The Wine Jars Speak A Text Study
The Wine Jars Speak A Text Study
The Wine Jars Speak A Text Study
Eva-Lena Wahlberg
Uppsala 2012
MA thesis, Supervisor: Prof. Lana Troy
Uppsala University
Department of Archaeology and Ancient History
- Egyptology -
Eva-Lena Wahlberg
Uppsala 2012
MA thesis, Supervisor: Prof. Lana Troy
Abstract
Wahlberg, Eva-Lena 2012. The Wine Jars Speak: A text study. Reworked and translated from a Swedish MA thesis,
Vinkrlsetiketterna berttar: En textstudie from 2008 in Egyptology, Uppsala University.
This paper examines the texts written on shards from wine jars found at El-Amarna, Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62)
and Deir el-Medina. Information concerning the administration of wine and its production, found in these texts, is
examined. Wine was an important element in Egyptian society and a common iconographic motif in tombs at Thebes
during New Kingdom.
A survey on previous research on the subject is presented. This is followed by analysis of the different reoccurring
elements found in the texts. A definition of the standard formulation of the wine jar label texts is given and the
minimal level of information needed for the administration of wine production and distribution is identified.
The chapter of the analysis deals with the various types of information given in the label texts, such as date, wine
classification, and function. The next chapter presents the words associated with the vineyard, the names of the
institutions involved in the production and use of wine, and the place names that identify where wine production took
place. The following chapter deals with the titles and personal names of the officials involved in wine production.
This study shows that these small texts contribute to an understanding of wine production. They also display
continuity in form that bridges the turbulence of the Amarna Period. The earlier examples of these texts do not have
an ideological component. It is first with the Ramesside Period, and the more intrusive inclusion of the name of the
King, that some ideological intent can be identified.
Eva-Lena Wahlberg, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Box 626, SE-751 26
Uppsala, Sweden.
Keywords: wine, wine jar, label, shard, wine production, economy, workmens village, Ancient Egypt, Amarna,
Tutankhamuns tomb, Deir el-Medina, New Kingdom.
Cover image:
Wine jar from Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62)
drawn by Alicja Grenberger, Uppsala University
taken from Burtons photograph of wine jar
Carter No. 392, Griffith Institute, Ashmolean
Museum, Oxford.
Table of contents
Preface
iii
1 Introduction
1
3
1.1 Aim
2 Previous research
11
12
12
13
13
3.1 Amarna
3.2 Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62)
3.3 Deir el-Medina
3.4 The Language on the jar labels
15
19
24
24
30
36
37
41
42
42
48
58
63
ii
5 Summarizing discussion
5.1 The structure and content of the labels
5.2 Classification
5.3 Social structure, economic and social organization
5.4 Comparing the groups of primary sources
63
63
77
77
78
80
82
Catalogue
Concordance
87
165
Figures
Abbreviations
Bibliography
171
172
173
iii
Preface
The MA thesis on which this English version is based was first published and presented
at an internal seminar October 18, 2008. The present version, in English, edited and
with minor revisions is presented here. No major changes from the Swedish text have
been made, only a few minor errors have been corrected. Also, no new publications
after 2008 have been included.
Since I wrote this MA thesis I have published The mysterious beverage called
shedeh SdH
(Gttinger Mizsellen (2011), 230: 73-82), which is based on the
discussion in the original MA thesis.
Several colleagues have contributed with their help and support during the
development and writing of this MA thesis. Their help has provided me with a deeper
understanding of the materials from Amarna, Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62) and
Malqatta.
First I have to express my gratitude to my adviser Prof. Lana Troy who always
patiently supported me. Her infallible guidance throughout the work and generosity in
sharing her knowledge and experience has been invaluable to me.
I want to thank Uppsala University for a number of grants: Gernandt in 2002
and Wngstedt travel grants for 2003 and 2007.
The first trip in 2003 was to the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum in
Oxford to study Jaroslav erns notebooks that contained his transcripts of wine jar
labels from both Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62). I was also given access to
Henry Burtons photographs of the wine jars from Tutankhamuns tomb. On this trip, I
visited the Petrie Museum, University College, London to study the potshards that
Petrie published in Tell el-Amarna (1894).
The trip in 2007 went to USA and Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York,
where materials and potshards from the excavations at Malqatta are stored. In addition, I
also visited the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, to investigate the history of the wine jar
label. Finally, I had the opportunity to visit the Tutankhamun exhibition at the Franklin
Institute in Philadelphia which included objects of interest from the tomb.
I want to begin by thanking Jaromir Malek who let me come and visit Griffith
Institute, and helped me gain access, not only to their archives, but also to Bodleian and
Sackler Libraries. A sincere thanks to Elizabeth Fleming and Alison Hobby for their
kindness and guidance that made it possible for me to locate more material in the
archives than I initially been aware of. I also would like to thank Stephen Quirke at the
Petrie Museum for allowing me to study the potshards from the Petrie excavations at
iv
Amarna. The texts of these shards showed variations not evident in the Petries
publication.
Examination of the potshards at the Petrie Museum together with the access to
erns analysis have made it possible to compile and publish erns, previously
unknown, transcriptions.
I want to thank Catherine Roehrig at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for
allowing me to come and study the potshards, displayed in the museum, from
excavations at Malqatta. In addition, I thank Diana Patch and Susan Allen for all their
help during my work there.
My thoughts also go out to Cathleen Keller who sadly passed away in 2008. She
gave me permission to use the notes that she had compiled during her study of the
Malqatta potshards. These notes have given me invaluable information about the
material and I will always be grateful for her generosity.
I also thank Lawrence Berman at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston for his kind
reception and for information concerning an early wine jar from Giza, which at first
sight seemed to have text written on the vessels shoulder but, as it turned out, was
instead a pottery mark.
All these many acts of kindness throughout the work have been precious to me.
I also want to thank my dearest friends Anna Palmgren and sa Strandberg. I
often think to myself that I am privileged to have such friends. Anna, you have always
been there, through thick and thin, and I treasure our friendship dearly. sa, our
discussions about life in general and science in particular has been dear to me. Without
you two this journey would have been much less inspired.
And last but not least I thank my children Jimmy and Evelina, who have
patiently supported me since I started my academic studies in 1998. You have shared
the joys of my success and supported me in adversity. As a single mother, it has
sometimes been a struggle, but you have always been an endless source of inspiration.
Luv U, Mum!
Uppsala April 24, 2012
Eva-Lena Wahlberg
1 Introduction
Wine was an important element in ancient Egyptian society. Wine production was also a
common iconographic motif in the Theban tombs of the New Kingdom, where its
different stages are represented (Lerstrup 1992: 64-75, Poo 1995: 7-9, Murray 2000: 577578). Wine is also listed among temple offerings and is included in numerous offering
rituals (Poo 1995: 27-30, Murray 2000: 578). The festival scenes found in tombs also
incorporated wine (Poo 1995: 31) and wine jars are among the funerary offerings found
in the tombs of kings and members of the upper class (Poo 1995: 5-6). Wine could also
be an ingredient in medicine (Athenaeus I, 32c; Poo 1995: 30-31; Murray 2000: 581).
Wine production is depicted in private tombs (2686-2160 B.C.1, Giza and
Sakkara) as early as the Old Kingdom and later in Middle Kingdom private tombs (20551650 B.C. at Beni Hassan). During the 18th dynasty (1550-1295 B.C.) scenes of winemaking became a common motif in the tombs of Theban officials (Fig. 1). At the end of
the 18th dynasty and during the Ramesside Period this theme is less frequently found
(Lerstrup 1992: 61-65, Poo 1995: 7-11, Murray 2000: 578).
Wine was stored in large, specifically formed, ceramic vessels. During the New
Kingdom (1550-1069 B.C.), a text on the wine jars identified the content. These were
written in ink directly on the vessels most likely before they left the vineyard for further
transportation to different places throughout the country. The texts, partly standardized,
describe the content but can also have more detailed information related to the quality of
the wine, its origin and the year it was made. These small texts are called wine jar
labels in this study (Lesko 1978: 11, Poo 1995: 28, Murray 2000: 578-579). They have
been preserved on numerous shards from wine jars. These shards are relatively common
objects that comprise a distinct corpus. They are found at several sites and can be used
for a more place specific analysis of different aspects of wine production.
This study deals with three different groups of wine jar labels from well known
sites. Two are close contemporaries: the palace city of Amarna in Middle Egypt (13521336 B.C., 209 shards, cf. 3.1) and Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62) in the Valley of the
Kings (1336-1327 B.C., 26 shards, cf. 3.2). These two groups differ from each other, with
the wine jar labels from the palace city reflecting the presence of wine as a beverage for
festivals and everyday life and the wine jar labels, on intact jars, from Tutankhamuns
tomb showing the selection of wines for a royal funeral. The third and last group of wine
1
jar labels comes from the workmens village at Deir el-Medina (209 shards, cf. 3.3) and
has a wider and generally somewhat later, dating, with the much longer time span of
1479-1136 B.C. This material illustrates the unique position wine may have had in a
village environment, where it was an unusual element, perhaps with an emphasis on its
role as royal gift, ritual offering and a drink for special festivals.
Fig. 1. Wine production scenes from Intefs tomb (TT 155) (Sve-Sderbergh 1957: Pls XIV-XV).
1.1 Aim
The wine jar labels are an important source of information about how wine production
was administered. The details in the texts also contribute to our knowledge of this
important product and enable us to address several questions. It is important to establish
the standard forms used in the texts and thus to identify the different types of information
that were of interest for the administration of wine production and distribution. The
different classifications of wine are of interest and also the distribution of these categories
among the different sites. The label texts also provide information concerning ownership
of and responsibility for production. In addition there are hints with regards to a
controlled access to wine and it use. Wine was also an element of the economic and
social organization of ancient Egypt.
Additional issues include the question of when the texts were written on the jars,
before transportation from the vineyard or later on. The random or conscious selection of
wine jars as grave gifts is discussed in connection with the material from Tutankhamuns
tomb.
2 Previous research
Wine jar labels were identified as an individual category of finds in connection with
Petries publication of Tell el Amarna (1894), where the results from the excavation at
Amarna are described. Petrie does not provide information concerning the circumstance
of the finds, so where and in what archaeological contexts these shards were found is
unknown. Petrie collaborated with F Ll Griffith, who worked with the texts on the shards
(Petrie 1894: 32-34) and the information found there. Griffiths discussion covers all of
the published jar labels. He provides a historical context with reference to which king a
specific regnal year could refer and who the successor of Akhenaten could have been. He
gives the regnal years found on the shards in table form as well as describing the contents
of the jars as given in the text of the jar labels. He also includes a discussion of the other
names and places that are mentioned in the jar labels.
Amarna was further examined during the 1920s and 30s by J. D. S. Pendlebury,
who was the leader of Egypt Exploration Societys expeditions of 1926-1927 and 19311936. Many jar labels were found during these expeditions and a number of them came
from wine jars. The few notation of find circumstances show that the wine jar labels were
widely spread. In the central part of Amarna 335 shards with text were discovered and
209 of these came from wine jars. From excavation plans and other documentation it has
been possible to roughly locate 159 of the 209 wine jar labels (Pendlebury 1951: 216217, Pl. I, XVI, XIX, XVIII, XXI). This investigation shows that 46 wine jar labels came
from the area known as the Quarter of Military and Police, 27 wine jar labels were found
at the Records Office, 24 wine jar labels came from the Temple Magazines which were
located between the Great Temple and The Kings House, 14 wine jar labels were found
at the Central Hall at the Palace and eight wine jar labels were found on both sides of the
bridge over the Royal Road. The remaining 40 wine jar labels were spread over the
Central City with a few exceptions.
These labels were then studied by Fairman in collaboration with ern. They
were later published as a separate chapter in Pendleburys The City of Akhenaten Part III
The Central City and the Official Quarters (1951: 151-180, Pl. LXXXIV-XCVIII).
Fairman describes the textual information found in the wine jar labels, publishing the
label text transcribed into hieroglyphics. This form of publication reflected the larger goal
of the work, which was to organize the jar labels methodically and to discuss the different
hieratic handwritings from Amarna. The outbreak of the Second World War interrupted
the work which was also later downsized. Fairmans publication includes discussions of
i.e. toponyms, personal names and descriptions of content.
Leahy (1985: 65-109) has transcribed and translated the wine jar labels that were
found at the workmens village in Amarna (published in Kemp (ed.) Amarna reports II).
The shard material was partly found in rubbish heaps (Leahy 1985: 65). The texts are
presented both in hieratic and transcribed into hieroglyphics (Leahy 1985: 76-109). This
publication discusses the jar labels textual content, without any further analysis of the
texts and their find circumstances.
ern (1965) studied the wine jars and their labels from Tutankhamuns tomb.
These vessels were mainly found in the Annex of the tomb but three of them were found
in the Burial Chamber. One shard from a wine jar was found in the Corridor next to the
second door into the tomb and one wine jar was on the stairs below the first door to the
Corridor in the tomb. ern transcribed and partly translated the hieratic texts of the jar
labels, but he did not publish any transliterations. In all he worked with 38 vessels, 26 of
which were classified as wine jars. In his publication the wine jar labels are introduced
with a brief discussion. erns publication is also supplemented with the photographs
taken by Burton of Carters excavations at the Valley of the Kings. These are archived at
the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford and are currently online, together with
other documentation relating to KV 62.2
In his article Le shedeh: tude dun procd de vinification en gypte ancienne,
Tallet (1995) studies the beverage shedeh (SdH). The materials that Tallet works with are
the seals and jar labels from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb, as well as those from
Saqqara and Medinet Habu. The author questions the common belief that shedeh was
made of pomegranates, stating that this interpretation is based on a misconception by
earlier researchers. Tallet (1995: 482-485, figs 1 and 6) argues that shedeh was probably
specially prepared, possibly by cooking, referring to texts and a couple of depictions from
Beni Hassan. He does not however understand the entire process. The images show how
one person stirs a pot while others filter the liquid into another vessel. This reading of the
image is supported by the text to which Tallet (1995: 482) refers.
Koenig (1980, Catalogue des tiquettes de jarres hiratiques de Deir el-Mdineh
II) published the wine jar labels which were found in what supposedly were rubbish
heaps in Deir el-Medina, the Workmens Village in the nearby Valley of the Kings.
These are are presented in hieroglyphic transcription, supported with some reference to
the original hieratic. Unfortunately, no other information is given regarding the text of the
jar labels. Only the ceramic ware, the shards measurements and color are given. This is a
complicating factor when interpreting the material.
2
http://www.griffith.ox.ac.uk/tutankhamundiscovery.html
Tallet (1993) examined the jar labels, originally published by Koenig (1980), in
an article published in Deir el-Mdineh et la Valle des Rois. The author treats all the
labels for vessels containing, not only wine, but other products as well, such as fowl and
various oils. According to Tallet (1993: 268) wine was not included in the regular rations
for the villagers, but was instead distributed at special occasions, such as the Great Opet
Festival.
In 1951 Hayes published a series of four articles dealing with labels and seals, for
a variety of products, including wine, from the palace area of Malqata, which is situated
to the south of the royal funerary temples in the nearby Valley of the Kings. In the first
article Hayes (1951: 35-40, fig. 1-16) deals with 1400 jar labels, organising them in
different groups of products. This is followed by 260 typical examples of the texts from
these labels. These include finds from a workmens village from Malqata. In the second
article he presents an attempt to treat the jar labels methodically, analyzing the text
information using different headings: a) the date, b) the name of the commodity, c) an
adjective indicating quality/type, d) quantity, e) occasion, f) source, g) the name and title
of the donor, h) the name and title of the official who authorized the content of the jar.
Furthermore, the wine jars form is described and discussions of royal names, the
domains of the temples as well as ownership, donations, personal names (including those
of Asiatic origin) are included. Lists with titles and names of the producers are also given
(Hayes 1951: 82-104, figs 17-23).
In the third article the seals are treated and arranged with regard to vessels,
documents and brick stamps (Hayes 1951: 156-183, figs 24-33). In the fourth and final
article, the remaining objects with text are treated. These include faence finger rings,
scarabs, amulets, inscribed faence vases, offering tables and other small objects, as well
as monumental inscriptions together with miscellaneous inscriptions. In the first three
articles the sources include wine jar labels while in the fourth article these are not
considered (Hayes 1951: 231-242, figs 34-39).
An attempt to create a model with which to analyse the jar labels is presented in
the article Les tiquettes de Jarre Vin du Nouvel Empire (Tallet 1998a). Tallet
(1998a: 1127-1129) suggests organizing the information in the label text in table form
with headings such as provenance, date, product, domain, source of the product, location
and the responsible authority. This structure is intended to make comparison possible so
that similarities, such as names of persons or locations can be identified. Problems of
interpretation are also discussed by the author. For example, several individuals can have
the same name. Tallet believes that there is still a lot of information to be found in these
small texts (Tallet 1998a: 1133).
In Commodity Prices from the Ramesside Period (Janssen 1975), jar labels are
used to discuss the economic value of wine, working with the wine jar labels found in
rubbish heaps in the south part of the Workmans Village at Deir el-Medina (Janssen
1975: 7) as well as other texts. Papyrus Turin 1907/8, II, 4, for example, mentions that a
mnt-vessel of wine cost 2 deben (Janssen 1966: 83). Janssen (1975: 351) compares this
text with another where wine is said to cost 5 deben. This reading is however uncertain
because the text is damaged. The author presents the hypothesis that wine was mostly
consumed by the upper class and that wine probably did not appeal to the inhabitants of
Deir el-Medina, because the vineyards were located in the Delta and the Western Oasis
and were too far away from the village (Janssen 1975: 350-352).
In the article Quelques aspects de lconomie du vin en gypte ancienne, au
Nouvel Empire (Tallet 1998b) wine is described from the perspective of economics. The
article contains a short description of wine production, the vineyards geographic
location, the administration and the hierarchy among the officials. He says that wine was
included in a distribution of products that were sent throughout the Nile Valley from the
source of production in the Delta in the north to the south of Egypt where the shards were
found (Tallet 1998b: 247-248). He also refers to a picture of a boat loaded with wine jars
(Tallet 1998b: fig. 4). Tallet (1998b: 259) says that wine was given as a gift to the
Workmans Village at Deir el-Medina on special occasions.
Several researchers have referred to the wine jar labels as a source of information
in a larger context. In The making of wine in Egypt published in Gttingen Miszellen
by Lerstrup (1992), wine jar labels are studied from the perspective of production. Texts
from papyri, wine jar labels and tomb scenes are used to describe the production of wine
in ancient Egypt.
In Divine Households, Administrative and Economic Aspects of the New Kingdom
Royal Memorial Temples in Western Thebes, Haring (1997: 346-362) discusses the
textual information of the jar labels and the seals. In this publication the most frequent
phrases are sorted into groups and those kings that are referred to are presented in detail.
In addition, a brief discussion of the role of the temples in this chain of production is
presented. The author uses many unpublished wine jar labels from erns notebooks in
his discussion.
Other authors have dealt with this material from a broader perspective. In Helcks
Materialien zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte des Neuen Reiches the jar labels have been used as
a source for the names of specific kings (Helck 1961: 202-203). The publication also
treats offering lists (cf. Urk IV:755, 3 and 1255, 16) and the donation record in Papyrus
Harris I (17a, 2-17a, 6) as well as other sources (Helck 1963: 349-367). In these lists, it is
seen that wine is a common gift from the king to the many temples (e.g. Karnak and
Abydos) around Egypt. In contrast, there are only a few reports of private donations of
wine to the temples (Helck 1963, Vol III: 460-463).
A catalogue of the names and titles of officials during Amarna period is found in
the series gyptiaca Helvetica (Hari 1976). This publication includes the primary
sources from Tell el Amarna (Petrie 1894) and The City of Akhenaten III (Pendlebury
1951) and treats the wine jar labels as documents for individual officials connected to
Amarna. These officials would have been at the vineyards in the Delta and not in the city
of Amarna.
In Egyptian Amphorae, of the New Kingdom and Ramesside Periods (Wood
1987) the wine jars different shapes and origin are discussed. According to Wood, the
shape of these vessels originated in a need for durability. A flat-bottom vessel has a
tendency to crack and therefore breaks more easily than a pointed bottom vessel that
tolerates a rougher handling during transportation. These vessels were mainly
transported by ship. The author uses the vessels shape as the basis for a typology. They
are believed to have been made in Egypt but influenced by Syro-Palestinian vessels from
the Eastern Delta during the Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period (20551550 B.C., Wood 1987: 76-79).
To sum up, earlier researchers have mainly published primary sources with a
close connection to archaeological sites and related objects. There are attempts to
systematize the information from the jar labels. This information has been used in
research, on e.g. wine production, wine as a beverage and the local economy.
10
11
12
3.1 Amarna
The wine jar labels from the city of Amarna come from excavations inside and around
the palace and the temple areas (Petrie 1894, Pendlebury 1951). The jar labels from the
later expeditions have been discussed and transcribed by Fairman and ern (Pendlebury
1951: 151-180, Pl. LXXXIV-XCVIII). There is some uncertainty about the way the work
was divided between the two researchers. The work of the two clearly overlaps and it is
difficult to distinguish which one was responsible for the individual readings. This is
problematic because their translations can differ. When a label was published it could be
with one transcription by Fairman but exist in erns notebooks (17.54-56) with
another. The lack of facsimiles of the hieratic texts makes it difficult to make an
independent assessment.
The wine jar labels from Petries excavations are not included in the publication
by Pendlebury and no one, other than Griffith, worked with and analysed those labels.
However, in erns notebook4 17.54 a transcription of these jar labels, dated to July
1939, are found. Fairman briefly mentions the notebooks existence in the introduction to
The City of Akhenaten Part III (Fairman 1951: 151), in connection with his publication of
the wine jar labels. The information concerning these wine jar labels found in this study
is based on erns notebook 17.54. A visit to the Petrie Museum, University College,
London, showed that some of the wine jar labels had faded, making it very difficult to see
what has been written on them. ern had only commented on the condition of the
inscriptions occasionally with the words traces and / or pale. erns transcription,
together with Petries original publication of the hieratic text, have together preserved the
information that, on some of the shards, is now lost.
erns notebooks are archived at the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.
13
57). The analysis in this study is based on erns notebook, MSS 17.47, as well as
Burtons photos at the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum in Oxford. Although there
are only 26 wine jar labels from the royal tomb, the fact that almost all of them are
unbroken increases their value as a source of information.
14
15
16
The standardizing of the text is obvious in the material from Amarna and
Tutankhamuns tomb. These texts tend to be concise. One example of a typical text on a
label from Amarna.
