Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raudhah Ded Piai
Raudhah Ded Piai
1
CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY FOR THE
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF
ACCESS ROAD FROM KUKUP TO TANJUNG PIAI, PONTIAN, JOHOR
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The Request for Proposal (RFP) clearly identifies the scope of services to achieve the objectives
of the project which is to prepare the detailed design and tender documents for the Proposed
Upgrading of Access Road from Kukup to Tanjung Piai, Johor.
This report outlines the scope of works, approach and methodology for the Civil and Structural
engineering Consultancy for the Detailed Engineering Design for the Proposed Upgrading of Access
Road From Kukup to Tanjung Piai, Pontian, Johor
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
ISKANDAR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (IRDA) has expressed its intention to invite
Jurutera Perunding Putra (The Consultant) to submit Technical and Financial Proposal for Civil and
Structural engineering Consultancy for the Detailed Engineering Design for the Proposed Upgrading of
Access Road From Kukup to Tanjung Piai, Pontian, Johor through their letter dated 9
th
April 2014 (Ref:
IRDA.P&P.600-2/2/2012/6-35(A)(06)).
The Iskandar Regional Development Authority (IRDA) was established in Feb 2007 under the
IRDA Act 2007 to regulate and co-ordinate the various parties in the public and private sectors
to realise the vision of developing the Iskandar Malaysia into a strong and sustainable
metropolis of International standing.
As one of the projects planned to be implemented in the RMK-10, the project is aimed at
improving the connectivity to and from Tanjung Piai and Kukup for better accessibility as one of
the enablers to establish Johor Ramsar as a prime tourist destination. The upgrading will
improve the current single lane dual carriageway to Tanjung Piai. The proposed location is
approximately 20 km from the Pontian Kecil Town to Pekan Kukup and it can easily be accessed
via federal road 95.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
2
Figure 1: General Site Location
The study/project area will involve state road J111 (CH0 to CH9000). The project construction
cost is estimated at RM 26,100,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia Twenty Six Million and Hundred
Thousand Only)
3.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
As stated in the Terms of References (TOR) of the RFP, the Consultant is to produce detailed
engineering design for the Proposed Upgrading of Access from Kukup to Tanjung Piai, Johor
Bahru, Johor. Among the works to be carried out by the Consultant are:
a) To carry out detailed engineering design of the road upgrading works as per preliminary
design approved by JKR during the study period.
b) The work shall cover widening of the roads, analysis of the existing soil condition, slope
stabilization work, drainage work, and any other related design component.
c) The utility mapping is required to determine the extent of relocation works and to assess
the cost of such works.
d) The works shall also include the reinstatement of improvement if required, of the street
lighting of comply with the requirement of JKR.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
3
e) The works include the appointment and coordination and supervision of any Specialist
Consultant required to supplement the detailed design works, or as required by the
Authority, or as part of the best engineering practice.
f) The consultant work include obtaining all clearance and approval from all relevant
Authority and to act upon all instruction from the Authority and to act upon all
instructions from the Authority to ensure compliance.
The detailed design of the said works shall also include specialist/third parties consultant who
shall be coordinated and supervised by the Consulting Engineer. The specialist/third party
consultants are as follow:
a. Land Surveyor,
b. Geotechnical and Soil Investigation Work
c. Road Safety Audit
d. Utility Mapping Surveyor
e. Independent Checker
3.1 Approach
The general approach is to commence the Proposed Upgrading of Access from Kukup to Tanjung
Piai, Johor Bahru, Johor. based on the Terms of Reference (TOR). The available information and
data collected will be reviewed and taken into consideration in each design proposal, so that the
proposed upgrading works will be in the best in relation to the actual functional requirements
for the site.
3.2 Methodology
Jurutera Perunding Putra proposes that the services should be broken up into three (3) stages
namely;
Part 1 - Review Stage (1.0 months)
- Involves the collection/ review of existing and available data and also
the need of new data etc.
Part 2 - Detailed Design Stage (4.0 months)
- Covers the analysis, modeling and detailed design of the road
upgrading works including preparation of preliminary cost estimate.
