Employee Motivation
Employee Motivation
PROJECT REPORT
ON
EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION
By
SELWYN PRABHAKAR
In partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the award of the degree
of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Content
Introduction
Page
Methodology
14
Research Design
15
Literature Review
16
20
Findings
38
Summary
40
Recommendations
43
Conclusion
44
45
INTRODUCTION
The sample size was limited and thereby could not take into account all the employees of the
organization for the study.
With the presence of a neutral answer choice, it was difficult to gauge the attitude and profile
of certain respondents.
A few respondents had chosen multiple options where only one option was required according
to the question.
The Company
Sourcebits is a software development company with offices in Bangalore, India and Atlanta, USA.
Established in April 2006, the company has a strength of over two hundred award-winning developers
and designers. Sourcebits is at the bleeding edge of emerging technologies and has quickly become one
of the worlds top destinations for iPhone, iPad, Mac, Android, BlackBerry, Adobe AIR and Web
application development.
Sourcebits' development center for iPad, Android, BlackBerry, Palm Pre, RIA and iPhone builds worldclass, best-selling applications tailored to client specifications. Their programmers and user interface
experts leverage the latest development trends and the freshest techniques. Sourcebits is an industry
leader in advanced software, Web portal and visual design. They take pride in being one of the most
creative and forward-looking software development companies in the world.
Sourcebits Clients
General Electric
Sling Media
Pointy Heads
Coca Cola
Skyfire
ESRI
Meredith
Freeverse
6
They doublecheck the strength and security of each and every line of code for the client's peace of
mind, and they can optimize for platformspecific hosting such as Amazon Web Services or the Google
Application Engine.
Android, Blackberry and Palm Pre Application Development
With the astonishing success of iPhone and the word App now solidly in the mainstream, it didnt
take long for BlackBerry and Palm to open their smartphone platforms to third party developers, or for
Google to enter the market with its own popular mobile operating system: Android. Android, in
particular, with its open source roots and optimization for Googles Web apps is quickly gaining
traction as the chief rival to iPhone. As with Android, Sourcebits is pushing boundaries on the other
popular smartphone platforms: BlackBerry and Palm Pre. Totaling around 25% the worldwide
smartphone market, publishers simply cannot ignore BlackBerry and the Pre.
Mac Applications and Game Development
Sourcebits offers a wide variety of native Mac applications development ranging from 3D games to
business applications. Sourcebits faithfully sticks to Apples elegant user interface philosophy,
producing visually stunning and featurerich applications built on the latest technologies. Their code is
fast, clean and efficient, and each line is unique and projectspecific.
It's the technological revolution that at times brings surprising opportunities for some nations. India,
though not among the front runners in terms of economic growth, has successfully utilized such
opportunities in the revolution to become an IT hotspot. For the past several years, India has been an
increasingly favored destination for customized software development. As a result, a number of
software companies in India have come up. Not only the number of players has increased in the Indian
IT market, but at the same time, Indian software companies have done considerably well in the global
market. Such huge success of software companies in India has given birth to a new speculation
whether other developing countries should imitate Indian example and whether the success of India
would constitute a competitive challenge to the software industry of the developed world or not.
With the huge success of the software companies in India, the Indian software industry in turn has
become successful in making a mark in the global arena. This industry has been instrumental in driving
the economy of the nation on to a rapid growth curve. As per the study of NASSCOM-Deloitte, the
contribution of IT/ITES industry to the GDP of the country has soared up to a share of 5% in 2007
from a mere 1.2% in 1998. Besides, this industry has also recorded revenue of US$ 64 billion with a
growth rate of 33% in the fiscal year ended in 2008.
The export of software has also grown up, which has been instrumental in the huge success of the
Indian software companies as well as the industry. In fact, software export from India accounts for
more than 65% of the total software revenue. The domestic software market largely depends upon sale
of software packages and products, which constitute major part of revenues. Products account for
almost 40% of the domestic market. On the other hand, more than 80% of revenue from software
exports comes from software services like custom software development and consultancy services etc.
Between 2008 and 2013, the India IT-ITES industry is projected to expand at an average growth rate of
13.9 percent with the domestic market growing slightly higher at 15.8 percent, compared to exports
growth of 12.7 percent.
