Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anthony Ciccolo Criminal Complaint
Anthony Ciccolo Criminal Complaint
Preliminary Statement
A detention hearing is required because the defendant is charged with possessing a firearm
after previously being convicted of a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one
year in violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 922(g)(1), which offense constitutes a felony that involves the
possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. ' 3142(f)(1)(E). The maximum penalty for violating
Section 922(g) is ten years in prison. See 18 U.S.C. 924(a)(2). Here, the defendant ordered
and took delivery of four firearms he had ordered, including two rifles with large ammunition
magazines, to use during his plan to kill innocent people in support of ISIL, an international
terrorist organization. The defendant is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
Therefore, he should be detained.
Special Agent Ambrogio is an Agent with the Western Massachusetts Joint Terrorism Task
Force (JTTF).
1
2.
Procedural History
On July 4, 2015, the defendant was arrested and charged in a complaint with possessing a
firearm after being previously convicted of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 922(g)(1). On
July 6, 2015, the defendant appeared before the Court and received appointed counsel. The
government filed a motion for pretrial detention and a detention hearing was scheduled for July 14,
2015. The defendant is being held in custody pending the detention hearing.
3.
On February 17, 2015, the defendant was convicted in Northern Berkshire District Court,
of the offence of Operating Under the Influence of Liquor, a violation of Massachusetts state law
Chapter 90 Section 24(1)(a)(1), a crime punishable by up to 30 months imprisonment. The
defendant was placed on probation.
4.
In the Fall of 2014, the FBI became aware that the defendant had expressed a desire to go
overseas to fight for ISIL, a foreign terrorist organization.
the defendant had a long history of mental illness and in the last 18 months had become obsessed
with Islam.
The acquaintance also said that the defendant had recently stated that he believed
that the faith is under attack and that he is not afraid to die for the cause. The acquaintance
advised that the acquaintance had received text messages from the defendant indicating that
America is "Satan" and characterizing Americans as disgusting.
On October 17, 2014, the FBI discovered a Facebook profile, under the name "Ali Al
Amriki, that contained information indicating the user was interested in martyrdom for the sake
of Islam and was living in the United States. Subsequent investigation identified the defendant
as Ali Al Amriki. On October 18, 2014, the Ali Al Amrikis Facebook page included a
2
photograph of an individual in a wooded area wearing a head covering and holding a black
machete and accompanied by the statement, Another day in the forest strengthening myself.
On October 27, 2014, Ali Al Amrikis Facebook page posted an image that appeared to be a
dead American soldier that included the following statement by Ali Al Amriki, Thank you
Islamic State! Now we wont have to deal with these kafir back in America.
non-believers of Islam.
Kafir means
Amriki had the desire to fight for ISIS (also known as ISIL).
The FBI arranged for a cooperating witness (CW-1) to meet the defendant, who told
CW-1 that he had a plan to engage in violence in support of ISIL.
defendant had an in-person meeting with CW-1 in Pittsfield, Massachusetts which was audio
recorded.
During this meeting, the defendant spoke about his plans to travel to another state to
conduct terrorist attacks on civilians, members of the U.S. military and law enforcement
personnel.
The defendant told CW-1 that he would attack two different bars and a police
improvised explosive devices during the attack to include pressure cooker bombs and/or portable
microwave bombs. The defendant stated that:
you put umh, take a pressure cooker
***
Uhm, fill it up with ah, black powder
***
Yeah, you fill it up with ball bearings,
nails, glass, rocks . . . you know
The defendant also explained that the improvised explosive device would have a built in
timer and that the device heats itself up.
On June 30, 2015, the defendant had a second in-person meeting with CW-1 which also
was audio-recorded. During that conversation, CW-1 asked the defendant whether he had
heard what happened in Tunisia. The defendant responded,
Awesome. Awesome, you know that ah, that brother in Tunisia
was impressive . . . he got like 38, 39 people one guy that is
a huge accomplishment I think.
The government believes that this was a reference to the June 26, 2015 shooting attack at
a beachside resort in Tunisia in which one person used firearms and grenades to kill 38 people.