Part 3 - Tender Stage (1.0 months)
Jurutera Perunding Putra
4
- Involve preparation of pre-qualification document, specifications and
tender documents
3.2.1 Part 1 Review Stage (1.0 month)
Jurutera Perunding Putra proposes that the first one (1) month of the project duration shall
focus on collection of existing and new data and also site reconnaissance. This shall include the
following task:
a. Route Location
b. Engineering Survey
c. Hydrological and Hydro-geological Investigation
d. Geological Investigation
e. Utility Survey
3.2.1.1 Route Location
The Consultant will liaise with the IRDA, State/District JKR, Majlis Daerah Pontian and the Land
Office on the proposed route of the road upgrading works. Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran (JPS)
shall also be liaison on the requirement of hydrological and hydraulic study/analysis for the
project area. Other relevant authorities such as Syarikat Air Johor Holdings (SAJH), Tenaga
Nasional Berhad (TNB), Telekom Malaysia Berhad (TELEKOM) and any other will also be
approached by the Consultant to identify existing utilities located along the proposed route.
Photo 1 to 2 shows general view of the existing road that need to be upgraded at various
locations.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
5
Photo 1: Overview of Existing Kukup-Tanjung Piai Road at Pekan Permas
Photo 2: Overview of Existing Kukup-Tanjung Piai Road at Kg. Serkat
Jurutera Perunding Putra
6
3.2.1.2 Engineering Survey
Our services will also include the planning, coordination and supervision of the detailed
engineering land survey that will be carried out by a Licensed Surveyor appointed by the
Consultant. These works will cover topographical and road alignment survey.
Engineering survey is proposed to be completed within the first months of the commencement
of the Review Stage period. The survey corridor shall cover the Right of Way (ROW) of the
proposed route. However, this task shall depend on the review of available survey data that will
be provided by IRDA upon commencement of the project. The engineering survey will only be
carried out in the event that the available data is insufficient for the detailed design.
Generally, the Surveyor will perform all field survey work necessary to locate accurately
the locations and dimensions of the following features within the proposed corridor for survey
of::-
a. Existing roads, tracks and paths.
b. Existing structures above and below the ground level indicating whether temporary,
semi-permanent or permanent and whether dwelling, industrial or other use, type of
construction and any other relevant particulars.
c. Existing drains including their type of construction.
d. Existing watermains, TNB and Telecom overhead lines, Telecom manholes,
fire hydrants, pylons etc.
e. Existing rivers, water courses and their discharge directions.
f. Existing vegetation, their types and swamps.
g. Boundaries of individual lots and their lot numbers and the baseline from
which reference can be made, preferably to tie up with existing boundary stones.
h. Highest known flood level
The Surveyor will establish temporary benchmarks at approximately 1 km intervals and relate
it to Survey Department Datum (Ordinance Datum). Reduced levels of these temporary bench
marks shall be clearly and legibly inscribed on the marks and referenced for identification for
the subsequent construction stage. The location of all bench marks must be clearly described
and indicated on the plans to be sub-mitted. All these TBMs shall be located well away from the
construction limits. All leveling shall be done in sections of approximately I km in length. The
closing error for each section shall not exceed16 mm and the equipment used must be capable
of executing the works to this degree of accuracy. The maximum error in spot levels
Jurutera Perunding Putra
7
shall not both exceed 0.02 K metres where K is the horizontal distance in kilometres from
the nearest Permanent Bench Mark.
Surveys at Bridges and Culvert Sites
The Surveyor shall survey all streams, rivers and water-courses crossing the line of the
routes. These include all watercourses whether there is water or no water flow at the time
of surveying. The survey shall extend to the following distances on either side of the route
centre-lines. (distances measured along the channels).
Rivers exceeding 15m width .... 150m
Streams less than 15m width .... 30m
The locations of channel edges and other significant features shall be recorded and levels
shall be taken along the bank slopes and channel inverts at intervals of 3m. A minimum of 3
cross-sections showing all significant changes of level are required at both sides of the
channel. The cross sections, one of which shall be taken along the route-line shall extend to
a distance not less than 30m from the bank tops on either side of the stream. The Surveyor
shall record the maximum flood level at each river crossing. Existing water surface at
suitable points shall be taken along the channel. Each reading shall be taken at intervals not
exceeding one hour. The Surveyor shall indicate on the Plan and Longitudinal Profile the
chainage and reduced level of the lowest point of all depressions along the route including
direction of flow.
