Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adolescent Aggression and Parental Behaviour: A Correlational Study
Adolescent Aggression and Parental Behaviour: A Correlational Study
Abstract: The study was designed to examine the relationship between aggression of adolescents and their
parental behavior. A sample of 155 adolescent students (80 Boys and 75 Girls) was taken from the different
Senior Secondary schools of District Gurdaspur affiliated to CBSE. Aggression was measured by Aggression
Scale (Pal and Naqvi, 1983) and Parental Behaviour was measured by Multi Dimensional Parenting Scale
(Chauhan and Khokhar, 1997). The results show that there is significant positive correlation between
aggression among adolescents and deviant parental behaviour. Findings of the study revealed that parents show
more deviant parenting towards girls in comparison to boys in some of the dimensions. The results also throw
some light on gender differences in aggressive behavior of adolescents.
Keywords: Adolescence, Aggression, Parental Behavior.
I.
Introduction
Aggressive and violent behavior by one human being towards another is not a new phenomenon. It
was prevalent among our hunter ancestors thousands years ago and it is still prevalent almost in every
society today. The prevalence of aggressive and violent behavior among adolescents today is sufficient to
make it a social problem worthy of attention around the world. Aggression is a set of behavior that is likely
to, or has the potential to cause harm to others or intended to cause harm and are goal directed(Berkowitz,
1993). Aggression can be expressed in seven different forms according to Myer (1988) including: Predatory,
Inter male fear induced, Irritable anger, Territorial, Maternal/Paternal, and Instrumental. In terms of positive and
negative value, aggression can also be classified into two types i.e. Hostile Aggression and Instrumental
Aggression. Hostile aggression (Reactive aggression) is conceived as impulsive, thoughtless, springs from anger
and provides injury to others. Instrumental aggression can be understood as a drive or motivation, as it is
proactive and is conceived as premeditated means to obtain some goal (Berkowitz, 1993 and Geen, 2001).
Hostile aggression is "hot" and instrumental aggression is "cool". There are some factors affecting aggression
which can be classified into three broad categories like Person-centered (when root of aggression resides within
an individual), Situation centered (when root of aggression resides in environment) and Interaction centered
(when root of aggression arises due to the interaction of both the above forces).
Under the modern materialistic pressure, the world appears to be going towards a kind of chaos and
confusion. Moreover feelings of malice, mutual suspicion, jealousy and hatred are prevailing everywhere.
Its foremost attack is adolescence age. Adolescence is the most important period of human life. It is that
span of years during which boys and girls move from childhood to adulthood mentally, emotionally,
socially and physically. This period has been portrayed as a period of emotional turmoil. Instead of
adjusting passively to obstacles by developing defeatist attitudes, many adolescents react aggressively
towards the source of frustration. Adolescent Aggression has been defined as a harmful behavior which
violates social conventions and which may include behavioral traits like deliberate intention to harm and injure
another individual or object. Adolescents behavioral traits are markedly influenced by the parenting or the
environment he receives at home.
II.
Parenting is a complex activity that includes many specific behaviours that work individually and
together to influence child behaviour. The parenting style construct is used to capture neural variations in
parent's attempt to control and socialize their children. Parents are care takers, concerned about their child's
safety and want their child to grow up to be happy, healthy and responsible. Parents think that they should guide
their children in every venture whereas adolescents think that parents should not interfere in their affairs as they
are mature enough to take care of everything. This causes conflict between them and give birth to the frustration
in children. Baumrind (1971) found convincing links between parental behaviour and effect on children.
Adolescents are strongly influenced by their parents. The quality of parent - adolescent relationship is
perhaps the most important single determinant of adolescents attitude and behavior. Mostly the parents
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20732227
www.iosrjournals.org
22 | Page
III.
