Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allergic Rhinitis - University of Michigan
Allergic Rhinitis - University of Michigan
Allergic Rhinitis
Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Team
Richard Orlandi, MD Otolaryngology James Baker, MD Allergy Margie Andreae, MD Pediatrics Daniel Dubay, MD General Internal Medicine Steve Erickson, PharmD Pharmacy Consultant: Jeffrey Terrell, MD Otolaryngology Developed
Patient population: Adults and pediatrics Objectives: The purpose of this guideline is to assist in the diagnosis and cost-effective treatment of
allergic rhinitis.
Key Points:
Diagnosis. Allergic rhinitis is an antigen-mediated inflammation of the nasal mucosa that may extend into the paranasal sinuses. Diagnosis us usually made by history and examination (itchy, running, sneezy, stuffy). A symptom diary and a trial of medication may be helpful to confirm a diagnosis. Allergy testing is rarely helpful in diagnosis. Allergy testing is not commonly needed to make the diagnosis, but may be helpful for patients with multiple potential allergen sensitivities Therapy. The goal of therapy is to relieve symptoms. 1. Avoidance of allergens is the first step in this process. (see text for details). If avoidance fails: 2. Over-the-counter (OTC) antihistamines and decongestants should be tried initially, as they provide relief in most cases. If symptoms persist, consider the following options: 3. Prescribed medications: Nasal corticosteroids are considered the most potent medications available for treating allergic rhinitis [A*]. They control itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and stuffiness in most patients, but do not alleviate ocular symptoms. They have a relatively good safety profile, but long-term perennial use, as well as prolonged use in children, may be problematic. UMHS preferred medications in this class are Flonase, Nasacort AQ, and Nasonex AQ. Oral antihistamines prevent and relieve itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea, but tend to be less effective for nasal congestion [A*]. If an initial trial with a first-generation (OTC) antihistamine is unsuccessful or poorly tolerated, a second-generation antihistamine may be substituted. UMHS preferred prescription antihistamines include Allegra and Zyrtec . Second generation antihistamines are less sedating, but are expensive. Intranasal antihistamines, while effective in treating the nasal symptoms associated with seasonal and perennial rhinitis and nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis, offer no therapeutic benefit over conventional treatment [A*]. Oral decongestants decrease swelling of the nasal mucosa which, in turn, alleviates nasal congestion [A*]. They are contraindicated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and in uncontrolled hypertension and severe coronary artery disease. Geriatric patients may be more sensitive to the effects of decongestants. Nasal cromolyn is less effective than nasal corticosteroids [A*]. Cromolyn is a good alternative for patients who are not candidates for corticosteroids. It is most effective when used regularly prior to the onset of allergic symptoms. Referral. Appropriate criteria for referral to a colleague who specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of allergies may include [D*]: consideration of allergy skin/RAST testing for better allergen identification for avoidance and/or immunotherapy, because of: - failure of medical therapy - perennial allergic rhinitis that is moderate to severe associated conditions such as chronic or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis. any severe allergic reactions causing patient or parental anxiety. Controversial Issues Medication vs. immunotherapy. A formal risk/cost-benefit analysis of medication therapy versus immunotherapy (allergy shots) has not been performed; however, patients with moderate to severe symptoms that continue year round (i.e., perennial allergic rhinitis) may benefit most from immunotherapy [D*].
* Levels of evidence reflect the best available literature in support of an intervention or test : A=randomized controlled trials; B=controlled trials, no randomization; C=observational trials; D=opinion of expert panel.
These guidelines should not be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding other acceptable methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific clinical procedure or treatment must be made by the physician in light of the circumstances presented by the patient.
Discuss treatment options with patient (Table 3, Figure 2) Possible referral indicated? (Table 4) No Initiate Treatment: 1) avoidance education 2) trial of medication as indicated in Table 5
Yes
Refer to specialist
Satisfactory response?
No
Yes Follow up periodically. Discuss complications & potential long term side effects of treatment (Tables 6 & 7).