Details of Junctions to Existing Roads
The Surveyor shall survey all junctions to enable the Consultant to design the junction
properly. Cross-sections shall be of 25 metres intervals with a corridor width of 40m and
shall be taken for a distance not less than 150 metres up and down the proposed
intersection of the road or as required by Client.
Demarcation of Road Right-of-Way (R.O.W.)
The Surveyor shall demarcate the road right-of-way (R.O.W.) if so required by the Client. In
the case of new alignment the R.O.W. shall be demarcated using G.I. pipes 50mm diameter
embedded in concrete of dimension 250mm x250mm x 450mm. The pipe shall be 1.20 m in
Jurutera Perunding Putra
8
length of which 0.80 m shall protrude above ground level. The pipes shall also be painted
and shall be placed at intervals of every 100 m.
3.2.1.3 Material Survey and Subsurface Investigation
To carry out the detailed design of the said project, Jurutera Perunding Putra will, as required,
carry out a review of the available Soil Investigation (SI) data comprised of Borehole Testing,
Mackintosh Probe and Pavement Evaluation Test that will be given by IRDA. In the event of
insufficient SI data, Jurutera Perunding Putra will propose, coordinate and supervised the
subsurface investigation, sampling and testing to gather enough data for the Detailed
Engineering Design. These works are expected to be completed within the first two (2) months
upon the commencement of the Review Stage period.
Soil Investigation (SI) works shall be carried out in compliance and in accordance to the
following:
a. BS 5930:1981 Site Investigation,
b. BS 1377: 1990 Method of Test for Soils for Civil Engeering Purposes,
c. JKR Standard Specification for SI works
Generally, the SI comprises of the following scope of works:
a. Boreholes (average every 2km interval)
b. Mackintosh probes (average every 500m interval)
c. Laboratory Testing
d. Pavement Evaluation
Asphalt Coring and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) (average every 1km interval)
Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) test (at interval 200m)
Surface Condition Survey
3.2.1.4 Hydrological and Hydro-geological Investigation
Jurutera Perunding Putra will carry out hydrological and hydraulic investigation using up-to-
date computer-aided modeling and manual techniques. The findings will provide an effective
appreciation of the inundation and drainage problems in the Project Area and serve as basis for
the detailed design stage.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
9
The hydrological/hydraulic design procedures to be adopted for urban storm drains, drainage
structures and other storm water control facilities in the study is in accordance with the
recommendations available in the JPSs new Urban Stormwater Management Manual for
Malaysia (2012) (MSMA, 2nd Edition, 2012) and also Hydrological Procedures.
Topographic maps published in 1991 by the Survey Department in hardcopy format, which
posses the contours of 20m interval with a scale of 1 in 50,000 shall be used for defining the
catchment boundaries and physical catchment characteristics.
3.2.1.5 Utility Mapping
Accurate information regarding the existing underground utilities is required in the planning,
installation of new utilities and excavation of existing utilities. Lack of knowledge on this may
result in fatality and catastrophic damages of existing underground utilities and disruption to
utility services.
Utility Mapping is the process of accurately surveying and plotting the position and depth of the
detected Utilities. Utility Mapping shall include accurately locating and identifying the pipes,
cables and ducting of buried utilities, including but not limited to electricity, gas, water,
communications, sewers and drainage.
Fixed features on the ground such as kerb lines, building outlines, access chambers shall be
shown in the utility mapping drawing so the underground information can be easily referenced
to the above ground fixed features. Drawings are presented in electronic dwg or dxf files. They
can be produced as original drawings or incorporated into existing site or utility drawings as a
separate layer in AutoCAD format.
Generally, the typical tasks to be undertaken by the utility surveyor shall include but not limited
to the following:
a. Search for existing utility records to assist in identifying utility owners that may have
facilities on or to be affected by the project,
b. Collect relevant records from utility owner including previous construction plans,
direct-buried cable records, as-built drawings etc,
c. Locating and identifying the pipes, cables and ducting of buried utilities, including but
not limited to electricity, gas, water, communications, sewers and drainage.
d. Produce softcopy and hardcopy drawings
Jurutera Perunding Putra
10
Underground utility need to be detected continuously every 20m along the proposed route. The
frequency of utility detection shall be increased in following circumstances:
When the underground utility connected with the part that exposed on the ground.