Dornbusch, Ritter, Leiderman, Roberts, & Fraleigh (1970) found that most of the behaviour
problems in children are usually caused by their parents behaviour. Barber, Chadwich & Oerter (1992) and
Rudo & Doulop (1998) found that adolescents who perceived their parents to be authoritarian demonstrated
more overall aggressive behaviour. Adolescents exposed to aggression and violence in their homes were at
greater risk for developing behavioural problems. The top five causes of indiscipline identified by teachers were
family problems, disinterest of parents towards children's education, parents negative attitude towards children,
effects of violence presented in television and over- crowded classrooms. Corvo & Williams (2000) found a
negative correlation between parental involvement and behavioural problems such as aggression and
violence. Grych (2002) studied that inter-parental conflict has a negative influence on adolescents and found
relationship between externalizing behaviour problems like aggression, academic achievement and interparental conflict. Phares & Epps (2004) described the relationship between the aspects of family functioning and
young adults pattern of anger expression and found that people from more negative expressive families
reported higher level of negative self-expression. Siegler, Deloache & Eisenberg (2006) claimed that
permissive parenting correlates to childrens impulsive behaviour and low levels of self control. Gulati &
Dutta (2008) examined inter-parent marital effect and other poverty related risk factors on the psychological
adjustment of adolescents. Inter-parent discord was significantly associated with all forms of conduct disorders
among children. Families multiple risk status showed significant correlation with both internal and external
categories of behaviour problems in adolescents.
Gecas (1971) indicated that children who are given freedom and autonomy are more likely to explore
their surrounding world, facilitating the development of competence, thus positively influencing the childs self
esteem. Zuckhew (1980) found that parental warmth, use of praise and encouragement to do work, motivates the
child towards higher achievement and success.
Baumrind (1991), Greenberg, Speltz & DeKlyen (1993) and Nassar-McMillan (1997) indicated that
children who experienced authoritative parenting grow to be socially responsible, assertive, and competent and
display self control resulting in less problematic behaviours. On the other hand Weiss, Dodge, Bates & Pettit
(1992) and Vissing, Straus, Geller, & Harrop (1991) emphasized that parents who rely on aggression in the form
of physical discomfort to manage their childs behavior are far more likely to have aggressive children than
parents who use more positive strategies. They found parental behavior such as arguing; threatening, yelling can
also be viewed as aggressive and will encourage a child to deal with frustration in the same way. Even in the
absence of physical aggression, verbal aggression in parents has been linked to aggression in children.
Neuro-developmental research (Glaser, 2000; Schwarz & Perry, 1994) suggests that child abuse and
neglect can affect brain development at critical and sensitive periods. Abuse and maltreatment of children
through a parents high aggressive behaviours can have lasting effects on a childs cognitive, emotional,
behavioural, and interpersonal functioning (Glaser, 2000).
Susan (2008) reported that parents are vitally important throughout a childs life as source of love and
security, as teachers and as role models but they are particularly important in the earliest years. Paradis,
Reinherz, Giaconia, Beardslee, Ward & Fitzmaurice (2009) found the impact of family arguing and physical
violence is long standing, with implications for adult functioning years later.
Men have been involved in an aggressive act in public environments more often than women because
women are not as comfortable displaying this behavior out in the community (Frieze & Li, 2010). In contrast
women typically display relational aggression, which is similar to indirect aggression because it is more passive
(Rhys & Bear, 1997). It has been seen that young girls tend to model their mothers behaviour, who attempt to
display little or no signs of overt aggression (Campbell, 1994). Because of this modeling, young girls
disassociate femininity with overt aggression.
Some of the studies claimed that permissive parenting correlates to childrens impulsive behavior that
leads to low levels of self control. On the other hand other studies show that parental involvement, parental care
and positive attitude towards children are negatively related with aggression among adolescents and some have
concluded that high aggressive behavioural patterns are responsible for aggression and anti-social behaviour
among adolescents. Keeping in mind the above stated literature this study was conducted to assess the
relationship between the Adolescent Aggression and Parental Behaviour. It was hypothesized that there will be a
significant relationship between the adolescent Aggression and parental behaviour..
