Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Memory Glyphs
Memory Glyphs
Radu Andriescu
Iustin Pant‚ a
Cristian Popescu
M E M O RY G LY P H S
3 Prose Poets from Romania
a r t wo r k b y C r i s t i a n O p r i ş
T W I S T E D S P O O N P R E S S • PRAGUE • 2009
Copyright © 1988, 2000, 2004 by Radu Andriescu
Copyright © 1991, 1992 by Iustin Panţa
Copyright © 1987, 1988, 1994 by Cristian Popescu
Translation and Introduction © 2009 by Adam J. Sorkin
Artwork © 2009 by Cristian Opriş
Copyright © 2009 by Twisted Spoon Press
isbn 978-80-86264-32-5
Cristian Popescu
Cornelia Street • 34
The Telephone at the Corner • 36
About Father and Us • 38
The Family Tree • 42
Poetry • 48
Anti-Portrait: A Psalm by Popescu • 50
The Circus I: A Psalm by Popescu • 52
The Circus II: A Psalm by Popescu • 54
Dance: A Psalm by Popescu • 56
Theater: A Psalm by Popescu • 59
Painting: A Psalm by Popescu • 61
The Happy Obituary • 63
The Big Obituary: A Psalm by Popescu • 66
Iustin Pant‚ a
A Visit • 71
Private Nelu • 73
The Rain Motif • 75
A Confession • 77
Magda • 79
Additional Sins • 81
Parting • 83
The Familiar • 84
When an Object Doesn’t Change Appearance or Place • 86
A Long While Before the Train Arrives She’s Thinking • 88
Empties • 89
The Telephone • 91
These Sleeping Pills • 93
Morning in the Town of Sinaia • 94
A Feminine Thought. A Feminine Thought? • 96
A Dog Bit My Leg • 97
A Short While Before the Train Arrives She’s Thinking • 98
She’s Right • 99
Baking in July’s Oven • 100
Getting Off the Train • 101
Umbrella • 102
Sour Cherries and Sandwiches • 103
The Cleaning Women • 104
The Aura of a Winner • 106
A Dialogue with a More or Less Imaginary Character • 107
How Much • 108
Radu Andriescu
Watermelon • 135
Ultima Thule • 136
The Stalinskaya® Bridges: E-Mails to My Friend Badge • 140
acknowledgments • 164
Tr a n s l a t o r ’s P r e f a c e
11
prose poetry flourish, as I know from the broad spectrum of
my translation activity. To name a few not in this volume,
whose work spans the past four decades, I’d like to mention
Ioana Ieronim, Ioan Es. Pop, Mihai Ursachi, O. Nimigean
(these last two are both mentioned in Andriescu’s poems),
Mircea Cărtărescu, Ruxandra Cesereanu, Saviana Stănescu,
Magda Cârneci, and Dan Sociu, none of whom is predom-
inantly a prose poet. Popescu, Panţa, and Andriescu
together make a very powerful case for the high quality
and variety of prose poetry in contemporary Romanian
literature.
12
after poem — is quirky and strangely moving. In his earlier
two books, he created a fantastic family romance based on
his own, utterly transformed biography. Underpinning his
work, the bittersweet myth of the Popescu family seems to
intimate about life an almost sentimental, on-the-edge-of-
cloying warmth utterly in contrast to the bleak, cold, dark
Bucharest of privation and despair. This is of course an
impossible realm, an ironic idyll, stylized and conventional
at moments as if out of folktales, but ultimately uncon-
ventional, a comic and reassuring elsewhere unreachable
during the worst and most repressive decade of the
Ceauşescu dictatorship.
Popescu himself saw his writings as the opposite of
the political parables and camouflaged between-the-lines
references of the “aesopism” of his generation of writers
who began to publish in the ’80s (“aesopism” is a term
Romanian as well as other East European and Russian
writers and critics commonly employed to characterize the
strategy of sly indirection and hidden meaning under com-
munist control). Rather than political or personal, I some-
times like to think that Popescu’s literary production
displays a mixed lyrical sensibility, the “urban pastoral.”