Consider alternative diagnoses (Table 2) and evaluate as indicated. Consider: limited sinus CT scan other diagnostic tests treatment trial referral
Facial pressure or pain, purulent nasal discharge; maxillary toothache; failure to respond to decongestants; fever or cough may be present; may follow an allergy flare -up or a viral URI Chronic rhinosinusitis Facial pressure or pain, purulent discharge; fever often absent; may be present in addition to allergic rhinitis; symptoms may wax and wane over time; chronic hyposmia. Viral URI Self-limited course with symptoms (clear rhinorrhea, cough, ache) usually resolving within 3-7 days Septal deviation Nasal obstruction is often constant and unilateral; deflection can often be seen on examination Rhinitis medicamentosa Also called rebound rhinitis; caused by overuse of topical decongestants; diagnosis is easily made by history; may mask another underlying condition such as septal deviation or allergic rhinitis. Vasomotor rhinitis Clear rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, often depends on position (e.g ., supine), may be episodic. Pregnancy may exacerbate symptoms Atrophic rhinitis Also call ozena; caused by over-resection of turbinate tissue or poor mucus production, resulting in nasal dryness and crusting; foul odor may be present; rarely secondary to klebsiella ozaenae infection Gastroesophageal reflux Under-recognized cause of post-nasal drip, cough, and globus sensation; hoarseness or frequent throat clearing may also be present
2 UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline, Month, 2002
Medications Patient preference (See also: Tables 5 & 6) Rapid onset May control non-allergic rhinitis symptoms Many choices (See Tables 5&6) Allergy Testing (RAST or Skin testing) Immunotherapy Beneficial in defining allergens in complex patients or to institute immunotherapy May help direct avoidance therapy Medication requirements usually reduced Benefits may persist after therapy has stopped May be less costly in long term
Effectiveness of treatment is uncertain Frequent visits for years: - Year 1: Initial visit (exam & testing) + 26 weekly shot visits + 13 bi-weekly shot visits - Year 2: 26 bi-weekly shot visits - Years 3-5: 18 shot visits (21-day interval) Potential unknown long term side effects Anaphylaxis (rare)
Intolerance to, or failure of medical treatment (See Table 7) Associated comorbidities such as chronic or recurrent Any severe allergic reaction which causes patient or parental bacterial rhinosinusitis, or recurrent otitis media anxiety Need for improved allergen avoidance education Immunotherapy is a consideration (See also: Table 6)
Table 5. Pharmacologic Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis (UMHS Preferred Agents in Bold)
Generic Name Brand Name Usual Adult Dose 30 Day AWP Cost* 12 yrs: 6 to 11 yrs: 2 to 5 yrs: 6 to 11 yrs: 6 to 11 yrs: 2 to 5 yrs: 12 yrs: Usual Pediatric Dose 30 Day AWP Cost*
Oral Antihistamines 1 st Generation Chlorpheniramine Chlor 4 12 mg hs or 2 - 12 mg BID Trimeton Clemastine Diphenhydramine Brompheniramine Tavist-1 Benadryl Dimetapp 1.34 mg 2x / day 25 50 mg q 6-8 h 48 mg 3 4x / day 12 mg q 12 h as extended-release tablet 2 mg 4x / day or 4 mg 3x / day 6 mg as extended release tablet q 8 to 12 h 1-2 mg 2x / day 25 100 mg 3 4x / day
$1 g
$7 g $5 g $5-10 g $6
4 - 12 mg hs or 2 - 12 mg BID 2 - 8 mg q d - BID, 12 mg/d max 2 - 6 mg q d - BID 0.37 mg twice daily 12.525 mg every 46 hrs 6.25 mg every 46 hrs
$1 g $1 g $1 g
$7 g $4-$8 g $3 g
4 mg q 4 hrs 12 mg q 12 h as extended release tablet 6 to 11 yrs: 2 mg q 4 hrs 2 to 5 yrs: two droppers full (1.6 mL) every 46 hrs 12 yrs: 2 mg 4x / day or 4 mg 3x / day 6 mg as extended release tablet q 812 h 6 to 11 yrs: 1 mg 4x / day 2 to 5 yrs: 0.5 mg q 46 h 12 yrs: 12 mg 2x / day 6 to 11 yrs: 12.5 25 mg 4x / day 2 to 6 yrs: 0.5 mg/kg every 6 hrs (patient is 20 kg & syrup used) 6 to11 yrs: 12.5 mg every 4-6 hours /day 2 to 6 yrs: 6.25 mg every 4-6 hours/ day 12 yrs: 6 to 11 yrs: 6 and older: 2 to 5 yrs: NA 6 yrs: NA NA 12 yrs: 60 mg 2x / day or 180 mg once daily 30 mg 2x / day 510 mg once daily 2.5 or 5 mg once daily
Dexchlorpheniramine
Polaramine
$16 g $18 g
g g g g
Azatadine Hydroxyzine
Optimine Atarax
$60-$120 $3-$10 g
Phenindamine
Novahist
nd
25 mg every 4 to 8 hours
$19$38
