Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Harbours of England by Ruskin, John, 1819-1900
The Harbours of England by Ruskin, John, 1819-1900
[iii]
CONTENTS.
• PAGE
• EDITOR'S PREFACE.v
• AUTHOR'S ORIGINAL PREFACE.xi
• THE HARBORS OF ENGLAND.1
1. Dover34
2. Ramsgate36
3. Plymouth38
4. Catwater40
5. Sheerness41
6. Margate43
7. Portsmouth46
8. Falmouth49
9. Sidmouth51
10. Whitby52
11. Deal54
12. Scarborough56
[v]
EDITOR'S PREFACE.
"Turner's Harbors of England," as it is generally called, is a book which, for various reasons, has never
received from readers of Mr. Ruskin's writings the attention it deserves. True, it has always been sought after
by connoisseurs, and collectors never fail with their eleven or twelve guineas whenever a set of Artist's Proofs
of the First Edition of 1856 comes into the market. But to the General Reader the book with its twelve
exquisitely delicate mezzotints—four of which Mr. Ruskin has declared to be among the very finest executed
by Turner from his marine subjects—is practically unknown.
The primary reason for this neglect is not far to seek. Since 1877 no new edition of the work has been
published, and thus it has gradually passed from public knowledge, though still regarded with lively interest
by those to whom Mr. Ruskin's words—particularly words written in further unfolding of the subtleties of
Turner's art—at all times appeal so strongly.
In his own preface Mr. Ruskin has told us all that in 1856 it was necessary to know of the genesis of the
Harbors. That account may now be supplemented with the following additional facts. In 1826 Turner (in
conjunction with Lupton, the engraver) projected and commenced a serial publication entitled The Ports of
England. But both artist and engraver lacked the opportunity required to carry the undertaking to a successful
conclusion, and three numbers only were completed. Each of these contained two engravings. Part I.,
introducing Scarborough and Whitby, duly appeared in 1826; Part II., with Dover and Ramsgate, in 1827; and
[vi]in 1828 Part III., containing Sheerness and Portsmouth, closed the series.[A] Twenty-eight years
afterwards (that is, in 1856, five years after Turner's death) these six plates, together with six new ones, were
It is matter for congratulation that at length means have been found to bring The Harbors of England once
more into currency, and to issue the book through Mr. George Allen at a price which will place it within the
reach of the reading public at large.
The last edition of 1877, with its worn and "retouched" plates,[B] was published at twenty-five shillings; less
than a [vii]third of that sum will suffice to procure a copy of this new issue in which the prints (save for their
reduced size) more nearly approach the clearness and beauty of the originals of 1856 than any of the three
editions which have immediately preceded it.
I have before me the following interesting letter addressed by Mr. Ruskin's father to Mr. W. Smith Williams,
for many years literary adviser to Messrs. Smith, Elder & Co.:—
"My Dear Sir,—I hear that in The Athenæum of 26th July there is a good article on my son's Harbors of
England, and I should be greatly obliged by Mr. Gordon Smith sending me that number.…
"The history of this book, I believe, I told you. Gambart, the French publisher and picture dealer, said some 18
months ago that he was going to put out 12 Turner plates, never published, of English Harbors, and he would
give my son two good Turner drawings for a few pages of text to illustrate them.[C] John agreed, and wrote
the text, when poorly in the spring of 1855, at Tunbridge Wells; and it seems the work has just come out. It
was in my opinion an extremely well done thing, and more likely, as far as it went, if not to be extremely
popular, at least to be received without cavil than anything he had written. If there is a very favorable review
in The Athenæum … it may tend to disarm the critics, and partly influence opinion of his larger
works.…—With our united kind regards,
[viii]
In all save one particular the Text here given follows precisely that of the previous issues. It has been the good
fortune of the present Editor to be able to restore a characteristic passage suppressed from motives of
prudence when the work was originally planned.[D] The proof-sheets of the first edition, worked upon by Mr.
Ruskin, were given by him to his old nurse Anne.[E] She, fortunately, carefully preserved them, and in turn
gave them to Mr. Allen, some ten years before he became Mr. Ruskin's publisher. These proofs had been
submitted as they came from the press to Mr. W. H. Harrison (well known to readers of On the Old Road, etc.,
as "My First Editor"), who marked them freely with notes and suggestions. To one passage he appears to have
taken so decided an objection that its author was prevailed upon to delete it. But, whilst deferring thus to the
judgment of others, and consenting to remove a sentence which he doubtless regarded with particular
satisfaction as expressing a decided opinion upon a favorite picture, Mr. Ruskin indulged in one of those
EDITOR'S PREFACE. 2
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
pleasantries which now and again we observe in his informal letters, though seldom, if ever, in his serious
writings. In the margin, below the canceled passage, he wrote boldly: "Sacrificed to the Muse of Prudence. J.
R."[F]
That Mr. Harrison was justified in raising objection to this "moderate estimate" of Turner's picture will, I
think, be readily allowed. In those days Mr. Ruskin's influence was, comparatively speaking, small; and the
expression of an opinion which heaped praise upon the single painting of a partially understood painter at the
expense of a great and popular institution would only have served to arouse opposition, and possibly to attract
ridicule. It is different to-day. [ix]We know the keen enthusiasm of the author of The Seven Lamps, and have
seen again and again how he expresses himself in terms of somewhat exaggerated admiration when writing of
a painter whom he appreciates, or a picture that he loves. To us this enthusiasm is an attractive characteristic.
It has never been permitted to distort the vision or cloud the critical faculty; and we follow the teaching of the
Master all the more closely because we feel his fervor, and know how completely he becomes possessed with
a subject which appeals to his imagination or his heart. I have therefore not scrupled to revive the words
which he consented to immolate at the shrine of Prudence.
It is not my province here to enter into any criticism of the pages which follow; but, for the benefit of those
who are not versed in the minutiæ of Shelleyan topics, a word may be said regarding Mr. Ruskin's
reference[G] to the poet who met his death in the Bay of Spezzia. The Don Juan was no "traitorous" craft.
Fuller and more authentic information is to hand now than the meager facts at the disposal of a writer in 1856;
and we know that the greed of man, and not the lack of sea-worthiness in his tiny vessel, caused Percy Shelley
to
The twelve engravings, to which reference has already been made, have been reproduced by the photogravure
process from a selected set of early examples; and, in addition, the plates so prepared have been carefully
worked upon by Mr. [x]Allen himself. It will thus be apparent that everything possible has been done to
produce a worthy edition of a worthy book, and to place in the hands of the public what to the present
generation of readers is tantamount to a new work from a pen which—alas!—has now for so long a time been
still.
THOMAS J. WISE.
[xi]
The title under which the following plates are now presented to the public, is retained merely out of respect to
this habit of Turner's. Under that title he commenced the publication, and executed the vignette for its
title-page, intending doubtless to make it worthy of taking rank with, if not far above, the consistent and
extensive series of the Southern Coast, executed in his earlier years. But procrastination and accident equally
interfered with his purpose. The excellent engraver Mr. Lupton, in co-operation with whom the work was
undertaken, was unfortunately also a man of genius, and seems to have been just as capricious as Turner
himself in the application of his powers to the matter in hand. Had one [xii]of the parties in the arrangement
been a mere plodding man of business, the work would have proceeded; but between the two men of talent it
came very naturally to a stand. They petted each other by reciprocal indulgence of delay; and at Turner's
death, the series, so magnificently announced under the title of the Harbors of England, consisted only of
twelve plates, all the less worthy of their high-sounding title in that, while they included illustrations of some
of the least important of the watering-places, they did not include any illustration whatever of such harbors of
England as Liverpool, Shields, Yarmouth, or Bristol. Such as they were, however, I was requested to
undertake their illustration. As the offer was made at a moment when much nonsense, in various forms, was
being written about Turner and his works; and among the twelve plates there were four[H] which I considered
among the very finest that had been executed from his marine subjects, I accepted the trust; partly to prevent
the really valuable series of engravings from being treated with injustice, and partly because there were
several features in them by which I could render more intelligible some remarks I wished to make on Turner's
marine painting in general.
These remarks, therefore, I have thrown together, in a connected form; less with a view to the illustration of
these particular plates, than of the general system of ship-painting which was characteristic of the great artist.
I have afterwards separately noted the points which seemed to me most deserving of attention in the plates
themselves.
Of archæological information the reader will find none. The designs themselves are, in most instances, little
more than spirited sea-pieces, with such indistinct suggestion of local features in the distance as may justify
the name given to the subject; but even when, as in the case of the Dover and Portsmouth, there is something
approaching topographical detail, I have not considered it necessary to lead the reader [xiii]into inquiries
which certainly Turner himself never thought of; nor do I suppose it would materially add to the interest of
these cloud distances or rolling seas, if I had the time—which I have not—to collect the most complete
information respecting the raising of Prospect Rows, and the establishment of circulating libraries.
Denmark Hill.
[1856.]
[1]
For there is, first, an infinite strangeness in the perfection [2]of the thing, as work of human hands. I know
nothing else that man does, which is perfect, but that. All his other doings have some sign of weakness,
affectation, or ignorance in them. They are overfinished or underfinished; they do not quite answer their end,
or they show a mean vanity in answering it too well.
But the boat's bow is naïvely perfect: complete without an effort. The man who made it knew not he was
making anything beautiful, as he bent its planks into those mysterious, ever-changing curves. It grows under
his hand into the image of a sea-shell; the seal, as it were, of the flowing of the great tides and streams of
ocean stamped on its delicate rounding. He leaves it when all is done, without a boast. It is simple work, but it
will keep out water. And every plank thence-forward is a Fate, and has men's lives wreathed in the knots of it,
as the cloth-yard shaft had their deaths in its plumes.