Change of direction
In area that is packed with utilities.
Photo 3 and 4 shows existing utilities along the proposed route.
Photo 3: Existing Utility Located along Kukup-Tanjung Piai Road
Jurutera Perunding Putra
11
Photo 4: Existing Culvert and SAJH Pipe Crossing
3.2.2 Part 2 - Detailed Design Stage (4.5 months)
Part 2 of the project shall commence upon completion of the Review Stage. At this stage, all
preliminary information on the route location, engineering survey, geotechnical survey, utility
mapping survey and also hydrological and hydraulic study shall be completed.
The detailed design stage will include the following:
a. Engineering Design
- Geometric Design
- Drainage Design
b. Geotechnical Design
c. Pavement Design
d. Bridges (if any)
e. Culverts
f. Retaining Walls
g. Intersection/Interchange Design
h. Street Lighting Design
i. Traffic Control Devices/Roadside Furniture
Jurutera Perunding Putra
12
j. Relocation of Services
k. Landscaping
l. Environmental Protection
m. Temporary Works or Diversion and Traffic Management
n. Tunnels
o. Access
p. Road Safety Audit
3.2.2.1 Engineering Design
The road geometry and bridge layouts if any will cater the predicted traffic demand and at the
same time giving consideration to economic solution and aesthetic values. The road designs will
be carried out in accordance to the following design procedures and standards:
a) A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads
Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8/86
b) A Guide on the Design of Interchanges
Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 12/87
c) A Guide on the Design of At-Grade Interchanges
Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 11/87
d) A Guide on the Design of Traffic Signals
Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 13/87
e) A Guide to the Design of Pavement
Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 5/85
f) Manual on Traffic Control Devices Standard Traffic Signs
- Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2A/85
g) Guide Signs Design and Application
- Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2E/87
h) Bridge Design BS: 5400: Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges
i) BD 37/88: Loads for Highway Bridges
a. Geometric Design
The proposed cross-sections and standard will be based on the traffic demand and level
of service predicted and previous study approved by JKR.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
13
The consultant will prepare the basic geometric design the alignment identified in the
project location. The geometric design will adopt standard set by JKR as per Arahan
Teknik (Jalan) 8/86 A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads.
b. Drainage Design
One of the most important aspects in designing highways/roads is the necessity for
providing adequate drainage. Adequate and economical drainage is absolutely essential
for the protection of the investment made in a highway structure and for safe-guarding
the lives of the community.
The design of all drainage structure will be based on relevant guidelines and criteria
established by JKR and standards published by Department of Irrigation and Drainage.
Element of the drainage design will include roadside and sub-soil drainage. Design
criteria of the drainage system as follows:
i. The size of culverts shall be designed to cater the discharges from
surrounding area. All drains and culverts shall be designed to channel out
sufficient capacity such as main drains or rivers.
ii. Culverts crossing are to be designed for a flood return period of 50-years
with headwater depth not exceeding two times the diameter of the culverts.
iii. Surface drains are to be designed for a flood return period of 5-years with
adequate provisions for removal of carriageway surface water, erosion
protection, and slope stabilization.
iv. The structure design for culverts shall follow BS 5400 and BD 31/87.
All drainage design shall follow the guidelines and criteria established by JKR, REAM
guidelines Guidelines for Road Drainage Design (REAM GL 3/2002 and REAM GL
3/2004) as well as standards published by Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran (JPS).
Jurutera Perunding Putra
14
3.2.2.2 Geotechnical Design
The scope of geo-technical design shall include embankment design, slope stability
analysis, foundation design for bridges and culverts design of earth retaining structures,
earthworks design and any other necessary geo-technical design.