The poetry is pastoral not only in the traditional sense of
realizing complex attitudes disguised in a seeming sim-
plicity of life but also in the modern critical perspective
that defines the pastoral as being directed most of all at
13
sophisticated readers who expect polysemy as well as
social and cultural criticism. This “whole world of text”
of Popescu’s is not so much political-allegorical as melan-
cholic, satiric, wry, self-mocking, and surprising. The
mordancy, the often madcap linguistic humor that can be
seen in his slightly later “psalms” and other “essays,” as he
called the works collected in The Popescu Art, enliven the
book with a gently mocking spirit and a rollicking, exuber-
ant sense of the ridiculous. Many of these prose poems are
written in a poetic version of street dialect, a somewhat
edgy vernacular lingo yoking together slang phrases and
uneducated usages with patterns of repetition, internal
rhyme, and jaunty, clipped cadences.
Cristian Popescu spoke of The Popescu Art as comprising
“final variants” of poems penned earlier and in some
cases previously put into print in deformed or partially
suppressed texts. In a brief note appended as an afterword,
he wrote that it was really his first book in that his prior
publications had to make literary compromises because of
censorship; in The Popescu Art all of the choices were his
own and were literary ones. Popescu openly wondered
whether his poems in the book were “drawer poetry” hid-
den from the authorities or whether they made up a text of
inward “spiritual resistance.” It is clear that by this latter
term, he refers not just to the stubborn independence of
the human spirit under straitened circumstances but also
14
to a religious element that can be seen, for instance, in his
rather cajoling, buddy-buddy tone addressing God in the
poems he subtitles “psalms.”
Cristi — as he called himself in the poems, and as his
friends always still speak of him — suffered from schizo-
phrenia. He died a few months shy of thirty-six years old
from a heart attack that was induced by his medications for
schizophrenia and depression in potent mixture with vodka
drinking. The poems in Memory Glyphs span Popescu’s two
books of the late 1980s and The Popescu Art.
15
dreams spooling anew in the cinematography of con-
sciousness. His is a world of vibrant stasis, of appearances
given resonance by “our eventual disappearance,” of wait-
ing and non-arrival, the enigmatic and the unfulfilled. The
lucid details and reminiscences focused through the poet’s
lens get almost imperceptibly enlarged, and, despite a kind
of ambiguity or graininess, transformed into what the
reader perceives as the potentially illuminating, the
significant, the refined.
I remember a conversation with Iustin Panţa at a con-
ference in his Transylvanian city of Sibiu when I met him
there during the early 1990s. In a kind of riddle not unlike
the imagined open-ended games in quite a number of his
poems, he asked a loaded question, “Would you rather
have something or desire it?” Panţa’s reply: to desire it, for
desire imbues things with their value and importance. His
prose poems — a group of them in mixed forms, with
variable free-verse lines interrupted by a central prose
block that serves as a digression from the narrative and a
puzzling contrast — are indeed the expression of a belated,
enervated Romantic yearning, in which the self seems to
lack will, betokening an at-wit’s-end, fin-de-siècle state of
between-ness, a hypothetical semantics of the not-yet-
articulated.
Panţa was born in Bucharest, where, like Popescu, he
was educated, graduating from the Faculty of Electrical
16
Engineering in 1989. He worked for two months as an
engineer in Sibiu until the December 1989 revolution in
Romania changed everything. Panţa had already won
prizes for poetry from two literary reviews, and after a
five-month stint as a journalist, he joined the editorial staff
of the cultural magazine Euphorion, which he served as edi-
tor in chief and helped to make one of the most lively and
free-spirited in post-communist Romania. He produced
five books largely of prose poetry, and one, his last, of
essays, earning him a reputation as one of the most impor-
tant poets who emerged in the 1990s.
His debut volume was titled Blownup Objects (Obiecte
mişcate, 1991 — literally “Moved Objects,” but, Iustin told
me, his intended meaning was a secondary one, the process
of moving closer and closer, as in Michelangelo
Antonioni’s 1966 film, Blowup). The collection was fol-
lowed the next year by Simple Things or the Unstable
Equilibrium (Lucruri simple sau echilibrul instabil ), then
three years later by another book with a related title, The
Family and the Indifferent Equilibrium (Familia şi echilibrul
indiferent, 1995). The year before, Panţa had published The
Limits of Power or the Bribing the Witnesses, A Russian Novel
(Limitele puterii sau mituirea martorilor, un roman rusesc), a
narrative in verse done jointly in alternating sections, each
writer in his own characteristic style, with the eminent
poet Mircea Ivănescu, a mentor and important influence
17
on Panţa. Ivănescu is my collaborator for seven of the
Panţa translations in Memory Glyphs. Panţa’s 1998 book,
The Banquet: The Stable Equilibrium (Banchetul: Echilibrul
stabil, 1998), completed a tetralogy comprising his sole-
authored poetry collections.