Then, also, it is wonderful on account of the greatness of the thing accomplished. No other work of human
hands ever gained so much. Steam-engines and telegraphs indeed help us to fetch, and carry, and talk; they lift
weights for us, and bring messages, with less trouble than would have been needed otherwise; this saving of
trouble, however, does not constitute a new faculty, it only enhances the powers we already possess. But in
that bow of the boat is the gift of another world. Without it, what prison wall would be so strong as that "white
and wailing fringe" of sea. What maimed creatures were we all, chained to our rocks, Andromeda-like, or
wandering by the endless shores; wasting our incommunicable strength, and pining in hopeless watch of
unconquerable waves? The nails that fasten together the planks of the boat's bow are the rivets of the
fellowship of the world. Their iron does more than draw lightning out of heaven, it leads love round the earth.
Then also, it is wonderful on account of the greatness of the enemy that it does battle with. To lift dead
weight; to overcome length of languid space; to multiply or systematize a given force; this we may see done
by the bar, or beam, or [3]wheel, without wonder. But to war with that living fury of waters, to bare its breast,
moment after moment, against the unwearied enmity of ocean,—the subtle, fitful, implacable smiting of the
black waves, provoking each other on, endlessly, all the infinite march of the Atlantic rolling on behind them
to their help,—and still to strike them back into a wreath of smoke and futile foam, and win its way against
them, and keep its charge of life from them;—does any other soulless thing do as much as this?
I should not have talked of this feeling of mine about a boat, if I had thought it was mine only; but I believe it
to be common to all of us who are not seamen. With the seaman, wonder changes into fellowship and close
affection; but to all landsmen, from youth upwards, the boat remains a piece of enchantment; at least unless
we entangle our vanity in it, and refine it away into mere lath, giving up all its protective nobleness for pace.
With those in whose eyes the perfection of a boat is swift fragility, I have no sympathy. The glory of a boat is,
first its steadiness of poise—its assured standing on the clear softness of the abyss; and, after that, so much
capacity of progress by oar or sail as shall be consistent with this defiance of the treachery of the sea. And,
this being understood, it is very notable how commonly the poets, creating for themselves an ideal of motion,
fasten upon the charm of a boat. They do not usually express any desire for wings, or, if they do, it is only in
some vague and half-unintended phrase, such as "flit or soar," involving wingedness. Seriously, they are
evidently content to let the wings belong to Horse, or Muse, or Angel, rather than to themselves; but they all,
somehow or other, express an honest wish for a Spiritual Boat. I will not dwell on poor Shelley's paper navies,
Yet, in speaking of poets' love of boats, I ought to have limited the love to modern poets; Dante, in this
respect, as in nearly every other, being far in advance of his age. It is not often that I congratulate myself upon
the days in which I happen to live; but I do so in this respect, that, compared with every other period of the
world, this nineteenth century (or rather, the period between 1750 and 1850) may not improperly be called the
Age of Boats; while the classic and chivalric times, in which boats were partly dreaded, partly despised, may
respectively be characterized, with regard to their means of locomotion, as the Age of Chariots, and the Age
of Horses.
[7]
For, whatever perfection and costliness there may be in the present decorations, harnessing, and horsing of
any English or Parisian wheel equipage, I apprehend that we can from none of them form any high ideal of
wheel conveyance; and that unless we had seen an Egyptian king bending his bow with his horses at the
gallop, or a Greek knight leaning with his poised lance over the shoulder of his charioteer, we have no right to
consider ourselves as thoroughly knowing what the word "chariot," in its noblest acceptation, means.
So, also, though much chivalry is yet left in us, and we English still know several things about horses, I
believe that if we had seen Charlemagne and Roland ride out hunting from Aix, or Cœur de Lion trot into
camp on a sunny evening at Ascalon, or a Florentine lady canter down the Val d'Arno in Dante's time, with
her hawk on her wrist, we should have had some other ideas even about horses than the best we can have now.
But most assuredly, nothing that ever swung at the quay sides of Carthage, or glowed with crusaders' shields
above the bays of Syria, could give to any contemporary human creature such an idea of the meaning of the
word Boat, as may be now gained by any mortal happy enough to behold as much as a Newcastle collier
beating against the wind. In the classical period, indeed, there was some importance given to shipping as the
means of locking a battle-field together on the waves; but in the chivalric period, the whole mind of man is
withdrawn from the sea, regarding it merely as a treacherous impediment, over which it was necessary
It is very interesting to note how repugnant every oceanic idea appears to be to the whole nature of our
principal English mediæval poet, Chaucer. Read first the Man of Lawe's Tale, in which the Lady Constance is
continually floated up and down the Mediterranean, and the German [8]Ocean, in a ship by herself; carried
from Syria all the way to Northumberland, and there wrecked upon the coast; thence yet again driven up and
down among the waves for five years, she and her child; and yet, all this while, Chaucer does not let fall a
single word descriptive of the sea, or express any emotion whatever about it, or about the ship. He simply tells
us the lady sailed here and was wrecked there; but neither he nor his audience appear to be capable of
receiving any sensation, but one of simple aversion, from waves, ships, or sands. Compare with his absolutely
apathetic recital, the description by a modern poet of the sailing of a vessel, charged with the fate of another
Constance:
On the other hand, much might be said about that peculiar love of green fields and birds in the Middle Ages;
and of all with which it is connected, purity and health in manners and [10]heart, as opposed to the too
frequent condition of the modern mind—
Down to Elizabeth's time chivalry lasted; and grace of dress and mien, and all else that was connected with
chivalry. Then came the ages which, when they have taken their due place in the depths of the past, will be, by
a wise and clear-sighted futurity, perhaps well comprehended under a common name, as the ages of Starch;
periods of general stiffening and bluish-whitening, with a prevailing washerwoman's taste in everything;
involving a change of steel armor into cambric; of natural hair into peruke; of natural walking into that which
will disarrange no wristbands; of plain language into quips and embroideries; and of human life in general,
from a green race-course, where to be defeated was at worst only to fall behind and recover breath, into a
slippery pole, to be climbed with toil and contortion, and in clinging to which, each man's foot is on his
neighbor's head.
But, meanwhile, the marine deities were incorruptible. It was not possible to starch the sea; and precisely as
the stiffness fastened upon men, it vanished from ships. What had once been a mere raft, with rows of formal
benches, pushed along by laborious flap of oars, and with infinite fluttering of flags and swelling of poops
above, gradually began to lean more heavily into the deep water, to sustain a gloomy weight of guns, to draw
back its spider-like feebleness of limb, and open its bosom to the wind, and finally darkened down from
[11]all its painted vanities into the long, low hull, familiar with the overflying foam; that has no other pride
but in its daily duty and victory; while, through all these changes, it gained continually in grace, strength,
audacity, and beauty, until at last it has reached such a pitch of all these, that there is not, except the very
loveliest creatures of the living world, anything in nature so absolutely notable, bewitching, and, according to
Next after the fishing-boat—which, as I said, in the architecture of the sea represents the cottage, more
especially the pastoral or agricultural cottage, watchful over some pathless domain of moorland or arable, as
the fishing-boat swims, humbly in the midst of the broad green fields and hills of ocean, out of which it has to
win such fruit as they can give, and to compass with net or drag such flocks as it may find,—next to
this ocean-cottage ranks in interest, it seems to me, the small, over-wrought, under-crewed, ill-caulked
merchant brig or schooner; the kind of ship which first shows its couple of thin masts over the low fields or
marshes as we near any third-rate sea-port; and which is sure somewhere to stud the great space of glittering
water, seen from any sea-cliff, with its four or five square-set sails. Of the larger and more polite tribes of
merchant vessels, three-masted, and passenger-carrying, I have nothing to say, feeling in general little
sympathy with people who want to go anywhere; nor caring much about anything, which in the essence of it
expresses a desire to get to other sides of the world; but only for homely and stay-at-home ships, that live their
life and die their death about English rocks. Neither have I any interest in the higher branches of commerce,
such as traffic with spice islands, and porterage of painted tea-chests or carved ivory; for all this seems to me
to fall under the head of commerce [13]of the drawing-room; costly, but not venerable. I respect in the
merchant service only those ships that carry coals, herrings, salt, timber, iron, and such other commodities,
and that have disagreeable odor, and unwashed decks. But there are few things more impressive to me than
one of these ships lying up against some lonely quay in a black sea-fog, with the furrow traced under its tawny
keel far in the harbor slime. The noble misery that there is in it, the might of its rent and strained
unseemliness, its wave-worn melancholy, resting there for a little while in the comfortless ebb, unpitied, and
claiming no pity; still less honored, least of all conscious of any claim to honor; casting and craning by due
balance whatever is in its hold up to the pier, in quiet truth of time; spinning of wheel, and slackening of rope,
and swinging of spade, in as accurate cadence as a waltz music; one or two of its crew, perhaps, away
forward, and a hungry boy and yelping dog eagerly interested in something from which a blue dull smoke
rises out of pot or pan; but dark-browed and silent, their limbs slack, like the ropes above them, entangled as
they are in those inextricable meshes about the patched knots and heaps of ill-reefed sable sail. What a
majestic sense of service in all that languor! the rest of human limbs and hearts, at utter need, not in sweet
After these most venerable, to my mind, of all ships, properly [14]so styled, I find nothing of comparable
interest in any floating fabric until we come to the great achievement of the 19th century. For one thing this
century will in after ages be considered to have done in a superb manner, and one thing, I think, only. It has
not distinguished itself in political spheres; still less in artistical. It has produced no golden age by its Reason;
neither does it appear eminent for the constancy of its Faith. Its telescopes and telegraphs would be creditable
to it, if it had not in their pursuit forgotten in great part how to see clearly with its eyes, and to talk honestly
with its tongue. Its natural history might have been creditable to it also, if it could have conquered its habit of
considering natural history to be mainly the art of writing Latin names on white tickets. But, as it is, none of
these things will be hereafter considered to have been got on with by us as well as might be; whereas it will
always be said of us, with unabated reverence,
Take it all in all, a Ship of the Line is the most honorable thing that man, as a gregarious animal, has ever
produced. By himself, unhelped, he can do better things than ships of the line; he can make poems and
pictures, and other such concentrations of what is best in him. But as a being living in flocks, and hammering
out, with alternate strokes and mutual agreement, what is necessary for him in those flocks, to get or produce,
the ship of the line is his first work. Into that he has put as much of his human patience, common sense,
forethought, experimental philosophy, self-control, habits of order and obedience, thoroughly wrought
handwork, defiance of brute elements, careless courage, careful patriotism, and calm expectation of the
judgment of God, as can well be put into a space of 300 feet long by 80 broad. And I am thankful to have
lived in an age when I could see this thing so done.