Oral Antihistamines 2 Generation Fexofenadine Allegra 60 mg twice daily or 180 mg once daily Cetirizine Fexofenadine and pseudoephedrine Loratadine Loratadine and pseudoephedrine desloratadine Oral Decongestants Pseudoephedrine Zyrtec Allegra D Claritin Claritin D Claritin D-24 Clarinex Various 510 mg once daily 60 mg twice daily 10 mg once daily 1 tab q 12 hr (5 mg 120 mg) 1 tab q 24 hr (10 mg 240 mg) 1 tab q 24 hr (5 mg) 30 - 60 mg q 4-6 h 120 mg as extended release tab q 12 h
10 mg once daily
$75
1 tab q 24 hr (5 mg)
$66 $2 g $1 g
Table 5. Pharmacologic Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis, Continued (UMHS Preferred Agents in Bold)
Generic Name Brand Name Usual Adult Dose 30 Day AWP Cost* Usual Pediatric Dose 30 Day AWP Cost
Intra-Nasal Corticosteroids Fluticasone propionate Mometasone Triamcinolone acetonide Flonase 4 sprays as a single daily dose or in 2 divided doses; may increase up to 8 sprays as single daily dose 4 sprays as single daily dose Nasacort aerosol: 4 sprays as single dose, may increase up to 8 sprays as single dose or divide into 2-4 doses Nasacort Nasal spray: 4 sprays as single daily dose 8 sprays / day in 2 divided daily doses or as single dose $58 4 yrs: 2 sprays as single daily dose; may increase up to 4 sprays as single daily dose 3 to 11 yrs: 2 sprays as single daily dose 6 to 11 yrs: 4 sprays as single daily dose $29-$58
Nasonex Nasacort
$44 $51-$102
$22 $51
$54 $48
6 to 12 yrs: 2-4 sprays as single daily dose 12 yrs: 2 sprays as single dose, may increase up to 8 sprays as single dose 6 to 11 yrs: 2 sprays as single dose, may increase up to 4 sprays as single dose 6 to 12 yrs: 6 sprays / day in 3 divided doses 6 to 12 yrs: 4 sprays / day in 2 divided doses 6 yrs: 2 to 4 sprays as single dose
Flunisolide
Nasalide, Nasarel
Beclomethasone dipropionate
Budesonide
Beconase aerosol: 4-8 sprays / day in 24 divided doses Beconase AQ: 4-8 sprays / day in 2 divided doses Vancenase AQ: 2-4 sprays / day as single dose Rhinocort aerosol: 8 sprays / day in 2 divided doses or as single daily dose Rhinocort Aqua Spray: 2 sprays as a single daily dose, may increase up to 8 sprays / day 2 sprays EN (each nostril) 2x / day
$47-$94
6 to 11 yrs: 2 sprays as single daily dose, may increase to 4 sprays as single daily dose 12 yrs: 2 sprays EN (each nostril) 2x / day 5 to 11 yrs: 1 spray EN 2x / day 6 to 12 yrs: 2 or 3 drops or sprays of 0.05% BID 2 to 5 yrs: 2- 3 drops 0.025% BID 6 yrs: 1 spray EN 3-4 times daily
$47
Intra-Nasal Antihistamine Azelastine nasal spray Oxymetazoline Astelin $26 $26 $13 $3 $3 $5
Intra-Nasal Mast Cell Stabilizers Cromoglycate, cromolyn sodium Ipratropium bromide Nasalcrom 1 spray EN 3-4x / day $5
Intra-Nasal Anticholinergic Atrovent 0.06% solution, 2 sprays EN 3-4x / day $38 12 yrs: 0.06% solution, 2 sprays EN 3-4x / day 6 to 12 yrs: 0.03% solution, 2 sprays EN 2-3x / day $38 $44
Table 5. Pharmacologic Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis, Continued (UMHS Preferred Agents in Bold)
Generic Name Ocular Decongestants Naphazoline Oxymetazoline Many (e.g., Albalon) Visine LR, OcuClear Many (e.g., Mydfrin) Many (e.g., Visine) 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) up to 4x / day 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) repeated as needed every 6 hrs or as directed by physician 1 drop in affected eye(s), repeat in 1 hr if necessary 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) up to 4x / day 1 drop affected eyes up to 4x / day 1 drop affected eyes up to 4x / day 1-2 drops in affected eyes 2x / day at interval of 6-8 h $3 g $3 g NA 6 years: all ages 6 years: 1 or 2 drops in affected eye(s), may be repeated as needed q 6 h 1 drop in affected eye(s), repeat in 1 hr if necessary (avoid 10% solution in infants) 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) up to 4x / day $3 g Brand Name Usual Adult Dose 30 Day AWP Cost* Usual Pediatric Dose 30 Day AWP Cost*
Phenylephrine Tetrahydrozoline
$4 $1 g
$4 $1 g
NA 4 yrs: 4 yrs:
1 drop affected eye up to 4x / day 1-2 drops in affected eye 2x / day at interval of 6-8 h
$44 $63
Ocular Non-Prescription Antihistamine/Decongestant Combinations Naphazoline & Naphcon-A 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) up to 4x / pheniramine day Naphazoline & Vascon-A 1-2 drops in affected eye(s) up to 4x / antazoline day as needed Ocular Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS) Ketoralac Acular 1 drop 4x / day
$8 $6
NA NA
$50
NA
