Employees Satisfaction at ROOTS PRECISION PRODUCTS PVT LTD, COIMBATORE
Employees Satisfaction at ROOTS PRECISION PRODUCTS PVT LTD, COIMBATORE
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
V.L.B.JANAKIAMMAL COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
COIMBATORE -
September 2008
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
HOD
Examiner
Date :
Place :
DECLARATION
Place : Sheetal.A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
SHEETAL.A
CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION
Acknowledgement
Contents
List of tables
List of charts
Abstract
1. Introduction
4. Findings
5. Suggestions
6. Conclusion
Appendices
Bibliography
LIST OF TABLES
S.No CONTENTS
3.4 Salary
3.19 Salary
3.34 Salary
S.No CONTENTS
3.4 Salary
3.19 Salary
3.34 Salary
Healthy and cordial relationship in the department will not only provide
healthy environment but also paves way for smooth flow of work,
increases productivity and qualitative performance.
3. Relationship with Colleagues:
Most firms do not have a choice whether or not it should appraise its
personnel and their performance of the hired personnel will be
evaluated by someone at sometime.
9. Management practices:
Primary Objective:
To find out the present level of employees satisfaction in RPPPL at three
levels namely executives, staffs and operators.
Secondary Objective:
§ To analyze the satisfaction level of employees.
§ To analyze work conditions.
§ To study the job security level among the employees.
§ To study how far the employees are satisfied with the training
activities of the company.
§ To study the welfare activities of the company.
§ To study relationship between employees and supervisors.
SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
SCOPE OF THE STUDY:
The success of an organization depends upon ability of his employees. It
is said that “A happy employee is producing employee“. This study was
conducted to know the satisfaction level of workers. It helps in identify the
problems of the workers and reason for those problems. It is used to rectify some
problems by giving suggestions and recommendations. It also refers to general
attitude of employees towards his job.
Roots was the first company in India to get the European Homologation
certificate from Germany. The company has had a tremendous growth in export
sectors and an enviable track record of over Rs. 35 million foreign exchange on
just under 4years. Roots horns are exported to over 25 countries world wide and
hold of about 60% of the Indian market share. The exports go to Canada, USA,
Brazil, Japan, Middle East, South Africa, China, Australia and South America etc.
It becomes the first company in the world to introduce musical air horn.
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
Research Methodology is a way to systematically solve the research
problem as it guides how research is done scientifically. It consist of different
steps that are generally adopted by the researcher to study his research problem
with the logic behind them.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design constitutes the blue print for the collection,
measurement and analysis of data. Thus research design is a conceptual
framework within the research is conducted.
Descriptive research:
It includes surveys and fact finding enquiries of different kind. The major
purpose of descriptive research is the description of the state of affairs as it
exists at present.
Exploratory research:
Exploratory research is concerned with the finding out any new problem
and development of hypothesis rather than their testing.
The research design of this project is description as it is used to accurately
portray the characteristics of a particular individual or a group accurately.
METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
This study pertains to collection of data from the primary source called the
primary data.
Primary data:
Primary data’s are those which are collected for the first time by the
researcher. It is the fresh data. In this project, the primary data was collected
through questionnaire from the employees of three levels namely the executives,
staffs and operators.
Secondary data:
Secondary data are those which have already been collected. In this
project, secondary source such as the magazines, certain published journals of
the company have been used to collect the information.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The instrument which has been utilized for the collection of data is the
questionnaire. Questionnaire is a Performa containing sequence of questions to
collect information from the respondent. Thus, questionnaire consists of number
of questions printed or typed in a definite order on a form or set of forms.
SAMPLING DESIGN:
A sample design is a definite plan for obtaining in sample from a given
population. It refers to the technique or the procedure the researcher would adopt
in selecting the items for the sample.
In this project, the samples have been selected from the population using
simple random sampling technique.
In this research the sampling unit being the employees of Roots Precision
Product Private Limited.
The size of the sample is 86 which includes 5 executives, 41 staffs and
40 operators out of a population of 102
3. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The success of the study rules on the clear interpretation of the data that
is presentation of qualitative information in an understandable way for the
purpose of this study statistical tools namely percentage analysis, chi-square
test, charts, graphics and diagram were used.
Classification, tabulation and charting of data are done with greater
clarity. Classification gives prominence to important information gathered
dropping out unnecessary details. The tabulation helps to simplify the
presentation of data and facilitate a comparison which enables the researcher to
quickly locate the desire information.
Statistical Tool used in this project is Percentage analysis and charts.