With the demand of smart phones like iPhones and Google's android, the demand for mobile apps
development has grown manifolds. The interface of iPhone/Android application development is ground
breaking. Today, many computer manufacturers have adopted the same interactive technology for
handheld PCs and laptops. As per a latest estimate, the sales of iPhones have reached a whopping $21.4
million. The popularity of this smart phone has prompted many to develop third party iPhone
applications which are compatible and have a huge market in terms of business growth and profit.
Apple has devised a unique way where iPhone application developers are allowed to bid the pricing for
their applications. Apple will claim only 30% of the bidding price while the remaining will 70% share
would be of the developers. Although the idea is too good to believe, slowly many iPhone apps
developers started creating iPhone enabled applications. Today iPhone apps development is a billion
dollar industry and programmers are earning exorbitantly.
The demand for iPhone/Android apps has opened up new avenues for development companies. Many
companies offer cost-effective and feature-enhancing solutions to the clients. The variety of services
include offering enhancing features of iPhone, customizing the themes and icons, integrating the power
of internet with iPhone among others.
Many consider iPhones to be smartest of all smart phones. However, android based applications have
also brought a new wave in the mobile apps market. Dynamic and innovative mobile apps can be
developed in Android based platform for the smart phone users. Apart from the basic features like web
browser, Google map application, music player, calendar and contact list, android based apps offer
10
many inventive features including Blue-tooth, CDMA, touch screens, video camera, P2P using Google
talk etc.
Since Android platform is open source, it incorporates cutting-edge technologies for the developers
community as and when they evolve.
Future trends in Mobile Application Development
The world of mobile applications is fast paced and dynamic, with new features and functionalities
emerging constantly. However, a cursory observation of the mobile application development industry
will show several main directions the industry is heading in. Several of these future trends are the direct
result of new technologies developed by the major players in the industry such as Apple and Google.
In the last few years the mobile applications and devices sector has seen radical change. Mobile devices
have been manufactured with wider screens, faster processors and increased graphical capability.
Network providers offer better data plans allowing constant connectivity to the internet and more
developers than ever are creating applications for mobile devices. All these developments have allowed
previously unfeasible features to be brought to mobile devices.
Banking Services
With the continued success of business focused mobile devices such as the BlackBerry, mobile banking
services have the potential to really become prominent in the future. As well as appealing to business
users, banking services such as money transfer are popular in developing markets due to low costs and
faster speeds than traditional services. Mobile banking is one of the fastest growing industries
worldwide and has given rise to several new business models such as online banks and internet wealth
managers. Mobile payment systems, where users can pay wirelessly at the point of sale, are also
experiencing continual increases in popularity. This is particularly true in developing countries where
mobile infrastructure is more reliable than fixed line infrastructure.
Although mobile banking services are expected to become more widespread each year, there are
several key challenges that this fledging industry must overcome. Firstly, mobile platform
fragmentation will be detrimental to the growth of mobile banking as fragmentation will make it
difficult for firms to develop a mobile banking solution that everyone can use. Secondly, regulatory
11
requirements may cause a slowdown in the market due to security concerns about mobile financial
transactions. Encryption of transmitted data, device authentication and encryption of data stored on the
device are all current security issues. Regulations are likely to differ between markets increasing the
cost of entering several markets at once.
12
Advertising
Signs indicate that mobile advertising will soon become increasingly prominent. Mobile hardware
manufacturers are constantly developing devices with wider screens which will help the mobile
advertising sector. The entrance of Google into the mobile sector also indicates that mobile advertising
is set to increase as Google will want to extend its desktop advertising empire to the mobile web.
Advertising will also allow developers to offer free advertising funded applications, creating a new
business model of mobile applications.
13
METHODOLOGY
The project consisted of finding out that factor which motivates the employees the most. The most
appropriate means to ascertain such information was to conduct a motivation survey. The research
undertaken was a descriptive research as it sought to describe the characteristics of a small sample of
employees with regards to what motivated them the most and also classifying them into personality
driven motivational profiles. The project consisted of three stages.
STAGE 1 Gathering information and inputs to frame the necessary questions for the survey.
STAGE 2 Collecting data using the survey method, by getting the sample employees fill the
questionnaire.
STAGE 3 Analysing and interpreting the primary data collected from the survey responses.
Research Methodology : -
Problem definition To ascertain what factor motivated the employees the most according to
them and also determine their intrinsic motivational profiles.
