Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.
Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.
Case: Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. (2002, 9th) [pp. 553-560]
Issue: Whether the trial court was correct to deny Countrywide's petition to
compel arbitration, based on its unconscionability. Yes.
Notes
• Can an employer insist that all disputes arising btwn employer and employee be
mandated to go to arbitration?
• FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) - says if you sign an arbitration agreement, the
courts will enforce it, unless its unconscionable or if state law says it would be
unenforceable
○ Why would state law be applied? This is a federal question case (title
VII), but FAA says that this statute would not apply to contracts that would be
unenforceable under state law, so state law would be applied here.
• Distinction btwn procedural and substantive unconscionability
• Procedural test: if there is unequal bargaining power; that there's no
opportunity for meaningful negotiations
○ Countrywide says - well they had enough time to review the K
• Substantive test: terms so one-sided as to shock the conscious
○ Very vague standard
○ Court appears to fill it out with discussion
○ Discovery part itself not so one-sided, but part of a pattern