Senator Honasan questioned the validity of an investigation against him by the Department of Justice, arguing that the circular granting them investigation powers was not properly published. However, the court ruled that the circular did not need to be published because it did not prescribe penalties or regulate the public. Prior cases established that only circulars with penal provisions or mandatory regulations require publication. The circular was an internal document between the DOJ and Ombudsman outlining their respective investigation authorities, not regulating the public. Therefore, publication was not necessary and the investigation was valid.
Senator Honasan questioned the validity of an investigation against him by the Department of Justice, arguing that the circular granting them investigation powers was not properly published. However, the court ruled that the circular did not need to be published because it did not prescribe penalties or regulate the public. Prior cases established that only circulars with penal provisions or mandatory regulations require publication. The circular was an internal document between the DOJ and Ombudsman outlining their respective investigation authorities, not regulating the public. Therefore, publication was not necessary and the investigation was valid.
Senator Honasan questioned the validity of an investigation against him by the Department of Justice, arguing that the circular granting them investigation powers was not properly published. However, the court ruled that the circular did not need to be published because it did not prescribe penalties or regulate the public. Prior cases established that only circulars with penal provisions or mandatory regulations require publication. The circular was an internal document between the DOJ and Ombudsman outlining their respective investigation authorities, not regulating the public. Therefore, publication was not necessary and the investigation was valid.
The Panel of the Investigating Prosecutors of the Department of Justice
Facts: An affidavit-complaint was filed before the DOJ by Mantillano charging Senator Honasan and others for the offense of coup detat. Consequently Honasan questioned the OMB-DOJ Circular which according to Honasan the source of the purported power of the DOJ to conduct preliminary investigation,since there was no publication of the said circular. Issue: Whether or not there is a need of publication. Held: Petitioner's contention is not plausible. In the case of People vs. Que Po Lay the court ruled that only circulars and regulations which prescribe a penalty for its violation should be published before becoming effective, this, on the general principle and theory that before the public is bound by its contents, especially its penal provision, a law, regulation or circular must first be published and the people officially and specifically informed of said contents and its penalties: said precedent, to date, has not yet been modified or reversed. OMB-DOJ Joint Circular No. 95-001 DOES NOT contain any penal provision or prescribe a mandatory act or prohibit any, under pain or penalty. In the case of Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 453 (1986), the Honorable Court ruled that: Interpretative regulations and those merely internal in nature, that is, regulating only the personnel of the administrative agency and not the public, need not be published. Neither is publication required of the so-called letters of instructions issued by administrative superiors concerning the rules or guidelines to be followed by their subordinates in the performance of their duties.OMB-DOJ Joint Circular No. 95-001 is merely an internal circular between the DOJ and the Office of the Ombudsman, outlining authority and responsibilities among prosecutors of the DOJ and of the Office of the Ombudsman in the conduct of preliminary investigation. OMB-DOJ Joint Circular No. 95-001 DOES NOT regulate the conduct of persons or the public, in general. Accordingly, there is no merit to petitioner's submission that OMB-DOJ Joint Circular No. 95-001 has to be published. 14