Objectives To conduct a motivation survey by framing and administering a questionnaire to
sample respondents.
Methodology Descriptive research
14
RESEARCH DESIGN
A research design is a framework or blueprint for conducting a research project. The research design
used for this project is a descriptive research design as it is used in describing facts and characteristics
of a sample population under observation. In this project, it is used to describe the key motivator of
individual employees and to determine their various motivational profiles.
For the fulfillment of this purpose, primary data had to be collected through a questionnaire that was to
be filled by a sample of employees.
Questionnaire formulation The questionnaire consisted of 22 statements based on the Likert scale and
1 Multiple Choice Question.
Data Collection The data collection method used for the project was the survey method. The survey
method of collecting data involves questioning employees for their responses. The employees were
asked questions in the form of statements to which they agreed, disagreed or were neutral based on the
5 choice Likert scale. They were asked a variety of questions regarding their attitudes, intentions and
preferences in the light of situations and circumstances given in the statements. The questionnaire
designed for this project also consisted of a multiple choice question to ascertain the factor that
motivated the employees the most.
15
LITERATURE REVIEW
At one time, employees were considered just another input into the production of goods and services.
What perhaps changed this way of thinking about employees was research, referred to as the
Hawthorne Studies, conducted by Elton Mayo from 1924 to 1932. This study found that employees are
not motivated solely by money and that employee behavior is linked to their attitudes. The Hawthorne
Studies began the human relations approach to management, whereby the needs and motivation of
employees become the primary focus of managers.
Motivation Defined
Many contemporary authors have also defined the concept of motivation. Motivation has been defined
as the psychological process that gives behavior purpose and direction; a predisposition to behave in a
purposive manner to achieve specific, unmet needs an internal drive to satisfy an unsatisfied need and
the will to achieve.
Extrinsic motivation is exactly the opposite of intrinsic motivation where in which motivation comes
from external factors as mentioned above. This project seeks to determine both intrinsic and extrinsic
factors that motivated employees.
Why do we need motivated employees? The answer is survival. Motivated employees are needed in our
rapidly changing workplaces. Motivated employees help organizations survive. Motivated employees
are more productive. To be effective, managers need to understand what motivates employees within
the context of the roles they perform and their age. Of all the functions a manager performs, motivating
employees is arguably the most complex. This is due, in part, to the fact that what motivates employees
changes constantly. For example, research suggests that as employees' income increases, money
becomes less of a motivator. Also, as employees get older, interesting work becomes more of a
motivator.
Motivation Theories
Understanding what motivated employees and how they were motivated was the focus of many
researchers following the publication of the Hawthorne Study results. Five major approaches that have
led to our understanding of motivation are Maslow's need-hierarchy theory, Herzberg's two- factor
theory, Vroom's expectancy theory, Adams' equity theory, and Skinner's reinforcement theory.
According to Maslow, employees have five levels of needs: physiological, safety, social, ego, and selfactualizing. Maslow argued that lower level needs had to be satisfied before the next higher level need
would motivate employees. Herzberg's work categorized motivation into two factors: motivators and
hygienes. Motivator or intrinsic factors, such as achievement and recognition, produce job satisfaction.
Hygiene or extrinsic factors, such as pay and job security, produce job dissatisfaction.
Vroom's theory is based on the belief that employee effort will lead to performance and performance
will lead to rewards. Rewards may be either positive or negative. The more positive the reward the
more likely the employee will be highly motivated. Conversely, the more negative the reward the less
likely the employee will be motivated.
17
Adams' theory states that employees strive for equity between themselves and other workers. Equity is
achieved when the ratio of employee outcomes over inputs is equal to other employee outcomes over
inputs.
Skinner's theory simply states those employees' behaviors that lead to positive outcomes will be
repeated and behaviors that lead to negative outcomes will not be repeated. Managers should positively
reinforce employee behaviors that lead to positive outcomes. Managers should negatively reinforce
employee behavior that leads to negative outcomes.
However the following motivation theory called McClelland's Theory of Acquired Needs was used as a
base for formulating the questionnaire and aiding the purpose of the project.