Am 55 (P5, Petrie 1894: Pl. XXII)
Date
HAt sp 10
Year 10
Classification +
irp n
Wine of
Institution
pr sHtp-ra
Responsible official
HAt sp 5
Year 5
Classification +
irp nDm n
Sweet wine of
Institution
pr itn n qArt
Responsible official
When the text is extended, information about the institution and place of production is
expanded, as in the examples below.
Am 125 (F97 + ) (Fairman and ern 1951: Pl. LXXXVIII)
Date
HAt sp 10
Year 10
Classification +
irp n
Wine of
Institution
pr anx-itn a-w- s
Location
n itr imnt
Responsible official
HAt sp 9
Year 9
Classification +
irp n
Wine of
Institution
pr itn
Location
n itr imnty
Responsible official
The abbreviations refer to the catalogue: Am (Amarna), Tut (Tutankhamuns tomb, KV 62) and DeM
(Deir el-Medina).
17
Most of the wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina only contain fragmentary texts preserved
on them. Yet, it is still possible to see that the same structure in the texts has been used in
this material as in that from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb.
HAt sp 36
Year 36
Classification +
irp n
Wine of
Institution
pr imn-[htp] []
Location
itr imntt
Responsible official
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
The texts in the material from Deir el-Medina have in some cases been expanded to
include more information about the geographical location of the vineyard, the hierarchy
within the institution and the different levels of the officials.
HAt sp 4
Year 4
Classification
irp n hrw 3
Wine of day 3
Institution
n pA kAmw n pr
ra-ms-w-[]
Ramses-[]
Location
Added information
mHty m Hr Snwt
Responsible official
[]
[]
Classification
[i]rp n hrw 5
[W]ine of day 5
Institution
n pA kAmw n tA Hwt nt HH
rnpt
of Years
Added information
n []-[stp]-n-ra a- w-s
of []-[Setep]enre, LPH
Added information
Location
m pr imn
nty m pA itr n
wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra []
Responsible official
[]
[]
18
HAt sp 6
Year 6
Classification
irp
n pA kAmw n ra-ms-swmr-imn a- w- s mr wAst
r-xt imy-r pr Hri
Wine
of the vineyard of Ramses-Meramun,
LPH, whom Thebes loves
under the authority of the Overseer of the
Estate Hori
of the Temple of Millions of Years of the
King of UL Egypt Usermaatre-Setepenre
kAmw + Institution
Responsible official
Added information
There are a few jar labels where the text departs from the standard form. Some of them
have been identified as wine jar labels without mentioning irp or SdH in the text. One
presumed example of donated wine comes from Tutankhamuns tomb and only has a title
and a name.
Tut 26 (26, ern 1965: 24)
Donor (?)
TAty pntw
Another label from Deir el-Medina could identify a product from a garden.
DeM 52 (6340, Koenig 1980: Pl. 41)
Date
HAt sp 5
Year 5
at nt xt
of the orchard
Donor (?)
ipw sA Axy
Labels where the date has been placed after the description of the wine are rare and
perhaps reflect a provincial tradition like that cited in Am 40, which refers to the
Southern Oasis, perhaps El-Khargah (Giddy 1987: 39, 77-80, 97, 164).
Am 40 (P94, Petrie 1894: Pl. XXV)
Classification
Institution
pr itn
Hr whAt rsyt
Date
HAt sp 12
Year 12
[]
[]
19
The wine jar labels made it possible for the scribes to record outgoing and incoming wine
and to control the supply. As historical documents these labels give an insight into which
information the Egyptians considered important in relation to the quality of the wine and
the production chain.
4.1 Dating
A notation of the year frequently begins the text of the wine jar labels. The phrase HAt sp
regnal year (Hayes 1951: 82, Haring 1997: 346, Faulkner 1962: 162, Gardiner 1957:
580) or simply year (Fairman 1951: 159, ern 1965: 1-3, Kemp 1985: 65-74) is found
before the numbers. Since the kings name is seldom found with the HAt sp dating on the
labels, no connection between the (regnal) year and specific kings can be made (Fairman
1951: 163, Haring 1997: 346). Some attempts however have been made to relate the HAt
sp dates to specific kings in order to organize the labels chronologically (Griffith 1894:
32, Fairman 1951: 159, Hayes 1951: 38, fig. 16).
There are a few cases where the HAt sp dating is placed after another initial
heading. Two wine jar labels from Amarna (Am 50, 163) describe the wine as a tithe
offering to Aton (mD pA itn, see below 4.2.5). This information is placed before the HAt sp
dating to Years 9 and 12. The text in DeM 194 begins with the phrase inyt kA-sA (gift [of /
to] Kasa) followed by HAt sp 2. The word inyt is possibly a Late Egyptian writing of inw
(product, gift or tribute, Faulkner 1962: 22). It is unusual to find a dating that included
more than a year. There are, however, a few exceptions in this material. From Amarna
there is a wine jar label with HAt sp 1 Abd 1 (Year 1, month 1) but without the season (Am
139, Fairman 1951: 163). This dating could possibly refer to a succession to the throne,
such as that of Smenkhkare or Tutankhaton.
In the material from Deir el-Medina there are two wine jar labels where both
month and season are included. On DeM 34, HAt sp 8 Abd 1 Axt (Year 8, 1st month of
Akhet) and on DeM 69, [HAt] sp 5 Abd 4 Axt ([Year] 5, 4th month of Akhet) is found. Both
of the texts are otherwise very short, DeM 34 refers to Meidum as the source of the wine
and DeM 69 refers to the Estate of Amun on the Western River.
Amarna HAt sp dates
Year
Quantity
Label References
HAt sp 1
(7)
HAt sp 2
(4)
HAt sp 3
20
HAt sp 4
(4)
HAt sp 5
(3)
Am 67, 88, 89
HAt sp 6
(7)
HAt sp 7
(5)
HAt sp 8
(4)
HAt sp 9
(8)
HAt sp 10
(8)
HAt sp 11
(3)
HAt sp 12
(7)
HAt sp 13
(6)
HAt sp 14
(9)
HAt sp 15
(2)
Am 4, 189
HAt sp 16
(7)
HAt sp 17
(8)
HAt sp 28
(1)
Am 196
There are 93 labels in the material from Amarna (approximately 44.5 %), where the HAt
sp dating has been preserved with a number. Furthermore there are two labels with
fragmentary dates (Am 150, 154). Quite a number of the labels which do not have any
preserved dating are damaged so that the beginning of the first line is unreadable. It is
reasonable to assume that most of the texts originally included a HAt sp dating.
The dated material from Amarna is said to come mainly from the reign of
Akhenaten (Griffith 1894: 32, Fairman 1951: 159). Since the building of the city began
in Year 5 of his reign (Shaw 2000: 277), the labels with a date lower than 4 are probably
from one of the later kings, Smenkhkare or Tutankhaton (cf. Griffith 1894: 32, Fairman
1951: 157-159, ern 1964: 38) both of whom had a residence in the city before it was
abandoned. It remains unclear whether Smenkhkares two years as king was in coregency with Akhenaten and thus coincided with Akhenatens last years (16-17) (cf.
Pendlebury 1935: 33, Quirke & Spencer 1997: 81-82, Reeves 2000: 22-23).
Among the labels with a HAt sp dating to Years 1-4 there were some with a little
more expressive content. Two labels with HAt sp 1 refer to the Estate of Smenkhkare (pr
smnx-kA-ra; Am 63) and include his prenomen Ankhkheperure (anx-xprw-ra; Am 64) and
thus should be dated to his reign. Another label has the dating Year 1, month 1 (Am 139)
which probably refers to the accession of Smenkhkare or Tutankhaton.
The labels which are included in this investigation are spread out evenly among
Years 1-17. Only Year 3 is not represented. A dating to Year 28 (Am 196), in a very
21
fragmentary label text, which only contains the word wine, stands out as impossible to
place chronologically.
Tomb of Tutankhamun (KV 62) HAt sp dates
Year
Quantity
Label References
HAt sp 4
(5)
Tut 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
HAt sp 5
(12)
HAt sp 9
(6)
HAt sp 10
(1)
Tut 24
HAt sp 31
(1)
Tut 25
Of 26 wine jar labels from KV 62, there are 25 that begin with a date. Years 4, 5 and 9
from Tutankhamuns reign are represented. Two additional labels have a dating to Years
10 (Tut 24) and 31 (Tut 25). These two labels differ in terms of variety and dating. The
label with Year 10 is for a good wine from iAty, which, according to ern (1965: 3) is an
unknown locality but the seal on this vessels mud-stopper reads Fruit of the Southern
Oasis. This date could represent a wine from the reign of Akhenaten. The label with
Year 31 as a date is severely damaged and the phrase itr imnt (Western River) has been
reconstructed. It probably derives from the reign of Amenhotep III considering that he
reigned during 38 years.
Deir el-Medina HAt sp dates
Year
HAt sp 1
(1)
DeM 1
HAt sp 2
(6)
HAt sp 3
(7)
HAt sp 4
(3)
HAt sp 5
(4)
22
HAt sp 6
(5)
HAt sp 7
(3)
HAt sp 8
(4)
HAt sp 9
(1)
DeM 164
HAt sp 10
(2)
DeM 33, 96
HAt sp 11
(2)
DeM 2, 183
HAt sp 12
(2)
DeM 91, 99
HAt sp 13
(2)
DeM 158
DeM 6 Djeserkheperure Setepenre (Horemheb)
HAt sp 14
(5)
HAt sp 17
(2)
DeM 53
DeM 12 Usermaatre Setepenre (Ramses II)
HAt sp 19
(2)
HAt sp 21
(1)
DeM 159
HAt sp 22
(1)
DeM 72
HAt sp 23
(2)
HAt sp 24
(1)
DeM 16
HAt sp 26
(1)
DeM 9
HAt sp 27
(1)
DeM 92
HAt sp 28
(1)
DeM 42
HAt sp 29
(2)
DeM 77, 97
HAt sp 31
(1)
HAt sp 32
(2)
HAt sp 34
(2)
DeM 156
DeM 163 Usermaatre Setepenre (Ramses II)
HAt sp 36
(1)
DeM 65
HAt sp 37
(3)
HAt sp 39
(1)
DeM 144
HAt sp 40
(1)
DeM 79
23
HAt sp 41
(1)
DeM 78
HAt sp 42
(1)
DeM 26
HAt sp 46
(1)
DeM 160
HAt sp 53
(2)
DeM 36
DeM 46 Ramses Meramun (Ramses II)
HAt sp 55
(2)
DeM 94
DeM 120 Ramses Meramun (Ramses II)
HAt sp 65
(1)
DeM 146
The year dates from the Deir el-Medina material is considerably more complicated than
those from Amarna and KV 62. The names of several institutions also include that of a
king. The occurrence of a royal name gives a post quem (earliest) dating for the labels.
Years over 40 should be assigned to Ramses II who reigned for 66 years (Shaw 2000:
481). The name of the king Menkheperure (Thutmosis III) does not imply that the text on
the jar labels is contemporary with this king. His temple cult was still active in Ramesside
time and appears in the so-called Turin Strike Papyrus from the reign of Ramses III
(Gardiner 1948a: 49, vs 3, 1; cf. e.g. Frandsen 1990: 173). The temple cult of Ramses II
was also long-lived (Schmidt 1973: 70-71) and labels where his name occurs could be
dated after his reign.
An additional dating problem is the combination of Year 34 with the name of
Horemheb on a wine jar label from Deir el-Medina (DeM 57, Koenig 1980: Pl 42, no.
6345). Unfortunately, the hieratic text has not been published. Horemheb is commonly
believed to have reigned for 27-28 years (cf. Shaw 2000: 481 for the dates 1323-1295
B.C.). New research has now questioned this dating, reducing the length of Horemhebs
reign to perhaps only 14-15 years (Van Dijk 2008: 263). This makes the date of the jar
label even more puzzling. In addition, the date Year 34 has been heavily reconstructed.
The area where the date is found only shows one hobble (V20, number 10) and four
strokes (Z1, number 4), Koenig added two signs for ten, with a striated overlay in the
transcription, thus reading 34. Without support for these added signs or the hieratic text to
check, this wine jar label has been corrected to read Year 14.
24
4.2 Classification
Wine is described using different attributes. First of all it is described as a type. Two
types of wine, irp and SdH occur in this material. Classification of quality is also shown,
which graded the wine. The presence of n hrw n X (wine) of day X, indicates which
day in the production process of the wine that was of interest when identifying separate
vessels. Other phrases occur which perhaps characterize the function of the wine.
4.2.1 Type
The texts distinguish between two types of wine, irp
and SdH
. One jar
Quantity
% of the material
Amarna (209)
132
63,1 %
KV 62 (26)
22
84,6 %
127
60,8 %
The most frequently used term for wine is irp (Wb I, 115: 5-8; cf. Faulkner 1962: 28) said
to have the generic meaning wine.
The word irp does not have any distinct etymological origin. Poo (1995: 21, n.
156) suggests a connection to the word rp (to rot)
or
(Wb II, 414:10-11, cf.
Faulkner 1962: 148) and there is one example of this word written
(Wb I, 115:10).
Poo refers to the grapes being tramped into a rotting mass and therefore irp was the drink
that is made from rotten grapes (Poo 1995: 21, n. 156).
The irp-wines are mainly discussed in terms of whether both red and white wines
existed at this time. The texts do not mention the colour of wine, but blue grapes have
been depicted in tomb scenes and the liquid which pours out of the vats is colored redbrown (Davies 1917: Pl XXVI; Lesko 1977: 17, 1995: 219; James 1995: 205; Murray
2000: 591). Lesko (1977:19) however, notes that Wine color could have varied
considerably even if all these early wines were technically red.
The first definite textual evidence for white wine is dated to the second and third
century A.D., when a Mareotic white wine from the northwest Delta was mentioned as
25
easy to drink and pleasant (Lesko 1977: 14, Murray 2000: 591, quoting Athenaeus I,
33d). Athenaeus (170-230 A.D.), a native of Naucratis, also describes a white Taeniotic
wine from the strip of land southwest of Alexandria, as having a pleasant and aromatic
taste even better than the Mareotic wines. This confirms that there was a great diversity
of taste and color in Egyptian wine.
Chemical analyses using the LC/MS/MS method performed at the University of
Barcelona have been used to investigate whether white wine occurred in Egypt earlier
than the second century A.D. (Guasch-Jan et al 2004: 1672, 2006b: 1077-1078).
Samples from six wine jars from Tutankhamuns tomb were examined. Before the
samples were analysed, the samples colour was evaluated, revealing that the samples
from four vessels (Tut 2 irp, 7 irp, 10 irp nDm and 26, no classification) were yellowish
while that from one vessel (Tut 14 irp) was pale brown and that from another (Tut 22 irp)
was dark-black in its appearance. Of the two acids that were isolated, the presence of the
first would show if that the sample originated from grapes (tartaric acid) and the second if
the wine had been red (syringic acid). The lack of syringic acid, as a marker for red wine,
and the presence of tartaric acid would be evidence for the vessel having once contained
white wine.
These analyses indicated that five of the vessels contained white wine (Tut 2, 7,
10, 14, 26) and only one of the vessels contained red wine (Tut 22). These results verified
the earlier evaluation of the color of the samples, as only the sample of red wine had been
described as dark-black, with the others being described as yellowish-pale brown. Among
the wine jar labels there was one that described the wine as sweet (nDm, Tut 10). Thus
confirming a production of both red and white wine, all designated as irp, as early as the
end of 18th dynasty (Guasch-Jan et al 2006b: 1077-1079).
The label texts also reveal that four (Tut 2, 7, 10, 14) of the white wines
originated from itr imnt (the Western River) in the Delta, with the sweet wine (Tut 10)
among them.
SdH
Origin
Quantity
Label references
Amarna (209)
3,3 %
KV 62 (26)
11,5 %
Tut 3, 5, 13
According to its occurrence among the wine jar labels SdH-wine was not common, with
the irp-type clearly dominating. It is interesting that SdH-wine is lacking among the labels
26
from Deir el-Medina, even though the number of labels corresponds with Amarna. In the
material from the Workmans Village at Amarna there was only one label for a SdH-wine
(Leahy 1985: 100, fig. 6.13, no. 97). The rare occurrence of the SdH-type could indicate
that this wine was more exclusive and therefore less accessible in a working class
environment or it could be the result of the random survival of the labels.
SdH-wine is mentioned in different contexts, such as in literary, medical, didactic
and legal texts, love songs, offering lists and ritual texts as well as on wine jar labels (e.g.
Am 32, 34, 205 and Tut 3, 5, 13). For a long time it has been uncertain which fruit SdHwine was made of (cf. Guasch-Jan, et al 2006a: 98). In early research the SdH was
classified as a wine made of pomegranate (Loret 1892: 76-78; Gardiner 1947: 235;
Fairman 1951: 164; Leahy 1985: 66, 72; Lesko 1977, 1995). This conclusion has been
questioned and judged as lacking support (Tallet 1995: 460). Alternative suggestions to
the earlier identification as a pomegranate wine have been presented. Dates, figs, wine
must and even second-rate wine, perhaps vinegar, has been proposed (Tallet 1995: 459460). The last two suggestions seem forced, given that SdH-wine is often classified nfr nfr
(very good, e.g. Am 32, 34, 205 and Tut 3, 5, 13). It was not until Ptolemaic time that
different authors (e.g. Plutarch, Pliny the Elder, Oribasius, Dioscorides and Palladius)
became more eloquent and discussed different fruits for wine-making, among these were
pomegranate (Tallet 1995: 462). In these texts, fruit wines made from e.g. apples, pears,
carobs and different berries are listed as false wines. These wines were also considered
to have medicinal qualities. Pomegranate for example has an astringent quality, promoted
digestion, counteracted internal inflammation and fever (Tallet 1995: 462-463). Tallet
(1995: 463) suggests that the fact that SdH was a fine wine is of less importance than
perhaps its medicinal qualities and that this aspect deserves more research.
The question of which fruit SdH-wine was made has been answered by the same
research that identified white wine in Tutankhamuns wine jars (Guasch-Jan et al 2006a:
100-101). One sample from a vessel containing SdH-wine (Tut 13) from Tutankhamuns
tomb was chemically analysed using the LC/MS/MS method (Guasch-Jan et al 2004:
1672). The results showed that there were traces of tartaric acid, which proved that the
wine was made of grapes. There were also traces of syringic acid, which identified the
wine as red. Therefore the analysis has shown definitively that the vessel with the SdHlabel had contained red wine. The question remains, however, whether the wine had been
prepared in some way, for example by boiling or if it had been refined with some other
method (Tallet 1995: 482-485, Murray 2000: 593).
27
A couple of texts give indications that the process that produced SdH-wine
involved heating. For example, Papyrus Salt 825 (BM 10090, cf. Derchain 1965), a ritual
text from Late Period (715-332 B.C.), describes the production of SdH-wine.
wHm atx
Repeat filtration
an xt
Increase heating
xpr SdH pw
di.n ra r sA=f
(Papyrus Salt 825, II, 1. Derchain 1965: Pl. I, cf. Guasch-Jan et al 2006a: 99)
It is possible that the classification of wine as SdH-wine was based on the way it was
produced. A measure of exclusiveness may be deduced from the limited occurrence of
SdH. The taste of the wine is described in a love song from Papyrus Harris 500 (group B,
stanza 4, 5,1-5,3) that speaks of SdH-wine as sweet (SdH pA nDm m r(A)=i The shedehwine, the sweetness is in my mouth, cf. Fox 1985: 21 with n. b; Mathieu 1996: 62)
which would have made it a desirable commodity.
There are some indications that the characteristic taste of SdH-wine came from an
ingredient in the crushed grapes. Added flavouring has been refuted by the sample from
the wine jar labeled with SdH from Tutankhamuns tomb (Tut 13). The wine that this jar
had once contained lacked any trace of another substance, such as honey (Guasch-Jan et
al 2006a: 100). This shows that the special characteristic of the wine is from some kind of
treatment of the grapes.
One scene from Beni Hassan (fig. 2) illustrates a two-step process, showing how
the wine must is pressed out of the remains of the grapes and next to this is another scene
that shows cooking and filtration. Another wine-making scene displays a zig-zag line
under a vessel, which may be an indication that it was heated (fig. 3, Tallet 1995: 482485).
Furthermore the quote above from Papyrus Salt 825 (BM 10090, Derchain 1965:
Pl. I, cf. Guasch-Jan et al 2006a: 99) provides evidence that heating and filtration were
involved in the preparation of the wine.
28
Fig, 2. Section of a wine-making scene from the tomb of Bakt III, Beni Hassan, 11th dynasty (Newberry
1893: Pl. VI, Tallet 1995: 482-485, cf. Murray 2000:593).
Fig. 3. Scene of possibly crushed grapes being heated and filtrated from tomb 15 in Beni Hassan (J. F.
Champollion, Les monuments de lEgypte et de la Nubie IV, Paris, 1845, Pl 389/4; jfr Tallet 1995:459492).
29
Fig. 4. Scene of pressing out the wine from tomb 15 in Beni Hassan (J. F. Champollion, Les monuments de
lEgypte et de la Nubie IV, Paris, 1845, Pl 389/3; jfr Tallet 1995:459-492).
The process of boiling down and filtrating crushed grapes in order to make syrup would
have been both slow and demanding. This could partly explain the infrequent occurrence
of SdH-wines in ancient Egyptian donation lists. One text describes a donation consisting
of 1,500 vessels with irp-wine and 50 vessels with SdH-wine (Poo 1995: 14-15). The
process of boiling and filtration would have produced only a small amount of syrup.
Some level of exclusivity, suggested by the low number of donated SdH-wine and the
supposed difficulties of the production process, is indicated for SdH-wine.
One product that is produced in Italy of today uses crushed grapes, mosto cotto,
which have been boiled into syrup. Furthermore, there is another, later, method, governo
alla Toscano, which uses grape syrup to reinforce the taste and is characteristic for
Chianti wines. This is done by adding a concentration of grapes to make the wine sweeter
(oral communication Kjrling 2008-09-156).
I want to express my gratitude to the sommelier Andreas Kjrling who has assisted with references to the
different products and who has also provided information about the chemical processes involved in winemaking.
30
The conclusion that can be drawn is that the sweet SdH-wine was produced by
preparing crushed grapes that were then blended into an already fermented wine to give it
a sweeter taste and higher percentage of alcohol.
iArrt
The wine jar label that refers to iArrt (Am 207) was an uncertain addition to this study and
the types of wine. Fairman, who worked with the Amarna material, did not include this
product name among wines. He instead saw it as a fruit, probably raisins / grapes
(Fairman 1951: 166, 176, Pl. XCVI, no. 304). The hesitation depends on the lack of the
hieroglyph with the bound vines on a rack
(Gardiner Sign List M43) in the writing.
