Government of Orissa Works Department Orissa State Road Project
Government of Orissa Works Department Orissa State Road Project
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND DETAILED PROJECT PREPARATION FOR PHASE-I ROADS FINAL DETAIL ENGINEERING REPORT BERHAMPUR TAPTAPANI 41 Kms [OSRP CW Y1 P03]
(APRIL - 2007)
MAIN REPORT
C O N S U L T I N G ENGINEERS GROUP LTD.
E-12, Moji Colony, Malviya Nagar Jaipur-17 Tel: +91-141-2520899,2521899,2520556 Fax: 2521348, E-mail: [email protected]
211.50KM NH-23
50
GUMLA
50
205.614 KM NH-6
KO LK
A AT
Ext n.
SUNDARGARH
NH
49 50
-75
-2 15
189.900KM
11 49 19
NH
161.0KM NH-200
28
NH -20 0
00.00KM NH-200
H AR
JHARSUGUDA
NH
11
-6
MAYURBHANJ 250.00KM
-5 NH
19
52.372KM NH-60
NH -2 3
53 49
10A
352.0KM NH-6
NH
-6
156.436KM NH-200
NH-6
566.00KM 0.00KM NH-6 88.00KM NH-6 47.00KM NH-6 156.436KM NH-200 478.410KM NH-6
337.300KM NH-23
121.0KM NH-215
11 49 53 19
NH -6
421.0KM NH-6
NH-6
319.60KM NH-201
15
SAMBALPUR
DEOGARH
83.400KM NH-23
NH
KEONJHAR
-215
Boula
BALASORE
268.386KM NH-42
24
00
53
11 55
53
R AI
PU R
438.430KM NH-217
N H-
42
ANGUL
NH-201
SUBARNAPUR
15 41
NH-200
20
0/0KM NH-215
BHADRAK
35
NH -5
RAIPUR
B A R A G A R H
-2
NH-23
130.00KM NH-42
63
56
62
DHENKANAL
NH -42
JAJPUR
9A
42
BOUDH
240.0KM
428.02KM NH-200
BOLANGIR
42
23 65 23 9A 41 1 65
9A
NUAPADA
KENDRAPARA
NH
43
NH-217
165.0KM
CUTTACK
18
-5
41 1
17
-2
6A
NH
KANDHAMAL
7A
7 37
KHURDA
60
NAYAGARH
13
JAGATSINGHPUR
43
77.400KM NH-5A
16 6A 6 6
5
13
33 52 40
PURI
H -5
116.0KM
44
138.00KM
KALAHANDI
-2 01
44 6 5
GANJAM
5 30 33
NH
NH
39
-2 17
29
30 30 30
NAWARANGAPUR
NH
36
67.00KM
45 46 17 44 39 44 34 29 17
31 32 31
17
32
26
RAYAGADA
45 46 4
GAJAPATI
29
NH -43
365.40KM NH-43
44
0.000 KM NH-201
48
KORAPUT
51
22 34 4
25
NH
VI ZI
25
47
A N AG AR A M
-4 3
473.267KM NH-43
MALKANGIRI
25
-203
61.521KM NH-203
NH -20
3 Ext.
57
KO
LK AT A
RA IG
EXP .WAY
NH 00 -2
NH -2 24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 INTRODUCTION GENERAL PROJECT BACKGROUND PRESENT ASSIGNMENT PROJECT ROADS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE COMPOSITION OF REPORT
2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9
SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION GENERAL TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL INVESTIGATIONS HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS INVESTIGATION FOR BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES PAVEMENT INVESTIGATIONS ROAD SAFETY REVIEW SURVEYING UTILITY SERVICES TRAFFIC SURVEY DETAIL DESIGN ROAD ALIGNMENT GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS DESIGN SOFTWARES UTILITY SERVICES WAY SIDE AMENITIES DETAIL DRAWINGS PAVEMENT DESIGN GENERAL IRC METHOD DESIGN METHODOLOGY DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND PROTECTION WORKS GENERAL EXISTING SCENARIO DETAILED DESIGN DRAINAGE ON HIGH EMBANKMENT LONGITUDINAL GRADIENT DETAIL DESIGN OF STRUCTURES GENERAL PROPOSED BRIDGES WIDTH DESIGN PHILOSOPHY DESIGN LOADS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS DETAIL DESIGN PROPOSED CULVERTS REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-1
7 7.1 7.2 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9 9.1 10 10.1 11 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5
ROAD SAFETY MEASURES GENERAL ROAD SAFETY MEASURES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION PLANS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY SOCIAL ASSESSMENT AND RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN GENERAL
7-1 7-1
9-1
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN GENERAL 10-1 COST ESTIMATIONS GENERAL METHODOLOGY BILL OF QUANTITIES UNIT RATES COST ESTIMATES
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Table 1.2 Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 Table 2.5 Table 2.6 Table 2.7 Table 2.8 Table 2.9 Table 2.10 Table 2.11 Table 2.12 Table 2.13 Table 2.14 Table 2.15 Table 2.16 Table 2.17 Table 2.17 Table 2.18 Table 2.19 Table 2.20 Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 3.3 Table 3.4 Table 3.5 Table 3.6 Table 3.7 Table 3.8 Table 3.9 Table 3.10 Table 3.11 Table 4.1 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Table 4.4 Table 5.1 Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Table 6.3a Table 6.4 Table 7.1 Table 7.2 Table 7.3 Table 7.4 Table 7.5 Table 7.6 List of the project Road List of Civil Construction Package List of TBM Soil Investigation Data of Existing Subgrade Sources of Construction material Sub Soil exploration Test Locations Recommendations from Subsoil Investigations Vertical Clearance Hydraulic Parameters Inventory and condition of Existing Bridges Summary of Existing Bridges Inventory and Existing Culverts Summary of Existing Culverts Pavement Condition Pavement Composition Roughness Value in IRI Characteristic Deflections List of Junctions AADT and PCU Summary of AADT and PCU Design VDF Design MSA Projected Traffic List of IRC Publications Terrain Classifications as per IRC Design Speed for different Terrain Classes Recommended Road Land Width Minimum recommended Sight Distances Absolute Minimum Radius Radius Beyond Which Super Elevation not Required Extra Widening at Curve Gradients for Different Terrain Minimum length of Vertical Curve Side Slope in Embankment Design CBR for Berhampur-Taptapani corridor Crust details for Reconstruction for the Bhawanipatna Khariar as per IRC method Crust details for Reconstruction/widening for the BerhampurTaptapani as per Method Crust details for Overlay for the Berhampur-Taptapani as per IRC method (IRC:81-1997) List of Built-up Sections List of IRC Codes Proposed Bridges Proposed Culverts Summary of proposed culverts Rehabilitation of Minor Bridges Serviceability Criteria List of Junctions Schedule of Bus Bays Location of Guard Posts Schedule of Road Humps schedule of Pedestrian Crossing 1-2 1-3 2-2 2-5 2-9 2-13 2-13 2-17 2-17 2-20 2-20 2-25 2-27 2-29 2-33 2-34 2-35 2-38 2-41 2-41 2-42 2-42 2-42 3-2 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-5 3-5 3-6 3-7 3-7 3-8 3-8 4-3 4-4 4-4 4-6 5-3 6-1 6-2 6-6 6-11 6-12 7-2 7-3 7-8 7-10 7-11 7-13
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
i.
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5 Figure 2.6 Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 Figure 5.4 Cracking (%) Variation along the stretch Raveling (%) Variation along the stretch Potholing (%) Variation along the stretch Patching (%) Variation along the stretch Cross Junction T-Junction Road Section at Built-up location Detailed Urban Drain Section Road Section at Rural location Detailed Rural Drain Section 2-31 2-31 2-32 2-32 2-37 2-37 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-5
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-1
ABBREVATIONS
ABBREVIATIONS AADT AASHTO ADT BBD BC BI BOQ CBR CEG CV CVD DBM DFS DLC DTM EA EIA EMP EIRR ESMF ESAL GDP GNP GOO GOI GSB HDM-4 HFL HS IRC IRI LSF MDR MoSRT&H MOU MSA MTPA Annual Average Daily Traffic American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Average Daily Traffic Bankelman Beam Deflection Bituminious Concrete Bump Integrator-Roughness (mm/km) Bill of Quantities California Bearing Ratio Consulting Engineerws Group Ltd. Commercial Vechiles Commercial Vehicles per Day Dense Bituminous Macadam Differential Free Swell Index Dry Lean Concrete Digital Terrain Model Environment Assessment Environment Impact Assessment Environment Management Plan Economic Internal Rate of Return Environment and Social Management Framework Equivalent Standard Axle Load Gross Domestic Product Gross National Product Government of Orissa Government of India Granular Sub Base Highway Development and Management Model-4 High Flood Level Hard Shoulder Indian Roads Congress International Roughness Index Load Safety Factor Major District Road Ministry of Shipping, Road Transportation and Highways Memoranda Of Understanding Million Standard Axles Million Tonnes Per Annum
i
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
NGO NDT NH NHAI NMT NNP NPV NSDP O-D OSRP OWD PCC PCNSDP PCU PIA PIU PMC SA SDBC SF SH SOS TOR TRRL VDF VOC WB WBM WMM
Non-Government Organization Non-Destructive Test National Highway National Highway Authority of India Non-Motorized Traffic Net National Product Net Present value Net State Domestic Product Origin and Destination Orissa State Roads Project Orissa Works Department Project Coordinating Consultants Per Capita Net State Domestic Product Passenger Car Unit Project Influence Area Project Implementation Unit Pre Mix Carpet Social Assessment Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete Seasonal Factor State Highway Strategic Option Study Terms of Reference Transport and Road Research Laboratory (UK) Vehicle Damage Factor Vehicle Operating Costs World Bank Water Bound Macadam Wet Mix Macadam
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The Orissa Works Department (OWD) aims to upgrade and widen its vital arterial State roads to 2-lanes to accelerate the overall economic growth as the Orissa has untapped immense potential of development in mining, industry, tourism, ports sectors. The Orissa State has planned to arrange funds from World Bank for developing about 825 km of roads under Phase-I limiting to the amount of US $250million spread over 5 years. The OWD has engaged M/s CEG Limited for providing the consultancy services for preparation of the Feasibility and Detail Project Report for 825km of roads under Phase-I. This Project also includes network analysis of 3700 km (3955 as per data collected) State Highways to arrive at selection of 1600 km for feasibility studies for subsequent Phases. The Consultancy services were commenced from 6th December 2005. The present submission is the Final Detailed Engineering Report for Berhampur to Taptapani Road (km 0/0 to km 41/0 of SH-17) under Phase-I. This is a part of Berhampur - Bangi Junction Rayagada Corridor. The continuous interaction and joint field inspections of the consultant and PIU during the course of field surveys/ investigations and subsequent verification of actual designs of highway alignments and bridges in the field, has enabled to produce a practical Detailed Engineering Report. This report has been proposed incorporating the comments and discussions of PIU. Reply to PIU comments are appended in Annexure-A enclosed. The earlier submissions of Inception Report, Economic Viability Report, Social Screening and Environmental Screening Reports and Feasibility Report have already been accepted. The structure of this report is in accordance with reporting requirements as per agreement. Detailed Survey and Investigations were carried out for the following: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. 6. Topographical Survey Geotechnical and Material Investigations Hydraulic and Hydrological investigation Investigation for Bridges and Structures Pavement Investigations Road Safety Review Surveying Utility Services
2.
3.
4.
5.
Topographic survey was conducted with the help of Total Station. Longitudinal section levels were taken at every 25 m interval along the centre line of the existing carriageway. Cross sections were taken at every 50 m interval covering full extent of survey corridor. Longitudinal and cross sections survey for major/minor streams was also carried out as per the requirements. Bench Mark Pillars were erected at an interval of 1 km along the route.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7.
The sub-grade soil samples were collected from each km along the existing alignment. The detailed investigations for existing road include both field and laboratory testing. Test pits were excavated at the shoulder adjacent to pavement edge at interval of 1km. Low to high expansive soils of CL-CH group are found in various Sections of SH-17 i.e. km 3/0, 6/0, 9/0, 16/0 - 21/0, 28/0 30/0, and 37/0 39/0. In these stretches either replace the soil of high expansive properties by importing good soil from borrow area or treat the soil of low to medium expansive soils. To identify potential sources of material for construction, the survey and investigation for different construction materials were carried out in respect of their likely sources and the availability and suitability of various materials. Relevant laboratory tests were conducted on representative samples as per requirement. Table 1: Sources of Construction Material S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Material Granular Sub base Coarse Aggregate/ Stone Sand / Fine Aggregate Morrum Cement Water Stone No. of Sources Identified 4 6 3 4 2 3 6
8.
9.
Geotechnical investigation for bridges and other structures were carried out to determine the appropriate foundation type and its load carrying capacity. Table 2: Recommendations from Subsoil Investigations
Location 1 2 3 Chainage 1/915 11/270 29/500 Type of foundation Minimum Depth of Foundation 3.0m from bed level/13m from Open/Pile Ground Level Open 3.0m from bed level Pile 13m from Ground level
10. 11.
Hydrological investigations were carried out to determine hydraulic adequacy of the structures. None of the Bridge found inadequate. A detailed inventory and condition survey was carried out for structures. There are total 10 bridges, 1 of them is major and remaining 9 are minor bridges. All bridges and culverts were inspected for their present condition and verified jointly with PIU Engineers. The NDT (Rebound hammer and Ultrasonic pulse velocity) tests were conducted for bridges at chainage 11/660 and 17/900 to study the structural soundness of the structures. The recommendations are as follows.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
ii
Well foundation Good, Nothing to do Reconstruction due to Open foundation narrow in width and poor condition
The total numbers of culverts are 142 in a road length of 41 kms i.e from km 0/0 to 41/0. Details of the Existing and proposed culverts are available in Chapter 2. Following table gives the details of existing culverts. Table 4: Summary of existing Culverts Type of Culvert Pipe Slab Stone slab Choked Arch Total 12. Nos. 41 51 24 15 11 142
Investigations were carried out on existing pavement condition to determine the most technically sound and economically feasible pavements design. The investigations include: i. ii. iii. iv. Visual Inspection Survey Pavement Composition. Roughness Survey Benkelman Beam Deflection Survey
13.
The existing Project Road has sharp horizontal curves and insufficient vertical design standard, which do not provide adequate overtaking sight and stopping distance even for 50 kmph thereby making the accidents more frequent. Existing road junctions are not properly designed. These deficiencies have been properly attended in the design.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
iii
14.
The traffic surveys were conducted to determine classified traffic volumes in terms of Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), directional split, hourly variation, trip length pattern, travel pattern of goods and passenger traffic, commodity flow and axle loads. Traffic Volume Count Survey was conducted at two locations; one VC-7 at km 0/600 near Berhampur and other VC-8 at 22/500 near Digapahandi. Axle load survey was carried out near Berhampur, designated as AL-05 and conducted using Portable Load Pads, developed in Indian Institute Technology, Kharagpur, having platform size 550mm X 700mm X 30mm (weight 30 kg) with digital load indicator. Following tables gives the summary of traffic surveys carried out.
Table 5: Summary of AADT and PCU Count Stn. VC-7 VC-8 Description AADT PCU AADT PCU Total Motorised Vehicle 4149 4285 1432 1987 Total Comm. Vehicle 808 2277 2398 2540 Total Non Motorised Vehicle 4003 2362 493 1345 Total Vehicle 8152 6647 1190 687
Table 6: Design VDF Station Road Section Recommended values of VDF for 2-Axle Truck 3-Axle Truck LCV 2008-13 2013-28 2008-13 2013-28
0.18 3.71 3.5 3.71 3.5
Table 7: Design MSA Location VC-7 VC-8 Design Year 2028 2028 Table 8: Projected Traffic Year 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028 AADT VC-7 9309 11245 13950 17548 22058 VC-8 4165 5266 6797 8828 11364 VC-7 7743 9941 13119 17529 23275 PCU VC-8 3805 5034 6791 9203 12316 Design MSA 14.40 8.65
15.
The existing road is a single lane carriageway road with horizontal and vertical geometric average to poor. Geometric Design Standards as per IRC: 73-1980 Geometric Design Standards for Rural (Non-urban) Highway has been generally followed. MX Road, AutoCAD and Autodesk Land Development Desktop softwares have been used for the designing and drafting. The Project road has been designed as a two-lane carriageway with hard shoulders. The width of two lanes has been taken as
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
iv
7.0m with 2.5m wide hard shoulders on either side. Total roadway width has been taken as 12.00 m. In built up areas, paved shoulder of 1.5m widths shall be provided making total roadway width of 10m. Beyond this, covered drains shall be provided which will be used as walkway. 16. Plan and profile drawings has been prepared separately at scale of 1:2000 horizontal and 1:200 vertical. It shows all existing plan features, toe line of highway embankment, proposed right of way limits, drainage structure locations, existing ground profile, proposed finished profile, intersection layouts, typical cross sections of the main alignment, etc. Bus-bays and Truck Lay-bays have been provided at appropriate locations and specified in schedule of drawings. Designs for new pavement and overlays are worked out in accordance with Indian Standards. The CBR is taken at an interval of l Km along the stretch. If the CBR is less than 4%, then new construction is adopted. If the CBR is more than 4% but the deflection value is too high, reconstruction is adopted otherwise overlay is adopted. Crust details for new construction and reconstruction has been given in Chapter 4. Unlined open trapezoidal drains for the rural sections and RCC Box covered drains for the Built-up Sections have been used. Out of the existing 10 bridges, the bridge at location 29/300 is major and remaining 9 are minor. Bridge at location 11/270 is in poor condition and narrow in width, it is recommended for re-construction. The bridge at location 1/915 is slightly realigned and will be widened and the bridge at location 29/500 is realigned and narrow in width is recommended for reconstruction. Culverts in good condition and adequate size, which meets the requirements of plan and profile in respect of highway geometry and levels, have been retained. These have been widened to make full formation width if narrow. The culverts, which need replacement due to poor condition or inadequate size, have already been indicated in Chapter-02. The culverts, which cannot be used due to change in horizontal alignment or change in vertical alignment, also need replacement along new alignment. A summary of retained, widening and new culverts are given in table below. Type of Culvert Culverts Retained Culverts Widened Pipe extension Slab widening Culverts Replaced New Single Pipe New Double Pipe New Single Box of 1/22/0 New Single Box of 1/22/1 New Single Box of 1/23/0 New Single Box of 1/33/0 New Single Box of 1/43/0 New Single Box of 1/44/0 Total Nos. Nil 5 12 51 9 24 1 20 12 2 1 137
17.
18. 19.
20.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
21.
To increase the traffic safety and to reduce traffic accidents, every component of the highways and its users has been given equal importance. Road geometric components have been designed to meet the State Highway standards as specified in the IRC: 731980. The traffic control devices, which are used to reduce accidents and improve flow conditions, road markings and road signs, have been used as per IRC standards. In general, the specifications laid down in Specifications for Road and Bridge Works Fourth Revision - by MoSRT&H shall be followed. The detailed specifications have been given in Bidding Document prepared separately for each civil construction package. Construction scheme and traffic management system during construction have been described in Chaper 8. All necessary safety measures shall be adopted for safety of moving traffic and working persons engaged in the construction zone. Detail costs have been worked out for the different items of road works and structures. Estimated total cost of this package is Rs 954.70 millions which includes engineering cost as Rs 753.478 millions. Estimated cost for provisional items, social, environmental and utility shifting costs as Rs 63.20 millions.
22.
23.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
vi
CHAPTER - 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
GENERAL The fast growing Orissa State is one of the major state of India with population 36.8 million persons and ranks 11th with population share 3.58% -Census 2001 and having geographical area 0.155 million sq km with 9th rank in India. The 480 km coastline with ports also makes Orissa a distinguished State. The Orissa is not only very rich in minerals deposits but also has surplus power and water. The countrys over 90% Chromites and Nickel deposits are in Orissa beside over 50% Bauxite, 30% of Manganese, Iron ore and coal. The Orissa is a favoured destination of investment. The road transport is a dominant mode for movement of goods and passengers and need based upgrading of existing road network has been envisioned by the state. This chapter describes the background of the project, present project roads with contract packages and composition of the Detailed Engineering Report of the contract package Behrampur Taptapani (SH-17) (km 0/0 to km 41/0) section which is a part of Behrampur JK pur (Rayagada) 193 km project corridor. The report presents detailed design of road and bridges with cost for upgrading existing road to two lane. Proposals and further details for improving the existing road to two lanes are detailed in the succeeding chapters.
