This letter from Patrick Kasson requests an immediate pre-hearing conference to set a hearing date in the case of Moore vs. City of Chillicothe. Kasson notes that Mr. Moore's counsel has failed to participate in scheduling efforts so far, missing the previous pre-hearing conference. Kasson also expresses concern over an upcoming agenda item to discuss placing Mr. Moore on paid administrative leave prior to a merit hearing, which Kasson argues would be inappropriate and in violation of Ohio law. The letter renews the city's request for a pre-hearing conference to schedule a hearing date.
This letter from Patrick Kasson requests an immediate pre-hearing conference to set a hearing date in the case of Moore vs. City of Chillicothe. Kasson notes that Mr. Moore's counsel has failed to participate in scheduling efforts so far, missing the previous pre-hearing conference. Kasson also expresses concern over an upcoming agenda item to discuss placing Mr. Moore on paid administrative leave prior to a merit hearing, which Kasson argues would be inappropriate and in violation of Ohio law. The letter renews the city's request for a pre-hearing conference to schedule a hearing date.
This letter from Patrick Kasson requests an immediate pre-hearing conference to set a hearing date in the case of Moore vs. City of Chillicothe. Kasson notes that Mr. Moore's counsel has failed to participate in scheduling efforts so far, missing the previous pre-hearing conference. Kasson also expresses concern over an upcoming agenda item to discuss placing Mr. Moore on paid administrative leave prior to a merit hearing, which Kasson argues would be inappropriate and in violation of Ohio law. The letter renews the city's request for a pre-hearing conference to schedule a hearing date.
VIA EMAIL: [email protected] Rev. Olie Burton 85 Autumn Woods Drive Chillicothe, OH VIA EMAIL: [email protected] Mike Warren 491 S. Pohlman Rd., Apt. 5 Chillicothe, OH
VIA EMAIL: [email protected] Anna Villarreal Jenkins 2 West Main Street Chillicothe, OH
Re: Moore vs. City of Chillicothe Case No.: 14CI000402 Reminger File No.: 4172-21235C
Dear Commissioners:
I wish to follow up my prior correspondence in this matter. As you will recall, the following has occurred:
1. More than two weeks ago, when I entered my appearance, I requested, on behalf of the City, an immediate scheduling hearing to set the hearing date in this matter.
2. After some delay and difficulty contacting Mr. Moores counsel, a Pre-Hearing Conference was set with Commissioner Warren presiding for September 25, 2014.
3. The Conference was confirmed with Mr. Moores counsels office.
4. On September 25th, despite repeated phone calls to him, Mr. Moores counsel did not attend the Conference and thus, a hearing date could not be set.
5. During that week, I placed several phone calls to Mr. Moores counsel but had not received any response. Subsequent to the Conference, in which Mr. Moores counsel did not show up, I wrote him a letter expressing my dismay at his refusal to participate in the scheduling of the hearing. He then called me the following week. I returned his call, but have yet to hear from him again.
6. Over the last week, I corresponded with Commissioner Warren requesting that another Pre-Hearing Conference be scheduled, immediately this week, so that a hearing date could be picked. Mr. Warren indicated he was out of town later this week and would be unable to do so. I inquired as to whether another Commissioner could handle the hearing, and Mr. Warren never responded.
I, once again, on behalf of the City, request that an immediate Pre-Hearing Conference be scheduled so that a hearing date can be set. The City has been requesting this for some time.
In addition, I have received an agenda for next Tuesday. The agenda seems to suggest that the Commission will consider placing Mr. Moore on paid administrative leave prior to a merit hearing. This is inappropriate for two reasons. First, Mr. Moores counsel has refused to participate in the hearing scheduling process and Mr. Moore should not be rewarded for this. Second, such a decision is specifically precluded by Ohio law. Prior to a merit hearing, the Commission has no authority to issue opinions or render decisions related to the reduction, suspension or removal of an employee. R.C. 124.40(A); 124.34(A). In short, any decision to place Mr. Moore on paid administrative leave, prior to the hearing on the merits, would be void as the Commission lacks jurisdiction to do so. Id.
Once again, I renew the Citys request for an immediate Pre-Hearing Conference so that a hearing date can be set.
Very truly yours,
Pat
Patrick Kasson
DPK/sf cc: Jack A. Everson, Mayor (jack.everson.ci.chillicothe.oh.us) Sherry Rutherford, Law Director ([email protected]) Paige J. McMahon, Esq. ([email protected])
Ga Bar Compliant Against Alan Lowe in Withholding of Documents in The Civil Case and Violation of My Rights To A Speedy Trial in The Illegal Arrest by The Pooler PD
The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio (Local 2201) v. International Air Service of Puerto Rico, Inc., 636 F.2d 848, 1st Cir. (1980)