Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part2d Bios
Part2d Bios
2. Objective
2.1 What is the aim of the proposed trial release of the genetically modied organism (GMO)? What are the benets of this approach compared with other possible methods, especially those not involving planned release? The current vaccine for Hepatitis B is the same cloned viral protein, but delivery is in a pharmacological package designed for injection. Storage and hygiene of injected vaccines have been problematic in rural areas of developing countries where refrigeration and supplies are not readily available. In addition, injections cause signicant trauma to children and adults. Packaging the vaccine protein in an edible fruit is a convenient, cost-effective, and humane way of ensuring that adequate doses are delivered to all people in high-risk areas. 2.2 If the trial release is successful, do you intend to propose a general release of the GMO? Yes If so: 2.2.1 When do you propose that the general release would take place? Once medical clearance is obtainedapproximately three years.
Case Study 3
89
2.2.2 Where do you propose that the general release would take place? Worldwide in banana growing areas. 2.2.3 By whom do you propose that the GMO would be released? An international health organization. 2.3 Do you intend to market the GMO as a product in this country? Yes.
was shot into banana tissue using a helium gun. Plantlets were regenerated from transformed cells of eight banana varieties. Stable transformants were selected over ten generations of plants regenerated in tissue culture.
Pb34 = fruit specic promoter from tomato HepB CP62 =major epitope coat protein from Hepatitis B virus strain 4589 tB14 = terminator from tomato polygalacturonase gene 2x35S = two copies of the CaMV 35S promoter RR = glyphosate herbicide tolerance gene nos = nopaline synthase terminator from Agrobacterium
90
3.4 What is the frequency of reversion, i.e., loss of genetic modication? None. 3.5 How do you verify that you have the desired GMO? Hybridization and herbicide tolerance. 3.6 What methods will you use to test for batch-to-batch consistency? Elisa testing. 3.7 What is the expected survival time of the GMO under conditions likely to be found in the proposed release area(s) and surrounding environment(s)? The plants will survive for three to ten years in cultivated elds. 3.8 Describe normal dispersal mechanisms of the species and characterize the capability of the GMO to disperse from the release area. Bananas are cultivated vegetatively. New stock is obtained through tissue culture to optimize virus disease control in the crop. 3.9 If, at any stage in the future, biosafety regulators need to ascertain whether the GMO in a eld is the same as that specied here, what means are available? Hybridization and herbicide tolerance. 3.10 Provide a protocol and materials to enable detection of foreign gene(s) in surrounding microbial, plant, or animal life. Protocols attached.
Case Study 3
91
Tropical Agriculture Institute Reservoir Administration Sheds Bonani Suburb and School
4 R6
Trial site
N Dam
would, at the very worst, wash the plants down to the dam, but this is highly unlikely because no such oods have been recorded in the area. After the trial the plants will be removed and burnt. 4.2 What potential hazardous or deleterious effects resulting from the trial release of the GMO can be postulated? The vaccine bananas are not toxic even when consumed at a high rate. 4.3 Have similar releases of similar GMOs been made previously, either within or outside the country? No. 4.4 Have similar requests or applications for the release of this particular GMO been made previously? No. 4.5 Is there any evidence that the inserted genetic trait is transferable to other organisms in the release site and surrounding environment? The banana owers are mostly sterile, but will be bagged to prevent pollen release into the environment. 4.6 What data are available to suggest that the introduced genetic trait has no deleterious effect in the long term upon the species into which it has been introduced or allied species or any other organisms or the environment in general? The Hepatitis B epitope protein is being used already as a vaccine, and its lack of toxicity was established before it was approved for medical use.
92
4.7 Is the GMO intended to modify the characteristics or abundance of other species? No. 4.8 What experimental results or information exist to show the probable consequences (positive and negative) of the release of such a modied organism, including impacts on: 4.8.1 Human, animal, or plant health? The protein will increase resistance to Hepatitis B in consumers able to invoke an immune response. 4.8.2 Agricultural production? None. 4.8.3 Target and nontarget organisms in the area? None. 4.8.4 The general ecology, environmental quality, and pollution in the area? None. 4.8.5 The genetic resources (e.g., susceptibility of economically important species to herbicides, pesticides, etc.)? None. 4.9 Will the trial release have any unlikely but possible impacts? No. 4.10 What will be the consequences if the organism remains in the environment beyond the planned period? None. 4.11 Has a trial release been carried out in the country of origin of the GMO? No. 4.12 Provide a draft copy of a press release informing the public of the trial or general release of the GMO. Attached.
Case Study 3
93
5.2 Will the subjects carry live vaccine organisms at the end of the trial? If so: 5.2.1 Will they be likely to disseminate the live vaccine organisms to the general population? N/A 5.3 On the basis of data obtained in contained experiments (please supply), what effects are expected when the vaccine organism interacts with target and nontarget species in the test area and surrounding environment? N/A 5.4 What is the existing evidence regarding level and duration of immunity produced in the target species? These data are being collected. 5.5 What challenge or other tests using virulent eld strains are to be carried out on vaccinated animals? N/A 5.6 Is there likelihood that the host vaccine organism would be used in other human or animal vaccines? Yes. 5.7 Would the use of this vaccine preclude the future use of the host vaccine organism for immunization purposes? No.
94
6.6 Are any members of the genus of modied plants known to be weeds? No. 6.7 Can the genetic trait be transmitted by means other than by normal reproduction? No. 6.8 Does the imparted characteristic have the potential to add or subtract substances from the soil (e.g., nitrogen)? No. 6.9 Has the modied plant been shown to be nontoxic to animals and humans? Yes. 6.10 Could any toxic products concentrate in the natural or human food chain? No. 6.11 With regard to the pollination characteristics of the species, do wild populations of the species, or related species with which it can interbreed, exist in the vicinity of the eld trial or agricultural site? No. 6.12 With regard to the pollination characteristics of the plant, is it likely that the novel genetic material will enter a pre-existing gene pool? Provide information on the pollinators specic to the crop and the measures to be taken to prevent pollen spread to unmodied plants. No. The owers are mostly sterile, but will be bagged at the onset of ower development and kept bagged until harvest. 6.13 Should the imparted characteristic (e.g., insect, herbicide, or disease resistance) escape into a wild population, would it have the potential to affect the distribution and abundance of that population? No. 6.14 Would there be any consequent problems with respect to: 6.14.1 Agriculture? No. 6.14.2 The environment? No.
Case Study 3
95
6.14.3 Disease control? The GM crop is designed to combat viral disease in humans. 6.15 If there is any possibility of 6.12 and/or 6.13 occurring, has any attempt been made to minimize the risk (e.g., by imparting male sterility)? No. 6.16 Could the imparted characteristic (either in the cultivated population or in a wild population) provoke a genetic response in populations of other species (e.g., increase the resistance of an insect population to an insecticide)? No.
96