1.2
PROJECT BACKGROUND The Orissa Works Department (OWD) had conducted a Strategic Option Study of State Roads, in (1995-1997) which identified 2347 km of State Roads out of 4600 km of State Highways and Major District Roads for improvement based on traffic volume, carriageway width, and pavement condition. The Government of Orissa contracted a Project Coordinating Consultant (PCC) for feasibility study of 2347 km to identify 700 km in two phases for techno-economic appraisal with detailed project preparation to meet World Bank norms. The PCC had completed detailed engineering design for widening and strengthening for a length of 198 km which was later declared National Highway (NH-224) and as a result of techno-economic studies in this project, 1200 km were prioritized for a four year periodic maintenance programme and but the project was not implemented. The OWD intends to upgrade and widen its vital arterial State roads to 2-lanes to accelerate the overall economic growth of the State having immense untapped potential in mining, industry, tourism, and ports. The Orissa State has planned to avail loan from World Bank for developing about 825 km of roads under Phase-I limiting to the loan amount of US $250million spread over five years. This Project also includes network analysis of remaining 3700 km (3900 as per data collected) State Highways based techno-economic approach with an aim to arrive at selection of 1600 km of project routes for feasibility studies for subsequent Phases.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-1
1.3
PRESENT ASSIGNMNET The OWD has engaged M/s CEG Limited for providing the Consultancy Services for preparation of the Feasibility and Detail Project Report for 825 km of roads under Phase-I. The assignment also includes network analysis of 3700 km (3900 as per data collected) State Highways to arrive at selection of 1600 km for feasibility studies for subsequent Phases. The Consultancy services were commenced from 6th December 2005. The Feasibility Study report for 825 km of roads has been completed and accepted by the OWD. The Draft Network Analysis report and Draft Detailed Engineering for Year- I roads already been submitted Present submission is Final Detailed Engineering Report of Behrampur - Taptapani (km 0/0 to km 41/0).
1.4
PROJECT ROADS UNDER PHASE-I The Project, with total length 835 km, mostly existing State Highways, is comprising of five corridors which are passing through 14 districts (out of total 30 districts) having 51.7% area and 53.1% population of the State. These corridors provide vital connections with faster mobility within State and out side State for communication, mining, industry, tourism, ports etc. The list of the Project Road Corridors is given in Table 1.1 along with the road designation and total length in km. The Project Roads consist of existing State Highways and MDR. The Project Roads locations are shown in Map 1.1. Table 1.1: List of the Project Road
Sl. No. Name of Road Jagatpur - Kendrapada - Chandbali Bhadrak 1 a) Jagatpur - Kendrapada - Chadbali b) Chandbali Bhadrak Bhadrak - Anandapur - Karanjia - Jashipur 2 a) Bhadrak Anandapur b) Anandapur - Karanjia c) Karanjia - Jashipur Berhampur - Raygada 3 a) Berhampur - Bangi Jn. b) Bangi Jn. - JK Pur Khariar - Bhawanipatna - Muniguda - Kerada a) Khariar Bhawanipatna 4 b) Bhawanipatna - Muniguda c) Muniguda - J.K.Pur d) Raygada - Kerada Banarpal Daspalla and Bhanjanagar - Aska 5 a) Banarpal - Daspalla b) Bhanjanagar - Aska MDR-18,19 SH-65 SH-7 TOTAL 89 39 832 1-2 SH-16 SH-6 SH-5 MDR-48B 70 68 50 24 1.Anugul 2.Cuttack 3.Dhenkanal 4.Nyagarh 5.Ganjam SH-17 SH4 151 52 1.Bolangir 2.Kalahandi 3.Nuapada 4.Rayagada SH-53 SH-53 SH-49 57 65 15 1.Gajapati 2.Ganjam 3.Rayagada SH-9A SH-9 99 53 1.Bhadrak 2.Keonjhar 3.Mayurbhanj SH/MDR Length (km) District Crossed 1.Bhadrak 2.Cuttack 3.Kendrapara
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1.4.1
CONTRACT PACKAGES FOR THE PROJECT ROADS In consultation with the OWD, the project roads have been divided into 11 (eleven) contract packages for construction and supervision, as shown in Table 1.2. The packaging is based on design, construction and administrative jurisdictions to facilitate effective construction and supervision. The packages with least environmental and social issues have been proposed in construction year-1 and remaining road sections in construction year-2 contracts. Table 1.2: List of Contract Packages for Construction of the Project Roads
Jagatpur-Kendrapada-Chandbali SH-9A Chandbali Bhadrak Bhadrak Anandpur SH-9 SH-53 SH-53 SH49 SH-4 MDR-48B SH-5 SH-6 SH-16 SH-7 MDR-18&19 SH-65 Year-2 Total
Rayagada Kereda J.K.Pur Muniguda Muniguda-Bhawanipatna Bhawanipatna-Khariar Aska - Bhanjnagar Banarpal - Dapalla
9 10 11
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-3
1.5
CONTRACT PACKAGE- BEHRAMPUR-TAPTAPANI (KM 0/0 TO KM 41/0) The present submission is the Final Detailed Engineering Report for Berhampur to Taptapani Road (km 0/0 to km 41/0 of SH-17) which is a part of the project corridor Behrampur - JK Pur (Rayagada)-193 km. The road starts from Kolkata - Chennai 4 lane highway (NH-5) Chainage 19/00. The road starts from km 0/0 to km 41/0 of SH17. The Berhampur is a district headquarters of Ganjam, is major town and a business hub in the south west coast and very close to fast growing Gopalpur port. The Berhampur to Taptapani section caters the needs of nearest town Digapahandi, is an important road junction. The road traverses mostly through plains and has mostly flat gradients with good geometry. Geometric of the road are generally mild; nevertheless improvement of the congested reaches is required. Roadside drains are rare, where provided in such areas, are generally choked or is non-functional resulting in water logging. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.6 m to 5.5 m with 1.0 m to 1.5m earthen shoulders on both sides. Riding quality all along the road is from good to poor. There are total 10 existing bridges, one of them is major and remaining 9 are minor bridges and total number of existing culverts are 142. About 25% of the road length passes through built-up area. The improvement works involves development of existing road to two lanes with 20 years design period.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-4
Map 1.1
10
12
11
10
50
SUNDARGARH
10
Panposh Rourkela
2
49 50
Sundargarh
8
28
11 49
19
JHARSUGUDA
Kanaktora Brajarajnagar
10
Jharsuguda
Bonai
11 49 10A
Karanjia
53 19
Bhojpur Deogarh
Keonjhargarh
Jamankira
11 49 53 19 19
Balasore
10
SAMBALPUR
DEOGARH
Baragarh
3
B A R A G A R H
55
Anandapur
Bonth
7
11 53
Bhadrak
9 35 85
ANGUL
3
SUBARNAPUR
15
Talcher Kamakhyanagar
63
20
BHADRAK
9
Jajpur
56 9
Sonepur
41
Banrapal
Bhuban
Odapada
Boudh
62
Nuapada
42
Angul
DHENKANAL
JAJPUR
Aul
Chandbali
9A
Bolangir
BOUDH
Dhenkanal
23
BOLANGIR
42
Hindola
9A 65
NUAPADA
41 42 1 7
23
Phulabani
1 18 Gania
Jagatpur
Narasinghpur 65
Patamundai
Salepur 9A
12
Nuapatna
Cuttack
Kendrapara
CUTTACK
Banki
43 12
KENDRAPARA
12
Daspalla Khariar
41 1 6A 7 37 16 Pokharibandha 6A 6 6 7A
Jagatsinghpur
Paradwip Port
BHUBANESWAR
60
NAYAGARH
Nayagarh
JAGATSINGHPUR
43
Khurda
KHURDA
13
Chatikuda
KANDHAMAL
Bhanjanagar
33
13
Junagarh
52 40
Bhawanipatna
44
PURI
Puri
KALAHANDI
44
GANJAM
5 30 33
39
Umarkot
Muniguda
6 5 Kutragarh
7 7
30 30 30
NAWARANGAPUR
45
Aska Adba
17 34
Bissamcuttack
46
Taptapani
29 17 29
36
31 32 31
PROJECT LOCATION
LEGENDS
PHASE-I ROAD (DPRs)
44 39 44 45
RAYAGADA J K Pur
4
Gumuda
46 Ramanguda
Digapahandi GAJAPATI
29
17
32
Chhatrapur
26
Nawarangapur
Rayagada
44
Berhampur
Bangi Jn.
4
Taptapani
PHASE-II & III ROAD (Network Analysis)
(41/00)
SH 17
SH 36
Gunupur
48
Kerada
51 4 22 34 4
KORAPUT
Koraput
Na r ay
Paralakhemundi
am ari
25
Pu d
25
Salur
47
SH 17
La njia
SH 32
Malkangiri
MALKANGIRI
Dig
Project Location
ap
Berhampur
(0/00)
SH 29 NOT TO SCALE
25
Motu
Not to Scale
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-5
1.6
COMPOSITION OF REPORT The Detailing Engineering Report consists of total ten volumes as follows: Main Report Highway Drawings: Plan, Profile and Schedules. Standard Drawings for Highway Design Report of Bridge. Design Report of Culverts Hydrology Report Drawings of Bridges and Culverts Detail Cost Estimates Electrical Utility Shifting Plan Utility Shifting Plan (Telephone, OFC and Hand Pump)
The Draft Detailed Engineering Report for this project road have already been submitted vide this office letter no. CEG/OR/001/2007/318 dated Jan 15th 2007. The Geo-technical Investigation Report and Material Report for this project road have already been submitted vide this office letter no. CEG/OR/001/2006/243 dated 3rd Oct 2006 and CEG/OR/001/2006/207 dated 3rd Aug 2006 respectively. The main report contains nine Chapters as described below and is in accordance with the requirements of TOR for this project. Reply to PIU comments are appended in Annexure- A. Chapter 1: Introduces and provides the background to the OSRP. The study area is defined and the corridors selected for the Phase 1 are identified. The Brief description on chapterisation is also provided. Chapter 2: Outlines the various field survey and investigation such as carried out their methodology adopted, findings etc. The various field survey includes, Topographical survey, Geotechnical and Material Investigations, Hydraulic and Hydrological investigation, Investigation for Bridges and Structures, Pavement Investigations, Surveying Utility Services, Road Safety Review, Traffic survey. Chapter 3: Describes the detail design of road geometries, Standards adopted, Realignments, way side amenities etc. Chapter 4: Presents the various aspects of pavement design. The design methodology, calculation of MSA and CBR has been described. The detail designs of overlay and crust for new section has also been discussed in this chapter.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-6
Chapter 5: Discuss the detail design of Drainage system and protection works, like longitudinal drains, Embankment Protection and River Training works. Chapter 6: Presents the various aspects of Structures design. The design methodology, design standards adopted and details of structure design for the road. Chapter 7: Outlines the Detail Design Road Safety Measures, Traffic Control and Other Facilities, which includes, Road Intersections, Road Furniture, Pavement Marking, Road Lighting etc. Chapter 8: Describes the Specifications and Construction Plans for all aspects of the works, based on current and acceptable international standards and work methods for projects of this type. Safety and traffic management plans as well as construction phasing / sequencing to be implemented during construction to ensure minimum hindrance / interruption to traffic flow and road safety. Chapter 9: Social Assessment and Resettlement Action Plan (The report will be submitted in separately volume). Chapter 10: Environmental Action and Environmental Management Plan. (The report will be submitted in separately volume). Chapter 11: Discuss cost estimates for each of the items included in the scope of work. It covers cost of basic inputs - materials, equipment, labor, together with overheads, profit, etc. including rate analysis, quantities, and total estimated cost.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-7
Comments raised during time to time discussion with PIU. In built up area at Chainage 0/600 (Berhampur to Digapahadi) and at Chainage 22/500 (Digapahandi to Mohana) the carriageway has been modified from 7m+2x1.5 paved shoulder to 7m+2x1.5 paved shoulder+2x0.25m concrete saucer drain. The Crash Barriers are replaced by Guard Posts. Concrete grade for structures have been modified The effect of cost of surcharge soil has been removed in stability check and stress calculations. Seismic forces have been considered as per IRC:6-2000 for the bridges for which seismic force is applicable. Dirt wall Floor protection works for bridges have been revised and necessary modifications have been made. Where DFS is more than 50%, proper treatment has been given.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
1-8
CHAPTER 2
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-1
2-2
corridor. The features include ROW, existing carriageway, Km stones, buildings, structures, monuments, places of worship, railway lines, streams, rivers, canals, culverts, trees, plantations, utility services such as electric power lines, electric poles, telephone posts and telephone lines and cross roads etc. The recorded survey data were later downloaded to computer and converted to text files as well as AutoCAD drawings using appropriate software. 2.3 GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL INVESTIGATIONS
2.3.1 General
This para covers the details of tests and investigations carried out for evaluating the characteristics of the sub-grade along the project road Berhampur to Taptapani on SH17 (km 0/000 to km 41/000) to establish the basis for the design of various elements of the highway including pavement and sub-grade, embankment and structures. In order to widening, strengthening and reconstruction of the roads and bridges, various kinds of materials shall be required. To identify potential sources of material for construction, the survey of following materials have been carried out in the months of Jan 06 Feb 06 in respect of their likely sources and the availability and suitability of various materials. This chapter includes detailed investigation of materials and their potential sources with the relevant laboratory tests conducted on representative samples as per IRC: SP -19. The main tasks carried out for soil and material investigations include: i. ii. Investigation for road for sub-grade soil below existing pavement for strengthening, widening and reconstruction design. Investigation for construction materials including identification and inspection of potential sources of construction material and extraction sites, testing and evaluating of construction materials for suitability for project road construction. Geotechnical investigation for bridges and other structures.
iii.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-3
v. vi.
Field density and In-situ moisture content (IS:2720, Part XXIX & Part II) Free Swell Index (IS: 2720, Part XXXX)
The results of the above field and laboratory investigations for various test pits are reported in Table 2.2 of Material Report Part I, reproduced here also in Table 2.2.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-4
DFS
1 1/0 2/0 3/0 4/0 5/0 6/0 7/0 8/0 9/0 10/0 11/0 12/0 13/0 14/0
2 3 Clayey sand with 13.6 silt & gravel Clayey sand with 8.6 silt & gravel Silty clay with 4.175 sand Clayey sand with 0.47 silt Clayey sand with 0.3 silt Sandy Clay with 0.23 Silt Silty sand Silty sand with clay Sandy Clay with Silt Clayey sand with silt Silty sand with clay Clayey sand with silt Clayey sand with silt Silty sand with clay 0.435 0 1.105 3.715 3.265 0.52 2.115 0.6
16 28 18 20 11 25 38 27 26 10 -
17.195 14.625 5.285 1.525 0.735 2.7 4.685 3.105 7.32 6.62 6.105 7.07 4.7 2.11 11.095
23.435 36.985 37.585 14.76 25.55 25.17 23.5 14.24 22.38 22.95 47.11 14.79 40.36 35.095 12.095 31.92 31.37 37.095 56.73 29.35 38.65 65.24 35.365 36.31 46.71 44.775
45.935 36.615
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-5
DFS
1 15/0 16/0 17/0 18/0 19/0 20/0 21/0 22/0 23/0 24/0 25/0 26/0 27/0 28/0
2 Silty sand with clay Silty clay with sand Silty clay with sand &gravel Silty clay with sand Silty clay with sand Silty clay with sand Silty clay with sand Clayey sand with silt Clayey sand with gravel& silt Silty sand Silty sand Clayey sand with silt Silty sand Silty clay with sand
16 27 35 53 35 56 35 57 21 20 18 10
12.575 10.965 1.005 0 0.255 0.625 3.105 21.19 2.925 5.025 0 4.18 0.6 4.15 2.95 0.56 0.555
12.315 19.855 24.885 9.65 13.585 12.52 0.41 14.02 1.8 14.825 26.24 27.585 31.98 25.665 11.077 18.81 26.25 25.55 28.1 26.01 30.16
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-6
DFS
1 29/0 30/0 31/0 32/0 33/0 34/0 35/0 36/0 37/0 38/0 39/0 40/0 41/0
2 Silty clay with sand Silty clay with sand Silty sand Silty sand Clayey sand with silt Silty sand Silty sand Silty sand
16 10 10 58 69 49 21.5
30.235 56.025 42.145 32.645 38.72 30.35 44.53 44.62 43.615 37.915 43.475 33.815 32.555 33.18 49.87 55.52 50.935 40.2 39.045
Silty clay with 17.25 sand &gravel Silty clay with 7.95 sand &gravel Silty clay with 15.435 sand &gravel Clay sand with 12.48 sand & gravel Clay sand with 7.48 sand & gravel
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-7
Discussion of Results The soils in this stretch mainly classify in the group of SC / SM / CI /CL/SM-SC/CH and it is described as Silty Sand with Clay /Silty Sand / Silty clay with Sand/ Silty Clay. CL/CI/CH soil is low to high plastic and cohesive having CBR values (Soaked) ranging from 2.9% to 15 %. The maximum dry density at O.M.C. of the existing subgrade soil of CL/CI/CH group varies between 1.78 gm/cm3 to 1.89 gm/cm3. In these sections PI value ranges from 17 to 25.0. The P.I. value is Nil in the case of Silty Sand soil of SM group. While the Clayey Sand with Silt (SC) soil is little plastic. In some kilometers, there are Expansive soils found with low to high degree of expansion. The treatments for such soils are discussed in the following Paragraph Expansive Soils and their Treatment Low to high expansive soils of CL-CH group are found in various Sections of SH-17 i.e. km 3/0, 6/0, 9/0, 16/0 - 21/0, 28/0 30/0, and 37/0 39/0. Though, there are very few kilometers in such a long stretch of road section, it is always preferable either to replace the soil of high expansive properties or to treat the soil of low to medium expansive soils as below. Thus to reduce the expansive properties of soil, firstly the expansive soil should be compacted slightly 1-2 % wet of the O.M.C and provide a buffer layer of nonexpansive cohesive soil cushion of 0.6 1.0m thickness. It prevents the ingress of water in the underlying expansive soil layer, counteracts swelling and secondly even if the underlying expansive soil heaves, the movement will be more uniform and consequently more tolerable or it is recommended to either replace the soil by importing good soil from borrow area in the case of highly expansive soils. However where provision of non-expansive buffer layer is not economically feasible, a blanket course of suitable material and thickness as discussed below must be provided. A blanket course of at least 225 mm thickness and composed of coarse/ medium sand or non-plastic Moorum having PI less than 5 should be provided on expansive soil subgrade as a sub-base to serve as an effective intrusion barrier. The blanket course should extend over the entire formation width together with measures for efficient drainage of the pavement section. Improvement of drainage can significantly reduce the magnitude of seasonal heaves.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-8
Table 2.3: Sources of Construction Material S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2.3.3.1 Material Granular Sub base Coarse Aggregate/ Stone Sand / Fine Aggregate Morrum Cement Water Stone No. of Sources Identified 4 6 3 4 2 3 6
Sub-grade In this stretch, there was no soil available in borrow areas .The materials which can be used in sub-grade from borrow areas are sand and Moorum only. The representative samples were collected from each of the quarries and the laboratory tests were conducted to determine the suitability for construction. Identified Location of Sand Quarries: i. ii. i. ii. iii. iv. Ballipada @ km 9/400 Nuagada @ km 32/0 Fadiripalli @ km 7/0 Antei km @ 7/0 Ramchandrapur @ km 25/0 Podamiri Nanda Quarry @ km 38/0
The Tests results are tabulated in Table. 2.3 and 6.2 of Material Report Part-I and their suitability for subgrade was found out on the basis of these results. Discussion of Test results Sand in this stretch mainly found in km 9/400 (Ballipada River), and 32/0 (Nuagada River) which classified in the group of SM described as Silty Sand. The Silty Sand (SM) soil is non plastic and cohesion less .The Maximum Dry Density at O.M.C. of the existing subgrade soil of SM group varies between 1.82 gm/cm3 to 2.03 gm/cm3. The sand from river borrow area is available in much quantity, also another alternative is either to use Moorrum mixed with sand, as subgrade material, which is abundantly available in this stretch. The various test results of samples collected from the Borrow areas are given in Table 2.3 & 6.2 (Refer Material Report Part I). 2.3.3.2 Granular Sub-base Along the Project corridor, six quarries were identified. The representative samples were collected from each of the quarries and the laboratory tests were conducted to determine the suitability for construction.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-9
Identified Location of Quarries: i. ii. iii. iv. i. ii. iii. iv. Antei @ km 7/0 Ballipada @ km 9/400 Ramchandrapur @ km 25/0 Padaniri @ km 38/0 Gradation (MoSRT&H) Atterbergs Limits (IS: 2720 (Part 5) 2001) Modified Proctor Test (IS: 2720 (Part 8) 2001) California Bearing Ratio (CBR, Soaked) (IS : 2720 (Part 16) 2002)
The Tests results are tabulated in Table. 4.1 and 4.2 of Material Report Part-I and their suitability for different type of works was found out on the basis of these results. Discussion of Test results The sub base material should have minimum CBR of 30% for traffic exceeding 2 MSA and 20% for traffic upto 2 MSA. The samples of Granular Sub Base materials were collected from various quarries along the Berhampur to Taptapani road. From the tests results it is clearly evident that in Berhampur to Taptapani road section, only two number of quarries named Antei (km 7/0), Ballipada ( km 9/400 ) have suitable GSB material having Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index value within the prescribe limit of MoSRT&H . For rest of quarries in which Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index is more than 25 and 6.0 respectively, blending of coarse grained sandy soil is suggested to lower down their Liquid limit and Plasticity Index within the prescribed limit. Quarries having CBR values less than 30% also need blending, and for rest of quarries blending of sand in required proportion is done and their revised tests results have been tabulated in Table 4.2 (Refer Material Report-Part I) Therefore it shall be ensured prior to actual execution that the material to be used in the sub-base satisfies the requirements of CBR and other physical requirements. Coarse Aggregate: 2.3.3.3 Coarse Aggregate/Stone Along the road section of SH-17, Berhampur to Taptapani, six quarries were found. The representative samples were collected from each of the quarries and the laboratory tests were conducted to determine the suitability for construction. Identified Location of Quarries: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. Fadiripalli @ km 7 / 0 Antei @ km 7 / 0 RamchandraPur @ km 25/0 Chudanga Pur @ km 25/0 Rajpur-Narendrapur @ km 40/0 Dasipur @ km 42/0