Ocular Mast Cell Stabilizers Lodoxamide tromethamine Cromolyn Alomide Opticrom 1-2 drops in affected eye 4x / day 1-2 drops affected eye 4-6x / day $57 $12 g 2 yrs: 4 yrs: 1-2 drops in affected eye 4x / day 1-2 drops in affected eye 4-6x / day $57 $12
Note: For brand drugs, Average Wholesale Price from First Data Bank, 11/2001. For generic drugs, Wholesale Acquisition Cost from Amerisource Bergen Wholesale Catalog, 11/2001
X X X X
Table 7. Possible Side Effects Associated with Medical Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis
Antihistamines Anticholinergic effects blurred vision dry mouth urinary retention impaired reflexes (impaired performance, psychomotor performance) Corticosteroids Nasal/Topical Preparations Nasopharyngeal Sensory coughing smell: reduced sense of smell epistaxis taste: unpleasant taste, loss of taste nasal irritation: burning, crusting, dryness pharyngitis septal perforation Decongestants General tachycardia palpitations nervousness headache insomnia drowsiness dizziness weakness Intra-Nasal burning swelling stinging sneezing increased discharge Mast Cell Stabilizers Nasal Preparations Nasopharyngeal Sensory epistaxis taste: unpleasant taste nasal irritation: burning, Stinging sneezing Ocular Preparations headache ophthalmic irritation: burning, dryness, pruritus, stinging Ocular burning conjunctivitis stinging eyelid eczema / transient pain dermatitis Ocular Preparations glaucoma (elevated intra-ocular pressure) infection: - secondary ocular infection - exacerbation of infection ophthalmic irritation: burning, dryness, Pruritus, stinging Central nervous system drowsiness (decreased learning, increased accidents) cognitive impairment (any age; elderly) Gastrointestinal constipation GI upset nausea Weight gain Sensory taste: bitter taste, loss of taste
Clinical Background
Clinical Problem and Management Issues
Incidence. Allergic rhinitis, the most common form of rhinitis, affects 20-40 million people in the United States annually, including 10-30% of adults and up to 40% of children. Although the disease tends to be more prevalent among males during childhood, the gender ratio among adults is approximately equal. The severity of allergic rhinitis ranges from mild to seriously debilitating; its social and financial impact is significant. It accounts for in excess of 2.7 billion dollars in direct and indirect medical costs (1995 dollars) and is often associated with other conditions such as asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. When lost productivity due to drowsiness and cognitive/motor impairment related to over the counter antihistamine use were considered, the total cost estimate associated with allergic rhinitis increased to 5.3 billion dollars for 1996. Diagnosis . Allergic rhinitis is primarily diagnosed on the basis of history, with physical examination providing additional clues. Because of the significant overlap of its symptoms with those of other nasal conditions, diagnosis may not be straightforward. Allergy testing may help in the diagnosis but must be properly performed in order to avoid false negative results. Testing/referral . When history is not adequate for diagnosis, skin or RAST testing is helpful to (a) differentiate allergic from non-allergic rhinitis symptoms and (b) to identify specific allergens that may cause symptoms. Skin tests are more sensitive, faster, and more cost effective than RAST. However, skin testing needs to be performed by a trained physician using a cell-controlled process and interpreting results in light of local aeroallergens and their properties. Treatment. Treatment options for allergic rhinitis include environmental control (allergen avoidance), pharmacotherapy, and immunotherapy (allergy shots). Most treatment regimens employ one or more o f these options. While each option has been shown to be effective in treating allergic rhinitis, they have significant costs as well. Medications and changes in the home environment can result in sizable direct expenditures, while immunotherapy necessitates frequent office visits, often over a number of years. The effectiveness of a medication is related to the route of administration. Medication administered through the ocular route only addresses ocular systems; while no data exist regarding the relief of ocular symptoms with oral medications, expert opinion indicates that systemic drugs do provide some relief.