Design Codes and Standards
Design brief criteria that relevant codes/ standards were referred to for the
criteria on above checks are
i. Subsurface Investigation
a) Site Investigation BS5930:1981
ii. Foundations and Excavations
a) Foundations BS 8004:1986
b) Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations, Meyerhof,
Terzaghi Lecture, ASCE, March 1976.
iii. Slope Problems
a) JKR 21500-00111-10 published (Jan 2010) Guidelines for Slope
Design.
b) Geotechnical Manual for Slopes GCO, 1984, Hong Kong
iv. Retaining Structures
a) Earth Retaining Structures BS8002:1994
b) Strengthened / reinforced soils and other fills BS8006:1995
v. Earthworks
a) Earthworks BS6031:1981
3.2.2.3 Pavement Design
The pavement design of the road is the process to determine suitable thickness of
various layers so that it can carry traffic loading to its design lifetime. Besides, other
relevant factors such as soil properties, economy of design and practical considerations
with regard to the suitability of material are taken into account in the pavement design
Jurutera Perunding Putra
15
for this study. The principle elements in this process are the choice of suitable materials
and their thickness for each pavement layer.
The following key information should be considered for design of pavement. Such
information should be evaluated before finalizing the pavement structure. There are as
follows:
a. Types and volume of commercial vehicle for which the structure is designed.
a. Design lifetime.
b. Type and strength of subgrade.
c. Types and properties of paving materials used.
d. Environment to which the pavement structure will be exposed.
Many factors or variables that influence the performance of a pavement, a systematic
approach to pavement design is recommended. Pavement design will be carried out in
accordance with JKR Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 5/85 A Guide to the Design of Pavement
or other approved procedures.
3.2.2.4 Bridges (if any)
a. Hydraulic Design of Bridge
Bridge will be designed to for 100-year flood protection level. Design discharge at the
proposed bridge location is determined in accordance with various flow estimation
hydrological procedures published by JPS. The bridge waterway area to be provided
should be sufficient to ensure the design flood can safely pass through without
excessive increase in upstream flood levels and at a velocity which will not increase
scour. Design Criteria adopted in the bridge design as below:-
i. Minimum freeboard- 1.00m above design high water level
ii. Minimum Design Velocity - 0.80 m/s
iii. Maximum Design Velocity - 4.00 m/s
iv. Manning Roughness Coefficient - 0.025 (Natural Stream)
b. Structural Design of Bridge
The bridge structure shall be designed in accordance with Malaysian and British
Codes of Practice. In cases where the above-mentioned standards are not applicable,
other internationally accepted design standards shall be adopted. The design shall be
based on:
Jurutera Perunding Putra
16
i. Structural Design to the latest version of BS 5400: Steel, Concrete and
Composite Bridges.
ii. Bridge loading based on BD 37/01 Loads for Highway Bridges.
iii. Integral bridges shall follow BA 42/96 Amendment No. 1: The design of
Integral Bridges.
iv. Foundations shall follow BS 8004: Foundation.
v. BS 8002: Code of Practice for Earth-Retaining Structures.
vi. Reinforced earth walls shall follow BD 3/78: Reinforced and Anchored Earth
Retaining Walls and Bridge Abutments for Embankments (Rev. 1987)
vii. Vehicle impact shall follow BD 60/04: Design of Highway Bridges for Vehicle
Collision Loads.
viii. Ship impact: shall establish appropriate ship collision force and shall follow the
latest version of AASHTO Guide Specification and Commentary for Vessel
Collision Design of Highway Bridges 1991.
ix. Parapets shall be in accordance to BD 52/93: The Design of Highway Bridge
Parapets and in compliance to Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 1/85 (Pindaan 1/89)
Manual on Guardrail of Longitudinal Traffic Barrier.
x. Expansion joints shall be accordance to BD 33/94 Expansion Joints for Use in
Highway Bridge Deck.
The Bridge will be designed with a minimum free board 1m above the 100 years high
water level in compliance with the latest JPS requirements. For bridge over road, the
vertical and horizontal clearance shall be based on relevant road authorities.
The structural design for R.C culverts shall comply by BS 8110 Structural Use of
Concrete. The loading shall follow the requirements for bridge. Culverts shall be
designed to resist the worst traffic load as for the bridge structures.