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-10
Laboratory Tests Conducted: i. ii. iii. iv. v. Gradation (IS: 2386 (Part 1) 2002 and MoSRT&H) Aggregate Impact Value (IS: 2386 (Part 4) 2002) Specific Gravity& Water Absorption (IS: 2386 (Part 3) 2002) Combined Flakiness & Elongation Index (IS: 2386 (Part 1) 2002) Stripping Value (IS : 6241 1971 Reaffirmed 1998)
The Tests results are tabulated in Table 5.1 of Material Report Part-I and their suitability for different type of works is found out on the basis of these results. Discussion of Test Results The samples collected from various queries were tested in the laboratory. All the samples comply with the physical requirement of MoSRT&H specifications. Their water absorption value ranges from 0.32 % to 1.02% and the combined Flakiness and Elongation Indices also comply with the physical requirements as per MoSRT&H specifications. The Impact values are in the range from 9% to 27% which is also well within the prescribed limits as per MoSRTH. The aggregates from quarries do not conform exactly to the grading specified in the specification of MoSRT&H. Therefore; the blending as per the requirement should be done prior to mixing at plant. The stripping values of most of aggregate do not fulfill the requirements. For the aggregates whose stripping values do not fulfill the requirement then anti stripping agent should be used during execution as per the requirement. The tests results are given in Table 5.1. Refer Material Report Part I) Materials from quarries / crusher (aggregate) given in test results Table 5.1 (Refer Material Report Part I) are suitable for WMM., Bituminous work and other construction works in accordance to MoSRT&H specifications. 2.3.3.4 Sand / Fine Aggregate Sand/Fine Aggregate will be required for concrete work. Along the road section of SH-17, Berhampur to Taptapani, three quarries were found. The representative samples were collected from each of the quarries and the laboratory tests were conducted to determine the suitability for construction. Identified Location of Quarries: i. ii. iii. i. ii. iii. iv. Ballipada River Sand @ km 9/0 Gadagada River sand @ km 29/0 Nuagada, River sand @ km 32/0 Gradation (IS: 383 2002) Silt content and Fineness Modulus (IS: 383 2002) Specific Gravity (IS: 2720 (Part 3) 2002) Deleterious content (IS: 2386 (Part 1) and IS: 383 2002)
The Tests results are tabulated in Table 6.1 (Refer Material Report Part-I) and their suitability for different type of works is found out on the basis of these results.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-11
Discussion of Test results Sand sources are generally suitable for fine aggregate materials in Bituminous works and Concrete works but would require the removal of deleterious materials and Clay / Silt contents. From the Table 6.1 and 6.2 (Refer Material Report Part-I), it is evident that the Sand of Ballipada River is lies in zone I, and for rest of the sources the sand lies in Zone II, though test results shows that sand samples from other sources are also suitable for subgrade material as well as RCC / Masonry work 2.3.3.5 Cement / Concrete Cement Cement is made by branded manufacturers in the regions. In this region, Konark Slag Cement and Lafarge Cement are mainly in use for construction purpose. As cement is manufactured by branded companies and its testing is done on lot to lot basis regularly. Therefore, samples of these two types of cement were tested for the physical properties. The test results are tabulated in Table 7.1 and 7.2 (Refer Material Report-Part I). Concrete The concrete work shall consist of furnishing and placing structural concrete and incidental construction with these specifications and in conformity with the lines, grades and dimensions, as shown on the drawings or as directed by the Engineer. It is recommended that as the gradation and other physical properties of materials used in mix design vary site to site. Therefore fresh mix designs of the required grade should always be conducted before the construction starts and it should be checked at regular intervals during the phase of construction itself. 2.3.3.6 Water Water used for mixing and curing shall be clean and free from injurious amounts of oils, acids, alkalis, organic materials or other substances that may be deleterious to concrete or steel. Potable water is generally considered satisfactory for mixing concrete. Mixing and curing with seawater shall not permit. One sample of water from each road section of Berhampur to Taptapani (SH-17) was collected and tested for the suitability for use in construction as per IS: 456-( ). For test results refer Table 8.1 & 8.2 of Material Report-Part I. From the given test results it is evident that these water samples are suitable for the construction purpose.
2-12
relevant laboratory testing of the samples are essential to arrive at required parameter for designing of foundations. 2.3.4.1 Sub soil exploration Test Locations The Sub Soil explorations were carried out at locations as indicated in following table. Table 2.4: Sub Soil exploration Test Locations
Location 1 2 3 Chainage 1/915 11/270 29/500 Nallah Ambagada Nallah Kanchi Nallah Khajuri Nallah
Detailed information about the sub soil exploration investigations, characteristics of site, field investigation, laboratory tests, analysis, test results, bore hole details and conclusions refer Geo-Technical report of Bherampur to Bangi Jn (SH-17). 2.3.4.2 Recommendations from Investigations: Table 2.5: Recommendations from Subsoil Investigations
Location 1 2 3 Chainage 1/915 11/270 29/500 Type of foundation Minimum Depth of Foundation Recommended for Widening of Existing Bridge Open 3.0m from bed level Pile 13.5m from Ground level
2.4
HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS The Highway network in a project area crosses a number of rivers/ tributaries / streams / nallahs with small, medium or large catchment and therefore for design of bridges and other structures, hydrological parameters of these structures are essentially required. The design discharge has been calculated for a maximum 50-year return period as per IRC 5-1985, clause 103.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-13
2.4.1.2
Rational Formula The rational formula for assessment of peak discharge from project catchment takes into account rainfall, runoff under various circumstances, time of concentration and critical intensity of rainfall. The formulas used are as under. One hour rainfall (Io), I o =
F T +1 T 1+1
0.385
Discharge Q = 0.028PAI C
Where, tc = Time of concentration i.e. time taken by runoff from farthest point on the periphery of catchment (hrs) I o = One hour rainfall in cm. Ic = Critical intensity of rainfall in cm per hour P = Coefficient of runoff for the catchment characteristics (Ref.Table4.1, P-13, I.R.C. SP: 13-2004) A = Catchment area in hectare Q = Maximum discharge in cumecs
L = Distance from the critical point to the structure (Length of path) in Km
H = The difference in level from the critical point to the structure in metre F = Maximum rain fall in mm T = Duration of storm in hours f = A fraction of maximum point intensity at the centre of he storm and related with the catchment area (Determined from Figure 4.2, Page-14, I.R.C.: SP: 13-2004.) In the present study, storm rainfall and storm duration data of 50 Year return period have been utilized from design flood hydrograph of near by project sites, developed on the basis of Hydro-meteorological studies as per Flood estimation reports of Mahanadi and Upper eastern coast sub-zones.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-14
2.4.1.3
Manning's Formula
In this method cross sectional area and longitudinal slope of the stream is used to determine the velocity of flow and design discharge. Discharge has been calculated at three locations i.e. one near the proposed bridge site, one at u/s and one at d/s of the proposed bridge site.
V= 1 23 2 R S n
1
Q = AV
Where V = Velocity of flow n = Mannings constant R = A/P = Hydraulic mean radius A = Cross sectional area of flow P = Wetted perimeter S = Longitudinal slope of stream Q = Discharge
2.4.1.4
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-15
2.4.1.5
The linear water way/regime width (W) of a bridge across a purely alluvial stream in regime state as per IRC-SP-13.
W = 4.8Q Where,
Db 2 = 1.34 K sf
dm = Weighted mean diameter of the particles in mm Maximum scour depth for individual foundations without any floor protection works is given as For pier = 2 * d sf For abutments = 1.27 * d sf
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-16
2.5
2.5.1 General
The total stretch of Berhampur to Taptapani is 41 km on SH-17. The detailed study has been undertaken for the culverts & bridges. The detailed study consists of: i. ii. iii. iv. Inventory of culverts & bridges. Condition assessment of existing culverts & bridges. Additional cross drainage structures as per detailed site investigation. Construction of new bridge on same alignment because,
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-17
a. b. v. vi.
Existing bridge is narrow and dilapidated. Hydrological study and local data indicates bridge getting overtopped frequently.
Possibility of widening the bridges to the required width if structural, hydrological considerations would so permit. Retaining the existing bridges with a. b. Touchup repairs if the prevailing structural and hydrological considerations are adequate. Touchup repair and scour protection measures, structural conditions are all right but hydraulic conditions are not met.
The format prescribed in SP-19 has been enhanced to accommodate additional features such as wearing coat, expansion joint and railing condition, floor protection and approach slab. There are total 10 bridges, 1 of them is major and remaining 9 are minor bridges. The abstract of bridge inventory is presented in Table 2.8. Culvert Inventory covers the following features. i. ii. Location of culvert Span arrangement
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-18
Type of structure Width of carriageway Material of abutment & headwall Condition of slab & pipe Condition of abutment & headwall Protection of bed Presence of scour Hydrological adequacy
There are total 142 culverts, 41 of them are Pipe culverts, 51 are RCC slab culverts, 24 are stone slab culverts, 11 are arch culverts and 15 are in choked condition. The abstract of culvert inventory is presented in Table 2.10.
Detailed visual inspections were carried out in addition to Non-Destructive Tests (NDT). Special attention was paid to the Condition Survey of various features of bridges and hydraulic adequacy. The NDT (Rebound hammer and Ultrasonic pulse velocity and corrosion test by half cell potential meter) tests were conducted for bridges at Chainage 11/660 and 17/900 to study the structural soundness of the structures. Some of photographs showing NDT tests are presented in Plate 1. There are total 10 bridges. Analytical study of the Condition Survey data has been carried out and following important conclusions are arrived: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. Approach slab of 150 mm thick has been provided in most of the bridges as per the Existing bridge drawing received. Mastic asphalt in case of bituminous concrete wearing coat has not been provided in any bridge. The condition of the expansion joints in most of the bridges is poor. Bridge at Ch 11/270 is narrow having 5.0m carriageway width, not in good condition, has been recommended for reconstruction. Bridge at Ch 29/500 is narrow in width and in poor condition has been recommended for reconstruction. Bridge at Ch. 4/400 is meant for canal crossing. Bridge at Ch. 11/660 is RR stone masonry bridge with reinforcement exposed in slab.
The abstract of inventory and condition of the existing bridge studies along with the recommendations is presented in Table 2.8 and summary at a glance has been presented in Table 2.9. The photographs showing NDT tests are shown in Plate 1. The Photographs of some of bridges to be dismantled is presented in Plate 2 and for rehabilitation in Plate 3.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-19
Well foundation Good, Nothing to do Reconstruction due to Open foundation narrow in width and poor condition
Table: 2.9 Summary of Existing Bridges Type of Action Required Nothing to do cases Rehabilitation cases Replaced due to Poor condition Replaced due to Submersible condition No. 1 7 2 Nil
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-20
Plate 1
2-21
Plate 2
Bridge at Ch:11/270
Bridge at Ch:11/270
Bridge at Ch:29/500
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-22
Plate 3
Bridge at Ch:4/400
Bridge at Ch:15/185
Bridge at Ch:21/850
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-23
2.5.3.2
Culverts
Detailed visual inspection was made for each Culvert and their condition was assessed. The inventory and condition survey of the culverts along the project road were conducted. Analytical study of the Condition Survey data has been carried out and following important conclusions are arrived: i. ii. The total numbers of culverts are 142 in a road length of from km 0/0 to 41/0 i.e. in a stretch of 41.00 km. Most of the culverts do not meet the considerations of maintenance of culverts (minimum vent size) as specified in IRC: SP-13- 2004, para 13.3.2. Most of the CD culverts are having overall width less than 12 m. These culverts have been widened if horizontal and vertical profile permits. Return walls, Head walls or parapet walls of most of the culverts are damaged and proposed to be reconstructed in case the culvert condition is good and alignment permits. 65 Nos of culverts are RR stone masonry with RCC deck slab out of 76 slab culverts in poor condition and most of them have been proposed to be reconstructed. Most of the culverts have been provided without any protection works. 24 culverts with stone slab deck have been recommended for reconstruction. Culverts at Ch.10/470,10/510,13/250,18/350 & 24/560 are suggested to abandoned as they are not required as per the site condition.
iii. iv.
v.
The following table presents abstract of inventory and condition of existing culverts along with the recommendation.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
0/190 0/350 0/830 0/950 1/150 1/310 1/785 2/140 2/285 2/515 2/630 2/745 3/105 3/265 3/390 3/505 3/775 3/895 4/115 5/145 5/230 5/535 5/775 6/090 6/555 6/590 7/020 7/240 7/540 7/630 7/795 8/030 8/210 8/385 8/550 8/700 9/175 9/600 9/810 10/370 10/470 10/510 10/965 11/120 11/500 12/040 12/380 12/585 12/810 12/880 13/110 13/250 13/265
1 x 1.75 1 x 2.0 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 3 x 0.9 1 x 1.5 1 x 2.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.4 1 x 2.5 1 x 0.7 1 x 0.7 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.5 2 x 1.5 1 x 2.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 2.0 2 x 1.0 1 x 0.5 1 x 3.0 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 2 x 1.5 1 x 0.9 1 x 1.5 2 x 0.8 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 3 x 1.2 1 x 0.9 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5
Choked Slab Slab Choked Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Stone Slab Pipe Slab Slab Stone Slab Stone Slab Slab Slab Stone Slab Arch Slab Pipe Choked Stone Slab Stone Slab Pipe Stone Slab Slab Slab Slab Pipe Stone Slab Slab Choked Slab Stone Slab Slab Choked Choked Choked Slab Arch Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Stone Slab Choked Slab
Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened To be widened Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition To be widened To be widened Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Nothing to do Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Nothing to do Nothing to do Nothing to do Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Nothing to do Replaced due to poor condition Nothing to do Replaced due to insufficient vent To be abandoned To be abandoned To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Nothing to do Replaced due to poor condition To be abandoned Replaced due to poor condition
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-25
Sl. No.
Location/ Chainage
Type of Culvert
Recommendation
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
13/450 13/600 13/790 13/895 14/135 14/510 14/855 15/430 15/880 16/050 16/400 16/505 16/750 16/950 17/650 18/020 18/105 18/350 18/470 19/240 19/430 19/570 19/845 20/355 20/610 20/930 21/015 21/230 21/420 21/875 22/210 22/605 22/790 22/985 23/180 23/300 23/515 23/750 23/850 24/365 24/560 24/650 24/1020 25/050 25/695 25/905 26/150 26/430 26/850 27/600 27/850 28/375 28/800 30/060 30/460 30/720
1 x 3.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.2 1 x 1.0 1 x 3.0 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.6 NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 2.3 1 x 0.8 NV 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.9 2 x 1.7 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.9 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.45 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.2 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.6 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.9 1 x 0.7 1 x 0.3 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.8 1 x 4.7 1 x 1.85 1 x 0.95 1 x 0.5 1 x 3.1 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.65 3 x 1.2 1 x 3.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.8
Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Slab Choked Stone Slab Slab Slab Slab Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Stone Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Stone Slab Stone Slab Choked Pipe Choked Slab Pipe Choked Slab Arch Slab Slab Arch Stone Slab Slab Arch Pipe Stone Slab Choked Pipe Slab Pipe Slab
Nothing to do Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition To be widened To be widened Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to submergence Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition To be abandoned Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition To be widened To be extended Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition To be extended Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened To be extended Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened Replaced due to insufficient vent To be abandoned Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened Replaced due to poor condition To be widened
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-26
Sl. No.
Location/ Chainage
Type of Culvert
Recommendation
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
31/960 32/300 33/220 33/310 33/806 33/900 34/250 34/525 34/640 34/675 35/204 35/350 35/825 36/060 36/220 36/500 36/575 36/800 36/990 37/440 37/985 38/450 38/600 38/810 38/960 39/195 39/340 39/455 39/900 40/100 40/240 40/420 40/815
1 x 0.8 NV 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.6 NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.8 1 x 2.9 2 x 0.9 1 x 2.1 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.8 NV 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.8 1 x 3.2 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.85 1 x 1.35 2 x 0.45 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5
Stone Slab Pipe Slab Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Arch Stone Slab Stone Slab Stone Slab Stone Slab Choked Pipe Pipe Pipe Stone Slab Arch Stone Slab Slab Slab Choked Arch Arch Slab Arch Arch Slab Stone Slab Slab Slab
Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition To be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition
Table 2.11: Summary of Existing Culverts Type of Culvert Pipe Slab Stone slab Choked Arch Total 2.6 PAVEMENT INVESTIGATIONS Nos. 41 51 24 15 11 142
This section describes the studies and investigations carried out on existing pavement condition to determine the most technically sound and economically feasible pavements design. The investigations include: Visual Inspection Survey i. Pavement Composition. ii. Roughness Survey iii.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-27
iv.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-28
To (KM)
1/0 2/0 3/0 4/0 5/0 6/0 7/0 8/0 9/0 10/0 11/0 12/0 13/0 14/0 15/0 16/0 17/0 18/0 19/0 20/0 21/0 22/0 23/0 24/0 25/0
Cracking (%)
2 2 4 -
Ravelling (%)
0.1 1.5 2.0 0.1 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 0.5 0.3 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.3 1.5 2.0 1.0
Pothole (Nos)
30 35 15 31 35 69 24 13 6 22 28 78 92 83 6 8 7 78
Potholing (%)
2.0 2.0 0.3 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 3.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 3.0
Embankment Height
1.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 0.2 1.0 0.3 1.5 2 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.2
Remarks
Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage
Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-29
To (KM)
26/0 27/0 28/0 29/0 30/0 31/0 32/0 33/0 34/0 35/0 36/0 37/0 38/0 39/0 40/0 41/0
Quality G/F/P/ VP
P P P P P P VP P VP VP VP F P VP P G
Ravelling (%)
2.0 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.5 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.5 1.0 0.2 3.0 4.0 1.5 -
Pothole (Nos)
52 31 27 32 13 33 44 73 88 97 83 17 31 22 78 -
Patchin -g (Nos)**
17 25 24 20 38 48 37 58 85 46 38 24 35 12 27 -
Embankment Height
1.0 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.7 1.5 1.2 1 1.7 1.8
Remarks
Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage Edge Damage
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-30
Cracking (%)
5 4 3 2 1 0 2/0 5/0 8/0 11/0 14/0 17/0 20/0 23/0 26/0 29/0 32/0 35/0 38/0 41/0
Chainage in Km.