The gunman was killed and ISIL claimed credit for the attack.
terrorist attacks occurred in other cities in France and Kuwait, in what appeared to have been
coordinated fashion.
effect that I think he cut off his bosss head in uhm, somehow pinned it to the gate of his work.
The defendant continued to talk with CW-1 about his plan to conduct a terrorist attack in
another state.
The defendant wrote out a list of items that would be needed to conduct the
attack including:
four (4) AK-47s,
two (2) sniper rifles,
four (4) handguns, and
gelignite (which the defendant explained was a blasting gelatin, a variety
of dynamite)
The defendant drew a map of the United States and showed CW-1 where the states that
he was interested in were located on the map. The defendant also stated that he wanted to
conduct an attack at a State University using assault rifles and improvised explosives.
The
defendant told CW-1 that the attack would be concentrated in the college dorms and cafeteria
and would include executions of students broadcast live via the internet.
4
The defendant told CW-1 that he planned to rob a gun store to obtain firearms and travel
out of state to purchase fireworks in order to obtain the black powder needed for the attacks.
He also stated that he would purchase pressure cookers to use as improvised explosive devices.
During the June 30, 2015 meeting the defendant also explained that he had changed his
plans from targeting a police station to targeting a university because there were many more
people at the university.
permitted to help, sit tight or leave. The defendant said that he knew how to use sniper rifles,
and that he had grown up with guns.
told CW-1 that he wanted to have tons of ammo for the assault rifles.
The defendant
wanted to do it before Ramadan was over, and no later than July 31, 2015.
He said that he
wanted to ensure that there were a lot of people there, like in a cafeteria at lunchtime, and that he
wanted the conditions to be right where he could see it with his own eyes.
that he wanted to use pressure cookers to make an explosion and referenced the Boston
Marathon bombings.
then that was okay.
During this
CW-1 inquired
whether the defendant had acquired any explosives, and the defendant said that We are gonna
need the same stuff as before. The defendant said that they would use two pressure cooker
bombs, and that the pressure cookers were not expensive, but the black powder (a low explosive)
would be.
The defendant said that the brothers in Boston (a reference to the Boston Marathon
bombers) paid four hundred dollars for the amount of fireworks they used.
The defendant told CW-1 that he knew how to build the bombs and that other
components were also necessary: Nails and things like that.
also have aerosol cans and propane tanks to maximize explosive power.
And I
the ignition of the bomb, the defendant said that [t]he timer is already built in, it heats up and
builds up pressure. The defendant said that he would handle acquisition of the ignition source.
During the July 2, 2015 instant messaging chat, the defendant said that The big thing is
guns.
After CW-1 responded that he may be able to help, the defendant said, What I am
to stay around here akhi [Arabic for brother]. CW-1 said that AK-47s (a type of assault rifle)
are hard to get.
The defendants response was, If they are hard to get but you can get
something else easier then get the easier one You still have the list akhi? The defendant
confirmed that his list for guns included four handguns and two assault rifles.
CW-1 asked
whether CW-1 could assist the defendant in getting a ride to acquire the black powder, and the
defendant said, You get the rifles.
He explained
that the other place was a cafeteria at the college he had mentioned and that the target place was
Very sinful and has a crowd. The defendant also said that it was a favorable place to get out
of, suggesting that he was also considering the escape routes.
their roles in the preparation for the attack, and the defendant said, You get the rifles, Ill get the
6
powder.
The next day, on July 3, 2015, FBI JTTF agents observed the defendant purchase a
pressure cooker at the Walmart in North Adams, Massachusetts.
The
indicating that the defendant purchased a pressure cooker, as well as a copy of the store video.
A review of that video confirmed that the defendant purchased a pressure cooker.
On July 3, 2015, after his trip to Walmart the defendant communicated again with CW-1
via an instant messaging chat.
During the chat, the defendant told CW-1 that he had purchased
a pressure cooker: Allahu Akbar!!![Arabic phrase for God is great] I got the pressure
cookers today. Alhamdulillah. The defendant also said that he had already made ten
firebombs.
5.
On July 4, 2015, the defendant took into his possession the following four firearms that he
had previously ordered from CW-1:
.223 Colt AR-15 rifle,
556 Sig Arms SG550 rifle,
9mm Glock 17 handgun, and
10mm Glock 20 handgun.