Panţa’s former wife, now in the United States, has told
me that from the time he was in high school, he wanted to
be famous and talked of dying young. Sadly, having earned
the reputation as one of Romania’s most highly regarded
post-communist poets, he died in a car crash at the end of
September 2001. Panţa was thirty-six, roughly the same
age at which Popescu had died. A posthumous collection
came out in 2002 and a collected two-volume “definitive
edition,” Blownup Objects, the following year.
18
format in some of his more recent poems). We would meet
whenever I visited Iaşi where he teaches British and
American literature in the Faculty of Letters at the
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, which he had himself
attended. There, on the high terrace reached by “the
wrought-iron winding stairs” to the rooftop of his house, or
one story below in front of his computer, we’d get to work,
Radu improvising a rough draft with comments and expla-
nations along the way, I scribbling it down or typing,
although lately he sends me attachments with new poems
and rough translations he has worked on. He also gladly
cooperated with me in the translation of six of Panţa’s
poems.
Mirror Against the Wall won the Poesis Prize for a
debut volume. It was followed by The Back Door (Uşa din
spate, 1994) and The End of the Road, the Beginning of the
Journey (Sfîrşitul drumului, începutul călătoriei, 1998),
awarded the poetry prize of the Iaşi Writers Association.
Both Some Friends and Me (Euşi cîţiva prieteni, 2000) and
The Stalinskaya Bridges (Punţile Stalinskaya, 2004) featured
illustrations by Radu Andriescu’s close friend, Dan
Ursachi, who has done the covers for all of his collections
(Ursachi is nicknamed “Badge” in Radu’s poems, including
two on the pages that follow, “The Stalinskaya® Bridges”
and its e-prelude). Andriescu’s new collection, The
Metallurgical Forest (Pădurea metalurgică, 2008), is in part a
19
reference to the industrial zone of the meta-Iaşi of his
mythic landscape.
Andriescu’s poetry is a complex topography of lan-
guage. His references range from the everyday world of
streets and cars, dogs, friends, and sensory details to his
own thoughts, remembrances, and fantasies, occasionally in
elaborate projections, to a sampling of the virtual universe
of today’s media and digitized culture, with touches of the
language of theory behind it. He is a poet who relishes lists
and odd facts, a thick texture of images and phrases, a few
on the edge of the absurd. The poetic voice is supple,
intense, genial, and dryly ironic, often with a sort of incan-
tatory music of ample sentences and repetitive patterns,
other times relatively plain and comically self-deprecating.
Andriescu’s work is more varied than Popescu’s and
Panţa’s. He generally writes in lines rather than in prose-
poetry glyphs, and in fact, a couple of his poems in this
book have alternate versions in verse format. The textual
medium that is poetry is out in the open — as the poetic
voice confesses in “Postscript to Mururoa,” “I wrote about
things around here, in my life, as if they were far distant,
and beautiful. I played, I disguised things.” In Andriescu’s
self-referential, almost parodic (yet fundamentally serious)
vein, his persona gains authenticity, an impression of per-
sonal honesty, though everywhere proclaiming its fiction-
ality, giving rise to a strange lyrical sense of wonder, a kind
20
of beauty and strength. His meditative excursions spiral off
the space of the page, then back to the facts, the ideas, the
words, now liberated.
Every prose poem is in its doubleness an experiment in
form, and in Radu Andriescu’s sensibility the results surprise,
move, amuse, and give thoughtful pause to the reader,
sometimes in quick succession. All three poets in this vol-
ume have “played” and “disguised things” in their different
ways, Popescu with his zany world of skewed biography
and linguistic energy, Panţa in his serious and sometimes
melancholic state of psychic irresolution and reverie, and
Andriescu in his verbal flights toward the ethereal, his
paradoxically mundane otherworldliness.
• • •
21
Last but not least, I want to express gratitude to the
Romanian Cultural Institute, Bucharest, for individual
translator support that in part aided my work on these
poems, and for the grant to Twisted Spoon Press under the
Institute’s Translation and Publication Support Program,
without which this book could not have been published.