Considering, then, our shipping, under the three principal [15]types of fishing-boat, collier, and ship of the
line, as the great glory of this age; and the "New Forest" of mast and yard that follows the windings of the
Thames, to be, take it all in all, a more majestic scene, I don't say merely than any of our streets or palaces as
they now are, but even than the best that streets and palaces can generally be; it has often been a matter of
serious thought to me how far this chiefly substantial thing done by the nation ought to be represented by the
art of the nation; how far our great artists ought seriously to devote themselves to such perfect painting of our
ships as should reveal to later generations—lost perhaps in clouds of steam and floating troughs of
ashes—the aspect of an ancient ship of battle under sail.
To which, I fear, the answer must be sternly this: That no great art ever was, or can be, employed in the
careful imitation of the work of man as its principal subject. That is to say, art will not bear to be reduplicated.
A ship is a noble thing, and a cathedral a noble thing, but a painted ship or a painted cathedral is not a noble
thing. Art which reduplicates art is necessarily second-rate art. I know no principle more irrefragably
authoritative than that which I had long ago occasion to express: "All noble art is the expression of man's
delight in God's work; not in his own."
"How!" it will be asked, "Are Stanfield, Isabey, and Prout necessarily artists of the second order because they
paint ships and buildings instead of trees and clouds?" Yes, necessarily of the second order; so far as they
paint ships rather than sea, and so far as they paint buildings rather than the natural light, and color, and work
of years upon those buildings. For, in this respect, a ruined building is a noble subject, just as far as man's
work has therein been subdued by nature's; and Stanfield's chief dignity is his being a painter less of shipping
than of the seal of time or decay upon shipping.[N] For a wrecked ship, or shattered boat, is a noble subject,
while a ship in full sail, or a perfect boat, is [16]an ignoble one; not merely because the one is by reason of its
ruin more picturesque than the other, but because it is a nobler act in man to meditate upon Fate as it conquers
his work, than upon that work itself.
Shipping, therefore, in its perfection, never can become the subject of noble art; and that just because to
represent it in its perfection would tax the powers of art to the utmost. If a great painter could rest in drawing a
ship, as he can rest in drawing a piece of drapery, we might sometimes see vessels introduced by the noblest
workmen, and treated by them with as much delight as they would show in scattering luster over an
embroidered dress, or knitting the links of a coat of mail. But ships cannot be drawn at times of rest. More
complicated in their anatomy than the human frame itself, so far as that frame is outwardly discernible; liable
to all kinds of strange accidental variety in position and movement, yet in each position subject to imperative
laws which can only be followed by unerring knowledge; and involving, in the roundings and foldings of sail
and hull, delicacies of drawing greater than exist in any other inorganic object, except perhaps a snow
wreath,[O]—they present, irrespective of sea or sky, or anything else around them, difficulties which
could only be vanquished by draughtsmanship quite accomplished enough to render even the subtlest lines of
the human face and form. But the artist who has once attained such skill as this will not devote it to the
drawing of ships. He who can paint the face of St. Paul will not elaborate the parting timbers of the vessel in
which he is wrecked; and he who can represent the astonishment of the apostles at the miraculous draught will
not be solicitous about accurately showing that their boat is overloaded.
"What!" it will perhaps be replied, "have, then, ships [17]never been painted perfectly yet, even by the men
who have devoted most attention to them?" Assuredly not. A ship never yet has been painted at all, in any
other sense than men have been painted in "Landscapes with figures." Things have been painted which have a
general effect of ships, just as things have been painted which have a general effect of shepherds or banditti;
but the best average ship-painting no more reaches the truth of ships than the equestrian troops in one of Van
der Meulen's battle-pieces express the higher truths of humanity.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Take a single instance. I do not know any work in which, on the whole, there is a more unaffected love of
ships for their own sake, and a fresher feeling of sea breeze always blowing, than Stanfield's "Coast Scenery."
Now, let the reader take up that book, and look through all the plates of it at the way in which the most
important parts of a ship's skeleton are [18]drawn, those most wonderful junctions of mast with mast,
corresponding to the knee or hip in the human frame, technically known as "Tops." Under its very simplest
form, in one of those poor collier brigs, which I have above endeavored to recommend to the readers
affection, the junction of the top-gallant-mast with the topmast, when the sail is reefed, will present itself
under no less complex and mysterious form than this in Fig. 1, a horned knot of seven separate pieces of
timber, irrespective of the two masts and the yard; the whole balanced and involved in an apparently
inextricable web of chain and rope, consisting of at least sixteen ropes about the top-gallant-mast, and some
twenty-five crossing each other in every imaginable degree of slackness and slope about the topmast.
Two-thirds of these ropes are omitted in the cut, because I could not draw them without taking more time and
pains than the point to be illustrated was worth; the thing, as it is, being drawn quite well enough to give some
idea of the facts of it. Well, take up Stanfield's "Coast Scenery," and look through it in search of tops, and you
will invariably find them represented as in Fig. 2, or even with fewer lines; the example Fig. 2 being one of
the tops of the frigate running into Portsmouth harbor, magnified to about twice its size in the plate.
"Well, but it was impossible to do more on so small a scale." By no means: but take what scale you choose, of
[19]Stanfield's or any other marine painter's most elaborate painting, and let me magnify the study of the real
top in proportion, and the deficiency of detail will always be found equally great: I mean in the work of the
higher artists, for there are of course many efforts at greater accuracy of delineation by those painters of ships
who are to the higher marine painter what botanical draughtsmen are to the landscapists; but just as in the
botanical engraving the spirit and life of the plant are always lost, so in the technical ship-painting the life of
the ship is always lost, without, as far as I can see, attaining, even by this sacrifice, anything like completeness
of mechanical delineation. At least, I never saw the ship drawn yet which gave me the slightest idea of the
entanglement of real rigging.
Respecting this lower kind of ship-painting, it is always matter of wonder to me that it satisfies sailors. Some
years ago I happened to stand longer than pleased my pensioner guide before Turner's "Battle of Trafalgar," at
Greenwich Hospital; a picture which, at a moderate estimate, is simply worth all the rest of the
hospital—ground—walls—pictures and models put together. My guide, supposing me to
be detained by indignant wonder at seeing it in so good a place, assented to my supposed, sentiments by
muttering in a low voice: "Well, sir, it is a shame that that thing should be there. We ought to 'a 'ad a Uggins;
that's sartain." I was not surprised that my sailor friend should be disgusted at seeing the Victory lifted nearly
Leaving, however, the sailor to his enjoyment, on such grounds as it may be, of this model drawing, and being
[20]prepared to find only a vague and hasty shadowing forth of shipping in the works of artists proper, we will
glance briefly at the different stages of excellence which such shadowing forth has reached, and note in their
consecutive changes the feelings with which shipping has been regarded at different periods of art.
1. Mediæval Period. The vessel is regarded merely as a sort of sea-carriage, and painted only so far as it is
necessary for complete display of the groups of soldiers or saints on the deck: a great deal of quaint shipping,
richly hung with shields, and gorgeous with banners, is, however, thus incidently represented in 15th-century
manuscripts, embedded in curly green waves of sea full of long fish; and although there is never the slightest
expression of real sea character, of motion, gloom, or spray, there is more real interest of marine detail and
incident than in many later compositions.
2. Early Venetian Period. A great deal of tolerably careful boat-drawing occurs in the pictures of Carpaccio
and Gentile Bellini, deserving separate mention among the marine schools, in confirmation of what has been
stated above, that the drawing of boats is more difficult than that of the human form. For, long after all the
perspectives and fore-shortenings of the human body were completely understood, as well as those of
architecture, it remained utterly beyond the power of the artists of the time to draw a boat with even tolerable
truth. Boats are always tilted up on end, or too long, or too short, or too high in the water. Generally they
appear to be regarded with no interest whatever, and are painted merely where they are matters of necessity.
This is perfectly natural: we pronounce that there is romance in the Venetian conveyance by oars, merely
because we ourselves are in the habit of being dragged by horses. A Venetian, on the other hand, sees
vulgarity in a gondola, and thinks the only true romance is in a hackney coach. And thus, it was no more
likely that a painter in the days of Venetian power should pay much attention to the shipping in the Grand
Canal than [21]that an English artist should at present concentrate the brightest rays of his genius on a
cab-stand.
3. Late Venetian Period. Deserving mention only for its notably negative character. None of the great
Venetian painters, Tintoret, Titian, Veronese, Bellini, Giorgione, Bonifazio, ever introduce a ship if they can
help it. They delight in ponderous architecture, in grass, flowers, blue mountains, skies, clouds, and gay
dresses; nothing comes amiss to them but ships and the sea. When they are forced to introduce these, they
represent merely a dark-green plain, with reddish galleys spotted about it here and there, looking much like
small models of shipping pinned on a green board. In their marine battles, there is seldom anything discernible
except long rows of scarlet oars, and men in armor falling helplessly through them.