This sign is otherwise generally used as a classifier for words related to wine (Wb I:32,
cf. Lesko 1977:15). The writing of iArrt on wine jar label Am 207
has the
grain of sand (Gardiner Sign List N33) as a determinative. This sign ordinarily classifies
words as fruit.
There are several arguments understanding iArrt as a reference to wine in this
case. Grapes and raisins were not ordinarily stored in ceramic vessels. It has been noted
that in tomb depictions fruit was stored in ventilated containers, such baskets or simply
placed on tables (Hepper 1990: 67). The grapes found in Tutankhamuns tomb were
stored in baskets, one of which was a vessel-shaped (Hepper 1990: 67, Reeves 2000:
206).
The jar label with iArrt in its text is dated to Year 14 and ends with the title Hry
baH, that title for Vineyard Supervisor that replaced Hry kAmw after Akhenatens Year 13
(Helck 1963, Vol. IV: 728, ern 1964: 38). Year dates do not occur on vessels
containing fruit but there are dates for other products such as honey, preserved
meat/fish/fowl, different oils, fat and so on. The combination of the inclusion of a
reference to a Vineyard Supervisor and the presence of a date indicated that the jar
contained wine. However, the specific meaning of this term in this context is however
unknown.
31
read on the seals from Old Kingdom (cf. e.g. Kaplony 1963: 1121, no. 213; 1135, nos
3097, 310, 311; 1136, nos 312, 316, 317, 318; 1185, nos 747, 748; 1187, nos 7658 and erRaziq 1979: 242). It is uncertain if any seals or wine jar labels have been found from
Middle Kingdom. When classification appears in the New Kingdom it is already fully
developed.
Distribution of quality classification
Amarna
KV 62
Deir el-Medina
1 (Tut 24)
irp-wines
irp nfr (15)
188)
irp nfr nfr (15)
201, 206)
irp nDm (9)
4 (Tut 1, 8, 10,
12)
[irp] nfr nDm
1 ( Am 203)
1 (Am 202)
1 (DeM 72)
3 (Tut 3,5,13)
Sum
22 / 10.5 %
8 / 30.8 %
18 / 8.6 %
(1)
irp HAyt nfr (2)
sdH-wines
irp
Four different classifications have been documented for irp-wine in this material: nfr
(good), nfr nfr (very good), nDm (sweet) and also hAyt nfr (merry-making?). Furthermore,
there is one wine that is classified as nfr nDm (good, sweet) that is probably an irp-wine.
This suggests that there could have been differences between the sweet wines as well.
The use of nfr and nfr nfr as a term of classification also occurs with other
products, such as eye make-up. In a letter from the time of Ramses IX a royal decree
According to er-Raziq seal 308 came from a wine jar, but it turned out to be seal 309 (quoted above) that
was meant.
8
In er-Raziqs catalogue he has missed that the combination of signs consists of
and not only a
plain rack for grapes.
32
reads: Arrange that galena of very good quality (msdmt nfr nfr) is brought for the
Pharaohs (LPH) eye make-up (Helck 1967: 147, letter B, lines 24-25).
One interesting question in relation to classification is if it is possible to see if the
better wine has a distinctive source of production or ownership. In Amarna, the good
irp-wine (irp nfr) came from Nebmaatres domain (tA Hwt nb-mAat-ra, Am 48), the
Domain of the Aton (tA Hwt pA itn, Am 79) and the Estate of the Living Aton (pr anx-itn,
Am 129). Additionally one irp nfr came from an estate associated with the kings
daughter Baket[aton] (pr sAt nsw bAk-[], Am 70). One example of an irp nfr belonged
to pr itn n wHAt rsyt, the Estate of Aton of the Southern Oasis (Am 99). The final example
of an irp nfr is from a fragmentary text that only has the word pr and then the Western
[River] ([itr] imnt; Am 188).
Of the very good irp-wines (irp nfr nfr) from Amarna, six of eight were in some
way connected to an institute of Aton. One Estate of Aton (pr itn) is mentioned three
times (Am 28, 40, 98) but one of the labels also has the additional information Hr wHAt
rsyt (at the Southern Oasis, Am 40). On another jar label the Estate of Aton (pr itn) is
followed by an n of followed by a lacuna (Am 98). The Estate of the Living Aton at
the Western River (pr anx itn n itr imnt; Am 121), The Domain of the Aton (tA Hwt pA
itn; Am 201) and the Estate of Atons Gleaming (pr itn tH; Am 206) also occur. In one
case (Am 3) the very good wine is connected to the high priest of Aton (wr mAw) Meryre.
One jar label marked with irp nfr nfr lacks other information (Am 1).
Only one jar from Tutankhamuns tomb is marked with irp nfr (Tut 24), where
the wine is described as good wine of iAty (irp nfr n iAty) with the toponym iAty as a
possible reference to a vineyard in the oasis (ern 1965:3 and cf. below). There are no
wine jars with the notation irp nfr nfr (very good wine) from this tomb.
The seven wine jar labels with the inscription irp nfr from Deir el-Medina show
the same variation of sources as those from Amarna. One mention Sety Is Temple of
Millions of Years (tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt nsw bit mn-mAat-ra, DeM 23) and another refers to
a great vineyard belonging to Merenptah (pA kAmw aA n mr-n-ptH htp Hr mAat, DeM 114).
One estate (pr) belonging to Montu, the Lord of Heliopolis, contributed a further
example of irp nfr (DeM 17). One good wine of day 3 came from an unknown domain
(Hwt []) which belonged to the Estate of Amun (pr imn; DeM 84). Three toponyms that
were difficult to interpret occur in connection with irp nfr in the Deir el-Medina material.
In one case it is written good wine of Tjaru (TArw; DeM 28), possibly a reference to a
vineyard in the Eastern Delta (see below). One other label refers to the vineyard to the
west of irn (or irnt) by the river (pA kA[mw] Hr imnt irn / irnt m itr, DeM 42) and another
33
to a good wine of Siny (siny; DeM 38). The location of either irn or siny are known
(see below).
Seven wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina belong to the category very good
wine (irp nfr nfr). There are several labels that mention vineyards. One from the great
vineyard (pA kAmw aA; DeM 43), another from the domains vineyard (DeM 61), and a
third only has the vineyard preserved as a source (DeM 207). One irp nfr nfr is a wine
of day 3, belonging to the vineyard of the first priest of Ramses (II?) (DeM 81). The
Estate of Amun in Thebes is found on one example (DeM 82). Another irp nfr nfr is said
to come from the mr-river (itr mr; DeM 124), the location of which is unknown but
which could have been situated somewhere in the Delta. One jar label marked with irp
nfr nfr lacks any other information (DeM 143).
Another way of differentiating irp-wine is with the adjective nDm (sweet). There
are three examples of irp nDm in the Amarna material. None of these gives any distinctive
information about their source or ownership (Am 193, 194, 195). Four jars labeled irp
nDm were discovered in the tomb of Tutankhamun. These came from different Aton
estates (pr itn): in Tjaru (Tut 8), Karet (Tut 12) and in the area of the Western River (Tut
1, 10). Two labels with irp nDm from Deir el-Medina are connected to Amun (nAy n imn,
DeM 77) and the domain of Seti I (DeM 134).
One very fragmented label from Amarna (Am 203) has been reconstructed to read
nfr [nDm], possibly a classification of an irp nfr nDm, good, sweet wine, without any
other information.
The analysis above does not answer the initial question; if it is possible to see if
the better wine has a distinctive source of production or ownership. On the contrary the
better wine came from varying places and / or belonged to different domains / estates.
SdH
SdH-wine is commonly found with the classifications nfr (good) or nfr nfr (very good;
Tallet 1995: 464-470; Murray 2000: 593). In the three groups of material the
classification nfr nfr (very good) is the only one found for the SdH-wines. There are three
examples from Amarna (Am 32, 34, 205) and three from Tutankhamuns tomb (Tut 3, 5,
13). Furthermore, there are four unclassified SdH-wines from Amarna (Am 33, 73, 185,
204), all of which, except one (Am 73), are damaged where the classification should have
been. The three jars labeled SdH from Tutankhamuns tomb are classified very good
quality and all three come from the Estate of Aton. One SdH-wine jar label from the
Workmans Village at Amarna has the classification good (nfr, Leahy 1985: 72, fig.
34
6.13, no. 97). The classified wine SdH nfr is also found on a seal from Tutankhamuns
tomb (Hope 1993: 108, fig. 5, no. XXVII).
Information regarding the quality of SdH-wine examined here has been found on
wine jar labels and seals from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb as well as on two recent
finds: a wine jar label from Saqqara and a seal from Medinet Habu, thought to originate
from Horhemhebs reign (1323-1295 B.C., van Dijk 1992: 27, fig. 4; Hope 1993: 91-136;
Tallet 1995: 468-470). Five preserved wine-stopper seals from jars said to contain SdH
have been found in Tutankhamuns tomb. Three of the seals came from wine jars that
also had a wine jar label on its surface (Tut 3, 5, 6). The other two seals came from
vessels that were lacking labels on the vessel surface (Hope 1993: 106-108, figs 4-5;
Tallet 1995: 469). Some problems occurred with the interpretation of Tut 6, because the
text on the wine jar label mentioned irp as the type of wine while the seal mentioned SdH
(Hope 1993: 108, fig. 5, no. XXV; Tallet 1995: 468). The stopper for the wine jar Tut
13, earlier missing but now found, was stamped with a seal that mentioned SdH-wine
(ern 1965: 2; Hope 1993: 108, fig. 5, no. XXVI, 126, no. 41; Tallet 1995: 469). The
classification on the wine jar label Am 32 is indistinct with Petries publication (1894: Pl.
XXIV, no. 63) showing damage at the area where the classification is usually found.
ern (notebook 17.54, p 23) on the other hand transcribed the wine jar label as SdH nfr
nfr.
These seals and wine jar labels confirm that SdH-wine was often classified and it
was only in rare cases that this was omitted (Tallet 1995: 470).
There is no evidence that the designation nDm (sweet) occurs in connection with
SdH-wines in material investigated here. Only one wine jar label from Saqqara describes
the SdH-wine as nDm (van Dijk 1992: 27-28, fig. 4; Tallet 1995: 4679), corresponding to
the description in the love song: The shedeh-wine, sweetness is in my mouth (SdH pA
nDm m r(A)=i; P. Harris 500: Group B, stanza 4, 5,1-5,3, cf. Fox 1985: 21 with n. b;
Mathieu 1996: 62).
Note Tallets reference to fig. 5, rather than the correct fig. 4 in van Dijks publication (van Dijk 1992:
27-28).
35
time of Ramses IX shows that nfr nfr nfr nfr was used for galena, which was a mineral
used in eye make-up. A delivery of galena was returned because it was of poor quality
and a delivery of 100 deben of msdmt nfr nfr nfr nfr was expected (Helck 1967: 147,
letter B, line 32-33), showing that quality classifications using more than two nfr did
occur.
A seal from Amarna can possibly have been the source for reading a classification
as having more than two nfr-signs. One damaged seal is documented where a nfr-sign is
placed on either side of a pot sign
(Pendlebury 1951: Pl. LXXXI, no. 27). The same
combination of signs appears on four other, undamaged, seals (Pendlebury 1951: Pl.
LXXXI, no. 51, 52, Pl. LXXXII, no. 99, 102). These five seals show that this
arrangement of signs was used on stamps, but it does not support a common classification
of wine with more than two nfr-signs.
However, there are two seals in the Amarna material that belong to jars of irpwine, that show a classification consisting of more than two nfr-signs. One seal has three
clear nfr-signs written on it (Pendlebury 1951: Pl. LXXXII, no. 104) and the other has
four clear nfr-signs (Petrie 1894: Pl. XXI, no. 10). A classification consisting of three
nfr-signs could have existed during 18th dynasty (Wb II: 253) as a rare phenomenon and
probably occurred among the seals from Amarna. Therefore, a classification of wine with
three or more nfr-signs should be considered as very unusual, although possible.
36
68.9%. The occurrence of irp nDm, (sweet wine), is relatively frequent with 45 out of 232
labels (19.3%). The smallest group was irp nfr nfr, (very good wine) with 27 out of 232
labels (11.6%).
There are similarities in the known share of classified wines at Amarna and Deir
el-Medina and the Ramesseum, where approximately 10% of all wine jar labels have a
classification. This conclusion comes with a reservation, because of damage to the texts it
is impossible to estimate the real number of classified wines. The wine from
Tutankhamuns tomb differs from the others, with one third of the wines being classified.
(9)
hrw 5
(3)
hrw 6
(2)
DeM 19, 63
hrw 7
(1)
DeM 87
hrw ?
(2)
On 17 labels, from the Deir el-Medina material, irp is followed by the phrase n hrw X n
(wine of day X of ...). The phrase accompanies a reference to the vineyard (pA kAmw),
the great or large vineyard (pA kAmw aA ), the baH or the great or large baH (n baH aA ). The
name of an institution can also follow. Four specific days occurs in this material, with
Day 3 being the most cited. There is some uncertainty as to what this phrase refers. It is
defined by a genitive n, which connects the phrase to the wine and to the production
place (kAmw or baH, DeM 87, see below) or to the institution that owns the wine. The
day marker is most likely as an attribute of quality. In this material it is combined with a
classification of quality nfr (good, DeM 84) nfr nfr (very good, DeM 81) and nDm (sweet,
DeM 77).
The considerably lager material from the Ramesseum (Spiegelberg 1898: Pl.
XIX-XXXVA; Bouvier 1999-2001: Fasc. I-IV) also has examples of this phrase. The
distribution of days is different and extends from Day 3 to 25 (see compilation below)
with emphasis on Day 7. Besides references to the vineyard (pA kAmw) and the baH, there
are also references to the great or large vineyard and baH (pA kAmw aA and n baH aA).
37
hrw 11
hrw 5
hrw 12
hrw 6
hrw 13
hrw 7
23
hrw 16
hrw 8
hrw 25
hrw 9
hrw ?
12
hrw 10
The position of the phrase with a genitive n directly after irp, or irp + a notation of
quality nfr and so on, indicates that this should be considered as an attribute of the wine,
perhaps an additional way of defining the quality by telling which day the wine was
tapped.
Wine of hA nfr
tp xt r-pr imn
38
In connection with the publication of a writing board (BM 5647), Peet (1927: 90-93)
discussed two examples of the phrase found on the verso.
10
39
1)
2)
ern translated the text: lan 32, vin du Haytnofret, Kabshu (ern, notebook MSS
1.191). Fairman (1951: 163, n. 3) referred to erns planned (but not realized)
publication of this wine jar label and included the transcription:
1)
2)
It is notable that Fairmans transcription does not altogether correspond with erns. For
example, the year is changed from 32 to 22 and ern saw more signs than Fairman in
the writing of qAb-Swt. Fairman also replaced the niwt-sign with an empty circle
(Gardiners Sign List N33, cf. above discussion of iArrt). Instead a niwt-sign is found
after qAb-Swt.
The wine jar label from the published Amarna material does not correspond to
the one Fairman describes in his text. Furthermore, Fairman omitted erns discussion
of hAyt nfrt as a place name (Fairman 1951: 163), which shows that he considered the
classification theory as the most credible.
In the Amarna material this wine jar label occurs with the phrase hAy nfr in the text (see
above). There are no traces of a second line (Pendlebury 1951: Pl. XCI, no. 174) and it
was noted that nfr is followed by an ii-sign (Gardiners Sign List M18), possibly
another reading of the sign (Gardiners Sign List Q7) which was seen on the label from
Khas tomb (1920: 153, fig. 137). In the hieratic text, the signs and are not particularly
similar, so it is difficult to understand why the transcription as the ii-sign was made. This
is Fairmans own reading of the label. It is not transcribed in the notebooks, so it is
probable that ern did not see it.
Two wine jar labels from Malqata made a further contribution to the discussion.
Hayes (1951: 89, Fig. 4, Nos 2, 4) published two labels with this phrase11. These two
11
Hayes only published types and did not transcribe all jar labels. Therefore, it was uncertain if there were
any other labels with this phrase. Going through the labels when visiting The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York, it was possible to establish that these two are the only ones in the Malqata material.
40
or
1)
and
1)
Hayes preferred to read the text more literally than previous researchers and referred to
the verb hAi (to go down, Faulkner 1962: 156) which was indicated by the walking legs.
The translations wine for a happy return (?), wine for a good going-down or wine
which goes down well were suggested (Hayes 1951: 89, n. 104). The latter two
translations contribute to the classification discussion, while the first translation could,
considering the walking legs in the word hAy, have the meaning of return (to Egypt,
Hayes 1951: 89, n. 104).
When reviewing the material from Deir el-Medina there was an additional wine
jar label with this phrase that can be added to this small and rare collection (DeM 72;
Koenig 1980: Pl. 44-44a, no. 6360).
1)
2)
The similarity with the label that was found at Amenhotep, son of Hapus, temple and
then was transcribed in erns notebook (notebook MSS 1.191 and above) is striking.
This one from Deir el-Medina has been translated Year 22, wine of hAyt nfrt, Kabshu
(HAt sp 22 irp n hAyt nfrt qAb-Swt).
The translation of hAy[t] nfr[t] is still uncertain but merry-making is a
tempting suggestion. Hannig (1995: 486) proposes a similar translation of the phrase
Wein der Lustbarkeit, in English wine of amusement. The place of the phrase, as an
attribute to the irp-wine, indicates that it is a kind of classification. Also, considering that
Peet identified the phrase on a writing-board (BM 5647) where it is found after the word
for wine (irp) and before the reference to one mnt-vessel, it is difficult to think hAy[t]
nfrt could refer to a location. On the contrary, the position of the phrase indicates that it
represents some kind of classification. The phrase is translated merry-making here
41
following Peet. It is notable that this classification only exists for irp-wines and not for
SdH12.
The phrase may refer to donations, or possibly coercive taxation, where the tenth was
given to the god Aton or from an official to the king.
12
42
The term mD does not appear in the materials from Tutankhamuns tomb or Deir
el-Medina or in similar materials from Malqata and the Ramesseum.
Another term that occurs in the collected material is inyt, possibly a Late
Egyptian writing of inw (product, gift or tribute; Faulkner 1962: 22). This reading is
relatively explicit on the label DeM 194 which has the heading inyt kA-sA (gift of / to
Kasa). The text continues with the Year date and description of the wine, but does not
give any information as to whether Kasa is the receiver or donor.
On label Am 166 the expression is used at the end of the very fragmentary text
inyt [n] itn (gift [for] (?) Aton) and on label Am 3 the expression appears in the sentence
irp nfr nfr n pA inw [] (very good wine of / from this gift / tribute []). Bleiberg (1996:
100) thinks that inw was a small but needful part of the goods consumed by the royal
family13.
Wine could have been donated from an individual to, e.g., the temple cult or as
burial goods. This is supported by a label from Tutankhamuns tomb (Tut 26). The text is
limited to a title and a name TAty pntw (Vizier Pentu).
In the material there is one label that names the left team of workmen in Deir elMedina as the receiver of the wine jar (irp tA rit smHy, wine for the left side, DeM 46).
Dated Year 53, this donation came from the reign of Ramses II.
13
43
1963: 1121 (no. 213) 1135 (nos 30914, 310, 311) 1136 (nos 312, 316, 317, 318) 1185
(nos 747, 748) 1187 (no. 76515); er-Raziq 1979: 242).
A new form of the writing of this word appears on the Kamose stela from the end
of the Second Intermediate (1555-1550 B.C.), where kAnw appears to have developed into
kAmw (vineyard) with the alphabetic writing
. This appears to be the
earliest known example of the word kAmw (Habachi 1972: 32, 36, l. 11, n. e; er-Raziq
1979: 24216; cf. Wb V: 106).
This form was soon abandoned for another combination of signs,
,
th
th
which during the 18 -19 dynasties became the standard form of the word (Lesko DLE
IV: 34). Brunner (1944: 34) proposed that the word originated from the time of Hyksos
rule when it seemed that a vineyard was a luxury that belonged to the Hyksos ruler. The
older Egyptian word kAnw was abandoned and replaced by kAmw, of a possibly Semitic
origin, by the end of the Second Intermediate (Brunner 1944: 34, er-Raziq 1979: 240241).
From the Old to the New Kingdom, the signs and
appear as alternative
determinatives in the words kAnw
and
or kAmw
(Kaplony
1963: 1186 (no. 757); er-Raziq 1979: 242-243; cf. Wb V: 106).
The word baH (inundation, flood, irrigate, basin; DLE I: 152; Wb I: 448-449) as a
description for a vineyard, is commonly written
, with other variations. It
appears rarely during the Old and Middle Kingdoms but it is found more frequently
during the New Kingdom (cf. Wb I: 448-450). Interpreted to refer to irrigation (Faulkner
1962: 81), the use of the word can be seen in relation to a period when many vineyards
were established in the Delta and where irrigation through canals was needed as support
in drier areas.
Different determinatives could be included in the writings for kAmw and baH. In
kAmw a pr-sign
(Gardiners Sign List O1) could occur and for the word baH, the signs
for water and canal
are found. Er-Raziq (1979: 229) thinks that the vineyard was
walled as protection. The kAmw vineyard should therefore be seen as an enclosed area and
baH as an area with an irrigation construction.
How large a kAmw or a baH could have been has been discussed. Er-Raziq (1979:
229) says that during New Kingdom the
-sign began to be used regularly as a
14
According to er-Raziq the seal 308 was from a wine jar but it appears to be seal 309 (quoted above) that
he was referring to.
15
In er-Raziqs catalogue he has missed that the combination of signs consisted of
and not only of a
simple stand for grapes.
16
The reference in er-Raziq 1979: 242 to Kamose ADAW 8, P. 36 should be to Kamose ADIK 8, P. 36.
44
determinative in the word kAmw and he sees this as a reference to a walled garden. This
writing for vineyard was also noted in the primary sources compiled for this study (cf. for
instance Am 175, DeM 9).
In Metjens tomb, dated to the 3rd dynasty (2686-2613 B.C.) there is an
inscription that describes a vineyard (kAnw) as measuring 1 xA + 2 tA and 1 aurora (sTA)
within the walls (Urk. I, 5). One sTA is equal to 2,735 m2 and one xA measures 10 sTA
which is 27,350 m2 (Gardiner 1948c: 60, 1957: 200). The measurements represented by
tA are unknown. Er-Raziq (1979: 229) says that the area referred to in Metjens text
would have equaled 114,870 m2.