Figure 2.1: Cracking (%) Variation along the stretch
Ravelling (%)
3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1/0 3/0 5/0 7/0 9/0 11/0 13/0 15/0 17/0 19/0 21/0 23/0 25/0 27/0 29/0 31/0 33/0 35/0 37/0 39/0 41/0
Chainage in Km.
Figure 2.2: Raveling (%) Variation along the stretch
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-31
5.0
Potholing (%)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0 2/0 5/0 8/0 11/0 14/0 17/0 20/0 23/0 26/0 29/0 32/0 35/0 38/0 41/0
Chainage in Km.
Figure 2.3: Potholing (%) Variation along the stretch
Patching(%)
6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2/0 5/0 8/0 11/0 14/0 17/0 20/0 23/0 26/0 29/0 32/0 35/0 38/0 41/0
Chainage in Km.
Figure 2.4:Patching (%) Variation along the stretch
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-32
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-33
The roughness surveys have been carried out using Bump Integrator. The calibration of the instrument has been done as per the procedure given in the World Banks Technical Publications and duly got authenticated by CRRI. The surveys have been carried out along the left and right wheel paths. The surveys have covered a minimum of two runs along the wheel paths for each direction. The results of the survey have been expressed in terms of UI and IRI are presented in Table 2.14.
Table 2.14: Roughness Value in IRI
Chainage From 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Chainage From 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 To 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Avg.UI (mm/Km) 3010 2420 8840 9390 3680 7890 7750 8730 8580 7930 3830 7770 3720 3830 2990 3710 8760 8710 10840 9140 8130
IRI Value (m/Km) 2.822 2.337 7.612 8.064 3.372 6.831 6.716 7.522 7.398 6.864 3.495 6.733 3.405 3.495 2.805 3.397 7.546 7.505 9.255 7.859 7.029
Avg.UI (mm/Km) 3090 8760 6740 5760 6760 6040 6020 5680 5320 7960 8140 5490 8560 7290 5910 3770 8180 8370 7630 3515
IRI Value (m/Km) 2.887 7.546 5.886 5.081 5.903 5.311 5.295 5.015 4.720 6.889 7.037 4.859 7.382 6.338 5.204 3.446 7.070 7.226 6.618 3.236
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-34
2.7
2.7.1 General
Traffic Safety is an important aspect of a road project. It is a matter of deep concern that in India, deaths in road accidents every year are more than all other types of accidental deaths taken together like drowning, industrial accidents, poisoning, fire, railway accidents and even natural calamities etc. India is a developing country and safety of roads is still in a premature stage. Not much importance is given to road safety in most of our roads. The existing single lane to intermediate lanes has been proposed to be widened to two lanes to decongest and to provide a high-speed corridor for the movement of passenger and goods traffic. Considerations have been given to a safe design of the road components to reduce accident involving both human and vehicles. Some of the important design considerations are listed below, i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. Higher operating speed of the vehicles Road geometric components Partial access control High standards of traffic safety Efficient and effective road signage schemes Appropriate road safety structures
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-35
Improved roads minimize the occurrence of accidents and reduce the accident cost. Thereby making the proposed facility more safe and user friendly to traffic. Traffic on the Project Roads is mixed traffic comprising fast moving cars/ buses/ coaches to slow moving agricultural tractors, 3-wheelers and bi-cycles plus pedestrians and farm animals all moving along. The Project Roads have not pedestrian lane or cycle tracks to accommodate this traffic in the built up-sections. The road geometric has been designed to provide and maintain harmony between the local community and better, faster and safer high speed State Highway. The poor geometry of the road affects the risk and severity of the accidents. Hence appropriate design has been adopted so as to minimize the presence of sudden elements of surprise and to increase effective decision making of the road user traffic. This has been achieved by providing and improving the road safety features, road signage, partial access control, crash barriers etc. The main causes observed for traffic accidents on the Project Road are: i. Traffic on the road is far in excess of the capacity of a single lane road, and hence there is frustration among motor vehicle drivers about the low speeds achievable and the lack of over taking opportunities; Presence of slower vehicles that too without reflectors on the rear side, incites overtaking by the faster moving vehicles and causes accidents and also parked vehicles along the road without reflectors/back light; Undisciplined driving by the drivers in general, and the bus/coach, truck drivers in particular; Inadequate sight/stopping distances which results in accident during overtaking; Present of large diameter trees next to the paved carriageway (within 1000-1500 mm) causes vehicles to hit the trees either to avoid an overtaking incoming vehicle or skidding while overtaking on curves or slippery carriageway / wet unpaved shoulder; The geometry of the existing road which has very poor sight distance; Frequent parking of breakdown vehicles within the carriageway thereby requiring overtaking and consequently accidents; Combination of horizontal and vertical curves for the two-way traffic carriageway; Lack of access control in the built up sections, resulting in traffic from connecting minor roads entering the main carriageway; Unpainted/damaged parapet walls, absence of reflectors; Frequent occurrence of bridges and culverts having in adequate width Absence of guard beams at bridge approaches results in vehicles colliding with railings, and in some cases falling off bridges; 2-36
ii.
iii. iv. v.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
xiii. xiv.
Absence of guard beams at high embankments and sharper horizontal curves; and Absence of proper road markings, and warning, cautionary and hazard signs.
The accident statistics of the state of Orissa, compiled by the consultant was presented in the Feasibility Report. The statistics and the results presented a gloomy picture in general and horrendous at several black spots identified by the Consultant along the project road.
2 1
1 1 3 3 2
1 3
2 2
1 1
3 2
2 2
2-37
Though the present project road does not have any Major junctions, many minor junctions are present. The following points were observed with respect to the junctions, i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. None of the junctions along the project road had been designed as per the standards, Most of the junctions had no appropriate road markings to guide the merging as well as the main road traffic, Most of the intersections had no pedestrian crossing facility, The junction signage were absent, Most of the junctions had insufficient sight distance, turning radius etc. All the junctions are at grade junction,
The list of the major and minor junctions are presented below with the types of the junction,
Table 2.16: List of Junctions
S. No. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Chainage 0.00 1.95 2.54 3.01 5.55 7.21 8.34 11.71 12.80 12.79 15.09 15.85 16.42 18.70 22.64 24.59 25.18 27.13 28.57 29.51 32.52 32.60 36.38 36.75 37.00 37.52 Type Y-Type T-Type T-Type Y-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type 4-Legged T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type Y-Type 4-Legged Y-Type Y-Type LHS/RHS Major Junction LHS RHS LHS LHS LHS RHS LHS LHS RHS RHS RHS LHS RHS LHS Major Junction LHS RHS RHS RHS RHS LHS RHS RHS LHS
2-38
totally absent in the present project corridor. Some of the observations of the consultant are given below, i. ii. iii. iv. No Provision of footpath at the built up section on both sides of the Road. No road markings for the pedestrian crossing at congested intersections and market places. No signboard for speed reduction at built up sections. No access control facility.
The road markings are almost absent along the present section of the Project Road. This results in ineffective guiding of the traffic flow, hence tending to increase the road accidents. The junctions do not have any pavement markings and no traffic islands, which makes the junction a potential black spot along the corridor.
Road Signs
The road signs along the project road are grossly insufficient either to provide the drivers with information or to guide the drivers of the road features while driving. The drivers are often taken by surprise with sharp curves, congested built up, sudden change of speed, road humps, intersections etc.
Road Delineators
The bus lay-bys along the existing project road are of very low standards. There are no proper and safe bus shelter structures provided for the passengers waiting for the bus. The bus shelter structure is not aesthetically pleasing and functional so as to protect the waiting passengers from sun, rain and wind. The current bus bays do not have any extra widening or extra lane dedicated for the buses. Thus the buses stop to drop and pick passengers on the main carriageway causing traffic disruptions and road mishaps.
Truck Lay-Bys
The project road does not have any truck lay byes at present. As a result the truck use the shoulder as well as the main carriageway to park their vehicles for refreshments or for washing the vehicle. In any case the carriageway capacity is reduced and affects the movement of the traffic on the road.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-39
Crash Barriers
Crash barriers/high embankment protective works are almost absent along the whole of the project road. Thus making the accidents more severe and increasing the loss of life and property.
Guard Post
Guard Post or protective works of similar nature are mostly not provided to the bridge approaches. In such cases the accidents at such locations can be of serious nature.
vi. vii.
viii.
The road safety measure has been fully inculcated in the detailed design and the various safety measures are discussed in detail in Chapter-7 Detailed DesignRoad Safety Measures, Traffic Control and Other Facilities.
2.8 SURVEYING UTILITY SERVICES
Except for the vicinity of built-up and roadside establishments, the project road alignment runs through open country with predominantly agricultural land use. Hence, the project road is relatively free from the problems associated with utilities and services.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-40
All the utility services such as electric power lines, electric poles, telephone posts and telephone lines etc. were recorded during survey. Strip plan indicating the scheme for carriageway widening, location of all existing utility services (both over and underground) and the scheme for their relocation has been prepared separately.
2.9 TRAFFIC SURVEY
The traffic surveys were conducted to determine classified traffic volumes in terms of Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), directional split, hourly variation, trip length pattern, travel pattern of goods and passenger traffic, commodity flow and axle loads. The details of these have already been presented in Feasibility Report Chapter -7. Abstract of findings have been presented in following paragraphs.
2W
3W
2685 223 416 132 222 107 179 30 25 113 17 3802 192 9 0 1343 223 416 199 665 160 538 91 115 509 26 1902 385 75 0 64.7% 5.4% 10.0% 3.2% 5.4% 2.6% 4.3% 0.7% 0.6% 2.7% 0.4% 95.0% 4.8% 0.2% 0.0% 1433 174 289 70 201 54 121 13 2 32 9 1172 8 10 0 717 174 289 105 603 81 362 40 9 145 15 587 17 83 0 59.8% 7.3% 12.1% 2.9% 8.4% 2.3% 5.0% 0.5% 0.1% 1.3% 0.4% 98.5% 0.7% 0.8% 0.0%
Table 2.17: Summary of AADT and PCU Count Stn. Description Total Motorised Vehicle 4149 4285 1432 1987 Total Comm. Vehicle 808 2277 2398 2540 Total Non Motorised Vehicle 4003 2362 493 1345 Total Vehicle
VC-7 VC-8
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-41
The Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) has been calculated direction wise and a higher value has been adopted for design. In light of the order passed by the Honble Supreme Court of India on dated 9th November 2005 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 136 of 2003 (Paramjit Bhasin and Others v/s Union of India), the over loading of the trucks beyond legal axle loads will be ceased in coming years. Therefore, the observed calculated values have been adopted for first five years only i.e. from 2008 to 2013. Beyond this period, the VDF values higher than 3.5 have been moderated to 3.5. Abstract of VDF is as presented in Table 2.18 and design year MSA in Table 2.19.
Table 2.18: Design VDF Station Road Section Recommended values of VDF for 2-Axle Truck 3-Axle Truck LCV 2008-13 2013-28 2008-13 2013-28
0.18 3.71 3.5 3.71 3.5
Table 2.19: Design MSA Location VC-7 VC-8 Design Year 2028 2028 Design MSA
14.40 8.65
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-42
Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 VC-7 17548 18344 19190 20088 21043 22058
AADT VC-8 8828 9276 9752 10257 10794 11364 VC-7 17529 18526 19594 20737 21962 23275
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
2-43
CHAPTER 3
3.1
GENERAL The existing road is a single lane carriageway road with horizontal and vertical geometric average to poor. As detailed out in Final Feasibility, the road shall be upgraded to two lane carriageway facilities with hard shoulders on either side of the carriageway. The design philosophy that will be followed embodies the following. i. ii. iii. iv. v. Facility should be of State Highway standards. Facility must meet the needs for development activities in the region. Travel should be safe, with in-built engineering features. Facility should be aesthetically pleasing and should not be visually intrusive. Facility should meet the environmental conditions.
While designing, improvement shall be done for widening to two lanes, horizontal and vertical geometry, road intersections, road signs, road markings, drainage system, bus bays and other road features as per requirements. Computer software have been used for plan and profile design. 3.2 DESIGN STANDARDS Design Standards for the State Highway requirements have been framed for following items for providing the desirable level of service, safety and comfort to the vehicle using the facility. Design Standards given in IRC Codes, Guidelines and Special Publications besides MoSRTH circulars and specifications as applicable to State Highways have been followed and also taking into consideration the inputs given by the OWD Officials on the local conditions. List of IRC publications referred for design is given in following table.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-1
Type Designs for Pick-Up Bus Stops on Rural (I.E., Non-Urban) Highways Tentative Guidelines on the Provision of Speed Breakers for Control of Vehicles IRC:99-1988 Speeds on Minor Roads IRC SP:23-1983 Vertical Curves for Highways IRC SP:41-1994 Guidelines on Design of At-Ggrade Intersections in Rural and Urban Areas Most Specifications for Roads & Bridge Works (2001) (Fourth Revision) Most Typel Designs for Intersections on National Highways Manual for Safety in Road Design
3.3
GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS For this Project Road, Geometric Design Standards as per IRC: 73-1980 Geometric Design Standards for Rural (Non-urban) Highway and IRC: SP-48 -1998 has been generally followed. Based on these documents, the requirements of Geometric Design Standards are given below. The main design components are: i. ii. iii. iv. v. Geometric design: Alignment and Profile Cross-sectional elements Intersections Wayside amenities Service Roads
To enable the design of above components, design standards adopted are given in the following paragraphs.
3-2
Table 3.2: Terrain Classifications as per IRC Sl no. 1 2 3 4 Terrain Classification Plain Rolling Mountainous Steep % Cross Slope of the Country 0 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 60 60 and above
The design speed of the project road has been adopted as per the design speeds given in Table 3.3 and the terrain classification of the project road section. But at certain sections, lower design speeds have been adopted as per record on instructions by the PIU officers. These changes have been agreed to and adopted to minimize the corridor impact of the proposed project on the social life and also to minimize the land acquisition. Attempts have been made to restrict the road design within the existing ROW in heavy built up sections.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-3
The existing ROW along the project road is not uniform and lesser then the IRC Recommendations. However, for improvement of junctions, relocation, realignment etc, design has been as per functional requirement. Additional land acquisition has been kept to the minimum for these areas. Due to lesser/ limited existing ROW at certain sections and to minimize the Corridor of Impact (COI) and the land acquisition, the Consultant, World Bank Mission and the OWD together agreed upon to vary the limits set out in the IRC guidelines. Accordingly different ROW limits were adopted. With reference to the Preparation Mission Aide Memo ire (July 4-13, 2006), Technical Aspects Para 23 Design and Engineering Issues, for Berhampur to Taptapani road the ROW (absolute minimum corridor of impact, COI), in built-up areas has COI of 15m. If land needed to be acquired then such acquisition will be done up to 16m. In non built-up sections the minimum COI (Assuming an embankment height of 2m) has been taken about 22m. Cross-Slope For the project road each carriageway has a cross slope of 2.50 per cent. The paved/hard shoulder and earthen shoulder has a slope of 2.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent respectively. Roadway Details i. Carriageway The Project road has been designed as a two-lane carriageway with hard shoulders. The width of two lanes has been taken as 7.0m. ii. Shoulder Hard Shoulders are provided as proposed in Final Feasibility Report and have a width of 2.5m on either side of carriageway. iii. Total Roadway Width Total roadway width has been taken as 12.00 m.
V2 254 f
3-4
The safe stopping sight distance, overtaking sight distance as recommended in the IRC:73-1980 is shown in Table 3.5 Table 3.5: Minimum recommended Sight Distances Speed (Km/h) 100 80 65 60 50 40 30 20 Safe Stopping Sight Distance (m) 180 120 90 80 60 45 30 20 Overtaking Sight Distance (m) 640 370 340 300 235 165 Intermediate Sight Distance (m) 360 240 180 160 120 90 60 40
Where, V= vehicle speed in km/hr e= super elevation (maximum 0.07) ratio in meter per meter. f = co-efficient of side friction (taken as 0.15) R= Radius in meters Radius for some selected design speeds are given in Table 3.6. Table 3.6: Absolute Minimum Radius
Plain Road Classification Rolling Terrain Mountainous and steep Terrain Open areas Built-up areas Ruling minimum 24 Absolute minimum 20
Areas not affected Snow bound by snow areas Ruling Absolute Absolute Ruling minimum minimum minimum minimum 45 30-60 30 30-60
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-5
Super Elevation As per Clause 9.3 of IRC: 73-1980, super elevation is given as follows. e= Where, e = Super elevation in meter per meter V = speed in km/h R= radius in meters The maximum super elevation has been kept as 7 % at plain to rolling and 10% for the mountainous sections. No super elevation has been proposed when its value obtained is less than the road camber. Radii beyond which super elevation is not proposed are given in Table 3.7, as per IRC: 73 - 1980. Table 3.7: Radius Beyond Which Super Elevation not Required Design speed (km/h) 100 80 65 50 40 35 30 25 20 Radius (m) 1800 1100 750 450 280 220 160 110 70 V2 225 R
Transition Curve Longer of the two values of minimum length of the transition curve derived from the following equations has been adopted. (Clause 9.5 of IRC:731980). 0.0215 V3 CR 2.7 V2 R
i) Ls = Where,
and
ii) Ls =
Ls = Length of transition in meters V = speed in km/hr R = Radius of Circular Curve in meter C = 80 / (75+V),
Subject to a maximum of 0.8 and minimum of 0.5
Minimum transition length for some radii is given in Table 17 of IRC: 73-1980.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-6
Extra Widening on Curves Extra widening on curves as per provision of IRC: 73 1980 section 9.8 are given in following table. Table 3.8: Extra Widening at Curve Carriageway Two Lane Single Lane Up to 20 1.5 0.9 Radius of Curve (m) 21 to 40 41 to 60 61 to 100 1.5 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.9 101 to 300 0.6 -
Wherever the radius is less than that specified for minimum design speed, the transition curve, super elevation and pavement widening has been introduced. This will minimize the intrusion of vehicles on to adjacent lanes, tend to encourage uniformity of speed and increase vehicle speed at the curves.
Vertical Curves Minimum length of vertical curves adopted in design are as given in following table. The actual length for the vertical curve shall however be provided as per IRC: 73 1980.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-7
Table 3.10: Minimum length of Vertical Curve Design speed km/h 35 40 50 65 80 100 Vertical Clearance IRC: 541978: Chapter 8: Vertical clearance at underpasses shall be at least 5 meters. However, in urban areas, this should be increased to 5.50 meters so that double decker buses could be accommodated. IRC: 731980: 12.2.1 Vertical clearance at underpasses should be minimum 5 meters after making due allowance for any future raising/ strengthening of the underpass roadway. Maximum grade change not requiring a vertical curve (%) 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 Minimum Length of vertical curve (m) 15 20 30 40 50 60
The consultant feels that this will be very expensive and hence recommend providing a side slope of 1:2 with provisions for barriers in high embankments. The side slopes of cuttings depend on the soil type 3.4 DESIGN SOFTWARES Following software have been used for the designing and drafting of road features, alignment, vertical profile etc. MX Road AutoCAD Autodesk Land Development Desktop
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-8
3.5
UTILITY SERVICES Different types of existing utility services components e.g. optical fiber cables (OFC), electric poles, telephone poles are to be shifted out of the proposed road way. For widening the Project Road to two-lane carriageway, all the utility service components coming in the way of the widening will require to be shifted/ relocated. Separate drawings have been prepared for utility shifting plans.
