This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by Willy M. Boyalo's legal counsel in his case for legal separation from his wife, Michelle P. Boyalo. Willy alleges that Michelle committed adultery and had an illicit relationship with Jose M. Santos. Willy claims he has photographic evidence of Michelle and Jose engaging in sexual intercourse in Willy and Michelle's marital home. The brief outlines the facts of the case, proposed stipulations of fact, a list of documentary evidence, an abstract of witness testimonies, and the number of witnesses to be presented. It asserts the applicable laws are provisions of the Philippine Family Code and the main issue is whether Willy and Michelle should be legally separated due to Michelle
This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by Willy M. Boyalo's legal counsel in his case for legal separation from his wife, Michelle P. Boyalo. Willy alleges that Michelle committed adultery and had an illicit relationship with Jose M. Santos. Willy claims he has photographic evidence of Michelle and Jose engaging in sexual intercourse in Willy and Michelle's marital home. The brief outlines the facts of the case, proposed stipulations of fact, a list of documentary evidence, an abstract of witness testimonies, and the number of witnesses to be presented. It asserts the applicable laws are provisions of the Philippine Family Code and the main issue is whether Willy and Michelle should be legally separated due to Michelle
This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by Willy M. Boyalo's legal counsel in his case for legal separation from his wife, Michelle P. Boyalo. Willy alleges that Michelle committed adultery and had an illicit relationship with Jose M. Santos. Willy claims he has photographic evidence of Michelle and Jose engaging in sexual intercourse in Willy and Michelle's marital home. The brief outlines the facts of the case, proposed stipulations of fact, a list of documentary evidence, an abstract of witness testimonies, and the number of witnesses to be presented. It asserts the applicable laws are provisions of the Philippine Family Code and the main issue is whether Willy and Michelle should be legally separated due to Michelle
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Banch !" #ue$on Cit% WILLY M. BOYALO Petitione& ' (esus ' CI)IL CA*E NO+ MICHELLE P. BOYALO, ,o- LEGAL *EPARATION Respondent& . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . PRE-TRIAL BRIEF PETITIONER b% the undesigned counsel and unto this /onoable Cout 0ost espectfull% states- *TATE1ENT O, T/E ,ACT* AN2 O, T/E CA*E This is an action fo Legal *epaation unde paagaph 3"4 Aticle 55 of the ,a0il% Code of the Philippines+ Petitione alleges in his Petition& (i$- 6+ Petitione and Respondent ae husband and 7ife& ha(ing been legall% 0aied on *epte0be 8& 9::5 befoe Re(+ Nicano T+ )ictoino& Paish Piest of *t+ Pete Chuch& #ue$on& Cit%+ 1achine Cop% of the 1aiage Cetificate& dul% authenticated b% the National *tatistics Office and a pinted cop% of thei 7edding pictue ae heeb% attached and 0a;ed as Anne. <A= and Anne. <B=& especti(el% and 0ade an integal pat heeof> 9+ Neithe the Petitione no the Respondent ac?uied an% popet% befoe thei 0aiage> @+ The Petitione and Respondent did not e.ecute an% penuptial agee0ent> A+ Afte thei 0aiage& Petitione bought a houseat Bloc; 9@ Lot 6" 6A& Bagu0ba%an *teet& #ue$on Cit% fo