At Tell el-Dabaa, Beitak (1985: 275) has identified a winery inside a walled
temple area, probably a sacred space, which he dates from the end of Hyksos period
(1650-1550 B.C.) to the early 18th dynasty (1550-1069 B.C.). He does not say anything
about the size of this area. The writing for kAmw appears with a pr-sign as a determinative
for the first time on the Kamose stele (1555-1550 B.C.) and this pr-sign could refer to the
Hyksos rulers enclosed, luxury vineyards (Habachi 1972: 36, l. 11; er-Raziq 1979: 240;
Beitak 1985: 276).
An establishment south of the city of Amarna has also been found. A large,
enclosed area equipped with 816 poles form seven halls, covering a total surface of 1.26
hectares. Within this area were traces of plants, which were interpreted as remnants from
a vineyard (Traunecker 1984: 286-290, Tallet 1998b: 244). Earlier Fairman (1951: 167168) expressed uncertainty about whether a vineyard could have existed in the region
while Pendlebury (1935: 131) in his preliminary report from the excavation season 19341935 referred to a vineyard as one of three possible interpretations of the area. Recent
research seems to find it probable that a vineyard could have existed as far south as
Amarna (Traunecker 1984: 286-290, Tallet 1998b: 244).
The examples cited above highlight that it is impossible, on the basis of the
determinative, to determine the size of a vineyard whether it was called kAmw or baH. The
choice of determinative most likely was unrelated to the size of the area. Furthermore,
baH as a word for vineyard is used infrequently and during such a short time, while kAmw
was the generic word for vineyard from Second Intermediate Period (1650-1550 B.C.)
and onwards.
45
artificial lake
kAmw vineyard
Am 175
In the material from Amarna the concept baH dominates in terms of the origin of wine.
Five labels for irp-wines and two for SdH-wines cite the origin as a baH (flood, basin).
Only one label has a kAmw (vineyard) as an origin. However, the term kAmw appears
frequently in the title of responsible officials (cf. discussion below).
Even if the word kAmw was used for vineyard, it appears only rarely in the Amarna
material. It is possible that a vineyard connected to Amarna has been found to the south
of the city. The area, excavated by Traunecker (1984: 286-290), could perhaps explain
the use of some of the terms below.
Additional terms for wine production areas
irp-wine
pA Xnm basin
Sd artificial lake / pool
mi-SA irrigated area
SdH-wine
idHw marshes
Am 205
Some occasional wine jar labels in the Amarna material use terms such as pA Xnm (basin),
mi-SA (irrigated area), Sd (artificial lake / pool) and idHw (marshes) with diffuse origin.
Some of these terms may refer to viticulture south of Amarna (Wb I: 155 idHw, II: 155
mi-SA, IV: 567 Sd; DLE I: 64, idH, II: 207 Xnn, III: 172 Sdt; Faulkner 1962: 36 idHw, 202
Xnm, 274 Sd). Furthermore, there is one wine jar label (Am 193) in this material where
the first line reads n itr n baH (of the river of the flood basin). No equivalent terms were
found on the wine jar labels from the Workmans Village in Amarna (Leahy 1985: 66109).
46
artificial lake)
pA kAmw aA (The Great Vineyard)
DeM 12, 13, 43, 48, 79, 86, 93, 109, 114
DeM 3, 5, 9, 11, 15, 22, 26, 30, 41, 42, 44, 47, 61, 66, 76,
90, 97, 104, 105, 116, 120, 126, 127, 137, 147, 165, 166,
179, 182, 184, 198, 207
From Deir el-Medina 36 wine jar labels convey the information that irp-wine came from
a kAmw (vineyard) and on 18 wine jar labels kAmw is found at the beginning of a damaged
text, so it can not be determined if the jar contained a irp- or a SdH-wine. One label placed
a kAmw (vineyard) in Tjaru in the eastern Delta (DeM 126). The material from Deir elMedina also has references to pA kAmw aA (The Great Vineyard) which suggests that a
hierarchy existed between the vineyards and this could possibly have been based on size.
All together 51 wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina mention the kAmw (vineyard)
comparing to the single label from Amarna. The term baH (basin) only appears on two
wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina, comparing with the seven labels from Amarna.
The Ramesseum kAmw and baH
The use of kAmw and baH in the material from Ramesseum shows an emphasis on kAmw.
There are 540 wine jar labels of the total 2693 (Spiegelberg 1898: Pl. XIX-XXXVA;
Bouvier 1999-2001: Fasc. I-IV), with the terms kAmw or baH preserved. Of these, 369
wine jar labels contained the word kAmw (vineyard), but the total number may have been
larger, as damage obscured the reading in some cases. The term baH (basin) appears on
171 wine jar labels.
Finally it can be said that comparing the materials from Amarna and Deir el-Medina there
is a clear difference in the use of kAmw and baH as viticulture areas. The difference does
not appear to reflect relative size. Instead the word aA (great) could have been used as a
marker of size. The presence of a relatively large number of labels that refer to a baH-area
excludes the possibility of the two words being synonymous and used for lexicographic
variation. Perhaps Amarnas location in Middle Egypt had an effect on the choice of
growing areas and the use of artificial irrigation.
47
DeM 85 ()
nAy ra-ms-sw-mr-imn
The phrase (m) nAy (in / from these; cf. Junge 2001: 51-54) appears occasionally to
describe the property of the vineyard (kAmw). Five labels combine nAy with Amun, which
indicates that this was a way of describing the temple or estate of Amun as the owner.
Two labels connect the phrase with the royal name Ramses, (DeM 30, 85), one (DeM 30)
relates the vineyard of the Temple of Millions of Years of Ramses IV to these of
Ramses which is on the shore of the ptr-river.
That described as nAy ra-ms-sw-mr-imn has been interpreted as Pi-Ramses
(Gardiner 1918: 188, Bouvier 2003: 196). Spiegelberg (1923: 31) connects nAy imn to the
Ramesseum when he found it written on eight wine jar labels from that temple
(Spiegelberg 1898: Pl. XX, no. 147, XXII, no. 170, XXVII, no. 224, XXVIII, no. 233,
XXXI, no. 259, XXXII, no. 266, XXXIV, no. 294, XXXV, no. 298). Hamada (1947:
19) translated a text on a statue of the flag-bearer Amenmose, that states that he is the one
who took care of what belonged to Amun (nAy imn). Further, Hamada (1947: 15-16) says
that Amenmose was working in the temple of Amun-Re, which was located at the
Western River (itr imnt) in the Delta. It is not until the end of the text that the Temple of
Millions of Years (tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt) is mentioned. This place is said to be in the Estate
of Amun (pr imn) to the west of Thebes (Hamada 1947: 19). This leads to the conclusion
that the place where Amenmose worked was not the Ramesseum. Gardiner (1948b:1920) also argued that the place for nAy imn was at the Western River and he thought it
could have been north of the river in the northwestern Delta. Gardiner (1948b: 22, n. 3)
proposes that the Temple of Millions of Years could be a reference to the funerary temple
of Ramses III at Medinet Habu. Also Helck (1963: 729) refers to Hamadas and
Gardiners articles and speaks of an Overseer of Works of nAy imn, which was at the
Western River, where the overseer says he had built temples and vineyards in the area of
Amuns temple. Haring (1997: 355) and Bouvier (2003: 194) both state that nAy imn and
48
the Ramesseum belong together and furthermore, Haring says that two olive gardens
were a part of nAy imn and that they belonged to the Ramesseum.
4.3.2 Institutions
Wine can be described as belonging to the vineyard (irp n pA kAmw) or belonging to an
estate or domain (irp n pr / Hwt). Reference to the vineyard (pA kAmw) can be excluded so
that wine is only described as of (n) the estate or domain. The vineyards were
subordinate to different estates and domains. These could be a part of administrative and
economics units, such as temples or royal palaces (Spencer 1984: 4). These
administrative units are said to belong to a god or a king. In some cases even royal
women are connected to estates (pr) as are officials, if more seldom.
The word Hwt (temple / domain) came into use as a general term during the Early
Dynastic Period. The term appears to have referred to major estates that supported royal
funerary cults (Spencer 1984: 21-23). The term tA Hwt was used in the New Kingdom for
the royal funerary temples that lined the West Bank at Thebes. The institution tA Hwt n HH
m rnpt (the Temple of Millions of Years) referred in most cases to the royal funerary
temples at Thebes but could also be used for all temples that supported the cult of the
deceased king (Spencer 1984: 7, 25-26). Spiegelberg (1923: 31) however identified tA
Hwt n HH m rnpt specifically as the Ramesseum, but this limited interpretation seems to
have been abandoned.
The term pr (estate) began to be used in the Early Dynastic Period and by the Old
Kingdom had come into common usage. Estate could on one hand describe a property
that belonged to the king, a royal woman or an official, but on the other, it could also be
used for an administrative unit belonging to a temple, as well as the building itself, the
house. The pr in its larger meaning could possess land and property under the
administrative control of an individual (Spencer 1984: 14-16, Hggman 2002: 54). The
word pr could also be used, in its sense of house to describe the royal palace, as the
house of the king (pr nsw). All estates could furthermore be subordinated to the Great
House (pr-aA), a term that connotates the totality of the royal administration. Within the
divine sphere, the word pr was used as a synonym for the temple designation Hwt nTr (the
House / Palace / Domain of the god). With a large degree of overlapping in meaning, it
can often be difficult to identify the most appropriate translation of the word pr in a text
(Spencer 1984: 17, Bleiberg 1996: 18-19, Hggman 2002: 55, 79).
49
pr itn
pr anx-itn
pr itn tH
Am 206
pr Hai n pA itn
Am 118
pr sHtp-itn
Re
pr ra
Estate of Re (1)
Am 13
pr anx-ra
Am 127
pr ra-Hr-Axty
pr sHtp-ra
Am 5
tA Swt anx-ra
Am 136, 137
tA Swt
Swt-chapel (2)
Am 135, 138
Am 168
Amun
pr imn m wAst
Institutions (Hwt and pr) are divided among gods, kings, royal women and officials in the
material from Amarna (cf. below). There are also cases where Hwt and pr appear without
any further attribution.
In Amarna pr dominates as a designation for an institution, probably because the
large Aton temple was called the Estate of Aton (pr itn) (Pendlebury 1935: 70). Evidence
50
of Hwt only appears on nine labels. On four wine jar labels the institution tA Swt (Swtchapel) is mentioned.
Institutions that were connected with the god Aton are well represented in this
material. Of the six institution names, Estate of Aton (pr itn) is the one found most
frequently. There are six labels that read the Temple of the Aton (tA Hwt pA itn), possibly
a reference to the small temple in Amarna (Pendlebury 1951: 92). The institution Estate
of Rejoicing for the Aton (pr Hai n pA itn) is mentioned on one label and is a part of the
large Aton temple, located just beyond the temples entrance (Pendlebury 1951: Pl. I).
This label was found in the sanctuary of the Aton temple, not far from the area of the pr
Hai n pA itn.
There are five labels that include the name of the god Re. The Swt chapel had a
direct connection to the god Re and is known from the New Kingdom (cf. e.g.
Stadelmann 1969: 159). In P. Wilbur I (Gardiner 1948c: 16) there is a Swt-chapel of ReHorakhty (Swt-ra-Hr-Axty) which owned and cultivated land with its own administration
and priesthood. In Amarna some of these chapels were connected to the royal women:
Teye, Meritaten and probably also Nefertiti, Kia and Ankhesenpaaten (Spencer 1984:
120-125).
One temple (pr) with the name itn tH (Atons Gleaming) is mentioned both in the
material from Amarna and Deir el-Medina (see below) but is missing in the material from
Tutankhamuns tomb.
Amarna - Royal institutions
tA Hwt aA-xpr-kA-ra
Am 10
(Thutmosis I) (1)
tA Hwt nb-[mAat]-ra
Am 47, 48
Am 4, 7, 44, 45
pr nsw Ax-n-itn
Am 55
pr Ax-n-itn
Am 8, 50, 51, 54
pr anx-xprw-ra
Am 64
pr smnx-kA-ra
Am 63
Am 62
pr nsw [...]
Am 59
51
Hwt (temple / domain) appears in combination with royal names on three wine jar labels
in Amarna. On one wine jar label the domain belongs to Thutmosis I (1504-1492 B.C.)
and on the two others Amenhotep III (1390-1352 B.C.) is mentioned. On 11 wine jar
labels the institution term pr (estate) is used in combination with a royal name. In this
group Amenhotep III is mentioned on four labels, Akhenatons name (1352-1336 B.C.) is
on five of the labels and Smenkhkare (1338-1336 B.C.) on two.
Amarna - Institutions of the royal women
pr tiy
Am 14, 54
Am 70
pr nfr-nfrw-iti-itn
Am 56, 57
pr Hmt nsw
Am 36
Am 67, 68
Am 65
A number of royal women have their own estates. The kings daughters are identified
with the title sAt nsw and three cases, the title wife of the king (Hmt nsw) is treated like
a name and put in a cartouche (Am 11, 36, 61). The women identified by name are well
known. Teye was the wife of Amenhotep III and mother of Akhenaton (Troy 1986: 166;
Shaw 2000: 261) and Baketaten was daughter of Amenhotep III and Teye (Fairman 1951:
164; Troy 1986: 166). In this material, Nefertiti, referred to as Neferneferu-Aton, and was
the wife of Akhenaton (Troy 1986: 167). Meritaten and Meketaten were the daughters of
Akhenaton and Nefertiti (Troy 1986: 167). On one label (Am 69) Ankhesenpaaten (sAt
nsw anx-sn-pA-itn) is also named, she was daughter of Akhenaton and Nefertiti and wife
of Tutankhamun (Troy 1986: 167). Unfortunately no reference to an institution
designation in front of the title and name has survived.
The number of labels in this group is small and the term Hwt (temple / domain)
does not appear in combination with female names. However, there is one label (Am 54)
that has the Estate of Akhenaton (pr AX-n-itn) in line 1 and the Estate of Teye (pr tiy) in
line 2. No further information is given however, a possible interpretation could be that the
first reference was to the place for production and the second to the recipient of the jar.
Another possibility is that the Estate of Akhenaton was the main institute of which the
Estate of Teye was a part.
52
pr imy-r xtm
Am 150
pr imy-r
Am 149
A group of nine wine jar labels documents a small number of officials, connected in some
way to Amarna, with the institution designation pr (estate), but without any personal
names. Seven of these include the priest title wr mAw (Great Seer), a reference to the high
priest of the cult of Aton, while one wine jar label reads imy-r xtm (Overseer of the Seal)
and another only imy-r (Overseer).
Amarna miscellaneous institutions
pr xa-m-wAst
Am 9
pr xa=f
Am 143
pr wAt-inr-sw
Am 198
pr []
Estate [] (7)
tA Hwt []
On some wine jar labels in the Amarna material the institution designation pr (estate) is
used without specific names. One label has the Estate of the One who Appears in Thebes
(pr xa-m-wAst), another reads the Estate of His Appearance (pr xa=f) and finally there is
one label where translation is not possible: pr wAt-inr-sw (Estate of wAt-inr-sw).
There is also one group of wine jar labels where the terms Hwt and pr occur but
the text is damaged so it is impossible to discern which institutions may have been
intended. Three of the damaged wine jar labels refer to an institution tA Hwt [] (domain
[]) and seven mention the institution pr [] (estate []). No additional information
can be read.
Sixteen labels in the Amarna material identified classified wines. These were not
connected to any specific institution, leaving the question of whether one delivered better
wine than another unanswered.
53
Tut 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13 18, 20, 21
pr twt-anx-imn
Tut 4, 15
pr twt-anx-imn HqA-
iwn-Smaw
The institution designation pr (estate) was the only one in use in the material from
Tutankhamuns tomb. It is found in combination with the god Atons name on 15 wine
jar labels and with Tutankhamuns own on seven labels.
Distributed according to wine with a quality classification, pr itn (Estate of Aton)
is associated with eight unclassified irp-wines, four irp nDm (sweet wine) and three SdH
nfr nfr (very good shedeh-wine) while pr twt-anx-imn (Estate of Tutankhamun) is, in
contrast, only connected with seven unclassified irp-wines. The occurrence of the Estate
of Aton also presents an interesting chronological issue because the name Tutankhamun
refers to a time when the Aton cult was largely abandoned.
Deir el-Medina Divine institutions
pr imn
pr imn-ra
pr itn tH
DeM 67, 68
pr pn m pA mw n ptH
DeM 45
pr mntw
DeM 17
pr Hwt-Hr
DeM 24, 25
pr xnsw
DeM 4
Hwt nTr
Temple (1)
DeM 198
The material from Deir el-Medina exhibits richer and somewhat different combinations.
The institution designations are limited to Hwt (temple / domain) and pr (estate). The
institution designation Hwt (temple / domain) appears in combination with a kings name
but not with the name of a god. The term Hwt only occurs combined with the word nTr,
god, giving the generic term for temple Hwt-nTr.
54
Twenty-nine wine jar labels in the Deir el-Medina material use the institution
designation pr (estate) in combination with a name of a god. On 19 labels Amuns name
is found and on four, Amun-Re. There are two wine jar labels with references to pr itn tH
(Estate of Atons Gleaming) but these two date to the reign of Amenhotep III.
Furthermore, the name of this institution is on line 2 of the label text which may indicate
a different status for the institution, such as the destination of the wine rather than the
owner of a vineyard.
Deir el-Medina Royal institutions
Thutmosis III
pr mn-xpr-ra
tA Hwt nb-mAat-ra
pr nb-mAat-re
DeM 67
DeM 111
Amenhotep III
Aye
tA Hwt xpr-xprw-ra-[]
Horemheb
tA Hwt Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n- The Domain of Djeserkheperurera
Setepenre (3)
pr Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n-ra
Estate of Djeserkheperure-Setepenre
(7)
Seti I
tA Hwt mn-mAat-ra
bit mn-mAat-ra
DeM 23
pr mn-mAat-ra
DeM 161
pr sty-[mr-n]-ptH
DeM 131
[] mn-[mAat]-ra
[] Men[maat]re (2)
DeM 62, 95
DeM 206
55
Ramses II
tA Hwt wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-
ra
(8)
bit wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra
Setepenre (6)
Merenptah
[] HH rnpt nsw bit bA-n- [The Temple of] Millions of Years of
ra-mr-imn
DeM 50
Ramses III
tA Hwt nsw bit wsr-mAat-
ra-mr-imn
Usermaatre-Meryamun (1)
bit wsr-mAat-ra-mr-imn
DeM 136
DeM 184
Meryamun (1)
Ramses IV
tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt n nsw The Temple of Millions of Years of
bit HqA-mAat-ra-stp-n-imn
mr-imn)
Ramses VI (?)
pr nb-mAat-ra-imn-[]
DeM 102
DeM 53, 65
DeM 196
pr ra-ms-[]
Amenhotep ?
pr imn-htp
Unknown Ramesside king
56
Merytamun
pr sAt nsw Hmt nsw mryt- Estate of the daughter and wife of the
imn
DeM 75
Unknown
pA kAmw n sAt nsw ra-ms- The vineyard of the daughter of the
sw-p-[]
DeM 76
DeM 137
(9)
tA Hwt []
Domain [] (7)
pr []
Estate [] (4)
Unnamed
tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt []
The combination of Hwt (temple / domain) and a kings name is found on 17 wine jar
labels from Deir el-Medina. On eight of these wine jar labels the name of Ramses II
appears, on three wine jar labels Horemheb occurs, two wine jar labels have Amenhotep
III and on one label each, the names of the kings Seti I, Ramses III, and Aye appear.
Finally there is one wine jar label where the kings name is damaged so it is impossible to
identify which Ramesside king it is. There is also one wine jar label that has Hwt (temple /
domain) on the first line and pr (estate) on the second line (DeM 12) and has the
complete prenomen of Ramses II, Usermaatre-Setepenre. Two women are found as
owners of domains: Merytamun, daughter and wife of Ramses II (Troy 1986: 170) and a
damaged and unidentified name reading Ramses[p]-[].
On ten wine jar labels different royal names are combined with the institution tA
Hwt nt HH m rnpt (Temple of Millions of Years), often connected to the royal funerary
temples on the Theban west bank.
On 22 wine jar labels in the Deir el-Medina material a kings name appears in
combination with the designation pr (estate). Horemhebs name is found on seven of
these. Two wine jar labels have the name of Thutmosis III and two Seti I. The names of
Amenhotep III and Ramses IV are found on one label each. Two wine jar labels only
have the name Amenhotep, although it is unknown to which king this refers, one
possibility is that this is a reference to the deified Amenhotep I. One wine jar label reads
57
Estate of the royal daughter and wife Merytamun and one refers to the Estate of the
Children of the King. Finally, there are five wine jar labels where unknown Ramesside
kings are mentioned but where the texts are too damaged to identify which ones are
named.
In this group, as in the two others, there are a number of wine jar labels where the
texts are damaged at the place where an institution designation would have been found,
so it is no longer possible to read the institution name. Nine wine jar labels name the
institution tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt (the Temple of Millions of Years), seven of the damaged
jar labels have the text the domain [] tA Hwt [] and four read pr [] (estate []).
Also in this material, as in the material from Amarna, the majority of the wine
jars contained unclassified irp-wine. Only five classified wines are associated with a
royal institution. Of these, three are classified as irp nfr (good wine), one as irp nfr nfr
(very good wine) and finally one has the classification irp nDm (sweet wine). These
classified wines were distributed among different institutions and therefore it is not
possible to determine if one institution delivered better wine than another.
The occurrence of the institution designation on the second line of the wine jar
label is problematic given that an institution designation is in most cases found on the
first line. In these cases it should be considered whether this is a reference to the
destination of the wine jar rather that the place of production.
In (?) the Estate of Amun - m pr imn
Estate of Menkheperre (1)
DeM 193
Seti-Merenptah (1)
DeM 188
DeM 21
Usermaatre-Setepenre (1)
DeM 162
DeM 5, 15, 60
DeM 50
Among the institutions found in the material from Deir el-Medina is the Estate of Amun
(pr imn). This designation was used both for the main temple and for several royal
funerary temples on Thebes west bank. These temples were included in the larger
administrative unit also called the Estate of Amun (pr imn) which was controlled by the
high priest of Amun. The smaller estates or domains were probably independent to some
extent but also attached to the main Karnak temple (Eyre 1980: 127; Kemp 1989: 203,
58
fig. 71; Haring 1997: 30-34; Hggman 2002: 135-136, n. 90617). Kemp (1989: 203) says
that this term could designate an area extending on both the east and west banks,
including Karnak. The actual location of the Estate of Amun remains uncertain.
