Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 17

1
2
3
4
5
6

Gregory P. Goonan (California Bar Number 119821)


THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone: (858) 750-1615
Facsimile: (619) 243-0088
Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Right Connection, Inc.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

10
11

Right Connection, Inc., a Nevada corporation,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
Robert L. McGinley, an individual,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 15 CV 1323 BTM JMA


FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR (1)
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT; (2)
VIOLATION OF LANHAM ACT SECTION
43(a); (3) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE
SECTION 17200; (4) COMMON LAW
UNFAIR COMPETITION; (5) COMMON
LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT;
AND (6) FRAUD.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
I/C Judge: Hon. Berry T. Moskowitz
Courtroom: 15B
Action Filed: June 16, 2015

23
24
25

Plaintiff Right Connection, Inc. (Right Connection) alleges as follows for its
First Amended Complaint:
INTRODUCTION

26
27

1.

This is an action for damages, injunctive relief, and other relief arising

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
1

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 2 of 17

out of the infringement by defendant Robert L. McGinley (Defendant) of Right

Connections trademark rights as well as a violation by Defendant of Lanham Act

section 43(a) and state and common law unfair competition and trademark laws.

Right Connection is a company that specializes in the marketing and sale

of tours, travel, cruises and related services and products for individuals interested in

alternative adult travel and entertainment.

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

2.

3.

An essential part of Right Connections business is the trademarks and

trade names that it uses to market and sell its services and products. Right

Connection markets and sells its services and products using a number of trademarks

10

centered around the term Lifestyles. As alleged herein, the term Lifestyles has

11

come to be known and understood by consumers and Right Connections competitors

12

to designate the high-quality services and products marketed and sold by Right

13

Connection.

14

4.

Among a number of trademarks that it owns and uses in connection with

15

its business, Right Connection is the owner of United States Trademark Registration

16

No. 4,627,561 for the trademark Lifestyles Travel. Right Connection also owns

17

United States Trademark Registration No. 4,034,177 for the trademark Lifestyles

18

Cruise. These trademarks are sometimes referred to herein as Right Connections

19

Lifestyles Trademarks.

20

5.

Defendant is using websites operated and maintained at the following

21

domain addresses to offer for sale and sell tours, travel, cruises and related services

22

and products for individuals interested in alternative adult travel and entertainment:

23

(a) www.lifestylesholidays.com; (b) www.lifestylesconvention.com; and (c)

24

www.lifestyles.org. The websites operated and maintained at such domain names are

25

referred to herein as the Offending Websites. Right Connection is informed and

26

believes and on that basis alleges that Defendant is operating and maintaining the

27

Offending Websites for and on his own behalf, and/or the Offending Websites are

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
2

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 3 of 17

being operated and maintained by others acting in concert and participation with

Defendant and in conspiracy with Defendant.

As alleged herein, Defendants conduct constitutes trademark

infringement under federal, California and common law, violates Lanham Act section

43(a), and constitutes unfair competition under California and common law. Right

Connection accordingly brings this action to secure relief under federal, California

and the common law to redress and remedy Defendants wrongful acts. By this

action, Right Connection seeks injunctive relief, money damages and all other

appropriate relief.

10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

6.

7.

On February 15, 2011, in exchange for valuable consideration,

11

Defendant executed a written assignment (the Assignment) by which Defendant

12

assigned to Right Connection all right, title and interest in and to the following

13

trademark registrations: (1) United States Trademark Registration No. 2,008,780 for

14

the trademark Lifestyles Tours and Travel, and (2) United States Trademark

15

Registration No. 3,467,869 for the trademark Lifestyle Resorts. These trademarks

16

are referred to herein as Assigned Trademarks.

17

8.

Defendant has filed a Counterclaim in this action by which he claims

18

that the Assigned Trademarks are generic and/or are the victims of genericide. If the

19

allegations of Defendants Counterclaim are to be believed, Defendant knew or

20

believed that the Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the victims of genericide

21

as of the date he executed the Assignment.

22

9.

Defendant did not disclose, and concealed from Right Connection, that

23

he believed that the Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the victims of

24

genericide at the time he executed the Assignment, and that he would contend that the

25

Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the victims of genericide if Right

26

Connection sued him for infringing the Assigned Trademarks.

27

10.

The information that was not disclosed and that was concealed by

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
3

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 4 of 17

Defendant was material information that Defendant had a duty to disclose to Right

Connection. By failing to do so, Defendant has committed fraud by concealment.

3
4

11.

damages from Defendant to remedy his fraud.


JURISDICTION AND VENUE

5
6

12.

This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to (i) 28 U.S.C.

1331 (action arising under the laws of the United States); (ii) 28 U.S.C. 1338(a)

(action arising under trademark law); (iii) 28 U.S.C. 1338(b) (claims for unfair

competition joined with claims under the trademark law); (iv) 15 U.S.C. 1121(a)

10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

By this action, Right Connection also seeks compensatory and punitive

11
12

(action arising under the Lanham Act); (v) and principles of pendant jurisdiction.
13.

a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred.
THE PARTIES

13
14

Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) where

14.