Epidemiology
Allergic rhinitis manifests in two forms. Seasonal allergic rhinitis tends to be associated with cyclical changes in the environment. In contrast, perennial allergic rhinitis does not exhibit a seasonal pattern; this may reflect the patients continuous exposure to the offending allergen (e.g., animal, house dust mites, occupational exposures). Distinguishing prevalence rates of seasonal versus perennial allergic rhinitis is comp licated by two factors: first, epidemiologic studies have focused primarily on seasonal allergic rhinitis (e.g., hay fever), and second, the symptom complex of perennial allergic rhinitis overlaps with those of seasonal allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, recurrent upper respiratory infections, and vasomotor rhinitis. Nevertheless, studies suggest that seasonal rhinitis (hay fever) occurs in 10-20% of the population.
Diagnosis
Adult, general. Assessment of a patient who presents with symptoms of allergic rhinitis begins with a detailed history regarding the pattern, frequency, duration, severity, and seasonality of symptoms (or lack thereof), response to medications, presence of coexisting conditions (especially atopic conditions), occupational exposure, environmental history, and identification of precipitating factors. Family history of atopic disease is often positive in patients with allergic rhinitis. An integral part of the assessment is an evaluation of the degree to which symptoms affect the patients quality of life, physical and social functioning, mental health, energy level, and general health perception. Response to previous medication trials should be assessed. Physical examination should be made of the external nose, nasal mucosa, secretions, turbinates, and septum. In the allergic patient, the nasal mucosa typically appears pale, swollen, and bluish-gray. Secretions tend to be clear and watery. Chronic or severe acute allergic rhinitis may be accompanied by a transverse crease across the bridge of the nose, particularly in children, as a result of the allergic salute (i.e., rubbing the nose to relieve nasal obstruction and itching). Allergic shiners (infraorbital dark skin discoloration) and facial pallor may also be present. Other causes for nasal obstruction should be sought or ruled out. Pediatric. Symptoms exhibited by children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis are indistinguishable from those of adults with the exceptions that pediatric patients
8 UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Month, 2002
have a greater frequency of the allergic salute and eye rubbing. These are linked to chronic nasal obstruction, which may lead to the allergic facies, a complex of infraorbital darkening, facial maldevelopment, including overbite, palatal arching, and molar flattening.
Testing
Testing is not indicated in most allergic rhinitis cases. Skin tests and RAST (radioallergosorbent test) identify the presence of IgE antibody to a particular allergen. Testing is helpful to (a) differentiate allergic from non-allergic rhinitis symp toms and (b) to identify specific allergens that may cause symptoms. A small minority of patients who undergo testing may be candidates for immunotherapy. Nasal smears identify the presence of neutrophils and eosinophils, the latter of which suggests an allergic disease. Skin tests are more sensitive, faster, and more cost effective than RAST testing. Antihistamines should be stopped 7-10 days (7 days to be safe) before skin testing, but do not need to be stopped prior to RAST serum tests. Skin testing should be performed by a physician trained in allergy testing and interpretation. Effective testing requires a well-controlled process with consistent application technique and proper precautions for patients who react to skin testing (approximately 1-10% of patients). A controlled environment and proper technique are vital to producing accurate and reproducible results. Interpreting skin or in-vitro tests for a specific IgE requires knowledge of locally-present aeroallergens, their clinical importance, and their cross-reactivity with botanically -related species. The number of skin tests needed may vary with the patients age, potential allergen exposures, and geographic region.