In his acquired-needs theory, David McClelland proposed that an individual's specific needs are
acquired over time and are shaped by one's life experiences. Most of these needs can be classed as
achievement, affiliation, or power. A person's motivation and effectiveness in certain job functions are
influenced by these three needs. McClelland's theory sometimes is referred to as the three need theory
or as the learned needs theory.
Achievement
People with a high need for achievement (nAch) seek to excel and thus tend to avoid both low-risk and
high-risk situations. Achievers avoid low-risk situations because the easily attained success is not a
genuine achievement. In high-risk projects, achievers see the outcome as one of chance rather than
one's own effort. High nAch individuals prefer work that has a moderate probability of success, ideally
a 50% chance. Achievers need regular feedback in order to monitor the progress of their achievements.
18
Affiliation
Those with a high need for affiliation (nAff) need harmonious relationships with other people and need
to feel accepted by other people. They tend to conform to the norms of their work group. High nAff
individuals prefer work that provides significant personal interaction. They perform well in customer
service and client interaction situations.
Power
A person's need for power (nPow) can be one of two types - personal and institutional. Those who need
personal power want to direct others, and this need often is perceived as undesirable. Persons who need
institutional power (also known as social power) want to organize the efforts of others to further the
goals of the organization. Managers with a high need for institutional power tend to be more effective
than those with a high need for personal power.
High achievers should be given challenging projects with reachable goals. They should be
provided frequent feedback. While money is not an important motivator, it is an effective form
of feedback.
Overall Analysis
Statement 1 - I feel that my superior/team leader always recognises the work done by me.
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree Disagree Neutral
SA
58% of the employee's feel that their superiors recognise the work done by them. 19% strongly agree,
22% are neutral and only 1% disagrees with the statement.
Most of the employees are happy of the fact that their superior/team leader recognizes the work done
by them.
Disagree Neutral
SA
20
54% of the employees feel their job gives them a good status. 19% strongly feel their job gives them a
good status. Whereas 19% are neutral about it and 2% disagree with the statement.
The employees enjoy the good status their job gives them.
SA
SD
47% of the employees consider their visibility with the top management to be important. 23% strongly
agree and 28% are neutral about the importance. 1% disagrees and another 1% strongly disagrees.
The employees want to be seen with and recognized by the top management.
SA
SD
50% of the employees find that there is a fair amount of team spirit in the organisation. 9% strongly
agree, 33% are neutral, 5% disagree and 3% strongly feel there is no team spirit in the organisation.
The employees are contented with the amount of team spirit in the organization.
21
Neutral
SA
59% strongly agree that they want to be the best at their jobs. 38% agree and 2% are neutral about the
statement. None of the employees disagree.
The employees want to perform to their fullest at their job and hence want to be the best at their job.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree
Disagree Neutral
SA
52% find opportunities for advancement in the organisation. 25% are neutral about the statement. 7%
disagree and 16% strongly disagree.
Most employees find opportunities for growth and career advancement in the organisation.
22
Statement 10 - You feel the need to make sure that things around you are working in tandem with
company goals.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
56% feel the need to make sure that things around them are working in tandem with company goals.
12% strongly agree with the statement. 28% are neutral about it. 3% disagree and 1% strongly
disagrees with the statement.
Most employees feel the need to control things around them and make sure that everything is
working in the best interest of the company.
Statement 11 - You seek to have a certain amount of control over the working and performance of your
colleagues regardless of position.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
48% of the employees seek to have a certain amount of control over the working and performance of
their colleagues regardless of their position. 7% strongly feel the same. 31% are neutral. 10% don't
23
Statement 12 - You generally tend to seek guidance from your colleagues, seniors and/or your leader.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree
Disagree
Neutral
SA
53% of the employees tend to seek guidance from their colleagues and seniors. 25% strongly tend to
seek guidance. 20% think neutrally and 2% don't tend to seek any sort of guidance.
Employees are highly dependent on others for guidance.
Disagree
Neutral
SA
71% of the employees always tend to work with a sense of direction. 23% strongly agree. 5% are
neutral when it comes to working with a sense of direction and 1% doesnt tend to work with a sense of
direction.
All employees are direction oriented and focused when they are working.
24
Disagree
Neutral
SA
53% of the employees feel the need to belong to a team or a work group and 31% of them strongly feel
that need. 15% are neutral about the statement and 1% do feel the need to belong to any team or work
group.
Employees have a high need for affiliation and relationships.