3.2.2.5 Culverts
Culverts will be designed to allow for 50-year flood (subject to approval and latest
requirement by JPS). Single box culvert is proposed with minimum height of 1.5m for
ease of maintenance. Design Criteria are adhered in the culvert design as below:-
i. Minimum fill cover for RCP - 0.40 meter
ii. Minimum size of RCP - 1.50 meter
Jurutera Perunding Putra
17
iii. Minimum Design Velocity - 0.80 m/s
iv. Maximum Design Velocity - 4.00 m/s
Different types of culvert bedding will be proposed depends on the foundation soils
and heights of road fill
3.2.2.6 Retaining Walls
Retaining walls are usually built to hold back soil mass. However, retaining walls can
also be constructed for aesthetic landscaping purposes. Retaining walls are
structures that are constructed to retail soil or any such materials which are unable
to stand vertically by themselves. They are also provided to maintain the grounds at
two different levels.
The following factors of safety (FOS) are typically used for retaining wall design:
Sliding = FOS 1.5 (active earth pressure conditions)
= FOS 2.0 (passive earth pressure conditions)
Overturning = FOS 1.5
Retaining wall will be designed in accordance with BS 8002:1994 Code of practice for
earth retaining structures.
3.2.2.7 Intersection/Interchange Design
Traffic study at the intersections shall be carried out by a third party. The outcome
and recommendation from the study shall decide whether there is a need to signalize
or otherwise.
For major intersection, median and traffic signal and if the pedestrian traffic is high
(subject to study), pedestrian crossing shall be provided at the junction. For minor
intersections, acceleration, deceleration and slip lanes shall be provided. For both
cases the relevant road furniture and signage shall be incorporated.
The design shall be based on:
a. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 11/87 a guide to the design of At-Grade intersection
b. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 12/87 A guide to the design of Interchange.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
18
3.2.2.8 Street Lighting Design
Due to safety matters, location of street lighting and type of material has a great
inuence to avoid any accidents and all their materials shall be approved by SIRIM
Malaysia. The Consultant will propose to IRDA and will carry out detailed design of
the street lighting upon approval by IRDA. The Consultant will also liaison closely
with TNB for the power supply and JKR Electrical Section on the design of the street
lighting.
3.2.2.9 Traffic Control Devices/Roadside Furniture
The designs of traffic control devices and road side furniture such as directional signs
and other traffic signs, lane and pavement markings, etc shall be based on:
i. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2A Manual On Traffic Devices: Standard Traffic Sign
ii. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2B Manual On Traffic Devices: Standard Sign Application
iii. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2C Manual On Traffic Control Devices: Standard
Temporary Signs and Work Zones Control
iv. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2D / 85 Manual On Traffic Control Devices: Road
Markings and Delination
v. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2E / 87 Manual On Traffic Control Devices: Guide Signs
and Design Application
vi. Guidelines On Traffic Control and Management Devices Pavement Marking and
Delination (REAM GL 8/2004)
vii. Guidelines On Design and Selection of Longitudinal Traffic Safety Barrier
(REAM GL 9/2006)
3.2.2.10 Relocation of Services
The utility mapping will be done during the first two (2) months upon
commencement of the project. Hence, the Consultant will liaise closely with relevant
authorities on the proposed future relocation of such services. Detailed plan for
relocation of services will be prepared if affected by the proposed work.
All official dealings with any services agency will be done through IRDA.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
19
Provision for new services will also be included in the design (if any). The Consultant
will also look into the possibility of temporary/deviation of the existing utilities
during construction.
3.2.2.11 Landscaping
Landscaping has signicant inuence on the safety performance of roadway. It can be
divided into two types:
Soft landscape (planting trees). The criteria of good soft landscape are:
- Not obstruct all sight lines in the roadside.
- Landscape tree size of the trunk shall not more than 100 mm.
- Can be used as barrier to headlight glare from opposing trafc.
- Shall have minimum 1.0 m clear distance from edge of road. Requirement for
planting trees shall be referred according to Garis Panduan Landskap
Negara published by Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung
Malaysia
Hard landscape (bollard).
- Bollard shall be from concrete type and 1.0 m of height.
The landscaping works shall be design in accordance to:
a) Garispanduan Lanskap Negara published by Jabatan Perancang Bandar
dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia
b) Intermediate Guidelines for Landscaping of Road Reserve published by JKR
Roads Branch
3.2.2.12 Environmental Protection
The legislation that is related to the prevention, abatement, control of pollution and
enhancement of the environment protection is stipulated in the Environmental
Quality Act 1974 (Amendment) 2007.