necessary, on an indoor cycle), minimizing the use of window or attic fans, and limiting outdoor activity. Showering or bathing after outdoor activity removes pollen from the hair and skin and helps avoid contamination of bedding. In highly sensitive patients, effective allergen avoidance may require severely curtailing the patients outdoor activity. Molds. Molds proliferate in both indoor and outdoor environments; most mold allergens are encountered through inhalation of mold spores. Patients can avoid outdoor molds by remaining indoors and using air conditioning on an indoor cycle; however, it is important to note that air conditioning units themselves may be heavily contaminated with mold. Indoor mold is influenced by the age and construction of the building, presence of basement or crawl space, type of heating system, and use of humidifiers and air conditioning. Indoor mold can be controlled somewhat via chemical and physical measures such as fungicides, careful cleaning of humidifiers and vaporizers, and placement of a plastic vapor barrier over exposed soil in crawl spaces. Dehumidifiers in basements and other damp areas may help reduce mold levels. The overall effectiveness of these measures, however, is dependent upon reducing relative humidity and condensation levels. House dust mites. Fecal residue from dust mites is the primary allergen in household dust. The dust mites principle food source is exfoliated human skin; as such, mite concentrations are highest in bedding, fabric -covered furniture, soft toys, and carpeting. While no effective means currently exist in the US for permanently eliminating mites from upholstered furniture and carpeting, physical and chemical barriers offer some relief. Physical barriers may include allergen-proof encasings for mattresses, pillows, box springs, and bedding, using plastic, wood, or leather furniture in lieu of upholstered furniture, and replacing carpeting with wood or vinyl flooring. Chemical barriers include using 3% tannic acid solution to denature dust mites in upholstered furniture and treating carpeting with Arcarosan, a compound containing benzyl benzoate. The effectiveness of chemical barriers depends upon their repeated application. Finally, while it is possible that air conditioning reduces mite numbers by lowering indoor humidity, evidence regarding the effect of air purifiers on alleviating dust mite allergy symptoms is either nonexistent (for electrostatic purifiers) or conflicting (for HEPA air purifiers). Similarly, cleaning heating ducts is of no demonstrated value. Animal allergens. All warm-blooded animals, including birds, are capable of sensitizing a susceptible allergenic patient. While exposures to mice, rats, guinea pigs, and farm animals constitute occupational hazards for some, the most common manifestations of animal allergy are to cats and dogs. Cat and dog allergens are notable for the ease and extent of their dissemination, particularly through passive means (i.e., transport on clothing). While significant cleaning measures are required to reduce cat and dog allergen levels to those found in environments not inhabited by cats or dogs, their effectiveness is limited. Such measures may include washing the animal itself on a weekly basis. Evidence in support of this practice is mixed,
9 UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Month, 2002
Treatment
Treatment by avoidance or environmental control. Avoidance of inciting factors (e.g., allergens, irritants, medications) is fundamental to the management of allergic rhinitis. Food allergies may cause rhinorrhea in young children but this is rarely the overriding symptom. Triggers for allergic rhinitis may be grouped into five major categories: pollens, molds, house dust mites, animals, and insect allergens (e.g., cockroaches, bee venom). The effectiveness of control measures instituted is assessed primarily by patient symptoms and the necessity of medications. Pollens. Pollen-triggering allergic rhinitis is principally derived from wind-pollinated trees, grasses, and weeds. In Michigan, the predominant sources of pollen vary with the season: April May = tree pollen May June early summer = grass pollen August September = weed pollen September October = seasonal mold). Reducing pollen exposure is important to the effective management of allergic rhinitis; this can be accomplished by closing doors and windows, using air conditioning (if
but washing should never be attempted by the allergic patient. If the allergenic animal is not to be removed from the home, confining it to an uncarpeted room with an electrostatic or HEPA air purifier may markedly reduce airborne allergens in the rest of the home. Insect allergens. Sources of insect allergens include cockroaches, crickets, flies, midges, and moths. Debris from these insects is associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. The most common of these, the cockroach allergen, is found on the insects body and in its feces. While careful sanitation practices are often effective in reducing or eliminating cockroaches, heavy infestation may require application of pesticides by a professional exterminator. Pharmacological therapy. Several classes of drugs comprise the mainstay of treatment of allergic rhinitis; of these, the primary ones are nasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. Nasal Corticosteroids. A number of studies have shown these drugs to be the most effective treatment of the itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and stuffiness associated with allergic rhinitis. Their effect is not immediate, however; onset of relief is seen on day 2 to 3 with effects reaching their peak at 2 to 3 weeks. Regular, consistent use is required to maintain a maximum effect. Nasal corticosteroids do not treat ocular symptoms. Nasal corticosteroids are well tolerated and have a relatively good safety profile. Newer, more potent formulations offer the advantages of once daily dosing, minimal to no systemic absorption, and demonstrated tolerability in pediatric patients. The incidence of adverse effects is between 5 -10%; local effects most commonly reported include sneezing, stinging, and burning or irritation. However, these effects are generally mild and do not preclude the use of intranasal preparations. Aqueous formulations are preferred because they are less irritating to the nasal mucosa. Oral antihistamines. Antihistamines are effective in reducing symptoms of itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea and should be tried with most patients as first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis. Antihistamines also reduce symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis, which are often associated with allergic rhinitis. While they tend to be less efficacious overall compared to the nasal steroids, antihistamines appear to be equally effective in blocking histaminemediated responses to allergens [A*]. All antihistamines appear to be equally effective. It is therefore recommended that therapy be initiated with first generation, over the counter agents in patients who can tolerate them. Generic chlorpheniramine is inexpensive and effective. Usual dosing recommendations are based on obsolete data, however. The tissue half-life of chlorpheniramine is 24 hours +/- 6 hours. Therapy should be initiated at 2 - 4 mg at bedtime, and increased by 2 - 4 mg every 2 - 3 days. The maximum single dose is 12 mg for adults, or 24 mg divided BID. There is no rationale for sustained-release chlorpheniramine. In patients who cannot