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20732227
www.iosrjournals.org
23 | Page
Method
IV.1. Sample: The study was conducted on a sample of 155 adolescents (80 boys and 75 girls) studying in
+1 standard of secondary schools affiliated to C.B.S.E of District Gurdaspur. The technique of purposive
sampling was used.
IV.2. Description of Tools
IV.2. (i) Aggression Scale (Pal and Naqvi, 1983): This test consists of 30 statements and each statement
describes different forms of individuals aggression in different situations. Each of the items has six
alternatives, such as, very much, much, ordinary, less, very less, not at all and the answers are graded on 5
point scale. There is no time limit for the test. The reliability and validity coefficients reported by the
authors were 0.82 and 0.74 respectively which shows that scale is highly reliable and valid.
IV.2. (ii) Multi Dimensional Parenting Scale (Chauhan and Khokhar, 1997): This scale consists of 56
statements for seven areas of parenting which include seven negative and seven positive dimensions. It is a
5 point rating verbal scale that can be administered individually as well as in groups. It has measures for
parents on the two dimensions (i.e. positive and negative). There is no time limit.
V.
The purpose of the present investigation was to study the gender differences and adolescent
aggression in relation to parental behaviour. In order to achieve the objective of the study, the results
were discussed in terms of:
1. Comparison of Means
2. Correlation Analysis
V.1 Comparison of Means
In order to find out significant difference between aggression of boys and girls, univariatet test
was used. Table No. 1 shows the means and standard deviations of boys and girls along with the
statistical significance of difference between means. The results can be interpreted as: 1. There is no significant difference between boys (M=91.01) and gir ls (M=90.25) on the measure of
aggression. It means that boys and girls are equally aggressive. The present study is in contradiction
to many earlier studies such as Eagly and Chaiken (1993) and Frieze and Li (2010) who found that
men are more likely to engage in and display aggressive behaviour than women.
2. It is also evident from the results that there are significant di fferences in the Parental Behaviour
towards boys and girls with regard to negative dimensions i.e. like B (Hate), J (Submission), N
(Dependency) and positive dimensions like E (Acceptance), G (Progressiveness), I (Democratism).
On all these dimensions girls have scored higher than b oys. It indicates that inspite of showing
positive values like Acceptance, Progressiveness and Democratism towards girls; parents have also
shown some faulty value assumptions like Dependency, Submission and Hate. Because of high
scores on negative dimensions, parental behaviour can be termed as deviant parenting towards
girls in comparison to boys.
Table No. 1. Means, Standard Deviations,t-ratios along with Level of Significance
(Boys: N=80; Girls: N=75)
VARIABLES
Aggression
Parental Behaviour
Love (A)
Hate (B)
Encouragement (C)
Rejection (D)
Acceptance (E)
Autocratism (F)
Progressiveness (G)
Discouragement (H)
Democratism (I)
Submission (J)
Independency (K)
Conservatism (L)
Dominance (M)
Dependency (N)
BOYS
Mean
S.D.
91.01
14.42
GIRLS
Mean
S.D.
90.25
17.27
18.55
14.89
13.45
15.57
12.49
12.48
9.64
11.49
7.22
6.14
6.15
5.37
4.20
3.46
19.09
16.79
12.55
14.40
14.44
13.97
10.87
11.47
9.60
7.38
6.75
5.89
3.77
4.21
6.11
4.61
3.62
5.02
4.32
3.40
3.42
3.49
2.27
2.56
2.25
1.89
2.74
1.71
6.3
3.97
3.17
4.45
4.04
3.67
3.48
4.02
3.41
2.62
2.05
1.81
2.65
1.19
t-value
Significance level
0.296
N.S
.533
2.767
1.644
1.545
2.895
2.592
2.216
.024
5.089
2.983
1.717
1.742
.993
3.200
N.S.
0 .01
N.S.
N.S.
0 .01
N.S.
0 .05
N.S.
0 .01
0.01
N.S.