thei pe0anent esidence and as thei conBugal ho0e and funished it 7ith all the co0fots 7ell 7ithin the 0eans of heein Petitione> 5+ At the stat of thei 0aiage& Petitione 7as led to belie(e b% Respondent of he total concen& lo(e and de(otion+ 8+ Out of thei 0aiage& no child 7as bon due to RespondentCs 0edical condition& 7hich 7as ;no7n to Petitione and 7hich he 7illingl% accepted> D+ Petitione 7as e0plo%ed as an O(eseas ,ilipino Eo;e 3O,E4 in England& he 7o;ed in ABC2 Co0pan% as aTaino and Ad(ise fo Ol%0pic Athletes& 7hile Respondent 7as not gainfull% e0plo%ed and beca0e a plain house7ife> "+ Petitione is allo7ed to etun to the Philippines afte a 0onth of 7o;& 7ith 9 7ee;s of (acation& afte 7hich& Petitione 7ill again etun to England fo anothe 0onth of 7o;+ !+ *o0eti0e duing the last 7ee; of *epte0be& 9:6@ befoe Petitione 7ent to England on Octobe @ of the sa0e %ea& his bothe R%an 1+ Ba%alo 3R%an4& 7ho 7as li(ing 7ith the Petitione and Respondent& told hi0 that he has so0e (e% delicate 0attes to ta;e up 7ith hi0 7hich ae inti0ate and pesonal+Accoding to R%an& PetitioneCs (alid dignit% of his fa0il% is at 0ista;e and Petitione should ;no7 e(e%thing& 7hate(e the conse?uence 0a% be+ Afte Petitione ga(e hi0 the go signal& he naated that PetitioneCs 7ife 1ichelle P+ Ba%alo has been unfaithful and has been ha(ing illicit elationship 7ith anothe 0an& Eng+ Jose 1+ *antos+ Petitione 7as ta;en abac; and stunned so Petitione as;ed hi0 fo the souce of his info0ation+ R%an info0ed heein Petitione that thei 0aid Isabel 2e Leon had been a7ae of the elationship and the 0an usuall% 7ent to thei conBugal house and e(en slept thee 7hene(e Petitione 7as in England+ Petitione got ang% and bla0ed thei 0aid fo not disclosingto hi0 such unacceptable actions ofhis 7ife& but R%an told Petitione that she 7as afaid to tell it because she 7as theatened+ Afte the Petitione cal0ed do7n& Petitione co00ended that if he 7ill confont his 7ife& heein Respondent&about he illicit elationship& she 7ill suel% den% it+ *o Petitione thought that the best 7a% 7as to catch he ed'handed in the act of infidelit% so that she could not den% it an%0oe+ Petitione suggested to R%an to thin; of a plan so the% can catch his 7ife ed'handed+ 6:+ Afte se(eal da%s of planning& Petitione& R%an and Isabel ageed to put the plan of actionin opeation on Octobe @& 9:6@+ The poble0 7as ho7 to catch Respondent 7ife in the (e% act of ha(ing se.ual intecouse 7ith he lo(e consideing the fact that thei 0asteFs oo0 7as ai'conditioned 7ith all 7indo7s fa0ed b% glass Balousies closed and co(eed b% cutains+ At fist the% thought of bea;ing do7n the 0ain doo 7ith a sledge ha00e so the% could ta;e the0 b% supise& late the% abandoned the Idea because of legal co0plications> 66+ ,inall%& Petitione thought of e0o(ing a glass Balousie of the 7indo7 so that7hat is happening inside the bedoo0 can be seen fo0 the outside once the cutain is bushed aside b% 0eans of a thin 7ie+ Though this& pesons on bed could be seen cleal% since the bed is on the sa0e le(el as the opening of the 7indo7+ Afte se(eal e.pei0ents 7hene(e Respondent 7as out& Petitione found out that Respondent cannot notice the e0o(al of the glass Balousie since thei 7indo7s ae sceened fo0 the inside of the oo0+ Petitione then 0ade a hole in the 7indo7 in ode to bush the cutain aside using thin 7ie+ 69+ As pe'aanged& Petitione e0o(ed one glass of the Balousie 7indo7 of thei 0aste oo0 