Intentional Torts Chart
Intentional Torts Chart
TORT: The study of civil wrongs without a contact for which the law provides a remedy.
Intent: Is the desire or knowledge to bring about harm or the substantial certainty (97%)
that the harm will occur.
Transferred Intent: A person who suffers an intentional tort need not prove that the actor
intended the tort to apply to him.
• Assault, Battery, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Realty, Trespass to Chattel
Battery
An intentional harmful or offensive touching to another person.
Intentional Touching Harmful or Offensive
Transferred -This does not have to be person to -A reasonable person would find
Intent applies person it offensive
- Can be something you caused to come -Account for social norms
in contact with them -least touching in anger is
- The person does not have to be aware offensive
of the touching (kissing someone
sleeping)
Assault
An intentional act causing an imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive touching to
another person.
Intent Imminent Apprehension Harmful or
Offensive
Transferred -About to happen. - A feeling of anxiety or fear -A reasonable person
Intent applies -Can be either that something bad or would find it offensive
present acts or unpleasant will happen -Account for social
words. -any sensory indication norms
-Not future threats. -They have to know!
IIED
Intentional or reckless act that is extreme or outrageous conduct intended to cause severe
emotional harm to another person.
Intentional Outrageous & Extreme Causation Sever Distress
or Reckless
There is no Measured by social standards. Usually it is Physical harm-most
Transferred Courts frequently find IIED where implied states require a
Intent. there is an authoritative physical
relationship or economic manifestation of
motivation. harm.
It must be
measurable.
Examples: Migraine headache
creditors can be measured
landlords through blood
funeral homes. vessels.
Conversion
The intentional exercise of dominion and control over a chattel, which seriously interferes
with the possessor’s right of control.
Extent/duratio Intent to Actors good Harm done to Inconvenience
n of control assert right faith chattel & expense
and caused to
interference possessor
Hypos
You are at a restaurant and leave with the wrong hat. Extent & duration → minimal
You realize this just after leaving and return the hat Intent → yes, to take the hat
immediately Good faith → yes
Harm done → none
Inconvenience & expense → little
Not Conversion
You are at a restaurant and leave with the wrong hat. Extent & duration → minimal
You realize this after going home. You call the Intent → yes, to take the hat
restaurant that is closing and arrange to return it first Good faith → yes
thing in the morning. Harm done → none
Inconvenience & expense → little
Not Conversion
You are at the restaurant and leave with the wrong Extent & duration → permanent
hat. You realize this just after leaving but then the hat Intent → yes, to take the hat
blows off your head and falls into the drainage system. Good faith → NA
Harm done → yes, hat is gone
Inconvenience & expense → hat is
gone
Is a Conversion
This is a sliding scale, any one or a compilation of them could cause it to be a
conversion.
Privilege
Implied consent-look at customs and usage
Example: when we participate in a sport we waive our right not to get hurt unless it is not
expected or unreasonably outside the rules of the sport.
In Florida, it is not specified whether you need to be home if you have set a mantrap.