% of the material
Amarna (209)
54
25,8 %
21
80,7 %
24
11,4%
In the material from Amarna, only irp-wine is combined with the Western River, but no
SdH-wine. Both irp- and SdH-wines found in Tutankhamuns tomb were said to come
from itr imnt. In the Deir el-Medina material, that lacked reference to SdH-wines, irpwines have an itr imnt origin.
Deir el-Medina - The Delta branches of the Nile
pA mw n imn
DeM 129
itr aA
kA n kmt
Ka of Egypt (2)
DeM 1, 19
[] kmt
[] Egypt (1)
DeM 87
itr kA
mw n ptH
DeM 45, 49
17
59
pA nTr m pA mw n pra
pA mw n p[A] ra
qaH itm
The material from Deir el-Medina refers to several production places that are not found in
that from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb. References are found to the Water of Amun,
Ptah and Pre, representing Delta branches of the Nile. It would appear that several
vineyards were established at different places in the Delta after the Amarna Period.
The river branch called pA mw n imn (The Water of Amun) flowed in the
northeast of the Delta. This branch separates from itr aA (Great River) north of Busiris,
where The Water of Amun bends to the northeast and the Great River continues to the
north (Bietak 1975: 120-121, Abb. 23; Gardiner 1947: 132-133; Hannig 1995: Maps 3-4).
In the material from Deir el-Medina there are one wine jar label that reads pA mw n imn
and four wine jar labels with itr aA (cf. table above).
A branch of the Western River called Ka of Egypt or The River of the Ka is also
found. It is located in the western Delta (Hannig 1995: Map 2). In the Deir el-Medina
material there are two wine jar labels with the formulation kA n km[t] (Ka of Egypt), five
wine jar labels have itr kA (River of the Ka) and on one label, due to damaged areas, only
kmt (Egypt) remains (cf. table above). Poo (1995: 16) assumed that the river itr kA was
located near to Sais in the western Delta, close to the branch mw n ptH (Water of Ptah,
cf. Bietak 1975: 120-121, Abb. 23). Poo (1995: 16) also observes that itr kA is often found
in connection with mr wAst (Beloved of Thebes) and says that it could indicate that mr
wAst was the vineyards name and that it was located to the west of The River of the Ka
(cf. Spiegelberg 1923: 30-31). The combination of itr kA and mr wAst is only found on one
wine jar label and it is from Deir el-Medina (DeM 64).
The branch which was called Water of Ptah flowed in the northwest of the Delta,
north of the Western River and running out into the Mediterranean through the village
Rosetta (Bietak 1975: 120-121, Abb. 23; Hannig 1995: Map 2). Two wine jar labels from
Deir el-Medina describe the wine from this place. One of the two references is distinct
while the other is damaged and therefore the reading mw n ptH is uncertain. On this label
the name Ptah does not immediately follow after mw n, but occurs on the next line. But
still, this wine jar label has been added to the group because both water and Ptah
occur in the text.
60
A branch called pA mw n pra (The Water of Pre) is found on six wine jar labels
from Deir el-Medina. This branch flows in the southeast part of the Delta, south of PiRamses and north of the village Tjaru/Sile (Bietak 1975: 120-121, Abb. 23; Hannig 1995:
Maps 4 and 7). On three labels, the text reads pA nTr pA mw n pra (the God of the Water of
Pre) where pA nTr (the god) has been added. A branch with that name has not been found
on the maps (Hannig 1995: Map 7), where only pA mw n pra (The Water of Pre) is
mentioned, as is written on the other three wine jar labels.
Another area that is found on four wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina was spt ptr
itr (Shore of the ptr-river) which could have been a river branch or a canal situated close
to Pi-Ramses and branching off to The Water of Pre (pA mw n pra, Bietak 1975: 202,
Abb. 44; Gardiner 1918: 188).
Another district named on the labels is qaH itm (River Bend of Atum), found on
two wine jar labels. Efforts to locate this place have not been successful. Perhaps the
name refers to a small part of a river branch in the Delta. In the eastern Delta a place near
to one river branch is called pr itm (Estate of Atum). A vineyard could have been located
along this branch (Hannig 1995: Map 4). This is however an uncertain hypothesis. The
translation of qaH as river bend is based on the Faulkners reading bend of stream
(Faulkner 1962: 276).
One wine jar label reads m pr imn nty m pA itr n wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra [] (from
Amuns house which is at the river of Usermaatre-Setepenre []) (DeM 60). The river
Usermaatre-Setepenre cannot be exactly located. It may be a branch of the Nile or the
entire river. What can be observed is that pr imn is said to be near the river, which could
point to the previously discussed nAy imn (cf. above).
Fayum district and the oases
mr-tm
Meidum (6)
wHAt rsyt
sA wHAt
Am 79
[] [tA]-iHw
Am 32
wHAt
Oasis (1)
Am 92
In the material from Deir el-Medina, mr-tm (Meidum) is found on six wine jar labels.
This area may have been the in the vicinity of the necropolis area associated with that
name today, east of the Fayum Oasis, between the oasis and the Nile (Hannig 1995:
1346). Meidum does not occur in the material from Amarna. Meidum may have been a
production site that was established after the Amarna period.
61
Several oases from the Western Desert are mentioned in the Amarna material.
They are referred to both specifically by name or with the generic term wHAt (oasis;
Giddy 1987: 39, 77-80). Southern Oasis (wHAt rsyt) may have referred to the Kharga
Oasis but there is some doubt about this interpretation (Giddy 1987: 39, 77-80, 97, 164).
The oasis which is specifically mentioned is sA wHAt (Dakhla Oasis; Fairman 1951: 166;
cf. Giddy 1987: 166) and tA-iHw (Farafra oasis; Giddy 1987: 47, 97, 164). Only six wine
jar labels have these different oases as the place of its origin.
In the Deir el-Medina material, only Meidum is given as an Oasis wine source.
No oasis is found in the material from Tutankhamuns tomb.
Memphis and villages in the Delta
mn-nfr
Memphis (3)
TArw
Tjaru (8)
pr Hbyt
Am 208
Three wine jar labels from Amarna have a reference to mn-nfr (Memphis) that probably
concerns vineyards in the region (Fairman 1951: 166). Memphis is not mentioned on any
of the labels from Tutankhamuns tomb and Deir el-Medina.
The village TArw (Tjaru, also read TAl / Tjal), is included all three groups of
material: Amarna, Tutankhamuns tomb and Deir el-Medina. The location of the village
has been identified as an area in the eastern Delta close to Sile / el-Kantara, possibly near
to the border alongside Sinai (Gardiner 1947: 132-133; Wb V: 355, cf. Hannig 1995: Map
5). In the labels from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb, Tjaru is found on one wine jar
label from each site, while in the material from Deir el-Medina the village is mentioned
on six wine jar labels.
On one wine jar label from Amarna pr Hbyt (Behbeit el-Hagar) is mentioned.
This site is located in the central Delta, slightly northeast of the river branches itr aA
(Great River) and pA mw n imn (Amuns Water; Habachi 1975: 682-683, Map 1b;
Gardiner 1947: 132-133; Hannig 1995: Map 3, cf. Fairman 1951: 166). It is best known
as the site of a Ptolemaic temple.
Heliopolis
iwnw
Heliopolis (5)
Five wine jar labels include references to iwnw (Heliopolis). One of these probably refers
to Heliopolis as the production site of the wine (DeM 186) but damage makes this
62
interpretation uncertain. Two wine jar labels refer to Hathor as the Mistress of Heliopolis
(DeM 24, 25) and one refers to Montu as the Ruler of Heliopolis (DeM 17). Montu was a
warrior god in a falcon form with a residence in the area of Thebes (Morenz 1992: 265).
Hathor is connected to Dendera (Morenz 1992: 89) and a Hathor cult existed in Thebes as
early as the 11th dynasty (Allam 1963: 58-59), suggesting that these two references to
iwnw may relate to Thebes as the Southern Heliopolis.
Unknown locations
A wine production site called qArt/qAyt (Am 195, Tut 12, DeM 43, Hannig 1995: 1391,
DLE IV: 2) is found on three wine jar labels, one each from the three groups of material.
The one from Amarna has the writing qAyt,
and that from Deir el-Medina mr
qAyt;
. It was only on the wine jar label from Tutankhamuns tomb
where it could be clearly read qArt,
. ern (1965: 4) has suggested that it
referred to a place in the eastern Delta, close to Palestine, based on proposed
etymological similarities with Palestinian place names related to a Semitic word for
garden. This conclusion was based on the close connection between the Egyptians and
Palestinians in the area (ern 1965: 4). Hoch (1994: 303) however, says that the word in
Semitic means town, city.
Another place, from which the wine was said to come, is xpSyt
(Khepshyt, DeM 205) but it is uncertain where it is located. Bei er-Rizeiqat as a location
(Hannig 1995: 1374) is doubtful.
Some of the place names found in the material are not otherwise documented (cf.
e.g. Gauthier 1926, Gardiner 1947, Faulkner 1962, Hoch 1994, Hannig 1995: DEL I-IV,
Wb I-V). These places are: siny
(DeM 38), rbnt (?)
(DeM 42)
and itr mr
(DeM 124). All three labels were on vessels containing irp-wine.
From siny came an irp-wine with the classification nfr (good). The place name rbnt is
found in the description in the western rbnt at the river. An irp-wine classified as nfr
nfr (very good) comes from itr mr, a place that could have been located along any of the
Nile branches in the Delta.
Finally, one irp-wine is said to come from n aAmw n pAsSy (of the Asiatics of
pAsSy)
(DeM 18), with pAsSy being unknown. Perhaps
the wine was given as a tribute to the King.
63
64
workmen while e.g. Hry kAmyw might be the supervisor of several vineyards and their
workmen. The possibility of dialect variation has also been discussed (Brunner 1944: 34,
er-Raziq 1979: 239-241). In the table below the title is only presented in the form of Hry
kAmw irrespective the spelling on the wine jar labels, since there is no evidence that the
variations entailed differences in meaning. In the catalogue, however, the word kAmw has
been transliterated according to the way it occurs on the individual label.
Amarna Officials and their titles
Vineyard supervisor - Hry kAmw
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
Any
Am 115
aA-y
Am 35
itr imnt
ann-n-f
Am 118
pr hai n pA itn []
iyr[i]
Am 132
[itr imnt]
iwny []
Am 23
pr itn
ip[i]
Am 164
ipy []
Am 178
ipwy
Am 141
pr sHtp-itn
imn-[]
Am 209
iny
Am 51
Year 14
pr Ax-n-itn
iny
Am 131
pr anx-itn
itn-ipt
Am 81
wxAx-htri-rnpt-hw []
Am 95
Year 7
pr itn
bAkw-[]
Am 9
pr Xa m wAst
pA-[]
Am 72
Year 4
pr ra-Hr-Axty
pA-[]
Am 125
Year 10
pr anx-itn
pA-[]
Am 133
pr anx-i[t]n
pA-idb []
Am 21
pr sHtp itn
pA-nxm-niwt
Am 107
tA wHyt
pA-itn-m-nxt
Am 145
Year 12
pr wr-mAw
pA-Hw
Am 113
pA-Sd
Am 206
Year 9
pr itn tH
pn-[]-yt []
Am 65
Year 13
ma-TAty
Am 88
Year 5
pr i[t]n
mry []
Am 61
65
nA-xy
Am 97
Year 9
pr itn
niAt-tAy
Am 92
Year x+6
pr itn Hr wHAt
nb-mHyt
Am 26
nb-nxt []
Am 71
Year x+[2]
pr ra-[Hr]-[]
nfr-[]
Am 53
[] Ax-n-[itn]
nfr-htp []
Am 42
tA [] pA itn
nfr-sxrw
Am 109
pr [i]tn
rw-[fy] []
Am 83
Year 1
pr [itn]
[] rw-fy
Am 84
itr imnt
rw-fy
Am 85
rma []
Am 94
Year 7
pr itn
hAtAy []
Am 179
HAt-iA []
Am 73
pr ra-Hr-[Axty] []
HAt-ti
Am 29
pr anx-itn
Hwy
Am 25
itr imnt
Hwy n tA [wHyt] []
Am 91
Year x+6
pr itn
Hwy-[nfr]
Am 30
pr anx-itn n itr []
Xay
Am 41
Year 11
pr tky-[]
xAwt-Hbra
Am 181
Xr-tw
Am 52
sn-nfr
Am 96
Year 8
sn-nfr []
Am 100
Year 10
pr itn []
sn-nfr
Am 117
sn-nfr
Am 123
Year x+9
sn-nfr
Am 204
Year 11
[pr] anx-itn
stXi
Am 5
Year 10
pr sHtp-ra
SA-sw-nA
Am 180
qn-Hr-xpS-f
Am 177
[] imnt
tAy-[]
Am 134
[anx]-itn
Label
Year
Place
aA-y
Am 38
pr itn
iy
Am 150
Year x+6
pr imy-r xtm []
iny []
Am 67
Year x+5
bw-[]
Am 149
Year 1
pr imy-r []
66
pn-bA-[]
Am 66
pt-[]
Am 190
Year 16
[ma-Hw]
Am 171
Year 17
[itr] imnt
mry []
Am 191
Year 16
mk
Am 102
Year 14
nfr-rnpt
Am 127
Year 14
nxt
Am 45
Year 17
pr nb-mAat-ra []
r-nbw-i []
Am 80
Hwy []
Am 192
sAkA-iA []
Am 63
Year 1
[qn]-nA
Am 207
Year 14
pr wr mAw m pA Xnm
Titwa
Am 173
ddy []
Am 106
pr itn
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
[]
Am 36, 188
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
sn-nfr
Am 183
Year 11
[] [itr] imnt
Supervisor - Hry
Label
Year
Place
Hri
Am 27
Year 9
pr itn
Hri
Am 93
Year 7
pr itn
Hri []
Am 98
Year 9
pr itn
Tw
Am 28
Year 9
pr itn
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
mry-ra []
Am 3
Year 16
67
Label
Year
Place
sn-nfr
Am 204
Year 11
[pr] anx-itn
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
[...]
Am 165
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
iaH-ms
Am 156
Hwy-pn-xay
Am 76
Year 12
Hwy-pn-xay
Am 151
Year 14
n TArw
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
nb-mHy []
Am 197
Year 9
Personal Name
Label
Year
Place
nfr-rnpt
Am 77
tA Hwt pA itn
Overseer imy-r
Scribe - sS
Guard - sAw
Label
Year
Place
[]-A-rw
Am 20
iwmHst
Am 147
pr wr mAw
iwmHst
Am 148
pr wr mAw
ipy
Am 110
iny
Am 184
pA baH []
pA-Hw
Am 139
Year 1, month 1
pA-[Hw]
Am 140
pA-Hw
Am 142
pr sHtp-itn
pwy
Am 166
may
Am 108
nb-imn
Am 116
nfr-rnpt
Am 201
Year 7
tA Hwt pA itn
68
nny-Hr
Am 19
pr itn []
nxt-pA-itn
Am 112
pr it[n] []
ra-[]
Am 59
Year 13
pr nsw [] [] imntt
rw-fy
Am 84
hAti-Ay
Am 174
hAti-Ay
Am 200
sn-nfr
Am 124
Twy
Am 105
Year 16
[] [i]tr imnt
Twelve different titles were found in the Amarna material: vineyard supervisor (Hry
kAmw, 53 labels), baH supervisor (Hry baH, 17 labels), Leader? of the baH (aA n baH, 2
labels), supervisor (Hry, 1 label), domain inspector or inspector (rmnyt rwDw or rwD, 4
labels), Great Seer (wr mAw, 1 label), Overseer of the xnr-harim (imy[-r] xnr,
reconstructed, 1 label), Overseer (imy-r, 1 label) Royal Scribe (sS nsw, 3 labels), Scribe
(sS, 1 label) and Guard (sAw, 1 label). In addition 20 labels were inscribed with personal
names without their titles being preserved.
The most common title is Hry kAmw followed by Hry baH. The Hry baH was also a
vineyard official, similar to Hry kAmw. Unfortunately, there is no satisfying translation of
the word baH when it is incorporated in a title. The translation the head of floodland
was suggested for Hry baH in the database at the Petrie Museum. Leskos Late Egyptian
Dictionary suggests wine overseer (?) (DLE II: 131).
A different determinative is used for baH when it was included into the title Hry
baH (baH Supervisor) than that found when the word referred to inundated or irrigated land
(cf. Yoyotte 1957: 87, n. 5; Faulkner 1962: 81; Wb I: 450). When baH appears in the title
it sometimes ends with
the pr-sign (Gardiners Sign List O1 cf. e.g. Am 150). When
the word refers to floodland signs for water and canal are found
(cf. Gardiners
Sign List N35ac, N36 and e.g. Am 187).
From Akhenatens Year 13 until the time of Smenkhkara, Hry baH replaces Hry
kAmw, the otherwise most common title for the vineyard supervisor (ern 1964: 38,
Kemp 1985: 66). Hry kAmw was however brought back during the reign of Smenkhkara
and Hry baH was no longer used.
A possible additional title, aA n baH (leader? of the baH) is found on two wine jar
labels (Am 36, 188), as the only preserved information. It is uncertain whether it is
correct to treat this phrase as a title.
The responsible official is identified by the preceding m drt (in the hand of, cf.
ern et al 1993: 121, 7.3.17v). This phrase may refer to the official who had the
69
authority to draft the text for the jars (Am 59, 101, 105, 139, 140). If this is the case, it is
added evidence that the text was written on the jars before they left the vineyard.
Tutankhamuns tomb (KV 62) - Officials and their titles
Vineyard Supervisor - Hry kAmw
Personal Name
Any
apr-rSp
[pA]y (alt [xaa])
pA-wAH
pn-imn
may
nb-nfr
nn
nn
nniA
nxt
nxt-sbk
nxt-sbk
ra-ms
rr
Xaa
Xaay
Xaa
Xaa
Xaa
Xaa
sn-nfr
sn-nfr
Label
Tut 6
Tut 1
Tut 18
Tut 7
Tut 8
Tut 19
Tut 20
Tut 2
Tut 3
Tut 9
Tut 10
Tut 11
Tut 21
Tut 12
Tut 13
Tut 4
Tut 5
Tut 14
Tut 15
Tut 16
Tut 17
Tut 22
Tut 23
Year
Year 5
Year 4
Year 9
Year 5
Year 5
Year 9
Year 9
Year 4
Year 4
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 9
Year 5
Year 5
Year 4
Year 4
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 9
Year 9
Place
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr itn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr itn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr twt-anx-imn
pr itn
pr twt-anx-imn
Vizier - TAty
Personal Name
pntw
Label
Tut 26
Year
-
Place
-
Only two titles are found in the material from the tomb of Tutankhamun: TAty (Vizier) and
Hry kAmw (Vineyard Supervisor). The most common title is Hry kAmw which is found on
23 of the 26 wine jar labels. The title TAty is only on one wine jar label. The title Hry baH,
popular during the reign of Akhenaton, does not occur.
70
The phrase m drt (in the hand of) turns up directly followed by the title Hry kAmw
(Tut 21). It is uncertain if the reading m drt in is correct. It was recorded by Gardiner
when he, together with Carter, studied the wine jar (Carter no. 011-2, Griffith Institute,
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford). When ern later transcribed the phrase, it was as m itr n
(from the river of), making the reading m drt uncertain (ern 1965: 23). It seems that
ern did not read these signs as m drt in. The addition of in, rather than the more
common, but still rare, n is also atypical.
For some reason ern did not use Gardiners reading (ern 1965: 23).
Gardiners original reading m drt in is used here, because erns m itr n (from the river
of) is unconvincing as there is no parallel in this corpus for this kind of reference to a
river. Furthermore, Gardiner had the opportunity to study the wine jar, while ern
states that not only did he not examined the jar, but he also lacked photographs (ern
1965: xii, 3). This reinforces the view that Gardiners reading is the most trustworthy.
Deir el-Medina - Officials and their titles
Vineyard Supervisor - Hry kAmw
Personal Name
Label
imn
DeM 2
imn
DeM 7
Year
Year 11
Year 4
imn
DeM 12
Year 17
imn []
[imn]-[]
imn-m-ipt
DeM 61
DeM 98
DeM 70
imn-m-int
inf-sw-[]
ipAy
apr-bn
wnn-nfr
bA
bA
DeM 181
DeM 123
DeM 199
DeM 187
DeM 121
DeM 56
DeM 81
Year 31
[pA-nxt]
DeM 50
pA-ra
pA-ra []
DeM 71
DeM 90
Place
itr imnt []
tA Hwt Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n-ra []
(Horemheb)
tA Hwt wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra m pr imn
(Ramses II)
tA Hwt []
itr aA
[] [bit] wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra m pr imn
(Ramses II)
tA Hwt wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra (Ramses II)
[] ra-ms-sw-mr-i[mn] [] (Ramses ?)
pr Dsr-Xprw-ra-stp-n-ra (Horemheb)
pA kAmw n Hm-nTr tpy n [] ra-ms-sw-mr[] (Ramses ?)
[] [HH] rnpt nsw bit bA-n-ra-mr-imn []
m pr imn (Merenptah)
tA st mHtt
nA kAmw n pr ra-ms-[] (Ramses ?)
71
pA-rw-[]
pA-Hry-pDt
DeM 93
DeM 16
Year 24
pn-rnw []
DeM 184
pti-Ay
pti-Ay
ptH-m-[Hb-ra]
pt-TA-ry []
mHd-mnw
nb-[]
nb-imn
nfr-mnw
nfr-htp
DeM 45
DeM 25
DeM 145
DeM 139
DeM 140
DeM 156
DeM 97
DeM 135
DeM 108
Year 34
Year 29
-
nfr-[]-imn
DeM 8
Year 2
nxt
nxt-m-ptH
DeM 33
DeM 39
Year 10
-
nxt-tw-imn []
nty
DeM 105
DeM 128
nDm sA Hwy
ra
ra-Hwy
rw-[]
hAw-nfr
HAt-nfrw
Hri
Htpw
Sbk-[]
SA-may
DeM 194
DeM 55
DeM 204
DeM 11
DeM 195
DeM 4
DeM 1
DeM 9
DeM 103
DeM 41
Year 2
Year 3
Year 3
Year 1
Year 26
-
kASAw
DeM 57
Year 24
Try
tm-mHd
DeM 102
DeM 10
Year 3
-
72
tm-mHd
tnr []
DeM 112
DeM 138
pr imn nty m xr
Tay
DeM 23
TAy []
DHwty-m-Hb-ra
DHwty-ms
Hry kAmw, missing name
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
DeM 198
DeM 126
DeM 174
DeM 6
DeM 21
DeM 43
[DeM 47]
DeM 63
Year 13
-
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
DeM 65
DeM 77
DeM 79
DeM 85
DeM 87
DeM 95
DeM 99
DeM 101
DeM 124
DeM 127
DeM 129
DeM 131
DeM 136
DeM 144
DeM 146
DeM 154
DeM 155
DeM 159
DeM 160
DeM 161
DeM 164
DeM 171
DeM 173
DeM 182
DeM 183
Year 36
Year 29
Year 40
Year 12
Year 7
Year 3
Year 39
Year 65
Year 36
Year 24
Year 21
Year 46
Year 9
Year 2
Year 16
Year 11
73
[...]