TABLES SHOWING EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
Category: Executive
Sample Size: 5
3.1. WORKING CONDITIONS:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the existing environment.
3.2. RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPERIORS AND COLLEAGUES
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the executives are satisfied with the
relationship with the superior and colleagues.
3.3. MOTIVATION ANDRECOGNITION:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the executives are satisfied with the
motivation and recognition.
3.4. SALARY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all of the executives are satisfied with
the salary that offered.
3.5. WELFARE FACILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
welfare facilities.
3. 6. JOB SECURITY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents feel they are
secured with their job.
3.7. GRIEVANCE HANDLING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the grievance handling.
3.8. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the performance appraisal.
3.9. TRAINING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the training the company offer for their job.
3.10. MANAGEMENT STYLE:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the style of management.
3.11. QUALITY POLICY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the quality policy.
3.12. CAREER COUNSELING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 3 60
DISAGREE 2 40
TOTAL 5 100
70%
60%
60%
50%
40%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERNCE:
From the above table it was observed that 93% of the respondents are satisfied
with the career counseling and the remaining 7% of the respondents are not
satisfied with the career counseling.
3.13. INDIVIDUAL’S GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the employees are satisfied with
the growth opportunities the organization offers for the individual.
3.14. GOALS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all of the employees are satisfied with
the goals and responsibilities the organization assigns.
3.15. IMAGE OF THE ORGANIZATION
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 5 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 5 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the employees are satisfied with
the image of the organization.
TABLES SHOWING EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
Category: Staff
Sample Size: 41
3.16. WORKING CONDITIONS:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 26 63
DISAGREE 15 37
TOTAL 41 100
70% 63%
60%
50%
37%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that nearly 63% of the respondents are
satisfied with the existing environment and 37% are not satisfied with existing
environment.
3.17. RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPERIORS AND COLLEAGUES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 92
DISAGREE 3 8
TOTAL 41 100
100% 92%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 8%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 92% are satisfied with the relationship
with the superior and colleagues and only 8% are not satisfied.
3.18. MOTIVATION AND RECOGNITION:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 36 87
DISAGREE 5 13
TOTAL 41 100
100%
87%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 13%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 87% of the employees are satisfied
with the motivation and recognition and the remaining 13% are not satisfied with
the motivation and recognition.
3.19. SALARY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 34 83
DISAGREE 7 17
TOTAL 41 100
90% 83%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
17%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 83% of the employees are satisfied
with the salary that offer and remaining 17% are not satisfied with the
remuneration they offer.
3.20. WELFARE FACILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 29 71
DISAGREE 16 29
TOTAL 41 100
80% 71%
70%
60%
50%
40%
29%
30%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 71% of the respondents are satisfied
with welfare facilities and 29% are not satisfied.
3.21. JOB SECURITY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 93
DISAGREE 3 7
TOTAL 41 100
100% 93%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
17%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 93% the respondents are satisfied
with the security they offer for the jobs and 7% the respondents are not satisfied
with the security they offer for the jobs.
3.22. GRIEVANCE HANDLING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 41 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 41 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the grievance handling.
3.23. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 41 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 41 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the performance appraisal.
3.24. TRAINING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 41 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 41 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the training the company offer for their job.
3.25. MANAGEMENT STYLE:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 39 95
DISAGREE 2 5
TOTAL 41 100
95%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
5%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 95% the respondents are satisfied
with the style of management and 5% the respondents are not satisfied with the
style of management.
3.26. QUALITY POLICY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 41 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 41 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the quality policy.
3.27. CAREER COUNSELING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 93
DISAGREE 3 7
41 100
100% 93%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
7%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERNCE:
From the above table it was observed that 93% of the respondents are satisfied
with the career counseling and the remaining 7% of the respondents are not
satisfied with the career counseling.
3.28. INDIVIDUAL’S GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 39 95
DISAGREE 2 5
TOTAL 41 100
95%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
5%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 95% the employees are satisfied with
the growth opportunities the organization offer for the individual and 5% are not
satisfied.
3.29. GOALS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 93
DISAGREE 3 7
TOTAL 41 100
100% 93%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
7%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 93% of the employees are satisfied
with the goals and responsibilities the organization assigns and 7% are not
satisfied.
3.30. IMAGE OF THE ORGANIZATION
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 41 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 41 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the employees are satisfied with
the image of the organization.