10
tolerate a sedating antihistamine during the daytime, giving chlorpheniramine in the evening only, or use of fexofenadine or cetirizine is recommended. Roughly 10% of patients experience sedation even with non-sedating antihistamines. No data indicate that combining an antihistamine and a nasal steroid produces improved symptomatic relief. Decongestants. Decongestants act on adrenergic receptors to produce vasoconstriction and decrease swelling of the nasal mucosa which, in turn, alleviates nasal congestion. Oral decongestants may be used until symptoms resolve. Although they have not been found to affect blood pressure significantly in patients with stable hypertension, oral decongestants (including combination products containing a decongestantsee below) should be used with caution in patients with unstable hypertension, ischemic heart disease, glaucoma, prostatic hypertrophy, or diabetes mellitus. Urinary retention in elderly males is a common side effect. Oral decongestants are contraindicated in patients using monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or having uncontrolled hypertension or severe coronary artery disease. In addition, geriatric patients may be more sensitive to the side effects of oral decongestants . Topical decongestants do not exhibit significant systemic absorption in usual doses, but due to the risk of rebound vasodilation (rhinitis medicamentosa) or atrophic rhinitis with chronic use, these agents have no role in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Combination antihistamine/decongestant. Patients for whom an antihistamine or decongestant alone fails to provide complete relief may benefit from an antihistamine/ decongestant combination; studies have show improved allergy symptom control when a decongestant has been added to antihistamine therapy [A*]. Decongestantcontaining products are approved only for patients 12 years of age and older; the cautions enumerated above for decongestant use also apply to combination products. Nasal cromolyn. Although less effective than intranasal corticosteroids, cromolyn is a good alternative for patients who are not candidates for corticosteroids. It is most effective when used regularly prior to the onset of allergic symptoms. The four times daily dosing can cause compliance problems. Adverse effects are minimal and include nasal irritation, sneezing, and unpleasant taste. Anticholinergics. Ipratropium bromide (Atrovent) is an effective anticholinergic spray for patients with severe vasomotor symptoms (profuse thin rhinorrhea). Anticholinergics decrease the production of mucus and diminish rhinorrhea. Both topical medications and oral preparations (usually first-generation antihistamines) have been shown to be effective. While it is plausible that thickening of the mucus could impair its clearance from the sinuses (thereby possibly precipitating acute rhinosinusitis), this phenomenon has not been documented despite numerous clinical trials with anticholinergic medications. The therapeutic effect of antihistamines is due to their anticholinergic properties. Therefore newer, less-sedating antihistamines are less likely to be effective.
UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Month, 2002
Nasal Antihistamines (Astelin). Intranasal antihistamines are effective in treating the nasal symptoms associated with seasonal and perennial rhinitis and nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis. When administered intranasally, the primary adverse effects are nasal burning and altered taste (i.e., bitter or metallic taste). While effective in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, Astelastine offers no therapeutic benefit over conventional treatment. Ocular Medications. Ocular medications are available as topical solutions or suspensions. They contain antihistamines, decongestants, combination antihistamines / decongestants, corticosteroids, or mast cell stabilizers (cromolyn sodium and lodoxamide). Side effects of ocular medications (except corticosteroids) are generally mild and include a brief stinging, burning sensation. Topical antihistamines can be used as needed for acute symptomatic relief and prophylaxis of allergic rhinitis with minimal systemic side effects. Sodium cromolyn has been shown to be effective for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis and should be administered on a regular basis. Lodoxamide has been shown to be as effective or more effective than sodium cromolyn in vernal conjunctivitis. Contact lens users should consult their eye care provider regarding the use of these products. Nasal saline. Saline sprays theoretically moisten the nasal cavity and promote mucous clearance. Many preparations, however, contain benzalkonium chloride, a preservative implicated in the rebound irritation seen in rhinitis medicamentosa . Steam inhalation may give some symptomatic relief, but there is some evidence of rebound congestion with this remedy as well. Immunotherapy. Allergen immunotherapy is defined as the repeated administration of specific allergens to patients with IgE-mediated conditions, for the purpose of providing protection against the allergic symptoms and inflammatory reactions associated with natural exposure to these allergens. Well-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that allergen immunotherapy is beneficial in the treatment of seasonal pollinosis caused by trees, grasses, weeds, and in the treatment of mold-induced rhinitis. Clinical studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in perennial allergic rhinitis caused by dust mites and animal sensitivity. Allergen immunotherapy should also be considered for patients who have experienced insect-induced hypersensitivity reactions after exposure to insect allergens. See Table 3 for advantages and disadvantages.