N.S.
N.S.
0. 01
www.iosrjournals.org
24 | Page
Aggrs.
.137
.052
.008
.071
.142
.155
.106
.196
.247*
.027
.124
.024
.070
.045
.172
.112
.139
.048
.073
.094
.436**
.055
.118
.044
.093
.076
.267*
.037
.103
.086
.151
.279*
.281*
.052
.117
.056
.108
.052
.254
.023
.180
.084
.085
.063
.053
.064
.032
.019
.030
.120
.142
.308
.090
.020
.070
.004
.132
.074
.223*
.107
.165
.006
.069
.219
.124
.289**
.039
.181
.128
.184
.143
.034
.091
.157
.254*
.059
.009
.056
.098
.195
.144
.314**
.014
.87
.141
.158
.203
.171
.020.
.165
.057
.053
.015
.009
.173
.285*
.266*
.069
.127
.134
.004
.147
.249*
.057
.169
Aggrs.
.084
.043
.041
.129
.120
.63
.014
.215
.009
.17
.112
.051
.261*
.084
.236*
.183
.039
.190
.315**
.015
.217
.140
.124
.055
.63
-.007
.183
.171
.229*
.343**
.272*
.027
.268*
.134
.010
.103
.03
.04
.098
.180
.174
.130
.129
.200
.086
.009
.022
.258
.049
.084
.286*
.018
.010
.144
.336*
.142
.279*
.187
.034
.143
.561**
.125
.289*
.260*
.026
.003
.063
.0113
.032
.106
.135
.099
.159
.092
.081
.098
.122
.084
.003
.253*
.249*
.042
.054
.066
.135
.021
.207
.94
.039
.037
.150
.188
.025
.171
.156
.364
.158
.007
.061
.094
.108
.026
.039
.038
.002
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20732227
www.iosrjournals.org
25 | Page
Educational implications
Children with severe aggression require the intervention of a mental health specialist to teach children
how to manage their aggressive behavior. Aggressive children are often spanked or get other forms of physical
punishment from their parents and teachers. It is best to stop using this discipline option. Verbal aggression can
have the same negative impact on aggressive behavior as spanking. Children respond to frustration with a calm
voice and respectful requests, when they model that type of response as well. If child seems to become even
more agitated when tried to help them calm down, then he/se should simply be left alone. Many parents
unknowingly reinforce their childs aggressive behavior. One way that aggressive behavior may be
unintentionally reinforced is through rough play. It is often during rough play the child gets in trouble for being
aggressive. For these children, such roughhousing should be eliminated for a period of time. More appropriate
ways to encourage childs physical activity include riding bikes, going for walks, shooting baskets, or joining
karate classes. Parents and teachers are required to use these types of strategies to help them to channelize their
pent up energy and to check their aggressive behavior.
VI.
Conclusion
External and internal factors are responsible for aggression among adolescents. Aggressive behavior
among boys is related with freedom provided to them and aggressive behavior among girls is linked with
dominant attitude of parents. So there is a joint responsibility of parents and teachers to control these factors and
helping the students to overcome their problems. The parents and teachers should act intelligently to give free
and consensual environment to the adolescents so that their personality can develop in a smooth manner.
Parents less effective and less intelligent acts may darken their future and ultimately the future of nation. Thus,
aggression has dangerous consequences not only for those who aggressed but also for those who aggress,
that is those who cause harm to the victim and at the same time breakdown their own personality. So there
is a great need to study the aggressive behaviour of adolescents and its root causes.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
[23].
Asksoy, R. P. (1999). Self-liking, self-competence, and the quest for self verification. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulleting, 25(10), 1230-1244.
Barber, B. Chadwich, B. & Oerter, R. (1992). Parental behaviours and adolescent self-esteem in the United States and Germany.
Journal of Marriage and the Family. 54, 128-141.
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Development Psychology Monograph, 4, 1-103.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting styles on adolescent competence and substance abuse. Journal of Early
Adolescence, 11, 56-95.