I would be remiss in not acknowledging the skill and
talent of my co-translators. As for who translated which
poems, it should be clear that Bogdan Ştefănescu, a long-
time collaborator of mine on other poets as well and an
associate professor of English at the University of
Bucharest, worked with me on all of Cristian Popescu’s
poems, and Radu Andriescu, of course, was the active co-
translator of the English versions of his own poems. The
poems by Iustin Panţa involved three different collaborators,
as follows: Bogdan Ştefănescu, for thirteen poems (“A
Visit,” “Private Nelu,” “Magda,” “Parting,” “The
Familiar,” “A Long While Before the Train Arrives She’s
Thinking,” “A Feminine Thought. A Feminine
Thought?,” “A Short While Before the Train Arrives She’s
Thinking,” “Baking in July’s Oven,” “Getting off the
Train,” “Sour Cherries and Sandwiches,” “The Cleaning
Women,” “A Dialogue with a More or Less Imaginary
Character”); Mircea Ivănescu, for seven poems (“The Rain
Motif,” “A Confession,” “Additional Sins,” “Morning in
the Town of Sinaia,” “A Dog Bit My Leg,” “She’s Right,”
22
“How Much”); and Radu Andriescu, for six poems (“When
an Object Doesn’t Change Appearance or Place,”
“Empties,” “The Telephone,” “These Sleeping Pills,”
“Umbrella,” “The Aura of a Winner”). This book would
not have been what it is without any of them.
Adam J. Sorkin
23
Cristian Popescu
27
it in books. No use. That’s why I’m leaving him my last
dream.
You have to understand him. You mustn’t take him seri-
ously. If he tells you I keep a plastic bag of cigarette butts
from when I was young, cigarette butts with my lipstick
stains, and when one of his girls dumps him I secretly give
them to him so he can kiss them and get over it, just con-
sider that he’s lonely. We don’t know what to do with him.
He won’t utter a word for days on end. I always told him,
“My boy, don’t give yourself such big worries. So what if I
wash and iron for you, that you remain dependent on me,
that I sacrifice my life. I know what happens after you die.
As soon as you get there, you start growing young. But not
in any old way. The very same years your children grow
old — they make you grow younger. It’s all in the family.
When you’re decrepit, I’ll be beautiful and alluring again,
and your father will once more love me, like in the old
days. Stop thinking that you don’t bring home enough
money. That’s the way it is. It can’t be helped.”
28
a doctor to cut me open and stuff a prosthesis in my belly.
I couldn’t live without him. But little by little I got accus-
tomed to it. I started liking it. In the evening, when I had to
give him to suck, I dressed in my wedding dress, put on my
pearl necklace, turned the lights low, powdered and rouged
my breasts. I comforted myself thinking that one day
someone will curse him and tell him to stick himself back
into his mother. I was young and he was my very first baby.
That’s the way it is. When he was two months, I drew hair
on his armpits, on his chin, wherever he had none. I drew
with an eyebrow pencil. He would simply lie there quietly
and gurgle. He couldn’t take his eyes off me.
29
we kiss you, we congratulate you with many happy returns
of the day, and you become quiet. I know you will finally
turn out to be a great poet. So what if women don’t love you
and your hand has tremors when you lift the spoon to your
mouth? What if I have to remind you of your sister’s name
when you want to call her around the house? What if you
still are with one foot in your mother while others already
have one foot in the grave? Don’t you mind it at all, my
boy. You’ll show them. They’ll bury you. With a big serv-
ice, tears, all the usual stuff. But after three or four days
I’ll ask them to let me see you one more time, to take you
out of there for a bit. And the coffin will be empty. And
inside, on its walls: graffiti, smut like in public toilets.
Don’t you mind it at all, my boy. That’s the way it is.
You’re not made for this world.
30
T h e C o m m e m o r a t i o n o f G r a n d m o t h e r ’s D e a t h
31
Now, for the commemoration, in the living room
Grandfather placed a fir tree which he decorated with
Grandmother’s glasses, her lipstick, her rings, a glove, and
her last pair of silk stockings filled with tinsel. As soon as
she heard about it, my grandmother picked up the first
bloom of her youth, prepared a sunrise at the seaside and a
few loving words, but she found herself in the dream of an
adolescent boy, our neighbor’s son, who forgot all about it
when he woke up.