Statement 15 - You are motivated when working with others rather than when working individually.
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Agree
Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
38% of the employees find themselves motivated when working with others rather than when working
individually. 29% strongly feel motivated when working with others. Just below 28% are neutral about
the statement. Only 4% are motivated while working individually and 1% is strongly motivated
25
working by themselves.
Most employees were very team oriented and hence they were motivated working with others.
Disagree
Neutral
SA
SD
41% of the employees strongly value relationships at the workplace and 37% agree with valuing
relationships at the workplace. 13% are neutral about the statement. But 6% disagree and 3% strongly
disagree.
The employees seem to highly regard and value their relationship with others.
SA
SD
22% of the employees agree and 7% strongly agree that they prefer working independently. A majority
55% are neutral about the statement while 13% disagree and 3% strongly disagree with the statement.
For most employees working independently and not working independently does not matter.
26
Statement 18 - You tend to plan and schedule your own work/task without supervision.
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Agree
Disagree
Neutral
SA
47% of the employees tend to plan and schedule their own work without supervision. 26% are neutral
towards the statement. 14% and 13% disagree and strongly disagree implying that they are dependent
when it comes to planning and scheduling their work.
Employees are independent when it comes to planning and scheduling their own task.
Statement 19 - You normally do not take help or advice from colleagues and seniors.
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree
Disagree
Neutral
SA
A majority of 47% of the employees disagree with the statement implying that they do take help or
advice from colleagues and seniors. 17% and 12% agree and strongly agree to the statement implying
they do not normally take any help or advice. 24% are neutral towards to the statement.
Employees do take help and advice from colleagues and seniors implying that they are dependent to
an extent.
27
Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
37% of the employees agree and 9% strongly agree with the statement. 32% are neutral towards the
statement. 17% and 5% disagree and strongly disagree with the statement respectively.
Being comfortable and getting ahead are equally important for employees.
Statement 21 - You are satisfied to be no more better than your colleagues at work.
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Agree
Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
37% of the employees disagree and 14% strongly disagree to the statement implying that they are keen
on being better than their colleagues. 33% of the employees are neutral and only 1% agree with the
statement.
Employees are highly competitive at work.
28
Statement 22 I sometimes try to achieve more than what is required from my target.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agree
Disagree Neutral
SA
SD
More than half of the employees agree and 28% strongly agree that they try to achieve more than what
is required from their target. 10% are neutral about the statement while 4% and 1% disagree and
strongly disagree with the statement respectively.
Employees are highly achievement oriented and have a need for achievement.
29
Career development
Financial incentives
A/T
Competition
Fringe benefits
Job security
Rew ards and recognition
No responses
Mixed
Other
For a majority of 45% of the employees, Career development was their most motivating factor while
23% of the employees found the financial incentives to be the most motivating factor for them. 8%
chose rewards and recognition, 7% showed a mixed response by chose more than one factor. 6% chose
job security. 4 % of the employees did not respond while 2% were motivated by competition. 1% chose
activities and training to be most motivating while another 1% was most motivated by fringe benefits.
However 3% chose other motivating factors. What motivated 3% of the employees was the fact that
they were working for the best company in the industry.
Employees are generally motivated by growth and career development opportunities provided by
the organisation.
30
RECOGNITION
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q1
52
---
26
22
---
Q2
56
24
18
---
Q4
50
32
16
---
Q1
62
19
17
---
Q2
51
28
19
---
Q4
45
25
28
---
AGE 26-30
It can be noted that among employees belonging to both the age groups, a majority of them had agreed
to statements that highlight a sense of recognition implying that most of the employees under age
groups 21-25 and 26-30 were very likely to be inherently motivated by a sense of recognition. Under
age group 21-25, 74%, 74% and 66% agreed to statements 1, 2 and 4 respectively. Under age group 2630, 79%, 70% and 73% agreed to statements 1, 2 and 4 as against only 2% for disagreeing to the same
statements.
All employees are motivated by being recognized by their colleagues and superiors.