[...]
[DeM 186]
DeM 192
Year 23
-
[...]
[...]
[...]
DeM 193
DeM 197
DeM 206
Year 3
Year 6
-
Year
Year 55
Year 55
pn-gt
pn-gt-iwy
p[t]H-mr-[]
mry-ra
ra-[]
ra-ms-sw
DeM 92
DeM 44
DeM 152
DeM 36
DeM 80
DeM 8
Year 27
Year 37
Year 53
Year 2
Hri
DeM 3
Year 6
Hri
DeM 5
Year 6
[...]
DeM 26
Year 42
Place
pA kAmw aA n pA qniw
Place
tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt nsw bit wsr-[]-ra[] (Ramses II)
mr-tm
pA kAmw tA Hwt nt HH rnpt nty m nA at []
tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt nsw bit wsr-mAat-rastp-n-ra (Ramses II)
tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt nsw bit wsr-mAat-rastp-n-ra (Ramses II)
Label
Year
Place
ra-ms-s
DeM 133
74
Overseer imy-r
Personal Name
[...]
Label
DeM 162
Year
-
Place
pr imn
Year
-
Place
pA kAmw aA n pA qniw
Year
Year 6
Place
m pr imn
Priest - Hm-nTr
Personal Name
imn
Year
Year 3
Place
-
Place
-
Label
DeM 202
Label
DeM 52
DeM 205
DeM 185
DeM 117
Year
Year 5
-
Place
at nt xt
xpSy
mn-mAat-ra (Seti I)
tA Hwt nb-mAat-ra m itr imnt (Amenhotep
III)
ptH
DeM 75
ra-ms-sw
ra-ms-[sw]-HH
DeM 165
DeM 114
HAti-Ay
Hrf
DeM 151
DeM 177
75
HqAy
[]-pA sA ptiAy
DeM 49
DeM 109
Year 19
-
Ten title variations are found in the Deir el-Medina material. One of these is the
combined title imy-r niwt TAty (Overseer of the City and Vizier). The dominant title on
the wine jar labels from Deir el-Medina is Vineyard Supervisor Hry kAmw. It occurs on 87
labels, 52 where the name has survived and 35 where it has not been preserved. The
extended title Vineyard Supervisor of the Great House (Hry kAmw pr aA) is found on two
labels, one of which with the name preserved. Twelve labels record the title Overseer of
the Estate (imy-r pr), with one having Overseer of the Place (imy-r st) and yet another
only Overseer (imy-r) without a name. The remaining titles Granary Supervisor (Hry
Snwt), Scribe of the Great House (sS n pr aA), Priest (Hm-nTr) and The Protector of the
[Temple] (pA nx [Hwt-nTr]) are all only found on single labels.
The title Hry baH is not found in this material, however the word baH does occur,
combined with a reference to a specific day, which can perhaps be taken as a reference to
the inundation (see chapter 4.2.3).
Three wine jar labels not only gives the officials name but also that of the father:
ipw sA Axy (Ipu son of Akhy, DeM 52), nDm sA Hwy (Nedjem son of Huy, DeM 194) and
[]-pA sA ptiAy ([]-pa son of Petiay, DeM 109). Unfortunately the latter label was
damaged in the area where the beginning of the officials name would have been written.
The expression m drt (in the hand of, ern et al 1993: 121, 7.3.17v ) is found in
this material (DeM 48, 49, 84, 110, 162, 175, 202) in a way similar to its use in the
Amarna labels. It is often combined with Hry kAmw (DeM 8, 10, 41, 81, 90, 103, 124,
128, 140, 144, 145, 156, 159, 160, 179, 182, 184, 192), confirming the theory that the
jars were labeled before they left the vineyard. This phrase appears to refer to the one
who wrote the text who would then have been the vineyard supervisor (Hry kAmw).
The designation r-xt (under the orders of: DeM 3, 5, 8, 26, 48, 80, 92, 164, cf.
ern et al 1993: 117, 7.3.10 ) only appears in the material from Deir el-Medina. From
the titles directly following this phrase it is associated with a superior official and it is
connected with a Hry kAmw only in two cases (DeM 8, 164). On one wine jar label the
phrase is followed by a reference to the Overseer of the Estate of Ramses (imy-r pr ra-mssw) who would have been a superior to the Vineyard Supervisor Nefer-[]-amun),
whose name is preceded by m drt (DeM 8). On the other labels this hierarchy was not
evident.
Haring (1997: 217-218) states that a person whose actions are designated m drt
was subordinate to the person whose authority is expressed with r-xt. The actions of the
76
temple sem-priest would be designated r-xt while that of the temple scribe would be
described as m drt. This could also be applied to the police (Haring 1997: 256). Haring
(1997: 285-287) also suggests that both groups of officials worked in extensive areas,
rather than being local. Thus the individual who acts r-xt had an overarching
responsibility for e.g. the fields, while the official who signed m drt with his title, such as
rwDw (agent, deputy, inspector) would have been a regular inspector of the work on the
fields, reporting to the higher level official, who used r-xt with his title and name (Katary
1989: 4-8, Haring 1997: 285-286). This would make the vineyard supervisor, whose
actions are described as m drt more directly involved in the supervision of the vineyard.
77
5 Summarizing discussion
5.1 Structure and content of the labels
This investigation has shown that the label texts follow a standard structure. The analytic
chapters in this study follow the pattern of information found on the labels. First came a
date written on the first line, followed by a designation of the product (irp or SdH),
classification, institution and / or a geographic location. In the second line a geographic
location (if not found on the first line) was placed, followed by the title and name of the
responsible producer, in some cases preceded by the name and title of the official to
whom the producer of the wine would have been accountable. Only in exceptional cases
was this pattern abandoned.
The minimum information found on the labels from these three groups of primary
sources, supplemented with material from Ramesseum and Malqata, consists of the date
and product, in some cases followed by a classification of the wine. The conclusion that
the Year date is of importance equal to the product name is based on its reoccurring
presence on the labels in all the material.
This pattern is found on the many shards comprising the three groups of primary
sources, as well as on the shards from the Ramesseum. The texts found on the shards of
the Malqata material were however abbreviated, generally reduced to the single word irp
(wine) that in some cases was expanded to include the classifications smA (blended), nfr
(good) och nfr nfr (very good) (Hayes 1951: fig. 8, nos 85, 86, 87, 88, 8918).
Classification is not however common, with the majority of labels indicating unclassified
wines. It is evident that the shards from Malqata provide the minimum level of obligatory
information.
An additional characteristic distinguished the Malqata material. The text was
sometimes written immediately next to or under the jar handle. This location, as well as
the abbreviated form of the texts, is not found for the labels from Amarna or Deir elMedina. However, two jars from Tutankhamuns tomb have seal imprints with the text
the rulers house on one of the jar handles (Tut 14, 23). This does not rule out the
possibility of text next to the handle on some shards from Amarna and Deir el-Medina,
since photographs have not been available.
The structural pattern of the texts is clear in the material from Tutankhamuns
tomb, where it is closely followed. The material from Amarna and Deir el-Medina have
18
No. 85, irp smA, is found on 13 labels; no. 86, irp nfr nfr hnw 6, on 1 label; no. 87. irp nfr nfr. on 1
label; no. 88, irp nfr, on 3 labels and and no. 89, irp, on 26 labels.
78
greater variation, with the scribe occasionally inserting additional information after the
first line had provided date, product and classification. For example, four wine jar labels
(Am 50, 51, 52, 53) from the Amarna material had the phrase aA m aHaw=f (The One who
is great in his lifetime), with Akhenatens name written immediately before the phrase in
the texts from three of them (Am 50, 51, 53). In the Deir el-Medina material, more
expansive texts are found after Ramses IIs succession, where the names of one or two
different institutions, are placed on line 2 or 3. For instance, the institution pr imn (Estate
of Amun) is often combined with another institution (DeM 5, 10, 12, 15, 21, 50, 60, 70,
147, 162, 193). In some cases it is written directly after the name of another institution, as
if the two were connected, and in other cases only pr imn is written. When there are
references to two institutions it may be that one is the intended destination of the wine.
It has been deduced that the text was written on the wine jar before it left the
vineyard. This can not be proven without doubt but there are strong indictions. First of
all, it is difficult to identify the contents of a sealed and unmarked jar after it has left its
source. It is logical that the label was written on the jar in connection with its sealing
before leaving the vineyard. Secondly, the quality of the wine could only be judged
before the jar was sealed. After sealing, the jar would have had to be broken for the wine
to be tasted and judged. This indicates that the wine jar labels, that could include a
quality classification, was written by someone who had the possibility to taste and judge
the wine before it was sent away.
5.2 Classification
The most common terms for classification are nfr (good) and nfr nfr (very good). The
word nDm (sweet) was also used to classify some wines and nfr nDm (good sweet)
provides another level of this classification. Furthermore, some singular wine jar labels
have the classification hAyt nfrt (merry-making or good going down, cf. discussion
above). There is also a kind of descriptive dating relating to a day (n hrw, of day X)
followed by a number. This is an unusual pattern that appears to have been in use mostly
during the reign of Ramses II. The position of the phrase, with the genitive n directly
after irp or irp + the quality classification nfr etc., indicates that it is an attribute of the
wine, perhaps an additional way of defining the quality according to the day the wine was
made.
Most of the classified wines from Amarna and Tutankhamuns tomb came from
institutions where the god Aton was included in the name. These institutions could be
79
located at different places throughout Egypt. The classified wines from Deir el-Medina
that had an institutional designation have more diversified sources.
Classification of the quality of the wine is infrequent in the material, with the
unclassified wine being by far the most common. Comparing the places of production of
the classified wine, it was not possible to determine if the better wines came from a
specific place. Rather, there is a wide distribution of the better wines among the
institution vineyards.
There is also the question of whether there is a proportional relationship between
the unclassified wine and that classified as nfr and nfr nfr, with the latter being the best of
a large production. There is nothing in the three groups of labels that explicitly supports
this assumption. The expected distribution is however found in the significantly larger
material from the Ramesseum: nfr nfr (27 examples = 1,2%), nfr (160 examples = 6,2% )
and unclassified (2461 examples = 92,6%). There were also 45 wines that had been
classified as nDm (sweet) (Spiegelberg 1898: Pl. XIX-XXXVA; Bouvier 1999-2001: Fasc.
I-IV).
The result from the Ramesseum material is most likely applicable to the
distribution of wine deliveries to Amarna and Deir el-Medina, even if this is not reflected
in the preserved material. However, the majority of the wine jar labels in these two
groups lack classifications thus supplying some support for this conclusion. The more
even distribution of nfr- and nfr nfr-wines is more difficult to explain.
While there is some consensus that irp was a wine made of grapes, it has been
more complicated to identify the fruit used to make the SdH-wine or even if it was a wine,
rather than vinegar as has been suggested (Tallet 1995: 460). Chemical analyses
(LC/MS/MS) of residue from a jar marked SdH has, however, clarified the question and
has unambiguously proven that it was a red grape wine (Guasch-Jan et al 2004: 1672;
2006a: 99-101). Furthermore, often classified as nfr nfr and described as sweet in one
love poem (P. Harris 500: Group B, nos. 12, e.g. Fox 1985: 21 with n. b; Mathieu 1996:
62), it was apparently a pleasant drink, which does not correspond to vinegar. It has now
been established that both irp and SdH wines were made from grapes.
The sources indicate that the production processes of the two wines may have
differed. SdH-wine may have been made of crushed grapes that were poured into a pot,
heated and then filtrated into a concentrate, a kind of grape syrup. This syrup was then
poured into already fermented wine so that a second fermentation was started. This would
have produced a wine that was both sweeter and higher in percentage of alcohol. This, it
has been concluded, was the production process of the sweet and intoxicating SdH-wine.
80
Questions of the quality and production of irp-wine have tended to be taken for
granted, without examination in any greater depth. Examples of questions that should be
examined are durability of the wine and if the inside of the wine jar was perhaps treated,
for example with resin, to prevent evaporation. There is significant disagreement among
scholars on this point and research has yet to provide an answer to these questions.
It was first 2006 that the question of whether white wine was made in Egypt
earlier then Greek period (332-30 B.C.) was answered. Chemical analyses using the
LC/MS/MS method of residue from wine jars from KV 62 have proven that white wine
was made as early as the 18th dynasty (1550-1295 B.C.; Guasch-Jan et al 2004: 1672,
2006b: 1077-1078).
There was a similar distribution of quality of irp-wine in the two groups of labels
from Amarna and Deir el-Medina. However, SdH-wine is not represented in the material
from Deir el-Medina while there are three SdH-labels in the Amarna material. It was noted
that, with the exception of the absence of SdH-wine, the wine delivered to Deir el-Medina
was similar to the standard of that delivered to the palace area in Amarna.
81
82
The banquet scenes show that wine was a highly appreciated drink among the
upper class. The wine jar labels found at the different workmens villages and the 46
wine jar labels from the military and police quarters in Amarna show that wine was also
enjoyed by these groups as well, possibly as a benefit or a gift from the king.
The evidence of the Deir el-Medina wine jar label (DeM 46) indicate that the king
could donate directly to the workers, and even to specific groups of workers. In addition,
the evidence of the tomb Kha shows that members of this community had access to wine
as funerary gifts. That reused wine jars probably would not have been suitable for reuse
because of the wine residue argues against seeing the quantity of wine jar labels as
indication of any other product than wine. This leads to the conclusion that the workers in
the village were allowed to drink wine.
83
different wine jars had been singled out and placed in the Burial Chamber as described
above. One wine jar shard was found outside in the corridor, next to the second entry into
the tomb. A final wine jar was found on the stairs below the first door of the tomb.
Finally, the original context of the shards from Deir el-Medina is unknown. They are
generally described as having been found in a rubbish heap. This makes it impossible to
draw any conclusions. This is especially problematic because the dating of this material
stretches over a long time and it would have been interesting to investigate if the
deposition of the shards in the trash heap indicated a stratigraphy that could have told
something about the sequence of dated wine jar labels and the time span of the use of
rubbish heap.
The Amarna labels stand out in the way the text standard, clearly shown on the
labels from Tutankhamuns tomb, is followed. This contrasts with the diversity of
information found in the material from Deir el-Medina appearing especially during the
reign of Ramses II when the texts become more fluid and several regions are mentioned
as in use for wine production. The texts in the three groups were expected to differ from
each other. Instead it was seen that the wine jar labels from Amarna and Deir el-Medina
were very similar, with the exception of those dating to the reign of Ramses II and after.
The texts from the wine jars found in Tutankhamuns tomb stood out as clearly
homogeneous and differing slightly from those from Amarna and Deir el-Medina.
The technological terms kAnw (vineyard) and baH (inundation, basin) have been
traced back to the Early Dynastic Period. The writing kAnw declined during Hyksos
period with the writing kAmw (vineyard) appearing that seems to refer to the Hyksos
kings enclosed vineyards. The word baH was in more frequent use from New Kingdom.
The word kAmw has the clear contextual meaning vineyard. The word baH, however,
was commonly used to mean flooding, basin or water channels and is therefore more
difficult to understand within the context of wine production. It has been suggested that
baH should be distinguished from kAmw, as representing a larger estate unit. No evidence
of this distinctinction has however been found, and no size differentiation has been
described in the texts.
The most common designation for institutions in the three sources groups is pr
(estate). The designation Hwt (temple/domain) occurs in different frequencies in the three
materials. In Tutankhamuns tomb there are no wine jar labels with the institution
designation Hwt, only pr being in use, in combination with either Atons or
Tutankhamuns name.
In the Amarna material the most common designation of an institution is pr and it
is often combined with the name of a god. In three smaller groups pr is combined with
84
the name of a king, a royal woman or the title of an official. In a very small group of 12
wine jar labels the institution designation is Hwt and three of them are combined with a
kings name. Also, in the Amarna material, there is a small group with the institution
designation tA Swt (Swt-chapel), not found in either Tutankhamuns tomb or Deir elMedina.
In the material from Deir el-Medina the institution designation Hwt was more
frequently used than in the other two groups and it was almost as common as pr. Hwt
occurs in combination with a kings name in the designation tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt (the
temple of millions years). On the other hand, Hwt is not found combined with the name of
a god. The institution designation pr, however, often appears in combination with either a
gods or a kings name. On a few wine jar labels it also occurs in combination with a
royal womans name. There were no titles or names of officials combined with the
institution designations.
During the Amarna period, wine production in general appears to occur in the
western Delta, with the majority of the wine jar labels referring to itr imnt (Western
River) as the source of the wine. The oases were also used for viniculture, although on a
smaller scale, during this period. The location TArw/TAl (Tjaru/Tjal) in the eastern Delta is
also found.
The Deir el-Medina material provides evidence for a spread of viticulture into
new areas. The occurrence of the names of river branches other than the Western River
(itr imnt) indicates an expansion of wine production in the Delta during 19th and 20th
dynasties. This may be related to the establishment of Pi-Ramses as the countrys
administrative center during the 19th dynasty. Places located near to Pi-Ramses are found
on the wine jar labels. These are pA nTr pA mw n pra (The God of the Water of Pre: DeM
12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 141) and spt ptr itr (Shore of the Ptr-river, DeM 30, 47, 76, 104).
Tallet (1995: 472) says that nAy ra-ms-s-mr-imn (The property of Ramses Beloved of
Amun) was a place also located close to Pi-Ramses and there are two wine jar labels
where this place is mentioned (DeM 30, 85).
In the Amarna material, the names of gods, combined with institution
designations, are more common than the names of kings. This material also has a
narrower and more limited variation in gods and kings names than is the case in the
material from Deir el-Medina that is far more diversified, covering a time period of 343
years. The wine jar labels from Amarna on the other hand have the more limited time
frame of about 20 years at the latter part of the 18th dynasty. One wine jar label stands
out, referring to Thutmosis I (1504-1492 B.C.), whose reign is dated about 150 years
before that of Akhenaten. Both groups of material follow the expected formula with
85
Amarna being limited in time and space and Deir el-Medina displaying a wider
distribution pattern.
In the material from Tutankhamuns tomb only the names of the god Aton (16
shards) and Tutankhamun (7 shards) appear on the wine jar labels. No other gods or royal
personages occur, other than Vizier Pentu (Tut 26) and those of wine producers.
There were differences in where the names of gods and kings are positioned
compared to the titles and names of officials. Royal and divine names are often found in
the first line and the titles and names of officials in the second or third line. This pattern
is clearly seen in all three groups of material. It is only when the first line is lost that an
official might occur on what appears to be the first line.
The title Hry kAmw (Vineyard Supervisor) is found in all three groups of material.
The title Hry baH (baH Supervisor) was only in use during Amarna period. The
reinstatement of the title Hry kAmw coincides with the ascent of Tutankhamun and the
reestablishment of Amun as the primary god.
This research has shown that these small, and seemingly insignificant, texts also have a
value, with a collective textual content that contributes information about wine
management. They demonstrate continuity in a standardized idiom that survived the
turmoil of the Amarna period. While the earlier texts from Amarna and Tutankhamuns
tomb do not reflect an ideology, the primarily Ramesside material from Deir el-Medina
sees a more intrusive inclusion of the name of the king, so that ideological intentions can
be identified even in wine production.
86
CATALOGUE
88
89
Am 1 (P1, Petrie 1894: Pl. XXII, hieroglyphic transcription from ern's notebook 17.54)
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 17 []
Year 17 []
[] 17
[] 17
i[r]p []
W[in]e []
The published text only contained the number for year 17 and ern only had transcribed this year in his
notebook. When the shard was examined at Petrie Museum, London the hieratic signs i and p in the word for
wine, i[r]p, were clearly shown. Somehow Griffith has choosed to not publish these signs in Petries publication
and ern has probably not seen the shard and therefore missed this information.
1)
2)
3)
1
HAt sp 16
Year 16
n pA inw []
90
HAt sp 15
Year 15
itr imnt
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 10
Year 10
irp n pr sHtp-ra
1)
2)
1
[] [x+7]
[] [x+7]
irp n pr wr-mA[w] []
1)
1
[] [n pr] nb-mAa[t]-ra []
91
1)
2)
1
[] [irp] n pr Ax-n-itn []
[] n [Hry] kAmwy []
[] of Vineyard [Supervisor] []
1)
2)
1
[] [n pr] xa m wAst n
1)
1
1)
2)
1
1)
1
92
1)
2)
3)
1
[]
[]
[] [irp] n pr ra qA m Axt []
[]
[]
1)
1
[] [HAt sp] 4
[] [Year] 4
1)
2)
1
[] 16
[] 16
1)
2)
1
[] [HAt] sp [17] []
[] [Yea]r [17] []
itr imnt
Western River
Hry [baH] []
[baH] Supervisor []
93
1)
1
1)
2)
1
[] [Sd]
[] [pond]
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
1)
2)
1
[] [ir]p n pr itn []
[] nn-Hr
[] Neneher
where in the text a change have been made, on the basis of the hieratic
1)
2)
3)
[] [itn] []
[] [Aton] []
m itr imnt n []
[]-A-rw []
[]-aru []
94
1)
2)
1
1)
2)
1
[]
[]
1)
2)
1
[] [ir]p pr itn a- []
where in the text a change have been made, on the basis of the
1)
2)
1
[] itn a-w-s n
[] Aton, LPH of
[] n itn aA aHa=f
95
1)
2)
1
[]
[]
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
ern has only transcribed line 2. The shard, now in the Petrie Museum in London, retained pale and illegible
traces of line 1.