The Consultant will evaluate the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study and
incorporate the possible negative impacts on the existing environment along the
proposed route and in the immediate vicinity of the project.
Apart from compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (EQA) 1974 (Act 127)
and other related environmental legislations, the following Acts are also applicable
Jurutera Perunding Putra
20
based on its relevancy to the planning, design, construction, equipping and
commissioning of any project.
(a) National Land Code (Act 56 of 1965)
(b) Town and Country Planning Act 1976, (Act 172)
(c) Street, Drainage and Building Act, 1974: Act 133 and Amendment, 1978
(d) Protection of Wildlife Act, 1972 (Act 76)
(e) Forestry Act 1984 (Act 313)
(f) Land Conservation Act 1960 (Act 385)
(g) Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Act 514)
(h) Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Act 2007 (Act 672)
(i) Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982 (Act 267)
(j) Workers Minimum Amenities Act 1990 (Act 446)
(k) Local Government Act 1976 (Act 171)
(l) Road Traffic Volume 2008 (CD) Guidelines For The Enviroment Impact
Assessment Of Highway Road Project
3.2.2.13 Temporary Works or Diversion and Traffic Management
The Consultant will propose temporary works or diversions that will be able to cater
for the uninterrupted flow of traffic during the construction period. All traffic control
devices used will be in accordance with ArahanTeknik (Jalan) 2C/85 Temporary
Signs and Woks Zone Control.
The Consulting Engineer will also design the Traffic Management Plan and prepare
the Bill of Quantities for the Traffic Management as a basic for the Traffic
Management during the construction stage which will be submitted by the
contractor.
Road safety audit on the proposed temporary works and diversion works will also
being carried out by the Consultant to evaluate road safety potentials at the design
stage and at various times throughout the construction period.
3.2.2.14 Tunnels
Design of tunnels (if any) will comply with International Codes of Practices approved
by the Government and shall include the design of all ventilating, lighting and carbon
Jurutera Perunding Putra
21
monoxide warning systems and other facilities necessary to provide for a complete
operational and safe facility.
Design consideration for the tunnel design are as follows:
a. Design loading requirements for tunnel are in accordance with :
BS 5400 : Part 2 : 1378 and BD 31/87
b. Reinforced concrete design in accordance with BS 5400 : Pt.4, 1984.
c. Concrete characteristic strength at 28 days, fcu = 30 Mpa - 40 Mpa.
Figure 6 shows minimum clearance requirement by JKT for underpass/tunnel structure.
Figure 6: Clearance at Underpass
Jurutera Perunding Putra
22
3.2.2.15 Access
The access to all adjacent properties affected by the proposed road upgrading will
also be taken into consideration by the Consultant as well as for utility services in the
design of the bridges.
Photo 5: Access during construction period to the adjacent property that will be planned by the
Consultant
3.2.2.16 Road Safety Audit
The Specialist Consultant will carry out Road Safety Audit at the following stages of
implementation of the project:
a) Stage 1 DELETED
b) Stage 2 DELETED
c) Stage 3 Detailed Design
d) Stage 4 Pre-Opening
e) Stage 5 Operational (Existing)
Road Safety Audit Guideline Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 25/07 Guidelines On The
Contents Of A Road Safety Audit Report published by the JKR will be the basis in
Jurutera Perunding Putra
23
performing the audit. All reports of road safety audit will be submitted to IRDA for
approval and acceptance.
The Consultant will appoint third party who acquire the knowledge and experience in
Road Safety Audit as Auditor for this project. Further details on Road Safety Audit are
as follows:
a) Stage 1 Audit Done by Previous Consultant during Feasibility Study of the
Proposed Project
b) Stage 2 Audit Done by Previous Consultant during Feasibility Study of the
Proposed Project
c) Stage 3 Audit Detailed Design Stage
This Audit will be done at the appropriate stage towards the end of the detailed
design or as soon as it is possible to determine the safety implications of the
design and when changes can be made at the most opportune time to avoid
costly redesign. A separate audit checks will be necessary as various elements of
the project reach the desired stage of the design. The project will not proceed to
the construction stage until each of the safety items identified in Stage 3 has been
resolved
d) Stage 4 Audit Construction Stage
i. RSA Stage 4 (Part 1) or Verification Audit will be carry out after the
issuance of construction and traffic management drawings
ii. RSA Stage 4 (Part 2) will be carry out when the construction works
progress is about 50%
iii. RSA Stage 4 (Part 3) will be carry out during the pre-opening of the project
for both day and night.