31
AFFILIATION
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q5
54
32
Q14
50
---
12
38
---
Q15
34
32
32
---
Q16
28
20
40
Q5
47
34
13
---
Q14
53
20
25
---
Q15
42
24
26
Q16
48
40
---
AGE 26-30
It is evident from the table that among employees belonging to both the age groups, a vast majority of
them had agreed to statements that highlight a sense of affiliation and belonging implying that most of
the employees under age groups 21-25 and 26-30 were inherently motivated by having a sense of
affiliation and belonging within the organisation, department or team. Under age group 21-25, a
majority of 60%, 78%, 64% and 68% agreed to statements 5, 14, 15 and 16 as against only 8%, 0%, 2%
and 12% disagreeing to the same statements.
Employees regardless of age group valued relationships at the workplace and had a high need for
affiliation.
32
ACHEIVEMENT/COMPETITION
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q8
40
---
58
---
Q9
60
22
12
---
Q20
40
14
28
12
Q21
16
32
36
14
Q22
10
26
---
Q8
38
---
57
---
Q9
42
30
20
---
Q20
34
18
38
Q21
13
42
32
13
---
Q22
54
32
AGE 26-30
According to the responses mentioned in the table, employees belonging to both the age groups are
high on a need for achievement and are equally motivated by a sense of competition. For example
statement 21 states You are satisfied to be no more better than your colleagues at work to which a
majority of 55% of the employees under age group 26-30 agree as against only 13% disagreeing
implying that those 13% of the employees maybe high on achievement but at the same time not so
competitive. Similar findings are recorded for the employees under 21-25.
All employees wanted to achieve by performing better and being the best at their job.
33
CONTROL
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q10
60
26
10
Q11
44
10
34
Q10
53
32
11
---
Q11
51
11
30
AGE 26-30
According to the data derived from the table, although most employees under both age groups agreed
to statements 10 and 11 that highlight the need to control, employees under age 26-30 seemed to
exhibit more need for control when compared to responses pertaining to employees under age group
21-26
Older and more experienced employees felt the need to control. This indicates that as people in the
organisation grow older, their general need to maintain or exert control increases by certain
degrees.
34
DIRECTION
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q12
46
24
28
---
Q13
72
20
---
Q12
57
18
23
---
Q13
72
---
24
---
AGE 26-30
Working with a sense of direction is a priority for almost all employees under both the age groups. All
the employees almost equally find it important to work with a sense of direction, seeking some form of
guidance from colleagues and superiors at the same time. Under age group 21-25, 24% and 6% of
employees have a neutral attitude towards statements 12 and 13. Under age group 26-30, 18% and 4%
of employees show a neutral response towards a sense of direction and guidance.
Most employees worked with focus and direction receiving guidance from time to time.
35
INDEPENDENCE/AUTONOMY
AGE 21-25
SA
SD
Q17
18
14
54
10
Q18
48
18
26
---
Q19
22
42
24
12
---
Q17
23
14
57
Q18
47
10
28
15
---
Q19
11
53
23
13
---
AGE 26-30
For statement 17 which highlights work independence as a preference, employees under both age
groups show similar results where a majority 54 and 57% are neutral about working independently. For
statement 18 which highlights work autonomy and scheduling, employees under the group 26-30 seem
to be more in favour of work autonomy than employees under the age group 21-25. For statement 19,
the employees under age group 21-25 are more in favour of not taking help from colleagues or seniors
whereas only 11% of employees between age group 26-30 agreed to the statement. This meant that
work autonomy was high among employees between the age group 26-30 and work independence was
slightly high among younger employees.
Older employees tend to plan and schedule their work whereas the younger employees generally
prefer working independently
36
50% of the employees between the age group 21-25 chose career development opportunities as their
major motivating factor. 22% of the respondents found financial incentives as their key motivating
factor. The 3rd majority of the group, that is 8% of the group found the job security factor motivating
them. 6% were motivated by rewards and recognition. Another 6% had chosen multiple motivating
factors. 2% were motivated by fringe benefits and another 2% were motivated by other factors. 4% of
the employees didn't respond.
Employees were motivated more by career growth and development opportunities provided by the
company.
37
The data appears to be the same for employees between age group 26-30 as it for employees belonging
to the age group 21-25. Majority of the employees that is 38% were motivated by career development
opportunities while 25% of the employees were motivated by financial incentives. Rewards and
recognition gained 3rd place with 11% of the respondents being motivated by them. 5% were motivated
by job security and another 5% were motivated by competition while only 2% of the employees were
motivated by employee and training sessions etc. 6% chose multiple motivating factors and 5% of the
employees for were motivated by other factors. 4% didn't respond.