Associated conditions such as atopic dermatitis, asthma, or chronic or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis Any severe allergic reaction causing patient or parental worry.
Pregnancy
Allergic rhinitis has no predictable pattern during pregnancy; it may worsen, improve, or stay the same. Some of the hormonal changes associated with pregnancy may exacerbate symptoms. Rising progesterone and estrogen levels during pregnancy may increase glandular secretions, and vasodilation and increased blood volume may cause nasal vascular pooling. These changes may cause symptoms to worsen. In contrast, increased serum levels of free cortisol during pregnancy could improve symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Pregnancy risks associated with agents used to treat allergic rhinitis are grouped in two categories. The first category includes agents for which animal studies have not demonstrated a risk to the fetus, but for which there are no adequate studies in pregnant women. Among these, intranasal cromolyn should be considered a first-line agent in view of its topical application and reassuring gestational animal data. Chlorpheniramine should be considered the antihistamine of choice during pregnancy; if chlorpheniramine proves to be ineffective, tripelennamine should be tried next. Second-generation antihistamines should be reserved for women who clearly need an antihistamine but who have experienced unacceptable side effects with first-line antihistamines. Ideally, secondgeneration drugs should be used only after the first trimester. Finally, immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis may be continued during pregnancy as long as it provides benefit and does not cause systemic reactions, which could be harmful to both mother and fetus. Generally, immunotherapy should not be started during pregnancy.
Referral/Consultation
Appropriate criteria for referra l to a colleague who specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of allergies may include: Failure of oral/nasal medications Moderate-severe perennial symptoms Allergy skin/RAST testing to better identify allergens, to improve avoidance therapy, or initiate immunotherapy
11
Severe Asthmatics
Rhinitis can exacerbate asthma. However, desensitization does not improve asthma control, and other allergy treatments have not been shown to improve asthma control either.
UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Month, 2002
or services are discussed. Disclosure of a relationship is not intended to suggest bias in the information presented, but is made to provide readers with information that might be of potential importance to their evaluation of the information. Team Member Richard Orlandi, MD Daniel Dubay, MD Margie Andreae, MD James Baker, MD Steve Erickson, PharmD Jeffrey Terrell, MD Company Bayer Pharmaceuticals (none) (none) Pfizer, Merck, Adventis, Schering (none) (none) Relationship Consultant
Controversial Areas
Testing
Cytotoxicity testing, provocative and neutralization testing carried out by either intracutaneous or subcutaneous injection or sublingual administration, and measurement of specific and non-specific IgG4 have not been validated by accepted standards of scientific evaluation and as such are considered unproven, controversial, and inappropriate for diagnostic use.
Consultant
Annotated References
Stroebel R, Graft D, Takahashi M , et al. Health Care Guideline: Rhinitis. Bloomington, MN: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 2000. [www.icsi.org/guidelst.htm#guidelines] Evidence based guideline and algorithms for treatment of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. Dykewicz MS, Fineman S, Nicklas R, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Rhinitis: Parameter Documents of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, 1998; 81 (Part II): 463-468 Special issue reporting summary statements, guidelines, and algorithms prepared by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. Baker JR (ed.). Primer on Allergic and Immunologic Diseases (4th Edition). JAMA, 1997; 278 (22): 1799-2034. Special issue published every 5 years and devoted to many aspects of allergic, immunologic, and asthmatic disorders. In this issue, the discussions of immunodeficiency diseases and definition of immune dysfunction reflect advances in knowledge regarding genetic defects at specific points in the immune response. Also included are expanded treatments of immune physiology, cells of the allergic response, and cost benefits of therapeutic alternatives.
Disclosures
The University of Michigan Health System endorses the Guidelines of the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Standards of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education that the individuals who present educational activities disclose significant relationships with commercial companies whose products
12 UMHS Allergic Rhinitis Guideline Month, 2002