Plaintiffs sought to purchase custom furniture items from a corporate defendant. After complaining about the quality of the plaintiffs' sample, the corporate defendant cancelled the contract. Plaintiffs commenced this action against the corporate defendant and against the individual defendants. Defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the claims for failure to state a cause of action.
Original Description:
Original Title
Successful Motion to Reargue in New York County Supreme Court
Plaintiffs sought to purchase custom furniture items from a corporate defendant. After complaining about the quality of the plaintiffs' sample, the corporate defendant cancelled the contract. Plaintiffs commenced this action against the corporate defendant and against the individual defendants. Defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the claims for failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiffs sought to purchase custom furniture items from a corporate defendant. After complaining about the quality of the plaintiffs' sample, the corporate defendant cancelled the contract. Plaintiffs commenced this action against the corporate defendant and against the individual defendants. Defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the claims for failure to state a cause of action.
Defendant Scott Nago's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Partial Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment, Democratic Party of Hawaii v. Nago, No. CV13-00301 JMS/KSC (Sep. 16, 2013)