CHED Powerpoint
CHED Powerpoint
Higher Education
Patricia B. Licuanan, Ph.D.
Chairperson
Commission on Higher Education
Perspectives on Philippine higher education
Higher education landscape
Critical areas of concern
Key Result Areas
Basic education graduates and their impact on higher education
CHEDs K to 12 efforts
Implications of the K to 12 Program for higher education
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
Perspectives on
Philippine Higher Education
PHILIPPINE HIGHER EDUCATION
Thrusts
Expanded and enhanced career and life chances
and choices for students
Higher education and higher education
institutions in the full service of national
development
PHILIPPINE HIGHER EDUCATION
Strategic roles in national development
Instrument for poverty alleviation
Vehicle for technologically-driven national
development and global competitiveness
PHILIPPINE HIGHER EDUCATION
Contribution to poverty alleviation
instruction
research
extension
capacity
opportunity
POOR
PHILIPPINE HIGHER EDUCATION
Contribution to economic development
Human capital formation
Services sector
Business processing outsourcing
Technologically-driven national competitiveness
High-level scientific and technologically-oriented professionals
Human resource for research, development and innovation
Higher Education Landscape
Number of Higher Education Institutions by Type
Institutional Type/AY 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10
2010/11
Total HEIs (excluding SUCs campuses) 1,701 1,741 1,792
1,823
Total HEIs (including SUCs campuses) 2,034 2,074 2,180
2,247
Public 201 205 219
219
State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) 110 110 110 110
SUCs Campuses 333 333 388 424
Local Universities and Colleges (LUCs) 75 79 93 93
Others (include OGS, CSI, Special HEI) 16 16 16 16
Private 1,500 1,536 1,573
1,604
Sectarian 300 302 322 334
Non-Sectarian 1,200 1,234 1,251 1, 270
LUZON
VISAYAS
MINDANAO
Distribution of Higher Education
Institutions (HEIs)
Public = 643 (29%)
Private = 1,604 (71%)
Total = 2,247
(including satellite campuses)
Distribution of students
Public = 1.19M (40%)
Private = 1.74M (60%)
Total = 2.9M
MAPPING OF HEIs
Critical Areas of Concern
LACK OF OVERALL VISION, FRAMEWORK, PLAN FOR
HIGHER EDUCATION
DETERIORATING QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
LIMITED ACCESS TO QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION
Proliferation of HEIs and programs
Skills and Jobs Mismatch
Oversubscribed and Undersubscribed Programs
LACK OF OVERALL VISION, FRAMEWORK AND PLAN
Declining Performance of Graduates
Inadequate Faculty Credentials and Facilities
Lack of Accreditation of HEIs and Programs
Unplanned Expansion
Declining Global Competitiveness
DETERIORATING QUALITY
Low Participation and Completion Rate
Increasing Costs
Limited Student Assistance Programs
LIMITED ACCESS
Key Result Areas
KEY RESULT AREAS
Rationalization of Higher
Education
Improving Quality and
Standards
Rapid, equitable and
sustained economic growth
Increasing Access to Quality HE
Transparency and
Accountability
Organizational Development
Poverty reduction and
empowerment of the poor
Anti-
corruption/transparent,
accountable and
participatory governance
Developing typology of HEIs
Amalgamation of HEIs
Moratorium on new HEIs and programs
Harmonization of public and private HEIs
K to 12
RATIONALIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Quality Assurance
Phase-out/ Closure of substandard programs
Compliance with international standards
Faculty Development/ HEIs Management
Development Programs
IMPROVING QUALITY AND STANDARDS
Centers of Excellence (COEs) / Centers of
Development (CODs)
Zonal and Regional Research Centers established
and supported
National Universities and Colleges for
Agriculture and Fisheries (NUCAFs)/
Provincial Institutes of Agriculture and
Fisheries (PIAFs)
IMPROVING QUALITY AND STANDARDS
Student Financial Assistance Program (STUFAP)
Comprehensive study on all publicly funded
student financial assistance
INCREASING ACCESS TO QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION
Basic Education Graduates and Their
Impact on Higher Education
Low completion rate in higher education
BASIC EDUCATION GRADUATES AND THEIR IMPACT
ON HIGHER EDUCATION
Grade 1 pupils
100
finish Grade 6
34
dropout
66
enroll in 1st year HS
8
OSY
58
finish high school
15
dropout
43
23 enroll in HE, 10 TVET
10
OSY
33
14 graduate in HE, 7 TVET
12
dropout
21
Graduates who are ill-prepared for higher
education and employment
Human development issues
Filipino graduates not recognized abroad
Misperception of basic education
BASIC EDUCATION GRADUATES AND THEIR IMPACT
ON HIGHER EDUCATION
CHEDs K to 12 Efforts
Development of College Readiness Standards
Curriculum Review and Enhancement
Teacher Training
CHEDS K TO 12 EFFORTS
Creation of K to 12 Coordinating Committee,
Task Forces, etc.
Stakeholder Consultations
K to 12 Information, Education and
Communication
CHEDS K TO 12 EFFORTS
Implications of the K to 12 Program for
Higher Education
High school graduates better prepared for
higher education
Better mastery of basics
Remedial courses no longer necessary
High school graduates better prepared for
work
More graduates will go directly to work
Development of a National Qualifications
Framework
IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Development of a Revised General Education
Curriculum
Possible shortening of college curriculum
Teacher Education
IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Some Issues
Enrollment gap during transition years
Schedule for implementation
Readiness of system
Political implications
IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Conclusion
THANK YOU!