4. Late Roman Period. That is to say, the time of the beginning of the Renaissance landscape by the Caracci,
Claude, and Salvator. First, in their landscapes, shipping begins to assume something like independent
character, and to be introduced for the sake of its picturesque interest; although what interest could be taken
by any healthy human creature in such vessels as were then painted has always remained a mystery to me. The
ships of Claude, having hulls of a shape something between a cocoa-nut and a high-heeled shoe, balanced on
their keels on the top of the water, with some scaffolding and cross-sticks above, and a flag at the top of every
stick, form perhaps the purest exhibition of human inanity and fatuity which the arts have yet produced. The
harbors also, in which these model navies ride, are worthy of all observation for the intensity of the false taste
which, endeavoring to unite in them the characters of pleasure-ground and port, destroys the veracity of both.
There are many inlets of the Italian seas where sweet gardens and regular terraces descend to the water's edge;
but these are not the spots where merchant vessels anchor, or where bales are disembarked. On the other hand,
5. Dutch Period. Although in artistical qualities lower than is easily by language expressible, the Italian
marine painting usually conveys an idea of three facts about the sea,—that it is green, that it is deep,
and that the sun shines on it. The dark plain which stands for far away Adriatic with [23]the Venetians, and
the glinting swells of tamed wave which lap about the quays of Claude, agree in giving the general impression
that the ocean consists of pure water, and is open to the pure sky. But the Dutch painters, while they attain
considerably greater dexterity than the Italian in mere delineation of nautical incident, were by nature
precluded from ever becoming aware of these common facts; and having, in reality, never in all their lives
seen the sea, but only a shallow mixture of sea-water and sand; and also never in all their lives seen the sky,
but only a lower element between them and it, composed of marsh exhalation and fog-bank; they are not to be
with too great severity reproached for the dullness of their records of the nautical enterprise of Holland. We
only are to be reproached, who, familiar with the Atlantic, are yet ready to accept with faith, as types of sea,
the small waves en papillote, and peruke-like puffs of farinaceous foam, which were the delight of
Backhuysen and his compeers. If one could but arrest the connoisseurs in the fact of looking at them with
belief, and, magically introducing the image of a true sea-wave, let it roll up to them through the
room,—one massive fathom's height and rood's breadth of brine, passing them by but
once,—dividing, Red Sea-like, on right hand and left,—but at least setting close before their
eyes, for once in inevitable truth, what a sea-wave really is; its green mountainous giddiness of wrath, its
overwhelming crest—heavy as iron, fitful as flame, clashing against the sky in long cloven
edge,—its furrowed flanks, all ghastly clear, deep in transparent death, but all laced across with lurid
nets of spume, and tearing open into meshed interstices their churned veil of silver fury, showing still the calm
gray abyss below; that has no fury and no voice, but is as a grave always open, which the green sighing
mounds do but hide for an instant as they pass. Would they, shuddering back from this wave of the true,
implacable sea, turn forthwith to the papillotes? It might be so. It is what we are all doing, more or less,
continually.
Well, let the waves go their way; it is not of them that we [24]have here to reason; but be it remembered, that
men who cannot enter into the Mind of the Sea, cannot for the same reason enter into the Mind of Ships, in
their contention with it; and the fluttering, tottering, high-pooped, flag-beset fleets of these Dutch painters
have only this much superiority over the caricatures of the Italians, that they indeed appear in some degree to
have been studied from the high-pooped and flag-beset nature which was in that age visible, while the Claude
and Salvator ships are ideals of the studio. But the effort is wholly unsuccessful. Any one who has ever
attempted to sketch a vessel in motion knows that he might as easily attempt to sketch a bird on the wing, or a
6. Modern Period. The gradual appreciation of the true character both of shipping and the ocean, in the works
of the painters of the last half century, is part of that successful study of other elements of landscape, of which
I have long labored at a consistent investigation, now partly laid before the public; I shall not, therefore, here
enter into any general inquiry respecting modern sea-painting, but limit myself to a notice of the particular
feelings which influenced Turner in his marine studies, so far as they are shown in the series of plates which
have now been trusted to me for illustration.
Among the earliest sketches from nature which Turner appears to have made, in pencil and Indian ink, when a
boy of twelve or fourteen, it is very singular how large a proportion consists of careful studies of stranded
boats. Now, after some fifteen years of conscientious labor, with the single view of acquiring knowledge of
the ends and powers of art, I have come to one conclusion, which at the beginning [26]of those fifteen years
would have been very astonishing to myself—that, of all our modern school of landscape painters, next
to Turner, and before the rise of the Pre-Raphaelites, the man whose works are on the whole most valuable,
and show the highest intellect, is Samuel Prout. It is very notable that also in Prout's early studies, shipping
subjects took not merely a prominent, but I think even a principal, place.
The reason of this is very evident: both Turner and Prout had in them an untaught, inherent perception of what
was great and pictorial. They could not find it in the buildings or in the scenes immediately around them. But
they saw some element of real power in the boats. Prout afterwards found material suited to his genius in other
directions, and left his first love; but Turner retained the early affection to the close of his life, and the last oil
picture which he painted, before his noble hand forgot its cunning, was the Wreck-buoy. The last thoroughly
perfect picture he ever painted, was the Old Téméraire.
The studies which he was able to make from nature in his early years, are chiefly of fishing-boats, barges, and
other minor marine still life; and his better acquaintance with this kind of shipping than with the larger kind is
very marked in the Liber Studiorum, in which there are five careful studies of fishing-boats under various
circumstances; namely, Calais Harbor, Sir John Mildmay's Picture, Flint Castle, Marine Dabblers, and the
Calm; while of other shipping, there are only two subjects, both exceedingly unsatisfactory.
Turner, however, deemed it necessary to his reputation at that period that he should paint pictures in the style
of Vandevelde; and, in order to render the resemblance more complete, he appears to have made careful
drawings of the different parts of old Dutch shipping. I found a large number of such drawings among the
contents of his neglected portfolios at his death; some were clearly not by his own hand, others appeared to be
transcripts by him from prints or earlier drawings; the quantity altogether was very great, and [27]the evidence
In executing the series of drawings for the work known as the Southern Coast, Turner appears to have gained
many ideas about shipping, which, once received, he laid up by him for use in after years. The evidence of this
laying by of thought in his mind, as it were in reserve, until he had power to express it, is curious and
complete throughout his life; and although the Southern Coast drawings are for the most part quiet in feeling,
and remarkably simple in their mode of execution, I believe it was in the watch over the Cornish and
Dorsetshire coast, which the making of those drawings involved, that he received all his noblest ideas about
sea and ships.
Of one thing I am certain; Turner never drew anything that could be seen, without having seen it. That is to
say, though he would draw Jerusalem from some one else's sketch, it would be, nevertheless, entirely from his
own experience of ruined walls: and though he would draw ancient shipping (for an imitation of Vandevelde,
or a vignette to the voyage of Columbus) from such data as he could get about things which he could no more
see with his own eyes, yet when, of his own free will, in the subject of Ilfracombe, he, in the year 1818,
introduces a shipwreck, I am perfectly certain that, before the year 1818, he had seen a shipwreck, and,
moreover, one of that horrible kind—a ship dashed to pieces in deep water, at the foot of an
inaccessible cliff. Having once seen this, I perceive, also, that the image of it could not be effaced from his
mind. It taught him two great facts, which he never afterwards forgot; namely, that both ships and sea were
things that broke to pieces. He never afterwards painted a ship quite in fair order. There is invariably a
feeling about his vessels of strange awe and danger; the sails are in some way loosening, [28]or flapping as if
in fear; the swing of the hull, majestic as it may be, seems more at the mercy of the sea than in triumph over it;
the ship never looks gay, never proud, only warlike and enduring. The motto he chose, in the Catalogue of the
Academy, for the most cheerful marine he ever painted, the Sun of Venice going to Sea, marked the
uppermost feeling in his mind:
But he had seen more than the death of the ship. He had seen the sea feed her white flames on souls of men;
and heard what a storm-gust sounded like, that had taken up with it, in its swirl of a moment, the last breaths
of a ship's crew. He never forgot either the sight or the sound. Among the last plates prepared by his own hand
for the Liber Studiorum, (all of them, as was likely from his advanced knowledge, finer than any previous
pieces of the series, and most of them unfortunately never published, being retained beside him for some last
touch—forever delayed,) perhaps the most important is one of the body of a drowned sailor, dashed
against a vertical rock in the jaws of one merciless, immeasurable wave. He repeated the same idea, though
more feebly expressed, later in life, in a small drawing of Grandville, on the coast of France. The sailor
clinging to the boat in the marvelous drawing of Dunbar is another reminiscence of the same kind. He hardly
ever painted a steep rocky coast without some fragment of a devoured ship, grinding in the blanched teeth of
the surges,—just enough left to be a token of utter destruction. Of his two most important paintings of
definite shipwreck I shall speak presently.