3.6
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
3-9
CHAPTER 4
PAVEMENT DESIGN
4.1 GENERAL Designs for new pavement and overlays are worked out in accordance with Indian and International Practices. The design of new Flexible Pavement is carried out as per IRC: 372001, AASHTO Design Guide (1993), TRL Road Note-31 and Flexible overlays as per IRC: 81-1997. Generally the shoulder is structurally designed to carry 10 to 20% of the traffic load, the design lane is expected to carry. However the structural drainage system of the paved shoulder is required to be integrated with that of the carriageway pavement. The latter condition thus requires the thickness of pavement structure to be the same as that for the traffic lanes since the lower layer of the sub-base for the carriageway is extended to the full width of formation for the lateral drainage of any water percolating into the pavement. Therefore the drainage requirements demand that each carriageway pavement layer be extended to shoulder as this ensures constructional ease, quality and speed. Pavement design has been done by using all the three methods during Feasibility stage and compared all the three methods and concluded that IRC method of design is the best method of design and economical design for Indian conditions. In fact all the three methods cannot be compared as they are developed for different climatic conditions. So, it is recommended to use IRC method for Indian conditions. 4.2 IRC METHOD The Flexible Pavement has been modeled as a three-layer structure. Pavement design has been based on CBR values of sub-grade soil, vehicle damage factor consequent to number of commercial vehicles on the road corridor and considering life of the project as 20 years. 4.3 DESIGN METHODOLOGY For the new lane and widening, the sub grade strength has been considered for the design. Wherever the CBR was found below 4%, the CBR was considered low and the sub grade material is to be obtained from borrow areas identified. For pavement reconstruction, the reconstructed pavements were considered to be placed on existing sub grade fill. The top 250 mm of the existing sub grade is loosened and compacted and new layers are placed on the compacted sub grade. For pavement strengthening by overlay both the forecast traffic volume, the existing crusts details, surface condition of the road and rebound deflection will influence the thickness of the pavement design. If the Differential free Swell Index (DFS) of the sub grade material is more than 50%, then sub grade and the top 500 mm of the embankment material is to be obtained from borrow areas identified (Clause 305.2.1.2 of MoRST&H). Such type of soils whose DFS is more than 50% were found in few kilometers i.e. in Km 9/00 to 11.050, 18/00 to 19/00, 21/00 to 28/150 and 31/00 to 33/00 so, it is recommended to replace the existing swelling fill material with borrow material. The BBD test results are based on the elastic deflection of the pavement under the wheel loads. It again depends upon sub grade soil type, its moisture content and compaction, thickness of different pavement layers and pavement temperature. Existing pavement crust consists of thin BT surface (mostly distressed) and WBM over boulder soling.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
4-1
By using simple input parameters of given sub-grade strength (CBR) and design traffic in terms of MSA, the appropriate designs could be chosen. For the design of pavements to carry traffic in the range of 1 to 10 MSA and for traffic in the range of 10 to 150 MSA for the CBR values of sub grade ranging from 2% to 10%, the thickness design charts are given in IRC: 37-2001. The thickness deduced from the chart for the design CBR value and design traffic is the total pavement thickness to be provided and consists of granular sub base, granular base and bituminous surfacing.
Ns =
365 (1 + r ) 1 ADF r
n
Where; Ns = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of MSA. A = Initial traffic for the design lane in terms of specified type of commercial vehicles per day; D = Lane Distribution Factor r = Annual growth rate of the specified types of commercial vehicles; n = Design life in number of years; F = Vehicle Damage Factor of the type of Commercial vehicle. The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formula.
A = P(1 + r ) Where
P = Number of commercial vehicles as per last count. x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of construction.
4-2
reconstruction is presented in Table 4.3 and pavement thickness of the different sections for Overlay is presented in Table 4.4.
Table 4.l: Design CBR for Berhampur Taptapani corridor
KM From 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 6.00 6.01 5.97 4.44 5.17 4.18 4.31 3.74 3.32 12.08 1.90 2.85 2.85 3.21 2.43 4.72 3.79 3.48 3.06 2.54 3.93 3.56 4.51 6.56 1.62 5.63 5.93 2.51 3.39 2.52 2.08 1.41 5.47 4.52 4.50 2.98 1.99 4.62 3.09 2.58 4.30 Characteristic Deflection Design Deflection Existing Sub grade CBR 9.20 6.20 6.82 5.00 15.00 8.00 5.80 8.50 9.20 8.50 8.90 2.90 4.80 6.80 3.90 13.50 13.50 8.50 7.60 3.13 14.80 8.70 9.50 9.50 10.00 6.00 New construction Reconstruction 9.00 6.00 Reconstruction 7.00 6.00 Overlay Overlay 10.00 6.00 Reconstruction 6.80 12.50 6.00 10.00 6.00 6.00 Overlay Reconstruction Overlay Reconstruction with Design CBR(Deflection values are high) Reconstruction with Design CBR(Deflection values are high) 10.00 6.00 New construction New construction is done due to DFS problem and poor CBR problem Design CBR Design CBR adopted Type of Construction Remarks
6.00
6.00
Reconstruction
3.50 -
7.00 7.00
6.00 6.00
Overlay Reconstruction
3.50
7.00
6.00
Overlay
Overlay
Reconstruction with Design CBR(Deflection values are high) New construction is done due to DFS problem and poor CBR problem Deflection value is high
9.30
9.00
6.00
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
4-3
Table 4.2: Crust details for New Construction with borrow material for the Berhampur Taptapani as per IRC method
S.No
Length in Km
Thickness Design (IRC-37) Crust Details for new Construction Surface Course BC DBM 40 40 75 75 Base WMM1 100 100 WMM2 150 150 Sub Base GSB1 110 110 GSB2 150 150 500 500 500 500 Sub grade Embankment Total Thickness 1625 1625
Remarks
1 2
14.850 36.150
5.150 4.030
DFS>50% DFS>50%
Table 4.3: Crust details for Reconstruction / widening for the Berhampur Taptapani as per IRC method
Thickness Design (IRC-37) S.No PROP Chainage Length in Km Crust Details for Reconstruction Surface Course BC DBM 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 75 75 50 50 50 50 50 Base WMM1 100 100 100 125 125 100 100 WMM2 150 150 150 125 125 150 150 Sub Base GSB1 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 GSB2 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total Thickness 625 625 600 600 600 600 600 Crust Details for Widening Surface Course BC DBM 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 75 75 75 50 50 50 50 Base WMM1 100 100 100 100 125 100 100 WMM2 150 150 150 150 125 150 150 Sub Base GSB1 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 GSB2 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Sub grade 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total Thickness 1125 1125 1125 1100 1100 1100 1100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
4-4
Benkelman Beam Deflection test data was analyzed as per IRC guidelines and characteristic deflection was calculated for each km of the road. Characteristic deflection is estimated as mean rebound deflection plus twice the standard deviation as per IRC guidelines. Correction for temperature is done as per IRC: 81-1997. After de-marking the homogenous sections, characteristic deflection was calculated for each section as mean rebound deflection plus twice the standard deviation. Depending on the traffic loading, overlay thickness in terms of BM (Bituminous Macadam) layer was established as per design chart given in IRC: 81-1997 for each section. Equivalency factors given in IRC: 81-1997 was used to find out the layer thickness of BC (Bituminous Concrete), DBM (Dense Bituminous Concrete) and WMM (Wet Mix Macadam) layers. WMM layer was proposed as a granular overlay below the bituminous layer. Keeping in view all the constraints, this proposal is both cost effective and efficient. Profile corrective course with WMM layer was proposed in place of BM layer, to correct the existing camber as well as undulations in the existing surface.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
4-5
Table 4.4: Crust details for Overlay for the Berhampur Taptapani as per IRC method (IRC: 81-1997)
Thickness Design (IRC-81) Crust Details for Overlay Surface Course BC DBM 40 40 40 40 75 50 50 50 PCC WMM1 100 125 125 125 Total Thickness 215 215 215 215 Surface Course BC DBM 40 40 40 40 75 50 50 50 WMM1 100 125 125 125 Thickness Design (IRC-37) Crust Details for Widening Base WMM2 150 125 125 125 Sub Base GSB1 110 110 110 110 GSB2 150 150 150 150 500 500 500 500 Sub grade Total Thickness 1125 1100 1100 1100
S.No
Length in Km
1 2 3 4
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
4-6
CHAPTER 5
5.1
GENERAL The road drainage is an important aspect for the durability and integrity of the structural strength of the pavement. An effective and an efficient drainage system is a primary requirement for a Road Project. A poor drainage system reduces the life and serviceability of the road. This aspect of road can be referred as the most neglected in the detailed design either due to the lack of engineering experience or due to lack of funds. The roadside drain can be divided in to two types i.e., Surface Drainage and Sub-Surface Drainage.
5-1
IRC SP: 42-1994 and IRC SP: 50-1999. The cross sectional requirements of the drains with respect to hydraulic sufficiency, bed slope, drain types and construction techniques. The roadside drain shall be provided as per the following, i. ii. An effective drainage system for drainage of road shall be designed as per stipulations of IRC SP: 42-1994 and IRC SP: 50-1999. The road side channel will be trapezoidal/ rectangular of adequate capacity to carry 100% surface runoff of drainage area of highway ROW and will be drained to the nearest available natural water course. We propose to adopt trapezoidal section as it is more efficient and economical. This will be kuchha to drain out in the open field or to the defined outfall points. Lined rectangular drain will be adopted in urban areas. The superstructure shall be drained with suitable drainage spouts and by means of a combination of drainage spouts and longitudinal drain supported from the superstructure and discharging through vertical drainpipes at pier locations. Suitable profiles of channels and pipe runs shall be provided at crossing with service needs and utilities to ensure that conflicts do not occur.
iii.
iv.
v.
Accordingly to the requirements varying from location to location, two types of drains has been proposed for the present Project road. The two types of the drains are given below, i. ii. RCC Box covered drains for the Built-up Sections Unlined open trapezoidal drains for the rural sections.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
5-2
The typical cross section is presented below in Figure 5.1 and Figure. 5.2. The details of the cross-section have been presented in Standard Drawings, Volume.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
5-3
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
5-4
5.4
DRAINAGE ON HIGH EMBANKMENT Drainage on high embankment needs care and judicious considerations. The water from the carriageway and shoulder if let down directly on the high embankment slopes will damage the slopes severely with the formation of water cuts and will ultimately result in the failure of the slope. Chute drains and drain water collection piths shall be provided as per the guidelines detailed in IRC SP: 50-1999. The surface runoff may be collected in collection piths and shall be drained through chute drains provided at suitable interval of 10m to 15m. The chute drains shall be lined with cement concrete. The side slopes shall be protected with grass turfing in open areas for embankments more than 3m height. The slope protection on high embankments near approaches of bridges has been protected with stone pitching for a height upto HFL plus free board.
5.5
LONGITUDINAL GRADIENT The type of the drain, construction material and the properties of the soil present in the section will govern the longitudinal gradient of the roadside drains. Taking into account these factors a minimum longitudinal gradient of 0.3% is considered satisfactory as per the IRC guidelines.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
5-5
.CHAPTER 6
IRC:SP:13-2004 Guidelines for the Design of small Bridges and Culverts IRC: SP:33-1989
IRC: SP:35-1990 Guidelines for inspection and maintenance of Bridges IRC: SP:37-1991 Guidelines for evaluation of load carrying capacity of Bridges. IRC: SP:40-1993 Guidelines on Techniques for strengthening and rehabilitation of Bridges.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-1
6.2
PROPOSED BRIDGES Presently there are 10 bridges. Their location and existing span arrangements are as indicated in Table 6.2. The bridge at location 29/230 is major and remaining are minor bridges. Bridge at location 11/270 is in poor condition and narrow in width, it is recommended for re-construction. The bridge at location 1/915 is slightly realigned and will be widened and the bridge at location 29/500 is realigned and narrow in width is, it is recommended for reconstruction. The details of proposed major and minor bridges are as follows. Table 6.2: Proposed Bridges
S. Location/ Design No Chainage Chainage . Existing Span Arrangement Overall Proposed Span Carriageway Width of Arrangement Width (m) Bridge (m) Remarks Widening required due to change of alignment Good, Rehabilitation required Reconstruction due to poor condition Rehabilitation required Good, Rehabilitation required Good, Rehabilitation required Good, Rehabilitation required Good, Rehabilitation required Good, Nothing to do Reconstruction due to narrow in width, poor in condition and in realignment
1/915
1/925
2 x 6.6
4/400
4/370
3 x 6.75
3 4 5
11.0 -
12.0 -
15/680
15/727
4 X 6.8
17/900
17/851
4 x 6.8
8 9
21/850 29/230
21/731 29/278
3 x 10.8 3 x 42.2
10
29/500
29/560
2 x 7.0
11.0
12.0
6.3
WIDTH In reference to clause 112 of IRC: 5-1998, width of proposed minor bridges have been kept equal to the formation width which is 12.0m. In built-up areas, raised footpath of 1.5m widths shall be provided on both sides for minor bridges keeping total width as 12m. The carriageway for these bridges shall be 7.5m. . All major bridges have been proposed for 2-lane carriageway with footpath making a total width of 12.0m.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-2
6.4
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY The superstructure for RCC T-beam and Solid slab bridges has been taken from MOST standard drawings (Standard Plans For Highway Bridges). Moving live loads were applied to determine the critical load combinations. Output of the STAAD has been used for further detailed design using standard Excel Spreadsheets. End cross-girders have been designed for bearing replacement condition supported on Jacks. Slab bridges have been designed for unit width by taking dispersion of live loads as per IRC:21-2000. The different components of Substructure and foundation have been designed for the loads coming from super structure & other loads using Excel Spreadsheets..
6.5
DESIGN LOADS Following loads has been considered for design as per IRC:6-2000.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-3
On piers parallel to the direction of water current, the intensity of pressure is given by following equation.
p = 52 KV 2 Where, p = intensity of pressure in kg/m2 K = a constant, value depends on shape of pier V= velocity of current at point where pressure intensity is to be determined in m/s. (which is zero at the point of deepest scour and 2 times maximum mean velocity at the free surface).
6.6
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
Detail specifications for material shall be given separately in bidding document. However, general design requirements adopted in detail designs are as follows.
6.6.1 Concrete
In accordance with IRC: 21-2000 Table -5, following minimum grade of concrete has been used for moderate and severe conditions of exposure for different components:
Member
PCC Members RCC Members PSC Members
Other Minor Bridges & Culverts Moderate Conditions of Exposure M 25 M 15 PSC/ Major Bridges
M 30 M 35 M 20 -
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-4
M 20 M 25 -
6.6.4 Bearings
Tarpaper bearing has been provided for RCC solid Slab superstructure of minor bridges upto 11m span. Elastomeric bearings have been provided for other type of simply supported superstructures and Slab super structures exceeding 10m span. These bearings have been designed as per IRC: 83 (Part-II)-1987. POT fixed / POT PTFE sliding bearing has been proposed for long span simply supported super structures. Design loads coming on the bearings has been provided to enable the manufacturer to design and supply.
6.7
DETAIL DESIGN
Detailed structural analysis and designs for the new structures have been presented in the Detailed Project Report (DPR) in separate volume.
6.8
PROPOSED CULVERTS
A detailed inventory and condition survey was made and the results have been presented in Chapter-02. Culverts in good condition and adequate size, which meets the requirements of plan and profile in respect of highway geometry and levels, have been retained and been widened to make full formation width if narrow. The culverts,
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-5
which need replacement due to poor condition or inadequate size, have already been indicated in Chapter-02. The culverts, which are abundant due to change in horizontal alignment or change in vertical alignment, are proposed for replacement along new alignment. A list of proposed culverts is given below in Table 6.3.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-6
Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to raising in RCC Box road level Replaced due to poor Pipe condition Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to raising in RCC Box road level Pipe Good, to be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to poor Pipe condition
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-7
S. Location/ No. Chainage 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 7/020 7/240 7/540 7/630 7/795 8/030 8/210 8/385 8/550 8/700 9/175 9/600 9/810 10/370 10/965 11/120 11/500 12/040 12/380 12/585 12/810 12/880 13/110 13/265 13/450 13/600 13/790
Proposed Chainage 7000.0 7217.0 7520.0 7605.0 7769.0 8008.0 8193.0 8363.0 8530.0 8685.0 9152.0 9538.0 9786.0 10340.0 10933.0 11120.0 11500.0 12065.0 12407.0 12611.0 12836.0 12907.0 13132.0 13288.0 13470.0 13619.0 13809.0
Existing Span Arrangement 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 2.0 2 x 1.0 1 x 0.5 1 x 3.0 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 2 x 1.5 1 x 0.9 1 x 1.5 2 x 0.8 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 3 x 1.2 1 x 0.9 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 3.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.2
Type of Existing Culvert Stone Slab Pipe Stone Slab Slab Slab Slab Pipe Stone Slab Slab Choked Slab Stone Slab Slab Choked Slab Arch Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Stone Slab Slab Slab Pipe Pipe
Proposed Span Arrangement 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 1/23/0 2 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/33/0 2 x 1.0 1/23/0 2 x 1.0 1/23/0 1/22/0 2 x 1.5 2 x 1.0 1/23/0 2 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/33/0 1 x 0.9 1 x 1.0 1/23/0 1/33/0 1 x 1.0 1/22/0
Type of Proposed Culvert Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box Pipe Pipe RCC Box Pipe RCC Box Pipe RCC Box RCC Box Pipe
Remarks Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Good, to be widened Good, to be widened Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to raising in road level, to be used as Wild Life Under Pass Replaced due to insufficient vent Good, to be widened
Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to poor Pipe condition Replaced due to poor Pipe condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Pipe Good, to be extended
Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to raising in RCC Box road level Replaced due to poor Pipe condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-8
S. Location/ No. Chainage 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 13/895 14/135 14/510 14/855 15/430 15/880 16/050 16/400 16/505 16/750 16/950 17/650 18/020 18/105 18/470 19/240 19/430 19/570 19/845 20/355 20/610 20/930 21/015 21/230 21/420 21/875 22/210 22/605
Proposed Chainage 13916.0 14157.0 14531.0 14877.0 15440.0 15897.0 16068.0 16417.0 16521.0 16770.0 16970.0 17666.0 18028.0 18115.0 18480.0 19192.0 19382.0 19530.0 19799.0 20361.0 20614.0 20935.0 21005.0 21224.0 21411.0 21865.0 22189.0 22582.0
Existing Span Arrangement 1 x 1.0 1 x 3.0 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 0.6 NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 2.3 1 x 0.8 NV 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.9 2 x 1.7 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.9 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.45 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.2 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.6
Type of Existing Culvert Pipe Slab Pipe Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Slab Stone Slab Slab Slab Slab Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Stone Slab Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab
Proposed Span Arrangement 1 x 1.0 1 x 3.0 1 x 1.0 1/22/0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/33/0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/43/0 1/22/0 1 x 1.0 2 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/22/0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.2 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.6
Type of Proposed Culvert Pipe RCC Box Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box RCC Box Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe -
Remarks Good, to be extended Good, to be widened Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to submergence Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to raising in road level Good, to be extended Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Good, to be extended Replaced due to insufficient vent Good, to be widened
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-9
S. Location/ No. Chainage 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 22/790 22/985 23/180 23/300 23/515 23/750 23/850 24/365 24/650 24/1020 25/050 25/695 25/905 26/150 26/430 26/850 27/600 27/850 28/375 28/800 30/060 30/460 30/720 31/960 32/300 33/220 33/310
Proposed Chainage 22761.0 22961.0 23147.0 23255.0 23484.0 23713.0 23821.0 24351.0 24636.0 25106.0 25214.0 25861.0 26072.0 26314.0 26612.0 27026.0 27743.0 28008.0 28547.0 28954.0 30241.0 30637.0 30889.0 32128.0 32465.0 33402.0 33476.0
Proposed Span Arrangement 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/22/0 1/22/0 1/22/0 1/23/0 1/34/0 1/22/0 1/23/0 1 x 1.5 1/22/0 1/22/0 1/23/0 1/44/0 1/22/1 1 x 1.0 1/23/0 1 x 1.0 1/33/0 1/33/0 1 x 1.0 1/23/0 1/22/0 1 x 1.0 1/22/0 1/22/0
Type of Proposed Culvert Pipe Pipe RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box Pipe RCC Box Pipe RCC Box RCC Box Pipe RCC Box RCC Box Pipe RCC Box RCC Box
Remarks Good, to be extended Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Good, to be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition, to be used as Bear Under Pass Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to raising in road level Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition
1 x 0.3
Pipe Choked
1 x 1.5 1 x 0.6 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.8 1 x 4.7 1 x 1.85 1 x 0.95 1 x 0.5 1 x 3.1 1 x 1.0 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.65
Slab Pipe Slab Arch Slab Slab Arch Stone Slab Slab Arch Pipe Stone Slab Choked
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-10
S. Location/ No. Chainage 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 33/806 33/900 34/250 34/525 34/640 34/675 35/204 35/350 35/825 36/060 36/220 36/500 36/575 36/800 36/990 37/440 37/985 38/450 38/600 38/810 38/960 39/195 39/340 39/455 39/900 40/100 40/240 40/420
Proposed Chainage 33976.0 34069.0 34463.0 34670.0 34813.0 34858.0 35378.0 35533.0 36003.0 36238.0 36358.0 36594.0 36758.0 36961.0 37164.0 37619.0 38157.0 38483.0 38746.0 39002.0 39118.0 39375.0 39517.0 39671.0 40090.0 40280.0 40437.0 40610.0
Existing Span Arrangement NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.8 1 x 2.9 2 x 0.9 1 x 2.1 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.6 1 x 0.8 NV 1 x 0.5 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.5 1 x 1.5 1 x 1.5 NV 1 x 0.8 1 x 1.8 1 x 3.2 1 x 0.8 1 x 0.85 1 x 1.35 2 x 0.45 1 x 1.5
Type of Existing Culvert Pipe Pipe Pipe Slab Pipe Arch Stone Slab Stone Slab Stone Slab Stone Slab Choked Pipe Pipe Pipe Stone Slab Arch Stone Slab Slab Slab Choked Arch Arch Slab Arch Arch Slab Stone Slab Slab
Proposed Span Arrangement 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/33/0 1/23/0 1/33/0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.0 1/23/0 1 x 1.0 1 x 1.5 1/22/0 1 x 1.0 1/23/0 1/23/0 1 x 3.2 1/23/0 1/23/0 1/22/0 1/22/0 1/23/0
Type of Proposed Culvert Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe RCC Box Pipe RCC Box
Remarks Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Good, to be widened
Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to Pipe insufficient vent Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition Replaced due to poor RCC Box condition RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box RCC Box Good, to be widened Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to poor condition Replaced due to insufficient vent Replaced due to poor condition
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-11
Type of Culvert Culverts Retained Culverts Widened Pipe extension Slab widening Culverts Replaced New Single Pipe New Double Pipe New Single Box of 1/22/0 New Single Box of 1/22/1 New Single Box of 1/23/0 New Single Box of 1/33/0 New Single Box of 1/34/0 New Single Box of 1/43/0 New Single Box of 1/44/0 Total
Nos. Nil
5 12 51 9 21 1 22 12 1 2 1 137
Culverts at Chainages 2/140, 9/810 and 26/850 are used as wild life underpasses. No culvert lies in do nothing, 17 culverts are proposed for widening to formation width of roadway i.e 12.0m and 120 culverts are proposed for replacement.