1)
2)
1
[] i[tn] a-w- s
[] A[ton], LPH
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr itn
96
1)
2)
3)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
rwD Tw
Inspector Tju
1)
2)
1
1)
2)
1
itr []
the [] River
1)
1
[] itn m mn-nfr
[] Aton in Memphis
97
1)
2)
1
[HAt] sp 12
[Ye]ar 12
[] [tA]-iHw
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
HAt sp 10
Year 10
SdH []
Shedeh-wine []
1)
1
1)
2)
1
[] [irp]
[] [Wine] of
itr imnt n
ern seems to have some difficulties about which sign should be read after
however drawn the sign
expected but the hand style is careless, as is seen from the signs that follow. These signs have been read by
ern as
98
1)
2)
1
[]
[]
[] aA n baH
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
irp n pr ra-Hr-Axty n []
[itr imnt]
[Hry] []
[] Supervisor
1)
2)
1
[] [imnt]
[Western] []
99
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 8
Year 8
mn-nfr
Memphis
1)
2)
1
Hr whAt rsyt
HAt sp 12
Year 12
[]
[]
1)
2)
1
HAt sp 11
Year 11
irp n pr tky []
1)
2)
1
100
HAt sp 6
Year 6
irp n pr itn []
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
Hry kAm[w] []
Vineya[rd] Supervisor []
[] [HAt sp] 10
[] [Year] 10
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
Hry []
[] Supervisor []
HAt sp 17
Year 17
irp n pr nb-mAat-ra []
[] nb-mAat-ra a- w- s
[] Nebmaatre, LPH
HAt sp 13
Year 13
[] tiy [anx-ti] []
101
mD n pA itn a-w-s
HAt sp 12
Year 12
irp n pr Ax-n-itn a- w- s
aA m aHaw[=f] [n] []
[] itr imnt
[Hry kAmwy] []
[Vineyard Supervisor] []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
aA m aHaw=f n []
itr imnt
[] a- w- s
[] LPH
aA m aHaw[=f] []
[] Ax-n-[itn] a-w-s
[] Akhen[aton], LPH
aA m aHaw[=f] []
[] pr [Ax]-n-itn []
[] estate of [Akh]enaton []
[] [pr] [t]iy []
[] [estate] of [T]eye []
[] pA [Ax-n]-i[tn] []
[] the [Akhen]-a[ton] []
102
[] [irp] n pr nfr-nfrw-[iti]-itn []
[] pr nfr-nfrw-[iti]-itn n []
[] estate of Neferneferu-[iti]-aton of []
[] nfr-nfrw-iti-[i]t[n]
[] Neferneferu-iti-[a]to[n] []
HAt sp 13
Year 13
irp n pr nsw []
[] imntt
Western []
m Drt ra-[]
through Ra-[]
[] [HAt] sp 17
[] [Ye]ar 17
irp nsw
[] [p]A baH []
[] flooding []
[] Axt-itn n []
[] Akhetaten of []
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
HAt sp 14
Year 14
nsw []
king []
103
HAt sp 1
Year 1
itr imnt
HAt sp 1
Year 1
irp n pr anx-xprw-ra []
[] [HAt sp] 13
[] [Year] 13
[] [imnt]
[Western] []
[] [x+5]
[] [x+5]
[] [itr] imnt
[] Hry baH []
[] baH Supervisor []
104
[] irp nfr []
[] Good wine []
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
HAt sp 4
Year 4
irp n pr ra-Hr-Axty []
itr imnt
[] [Sd]H n pr ra-Hr-[Axty] []
[] ra-Hr-Axty []
[] Rehorakhty []
HAt sp 10
Year 10
HAt sp 12
Year 12
sS nsw Hwy-pn-xay
105
[] sAw nfr-rnpt
[] Guard Nefer-renpet
[] imnt
Western []
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
HAt sp 17
Year 17
n pA kAmw n sA wHAt
[] Hwt [pA] []
[] domain of the []
[] pA [itn] n
[] [Aton] of
[] [irp] n tA Hwt pA []
[] Axt-itn []
[] Akhetaten []
HAt sp 1
Year 1
irp n pr [itn] []
106
[] [it]n
[] [At]on
n itr imnt n
[] rw-fy
[] Ru-fy
[]
[]
HAt sp 1
Year 1
irp n pr i[t]n []
[] n-bA-[Hr]-ra
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
[] [n tA wHyt] []
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr i[t]n []
[HA]t sp 5
[Ye]ar 5
irp n pr []
[]
[]
107
HAt sp 6
Year 6
irp n pr itn []
[] [x+6]
[] [x+ 6]
irp n pr itn []
[] [x+6]
[] [x+6]
HAt sp 7
Year 7
irp n pr itn
[HA]t sp 7
[Ye]ar 7
irp n pr itn []
[HAt sp] 7
[Year] 7
108
[HA]t sp 8
[Ye]ar 8
irp n pr itn n
[] [i]tr imnt
[H]At sp 9
[Y]ear 9
HAt sp 9
Year 9
HAt sp 10
Year 10
[HA]t [sp] 10
[Yea]r 10
irp n pr itn []
HAt sp 12
Year 12
irp n pr i[t]n []
itr imnt
m D[rt] []
thr[ough] []
109
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp n pr itn []
itr imnt
n Hry baH mk
[] [x+4]
[] [x+4]
[] [pA Xnm]
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
HAt sp 16
Year 16
itr imnt
Hry [kAmw] []
[Vineyard] Supervisor []
HAt sp 16
Year 16
i[r]p []
W[i]ne []
[] [i]tr imnt
m Drt twy
through Tuy
[] n pr itn n []
[] itn n tA wHyt
110
[] [i]tn a-w-s n
[] [A]ton, LPH, of
[]-may
[]-may
[] [ir]p n pr [i]tn []
[] n pr itn
[] [Hai] m wAst
[] [rejoice] in Thebes
[] ipy
[] Ipy
[] [i]tn rmnyt []
[] domain of [A]ton []
[]
[]
[] n pr it[n] []
[] nxt-pA-itn
[] Nakhtpaaton
[] [it]n a- w- s n
[] [Ato]n, LPH, of
[] [i]rp n pr [itn] n
[itr] imnt
[]
[]
[] [i]tn
[] [A]ton
111
[] n
[] of
[] nb-imn
[] Nebamun
[] i[t]n n []
[] A[t]on of []
[] irp n pr anx-itn n
itr []
the [] River []
[] imn-m-ipt n pr []
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
irp n pr anx-itn []
[] [itr] imnt
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
HAt sp 7
Year 7
itr imnt
112
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr anx-i[t]n n
sqb []
the Cooling []
Hry kAm[w] []
Vineya[rd] Supervisor []
[] [x+9]
[] [x+9]
irp n pr anx-itn n
[] [i]tr imnt
[] [anx]-itn n
[] sn-nfr
[] Sennefer
HAt sp 10
Year 10
itr imnt
[] [HA]t sp 10
[] [Ye]ar 10
[] [itr imnt]
[Hry kAmw] []
[Vineyard Supervisor] []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp n pr anx-ra n
itr imnt
113
HAt sp 7
Year 7
irp n pr anx-itn []
[] anx-itn n
tA wAt imnt []
[] pr anx-itn
[] [itr imnt] []
[] [ir]p n pr anx-i[t]n []
[] [i]r[p] n [anx]-itn
HAt sp 8
Year 8
irp n tA [Swt] []
114
[] itr imnt
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
HA[t] sp 9
Ye[ar] 9
irp n tA Swt
HAt sp 1 Abd 1
irp n pr sHtp-itn
itr imnt
m drt pA-Hw
through Pahu
[] [ir]p n pr sHtp-itn []
[] [itr] imnt
m drt pA-[Hw]
through Pa[hu]
[] pA-Hw
[] Pahu
115
[] [HAt sp] 13
[] [Year] 13
HAt sp 12
Year 12
irp n pr wr-mAw []
HAt sp 12
Year 12
irp n pr wr-mAw n
itr imnt
[] [pr] wr-mAw n
[] iw-m-Hsti
[] Iuemheseti
[] pr wr-mAw n []
[] iw-m-Hsti []
[] Iuemheseti []
[] [HA]t sp 1
[] [Ye]ar 1
irp n pr imy-r []
116
[] [x+ 6]
[] [x+6]
[] [Hry] baH iy
[] baH [Supervisor] Iy
[] [HAt sp] 13
[] [Year] 13
irp n TArw n
Wine of Tjaru of
sS nsw hwy-pn-xay
[] wHAt rsyt []
[] Southern oasis []
[] hnw 32 []
[] 32 hnw-measures []
[] (toponymn?) []
[] (toponymn?) []
[]
[]
[] wHAt rsyt []
[] Southern oasis []
HAt sp [10+x] []
Year [10+x] []
HAt sp 8
Year 8
i[r]p []
W[i]ne []
mn-nfr []
Memphis []
[] imnt
Western []
tA st sS nsw iaH-ms []
117
[] mHty iAbty
[] Northeastern
tA st pA dmi pA itn []
[] [n]a mHty []
[] hnw []
[] hnw-measure []
[] na mHty
35 []
35 []
irp n miS
Wine of Mish
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp []
Wine []
pA Xnm []
the floodplain []
HAt sp 13
Year 13
irp []
Wine []
pA itn m Axt-[itn] []
Aton in Akhet[aten] []
mD n pA []
HAt [sp] 9
Ye[ar] 9
irp [n] []
Wine of []
/10 for []
mD n pA itn a-w-s
[] Viney[ard][Supervisor] [Ipi] []
118
irp n pA mD n imy-r []
[] [i]tn n
[] [A]ton of
[] pwy
[] Puy
HAt sp 1
Year 1
irp n
Wine of
itr imnt n
Hry []
[] Supervisor []
HAt sp 6
Year 6
irp n
Wine of
itr []
[] River
pr imn [m wAst]
Hry []
[] Supervisor []
HAt [sp] 14
Ye[ar] 14
irp n
Wine of
itr imnt []
[] Hr wp-tA
[] from Upta
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp n
Wine of
itr []
[] River
mt-kA-[aSi] []
Meteka-[ashi] []
119
HAt sp 17
Year 17
irp n
Wine of
[itr] imnt
[] [i]rp n
[] [W]ine of
itr imnt
[] [ir]p n
[] [Wi]ne of
i[tr] []
[] Ri[ver]
[] itn n
[] Aton of
itr []
[] River
[] hAti-Ay
[] Hatiay
[] [i]r[p] [] n
[] [W]i[ne] [] of
pA kAmw
the vineyard
[] [i]tr imnt []
[] Western [Ri]ver []
[]
[]
[] imnt n kAmw []
120
[] imnt n
Western [] of
[]
[]
[]
[]
[] n [pA] []
[] of [the] []
[] [it]n []
[] [At]on []
[] [HAt sp] 11
[] [Year] 11
[ir]p []
[Wi]ne []
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
Hry sn-nfr
Supervisor Sen-nefer
[] [irp] n pA baH []
[] iny
[] Iny
121
Am 185 (F157, Fairman and ern 1951: Pl. XC; not wine according to Fairman)
1
[] n pA Sd[H] [n]
[] of the Shed[eh]-wine of
nA n baH []
the baHs []
[] [itr] []
[] [River] []
hnw 24
24 hnw-measures
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp pA baH []
HAt sp 13
Year 13
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp nfr pr []
[] [itr] imnt
[] Western [River]
aA n [baH] []
HAt sp 15
Year 15
irp []
Wine []
itr imnt
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
[] 16
[] 16
irp n pr []
122
HAt sp 16
Year 16
irp [n pr] []
[]
[]
HAt sp 2
Year 2
irp nDm n
Sweet wine of
itr n baH []
pA itn
of Aton
[] [x+6]
[] [x+6]
irp nDm n pr []
HAt sp 16
Year 16
irp [nDm] []
[Sweet] Wine []
qAyt
Karet (?)
Hry baH []
baH Supervisor []
HAt sp 28 []
Year 28 []
ir[p] []
Wi[ne] []
123
HAt sp 9
Year 9
i[r]p []
W[i]ne []
sS nb-mHy-[]
Scribe Neb-mehy-[]
[] irp
[] Wine
[] [itn] a-w-s n []
[] [Aton], LPH, of []
aSA m Hb-[sd]
[] itn hAti-Ay []
[] Aton, Hatiay []
[] [i]tn a-w-s
[] [A]ton, LPH
HAt sp 17
Year 17
[] nfr-rnpt
[] Nefer-renpet
HA[t] sp []
Ye[a]r []
124
HAt sp 11
Year 11
SdH [] anx-i[tn] n
[] marshes of Akhet-ankh-Ato[n] []
[] [of] Akhet-ankh-Aton []
HAt sp 9
Year 9
itr []
[] River
pr itn tH n
Am 207 (F304 + , ern notbook 17.54: 10; 1951: Pl. XCVI (omitted by Fairman)
1
HAt sp 14
Year 14
iArrt iw [] n pr wr-mAw m pA
Xnm
floodplain
tA wAt iAbt n mr
tiAy pr-Hbyt
of Behbeit el-Hagar
[] itn xA tpy []
125
****
Am 210 (176, 1951: Pl. XCI)
Not wine but Fairman says certainly wine.
aAm-beer.
***
Am 211 (177, 1951: Pl. XCI)
Not wine but Fairman says certainly wine.
arm a kind of alcoholic drink (Hannig 1995: 150).
***
Am 212 (279, 1951: Pl. XCV)
Not wine but Fairman says wine.
Honey.
***
Am 213 (324, 1951: Pl. XCVII)
Not wine and Fairman is also uncertain if it is wine.
126
Tut 1 (ern 1965: 21, No. 1; Carter No: 413; Cairo JE 62306)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
itr imnty
Tut 2 (ern 1965: 21, No. 2; Carter No: 486; Cairo JE 62303)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
irp n pr itn a- w- s n
itr imnty
Hry kAmw nn
Tut 3 (ern 1965: 21, No. 3; Carter No: 362; Cairo JE 62324)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
[itr] imnty
Hry kAmw nn
Tut 4 (ern 1965: 21, No. 4; Carter No: 568; Cairo JE 62318)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
itr imnty n
Tut 5 (ern 1965: 21, No. 5; Carter No: 392; Cairo JE 62305)
1
HAt sp 4
Year 4
itr n
the river of
127
Tut 6 (ern 1965: 21, No. 6; Carter No: 434; Cairo JE 62304)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr itn n
itr imnty
Tut 7 (ern 1965: 21, No. 7; Carter No: 523; Cairo JE 62301)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr itn n
itr imnty
Tut 8 (ern 1965: 22, No. 8; Carter No: 411; Cairo JE 62309)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
TArw
Tjaru
Tut 9 (ern 1965: 22, No. 9; Carter No: 549; Cairo JE 62322)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr itn n
itr imnty
Tut 10 (ern 1965: 22, No. 10; Carter No: 509; Cairo JE 62312)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
itr imnty
128
Tut 11 (ern 1965: 22, No. 11; Carter No: 489; Cairo JE 62317)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr itn n
itr n
the river of
Tut 12 (ern 1965: 22, No. 12; Carter No: 571; Cairo JE 62307)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
qArt
qArt
Tut 13 (ern 1965:22, No. 13; Carter No: 206; Cairo JE 62315)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
itr imntty
Hry kAmy rr
Tut 14 (ern 1965:22, No. 14; Carter No: 180; Cairo JE 62316)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr twt-anx-imn-HqA-iwnw-Smaw
m itr imnty
Tut 15 (ern 1965:23, No. 15; Carter No: 560; Cairo JE 62308)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
m itr imnty
129
Tut 16 (ern 1965:23, No. 16; Carter No: 508; Cairo JE 62313)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n pr twt-anx-imn-HqA-iwnw-Smaw
[a-w-s]
itr imnty n
Tut 17 (ern 1965:23, No. 17; Carter No: 570: Cairo JE 62323)
1
HAt sp 5
Year 5
a-w-s
m itr imnty
Tut 18 (ern 1965: 23, No. 18; Carter No: missing; Cairo JE 62321)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
m itr
Tut 19 (ern 1965: 23, No. 19; Carter No: 516; Cairo JE 62320)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr twt-anx-imn-HqA-iwnw-Smaw
a-w-s
m itr imntty
Tut 20 (ern 1965: 23, No. 20; Carter No: 539; Cairo JE 62311)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr itn n
itr imnty
130
Tut 21 (ern 1965: 23, N.o 21; Carter No: 11; Cairo JE missing)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr itn
Tut 22 (ern 1965: 24, No. 22; Carter No 195; Cairo JE 62314)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr itn n
itr imnty
Tut 23 (ern 1965: 24, No. 23; Carter No: 541; Cairo JE 62310)
1
HAt sp 9
Year 9
irp n pr twt-anx-imn-HqA-iwnw-Smaw
a- w-s
m itr imntty
Tut 24 (ern 1965: 24, No. 24; Carter No: 500; Cairo JE 62300)
1
HAt sp 10
Year 10
Tut 25 (ern 1965: 24, No. 25; Carter No: 563; Cairo JE 62319)
1
HAt sp 31
Year 31
Tut 26 (ern 1965: 24, No. 26; Carter No: 490; Cairo JE 62302)
1
TAty pntw
131
HAt sp 1
Year 1
irp n kA n km[t]
Wine of Ka of Egypt
HAt sp 11
Year 11
irp n
Wine of
itr imnt []
HAt sp 6
Year 6
a- w- s mr wAst
n tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt
[]
from []
HAt sp 3
Year 3
irp n pr xnsw n
itr imnt
132
HAt sp 6
Year 6
mAat-ra]-stp-n-ra mr wAst
nty []
that is in []
n tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt
m pr imn
m Drt imy-r st []
HAt sp 13
Year 13
irp n pr Dsr-xprw-ra-[]--[n]-[]
m itr imnt
HAt sp 4
Year 4
HAt sp 2
Year 2
irp n hrw 3
Wine of day 3
nty m nA at []
133
HAt sp 26
Year 26
irp n pA kAmw n
m pr imn []
in Amuns estate []
HAt sp 3
Year 3
irp n pr Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n-ra a- w- s
sHtp imn
HAt sp 17
Year 17
stp-n-ra a- w- s m pr imn
nty m pr wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra
a- w- s pA nTr pA mw n pra
[] [nTr] m pA mw n p-[]
134
[] [x+8]
[] [x+8]
wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra [a- w- s]
of Usermaatre-Setepenre, [LPH]
HAt sp 24
Year 24
HAt sp 19
Year 19
wsr-[]-ra-[] kA n kmt
User-[]-re-[] Ka of Egypt
[] [irp] n
[] [Wine] of
[] pA mw n pra
[] water of Pre
[] aA n tA Hwt wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra
a- w-s m pr imn
[] m pA mw n pra
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
135
HAt sp 23
Year 23
[] imntty itr kA n []
[] [x+7]
[] [x+7]
HAt sp 42
Year 42
irp n pA kA[mw] []
r-xt imy-r pr []
HAt sp 7
Year 7
irp n TA[rw] []
Wine of Tja[ru] []
136
[] n pr ra
[] of the estate of Re
HAt sp 8 hnw 2
Year 8, 2 hnw-measures
irp n TA[rw]
Wine of Tjaru
pA imy-r pr n imn
[HAt sp] 8
[Year] 8
irp n mr-tm []
Wine of Meidum []
[]
HAt sp 10
Year 10
irp n mr-tm []
Wine of Meidum []
irp n mr-tm []
Wine of Meidum []
137
[] irp n tA Hwt
[] m mr-tm []
[] from Meidum []
HAt sp 53
Year 53
irp n mr-tm []
Wine of Meidum
imy-r pr mry-ra
[] mr-tmw []
[] Meidum []
[] [n hrw] 3 n tA Hwt
of Usermaatre-Setepenre, [life] []
[] [itr aA]
irp n pA Hb-sd
[]
138
HAt sp 28
Year 28
[] nty mr qAyt []
[] that is mr qAyt
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
[] imy-r pr pn-gt-iwy
m Drt [Hry] []
through [] Supervisor []
[] [ir]p n pr pn m pA mw n ptH
HAt sp 53
Year 53
[] [ra-ms-sw-mr-imn] []
[] [Ramses-Meryamun] []
[] [irp] n pA kAmw n
m Drt Hry []
through [] Supervisor []
139
[] n pA kAmw aA n pA qniw?