so that the Respondent and he lo(e& 7hile inside thei conBugal oo0 and ha(ing se.ual intecouse& be seenfo0 outside+ 6@+ /a(ing co0pleted all the plans to catch the Respondent and he lo(e in the act& Petitione told Respondentthat he 7ill go to England on that da%& but in ealit%& Petitione alead% cancelled his flight+ Petitione instucted his bothe R%an and thei 0aid& Isabel to info0 hi0 i00ediatel% of the esult of the plan as soon as possible+ 6A+ Al0ost 0idnight of Octobe @& 9:6@& Petitione 7as info0ed b% his bothe R%an that thei plan 7as successful and pictues of the Respondent and he lo(e 7hile ha(ing se.ual intecouse 7ee ta;en+ 65+ Ehen Petitione etuned to thei conBugal houseon Octobe A& 9:6@& Petitione sa7 the photogaphs ta;en inside thei 0asteCs bedoo0 and attached heeto ae the photogaphs 7hich ae 0a;ed as Anne.es <C= and <2=+ 68+ On the sa0e da%& Petitione confonted the Respondent about he illicit elationship 7ith Eng+ Jose 1+ *antos& 7hich& the Respondent ad0itted afte the Petitione sho7ed to he the pictues ta;en 7hile she and he lo(e 7as ha(ing se.ual intecouse inside thei conBugal ho0e+ 6D+ 2ue to the se.ual infidelit% co00itted b% Respondent& Petitione finds it highl% i0pobable to continue li(ing 7ith he> PROPO*E2 *TIPULATION O, ,ACT* 6+ The identit% of paties as petitione and espondent> 9+ The fact of 0aiage& paties ha(ing been 0aied on *epte0be 8& 9::5 > @+ Neithe the Petitione no the Respondent ac?uied an% popet% befoe thei 0aiage> A+ The Petitione and Respondent did not e.ecute an% penuptial agee0ent> 5+ Out of thei 0aiage& no child 7as bon due to RespondentCs 0edical condition& 7hich 7as ;no7n to Petitione and 7hich he 7illingl% accepted+ LI*T O, 2OCU1ENTARG E)I2ENCE 6+ 1aiage Cetificate ''''Anne. HAH 9+ Eedding Pictue'''''anne. HBH :@+ Pictues of Respondent and he lo(e 7hile ha(ing se.ual intecouse''' Anne. <C= and <2= AB*TRACT O, TE*TI1ONIE* Petitione 7ill be testif%ing on the allegations in the Petition and 7ill pesent docu0enta% e(idence+ R%an 1+ Ba%alo and Isabel 2e Leon 7ill testif% on the se.ual infidelit% of the espondent + NU1BER O, EITNE**E* TO BE PRE*ENTE2 Petitione and at least t7o 394 7itnesses+ A21I**ION* Outside of the 0attes alleged& petitione is not inclined to ad0it futhe 0attes+ APPLICABLE LAE* AN2 JURI*PRU2ENCE Po(isions on the ,a0il% Code+ I**UE* E/ET/ER OR NOT T/E PETITIONER AN2 RE*PON2ENT BE LEGALLG *EPARATE2 A)AILABILITG ,OR TRIAL Counsel 7ill be a(ailable fo tial on dates con(enient 7ith this /onoable Cout+ Respectfull% *ub0itted- #ue$on Cit%+ Jul% !& 9:6A+ BODMARPEYS LAW OFFICE Counsel fo the Petitione I0+ 9@ Alabang'Pasong Road Co+ Ca0% Cout& #ue$on Cit% Tel+No+ "AA85@9 B%- ATTY. ANALITA BOHOL Roll of Attone%Cs No+ AD5:6 IBP No+5!66DAJ:6+6@+6@JPPL1 PTR No+ "D5"!"!J:6+:"+6@J #ue$on Cit% ATTY. GEM EDWARD DY Roll of Attone%Cs No+ A"A:6 IBP No+5586DAJ:6+6@+66JPPL1 PTR No+ "D5"!!:J:@+:D+:DJ #ue$on Cit% ATTY. DALE PERRAL Roll of Attone%Cs No+ 5:886 IBP No+5586DAJ:A+6@+6:JPPL1 PTR No+ !:5"!!:J:A+:D+:DJ #ue$on Cit% ATTY. EMER MARTIN Roll of Attone%Cs No+ A"886 IBP No+5586DAJ:A+6@+66JPPL1 PTR No+ !:5"D!:J:8+:D+:"J #ue$on Cit% ATTY. RAVI YSMAEL Roll of Attone%Cs No+ A"889 IBP No+5586DAJ:A+6@+66JPPL1 PTR No+ !:5"D!:J:8+:D+:DJ #ue$on Cit% Cop% funished- Office of the Cit P!o"ec#to! ------------------- Personal Service #ue$on Cit% Office of the So$icito! Ge%e!&$ ''''''''''Personal Service 6@5 A0osolo *t+& Legaspi )ill+& 1a;ati Cit%