and validating one another.

In the disinterested contemplation of these ideas and feelings their

falsity is unraveled. We see clearly that our ideas do not correspond
to our experience. This paves the way for experience to reveal itself
to us as it truly is, as in fact it always is, free from the ignorance of
dualistic thinking.

We begin to experience ourselves and the world as they truly are.

Our experience itself does not change but we feel that it changes.
Reality remains as it always is, for it is what it is, independent of the
ideas we entertain about it.

14
However, our interpretation changes and this new interpretation
becomes the cornerstone of a new possibility.

This new possibility comes from an unknown direction. It does not

come as an object, a thought or a feeling. It is unveiled, in most
cases, as a series of revelations, each dismantling part of the previous
edifice of dualistic thinking.

And the unfolding of this revelation, in turn, has a profound impact

on the appearance of the mind, the body and the world.

Consciousness veils itself from itself by pretending to limit itself to

a separate entity and then forgets that it is pretending.

As a corollary to this self-limitation, Consciousness projects all that

is not this ‘separate self,’ outside of itself. This projection is what we
call ‘the world.’ And thus the separation between ‘I’ and ‘the world’
is born.

In reality this separation has never taken place. If we look for it, we
can never actually find it. Ignorance is an illusion. It is an illusion
that is wrought through the conceptual powers of the mind, through
erroneous beliefs.

These beliefs are created and maintained through a process of

deluded thinking – that is, by thinking that bears no relation to
actual experience. The dissolution of these beliefs is accomplished by
exploring and exposing them, using direct experience as the guiding
reference.

Nothing new is created by this process of exploration. Its purpose

is not enlightenment or self-realisation. It is simply to see clearly
what is.

15
Our beliefs are the root cause of psychological suffering and they
are dismantled by a process of contemplative investigation.

What we normally consider to be a line of investigation begins

with assumptions that are considered to be implicitly true. In this
contemplation we start with the same assumptions, but we measure
them against the truth of our experience. We do not build on them,
we deconstruct them.

This line of reasoning leads to understanding. However, under-

standing does not take place in the mind. It is beyond the mind.
It is a moment when Consciousness experiences itself directly and
knowingly.

Understanding is not created by a process in the mind any more

than blue sky is created by a clearing in the clouds. However, it may
be revealed by it.

Understanding is often preceded by a line of enquiry and can subse-

quently be formulated by the mind. Such a formulation, that comes
from understanding and not from concepts, has the power to take us
to the experience of Reality.

Through its reasoning powers the mind is brought to its own limit
and, as a result, the edifice of mind collapses. This is the experience
of understanding, the timeless moment in which Consciousness is
revealed to itself.

Consciousness perceives itself. It knows itself, knowingly.

16