m Drt []
through []
HAt sp 19
Year 19
ptH
Ptah
m Drt HqAy
through Hekay
[] [HH] rnpt
[] [Millions] of Years
Hr itr imntt
HAt sp 5 at nt xt
ipw sA Axy
HAt sp 17 at [xt] []
[] pr imn-htp []
140
[] [i]rp n pr Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n-ra []
[] [Hry] []
[] [Supervisor] []
[] [irp] n pr Dsr-xprw-ra-[stp]-n-[ra]
[] [imnt]
[Western] []
Hry kAmy ra
Vineyard Supervisor Re
[] n pr Dsr-xprw-ra-stp-n-ra a- w-s
[] [Hry kAmyt] bA
[] [Vineyard] [Supervisor] Ba
[HAt sp 14]
[Year 14]
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
a- w- s m []
from []
[] [i]mn a-w- s
[] [A]mun, LPH
Hr spt itr aA
[Hry] []
[] [Supervisor] []
[] [x+8]
[] [x+8]
141
n tA Hwt nt HH m rnpt n []
[]-[stp]-n-ra a-w-s
[]-[Setep]enre, LPH
m pr imn
in Amun's estate
[] [HAt] sp 4
[] [Ye]ar 4
irp n pr mn-[mAat]-ra-[]
ra-ms-sw-[]
Ramses-[]
[] ra-ms-sw-mr-imn a-w-s
[] Ramses-Meryamun, LPH
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
[] [Year 32]
[irp n pA] []
[Wine of the] []
[] [mr] wAst
142
HAt sp 36
Year 36
irp n pr imn-[htp] []
itr imntt
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
[Hry] []
[Supervisor] []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
pr nb-mAat-ra a-w-s
n pr itn tH []
[] [n tA Hwt nb-mAat-ra] []
[] [a-w-s] n pr itn tH
i[rp] []
W[ine] []
m pr imn
in Amun's estate
m itr imnt []
m pr imn []
in Amun's estate []
143
[] [ir]p n tA st mHtt
HAt sp 22
Year 22
q[A]b Swt
[] Hmt nsw a- w- s
[] [Hry kAmw] pr aA HH
a-[w-s]
[] [pt]H []
[] [Pt]ah []
HAt sp 29
Year 29
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
144
HAt sp 41
Year 41
[irp] []
[Wine] []
m nAy imn m []
HAt sp 40
Year 40
[] [nAy] imn
[] [these] of Amun
[] r-xt imy-r pr ra []
HAt sp 31
Year 31
n Hm-nTr tpy n []
ra-ms-sw-mr-[imn] []
Ramses-Mer[amun] []
HAt sp 22
Year 22
[] [m] pr imn
nty m xr [wAs]t m []
[] aA n wsr-maAt-ra-stp-n-ra []
Great [] of Usermaatre-Setepenre []
[] ra-ms-sw
[] Ramses
nty Hr []
that is on []
145
HAt sp 6
Year 6
m pr imn
in Amun's estate
[LPH], [Bak]-[]
[] [x+3]
irp []
Wine []
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
[] [k]mt
[] [Eg]ypt
Hry kAmwy []
Vineyard Supervisor []
HAt sp []
Year []
irp n pA []
Wine of the []
146
[] [i]rp n nA kAmw
n pr ra-ms-[]
HAt sp 12
Year 12
irp []
Wine []
m pr imn-ra []
HAt sp 27
Year 27
irp []
Wine []
[] n pA kAmw aA n ra-ms-s-[]
HAt sp 55
Year 55
irp []
Wine []
imy-r pr pA-ra []
[HAt sp] []
[Year] []
[] [Hry] kAmwy []
[] Vineyard [Supervisor] []
HAt sp 10
Year 10
irp n TArw
Wine of Tjaru
147
[] [HAt sp] 29
[] [Year] 29
irp n pA kA[mw] []
Wine of vine[yard] []
[] [HAt sp] []
[] [Year] []
irp itr aA []
HAt sp 12
Year 12
Hry kAmy []
Vineyard Supervisor []
m nAy imn
m Drt [Hry] []
through [] Supervisor
[] [HAt] sp 3
[] [Ye]ar 3
irp n pr nb-mAat-ra-[mr]-imn
[] [kAmw] try
[] [Vineyard] [] Tery
148
[] kAmw n ra-ms-[]
[] vineyard of Ramses-[]
[] [a]-w-s
[] [L]PH
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
[] [x+2]
[] [kAmw] aA n ra-[]
[]-pA sA pti-Ay
m Drt stXy []
through Sety []
HAt sp 2
Year 2
149
[] [bit] ra-ms-[]
[] [x+3]
[] [x+3]
irp n tA []
Wine of the []
[] [imy-r] pr ihAy []
mr-n-ptH-htp-Hr-mAat a- w- s []
Merenptah-Hotep-her-maat, LPH []
[] ra-ms-[sw]-HH
[] Ramses-heh
[] [Year] 6
[] [i]rp n pA kA[mw]
[] mr wAst
nty Hr im[nt] []
m itr im[nt] []
[] [pA]-Hry-pDt
[] Paherypedjet
150
[] [ra]-ms-sw-mr-imn a- w- s [mr] []
[] [HAt] sp 55
[] [Ye]ar 55
[] ra-ms-sw-mr-i[mn] []
[] Ramses-Merya[mun] []
[] [x+7]
[] [x+7]
irp []
Wine []
[] n nA kAmw TA[rw] []
151
[] [Hr]y kAmyt []
[] Vineyard [Super]visor []
HAt sp 7
Year 7
irp []
Wine []
m pA mw n imn
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
[] iwnw
[] Heliopolis
HAt sp 3
Year 3
irp n pr sty-mr-[n]-ptH []
Hry kAmwy []
Vineyard Supervisor []
[] [k]Am[w] aA n ra-ms-sw-mr-imn []
[...] sA pti-Ay
[] son of Petiay
[]
[]
[] imntt
Western []
imy-r st ra-ms-s
152
[] [HAt] sp 8
[] [Ye]ar 8
[] mn-mAat-ra []
[] Menmaatre []
[]-mAat a- w- s
[]-maat, LPH
hr ib m []
content in []
-mr-imn [a] []
Usermaatre-Meryamun, [L] []
[] [Hr]y kAm[w] []
[] Vineyar[d] [Super]visor []
[]
[]
[] [pr] imn
[] Amun's [estate]
nty m xr
[]
[]
153
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n hrw []
Wine of day []
nty m mw n pra-[]
HAt sp 37 []
Year 37 []
HAt sp 39
Year 39
irp n p[A] []
Wine of th[e] []
HAt sp 65
Year 65
m Drt Hry []
through [] Supervisor []
[] n pA kA[mw] []
[] of the vineya[rd] []
HAt sp 5
Year 5
irp n []
Wine of []
154
HAt sp 2
Year 2
irp []
Wine []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp n []
Wine of []
m itr imntt []
[] HAti-Ay []
[] Hati-ay []
HAt sp 37
Year 37
irp n []
Wine of []
[] imy-r pr p[t]H-mr-[]
HAt sp 32
Year 32
irp n pA []
Wine of the []
nty m []
that is in []
HAt sp 36
Year 36
irp n pA []
Wine of the []
[] [kAmw] []
[] [Vineyard] []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp []
Wine []
m itr imntt
[Hry] kAm[w] []
Vine[yard] [Supervisor] []
155
[] [HAt sp 34]
[] [Year 34]
[ir]p []
[Wi]ne []
[] HA[t] sp []
[] Ye[a]r []
nty Hr imntt []
HAt sp 13
Year 13
irp n []
Wine of []
[]
[]
HAt sp 21
Year 21
irp n tA []
Wine of the []
HAt sp 46
Year 46
irp n pr []
[] [pr] mn-mAat-ra []
[] imnt
Western []
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
a-w-s m pr imn
m Drt imy-r []
156
[] [HA]t sp 34
[] [Ye]ar 34
irp n []
Wine of []
[] [HAt sp] 9
[] [Year] 9
irp []
Wine []
[] irp n pA kA[mw] []
nty []
that is []
ra-ms-sw-[]
Ramses-[]
[] [HA]t sp 17
[] [Ye]ar 17
irp n pA kAmw []
[] [wsr-mAat-ra]-stp-[n]-ra a- w-[s] []
[] [Usermaatre]-Setepenre, LP[H] []
HAt sp []
Year []
m pr i[m]n []
in A[m]un's estate []
[] [HAt sp] 7
[] [Year] 7
irp n pA []
Wine of the []
[] [Hw]t pA nx []
157
[] irp n pr []
HAt sp 2
Year 2
irp n pr []
m itr imntt
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
[] irp n hrw 5 n []
[] Wine of day 5 of []
HAt sp 14
Year 14
irp n pr []
m itr imntt
Hry kA[mw] []
Vine[yard] Supervisor []
[] irp n pA []
[] Wine of the []
[] m Drt m []
[] through from []
[] hr ib m iAbt (?)
[]
[]
158
a- w s m []
LPH, from []
[] Hr-f
[] Heref
[] n pA []
[] of the []
[] pA kAmw n tA Hwt nt []
[]-ms-sw-mr-imn a-w-[s] []
[] [ i]rp n pr ra-[]
[] n kAmw n ra-ms-sw-mr-imn []
HAt sp 11
Year 11
irp TA[rw] []
Wine of Tjaru []
wsr-mAat-ra-mr-imn a- []
[] m itr imntt
159
[] pA-mHdw
[] Pamehdu
HAt sp 23
Year 23
nty m iwnw []
that is in Heliopolis
[] m Drt [Hry] []
[] through [] [Supervisor] []
[] n tA Hwt wsr-mAat-ra-stp-n-ra
a-w-[s] []
LP[H] []
[] sti-mr-n-ptH m pr imn
nty m []
that is from []
ra []
Setep[en]re []
HAt sp 37
Year 37
160
hAt sp 4
Year 4
mHty m Hr Snwt
[]-sw-mr-imn a-w-s []
[]-es-Meryamun, LPH []
HAt sp 3
Year 3
Hry kAmw []
Vineyard Supervisor []
inyt kA-sA
HAt sp 2
Year 2
161
[] irp n tA Hwt
nsw ra-[]
King Ra-[]
[] m pr
nty Hr mHty
Granary Supervis[or](?) []
HAt sp 6
Year 6
irp n pr imn-ra []
[]-ms-swt
[]-mesut
irp n pr ra-[]
kAmw []
Grape harvest []
HAt sp 3
Year 3
irp []
Wine []
162
HAt sp 4
Year 4
i[r]p []
W[i]ne []
Hr spt [itr] kA []
[] irp n xpSy n []
[] pA-[]
[] Pa-[]
nty []
that is []
HA[t] sp []
Ye[ar] []
m itr imnt []
[] wAst [] ra-ms-sw
[] Thebes [] Ramses
163
Bibliografi
ern, J.
1938-39
W. M. F. (Ed.).
1938-39
Fairman, H.W.
1951
Hieratic inscriptions. The City of Akhenaten Part III The Central City
and Official Quaters. Pendlebury, J. D. S. (Ed.). Vol. 1-2. London:
Egypt Exploration Society.
Griffith, F.Ll.
1894
Koenig, Y.
1980
164
165
Concordance
Fairman 1951
Griffith 1894
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
P21
P22
P23
P24
P25
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
P31
P63
P64
P65
P89
P90
P91
P92
P93
P94
P95
P96
D203 unpublished ern
notebook 17.54, p 29
Am 1
Am 2
Am 3
Am 4
Am 5
Am 6
Am 7
Am 8
Am9
Am 10
Am 11
Am 12
Am 13
Am 14
Am 15
Am 16
Am 17
Am 18
Am 19
Am 20
Am 21
Am 22
Am 23
Am 24
Am 25
Am 26
Am 27
Am 28
Am 29
Am 30
Am 31
Am 32
Am 33
Am 34
Am 35
Am 36
Am 37
Am 38
Am 39
Am 40
Am 41
Am 42
Am 43
F16
F17
F18
F19
F20
F21
F22
F23
F24
F25
F26
F27
F28
F29
F30
F31
F32
F33
F34
F35
F36
F37
F38
F39
F40
F41
F42
F43
F44
F45
F46
F47
F48
F49
F50
F51
F52
F53
F54
F55
F56
F57
F58
F59
F60
F61
F62
Am 44
Am 45
Am 46
Am 47
Am 48
Am 49
Am 50
Am 51
Am 52
Am 53
Am 54
Am 55
Am 56
Am 57
Am 58
Am 59
Am 60
Am 61
Am 62
Am 63
Am 64
Am 65
Am 66
Am 67
Am 68
Am 69
Am 70
Am 71
Am 72
Am 73
Am 74
Am 75
Am 76
Am 77
Am 78
Am 79
Am 80
Am 81
Am 82
Am 83
Am 84
Am 85
Am 86
Am 87
Am 88
Am 89
Am 90
166
F63
F64
F65
F66
F67
F68
F69
F70
F71
F72
F73
F74
F75
F76
F77
F78
F79
F80
F81
F82
F83
F84
F85
F86
F87
F88
F89
F90
F91
F92
F93
F94
F95
F96
F97
F98
F99
F100
F101
F102
F103
F104
F105
F106
F107
F108
F109
F110
F111
Am 91
Am 92
Am 93
Am 94
Am 95
Am 96
Am 97
Am 98
Am 99
Am 100
Am 101
Am 102
Am 103
Am 104
Am 105
Am 106
Am 107
Am 108
Am 109
Am 110
Am 111
Am 112
Am 113
Am 114
Am 115
Am 116
Am 117
Am 118
Am 119
Am 120
Am 121
Am 122
Am 123
Am 124
Am 125
Am 126
Am 127
Am 128
Am 129
Am 130
Am 131
Am 132
Am 133
Am 134
Am 135
Am 136
Am 137
Am 138
Am 139
F112
F113
F114
F115
F116
F117
F118
F119
F120
F121
F122
F123
F124
F125
F126
F127
F128
F129
F130
F131
F132
F133
F134
F135
F136
F137
F138
F139
F140
F141
F142
F143
F144
F145
F146
F147
F148
F149
F150
F151
F152
F153
F154
F155
F156
F157
F158
F159
F160
Am 140
Am 141
Am 142
Am 143
Am 144
Am 145
Am 146
Am 147
Am 148
Am 149
Am 150
Am 151
Am 152
Am 153
Am 154
Am 155
Am 156
Am 157
Am 158
Am 159
Am 160
Am 161
Am 162
Am 163
Am 164
Am 165
Am 166
Am 167
Am 168
Am 169
Am 170
Am 171
Am 172
Am 173
Am 174
Am 175
Am 176
Am 177
Am 178
Am 179
Am 180
Am 181
Am 182
Am 183
Am 184
Am 185
Am 186
Am 187
Am 188
167
F161
F162
F163
F164
F165
F166
F167
F168
F169
F170
F171
F172
F173
F174
F175
F178
F190
F237
F304
F308
F322
Am 189
Am 190
Am 191
Am 192
Am 193
Am 194
Am 195
Am 196
Am 197
Am 198
Am 199
Am 200
Am 201
Am 202
Am 203
Am 204
Am 205
Am 206
Am 207
Am 208
Am 209
ern 1965
ern 1; Carter No: 413;
Cairo JE 62306
ern 2; Carter No: 486;
Cairo JE 62303
ern 3; Carter No: 362;
Cairo JE 62324
ern 4; Carter No: 568;
Cairo JE 62318
ern 5; Carter No: 392;
Cairo JE 62305
ern 6; Carter No: 434;
Cairo JE 62304
ern 7; Carter No: 523;
Cairo JE 62301
ern 8; Carter No: 411;
Cairo JE 62309
ern 9; Carter No: 549;
Cairo JE 62322
ern 10; Carter No: 509;
Cairo JE 62312
ern 11; Carter No: 489;
Cairo JE 62317
ern 12; Carter No: 571;
Cairo JE 62307
ern 13; Carter No: 206;
Cairo JE 62315
Tut 1
Tut 2
Tut 3
Tut 4
Tut 5
Tut 6
Tut 7
Tut 8
Tut 9
Tut 10
Tut 11
Tut 12
Tut 13
Tut 14
Tut 15
Tut 16
Tut 17
Tut 18
Tut 19
Tut 20
Tut 21
Tut 22
Tut 23
Tut 24
Tut 25
Tut 26
Koenig 1980
6289
6290
6291
6292
6293
6294
6295
6296
6297
6298
6299
6300
6301
6302
6303
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
DeM 1
DeM 2
DeM 3
DeM 4
DeM 5
DeM 6
DeM 7
DeM 8
DeM 9
DeM 10
DeM 11
DeM 12
DeM 13
DeM 14
DeM 15
DeM 16
DeM 17
DeM 18
DeM 19
DeM 20
DeM 21
168
6310
6311
6312
6313
6314
6315
6316
6317
6318
6319
6320
6321
6322
6323
6324
6325
6326
6327
6328
6329
6330
6331
6332
6333
6334
6335
6336
6337
6338
6339
6340
6341
6342
6343
6344
6345
6346
6347
6348
6349
6350
6351
6352
6353
6354
6355
6356
6357
6358
DeM 22
DeM 23
DeM 24
DeM 25
DeM 26
DeM 27
DeM 28
DeM 29
DeM 30
DeM 31
DeM 32
DeM 33
DeM 34
DeM 35
DeM 36
DeM 37
DeM 38
DeM 39
DeM 40
DeM 41
DeM 42
DeM 43
DeM 44
DeM 45
DeM 46
DeM 47
DeM 48
DeM 49
DeM 50
DeM 51
DeM 52
DeM 53
DeM 54
DeM 55
DeM 56
DeM 57
DeM 58
DeM 59
DeM 60
DeM 61
DeM 62
DeM 63
DeM 64
DeM 65
DeM 66
DeM 67
DeM 68
DeM 69
DeM 70
6359
6360
6361
6362
6363
6364
6365
6366
6367
6368
6369
6370
6371
6372
6373
6374
6375
6376
6377
6378
6379
6380
6381
6382
6383
6384
6385
6386
6387
6388
6389
6390
6391
6392
6393
6394
6395
6396
6397
6398
6399
6400
6401
6402
6403
6404
6405
6406
6407
DeM 71
DeM 72
DeM 73
DeM 74
DeM 75
DeM 76
DeM 77
DeM 78
DeM 79
DeM 80
DeM 81
DeM 82
DeM 83
DeM 84
DeM 85
DeM 86
DeM 87
DeM 88
DeM 89
DeM 90
DeM 91
DeM 92
DeM 93
DeM 94
DeM 95
DeM 96
DeM 97
DeM 98
DeM 99
DeM 100
DeM 101
DeM 102
DeM 103
DeM 104
DeM 105
DeM 106
DeM 107
DeM 108
DeM 109
DeM 110
DeM 111
DeM 112
DeM 113
DeM 114
DeM 115
DeM 116
DeM 117
DeM 118
DeM 119
169
6408
6409
6410
6411
6412
6413
6414
6415
6416
6417
6418
6419
6420
6421
6422
6423
6424
6425
6426
6427
6428
6429
6430
6431
6432
6433
6434
6435
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6444
6445
6446
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
DeM 120
DeM 121
DeM 122
DeM 123
DeM 124
DeM 125
DeM 126
DeM 127
DeM 128
DeM 129
DeM 130
DeM 131
DeM 132
DeM 133
DeM 134
DeM 135
DeM 136
DeM 137
DeM 138
DeM 139
DeM 140
DeM 141
DeM 142
DeM 143
DeM 144
DeM 145
DeM 146
DeM 147
DeM 148
DeM 149
DeM 150
DeM 151
DeM 152
DeM 153
DeM 154
DeM 155
DeM 156
DeM 157
DeM 158
DeM 159
DeM 160
DeM 161
DeM 162
DeM 163
DeM 164
DeM 165
DeM 166
DeM 167
DeM 168
6457
6458
6459
6460
6461
6462
6463
6464
6465
6466
6467
6468
6469
6470
6471
6472
6473
6474
6475
6476
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6482
6483
6484
6485
6486
6487
6488
6489
6490
6491
6492
6493
6494
6495
6496
6497
DeM 169
DeM 170
DeM 171
DeM 172
DeM 173
DeM 174
DeM 175
DeM 176
DeM 177
DeM 178
DeM 179
DeM 180
DeM 181
DeM 182
DeM 183
DeM 184
DeM 185
DeM 186
DeM 187
DeM 188
DeM 189
DeM 190
DeM 191
DeM 192
DeM 193
DeM 194
DeM 195
DeM 196
DeM 197
DeM 198
DeM 199
DeM 200
DeM 201
DeM 202
DeM 203
DeM 204
DeM 205
DeM 206
DeM 207
DeM 208
DeM 209
170
171
Figures
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Wine making from the tomb of Bakt IIId in Beni Hassan, 11th
dynasty (Newberry 1893: Pl. VI; Tallet 1995: 482-485; cf.
Murray 2000: 593). [Chapter 4.2.1].
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
172
Abbreviations
ASAE
ADIK
BSEG
BIFAO
BOREAS
CoA I-III
DLE
EES
GM
IFAO
JAOS
JARCE
JEA
JNES
KMI
MDAIK
MZ
OLA
Wb
ZS
gFo
173
Bibliography
Aldred, C.
1973
Allam, S.
1963
Astour, M.C.
1964
Athenaeus
1961
Bietak, M.
1975
Bouvier, G.
1999
2000a
2000b
2001
2003
Bleiberg, E.
1996
174
Brunner, H.
1944
ern, J.
1964
1965
Davies, N de G.
1917
Derchain, P.
1965
Dijk, J v.
1992
2008
er-Raziq, M.A.
1979
Eyre, C.J.
1980
175
Fairman, H.W.
1951
Hieratic inscriptions. The City of Akhenaten Part III The Central City
and Official Quaters. Pendlebury, J. D. S. (Ed.). Vol. 1-2. London:
Egypt Exploration Society.
Faulkner, R. O.
1962
Frandsen, P. J.
1990
Fox, M.V.
1985
The Song of Songs and the Ancient Egypt Love songs. Wisconsin: The
University Press.
Gardiner, A. H.
1918
1941
Ramesside texts relating to the taxation and transport of corn. JEA 27:
19-73.
1947
1948a
1948b
The founding of a new Delta town in the Twentieth Dynasty. JEA 34:
19-22.
1948c
1957
Griffith, F.Ll.
1894
176
2006b
Habachi, L.
1972
The Second Stela of Kamose and his struggle against the Hyksos Ruler
and his Capital. ADIK 8.
1975
Hall, H.R
1928
Hamada, A.
1947
Hannig, R.
1995
Hansen, N.B.
2001
Haring, B. J. J.
1997
Hari, R.
1976
177
Hayes, W. C.
1951
Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III. JNES 10: 35-40, 82-104,
156-183, 231-242.
Helck, W.
1961
1963
1967
Hepper, F. N.
1990
Hoch, J. E.
1994
Hope, C.A.
1977
Excavations at Malkata and the Birket Habu 1971-1974. Jar Sealings and
Amphorae of the 18th dynasty: A Technological study. Egyptology
Today. No. 2 Vol. V. Warminster: Aris & Phillips Ltd.
1993
The jar sealings. Stone vessels, pottery and sealings from the tomb of
Tutankhamun. J. Baines (Ed.). Oxford: Griffith Institute, Ashmolean
Museum.
Hornung, E.
1982
Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt. The One and The Many. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hggman, S.
2002
178
Ikram, S.
1995
2001
James, T.G.H.
1995
The earliest history of wine and its importance in ancient Egypt. The
Origins and Ancient History of Wine. McGovern, P. (Ed.); Fleming, S.;
Katz, S. Luxemburg: Gordon and Breach.
Janssen, J. J.
1966
1975
Junge, F.
2001
Kaplony, P.
1963
Katary, S.L.D.
1989
Kemp, B. J.
1991
Kjrling, A.
2006
Koenig, Y.
1980
Leahy, M.A.
1985
Lerstrup, A.
1992
179
Lesko, L.H.
1978
King Tuts Wine Cellar. 2nd edition. Berkeley: B.C. Scribe Publications.
1995
Egyptian wine production during the New Kingdom. The Origins and
Ancient History of Wine. McGovern, P. (Ed.); Fleming, S.; Katz, S.
Luxemburg: Gordon and Breach.
Loret, V.
1892
Manley, B.
1996
Mathieu, B.
1996
Morenz, S.
1992
Murray, M.A.
2000
Peet, T.E.
1927
Pendlebury, J. D. S.
1935
1951
The City of Akhenaten Part III The Central City and Official Quaters.
Vol. 1-2; text & plates. London: Egypt Exploration Society.
Petrie, W. M. F.
1894
180
Pinch, G.
2002
2004
Poo, M-C.
1995
Wine and Wine offering in the Religion of Ancient Egypt. London: Kegan
Paul.
2001
Quirke, S.
2000
Ranke, H.
1935
Reeves, N.
1990
Robins, G.
1993
Schiaparelli, E.
1920
Schmidt, J. D.
1973
181
Sethe, K.
1916
Von Zahlen und Zahlworten bei den alten gyptern und was fr andere
Vlker und Sprachen daraus zu lernen ist. Strassburg: Druck von M.
DuMont Schauberg.
Shaw, I.
2000
Spencer, P.
1984
Spiegelberg, W.
1898
1923
Stadelmann, R.
1969
Tallet, P
1995
1998a
1998b
2003
Les Circuits conomiques selon les tiquettes de jarres de Deir elMdineh. Deir el-Mdineh et la Valle des Rois. Paris: Muse du
Louvre.
Traunecker, C & F
1984
Troy, L.
1986
182
Varille, A.
1968
Wood, B. G.
1987
Yoyotte, J.
1957
183