I said that at this period he first was assured of another [29]fact, namely, that the Sea also was a thing that
broke to pieces. The sea up to that time had been generally regarded by painters as a liquidly composed,
level-seeking consistent thing, with a smooth surface, rising to a water-mark on sides of ships; in which ships
were scientifically to be embedded, and wetted, up to said water-mark, and to remain dry above the same. But
One effect of this revelation of the nature of ocean to him was not a little singular. It seemed that ever
afterwards his appreciation of the calmness of water was deepened by what he had witnessed of its frenzy, and
a certain class of entirely tame subjects were treated by him even with increased affection after he had seen
the full manifestation of sublimity. He had always a great regard for canal boats, and instead of sacrificing
these old, and one would have thought unentertaining, friends to the deities of Storm, he seems to have
returned with a lulling pleasure from the foam and danger of the beach to the sedgy bank and stealthy barge of
the lowland [30]river. Thenceforward his work which introduces shipping is divided into two classes; one
embodying the poetry of silence and calmness, the other of turbulence and wrath. Of intermediate conditions
he gives few examples; if he lets the wind down upon the sea at all, it is nearly always violent, and though the
waves may not be running high, the foam is torn off them in a way which shows they will soon run higher. On
the other hand, nothing is so perfectly calm as Turner's calmness. To the canal barges of England he soon
added other types of languid motion; the broad-ruddered barks of the Loire, the drooping sails of Seine, the
arcaded barks of the Italian lakes slumbering on expanse of mountain-guarded wave, the dreamy prows of
pausing gondolas on lagoons at moon-rise; in each and all commanding an intensity of calm, chiefly because
he never admitted an instant's rigidity. The surface of quiet water with other painters becomes {lt}FIXED.
With Turner it looks as if a fairy's breath would stir it, but the fairy's breath is not there. So also his boats are
intensely motionless, because intensely capable of motion. No other painter ever floated a boat quite rightly;
all other boats stand on the water, or are fastened in it; only his float in it. It is very difficult to trace the
reasons of this, for the rightness of the placing on the water depends on such subtle curves and shadows in the
floating object and its reflection, that in most cases the question of entirely right or entirely wrong resolves
itself into the "estimation of an hair": and what makes the matter more difficult still, is, that sometimes we
may see a boat drawn with the most studied correctness in every part, which yet will not swim; and sometimes
we may find one drawn with many easily ascertainable errors, which yet swims well enough; so that the
drawing of boats is something like the building of them, one may set off their lines by the most authentic
rules, and yet never be sure they will sail well. It is, however, to be observed that Turner seemed, in those
southern coast storms, to have been somewhat too strongly impressed by the disappearance of smaller crafts
in surf, and was wont afterwards to give an uncomfortable [31]aspect even to his gentlest seas, by burying his
boats too deeply. When he erred, in this or other matters, it was not from want of pains, for of all accessories
to landscape, ships were throughout his life those which he studied with the greatest care. His figures,
whatever their merit or demerit, are certainly never the beloved part of his work; and though the architecture
was in his early drawings careful, and continued to be so down to the Hakewell's Italy series, it soon became
mannered and false whenever it was principal. He would indeed draw a ruined tower, or a distant town,
incomparably better than any one else, and a staircase or a bit of balustrade very carefully; but his temples and
cathedrals showed great ignorance of detail, and want of understanding of their character. But I am aware of
no painting from the beginning of his life to its close, containing modern shipping as its principal subject, in
which he did not put forth his full strength, and pour out his knowledge of detail with a joy which renders
those works, as a series, among the most valuable he ever produced. Take for instance:
I know no fourteen pictures by Turner for which these seven might be wisely changed; and in all of these the
shipping is thoroughly principal, and studied from existing ships. A large number of inferior works were,
however, also produced by him in imitation of Vandevelde, representing old Dutch shipping; in these the
shipping is scattered, scudding and distant, the sea gray and lightly broken. Such pictures are, generally
speaking, among those of least value which he has produced. Two very important ones, however, [32]belong
to the imitative school: Lord Ellesmere's, founded on Vandevelde; and the Dort, at Farnley, on Cuyp. The
latter, as founded on the better master, is the better picture, but still possesses few of the true Turner qualities,
except his peculiar calmness, in which respect it is unrivaled; and if joined with Lord Yarborough's
Shipwreck, the two may be considered as the principal symbols, in Turner's early oil paintings, of his two
strengths in Terror and Repose. Among his drawings, shipping, as the principal subject, does not always
constitute a work of the first class; nor does it so often occur. For the difficulty, in a drawing, of getting good
color is so much less, and that of getting good form so much greater, than in oil, that Turner naturally threw
his elaborate studies of ship form into oil, and made his noblest work in drawing rich in hues of landscape.
Yet the Cowes, Devonport, and Gosport, from the England and Wales (the Saltash is an inferior work), united
with two drawings of this series, Portsmouth and Sheerness, and two from Farnley, one of the wreck of an
Indiaman, and the other of a ship of the line taking stores, would form a series, not indeed as attractive at first
sight as many others, but embracing perhaps more of Turner's peculiar, unexampled, and unapproachable gifts
than any other group of drawings which could be selected, the choice being confined to one class of subject.
I have only to state, in conclusion, that these twelve drawings of the Harbors of England are more
representable by engraving than most of his works. Few parts of them are brilliant in color; they were
executed chiefly in brown and blue, and with more direct reference to the future engraving than was common
with Turner. They are also small in size, generally of the exact dimensions of the plate, and therefore the lines
of the compositions are not spoiled by contraction; while finally, the touch of the painter's hand upon the
wave-surface is far better imitated by mezzotint engraving than by any of the ordinary expedients of line.
Take them all in all, they form the most valuable series of marine studies which have as yet been published
from his works; and I hope [33]that they may be of some use hereafter in recalling the ordinary aspect of our
English seas, at the exact period when the nation had done its utmost in the wooden and woven strength of
ships, and had most perfectly fulfilled the old and noble prophecy—
[34]
I.—DOVER.
I.—DOVER. 19
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
This port has some right to take precedence of others, as being that assuredly which first exercises the
hospitality of England to the majority of strangers who set foot on her shores. I place it first therefore among
our present subjects; though the drawing itself, and chiefly on account of its manifestation of Turner's faulty
habit of local exaggeration, deserves no such pre-eminence. He always painted, not the place itself, but his
impression of it, and this on steady principle; leaving to inferior artists the task of topographical detail; and he
was right in this principle, as I have shown elsewhere, when the impression was a genuine one; but in the
present case it is not so. He has lost the real character of Dover Cliffs by making the town at their feet three
times lower in proportionate height than it really is; nor is he to be justified in giving the barracks, which
appear on the left hand, more the air of a hospice on the top of an Alpine precipice, than of an establishment
which, out of Snargate street, can be reached, without drawing breath, by a winding stair of some 170 steps;
making the slope beside them more like the side of Skiddaw than what it really is, the earthwork of an
unimportant battery.
This design is also remarkable as an instance of that restlessness which was above noticed even in Turner's
least stormy seas. There is nothing tremendous here in scale of wave, but the whole surface is fretted and
disquieted by torturing wind; an effect which was always increased during the progress of the subjects, by
Turner's habit of scratching out small sparkling lights, in order to make the plate "bright," or "lively."[Q] In a
general way the engravers used to like [35]this, and, as far as they were able, would tempt Turner farther into
the practice, which was precisely equivalent to that of supplying the place of healthy and heart-whole
cheerfulness by dram-drinking.
The two sea-gulls in the front of the picture were additions of this kind, and are very injurious, confusing the
organization and concealing the power of the sea. The merits of the drawing are, however, still great as a piece
of composition. The left-hand side is most interesting, and characteristic of Turner: no other artist would have
put the round pier so exactly under the round cliff. It is under it so accurately, that if the nearly vertical falling
line of that cliff be continued, it strikes the sea-base of the pier to a hair's breadth. But Turner knew better than
any man the value of echo, as well as of contrast,—of repetition, as well as of opposition. The round
pier repeats the line of the main cliff, and then the sail repeats the diagonal shadow which crosses it, and
emerges above it just as the embankment does above the cliff brow. Lower, come the opposing curves in the
two boats, the whole forming one group of sequent lines up the whole side of the picture. The rest of the
composition is more commonplace than is usual with the great master; but there are beautiful transitions of
light and shade between the sails of the little fishing-boat, the brig behind her, and the cliffs. Note how
dexterously the two front sails[R] of the brig are brought on the top of the white sail of the fishing-boat to help
to detach it from the white cliffs.
[36]
I.—DOVER. 20
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
II.—RAMSGATE.
This, though less attractive, at first sight, than the former plate, is a better example of the master, and far truer
and nobler as a piece of thought. The lifting of the brig on the wave is very daring; just one of the things
which is seen in every gale, but which no other painter than Turner ever represented; and the lurid
transparency of the dark sky, and wild expression of wind in the fluttering of the falling sails of the vessel
running into the harbor, are as fine as anything of the kind he has done. There is great grace in the drawing of
this latter vessel: note the delicate switch forward of her upper mast.
There is a very singular point connected with the composition of this drawing, proving it (as from internal
evidence was most likely) to be a record of a thing actually seen. Three years before the date of this engraving
Turner had made a drawing of Ramsgate for the Southern Coast series. That drawing represents the same day,
the same moment, and the same ships, from a different point of view. It supposes the spectator placed in a boat
some distance out at sea, beyond the fishing-boats on the left in the present plate, and looking towards the
town, or into the harbor. The brig, which is near us here, is then, of course, in the distance on the right; the
schooner entering the harbor, and, in both plates, lowering her fore-topsail, is, of course, seen foreshortened;
the fishing-boats only are a little different in position and set of sail. The sky is precisely the same, only a dark
piece of it, which is too far to the right to be included in this view, enters into the wider distance of the other,
and the town, of course, becomes a more important object.
The persistence in one conception furnishes evidence of [37]the very highest imaginative power. On a
common mind, what it has seen is so feebly impressed, that it mixes other ideas with it immediately; forgets
it—modifies it—adorns it,—does anything but keep hold of it. But when Turner had once
seen that stormy hour at Ramsgate harbor-mouth, he never quitted his grasp of it. He had seen the two vessels;
one go in, the other out. He could have only seen them at that one moment—from one point; but the
impression on his imagination is so strong, that he is able to handle it three years afterwards, as if it were a
real thing, and turn it round on the table of his brain, and look at it from the other corner. He will see the brig
near, instead of far off: set the whole sea and sky so many points round to the south, and see how they look,
so. I never traced power of this kind in any other man.
