Final Solutions
Final Solutions
(ii) (4 points) What kind of goods are root beer and ice cream for Jane? Show her indifference curves on a graph. Answer: Root beer and ice cream are perfect substitutes for Jane. Her indierence curves will look like in the graph above, with a slope of 1 (the negative of the marginal rate of substitution between the two goods). 1
(iii) (4 points) Suppose that Jane and John decide to have a private party. John brings one bottle of root beer (8 glasses) and Jane brings one box of ice cream (16 scoops). Represent this two-consumer, two-good exchange economy in an Edgeworth box, remembering to indicate the endowment point. Answer: The Edgeworth box will look like in the graph below, where A represents the endowment point.
8 A Jane
John
root beer
ice cream
16
(iv) (4 points) Find the contract curve in this economy. Answer: The contract curve is given by the points of tangency of the two sets of indifference curves. Note that these points will always be the kinks of Johns indierence curves. For simplicity, we can just take the contract curve to be the set of all kinks, that is, the line starting from Johns origin and having a slope of 0.5, as shown in the graph below (to be strict, it would be only the points right before a kink, but taking the whole line would be a perfectly ne answer).
8 A Contract curve root beer Jane
John
ice cream
16
(v) (4 points) What is the equilibrium point in this Edgeworth box? What is the price ratio? (Hint: At the equilibrium, the slope of the budget line is equal to the slope of the indierence curves or is tangent to them, and the budget line has to pass through the endowment point.) Answer: At the equilibrium, the budget line is has the same slope as the two indierence curves at their point of tangency. Johns indierence curves do not have a slope at the kink (or you can think of them as having potentially any slope), while Janes have a slope of 1. Hence, the budget constraint should have a slope of 1, meaning that it basically overlaps Janes indierence curve. Also, the budget lines should pass through the endowment point. This means that the equilibrium is given by the tangency point between Janes indierence curve that passes through the endowment point and Johns indierence curves, as shown in the graph below. Although you didnt need to, you could actually calculate the quantities that John and Jane get at the equilibrium. Janes indierence curve passes through the endowment point, meaning that the sum of her allocation of ice cream and root beer is equal to 16. So, the sum of Johns quantities is 8 (since the sum of the total quantities is 16 scoops of ice cream plus 8 glasses of root beer = 24). Also, John consumes root beer and ice cream in a proportion of 1 : 2, so this means that he will have 8 glasses of root beer and 16 scoops of ice cream. This, 3 3 in turn, means that Jane will get 8 8 = 16 glasses of root beer and 16 16 = 32 scoops of 3 3 3 3 ice cream (again, abstract from the fact that this is not a multiple of two). Finally, the price ratio is 1 (the negative of the slope of the budget constraint).
8 root beer Jane
8 3
John
16 3
ice cream
16
(iv) (3 points) What was the prot per ride in 1995, neglecting any costs associated with acquiring a taxicab license? Answer: The marginal cost of a ride is constant, so it is also the cost per ride. In this case, the prot per ride is p M C = 6 5 = $1. (v) (4 points) What was the prot per taxicab license per day in 1995? Answer: Each taxicab runs 20 trips per day, so the prot per taxicab (license) is 201 = $20.
(vi) (4 points) How much money would each current taxicab owner be willing to pay to prevent any new licenses from being issued? Answer: In a competitive equilibrium, each taxicab owner would earn zero prots. Therefore, they would be willing to pay the dierence between the current prots ($20) and the competitive equilibrium prots ($0), i.e., $20, to avoid new licenses being issued.
(ii) (3 points) Derive the rms short-run marginal cost function. Answer: The short-run marginal cost of the rm is: M CSR (Q) = V CSR (Q) = 3Q2 20Q + 30. Q
(iii) (3 points) Find the optimal (cost-minimizing) level of production for the rm. Answer: At the optimal production level, the short-run marginal and average costs are equal: M CSR (Q) = ACSR (Q) 3Q2 20Q + 30 = Q2 10Q + 30 2Q2 10Q = 0 2Q(Q 5) = 0 Q = 5.
(iv) (3 points) Calculate the short-run marginal and average cost at this production level. Answer: The short-run marginal and average cost when Q = 5 are: M CSR (5) = ACSR (5) = 3 52 20 5 + 30 = 75 100 + 30 = 5. (v) (3 points) Find the prot-maximizing level of production for the rm. Answer: The cost-minimizing and prot-maximizing levels of production are the same, so Q = 5 is also the prot-maximizing level of production.