6.9
REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
A detailed inspection was made for repair and rehabilitation measures including replacement / retaining of existing bridges. The structures that are in distressed condition (reinforcement exposed and rusted, cracks in the structure, concrete falls by light hammering) have been suggested for Non destructive testing. NDT has been conducted at 2 Nos of bridges in the stretch and NDT report along with recommendations has been submitted to PIU. The rehabilitation proposals for the different structures are as detailed under in Table 6.4.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-12
Table 6.4: Rehabilitation of Minor Bridges S.No. Location Span General Km Arrangement Condition
i. ii.
Recommendation
Abutments and piers shall be widened on right side Existing slab shall be dismantled and new slab shall be constructed Crash barrier shall be cast Filler type expansion joints shall be provided 50mm BC laid over 6mm thick mastic asphalt Drainage spouts shall be provided on each 5.0m distance on both sides Tar paper bearing shall be provided Approach slab to be constructed Return walls shall be constructed on right side Bed protection & curtain walls shall be provided on both u/s & d/s sides Expansion joint shall be replaced by filler type 8.0 mts of railing to be replaced Touch up repair shall be done in wearing coat Approach slab to be reconstructed Reinforcement exposed on pier P2 of area 0.01 sqmt to be gunited by 25 mm thick Vegetation to be removed from the structure and bed. Existing slab,abutment & pier caps shall be dismantled and new slab,caps shall be constructed Jacketing to be done in abutments and piers Crash barrier shall be cast Filler type expansion joint shall be provided 50 mm BC shall be laid over 6 mm thick mastic asphalt
vi. i.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-13
S.No.
Recommendation
Tar paper bearing shall be provided Drainage spouts shall be provided on both sides Approach slab to be reconstructed Return walls to be constructed on right side (2 nos) Expansion joint shall be replaced by filler type Touch up repair to be done in railings Overlay of BT to be removed Vegetation to be removed from the structure and bed Expansion joint shall be replaced by filler type Overlay of BT to be removed 2.0 mts of railings to be replaced Vegetation to be removed from the structure and bed Expansion joint shall be replaced by filler type Overlay of BT to be removed 20.0 mts of railings and total guard posts to be replaced Vegetation to be removed from the structure and bed Expansion joint shall be replaced by filler type Vegetation to be removed from the structure and bed
15/185
2 x 6.8
15/680
4 X 6.8
Good
17/900
4 x 6.8
Good
21/850
3 x 10.8
Good
ii.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
6-14
CHAPTER 7 ROAD SAFETY MEASURES 7.1 GENERAL Highways form an important lifeline for the movement of goods and passengers from one place to another, from a place of raw material to production and to the distribution end. Provision of traffic safety measures on highways gains significance with each year as the number of vehicles and traffic volume increases, hence the accident rates also increases. The road accident data reveals that one person is killed after every third road accident and one person is injured after every accident. Although pedestrians and cyclists are most vulnerable to road accidents but data are silent on these groups. Generally the findings on the basis of available accident data indicate that it is drivers behavior, which is mainly responsible for most of accidents, but it is not fair to ignore the technical aspects of road and traffic regulatory measures. For higher traffic safety it is highly important to incorporate practical safety standards into the highway facilities at the design stage or during improvement and maintenance activities. The design and the safety measures should meet the expectations of the driver and guarantee from unexpected changes in the road conditions which might lead to a traffic accident. Keeping into account the traffic safety drawbacks on the existing facility during the Road Safety Review, traffic safety measures has been taken as a major criterion for the detailed design of the Project Highway and its features to provide a safe and a speedy road. 7.2 ROAD SAFETY MEASURES To increase the traffic safety and to reduce traffic accidents, every component of the Highways and its users has been given equal importance. The road safety measures have been incorporated for the headers detailed below, i. ii. iii. iv. v. The Road Geometric Components Road Pavement Condition Road Junctions Road Furniture Highway Policing and Emergency Response
7-1
uninhabited areas where the existing alignment is safe enough to maintain a speed of 80 Kph, the design speed of 100 Kph has been adopted with minor changes to the alignment. Superelevation is applied according to IRC guidelines with respect to the proposed centreline and the rate of introduction is kept more than the minimum of 1 in 150 as specified by IRC. For a curve without transition, two thirds of the Superelevation is achieved before the start of the circular curve in the straight part, 1/3rd of the Superelevation is achieved in the circular curve portion. The provision of paved shoulders provides additional space for overtaking, slow moving and non-motorised traffic and for parking in the built up section. A wide cross-section (7.0 m carriageway + 1.5 m paved shoulder) has been used in to increase safety, by allowing separation of slower traffic, which can travel on the relatively wide paved shoulder, rather than completely in the main carriageway, which is now the case. This manner further helps to reduce accidents and increase road capacity. All the narrow bridges (less than 7.5m carriageway) are proposed for development to minimum of 7.5m carriageway. All the narrow culverts are proposed for development to full formation width i.e, 12.0 m.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-2
Safety at Junction The safety of a particular intersection design is best assured by studying the frequency with which types of accidents occur at particular type of intersection and its correlation with volume and types of traffic. Intersection improvement can be prioritised based on a simple equation as per IRC: SP-41- 1994. The equation relates the accident frequency with traffic volume. The equation is given below,
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-3
C=
A (Qq )0.5
A=No of accidents a year, Q=Traffic volume on Project road q=Traffic volume on intersecting road (1000 veh per day)
The improved junctions shall be provided with standard road pavement markings, acceleration and deceleration lanes, adequate signboards etc. Widths of Median Island A minimum width of 1.2m has been adopted where median islands are introduced in the absence of a continuous median. Minimum lengths of median islands are 20 m and maximum lengths are based on site requirements. Channelising Islands Channelising islands have been provided depending on the volume of turning traffic and the importance of the road. The minimum area of these islands is 4.5 sq.m. At all intersections a minimum 0.3 to 0.6m island offset from normal vehicle paths is provided. The island shapes have been designed to ensure wheel path turning diagrams of design vehicles can negotiate the curves safely and clear of the islands. Kerbs Kerbs at central and channelling islands are of the semi-barrier type in all project designed intersections. Cross slope at Intersection Maximum cross slope of 0.5% is maintained to drain off surface water effectively from carriageway. The longitudinal gradient of not more than 0.5% at intersection and not steeper than 1.0% (1in100) shall be achieved beyond intersection for a distance of 100m on cross road or minor arm intersecting with project road at major or minor intersections. Traffic Control Devices For both major and minor road intersections, the use of traffic control devices and other road furniture has been considered. The common types of traffic control devices, which are used to reduce accidents and improve flow conditions at junctions, are road markings, road signs and safety railings. These are as per IRC standards and specifications mentioned below: i. ii. iii. iv. IRC: 35-1997 (Code of Practice for Road Markings) IRC: 67-1977 (Code of Practice for Road Signs) IRC: 79-1981 (Recommended Practice for Road Delineators) IRC: 103-1988 (Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities)
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-4
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-5
Intersections
: Stop Lines : Word STOP : Pedestrian Crossing : Approach to Intersection : Direction Arrows : Continuity Lines : Traffic island
Parking
The road marking material will be hot applied thermoplastic reflective as per Clause 803 of MoSRTH Specifications. Traffic Sign (Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory) Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs are provided depending on the situation and function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-1997 guidelines for Road Signs. The different types of road signs are categorized and provided are: i. ii. iii. iv. v. Mandatory / Regulatory Cautionary / Warning Directional Hazard Markers Informatory
The Code of Practice for Road Signs, IRC: 67-1997, is followed for sizes, configuration, colour and location of all road signs and the Clause 801 of MoSRTH Specifications for their construction. Retro-reflectorised type, which is made of high intensity, encapsulated lens types reflective sheeting fixed over aluminium sheeting for a better visibility at night and road users safety. The signs should be placed at right angles to the line of travel of the approaching traffic. Signs relating to parking of vehicles during specified periods must, however, be fixed parallel to the carriageway. These signposts must be installed at an offset distance of 2m from the edge of the carriageway. The cautionary/warning signs are located at distances of 120m in plain and rolling terrain and 60m in hilly terrain in advance of hazard warnings in rural sections of State Highways, 50m in advance of hazard warnings in urban areas. Informatory signs such as advance direction sign boards, etc. are located at specified distances usually at major intersections on appropriate directions of travel. Where light reflection from the sign face is encountered to such an extent as to reduce legibility, the sign should be turned slightly away from the road. On Horizontal curves, the sign should not be fixed normal to the carriageway but the angle of placement should be determined to the course of the approaching traffic.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-6
The retro reflective sheeting used on the sign shall consist of white or coloured sheeting having a smooth outer surface, which has the property of retro-reflection over its entire surface. It shall be weather resistant and show colourfastness. It shall be new and unused and shall no evidence of cracking, scaling, pitting, blistering, edge lifting or curling and shall have negligible shrinkage or expansion. A certificate of having tested the sheeting for these properties in an unprotected outdoor exposure facing the sun for two years and its having passed these tests shall be obtained from a reputed test laboratory. The colour of the sheeting in case of wide-angle prismatic lens shall confirm to the colour requirements determined by instrumental method in accordance with ASTM E-1164 on sheeting applied to aluminium test panels. Computation shall be done in accordance with E-308 for 2-degree observer. In case of Encapsulated lens typesheeting specification shall confirm with MoSRTH, ASTM E-810. Kilometer Stones The details of kilometre stones are in accordance with IRC: 8-1980 guidelines. Both ordinary and fifth kilometre stones are provided as per the schedule given in tender drawings. Kilometre stones are located on the left-hand side of the road as one proceeds from the station from which the kilometre count starts. Kilometre stones shall be fixed at right angles to the centre line of the carriageway. 200m Stones and Boundary Stones The details of 200m stones and boundary stones conform to IRC: 26-1967 and IRC: 25-1967. 200m stones are located on the same side of the road as the kilometre stones. The inscription on the stones shall be the numerals 2, 4, 6 and 8 marked in an ascending order in the direction of increasing kilometrage away from the starting station. The numerals shall be 80mm high. The colour of the numerals shall be black on a white background. Boundary stones shall be located on either side of the road opposite every 200m stone and kilometre stone. In addition these shall be fixed at all angular points of the boundary. Where the boundary is on a curve or the land is of significant value and likely to be encroached upon, the boundary stones, as required, shall be installed at closer intervals. Typical details design of 200m stones are provided in standard highway drawings. The letter RB, indicating Road Boundary, shall be inscribed on each stone and below it the name of the authority in which the road rests i.e., PWD, C&B etc. Delineators and Object Markers Reflective Delineators and Hazard Markers: Delineators and Hazard Markers are provided to guide the road users for the delineation of carriageway or particular topographical features like traffic island at intersection and junctions, sharp horizontal curves and steep gradients higher than 5%. Object markers are used to indicate hazards and obstructions within the vehicle flow path, for example, channelising islands close to the intersections. The design, materials and locations of the road delineators are conforming to the Recommended Practice for Road Delineators - IRC: 79-1989 and relevant drawings.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-7
They are basically driving aids and should not be regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers. Delineators are provided for all curves of radius less than 600m. They are not provided at locations where Chevron signboards are provided. Delineators and object markers are provided as per the details given in the drawings and are provided in accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-1989. Bus Bays Bus bays are proposed as per the recommendations of IRC: 80-1981. The following data was gathered during field visits. i. All though there were considerable through bus traffic movements, the number of buses stopping at existing bus stops was few.
ii. People travelling from villages to nearby towns make use of taxicabs, jeeps and other light commercial vehicles including goods vehicles in preference to buses. iii. The number of trips made by other carriers was greater than those made by buses. iv. Local consultations were held to study the need for bus bays in specific villages by collecting details pertaining to the number of buses, frequency of buses stopping to pick up passengers, duration of bus stops, etc. v. The need for bus bays at religious places, educational institutions, public buildings, intersections of minor roads leading to interior villages, which are not connected to the bus route network, were studied.
With due consideration to the above data, bus bay locations are provided in all the upgradation links as required. The typical bus bay consists of deceleration and acceleration lanes of 45m length with stopping lane of 3.5m wide, 15m long. Adequate arrangements have also been made to drain off surface water. Typical bus bay layout and schedule of locations are included in the Drawings Volume. The Chainage locations of the bus bays are given in Table 7.3. Table 7.3: Schedule of Bus Bays
Busbays Left Start 750 3015 4940 7935 9750 13175 18590 Centre 802.5 3067.5 4992.5 7987.5 9802.5 13227.5 18642.5 End 855 3120 5045 8040 9855 13280 18695 Start 245 3385 4815 8050 10485 13050 18680 Busbays Right Centre 297.5 3437.5 4867.5 8102.5 10537.5 13102.5 18732.5 End 350 3490 4920 8155 10590 13155 18785
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-8
Busbays Left Start 20440 23950 28110 32280 34510 36500 Centre 20492.5 24002.5 28162.5 32332.5 34562.5 36552.5 End 20545 24055 28215 32385 34615 36605 Start 20955 24370 28440 33065 34225 37100
Busbays Right Centre 21007.5 24422.5 28492.5 33117.5 34277.5 37152.5 End 21060 24475 28545 33170 34330 37205
Truck Lay-byes Truck lay bye is provided at location as specified in drawing. The following procedure was adopted in locating the Truck lay-bye: i. Surveys were carried out to identify the places where the trucks are regularly parked along the project roads. These places are usually near check posts, petrol bunks, town approaches, and restaurants/ dhabas and at locations where truck repair facilities were available. Rural sections of highway merely have any such locations. There were no specific parking places for trucks along the project roads. This situation makes the truck drivers park vehicles at various locations in disorder that causes congestion for smooth flow of traffic particularly at town approaches. Local consultations were held at the places of petty repair shops, restaurants/ dhaba etc. and subjective opinion of the drivers regarding necessity of truck lay bye was gathered. Following information was collected during the inventory survey of truck lay-byes: Location, chainage. Timings of opening of shop split hour/continuous. Number of trucks parked during different hours a day (including peak hours) Repair facilities available vulcanising, minor repairs, major repairs Other facilities available rest rooms, dormitory facilities etc. The scenario of existing truck traffic on State Highways is entirely different from that on National Highways as only limited number of vehicles ply on the project roads from time to time and this trend changes during different seasons. The facilities of vulcanising and minor repairs are generally not available at most of the repair shops. Keeping in view all the above considerations, typical truck lay-bye design is proposed. It consists of deceleration and acceleration lane of length 25.0m with central parking area of 50m length and 14m wide with 1.2m wide 7-9
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi. vii.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
raised Kerb Island separating the carriageway and lay-bye. This can accommodate parking space (4.0m x 8.0m) for 13 trucks at an angular parking of 45 degrees. Sufficient working area and space for roadside establishments such as repair shops, vulcanising shops, service centre, spare parts shops, telephone booth and light refreshments with first aid facilities can be provided. viii. Cement concrete pavement is proposed to prevent damage caused by frequent application of brakes and parking of loaded trucks for minor repair works.
Guard posts Guard posts are proposed on embankments of height more than 1.5m, bridge approaches and horizontal curves of radius greater than 170m. The spacing of guard post shall be 1.0m c/c. Typical Guard post consists of pre-cast (M20) CC post of size 150mm diametre and height of 1000mm. They are encased in M15 cement concrete to a depth of 300mm below ground level. Guard posts are painted with alternate black and white reflective paint of 150mm wide bands. Typical details of guard post are provided in standard highway drawings provided. Table 7.4: Location of Guard Posts
START LEFT SIDE END LENGTH (m) 53 60 10 40 49 60 54 68 38 73 35 167 110 20 70 20 927 Total Length of LHS 900 START 1/905 4/350 8/145 11/266 11/711 15/173 15/702 17/826 21/706 29/186 29/258 29/541 39/425 RIGHT SIDE END LENGTH (m) 1/958 4/410 8/180 11/315 11/771 15/227 15/770 17/894 21/779 29/238 29/425 29/675 39/452 53 60 35 49 60 54 68 68 73 52 167 134 27
1/905 1/958 4/350 4/410 7/620 7/630 8/145 8/185 11/266 11/315 11/711 11/771 15/173 15/227 15/702 15/770 17/826 17/864 21/706 21/779 26/545 26/580 29/258 29/425 29/485 29/595 29/620 29/640 40/740 40/810 40/990 41/010 Total Length of LHS
Road Humps and Rumble Strips Road Humps are formed by providing a rounded hump of 3.7m width (17m radius) and 0.10m height for the preferred advisory crossing speed of 25kph for general traffic as per the IRC: 991988 guidelines. The basic material for construction is bituminous concrete formed to required shape. Road humps should be provided on minor roads at intersections of minor roads with major roads, School and Hospital zones. Proper signboards and markings are provided to advise the drivers in advance of the situation. Road humps are extended across carriageway up to the edge of
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-10
paved shoulder. The locations of the road humps are given in Schedule of Drawings separately. The schedule of road humps is presented in Table 7.5. Table 7.5: Schedule of Road Humps
SL.NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 CHAINAGE 1/946 2/538 3/011 5/550 7/205 8/335 11/708 12/800 12/790 15/089 15/846 16/422 18/704 22/635 24/590 25/183 27/127 28/572 29/511 32/518 32/602 36/381 36/748 37/000 37/519 99/00 10/200 13/600 13/700 17/150 17/300 20/750 20/850 34/310 34/355 38/500 38/600 DESCRITPION T-Type T-Type Y-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type T-Type Y-Type Typical 4-Legged T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type T-Type Y-Type Typical 4-Legged Y-Type Y-Type School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone School Zone LHS/RHS LHS RHS LHS LHS LHS RHS LHS LHS RHS RHS RHS LHS RHS LHS Both Side LHS RHS RHS RHS RHS LHS RHS Both Side RHS LHS
Rumble Strips are formed by a sequence of transverse strips laid across a carriageway. Maximum permitted height of 20mm. These rumble devices produce audible and vibratory effects to alert drivers to take greater care and do not normally reduce traffic speeds in themselves. The typical design details of rumble strips proposed are transverse strips of Pre-mix bituminous concrete 500mm wide and overall thickness 20mm laid across a carriageway up to the end of paved shoulder.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-11
There will be 6 such transverse strips spaced at 2.0m c/c. Rumble strips are proposed at: i. Sharp curves with radius less than 170m. ii. Transition zones (speed limit zones). iii. Village/urban approaches. Proper signboards and marking are proposed to advise the drivers in advance of the situation. The locations of the road humps are given in Schedule of Drawings separately. Footpath Barriers Barriers can be used to alter patterns of pedestrian movements as part of any road safety measures. They are used in short lengths in front of school entrances, recreation grounds, and footpaths to prevent haphazard movement of pedestrians. Covered drains of 1.5m wide have been provided at built-up section for the pedestrian movement. Footpath barriers are formed of tubular steel sections (of designated weight in kilograms per running meter) in conformance with IS 1239. These barriers will have overall height of 1.0m above the kerb and length of 2.0m. They are difficult to climb, as there is no horizontal rails more than 100mm above the footway. These barriers are located at an offset of 150mm from the face of the kerb. The standard drawings are presented in Drawing Volume. The location and exact Chainages shall be determined at the stage of construction. The schedule of Pedestrian crossing is presented in Table 7.6. Table 7.6: Schedule of Pedestrian Crossing
School Zone Hospital Zone CHAINAGE 7750 10100 13664 17230 20800 34340 36680 38600 803 3068 4993 7988 9803 13228 18643 20493 28163 32333 34563 36553 298 3438 4868 8103 10538 13103 18733 21008 28493 33118 34278 37153 Bus Bays
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-12
Reflective Pavement Markers (RPM) i. Reflective Pavement Marker (RPM) or road stud is a device, which is bonded to or anchored within the road surface for lane marking and delineation for night time visibility. It reflects incident light in directions close to the direction from which it came. Plastic body of RPM/road stud shall be moulded from ASA (Acrylic Strene Acrylonitrite) or HIPS - (High Impact Polystyrene) or ABS or any other suitable material approved by the Engineer-in-Charge. The markers shall support a load of 13635 Kg tested in accordance with ASTM D4280. Reflective panels shall consist of number of lens containing single or dual prismatic cubes capable of providing total internal reflection of light entering the lens face. Lenses shall be moulded of methyl methecrylate conforming to ASTM D788 or equivalent. Design details, Optical performance details and details of fixing and placement shall be in-accordance with Ministrys letter No.RW/NH-33023 /10/ 97-DO III dated, the 11th June, 1997 on Technical Specifications for Reflective Pavement Markers (Road Studs).
ii.
iii.
iv.