A photograph of the firearms is attached as Exhibit A.
6.
The defendant was arrested on July 4, 2015, as he was carrying the two rifles and two
handguns back to his residence at Apartment C, 10 Murray Street, Adams, Massachusetts.
During the subsequent execution of a federal search warrant at the defendants residence, FBI
7
JTTF agents found several partially constructed Molotov Cocktails which the defendant had told
CW-1 he was building. These incendiary devices contained what appeared to be shredded
Styrofoam soaking in motor oil, which the defendant had told CW-1 would cause the fire from the
exploded devices to stick to peoples skin and make it harder to put the fire out. Agents also
found two machetes and a long curved knife in the defendants apartment.
7.
After the defendant was arrested, he waived his Miranda rights and spoke to FBI Special
Agents Paul Ambrogio and Julia Cowley. The defendant refused to talk about the guns with
which he was arrested but he reaffirmed his support for ISIL.
8.
After he was arrested, the defendant was taken to the Franklin County House of Correction.
During the defendants processing into the facility he met with a nurse for routine medical
screening. During his meeting with the nurse, the defendant grabbed a pen and forcefully stabbed
the nurse in the head, leaving a bloody hole in the nurses skin and causing the pen to break in half.
A photograph of the head wound caused by the defendant is attached as Exhibit B.
9.
Legal Standard
Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, pretrial detention is required if the Court finds that Ano
condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as
required and the safety of any other person and the community.@ 18 U.S.C. ' 3142(e). The
judicial officer must find either (1) by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant is a danger
to the community or (2) by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant poses a risk of
flight. 18 U.S.C. ' 3142(f).
Title 18, United States Code, Section 3142(g) outlines factors permitted to be considered
by the judicial officer in determining whether to order pre-trial detention:
[I]n determining whether there are conditions of release that will
reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the
safety of any other person and the community, [the judicial officer
shall] take into account the available information concerningB
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(A)
(B)
At the detention hearing, Athe rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials
do not apply to the presentation and consideration of information . . . . @
10.
The defendant must be detained pending his trial because there are no conditions or
combination of conditions that will reasonably assure the safety of the community and/or the
appearance of the defendant as required.
a.
The defendant is charged with the serious crime of possessing firearms after previously
being convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. He possessed
two rifles, two handguns, several partially constructed Molotov Cocktails, two machetes and a
large knife. He intended to use the firearms and Molotov Cocktails to commit acts of domestic
terrorism.
ii.
The weight of the evidence strongly supports the likelihood of conviction. The evidence
of the defendant=s crime is overwhelming, including audio and video recordings of his own
statements in support of ISIL, his domestic terrorism plans, his desire to obtain firearms and his
receipt of those firearms.
iii.
Criminal History.
As set forth above, the defendant has previously been convicted of operating a motor
vehicle under the influence of alcohol. The night of his arrest he stabbed an innocent nurse in the
head while she was carrying out her official duties.
(2)
Character.
The defendant supports ISIL and was making plans to commit acts of domestic terrorism,
including killing large numbers of innocent people. After his arrest he stabbed the first innocent
person he encountered.
10
(3)
Other factors.
Because no pretrial services report has yet been issued, the government is unable to assess
fully the defendant=s physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, residence in the
community, and financial resources.
b.
The defendant poses a serious risk of flight because as a supporter of ISIL he has planned
acts of domestic terrorism and taken steps to implement those attacks. Then he attacked one of
the first innocent people he met after he was arrested with the weapon most accessible to him.
Given the defendants determination to commit acts of violence in support of ISIL there are no
conditions which would ensure that he would not flee to continue his attacks and to avoid being
sent to federal prison.
11.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, the defendant should be detained pending trial because he poses a
danger to the community and is a risk of flight.
Respectfully submitted,
CARMEN M. ORTIZ
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By:
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
July 13, 2015
I hereby certify that the foregoing was filed by ECF and will be sent electronically to the
registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Kevin ORegan
Kevin ORegan
Assistant U.S. Attorney
12