Older employees were motivated less by career development opportunities and more by financial
incentives.
38
FINDINGS
Career development opportunities was the most motivating factor for a majority of the
employees.
A second majority of employees were most motivated by the financial incentives provided by
the company.
All the employees were motivated by being recognised and having a sense of achievement and
competition.
Employees valued relationships at the workplace and were motivated working in teams
implying that they had a high need for affiliation.
All employees regardless of age sought some guidance from colleagues and superiors.
Employees within the age group 21-25 tend to be more dependent at the workplace
Employees within the age group 26-30 tend to be more independent and self-autonomous at
work
39
SUMMARY
From the age-based analysis and interpretation, it can be found that employees belonging to both age
groups 21-25 and 26-30 are driven by a sense of recognition in the workplace and they also feel that it
is a very important and an integral part of their motivation. This result directly corresponds with the
results pertaining to the achievement/competition factor because the same employees who were driven
by a sense of recognition showed a tendency to achieve or be competitive at their workplace. Almost all
of the respondents wanted to be best at their jobs and also found opportunities for advancement on the
organization thereby indicating that a combination of a sense of recognition and
achievement/competition automatically led them to be optimistic about their growth and advancement
in the organization. While majority of employees under both age groups always tried to achieve more
than what was required from their job target, surprisingly for most employees, being comfortable was
more important than getting ahead implying that although they wanted to achieve, they didnt prefer to
do it at the cost of the comfort they perceived was important. Almost all the employees wanted to be
better than their colleagues at the workplace. From the interpretation of the responses from employees,
it can be proved that having a sense of recognition and the need to achieve and be competitive were
interrelated and that even if some employees are not motivated by achievement and competition, they
are certainly motivated by a sense of recognition. The sense of recognition is linked with Maslows
Social Needs which must be fulfilled so that one can move on to having self-esteem.
When it comes to the need for power and the desire to control, the findings suggest that the older
employees between the age group 26-30 seek have to have some amount of control over the working
and performance of their colleagues regardless of their position and also felt the need to monitor and
make sure that things around them were working in tandem with company goals. Only a few
employees between the age group 21-25 had some desire to control implying that the more experienced
and older an employee in the organization is, the more would be his/her need and desire to control.
40
When it comes to working with a sense of direction, all employees under both age groups always
worked with a sense of direction. But when it came to seeking guidance from colleagues, seniors or
leaders, more number of the older employees agreed to seeking guidance from either colleagues,
seniors or their leaders while some of the younger employees were neutral about seeking any sort of
guidance from others. What can be inferred is that working with direction and guidance is important
regardless of whether a person had the need to control or didnt seek a need to control. What can also
be seen is that almost all younger employees sought guidance from others in the workplace which
proves the fact that even if an employee receives recognition or has a high sense of achievement and
competition, an individual employee will continue to seek guidance in order to achieve their purpose as
a contributor and an asset of the organization.
More than half of the employees from both age groups were neutral about working independently
suggesting that work independence or dependence didnt matter much to them but this contradicts the
fact that the employees between age group 21-25 did not plan and schedule their own work or task and
always depended on their leader or superior to give them tasks. However the older employees between
age group 26-30 showed a parallel response as most of them tended to plan and schedule their own
work and task without supervision. Almost all employees under both the age groups took help or advice
from colleagues and seniors. What can be generally inferred is that regardless of age, all the employees
showed signs of dependence in the workplace and needed someone to govern, mentor and guide them
while performing their task. An employee may receive recognition for his/her work, may want to
achieve above his/her target or may want to always perform better than his/her colleagues but may still
tend to seek guidance, help and governance from other employees in the workplace simply because he
may not have yet reached a stage of employment where independence and self-autonomy come
naturally with certain factors like age and experience. According to the results of the study, financial
incentives is the second most core factor that motivated employees, so it just proves that unless passion
for work replaces monetary benefits as a core motivator, an employee may still find himself seeking
guidance, help and governance in every aspect of his job.