[38]
II.—RAMSGATE. 21
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
III.—PLYMOUTH.
The drawing for this plate is one of Turner's most remarkable, though not most meritorious, works: it contains
the brightest rainbow he ever painted, to my knowledge; not the best, but the most dazzling. It has been much
modified in the plate. It is very like one of Turner's pieces of caprice to introduce a rainbow at all as a
principal feature in such a scene; for it is not through the colors of the iris that we generally expect to be
shown eighteen-pounder batteries and ninety-gun ships.
Whether he meant the dark cloud (intensely dark blue in the original drawing), with the sunshine pursuing it
back into distance; and the rainbow, with its base set on a ship of battle, to be together types of war and peace,
and of the one as the foundation of the other, I leave it to the reader to decide. My own impression is, that
although Turner might have some askance symbolism in his mind, the present design is, like the former one,
in many points a simple reminiscence of a seen fact.[S]
However, whether reminiscent or symbolic, the design is, to my mind, an exceedingly unsatisfactory one,
owing to its total want of principal subject. The fort ceases to be of importance because of the bank and tower
in front of it; the ships, necessarily for the effect, but fatally for themselves, are confused, and incompletely
drawn, except the little sloop, which looks paltry and like a toy; and the foreground objects [39]are, for work
of Turner, curiously ungraceful and uninteresting.
It is possible, however, that to some minds the fresh and dewy space of darkness, so animated with latent
human power, may give a sensation of great pleasure, and at all events the design is worth study on account of
its very strangeness.
[40]
IV.—CATWATER.
III.—PLYMOUTH. 22
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
I have placed in the middle of the series those pictures which I think least interesting, though the want of
interest is owing more to the monotony of their character than to any real deficiency in their subjects. If, after
contemplating paintings of arid deserts or glowing sunsets, we had come suddenly upon this breezy entrance
to the crowded cove of Plymouth, it would have gladdened our hearts to purpose; but having already been at
sea for some time, there is little in this drawing to produce renewal of pleasurable impression: only one useful
thought may be gathered from the very feeling of monotony. At the time when Turner executed these
drawings, his portfolios were full of the most magnificent subjects—coast and inland,—gathered
from all the noblest scenery of France and Italy. He was ready to realize these sketches for any one who
would have asked it of him, but no consistent effort was ever made to call forth his powers; and the only
means by which it was thought that the public patronage could be secured for a work of this kind, was by
keeping familiar names before the eye, and awakening the so-called "patriotic," but in reality narrow and
selfish, associations belonging to well-known towns or watering-places. It is to be hoped, that when a great
landscape painter appears among us again, we may know better how to employ him, and set him to paint for
us things which are less easily seen, and which are somewhat better worth seeing, than the mists of the
Catwater, or terraces of Margate.
[41]
V.—SHEERNESS.
IV.—CATWATER. 23
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
I look upon this as one of the noblest sea-pieces which Turner ever produced. It has not his usual fault of
over-crowding or over-glitter; the objects in it are few and noble, and the space infinite. The sky is quite one
of his best: not violently black, but full of gloom and power; the complicated roundings of its volumes behind
the sloop's mast, and downwards to the left, have been rendered by the engraver with notable success; and the
dim light entering along the horizon, full of rain, behind the ship of war, is true and grand in the highest
degree. By comparing it with the extreme darkness of the skies in the Plymouth, Dover, and Ramsgate, the
reader will see how much more majesty there is in moderation than in extravagance, and how much more
darkness, as far as sky is concerned, there is in gray than in black. It is not that the Plymouth and Dover skies
are false,—such impenetrable forms of thunder-cloud are amongst the commonest phenomena of
storm; but they have more of spent flash and past shower in them than the less passionate, but more truly
stormy and threatening, volumes of the sky here. The Plymouth storm will very thoroughly wet the sails, and
wash the decks, of the ships at anchor, but will send nothing to the bottom. For these pale and lurid masses,
there is no saying what evil they may have in their thoughts, or what they may have to answer for before
night. The ship of war in the distance is one of many instances of Turner's dislike to draw complete rigging;
and this not only because he chose to give an idea of his ships having seen rough service, and being crippled;
but also because in men-of-war he liked the mass of the hull to be increased in apparent weight and size by
want of upper spars. All artists of any rank share this last [42]feeling. Stanfield never makes a careful study of
a hull without shaking some or all of its masts out of it first, if possible. See, in the Coast Scenery, Portsmouth
harbor, Falmouth, Hamoaze, and Rye old harbors; and compare, among Turner's works, the near hulls in the
Devonport, Saltash, and Castle Upnor, and distance of Gosport. The fact is, partly that the precision of line in
the complete spars of a man-of-war is too formal to come well into pictorial arrangements, and partly that the
chief glory of a ship of the line is in its aspect of being "one that hath had losses."
The subtle varieties of curve in the drawing of the sails of the near sloop are altogether exquisite; as well as
the contrast of her black and glistering side with those sails, and with the sea. Examine the wayward and
delicate play of the dancing waves along her flank, and between her and the brig in ballast, plunging slowly
before the wind; I have not often seen anything so perfect in fancy, or in execution of engraving.
The heaving and black buoy in the near sea is one of Turner's "echoes," repeating, with slight change, the head
of the sloop with its flash of luster. The chief aim of this buoy is, however, to give comparative lightness to
the shadowed part of the sea, which is, indeed, somewhat overcharged in darkness, and would have been felt
to be so, but for this contrasting mass. Hide it with the hand, and this will be immediately felt. There is only
one other of Turner's works which, in its way, can be matched with this drawing, namely, the Mouth of the
Humber in the River Scenery. The latter is, on the whole, the finer picture; but this by much the more
interesting in the shipping.
[43]
VI.—MARGATE.
V.—SHEERNESS. 24
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
This plate is not, at first sight, one of the most striking of the series; but it is very beautiful, and highly
characteristic of Turner.[T] First, in its choice of subjects: for it seems very notably capricious in a painter
eminently capable of rendering scenes of sublimity and mystery, to devote himself to the delineation of one of
the most prosaic of English watering-places—not once or twice, but in a series of elaborate drawings,
of which this is the fourth. The first appeared in the Southern Coast series, and was followed by an elaborate
drawing on a large scale, with a beautiful sunrise; then came another careful and very beautiful drawing in the
England and Wales series; and finally this, which is a sort of poetical abstract of the first. Now, if we
enumerate the English ports one by one, from Berwick to Whitehaven, round the island, there will hardly be
found another so utterly devoid of all picturesque or romantic interest as Margate. Nearly all have some steep
eminence of down or cliff, some pretty retiring dingle, some roughness of old harbor or straggling
fisher-hamlet, some fragment of castle or abbey on the heights above, capable of becoming a leading point in
a picture; but Margate is simply a mass of modern parades and streets, with a little bit of chalk cliff, an orderly
pier, and some bathing-machines. Turner never conceives it as anything else; and yet for the sake of this
simple vision, again and again he quits all higher thoughts. The beautiful bays of Northern Devon and
Cornwall he never painted but once, and that very imperfectly. The finest subjects of the Southern Coast
series—the Minehead, [44]Clovelly, Ilfracombe, Watchet, East and West Looe, Tintagel,
Boscastle—he never touched again; but he repeated Ramsgate, Deal, Dover, and Margate, I know not
how often.
Whether his desire for popularity, which, in spite of his occasional rough defiances of public opinion, was
always great, led him to the selection of those subjects which he thought might meet with most acceptance
from a large class of the London public, or whether he had himself more pleasurable associations connected
with these places than with others, I know not; but the fact of the choice itself is a very mournful one,
considered with respect to the future interests of art. There is only this one point to be remembered, as tending
to lessen our regret, that it is possible Turner might have felt the necessity of compelling himself sometimes to
dwell on the most familiar and prosaic scenery, in order to prevent his becoming so much accustomed to that
of a higher class as to diminish his enthusiasm in its presence. Into this probability I shall have occasion to
examine at greater length hereafter.
The plate of Margate now before us is nearly as complete a duplicate of the Southern Coast view as the
previous plate is of that of Ramsgate; with this difference, that the position of the spectator is here the same,
but the class of ship is altered, though the ship remains precisely in the same spot. A piece of old wreck,
which was rather an important object to the left of the other drawing, is here removed. The figures are
employed in the same manner in both designs.
The details of the houses of the town are executed in the original drawing with a precision which adds almost
painfully to their natural formality. It is certainly provoking to find the great painter, who often only deigns to
VI.—MARGATE. 25
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
bestow on some Rhenish fortress or French city, crested with Gothic towers, a few misty and
indistinguishable touches of his brush, setting himself to indicate, with unerring toil, every separate square
window in the parades, hotels, and circulating libraries of an English bathing-place.
The whole of the drawing is well executed, and free from [45]fault or affectation, except perhaps in the
somewhat confused curlings of the near sea. I had much rather have seen it breaking in the usual
straightforward way. The brilliant white of the piece of chalk cliff is evidently one of the principal aims of the
composition. In the drawing the sea is throughout of a dark fresh blue, the sky grayish blue, and the grass on
the top of the cliffs a little sunburnt, the cliffs themselves being left in the almost untouched white of the
paper.
[46]
VII.—PORTSMOUTH.
This beautiful drawing is a third recurrence by Turner to his earliest impression of Portsmouth, given in the
Southern Coast series. The buildings introduced differ only by a slight turn of the spectator towards the right;
the buoy is in the same spot; the man-of-war's boat nearly so; the sloop exactly so, but on a different tack; and
the man-of-war, which is far off to the left at anchor in the Southern Coast view, is here nearer, and getting up
her anchor.