Berkowitz, L.B. (1993). Aggression: Causes, consequences and control. McGraw Hill New York.
Campbel, H. (1994) Regulation and Crises in New Zealand Agriculture: The case of Ash Burton Country, 1984-92, unpublished
PhD theses.
Chauhan, N. S. & Khokhar, C. P. (1997). Multi Dimensional Parenting Scale (MDP-Scale). MAAPA-Publications, Meerut.
Corvo, K. & Williams, K. (2000). Substance abuse, parenting styles, and aggression: An exploratory study of weapon
carrying students. Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education, 46, 1-13.
Dekovic, M. (1999). Parent adolescent conflict: Possible determinants and consequences. International Journal of
Behavioural Development, 23, 977-1000.
Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, H., Roberts, D. E., and Fraleigh, M. J. (1970). The relation of parenting style of
adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58, 1944-1257.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993).The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Frieze, I. H., & Li, M. Y. (2010). Gender, aggression and prosocial behavior. In Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology (pp.
311-335). Springer, New York.
Gecas, V. (1971). Parental behaviour and dimensions of adolescent self-evaluation. Sociometry. 34, 466-482.
Geen, R. G. (2001). Human Aggression. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Glaser, D. (2000). Child abuse and neglect and the braina review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 41(1), 97-116.
Greenberg, M. T., Speltz, M. L., & DeKlyen, M. (1993). The role of attachment in the early development of disruptive
behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 191-213.
Grych, S. (2002). Child appraisals of interpersonal conflict and behavioural adjustment during family dissolution. Hofstra
University.
Gulati, J. K. and Dutta, J. (2008). Risk, Conflict between parents and child adjustment in families experiencing persistent
poverty in India. Journal of Family Studies, 14(1),107-123.
Myers, David. G. (1988). Social Psychology. B & Jo Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., Singapore.
Nassar-McMillan, S.C.C., C.S.(1997). Building self-esteem of children and adolescents through adventure-based
counseling. Humanistic Education and Development , 36-59-67.
Pal, R. & Naqvi, T. (1983). Aggression Scale (A-Scale). Agra Psychological Research Cell, Tiwari Kothi, Belanganj, Agra-282004.
Paradis, A. D., Reinherz, H. Z., Giaconia, R. M., Beardslee, W. R., Ward, K. & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2009). Long-term impact of
family arguments and physical violence on adult functioning at age 30 years: Findings from the Simmons Longitudinal Study. J Am
Acad. Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 4, 290-298.
Phares, V. and Epps, J. (2004).The relationship between parental anger and behaviour problems in children and adolescents.
Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 209-227.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20732227
www.iosrjournals.org
26 | Page
Rhys, G. S. & Bear, G. G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relations: Gender and developmental issues. MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 43(1), 87106.
Rudo, F. & Doulop, K. (1998). The role of attachment in the early development of disruptive behaviour problems.
Development and Psychopathology, 5, 191-213.
Schwarz, E. D., & Perry, B. D. (1994). The post-traumatic response in children and adolescents. Psychiatric Clinics of
North America, 17, 311-326.
Siegler, R., Deloache, K., & Eisenberg, N. (2006). An Introduction to child development. Worth Publishers New York..
Susan, N. (2008). The role of attachment in the early development of disruptive behaviour problems. Development and
Psychopathology, 5, 191-215.
Vissing Y. M., Straus, M. A., Geller, R. J. & Harrop, J. W. (1991).Verbal aggression by parents and psychosocial problems of
children. Child Abuse Negl.,15, 223-238.
Weiss, B., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E. & Pettit, G. S. (1992). Some consequences of early harsh discipline: Child aggression and a
maladaptive social information processing style. Child Development., 63,1321-1335.
Zuckhew, R. (1980). Parental influences of adolescents self-esteem. Journal Early Adolescents, 4, 259, 274.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20732227
www.iosrjournals.org
27 | Page