Chevron Sign Boards i. ii. iii. The size of Chevron Signboard has to be 400mm x 550mm. The signboard should be wide-angle micro-prismatic lens. The retro reflective surface after cleaning with soap water and in dry condition shall have the minimum co-efficient of retroreflection (MoSRTH wide 801.3.2 clause) as indicated below for encapsulated lens. Entrance Angle (in deg)
-4 +30 -4 +30
White
250 (430) 150 (235) 95 (250) 65 (170)
Yellow
170 (325) 100 (205) 62 (240) 45 (110)
Green/Red
45 (325) 25 (205) 15 (240) 10 (110)
Blue
20 (20) 11 (11) 7.5 (10) 5.0 (7)
Note: Figure in brackets indicates co-efficient of retro-reflection (Cd/Lux/m2) for wide-angle micro prismatic lens type sheeting as per ASTM E:810 test method. When totally wet, the sheeting shall not show less than 90% of the value of retro reflective indicated in the table above. At the end of 7 years, the sheeting shall retain at least 75% of its original retro reflectance. Chevron sign boards shall be installed at 10m c/c as shown in the drawings at all curves of radius less than 200 m along the outer edge facing the traffic of nearby lane.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-13
traffic signs, road pavement markings, hazards of rash driving etc. Driving during the effect of alcohol and other drugs should be fined and punished by the law. The responsibilities of the State Highway Patrol will be, i. Quick response to move injured persons & disabled vehicles from state highway.
ii. Record and maintain accident database. iii. Impose fine on spot for traffic rule violation.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
7-14
CHAPTER 8
ii.
iii. iv.
v.
vi. vii.
viii.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
iii. iv.
Prepare a schedule of reference dimensions and maintain the markers until the works reach finished formation level and are accepted by the Engineer. Verify the dimensions and levels, shown on the drawings or mentioned in contract documents, on the site and inform the Engineer of any apparent errors or discrepancies. Prepare a profile along the centre line and cross-sections at intervals as specified in the drawings, otherwise as prescribed by the Engineer. Obtain approval of the Engineer to the profile and cross-sections as these form the basis for measurements and payments for various items of work. The work can commence thereafter. The lines and levels of formation, side slopes, drainage works, carriageway and shoulders should be carefully set out and frequently checked, care being taken to ensure that correct gradients and cross-sections are obtained everywhere.
v. vi.
vii.
ii. iii.
8.2.3 Excavation
i. The limits of excavation should be set out true to lines, curves, slopes, grades and sections as shown on the drawings. The work of excavation should be carried out in conformity with the drawings. Undertake stripping of topsoil before excavation if so required under the contract and stack it suitably for reuse. Keep the excavation dry. After excavation, the sides of excavated area should be trimmed and the area contoured to minimize erosion and ponding, allowing natural drainage to take place. In case in-situ soil is to be used for subgrade, loosen the soil and compact to a thickness of 500mm with a suitable roller to 97 per cent modified proctor compaction density.
v.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
8-2
ii.
If the level difference between the existing road surface and the new formation level is more than 1m, the existing surface shall be permitted to stay in place without any modification. Earthwork for high embankment In the case of high embankment, the contractor shall normally use the material from the specified borrow area. In case he desires to use different material for his own convenience, he shall have to carry out necessary soil investigations and redesign the high embankment at his own cost. The contractor shall then furnish the soil test data and design of high embankment for approval of the Engineer, who reserves the right to accept or reject it.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
8-3
8.3
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT All necessary safety measures shall be adopted for safety of moving traffic. The traffic moving on the road should face least disturbances due to construction activities. The safety measures should provide: i. ii. iii. Clear advance warning to road users; Clear demarcated path for movement of vehicles in construction zone; Proper devices to guide road users through Construction and Maintenance Zones.
ii.
iii.
The distance between two work zones should be such that the flow of traffic can return to normal by permitting fast moving traffic to overtake slow moving vehicles for easy dissipation of queuing vehicles.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
8-4
Men at Work/ Go Slow; Road Narrows; No Overtaking; Keep Right (at merging end); Diversion Ahead (for bridgework); Road Closed (for bridgework); Compulsory Keep Left/Right (for bridgework).
ii.
On the half-width of road where work is taking place, at each end of the Works:
1 permanent barrier; 1 flag man controlling successive flows of traffic in alternate directions, if one way trafficking is in operation; Keep Left (at diverging end); Delineators such as Chevron sign boards, traffic cones etc.
iii.
Continuous concrete barriers, permanent barricades, traffic cones and reflective tapes. (On long works sections, intermediate traffic controllers may also be required to transfer Stop/Go instructions. Alternatively portable traffic lights or hand radio sets could be used).
iv.
On the shoulder on the side of the traffic leaving the diversion, Restriction Ends signs should be placed approximately 200 meters beyond the traffic barrier.
8-5
the Detour and Sharp Deviation signs should be used to guide the traffic into the diversion. Hazard markers should be placed at the point where the railing for the cross drainage structures on the diversion starts. ii. Partial Closure for Work on a single Carriageway: Care has to be taken to ensure that traffic is guided from the closed lane in to the operating lane without conflicting with traffic from the opposite direction.
8.4
CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY The traffic management needs to be closely coordinated with the sequence of the construction operations. The ideal condition is that traffic should be diverted to a detour or to separate diversion but when it is not possible then the sequence of construction should be as under for concentric as well as eccentric widening.
Stage 2:
Stage 3: Stage 4:
Stage 5: Stage 6:
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
8-6
Raising half the carriageway by doing earthwork for embankment and subgrade as per para 8.2.4. Execution of granular sub base, sub base and bituminous work along with the shoulders. Refer traffic management drawing in Figure 8.1. Diverting traffic on the newly constructed road. Refer Figure 8.2 for diversion of traffic. Construction of remaining half as per Stage 2 & 3 above.
Stage 2: Stage 3:
8-7
any major repair or reconstruction of cross drainage works. The diversion can be as given in Figure 8.3. The diversion shall be 3.5m carriageway with 1.0m earthern shoulders on each side with following provisions of road crust 100mm WMM, 150mm (compacted) GSB, and premix carpeting. The temporary carriageway must satisfy the following requirements: i. ii. iii. iv. v. It should have smooth horizontal and vertical profile with smooth vertical and horizontal curves; It should not get overtopped by flood or drainage discharges under any conditions; It should have adequate capacity to cater to the expected traffic; It should be dust free and should ensure clear visibility at all times of day and night; and Barricading should be provided to prevent construction material falling on the diversion.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
8-8
1Km
750m
250m
120m
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
DIVERSION AHEAD
8-9
750m
500m
END
250m
125m
125m
250m
500m
750m
WIDENING IN PROGRESS 1Km 1 Km FIGURE 8.2: LAYOUT OF SIGNS AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR CHARGEIN CARRIAGEWAY USAGE
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
END
8-10
1Km
750m
RIVER
CONSTRUCTION ZONE
DIVERSION
WIDENING IN PROGRESS 1Km 1 Km FIGURE 8.3: LAYOUT OF SIGNS AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR ROAD CLOSED WITH A DIVERSION
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
DIVERSION AHEAD
WIDENING IN PROGRESS 1 Km
ROAD CLOSED
DIVERSION
8-11
CHAPTER 9
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
9-1
CHAPTER 10
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
10-1
CHAPTER 11
COST ESTIMATES
11.1 GENERAL The cost estimate for detail engineering report has been framed on the basis of current rate analysis on labour rate and material rate schedule-2006 issued by the OWD. The approximate leads for different construction materials for respective sections were calculated by the field team. The production cost for various materials i.e. GSB, WMM and DBM at site are also calculated. The rate analysis is done using standard data book of MoSRTH. 11.2 METHODOLOGY Estimation of the detailed quantity of each item of works is the important input required for the Cost Estimate. The quantities of the items under Site Clearance, Earth Works, Sub-base and Base Courses, Bituminous/Cement Concrete Courses, Road Junctions, Drainage and Protective Works, Bridges, Culverts and Rehabilitation etc. have been computed based on the design and drawings. After the quantities are computed for each of the work items the amount of each item is evaluated by multiplying the respective quantities with the relevant unit rates and finally the total estimated cost is arrived accordingly. 11.3 BILL OF QUANTITIES The Bill of Quantities for the Item Rate contract was prepared under different Bills. The quantities and unit of the different work items under each bill were calculated based on the estimated quantities. Besides the other relevant information like rate analysis, lead for various materials from different quarry locations were collected, which serves the basic guide for preparation of the tentative cost for all sections. 11.4 UNIT RATES The Unit Rate Analysis has been framed on the basis of the latest MoSRT&H Data Book. 11.4.1 Basic Rates of Material Market Rates of material have been considered invariably. The stone aggregate has been evaluated by way of installing crusher plant and manufacturing the required quantities of the different sizes of aggregate exclusively for use in the project work. This would ensure considerable overall economy when compared with direct purchase of the finished products from the private crusher owners of the area. For HYSD Bar, information on rates has been collected from the stockyard of SAIL/ TISCO located at Bhubaneswar. Likewise the rates for High Tensile steel strands have also been adopted after market inquiry for pre-stressed work.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
11-1
With regard to Bitumen, 60/70 grade is proposed and its rate is collected from the offices of the HPC/ IOC at Bhubaneswar. Bitumen emulsion shall be used for primer coat and tack coat. The rate was also collected by inquiry from the offices of the Petroleum Companies at Bhubaneswar. 11.4.2 Lead of Material Shortest average leads have been adopted in respect of stone aggregate, Moorum, sand etc from the quarries/ sources up to the proposed location of the Hot Mix plant, Pug Mill, Concrete Batching Plant as the Case may be. For HYSD bar, Bitumen and Bitumen Emulsion the leads are from Bhubaneswar, Visakhapatnam, Haldia are taken. Extra lead for the mixed materials from the Hot Mix Plant/ Pug Mill/ Concrete Batching Plant as the case may be to work site is allowed as per MoSRTH Data Book. 11.4.3 Provision of Royalty Royalty has been added to the basic rates of the materials in the Rate Analysis as per prevailing Government Norms. 11.4.4 Carriage Rates of finished Materials The carriage rates of materials, as stipulated in the State Schedule of Rates have been allowed in the analysis. However, in case of the mixed materials from the concerned plants to the workplace overall rate has been considered. The labour rates are taken from SSR-2006 of Orissa state with increase of Rs 15 as discussed with PIU. The machinery cost is taken from the MoSRT&H data book and SSR-2006. 11.5 COST ESTIMATES Detail costs have been worked out for the different items of road works and structures. Estimated total cost of this package is Rs 954.70 millions which includes engineering cost as Rs 753.478 millions. Estimated cost for provisional items, social, environmental and utility shifting costs as Rs 63.20 millions. The General Abstract of cost is appended here with.
Consultancy Service for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Preparation for Proposed Orissa State Road Project
11-2
ABSTRACT OF COST
Description
Site clearance and Dismantling Earth Work Sub-base and base courses Bituminous courses Culverts & Underpasses Bridges Drainage & Protective works Miscellaneous items Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation works Cost of Environmental Implementation Plan Provisional Item SubTotal (A)
Amount in Rupees
8311814.00 85825564.00 159733370.00 186683169.00 83003200.00 24564654.00 108179807.00 34382305.00 8441133.00 21062708.00 30640335.00 750828059.00 140400.00 1685343.60 375000.00 450000.00 2650743.60 753478802.60 7534788.03 7534788.03 768548378.65 122967740.58 891516119.24 48,163,154.00 15,016,561.18 63179715.18 954695834.42
1 2 3 4
Total for Daywork : Labour Total for Daywork : Materials Total for Daywork : Contractor's Equipment Specified Provisional Item Subtotal (B) Subtotal (C=A+B)
1 2
Contigency (D=1% of C) Quality Control (E = 1% of C) Net Total (F = C+D+E) Prorata (G = 16% of F) Grand Total (H = F + G) Add for ( i) Social Cost(LAQ+R&R) (ii) Utility relocation, 2% of A Total (I) Total Civil Construction Cost (I + H)
Detail Quantities BILL NO.1 : SITE CLEARANCE Item No. Description BILL NO.1 : SITE CLEARANCE Cleaning and Grubbing for road land complete as per Technical Specification Clause 201.The abstract area calculated from MX software is mentioned below and the detailed quantity is annexed herewith. Dismantling structures and pavement including disposal of resulting material and/or salvaging useful materials complete as per Technical Specifiction Clause 202 a) Brick/ Stone Structures b) Concrete/Reinforced concrete/ Prestressed concrete structures including cleaning straghtening & cutting of bars and separating them out from RCC/PSC. For Slab Culverts & Box Culverts and Bridges i)P.C.C. ii)R.C.C. c) Dismantalling of Pavement course d) Pipe, guard rail, edging kerbs, masonry parapet, gutters & fencing Hume pipe e) Kerb f) stone pitching g) concrete railing SUB TOTAL BILL NO.2 : EARTH WORKS Roadway excavation necessary for construction of roadway complete as per Technical Specification Clause 301 calculated from Mx software and is annexed herewith. a) Soil b) softrock (blasting not required) (LS) c) Hard rock (blasting required) (LS) 2.02 Construction of embankment with approved material complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts , calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. Cum Cum Cum 438207.85 4494.44 6741.66 28.00 37.00 119.00 12269820.00 166294.00 802258.00 Unit Quantity Rate Amount
1.01
Hectare
69.00
29138.00
2010522.00
1.02
Cum
618.46
112.00
69267.00
Lm Lm Cum Lm
2.01
Cum
100705.46
106.00
10674779.00
Item No. Description 2.03 Construction of subgrade and earthen shoulder with approved material as per drawing complete and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts calculated from MX Software and annexed herewith. 2.04 Construction of granular/gravel shoulders with approved material as per drawing complete and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts Construction of embankment and subgrade with suitable material deposited at site from roadway and drainage excavation all complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts. Loosening and recompacting subgrade in all kinds of soil complete as per Technical Specification Clause 305 Filling of median/island complete as per Technical Specitication Clause 407
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum
337999.00
129.00
43601871.00
Cum
0.00
473.32
0.00
2.05
Cum
43821.00
57.00
2497797.00
2.06
Cum
35375.00
40.00
1415000.00
2.07
Cum
1620.00
120.00
194400.00
2.09
Scarifying the existing bituminous surface layers complete as per Technical Specification Clause 305 calculated from MX Software and annexed herewith. Lime Stabilisation for Improving embankment (Laying and spreading available soil/excavated soil in the embankment on a prepared surface, pulverising, mixing the spread soil in place with rotavator with 3 % slaked lime having minimum content of 70% of CaO, grading with motor grader and compacting with the road roller at OMC to the desired density to form a layer of improved sub grade) as per Technial Specification Clause 402.
Sqm
20241.70
2.00
40483.00
2.10
Sqm 2.11 Providing Geotextiles for improvement of sub-soil strength as per drawing and technical specification. SUB TOTAL
0.00
141.00
0.00
Sqm
0.00
0.00
0.00 71,662,702.00
Description BILL NO.3 : SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSES Construction of Coarse graded Granular Subbase course complete as per Technical Specification clause 401 , calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. Construction of wet mix macadam complete as per Technical Specification clause 406 , calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. SUB TOTAL
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum
130539.61
349.00
45558325.00
3.02
Cum
9494.30
974.00
9247443.00 54,805,768.00
4.01
BILL NO.4 : BITUMINOUS COURSES Providing Primer coat over granular surface complete all as per Technical specification clause 502, calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. Providing Tack coat complete as per Technical Specification clause 503 as calculated from MX software Providing dense bituminous macadamcourse complete as per Technical Specification Clause 507, calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. Providing bituminous concrete wearing course using CRMB-55 complete as per Technical Specification Clause 512, calculated from MX software and annexed herewith. Providing, laying mixed seal surfacing in spur roads complete as per technical specification clause 512. Providing dry lean cement concrete subbase complete as per Technical Specification Clause 601 Providing cement concrete pavement complete as per Technical Specification Clause 602
Sqm
401243.99
11.00
4413684.00
4.02
Sqm
401243.99
4.00
1604976.00
4.03
Cum
27802.47
3881.00
107901381.00
4.04
Cum
16049.76
4374.00
70201648.00
4.05
Sqm
5512.50
88.00
485100.00
4.06
Cum
0.00
1689.00
0.00
4.07
0.00
4176.00
0.00 184,606,789.00
Description BILL NO.5 : CULVERTS AND UNDERPASSES Earthwork in excavation of foundation for structures complete as per drawing and technical specifications clause 304 including all leads and lifts. Earth fill below pitching in quadrant portion with approved material complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts. Providing and filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall etc. and below pipe bed in layers not exceeding 150mm thick including All leads and lifts complete as per drawings, direction of the Engineer and Technical specification clause 304. Providing filtter media behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawing and Technical Specification clause 305. Cement Concrete M-15 grade in levelling course etc. including centering and shuttering all complete as per Drawings and Technical Specification Sections 1500 and 1700. Cement Concrete M-15 grade in substructure & headwall including centering and shuttering all complete as per Drawings and Technical Specification Sections 1500 and 1700. Reinforced cement concrete in all types of culverts as per drawing and technical specification Clause No.1700 & 2300. a) M-20 Grade b) M-25 Grade Reinforced cement concrete M-30 grade in approach slabs including cost of reinforcement all complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700. HYSD bar reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specifications clause 1600
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum
9083.63
31.00
281593.00
5.02
Cum
2318.34
106.00
245745.00
5.03
Cum
3738.63
332.00
1241225.00
5.04
Cum
1945.79
1160.00
2257116.00
5.05
Cum
2221.94
2764.00
6141446.00
5.06
Cum
3312.06
2924.00
9684468.00
5.07
Cum Cum
6035.82 21.50
3845.00 3845.00
23207734.00 82676.00
5.08
Cum
1425.69
5732
8172055.00
5.09
MT 5.10 Providing laying and joining NP-4(I.S 458) hume pipes with culvert complete as per drawing Tech. Specification section2900 and IRC special publication no.13 a) 1m dia. hume pipe in single row b) 1m dia. hume pipe in double row
406.28
42550.00
17287104.00
Rm Rm
850.000 582.500
3362.00 6773.00
2857700.00 3945273.00
Item No. Description 5.11 Providing and laying filter material underneath stone pitching in slopes complete as per drawings and technical specification section 2500. 5.12 Providing and laying stone Pitching on embankment slopes complete as per drawing and technical specification Clause 2504. Providing rubble stone flooring in Cement mortar (1 Cement:3 Sand) and joints complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 1400 and 2500. Providing weep holes in box portion, return wall, wing wall etc. all complete as per drawing ans technical specification clause . 2706. Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level bearings confirming to IRC-83 (para-II) section IX complete with all accessories as oer drawings and technical specification clause 2605
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum
1069.57
1160.00
1240699.00
Cum
2019.85
665.00
1343199.00
5.13
Cum
1448.74
2505
3629103.00
5.14
Nos
6365.20
100.00
636520.00
5.15
Sqm 5.16 Supplying as fixing the following types of expansion joints complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 2600. Reinforced cement concrete railing complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 (Including cost of Reinforcement) Rmt 5.18 Bituminous wearing course 56mm thick comprasing 50mm thick asphaltic concrete in a single layer over Bituminous mastic course 6mm thick with a prime coat complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 and Clause 512. Synthetic enamel painting of culvert no. and span arrangement as per IRC - 7 - 1971 and as directed by the Engineer. SUB TOTAL
83.50
Rmt
1704.00
34.00
57936.00
5.17
1396.38
1143.00
1596062.00
Sqm
6962.50
470.50
3275854.00
5.19
No.