One trend to be noted is that all the employees regardless of age have a high sense of affiliation. They
all valued relationships at the workplace and were also motivated when working with others rather than
working by themselves individually. So the paramount inference that can be drawn from the results is
41
that the employees are typical high achievers who are recognized, want to be recognized for their work
and who also want to compete to perform better than their colleagues, but at the same time they also
want to be directed, guided and helped by their superiors or leaders in every aspect of their work
proving that they are dependent to a major extent and cannot self-direct themselves. This is mainly due
to the fact that most of the employees in the study were young freshmen with little or not as much
experience as that of the older and experienced employees in the organisation. According to
McGregors theory Y, people are inherently motivated to perform better and hence they did not need
much coaxing or correction which is the case here but for theory Y employees, to reach the top of
Maslows pyramid i.e. in this case reaching a level of self dependence and autonomy would come with
age, experience and a strong passion for the work.
A majority i.e. 45% of the employees were most motivated by career development opportunities while
the 2nd majority where most motivated by financial incentives. 8% of the employees were motivated by
the job security they perceived. However a key thing to be noted is that 2% of the employees were
motivated by the fact that they were working for the best company in the industry. Employees within
the age group 21-25 were motivated by career development opportunities by 13% more than employees
under age group 26-30. This implies that career development opportunities are preferred by young
employees because they are at a stage in the career development life cycle where they see the
importance of growth and therefore need career growth in order to fulfill their career objectives and
survive as healthy and motivated employees. But as an employee grows with age and job experience
thereby reaching a certain desired pedestal, the desire for growth gradually levels off with career
development opportunities not being the core motivating factor.
These results can be justified by the fact that the Web/Mobile application development industry
recently came into being and is still growing at an increasing rate with major clients such as Apple,
Googles Android and Facebook seeking talented young individuals to contribute to technology and
society through intelligent and smart web and mobile based applications. Sourcebits Technologies is
considered be one of the top leaders in the iPhone and Game development industry and therefore it
is instinctive for young and talented employees to seek for growth and career development
opportunities as developers in a company like Sourcebits. The employees of the organisation are
divided into teams based on their role, task and expertise thus every employee is part of a team that
42
works towards the completion of set goals. This justifies the fact that according to the study all
employees had a need for affiliation hence they valued relationships and were motivated working
with others rather than working individually.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are some of the recommendations that can be used to motivate employees.
Recognizing teams or work groups for their joint effort rather than individual contributors.
Teams with similar tasks or projects can compete with each other for the faster completion of
projects.
Teams can have an informal retreat or an off site meeting where members get to know each
other and also set goals and develop plans.
A one day sporting event or picnic can be used as a simple breather from everyday work
making the employees happier.
Encouraging employees to write a short testimonial of how they could enhance their skills and
put their talent to creative use only because of the opportunities the company gave them.
Exposing the employees to international job or short term project opportunities for development
and knowledge sharing.
Having employees set their career goals and expectations so that a career counselor can guide
them in drafting a development plan or blueprint helping them focus on projects that will take
them in the direction which will facilitate long-term success.
Implementing certain methods or techniques that would create of feeling of oneness with the
company in the minds of the employees.
43
CONCLUSION
In the light of the results and findings, it is noted that most of the employees are motivated by the
career development opportunities provided by the company and a second majority of employees are
motivated by financial incentives. Most of the employees who were motivated by career development
opportunities were between the age group 21-25 implying that young employees with little or no work
experience were driven more by the career development opportunities provided by the company
whereas for the older employees with some amount of work experience career development
opportunities were not the paramount motivator. Hence as an employee grows in age and experience
within an organization, he is motivated more by certain other factors that can also include the demands
of the job itself.
All the employees in the organization were motivated by being recognized by colleagues and superiors
and also having a need for achievement and a sense of competition. At the same time they were
dependent on other colleagues and superiors and always sought some guidance from them. The reason
for them being dependent may be due to the fact that they all were team oriented and showed a high
need for affiliation so depending on other fellow employees came naturally to them.
Employees must be allowed to work together in teams in order to collectively achieve their group
targets which ultimately lead to the fulfillment of company goals. Absence of such teams may lead to
unhealthy competition and power conflicts between individual employees ultimately causing
employees to be demotivated. Since a majority of the employees in the organization are young, the
management must focus on creating opportunities that would aid in the growth and development of an
employees career thereby maintaining and nurturing a motivated employee workforce.
44
BIBLIOGRAPHY
www.sourcebits.com
www.articlebase.com
www.articlesnatch.com
www.google.com
45
46