The idea had previously passed through one phase of greater change, in his drawing of "Gosport" for the
England, in which, while the sky of the Southern Coast view was almost cloud for cloud retained, the interest
of the distant ships of the line had been divided with a collier brig and a fast-sailing boat. In the present view
he returns to his early thought, dwelling, however, now with chief insistence on the ship of the line, which is
certainly the most majestic of all that he has introduced in his drawings.
It is also a very curious instance of that habit of Turner's before referred to (p. {ref}27), of never painting a
ship quite in good order. On showing this plate the other day to a naval officer, he complained of it, first that
"the jib[U] would not be wanted with the wind blowing out of harbor," and, secondly, that "a man-of-war
would never have her foretop-gallant sail set, and her main and mizzen top-gallants furled:—all the
men would be on the yards at once."
I believe this criticism to be perfectly just, though it has happened to me, very singularly, whenever I have had
the opportunity of making complete inquiry into any technical matter of this kind, respecting which some
VII.—PORTSMOUTH. 26
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
professional person [47]had blamed Turner, that I have always found, in the end, Turner was right, and the
professional critic wrong, owing to some want of allowance for possible accidents, and for necessary modes
of pictorial representation. Still, this cannot be the case in every instance; and supposing my sailor informant
to be perfectly right in the present one, the disorderliness of the way in which this ship is represented as
setting her sails, gives us farther proof of the imperative instinct in the artist's mind, refusing to contemplate a
ship, even in her proudest moments, but as in some way over-mastered by the strengths of chance and storm.
The wave on the left hand beneath the buoy, presents a most interesting example of the way in which Turner
used to spoil his work by retouching. All his truly fine drawings are either done quickly, or at all events
straight forward, without alteration: he never, as far as I have examined his works hitherto, altered but to
destroy. When he saw a plate look somewhat dead or heavy, as, compared with the drawing, it was almost
sure at first to do, he used to scratch out little lights all over it, and make it "sparkling"; a process in which the
engravers almost unanimously delighted,[V] and over the impossibility of which they now mourn, declaring it
to be hopeless to engrave after Turner, since he cannot now scratch their plates for them. It is quite true that
these small lights were always placed beautifully; and though the plate, after its "touching," generally looked
as if ingeniously salted out of her dredging-box by an artistical cook, the salting was done with a spirit which
no one else can now imitate. But the original power of the work was forever destroyed. If the reader will look
carefully beneath the white touches on the left in this sea, he will discern dimly the form of a round nodding
hollow breaker. This in the early state of the plate is a gaunt, dark, angry wave, rising at the shoal indicated by
the buoy;—Mr. Lupton has fac-similed with so singular skill [48]the scratches of the penknife by
which Turner afterwards disguised this breaker, and spoiled his picture, that the plate in its present state is
almost as interesting as the touched proof itself; interesting, however, only as a warning to all artists never to
lose hold of their first conception. They may tire even of what is exquisitely right, as they work it out, and
their only safety is in the self-denial of calm completion.
[49]
VIII.—FALMOUTH.
This is one of the most beautiful and best-finished plates of the series, and Turner has taken great pains with
the drawing; but it is sadly open to the same charges which were brought against the Dover, of an attempt to
reach a false sublimity by magnifying things in themselves insignificant. The fact is that Turner, when he
prepared these drawings, had been newly inspired by the scenery of the Continent; and with his mind entirely
occupied by the ruined towers of the Rhine, he found himself called upon to return to the formal embrasures
and unappalling elevations of English forts and hills. But it was impossible for him to recover the simplicity
VIII.—FALMOUTH. 27
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
and narrowness of conception in which he had executed the drawing of the Southern Coast, or to regain the
innocence of delight with which he had once assisted gravely at the drying of clothes over the limekiln at
Comb Martin, or penciled the woodland outlines of the banks of Dartmouth Cove. In certain fits of prosaic
humorism, he would, as we have seen, condemn himself to delineation of the parades of a watering-place; but
the moment he permitted himself to be enthusiastic, vaster imaginations crowded in upon him: to modify his
old conception in the least, was to exaggerate it; the mount of Pendennis is lifted into rivalship with
Ehrenbreitstein, and hardworked Falmouth glitters along the distant bay, like the gay magnificence of Resina
or Sorrento.
This effort at sublimity is all the more to be regretted, because it never succeeds completely. Shade, or
magnify, or mystify as he may, even Turner cannot make the minute neatness of the English fort appeal to us
as forcibly as the remnants of Gothic wall and tower that crown the Continental [50]crags; and invest them as
he may with smoke or sunbeam, the details of our little mounded hills will not take the rank of cliffs of Alp,
or promontories of Apennine; and we lose the English simplicity, without gaining the Continental nobleness.
I have also a prejudice against this picture for being disagreeably noisy. Wherever there is something serious
to be done, as in a battle piece, the noise becomes an element of the sublimity; but to have great guns going
off in every direction beneath one's feet on the right, and all round the other side of the castle, and from the
deck of the ship of the line, and from the battery far down the cove, and from the fort on the top of the hill,
and all for nothing, is to my mind eminently troublesome.
The drawing of the different wreaths and depths of smoke, and the explosive look of the flash on the right,
are, however, very wonderful and peculiarly Turneresque; the sky is also beautiful in form, and the
foreground, in which we find his old regard for washerwomen has not quite deserted him, singularly skillful.
It is curious how formal the whole picture becomes if this figure and the gray stones beside it are hidden with
the hand.
[51]
IX.—SIDMOUTH.
This drawing has always been interesting to me among Turner's sea pieces, on account of the noble gathering
together of the great wave on the left,—the back of a breaker, just heaving itself up, and provoking
itself into passion, before its leap and roar against the beach. But the enjoyment of these designs is much
interfered with by their monotony: it is seriously to be regretted that in all but one the view is taken from the
IX.—SIDMOUTH. 28
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
sea; for the spectator is necessarily tired by the perpetual rush and sparkle of water, and ceases to be
impressed by it. It would be felt, if this plate were seen alone, that there are few marine paintings in which the
weight and heaping of the sea are given so faithfully.
For the rest it is perhaps more to be regretted that we are kept to our sea-level at Sidmouth than at any other of
the localities illustrated. What claim the pretty little village has to be considered as a port of England, I know
not; but if it was to be so ranked, a far more interesting study of it might have been made from the heights
above the town, whence the ranges of dark-red sandstone cliffs stretching to the southwest are singularly bold
and varied. The detached fragment of sandstone which forms the principal object in Turner's view has long
ago fallen, and even while it stood could hardly have been worth the honor of so careful illustration.
[52]
X.—WHITBY.
As an expression of the general spirit of English coast scenery, this plate must be considered the principal one
of the series. Like all the rest, it is a little too grand for its subject; but the exaggerations of space and size are
more allowable here than in the others, as partly necessary to convey the feeling of danger conquered by
activity and commerce, which characterizes all our northerly Eastern coast. There are cliffs more terrible, and
winds more wild, on other shores; but nowhere else do so many white sails lean against the bleak wind, and
glide across the cliff shadows. Nor do I know many other memorials of monastic life so striking as the abbey
on that dark headland. We are apt in our journeys through lowland England, to watch with some secret
contempt the general pleasantness of the vales in which our abbeys were founded, without taking any pains to
inquire into the particular circumstances which directed or compelled the choice of the monks, and without
reflecting that, if the choice were a selfish one, the selfishness is that of the English lowlander turning monk,
not that of monachism; since, if we examine the sites of the Swiss monasteries and convents, we shall always
find the snow lying round them in July; and it must have been cold meditating in these cloisters of St. Hilda's
when the winter wind set from the east. It is long since I was at Whitby, and I am not sure whether Turner is
right in giving so monotonous and severe verticality to the cliff above which the abbey stands; but I believe it
must have some steep places about it, since the tradition which, in nearly all parts of the island where fossil
ammonites are found, is sure to be current respecting them, takes quite an original form at Whitby, owing to
the steepness of [53]this rock. In general, the saint of the locality has simply turned all the serpents to stone;
but at Whitby, St. Hilda drove them over the cliff, and the serpents, before being petrified, had all their heads
broken off by the fall!
X.—WHITBY. 29
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
[54]
XI.—DEAL.
I have had occasion,[W] elsewhere, to consider at some length, the peculiar love of the English for neatness
and minuteness: but I have only considered, without accounting for, or coming to any conclusion about it;
and, the more I think of it, the more it puzzles me to understand what there can be in our great national mind
which delights to such an extent in brass plates, red bricks, square curbstones, and fresh green paint, all on the
tiniest possible scale. The other day I was dining in a respectable English "Inn and Posting-house," not ten
miles from London, and, measuring the room after dinner, I found it exactly twice and a quarter the height of
my umbrella. It was a highly comfortable room, and associated, in the proper English manner, with outdoor
sports and pastimes, by a portrait of Jack Hall, fisherman of Eton, and of Mr. C. Davis on his favorite mare;
but why all this hunting and fishing enthusiasm should like to reduce itself, at home, into twice and a quarter
the height of an umbrella, I could not in any wise then, nor have I at any other time been able to ascertain.
Perhaps the town of Deal involves as much of this question in its aspect and reputation, as any other place in
Her Majesty's dominions: or at least it seemed so to me, coming to it as I did, after having been accustomed to
the boat-life at Venice, where the heavy craft, massy in build and massy in sail, and disorderly in aquatic
economy, reach with their mast-vanes only to the first stories of the huge marble palaces they anchor among.
It was very strange to me, after this, knowing that whatever was brave and strong in the English sailor was
concentrated in our Deal boatmen, to walk along [55]that trim strip of conventional beach, which the sea itself
seems to wash in a methodical manner, one shingle-step at a time; and by its thin toy-like boats, each with its
head to sea, at regular intervals, looking like things that one would give a clever boy to play with in a pond,
when first he got past petticoats; and the row of lath cots behind, all tidiness and telegraph, looking as if the
whole business of the human race on earth was to know what o'clock it was, and when it would be high
water,—only some slight weakness in favor of grog being indicated here and there by a
hospitable-looking open door, a gay bow-window, and a sign intimating that it is a sailor's duty to be not only
accurate, but "jolly."