(vi) (6 points) If the market price is p = $18, how much would the rm decide to produce? (Note: If you obtain two possible values for Q, choose the highest.) Answer: The rm will choose the level of output according to the marginal output rule, i.e. it will choose to produce at the level that equates the marginal cost and the price: M CSR (Q) = p 3Q2 20Q + 30 = 18 3Q2 20Q + 12 = 0 20 202 4 3 12 20 256 20 16 = = Q = 6. Q= 23 6 6
(vii) (6 points) Calculate the economic prot of the rm when the market price is p = $18 (remember that only variable costs are economic costs). How much will the prot be in the long run if the rm operates in a perfectly competitive market? Answer: The economic prot of the rm is (Q) = pQ V CSR (Q), so rst we need to calculate the variable cost when Q = 6: V CSR (6) = 63 10 62 + 30 6 = 216 10 36 + 180 = 36. Then, the economic prot of the rm is (6) = 18 6 36 = 72. In a perfectly competitive market, new rms will enter as long as there are prots to be made. Hence, in the long run, prots will be driven down to zero.
21
robots
28
workers
(ii) (3 points) Suppose that the combination of 10 robots and 8 workers is minimizing the cost of producing 100 Teddy-bears. Is this combination on the $4, 200 isocost line? Show on a graph how this optimal mix of inputs would be found by the rm. Answer: The cost of 10 robots and 8 workers is 10 200 + 8 150 = $3, 200, so this point is not on the $4, 200 isocost line, but on the $3, 200 line. The rm would nd this optimal input mix as the tangency point of the 100 Teddy-bears isoquant to the $3, 200 isocost, as shown in the graph below.
robots 16 10
21.33
workers
(iii) (3 points) If the marginal physical product of labor is 5 at the cost minimizing input bundle in the previous part, solve for the marginal physical product of capital. Answer: At the optimum, the ratio of the marginal physical products is equal to the ratio of the corresponding prices: M P PL w = M P PK r 5 150 = M P PK 200 M P PK = 5 200 = 6.67. 150
(iv) (2 points) For the next questions, suppose that the wage of a worker increases to $200. How do the isocost lines change? Answer: The slope of the isocost lines is given by the negative of the price ratio. If the price of labor (the wage) changes, then the slope of the isocost lines becomes 200 = 1, 200 meaning that the isocost lines become steeper. (v) (2 points) How does the total cost change if the rm decides to keep producing 100 Teddy-bears? Answer: When the isocost lines become steeper, the $3, 200 isocost line does not touch the 100 Teddy-bears isoquant anymore. The isocost line needs to shift out, as shown in the graph below. This, in turn, means that the total cost has to increase.
robots 16 2 10 1
16
21.33
workers
(vi) (2 points) How does the optimal mix of inputs change? Answer: As shown in the graph above, the optimal input mix shifts from point 1 to point 2, which involves the use of less workers (the inputs experiencing a price increase) and more robots.
(ii) (2 points) What is the equilibrium quantity supplied and demanded? Answer: The equilibrium quantity supplied and demanded is Qs = Qd = 200 5 20 = 100. (iii) (3 points) Calculate the consumer surplus at the equilibrium price. Answer: To calculate the consumer surplus, let us rst graph the demand and the supply (see graph below).
$
40 20 13.33 40 100
The consumer surplus can be calculated as the area under the demand curve and above the price: CS = 1 20 100 = 1000. 2 (iv) (3 points) Calculate the producer surplus at the equilibrium price. Answer: The producer surplus is the area above the supply curve and below the price. Technically, it should be only the area above the horizontal axis, which can be calculated as the dierence between the areas of the big and the small triangles in the graph above: 1 P S = 2 (20 + 13.33) 100 1 13.33 40 = 1, 400. However, the area of the big triangle is 2 an acceptable answer as well: P S = 1 33.33 100 = 1, 666.67. 2 (v) (1 point) Calculate the total surplus at the equilibrium price. Answer: The total surplus is the sum of the consumer and the producer surplus: T S = CS +P S = 1, 000+1, 400 = 2, 400 (or, if you used the area of the big triangle as the measure of producer surplus, T S = 1, 000 + 1, 666.67 = 2, 666.67. 9
(vi) (3 points) Now suppose that the government imposes a tax of $8 per each pound sold, paid by the consumers, which eectively reduces the quantity sold and demanded to 85 pounds. In this case, what are the price and the consumer surplus? Answer: If consumers pay the tax, that eectively acts as to shift the demand curve down by $8, as shown in the graph below.
$
40 32 15 13.33 85 200 Q
Since the consumers pay the tax, the new demand function is actually: Qd = 200 5(p + 8) = 200 5p 40 = 160 5p, which means the intercept with the vertical axis is now 160 = 32. 5 As we know the equilibrium quantity demanded, this gives us the equilibrium price: 85 = 160 5p p = $15.
Finally, the consumer surplus is now the area of the smaller triangle: CS = 1 (32 15) 2 85 = 722.5.
10
$ S 2 1 D1 D2 200 Q
(ii) (4 points) Draw a diagram to illustrate the case of a shift in demand and/or supply curves that is consistent with the observed change in prices and quantities. Answer: In order for the equilibrium price to rise and the equilibrium quantity to fall, what would need to happen is for the supply curve to shift inward, as in the graph below.
$ 2 1 S2 S1
D 200 Q
11