Audit at this stage will include two distinct aspects as follows:
i. Audit of the traffic management through and in the vicinity of the project
during the construction stage. This will include audit of the traffic
management arrangements, both checking the relevant plans prior to the
works commencing and site inspection within 24 hours of the start of the
construction of any particular stage construction to ensure that the traffic
operation through and around the works is safe and effective for all road
users,
ii. Audit of the project itself, at appropriate times during the construction,
when aspect which detailed check of the project is required, just prior to it
being opened to traffic.
e) Stage 5 Audit Operational Stage
Jurutera Perunding Putra
24
The Audit at this stage will be carry out upon the road being opened to traffic.
The audit will involve site visits during the day and night, looking at drivers
behavior, analysis of accident data, general traffic management items, roadside
safety and landscaping, traffic signs, pavement markings and general layout
features. Emphasis will be given to major conflict points such as intersections
and/or interchanges which are known to have rates of accidents.
The deliverables of Road Safety Audit will be as follows:
a) Road Safety Audit Stage 3 Report (Detailed Design)
b) Auditors Compliance Audit (Consultants Response and Auditors
Compliance)
c) Road Safety Audit Stage 4 Part 1 Report (Verification and TMP)
d) Road Safety Audit Stage 4 Part 2 Report (Construction)
e) Road Safety Audit Stage 4 Part 3 Report (Pre-Opening)
f) Road Safety Audit Stage 5 Report (Operations)
All reports of Road Safety Audit will be submitted to IRDA for approval and
acceptance.
3.2.3 Part 3 - Tender Stage (0.5 months)
The Tender Stage will include the following tasks:
a. Preparation of Cost Estimate/ Bill of Quantities (BQ)
b. Preparation of Pre-Qualification Documents
c. Preparation of Specifications and Tender Documents
d. Evaluation of Tender
e. Post Tendering Services
The Consultant will prepare the cost estimates for the purpose of tender. It will be based on the
Bills of Quantities of the proposed construction works and current rates. The Bill of Quantities
(BQ) will follow the format approved by IRDA. The Consultant will also furnish taking-off sheets
for estimation of quantities in the BQ to IRDA.
The cost estimate for the proposed construction works will be treated as Private and
Confidential (P&C). Therefore, the Consultant will be submitting three (3) sets of the cost
estimate with endorsement to IRDA.
Jurutera Perunding Putra
25
The cost estimate for relocation of services identified along the proposed route will be prepared
separately.
Tender documents and specifications will be prepared according to the formats, standards and
procedures adopted by IRDA. This is to enable IRDA to invite tenders from eligible contractors
for the purpose of the construction. Hence, the Consultant will also prepare pre-qualification
document if instructed by IRDA complete with preparation evaluation criteria, carrying out the
evaluation and recommend to IRDA the suitable contractors for the pre-qualification exercise.
If instructed by IRDA, the Consultant will evaluate the tenders received from eligible tenderers,
prepare the tender evaluation report and to recommend to IRDA, the most suitable tenderer to
be appointed as the contractor for the construction within two (2) weeks upon receive the
submitted tenders.
The Consultant will also provide the following services if required by IRDA:
a. Make amendments to drawings or redesign any part of the works on the instruction of
IRDA. Any amendments or redesign carried out because of deficiencies or errors in the
Consulting Engineers design shall be at the expense of the Consulting Engineer and will
not be reimbursed.
b. Attend site meetings on the instructions of the IRDA.
The guidelines for tender document preparation will be in accordance with the following:
a. PWD Form 203 (Rev. 2007) Standard Form Of Contract To Be Used For Contract Based
On Drawing And Spesifications.
b. PWD Form 203A (Rev. 2007) Standard Form Of Contract To Be Used Where Bills Of
Quantities Form Part Of The Contract.
c. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 6/85 (Pind. 1/88) Guidelines For Pesentation Of Engineering
Drawings.