TAN Vs CA
TAN Vs CA
HELD: Yes
examination is conducted by
respondent company.
There is no strong showing that we should apply
the "fine print" or "contract of adhesion" rule in
this case. (Sweet Lines, Inc. v. Teves, 83 SCRA
361 [1978]). The petitioners cite:
It is a matter of common
knowledge that large amounts of
money are collected from ignorant
persons by companies and
associations which adopt high
sounding titles and print the
amount of benefits they agree to
pay in large black-faced type,
following such undertakings by fine
print conditions which destroy the
substance of the promise. All
provisions, conditions, or
exceptions which in any way tend
to work a forfeiture of the policy
should be construed most strongly
against those for whose benefit
they are inserted, and most