Turner was always fond of this neat, courageous, benevolent, merry, methodical Deal. He painted it very
early, in the Southern Coast series, insisting on one of the tavern windows as the principal subject, with a
flash of forked lightning streaming beyond it out at sea like a narrow flag. He has the same association in his
mind in the present plate; disorder and distress among the ships on the left, with the boat going out to help
them; and the precision of the little town stretching in sunshine along the beach.
XI.—DEAL. 30
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
[56]
XII.—SCARBOROUGH.
I have put this plate last in the series, thinking that the reader will be glad to rest in its morning quietness, after
so much tossing among the troubled foam. I said in the course of the introduction, that nothing is so perfectly
calm as Turner's calmness; and I know very few better examples of this calmness than the plate before us,
uniting, as it does, the glittering of the morning clouds, and trembling of the sea, with an infinitude of peace in
both. There are one or two points of interest in the artifices by which the intense effect of calm is produced.
Much is owing, in the first place, to the amount of absolute gloom obtained by the local blackness of the boats
on the beach; like a piece of the midnight left unbroken by the dawn. But more is owing to the treatment of
the distant harbor mouth. In general, throughout nature, Reflection and Repetition are peaceful things; that is
to say, the image of any object, seen in calm water, gives us an impression of quietness, not merely because
we know the water must be quiet in order to be reflective; but because the fact of the repetition of this form is
lulling to us in its monotony, and associated more or less with an idea of quiet succession, or reproduction, in
events or things throughout nature:—that one day should be like another day, one town the image of
another town, or one history the repetition of another history, being more or less results of quietness, while
dissimilarity and non-succession are also, more or less, results of interference and disquietude. And thus,
though an echo actually increases the quantity of sound heard, its repetition of the notes or syllables of sound,
gives an idea of calmness attainable in no other way; hence [57]the feeling of calm given to a landscape by the
notes of the cuckoo. Understanding this, observe the anxious doubling of every object by a visible echo or
shadow throughout this picture. The grandest feature of it is the steep distant cliff; and therefore the dualism is
more marked here than elsewhere; the two promontories or cliffs, and two piers below them, being arranged
so that the one looks almost like the shadow of the other, cast irregularly on mist. In all probability, the more
distant pier would in reality, unless it is very greatly higher than the near one, have been lowered by
perspective so as not to continue in the same longitudinal line at the top,—but Turner will not have it
so; he reduces them to exactly the same level, so that the one looks like the phantom of the other; and so of the
cliffs above.
Then observe, each pier has, just below the head of it, in a vertical line, another important object, one a buoy,
and the other a stooping figure. These carry on the double group in the calmest way, obeying the general law
of vertical reflection, and throw down two long shadows on the near beach. The intenseness of the parallelism
would catch the eye in a moment, but for the lighthouse, which breaks the group and prevents the artifice from
being too open. Next come the two heads of boats, with their two bowsprits, and the two masts of the one
XII.—SCARBOROUGH. 31
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
farthest off, all monotonously double, but for the diagonal mast of the nearer one, which again hides the
artifice. Next, put your finger over the white central figure, and follow the minor incidents round the beach;
first, under the lighthouse, a stick, with its echo below a little to the right; above, a black stone, and its echo to
the right; under the white figure, another stick, with its echo to the left; then a starfish,[X] and a white spot its
echo to the left; then a dog, and a basket to double its light; above, a fisherman, and his wife for an echo;
above them, two lines of curved [58]shingle; above them, two small black figures; above them, two
unfinished ships, and two forked masts; above the forked masts, a house with two gables, and its echo exactly
over it in two gables more; next to the right, two fishing-boats with sails down; farther on, two fishing-boats
with sails up, each with its little white reflection below; then two larger ships, which, lest his trick should be
found out, Turner puts a dim third between; then below, two fat colliers, leaning away from each other, and
two thinner colliers, leaning towards each other; and now at last, having doubled everything all round the
beach, he gives one strong single stroke to gather all together, places his solitary central white figure, and the
Calm is complete.
It is also to be noticed, that not only the definite repetition has a power of expressing serenity, but even the
slight sense of confusion induced by the continual doubling is useful; it makes us feel not well awake, drowsy,
and as if we were out too early, and had to rub our eyes yet a little, before we could make out whether there
were really two boats or one.
I do not mean that every means which we may possibly take to enable ourselves to see things double, will be
always the most likely to insure the ultimate tranquillity of the scene, neither that any such artifice as this
would be of avail, without the tender and loving drawing of the things themselves, and of the light that bathes
them; nevertheless the highest art is full of these little cunnings, and it is only by the help of them that it can
succeed in at all equaling the force of the natural impression.
One great monotony, that of the successive sigh and vanishing of the slow waves upon the sand, no art can
render to us. Perhaps the silence of early light, even on the "field dew consecrate" of the grass itself, is not so
tender as the lisp of the sweet belled lips of the clear waves in their following patience. We will leave the
shore as their silver fringes fade upon it, desiring thus, as far as may be, to remember the sea. We have
regarded it perhaps too often as an enemy [59]to be subdued; let us, at least this once, accept from it, and from
the soft light beyond the cliffs above, the image of the state of a perfect Human Spirit,—
[B] By this time (1877) the plates had become considerably worn, and were accordingly "retouched" by Mr.
Chas. A. Tomkins. But such retouching proved worse than useless. The delicacy of the finer work had entirely
vanished, and the plates remained but a ghost of their former selves, such as no one would recognize as doing
justice to Turner. The fifth is unquestionably the least satisfactory of the five original editions containing
Lupton's engravings.
[C] Mr. E. Gambart (who is still living) states that, to the best of his recollection, he paid Mr. Ruskin 150
guineas for his work. Probably this was the price originally agreed upon, the two Turner drawings being
ultimately accepted as a more welcome and appropriate form of remuneration.
FOOTNOTES: 32
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
[F] The accompanying illustration is a facsimile of the portion of the proof-sheet described
above—slightly reduced to fit the smaller page.
[K] I am not quite sure of this, not having studied with any care the forms of mediæval shipping; but in all the
MSS. I have examined the sails of the shipping represented are square.
[L] It is not a little strange that in all the innumerable paintings of Venice, old and modern, no notice whatever
had been taken of these sails, though they are exactly the most striking features of the marine scenery around
the city, until Turner fastened upon them, painting one important picture, "The Sun of Venice," entirely in
their illustration.
[N] As in the very beautiful picture of this year's Academy, "The Abandoned."
[O] The catenary and other curves of tension which a sail assumes under the united influence of the wind, its
own weight, and the particular tensions of the various ropes by which it is attached, or against which it
presses, show at any moment complexities of arrangement to which fidelity, except after the study of a
lifetime, is impossible.
[P] "The town of Lyons, seated upon a chariot drawn by two lions, lifts its eyes towards heaven, and admires
there—'les nouveaux Epoux,'—represented in the character of Jupiter and Juno."—Notice
des Tableaux du Musée Impérial, 2nde partie, Paris, 1854, p. 235.
"The Queen upon her throne holds with one hand the scepter, in the other the balance. Minerva and Cupid are
at her sides. Abundance and Prosperity distribute metals, laurels, 'et d'autres récompenses,' to the Genii of the
Fine Arts. Time, crowned with the productions of the seasons, leads France to the—Age of
Gold!"—p. 239.
So thought the Queen, and Rubens, and the Court. Time himself, "crowned with the productions of the
seasons," was, meanwhile, as Thomas Carlyle would have told us, "quite of another opinion."
With view of arrival at Golden Age all the sooner, the Court determine to go by water; "and Marie de Medicis
gives to her son the government of the state, under the emblem of a vessel, of which he holds the rudder."
This piece of royal pilotage, being on the whole the most characteristic example I remember of the
Mythological marine above alluded to, is accordingly recommended to the reader's serious attention.
[Q] See the farther explanation of this practice in the notice of the subject of "Portsmouth."
FOOTNOTES: 33
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
[R] I think I shall be generally more intelligible by explaining what I mean in this way, and run less chance of
making myself ridiculous in the eyes of sensible people, than by displaying the very small nautical knowledge
I possess. My sailor friends will perhaps be gracious enough to believe that I could call these sails by their
right names if I liked.
[S] I have discovered, since this was written, that the design was made from a vigorous and interesting sketch
by Mr. S. Cousins, in which the rainbow and most of the ships are already in their places. Turner was,
therefore, in this case, as I have found him in several other instances, realizing, not a fact seen by himself, but
a fact as he supposed it to have been seen by another.
[T] It was left unfinished at his death, and I would not allow it to be touched afterwards, desiring that the
series should remain as far as possible in an authentic state.
[U] The sail seen, edge on, like a white sword, at the head of the ship.
[V] Not, let me say with all due honor to him, the careful and skillful engraver of these plates, who has been
much more tormented than helped by Turner's alterations.
[X] I have mentioned elsewhere that Turner was fond of this subject of Scarborough, and that there are four
drawings of it by him, if not more, under different effects, having this much common to the four, that there is
always a starfish on the beach.
End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin
*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE HARBOURS OF ENGLAND ***
Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
FOOTNOTES: 34
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.
FOOTNOTES: 35
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
FOOTNOTES: 36
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.net),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
FOOTNOTES: 37
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
1.F.
FOOTNOTES: 38
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
FOOTNOTES: 39
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
FOOTNOTES: 40
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Harbours of England, by John Ruskin.
approach us with offers to donate.
Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
http://www.gutenberg.net
FOOTNOTES: 41