Raise Wages, Not Walls
Raise Wages, Not Walls
TODAY'S PAPER
VIDEO
MOST POPULAR
TIMES TOPICS
dvc1337...
Help
WORLD
U.S.
N.Y. / REGION
BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
SCIENCE
HEALTH
SPORTS
OPINION
ARTS
STYLE
TRAVEL
JOBS
REAL ESTATE
AUTOS
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Log in to see what your friends are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | Whats This?
RECOMMEND TWITTER LINKEDIN E-MAIL PRINT REPRINTS
THERE are two approaches to illegal immigration currently being debated in Congress. One, supported by the House, emphasizes border control and law enforcement, including a wall along the Mexican border and increased border patrols. The other, which is supported by the Bush administration and has been passed by the Senate, relies on employers to police the workplace. Both proposals have serious flaws.
"Every time I read a new proposal from a politician for what the government should do to handle immigration, I think we've hit bottom. But then I'm afraid we haven't. ..."
California Insider
July 26, 9:02 AM
SHARE As opponents of the House plan have rightly pointed out, walls rarely work; illegal immigrants will get around them one way or another. Unless we erect something akin to the Berlin Wall, which would cost billions to build and police, a barrier on the border would be monitored by largely symbolic patrols and easily evaded.
"This is another way of saying that raising the minimum wage hurts lowskilled workers by denying them the opportunity to grab hold of the first rung of the economic ladder. ..."
Marginal Revolution
July 26, 6:14 AM
"The minimum wage creates unemployment among the low-skilled. As a result, the minimum wage tends to create disproportionate unemployment among teenagers and young African Americans. ..."
ParaPundit
July 26, 0:21 AM
The Senate approach is more realistic but it, too, has problems. It creates a temporary worker program but requires employers first to attempt to recruit American workers to fill job openings. It allows for more border fencing, but makes no effort to disguise the basic futility of the enterprise. Instead, it calls on employers to enforce immigration laws in the workplace, a plan that can only succeed through the creation and distribution of a costly national identification card. A national ID card raises serious questions about civil liberties, but they are not the sole concern. The cost estimates for producing and distributing a counterfeitproof card for the roughly 150 million people currently in the labor force and the millions more who will seek work in the near future extend into the billions of dollars. Employers would have to verify the identity of every American worker, otherwise the program would be as unreliable as the one in place now. Anyone erroneously denied a card in this bureaucratic labyrinth would be unemployable. There is a simpler alternative. If we are really serious about turning back the tide of illegal immigration, we should start
MOST EMAILED
17
2.
RETIRING
As Living Standards Fall for Seniors, Some See Signs of Silver Revolution 3.
N.F.L. ROUNDUP
Receiver Sanders Joins the Broncos FreeAgency Haul 4. Ukraine Premier Makes Plea at the U.N. 5. Backstrom to Receive Medal 6. China Snubs U.N.s North Korea Report 7.
"The economic downside for the economy as a whole would be fairly small. ..."
No More Apples
July 25, 18:42 PM AM
"Now here's the thing that they didn't quite say. By raising the minimum wage the onus is put on employers
"But illegal immigrants work illegally and aren't paid the minimum wage -- only legal workers are. ..."
JustOneMinute
July 25, 15:05 PM AM
by raising the minimum wage from $5.15 per hour to something closer to $8. The Massachusetts legislature recently voted to raise the state minimum to $8 and California may soon set its minimum even higher. Once the minimum wage has been significantly increased, we can begin vigorously enforcing the wage law and other basic labor standards. Millions of illegal immigrants work for minimum and even sub-minimum wages in workplaces that dont come close to meeting health and safety standards. It is nonsense to say, as President Bush did recently, that these jobs are filled by illegal immigrants because Americans wont do them. Before we had mass illegal immigration in this country, hotel beds were made, office floors were cleaned, restaurant dishes were washed and crops were picked by Americans. Americans will work at jobs that are risky, dirty or unpleasant so long as they provide decent wages and working conditions, especially if employers also provide health insurance. Plenty of Americans now work in such jobs, from mining coal to picking up garbage. The difference is they are paid a decent wage and provided
8.
"I'm guessing any conservative economist who predicted employment contraction of that magnitude following a $3 hike in the minimum wage would get roundly blasted as an alarmist wingnut and shill for business. ..."
Neuticles aren!t funny
July 24, 21:50 PM AM
"Won't the effect actually be to incentivize additional 'off the books' employees at subminimum wages? ..."
benefits for their labor. However, Americans wont work for peanuts, and these days the national minimum wage is less than peanuts. For full-time work, it doesnt even come close to the poverty line for an individual, let alone provide a family with a living wage. It hasnt been raised since 1997 and isnt enforced even at its currently ridiculous level. Yet enforcing the minimum wage doesnt require walling off a porous border or trying to distinguish yesterdays illegal immigrant from tomorrows guest worker. All it takes is a willingness by the federal government to inspect workplaces to determine which employers obey the law. Curiously, most members of Congress who take a hard line on immigration also strongly oppose increasing the minimum wage, claiming it will hurt businesses and reduce jobs. For some reason, they dont seem eager to acknowledge that many of the jobs they claim to hold dear are held by the same illegal immigrants they are trying to deport. But if we want to reduce illegal immigration, it makes sense to reduce the abundance of extremely low-paying jobs that fuels it. If we raise the minimum wage, its possible some low-end jobs may be lost; but more Americans would also be willing to work in such jobs, thereby denying them to people who arent supposed to be here in the first place. And tough enforcement of wage rules would curtail the growth of an underground economy in which both illegal immigration and employer abuses thrive. Raising the minimum wage and increasing enforcement would prove far more effective and less costly than either proposal currently under consideration in Congress. If Congress would only remove its blinders about the minimum wage, it may see a plan to deal effectively with illegal immigration, too.
Michael S. Dukakis, the governor of Massachusetts from 1975 to 1979 and from 1983 to 1991, is a professor of political science at Northeastern University. Daniel J. B. Mitchell is a professor of management and public policy at the University of California at Los Angeles.
Ads by Google
what's this?
dotellall.com
A version of this op-ed appeared in print on July 25, 2006, on page A19 of the New York edition with the headline: Raise Wages, Not Walls.
www.lumosity.com
Home
World
U.S.
N.Y. / Region
Business Privacy
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
Opinion
Arts
Style
Travel RSS
Jobs
Real Estate
Autos
Your Ad Choices
Terms of Service
Terms of Sale
Corrections
Help
Contact Us
Work for Us