At the table people do love to talk on and on about all
sorts of things. “Have you heard, dearie? The old man
made himself a plastic mask of his face from when he was
twenty, and he goes about the house all day long wearing
it; he takes it off only before going to bed. Some say that
he’s so feebleminded he remembers only what he looked
like when he was twenty and met his wife and that without
this mask he can’t recognize himself in the mirror. I believe
he’s scared, dearie, you know, he just wants to disremember.
He’s in a bad way!”
They’ll bring a big, deep tureen to the table, full of
earth, with the roasted turkey, most appetizing. Half
buried.
“And well, what about his nephew? He’s got corns on his
temples. And have you heard the latest: he’s the greatest
specialist we have in collecting dirt under his nails.”
“Well, his grandmother’s outclassed him. She’s collect-
ing it under her eyelids now.”
32
I put my pajamas on, turned out the light, plumped the
pillow beneath my head, and went to sleep. Grandmother
had an easy enough time finding her way into my dream
and we’ve been chatting, like this, quietly, for something like
a month already.
33
Cornelia Street
34
told me they all had little metal plaques reading No. 7
sewn on their shoulders, and that I was going to live there
for several years. But then I was going to have to pack up
and take my leave. Cornelia walked me to the corner and
stared after me for a long, long time. Whenever I happen to
pass by again, the stones in her pavement tremble quietly
beneath my step.
35
T h e Te l e p h o n e a t t h e C o r n e r
36
your home number, your wife will answer: she’ll ask you
where you’ve been all this while, she’ll say she won’t warm
your supper for you, she’ll tell you she’s leaving you.
37
About Father and Us
Mother is daubing rust on her lips, and slowly she waves her
fan to waft moonlight throughout the room so she can
remember better. I run quickly, quickly, from one side of the
room to the other, and I bang myself as hard as I can
against the walls in order to make them toll like a bell.
38
Radu Andriescu
111
extensive forests of brown lichens, black rot, oozing bacte-
ria, a strange plenitude of flying, creeping, crawling, hopping
creatures that, against their will — without their ever having
dreamed of such a fright in the blackest nightmare of their
blackest night — experience the apotheosis of verticality.
First he traced limits.
He traced them in the boom and hullabaloo. Blaring a
fortissimo tattoo, the massed brass bands of the entire
world are no more than the echoed whisper of that rumble.
After many years of refining the limits, never fully pleased
with the results, out of the sounds that remained he could
stand only a nostalgic sigh.
When he arrived almost at the end, there wasn’t much
left but silence.
He traced them in the light. Millions of filaments and
luminescent gases couldn’t come close to defining the bril-
liance of those limits. Compared to the extremities of light,
the joy of a Christmas tree is profound in its sorrow. A
dense light, a rock. The whole somehow merges with its
limits. The center gives the impression of being the
bounds. A quicksand of light. He sought to refine the light.
He installed prisms in the guise of conclusions. Fir-tree
curtains draped metaphor mountains. He dispatched dawn
farther and farther away, ever closer to the core of day. He
retreated deep into his burrow. He gathered darkness
about him like a made-to-measure jacket. All this until the
112
light, being itself an abstraction, a point, eventually had
disappeared. Just a speck of fluff, a fleck of dandruff.
He ventured a limit of signification. At the boundaries
of the territory, he scattered a bestiary and a great sack of
blocks. Or logs. With sundry disparate signs. A roiling,
boiling turmoil started up in the front yard. A hard freeze,
a deep resentment emerged from the bottom of the sack
when not even a single exclamation remained among the
punctuation marks. Nothing could ever take one’s breath
away. He tossed the signs together again. At the borders, as
everywhere else, there was nothing left but frost.
In many other ways, he erred. The flying, creeping,
crawling, hopping creatures, the oak forests and lichen
forests, the stags and spiders, the eggs, the deathwatch
beetles singing ceaselessly in the heart of the wood, a loud
chorale of clouds consumed by numerous reincarnations
— he made mistakes about them all. Ramparts of smoke,
soldiers of paper, legions of smells, they passed by the
boundaries of his front yard. He always seemed discontent.
Morose. So that from one side, from another, from any
possible side or even every distant horizon, troubles came to
him and doubled. And the punishment (terrestrial? celes-
tial?) was never to grow old, never to know limits.