TABLES SHOWING EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
Category: OPERATORS
Sample Size: 40
85%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
15%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that nearly 85% of the respondents are
satisfied with the existing environment and 15% are not satisfied with existing
environment
3.32. RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPERIORS AND COLLEAGUES
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 36 90
DISAGREE 4 10
TOTAL 40 100
100% 90%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 10%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 90% of the employees are satisfied
with the relationship among the superiors and colleagues and remaining 10% are
not satisfied with it.
3.33. MOTIVATION ANDRECOGNITION:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 95
DISAGREE 2 5
TOTAL 40 100
95%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
5%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 95% of the employees are satisfied
with the motivation and recognition and the remaining 5% are not satisfied with
the motivation and recognition
3.34. SALARY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 34 85
DISAGREE 6 15
TOTAL 40 100
85%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
15%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that 85% of the employees are satisfied
with the salary that offer and remaining 15% are not satisfied with the
remuneration they offer.
3.35. WELFARE FACILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 12 30
DISAGREE 28 70
TOTAL 40 100
80%
70%
70%
60%
50%
40% 30%
30%
20%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di sagr ee
O pi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 30% of the employees are
satisfied with the welfare facilities that they offer and remaining 70% are not
satisfied.
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 39 98
DISAGREE 1 2
TOTAL 40 100
120%
98%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
2%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 98% of the employees are
satisfied with the job security that they offer and remaining 2% are not satisfied.
3.37. GRIEVANCE HANDLING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 95
DISAGREE 2 5
TOTAL 40 100
95%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
5%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 95% of the employees are
satisfied with the grievance handling that they offer and remaining 5% are not
satisfied.
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 39 98
DISAGREE 1 2
TOTAL 40 100
120%
98%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
2%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE
From the above table it was observed that only 98% of the employees are
satisfied with the performance appraisal that they offer and remaining 2% are not
satisfied.
3.39. TRAINING:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 36 90
DISAGREE 4 10
TOTAL 40 100
100% 90%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 10%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 90% of the employees are
satisfied with the training that they offer and remaining 10% are not
satisfied.
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 39 98
DISAGREE 1 2
TOTAL 40 100
120%
98%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
2%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 98% of the employees are
satisfied with the style of management and remaining 2% are not satisfied.
3.41. QUALITY POLICY:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 40 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 40 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the respondents are satisfied with
the quality policy
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 36 90
DISAGREE 4 10
TOTAL 40 100
100% 90%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 10%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 90% of the employees are
satisfied with the individual’s growth opportunities achieved and remaining 10%
are not satisfied.
3.43. GOALS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 38 95
DISAGREE 2 5
TOTAL 40 100
95%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
5%
10%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that only 95% of the employees are
satisfied with the goals and responsibilities and remaining 5% are not
satisfied.
CATEGORY NO OF RESPONDENTS %
AGREE 40 100
DISAGREE - -
TOTAL 40 100
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
A gr ee Di s agr ee
Opi ni on of R espondent s
INFERENCE:
From the above table it was observed that all the employees are satisfied
with the image of the organization
3.45. ROOTS PRECISION PRODUCT PRIVATE LIMITED
STAFF OPERATOR
PARTICULARS EXECUTIVES TOTAL
S S
WORKING CONDITIONS 100 63 85 83
RELATIONSHIP WITH
SUPERIORS 100 92 90 94
AND COLLEAGUES
MOTIVATION
100 87 95 94
ANDRECOGNITION
SALARY 100 83 85 89
WELFARE FACILITY
100 71 30 67
TRAINING:
100 100 90 97
• As of the staffs it is found that total of 91% of the sample size are satisfied
with the company. The least satisfied area among the staffs is the
working condition of the company.
• From the research conducted among the operators it is known that 70%
of the operators from the sample size are not satisfied with the welfare
facilities provided by the company. And a total of 89% percent of
operators are satisfied.
• It is also found that operators are less satisfied comparing to that of the
upper level employees.
5. SUGGESTIONS
• Proper working condition can be provided to the staffs by providing proper
and comfortable furniture and space within the work space.
• A fully fledged canteen facility may be provided which may also reduce
the time of the staffs in moving in and out of the organization. This would
motivate the employees
2. Age:
3. Sex:
4. Marital Status:
5. Dependants:
6. Designation:
7. Department:
9. Education qualification:
2. Age:
3. Sex:
4. Marital Status:
5. Dependants:
6. Designation:
7. Department:
9. Education qualification:
2. Age
3. Sex
4. Marital Status
5. Dependants
6. Designation
7. Department
9. Education qualification
WEBSITES:
www.hr.com
http://www.busreslab.com
http://www.confirmit.com