Str. 36-37 Leociak
Str. 36-37 Leociak
Str. 36-37 Leociak
Different witnesses accounts depict the experience of the Holocaust a borderline event leaving behind widespread trauma in different ways, using different forms of narrative construal
Central to the work described herein is the concept of narrative attitudes: i.e. discernible and describable tendencies to relate stories of a certain type, to construe stories of the past in a specific way. The source materials for this analysis were drawn from the accounts deposited at the Shoah Foundation Institute at University of Southern California in Los Angeles, which has amassed some 52,000 interviews conducted in the late 1990s with Holocaust survivors and witnesses. These archives contain a total of 1471 interviews in Polish, and 314 interviews with Polish individuals who assisted Jews. The present author listened to more than 80 Polish interviews. My familiarity with the source materials, although incomplete, is representative enough to enable me to posit the first, still preliminary diagnoses and hypotheses. In these interviews I identify three types of narrative, which I describe as intelligentsia narratives mainly because they reflect certain distinctive properties of the intellectual condition. Firstly professionalism, involvement in a group of highly qualified specialists in a given field, secondly fluency with various modes of expression that invoke cultural traditions, and thirdly the conscious construal of autobiographical narration as being subject to literary and esthetic demands.
Interviews with Holocaust witnesses evidence different approaches to discussing this borderline event
the scope of reflection, reconstructing collective memory based on many different sources) on the other.
36
The ground floor of Leavey Library, University of Southern California, houses the USC Shoah Foundation Institute for Visual History and Education
The interview situation nonetheless does make an indelible mark on this type of narration, making it better described as a constrained gawda. We can observe here a clash between the impetuous core of the oral gawda and the fixed rigors of an interview, between free composition and formalized interview structure set by the previously composed questionnaire. The expectations and dispositions of the witness and the interviewer come into collision. The storyteller narrative specifically harks back to later development of the gawda oral folktale into a storytelling genre by Polands szlachta nobility, and thereby invokes the direct historical antecedent of the intelligentsia social stratum which sprang mainly from the impoverished nobility and dclass landed gentry. This style of narration also encapsulates a certain vision of the world, distinctly emphasized in the message formulated at the end of the given interview: the traditions of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a multiethnic, open, and tolerant noble republic.
characterize the relations between the protagonists of the story (between Poles and Jews), as well as to portray their individual traits. The main storyline is interspersed with commentary, reflection, and evaluation. The stress is laid on the dynamics of the related events. There is an evident concern for stressing temporal and causal links. Dialogues are used to dramatize the narrative. Novel-like narrative signals that the life being recounted here appears only as a consciously devised narrative construction, dovetailing with literary traditions. Biography is treated as a text, and as it is recounted the narrative I yields to creative processes. This type of recounting ones own past experiences seems to fit well with a certain characteristic property of intellectual discourse: an awareness of not just ones own distinctiveness, but also forms of expression used in communicating with the world and in self-presentation.
Further reading:
Jedlicki J. (2001). O czym si mwi, gdy si mwi o inteligencji? [What Do We Mean When We Speak of the Intelligentsia?]. [In:] Kowalska H. (Ed.). Inteligencja. Tradycja i nowe czasy [Intelligentsia Tradition and New Times]. Krakw: WUJ. Mikuowski-Pomorski J. (2001). Etos warstw spoecznych. Inteligencja. Midzy pastwem a samodzielnym wyborem [The Ethos of Social Strata: The Intellegentsia Between the State and Individual Choice]. [In:] Kowalska H. (Ed.). Inteligencja. Tradycja i nowe czasy [Intelligentsia Tradition and New Times]. Krakw: WUJ. bikowski A. (Ed.). (2006). Polacy i ydzi pod okupacj niemieck 19391945 [Poles and Jews Under German Occupation 19391945]. Warsaw: IPN. Yow R.V. (2005). Recording Oral History. A Guide for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Second edition. Altamira Press.
37
No. 2 (22) 2009
Jacek Leociak