He traced an axis from the stove, its smoke and its
mass: the smoke rose toward heaven, then the mass drew
him down again.
113
He was sitting — Turkish-style — near the axis, listen-
ing to the endless mourning of the choir of deathwatch
beetles hidden in the very heart of the wood. Limited par-
asites crunching in tunnels. He would take the tunneled,
resounding piece of wood and throw it to the core of the
axis. The grunts of the deathwatch beetles, of stags as
small as lice, the forests of mycelium, all, all of them, the
walking, flying, creeping, crawling, hopping creatures,
bawling and caterwauling, rising through the chimney
stack, now red, now black.
And this is how he sits today, the head of a pin at the
center of a circle the bounds of which he cannot see and to
which he cannot go, near an axis neither end of which he’ll
ever know.
114
T h e Te r r a c e
115
During the summer I used to cover it with a round table-
cloth made to fit, a cloth with fresh green leaves, hiding
the puckered veneer. So I sit with my feet propped on the
parapet — in fact I press my soles against the cold, rough
surface after I take off my socks, I try to rock back on the
legs of my chair, a risky thing to do with such a fragile
plastic object, and I look at the houses and the hills all
around me. Below, in the valley, on one side, there are the
lights of apartment buildings. Above them, even late at
night, you can discern the bellies of the hills. People usu-
ally speak of the back of the hills, I don’t know why, as if
the entire world were haunted by hunchbacks on whose
crooked spine grass grows, or here and there a monastery
— Galata a little to my left as I sit on the terrace, and
Cetăţuia somewhat further away in the same direction —
next the tv tower. It’s grotesque. In fact, the image with
the bellies isn’t much better. The tits? The breasts? The
throbbing bosom? The thighs of the hills? On my right, a
little higher on the hill — smack dab on the nipple of the hill
— there’s the apartment building, the row of buildings on
Babeş Street from the ’50s, with their flying tiles, their
mansard roofs harboring lofts, their half collapsed chim-
neys, the fat grapes of crows, their oddly distorted tv
aerials. With fires and loud weddings enlivened by brass
bands. With a couple of kids and lots of old people. In
front of me, the black silhouettes of the trees, pear and
116
cherry, and at the end of the street, a grove of fir trees.
These fir trees are a wonderful sight. Somewhere around the
corner, on Turcu Street, there is a glaring amber street-
light behind the firs. The jaundiced light lends a density
to the houses and trees nearby. Even in winter those trees
are the best view in the neighborhood, though I have to
look at them from the window under the terrace — I rarely
climb to the terrace when it’s cold. Besides, there isn’t
much to do there when the Russian frost bites. In winter
there’s also the smoke from the closest houses, the snow,
well, it’s beautiful, you feel like you’re frozen to the spot gaz-
ing at them forever and you’ll never do anything else. It’s
dangerous. So intense a beauty paralyzes you. It’s even bet-
ter than in summer. Beauty and cold: clearly the onset of
death under anesthesia, like the death of a fish thrown on the
ice next to the fishing hole. Only, the fish fails really to
appreciate the landscape, that’s the difference. No, there’s
another, a huge one: it is not the fish’s choice to freeze on
the ice. The landscape has something perverse and hyp-
notic about it. It’s the same hypnotic quality that makes me
lean back in my chair in summer, almost every night, even
when the mosquitoes are fierce and the heat magnifies the
stench rising from Lola’s kennel. I let myself be mesmerized
at leisure, and I pretend to be thinking. I imagine that
ideas could cross my mind if I sit like so, alone, in the
midst of a silence quite remarkable in a city, for maybe ten,
117
fifteen minutes. Sometimes even a little longer, when
strange somethings start to roar through my brain. I
wouldn’t call these things ideas, or images, or scripts, or
apothegms, or concepts, I wouldn’t call them anything of the
kind because, hypnotized as I am, my thoughts an unravel-
ing skein, being like a sort of demented German, a renegade
of order, a pockmark on the smooth crystalline surface of the
idea, the roar couldn’t be described as other than a thing.
There are those who, it’s true, call it poetry. Though this is
a condescending and euphemistic way — so to speak — of
naming this thing. Let’s not be unfair, though: this roar
could become poetry, but it would need a drop of that
which cannot be named or touched but lies somewhere
within us and breaks to the surface when the auguries are
favorable. In the end, too intricate an explanation, but it
happens to be the one I have.
118