236.00
47.00
11092.00 87,194,600.00
Description BILL NO.6 : BRIDGES Earthwork in excavation of foundation for structures complete as per drawing and technical specification clause 304 including all leads & lift
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum 6.02 Providing and filling foundation and at the back of abutment, wing wall and return wall etc. and below pipe bed in layers not exceeding 150mm thick including including all leads & lifts as per Technical specification Clause 304 and 305. Cum 6.03 Providing Filter media behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawing and technical Specification clause 305 and 2504 Cum 6.04 Cement concrete M-15 grade in levelling course etc including centering and shuttering all complete as per drwaing and Technical specification Section 1500 and 1700. Cement concrete M-15 grade in foundation and substructure etc including centering and shuttering all complete as per drwaing and Technical specification Section 1500 and 1700. Cum 6.06 Reinforced cement concrete in foundation complete as per drawing & Technical specification sections 1700, 2100 & 2200 a) M-20 Grade b) M-25 Grade c) M-30 Grade d) M-35 Grade Reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawing & Technical specification sections 1700, 2100 & 2200 a) M-20 Grade b) M-25 Grade c) M-30 Grade c) M-35 Grade c) M-40 Grade Cum Cum Cum Cum
2218.86
31.00
68785.00
2742.11
332.00
910380.00
186.58
1160.00
216438.00
Cum
102.36
2764.00
282924.00
6.05
509.22
2924.00
1488958.00
6.07
Item No. Description 6.08 Reinforced cement concrete in super structure complete as per drwaing and Technical specification section 1700 & 2200. a) M-25 grade b) M-30 grade 6.09 Prestressed cement concrete in super structure complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 1800 and Clause 2305. M-40 grade 6.10 Reinforced cement concrete railing complete as per drwaing and Technical specification section 2700 (Including cost of Rainforcement) Hand Railing 6.11 Bored cast-in-situ M-35 grade RCC Pile excluding reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specification cl.1100 , 1600 , 1700 and removal of excavated earth with all leads and lifts. A)HYSD bar reinforcement with Anti-corrosive treatment coating complete as per drawing and technical specifications clause 1600 a) in foundation b) in substructure c) in superstructure B)Providing and supplying High Tensile steel strands including all accessories for stressing, stressing operation and grouting complete as per Drawing and Technical Specification Section 1800. 6.13 Providing and fixing elastomeric bearings complete as per Drawing and technical specification 2000. a) Elastomeric bearing b) POT PTFE bearing c) Tar paper bearing Reinforced cement concrete M-30 grade for in approach slabs including cost of reinforcement all complete as per Drawing and Technical specification section 2700.
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum Cum
424.54 261.81
4343.00 4395.00
1843798.00 1150634.00
Cum
0.00
Rmt
30.80
1143.00
35204.00
Rmt
322.80
7661
2472971.00
6.12
Tonne
Tonne
0.00
1.61 50.00
80500.00 3640.00
6.14
Cum
107.10
5732.00
613897.00
Item No. Description 6.15 Bituminous wearing course 56mm thick comprasing 50mm thick asphaltic Concrete in a single layer over Bituminous mastic course 6 mm thick with a prime Coat Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 and Clause 512. 6.16 Providing and fixing Drainage Spouts Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 2705 Providing and laying Stone pitching in slopes complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2500 Providing as laying fitter material underneath Stone pitching in slopes Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2500. Providing weep holes in abutments, wing walls and return walls etc. as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 Providing rubble Stone flooring in Cement mortar (1Cement:3 sand) and joints Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 1400 and 2500 Supplying as fixing the following types of expansion joints Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2600 a)Filler type b) Strip seal type of expansion joint including acceptance testing as Specified, to be installed under Supervision of the specialist manufacturer
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Sqm
1411.49
470.50
664105.00
No
30.00
733.00
21990.00
6.17
Cum
434.65
665.00
289044.00
6.18
Cum
197.91
1208.00
239071.00
6.19
Nos
429.00
100.00
42900.00
6.20
Cum
39.96
665.00
26573.00
6.21
Rm
246.13
34.00
8368.00
Rm 6.22 Synthetic enamel painting of Bridge No and Span arrangements as per IRC-1971 and as directed by Engineer Carrying and Confirmatory bores up to required depth as locations of bridges as directed be Engineer complete in all respects handling testing as per Technical Specification Section 2400 and interpretation of the bore data and presentation of the results a) In all types of soil (except rock) I) depth from 0m to 10m ii) depth from 10m to 20m
24.00
11931.00
286344.00
No
20.00
47.00
940.00
6.23
Lm Lm
120.00 60.00
400.00 450.00
48000.00 27000.00
Item No.
Description iii) depth from 20m to 30m b) In soft rock I) depth from 0m to 5m ii) depth from 5m to 10m Providing and painting of flood gauge on substructure is fall height and 500mm width as per direction as the Engineer Providing HDPE Service pipe as approved quality in footpath as per drawing and direction of the Engineer Plastering with cement mortar (1:3 ) on brick work in sub-structure as per Technical Specifications Clause 1300 & 2200. Earth fill below pitching in quadrant portion with approved material complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 305 with all leads and lifts. Sand Filling in Foundation Trenches as per Drawing & Technical Specification Clause 304. PCC in flooring as per Drawing & Technical Specification Clause 1500, 1700 & 2100. a) M-15 b) M-20
Unit Lm Lm Lm
6.24
Rm
45.00
830.00
37350.00
6.25
Rm
510.40
300.00
153120.00
6.26
Sqm
0.00
583
0.00
6.27
Cum
1340.85
106
142130.00
6.28
Cum
0.00
294
0.00
6.29
Cum Cum
93.24 31.08
2764 3206
257715.00 99642.00
6.30
Provision of an Reinforced cement concrete crash barrier at the edges of the road, approaches to bridge structures and medians, constructed with M-40 grade concrete with HYSD reinforcement conforming to IRC:21 and dowel bars 25 mm dia, 450 mm long at expansion joints filled with pre-moulded asphalt filler board, keyed to the structure on which it is built and installed as per design given in the enclosure to MOST circular No. RW/NH - 33022/1/94-DO III dated 24 June 1994 as per dimensions in the approved drawing and at locations directed by the Engineer, all as specified
Lm SUB TOTAL BILL NO.7 : RETAINING WALL, DRAINAGE AND PROTECTIVE WORKS Retaining Wall
255.20
2237
570882.00 23,880,803.00
7.01
Item No. Description Earthwork in excavation for foundation complete (a) as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 304 in Retaining wall for high embankment stretches (b) Back filling behind wing wall with selected imported granular material of apporved quality complete as per drawing and Technical
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum
1663.20
31.00
51559.00
Cum ( c) Filter medium behind wing wall complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clauses 305 & 2504 Plain cement concrete M -15 in foundation levelling course etc. including centering and shuttering all complete as per drawing and Technical Clauses 1500 & 1700 Cement concrete M -25 for reinfoced concrete in foundation including centering and shuttering all complete as per drawing and Technical Clauses 1500 &1700 Cement concrete M -25 for reinfoced concrete in substructure including centering and shuttering all complete as per drawing and Technical Clauses 1500 &1700 providing steel reinforcement (HYSD) for retaining wall complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1600 Reinforced cement concrete railing of grade M30 complete as per drawings and Technical specifications section 2700 (including cost of reinforcement) Providing weep holes in retaining wall complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 2700 Providing and laying stone pitching on embankment slopes as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 2504 Near Bridge approaches where separate embankment exists Providing and laying filter material underneath stone pitching on embankment slopes as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 2504 Cum
1195.92
368.00
440099.00
Cum
2112.00
1160.00
2449920.00
(d)
Cum
138.60
2924.00
405266.00
(e)
Cum
0.00
3626.00
0.00
(f)
Cum
963.71
3845.00
3705465.00
(g)
Cum
57.82
42550.00
2460352.00
(h)
Lm
440.00
1143.00
502920.00
(I)
No.
880.00
100.00
88000.00
7.02
Cum
738.000
665.00
490770.00
7.03
369.000
1208.00
445752.00
Item No. Description Turfing side slopes of main road and service 7.04 road with grass sods complete as per Technical Specification Clause 307 7.05 Constructing lined surface drains/ sub surface drains to the required lines and grades as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 309
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Sqm
160058.000
12.00
1920696.00
Lm 7.06 Constructing box type drains to the required lines and grades as per drawing and technical specification SUB TOTAL
22980.000
3718.00
85439640.00
Lm
1120.000
8094.00
9065280.00 107,465,719.00
8.01
BILL NO-8 : MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. Providing and laying plain cement concrete kerb as per drawing and Technical Specifications Clauses 408 and section 1700. Providing service ducts with 150mm dia GI pipes over concrete base under existing and proposed carrigeways including cutting of trenches through existing roadway and reinstatement of the same as per design and specification of new construction (but exclud Providing and fixing RCC boundry posts complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 806 ( including cost of reinforcement ) Providing and fixing RCC/PCC hectometre, Kilometre and 5th kilometre stones complete as per Technical Specification Clause 804 (including cost of reinforcement) a) No of (200) Hectometre Stone b) No of Kilometre stone c) No. of 5th Kilometre Stone
Lm
336.483
148.00
49799.00
8.02
Lm
378.000
1669.00
630882.00
8.03
No
449.000
260.00
116740.00
8.04
No No No
8.05
Constructing footpath/ paved separator / passenger platform / paved part of medians and islands complete a spe drawing and Technical Specifications Clause 409 and 407 For Toll Plaza Providing passenger shelters for Bus Bays as per drawing and Technical Specifications Section 1700.
sqm
3693.000
2000.00
7386000.00
8.06
No
26.000
80000.00
2080000.00
Item No. Description 8.07 Construction of temporary diversion including Cross drainage works where necessary and maintenance thereof including traffic control and safety complete as per Technical Specification Clause 112. 8.08 (I) Pavement marking with hot applies thermoplastic paints confirming to ASTMD86 / BS 3262-Part as per drawing and Technical specifications Clause 803. a) Lane line / Edge marking b) Directional arrows and lettering etc.
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Lm
5160.000
1498.00
7729680.00
sqm No
11746.000 192.000
595.00 39.00
6988870.00 7488.00
8.09
Supplying and fixing sign boards complete as per Technical Specifications Clause 801 and as directed by Engineer. Including the cost of Posts,Fitting & fixing. Sheeting will be retro reflective type of high intensively grade and messages / boarders wil Informatory Signs (i) Facility Information (800 x 600)mm (ii) Direction Signs (1200 x 700 mm) (iii) Advance Direction (size 1800 x 1200mm) , Re-Assurance Sign (1800 X 1200 mm) , Destination Sign (1500 X 900 mm) , Place Identification (1500 X 900 mm) , (iv) Route Marker Sign (450mm x 600mm) (v) Other Informatory Signs (2100mm x 1500mm) CAUTIONARY SIGNS triangular 900mm side MANDATORY SIGNS Circular 600mm dia Octagaon 900 mm height Triangular 900 mm side Providing & fixing retro - reflectorised road delinators complete as per drawing , Technical specifications clause 805 and as directed by Engineer ( I ) Roadway delinator ( ii ) Hazard Marker ( iii ) Object Marker No No No 391.000 16.000 26.000 787.00 787.00 787.00 307717.00 12592.00 20462.00
(a)
No No No No No No No No No No No No
10.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 1.000 4.000 2.000 20.000 70.000 85.000 121.000
2880.00 8325.00 14256.00 14256.00 12256.00 12256.00 3003.00 14256.00 3574.00 3096.00 5869.00 3574.00
28800.00 16650.00 14256.00 14256.00 24512.00 12256.00 12012.00 28512.00 71480.00 216720.00 498865.00 432454.00
(b) ( c)
8.10
8.11
Providing and fixing RCC Guard post complete including end anchorage as per drawing and Technical Specifications Clause 810 No. 949.000 323.00 306527.00
Description Supply of colour record photographs negative and two colour prints therefrom mounted in album as per Technical Specifications Clause 125 As per requirements
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
No
500.000
5.00
2500.00
8.13 Supply of additional prints of coloured photographs referred to above as per Technical Specifications Clause 125 As per requirements 8.14 Supply of colour video cassette records during construction as per Technical Specifications Clause 126 As per requirement Providing rumble strips complete as per drawing and technical specification. Providing road hump complete as per drawing and technical specification. Providing toll plaza as per drawing and technical specification. providing utility duct across the road in specified locations as per the schedule mentioned in drawing SUB TOTAL
No
800.000
5.00
4000.00
set
2.000
200.00
400.00
8.15
No.
12.000
5521.00
66252.00
8.16
No.
39.000
13808.00
538512.00
8.17
No.
1.000 1170506.00
1170506.00
8.18
No.
0.000
0.00
0.00 28,883,762.00
BILL NO.9 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REHABILITATION 9.01 Carrying out routine maintenance of Highway as per Technical Specifications Clause 3002 and as per direction of the Engineer (excluding Km-month bituminous work) Carrying out treatment and repairs to pot-holes and any necessary patching to the existing bituminous carraigeway surfacing as per Technical Specification Clause 3004 as per direction of the Engineer Providing and laying reinforced Cement Concrete of grade M- 30 in railings including dismentalling of damaged railings, straightening and cleaning of the existing reinforcement as required Complete as per drawing and Specification Sections 1500,1600,1700,2200 & 2800. Cum 24.888 2323.00 57814.24
576.000
1500.00
864000.00
9.02
Sqm
8000.000
73.00
584000.00
9.03
Item No. Description 9.04 Plain Cement Concrete M- 20 grade for extension of masonary/ P.C.C. Abutment/Pile, foundation including cleaning of dismetalled face of existing structure and applying a coat of Cement slurry, costin fresh Concrete against the old Concrete face including cost of all materials, form work, centering , staging during all complete as per Technical Specification Sections 2100,2200 and 2300
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Cum 9.05 Removal of damaged expansion joint Complete and replacement with steel plate sliding expansion joint as per drawing as Technical Specification Sections 2600 & 2800 Replacement of existing wearing coat by Bituminous wearing course56mm thick comprasing 50mm thick asphaltic Concrete in a single layer over Bituminous mastic course 6 mm thick with a prime Coat Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 and Clause 512. Reinforced Cement Concrete M- 30 grade approach slabs including cost of reinforcements Complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 2700 Cement Concrete M-15 grade levelling Course below approach Slabs complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Section 1700 SUB TOTAL BILL NO. - 10 : PROVISIONAL ITEMS
0.000
3392.00
0.00
Lm
68.200
1659.00
113143.80
9.06
Sqm
37.969
527.50
20028.52
9.07
Cum
0.000
5732.00
0.00
9.08
Cum
0.000
2924.00
0.00 1638987.00
10.01 Cutting of trees including cutting of trunks, branches and removal of stumps including stacking of serviceable material within a lead of 1000 metres and earthfilling in the depression/pit a) Girth From 300mm to 600mm b) Girth From 600mm to 900mm c) Girth From 900mm to 1800mm d) Girth From 1800mm to Above 10.02 A) Plantation of trees B) Planting of plants & shurbs in median/ verges No No No No No Lm 400.000 275.000 150.000 90.000 9150.000 25000.000 80.00 162.00 285.00 515.00 25.00 12.00 32000.00 44550.00 42750.00 46350.00 228750.00 300000.00
Item No. Description 10.03 Providing and installing Telephone connection with STD facility 10.04 Boring for soil investigation including conducting necessary tests and preparation of report, as per direction of the Engineer and Technical Specification Clause 2400. 10.05 Co-ordination for Shifting of Utilities as per Technical Specification Clause 110 Total project length 10.06 Construction of building (plinth area 9 sq m.) and installation of weigh bridge including arrangement for electric supply, all electrical items like lights, exhaust fans, sockets, receptacles and complete wiring with necessary earthing etc. complete as directed by Engineer.
Unit No
Quantity 0.000
Rate 2000.00
Amount 0.00
Lm
0.00
400.00
0.00
Km
0.00
2000.00
0.00
No 10.07 Providing and fixing Pedestrian guard rails in 2m and 1m modules including painting wrth approved paint complete as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 803,1008,1300 & 1700 SUB TOTAL BILL NO. 12 : DAYWORKS 1. Labour D101 D I02 D103 D104 D105 D106 D107 D108 D109 D110 Labour Mason Carpenter Steelworker Erector Driver for vehicle up to 10 tons Operator for excavator, dragline, shovel or crane Operator for tractor with dozer blade or ripper Operator grader Operator in other construction equipment Chowkidars for watch & ward Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour
100.00
40500.00
4050000.00
Lm
0.00
3000.00
0.00 4744400.00
26000 5000 2000 7000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 45000 110000.00
D201
2.Material Cement, ordinary Portland or equivalent in bags conforming to IS:269:1989 and IS 455:1989 HYSD reinforcing bars upto 25 mm dia conforming to IS:1786:1989 Bricks of class designation 75 as per IS:1077:1992
Per Mt
20
4325.00 86500
D202 D203
5 500
Item No. Description D204 Anti Corrosive Bituminous paint D205 Enamel Paint of any shade & colour (IS:29321964 & IS 137-1975) D206 Coarse Sand as per IS 1542 D207 R.R. Stone for masonry D208 Crusher broken stone aggregates up to 25 mm nominal size D209 Crusher broken stone aggregates Above 25 mm nominal size D210 Portable water at site
Unit Per Lit Per Lit Per Cum Per Cum Per Cum Per Cum Per 1000 ltr
D301 0.1 0.2 0.3 D302 0.1 0.2 0.3 D303 0.1 0.2 D304 D305 D306 D307
3.Constructional Plant. Excavator, face shovel, or dragling: Up to and including 1 m3 Over 1 m to 2 m 3 Over 2 m Tractor, including bull or angle dozer: Up to and including 150 kW Over 150 kW to 200 kW Over 200 kW to 250 kW Tractor with ripper: Up to and including 200 kW Over 200 kW to 250 kW Motor grader Crane- 5 tonne Diesel Road Roller, or Vibratory Compactor upto 10 t Trucks, or Truck tipper, or Truck with mounted water tank or truck with crane for removal of accidental vehicles. Tractor with trolley, or tractor with water tanker trailer, tractor with ripper Tractor with hydraulic scraper (a) upto 25 HP (b) For 25-40 HP
3 3
Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour
50 30 10 50 30 10 30 10 40 40 40 100
840 840 840 234 234 234 252 252 1545 230 802 200 20000 42000 25200 8400 11700 7020 2340 7560 2520 61800 9200 32080
D308
40 30 20
D309
Bitumen mixture (10-14 Cft.) C.C Mix tyre (10-14 Cft.) D310 Water pumping sets mounted on trolley (diesel driven)with inlet & outlet pipes. a) Sets up to 10 HP b) Sets 11 to 20 HP c) Sets above 20 HP D311 Generator sets mounted on trolley a) Sets upto 5 Kva b) Sets 5-15 Kva D312 Mobile Crane / Power winch D313 Bull Dozer 100/110 Hp D314 Plate compactors
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Item No. Description D315 Jack hammers for dismantling D316 Utility Vehicles D317 Mini Hot Mix Plant (5TPH)
Quantity 10 10 10