Plaintiff Right Connection is a corporation organized and existing under

15

the laws of the State of Nevada with its principal place of business at 2375 East

16

Tropicana, Suite 172, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119. Right Connection is the owner of

17

all right, title and interest in and to the Lifestyles Trademarks and the Assigned

18

Trademarks.

19

15.

Right Connection is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that

20

Defendant McGinley is an individual who has done business at 1028 North

21

Mayflower Street, Anaheim, California at all relevant times.


GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

22
23

A.

Right Connections Business And Trademark Rights

24

16.

For many years, Right Connection has been in the business of arranging

25

and selling travel and tours, as well as other products and services, for individuals

26

interested in alternative adult travel and adults-only vacations.

27

17.

Right Connection is a leader in the alternative adult travel and

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
4

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 5 of 17

entertainment industry. Although there are numerous individuals and businesses who

are involved in the adult travel and entertainment industry, many of them are shady

operators who are unreliable, offer poor quality services, and in a number of cases

have defrauded consumers. In sharp contrast to many of its competitors, Right

Connection is well known both by consumers and by its competitors for the high

quality, honest, reliable travel and entertainment services, and related products and

services that it has provided to its customers over its many years of business.

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

18.

Right Connection has used the term Lifestyles in various forms as its

trademark for years to identify the high quality alternative adult travel and

10

entertainment services, and related products and services, it offers to its customers.

11

As a result, both consumers and Right Connections competitors have come to

12

recognize and understand that the term Lifestyles is a trademark owned by Right

13

Connection that designates the high quality, reliable alternative adult travel and

14

entertainment services, and other products and services, marketed and sold by Right

15

Connection.

16

19.

Right Connection has used the Lifestyles Trademarks, and the Assigned

17

Trademarks to advertise its alternative adult travel and entertainment services, and

18

related products and services, throughout the United States and the world. A

19

significant portion of Right Connections marketing and sales is done over the

20

Internet through the use of the Lifestyles Trademarks. Right Connection prominently

21

displays and uses its Lifestyles Trademarks on its websites and in its other marketing

22

and promotional materials.

23

20.

As a result of the substantial amount of sales that Right Connection has

24

generated using the Lifestyles Trademarks, the Assigned Trademarks, the length of

25

use of such trademarks, the advertising and promotion of such trademarks by Right

26

Connection, and the public recognition of such trademarks, as well as the high

27

quality, honest and reliable services offered and sold by Right Connection using such

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
5

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 6 of 17

trademarks, the Lifestyles and Assigned Trademarks are widely understood and

recognized in the alternative adult travel and entertainment industry as being Right

Connections trademarks, and the such trademarks distinguish Right Connections

superior services from the services of others.

For the reasons alleged herein, the Lifestyles Trademarks and the

Assigned Trademarks are valuable assets owned by Right Connection and have come

to represent significant and valuable goodwill belonging exclusively to Right

Connection.

9
10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

21.

11
12
13
14
15

22.

As alleged herein, Right Connection is the owner of United States

Trademark Registration No. 4,627,561 for the trademark Lifestyles Travel.


23.

As alleged herein, Right Connection also owns United States Trademark

Registration No. 4,034,177 for the trademark Lifestyles Cruise.


24.

Each of the Lifestyles Trademarks as described herein have been valid

and subsisting at all relevant times.


25.

As alleged herein, Right Connection is the owner of United States

16

Trademark Registration No. 2,008,780 for the trademark Lifestyles Tours and

17

Travel.

18
19
20
21

26.

As alleged herein, Right Connection is the owner of United States

Trademark Registration No. 3,467,869 for the Trademark Lifestyle Resorts.


27.

Each of the Assigned Trademarks as described herein have been valid

and subsisting at all relevant times.

22

B.

Defendants Wrongful Acts

23

28.

As alleged herein, Defendant is using the Offending Websites, on his

24

own and/or in active concert, participation and conspiracy with others, to offer

25

alternative adult travel and entertainment services over the Internet.

26
27

29.

Right Connection is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges,

that Defendant has falsely represented to the consumers, and continues to falsely

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
6

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 7 of 17

represent to consumers, that Defendant, not Right Connection, owns trademark rights

in the Lifestyles Trademarks and to the Lifestyles name.

Defendants wrongful actions as alleged herein create a likelihood of

confusion and have created actual confusion among consumers, and present the risk

of deceiving the public into believing that Defendant has the right to use and/or owns

rights in the term Lifestyles in the adult travel and entertainment industry, when

that is not true.

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Trademark Infringement)

10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

30.

31.

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

11

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 29 of this First Amended

12

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

13
14
15

32.

This claim for relief is an action for federal trademark infringement

pursuant to the Federal Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114 et seq.


33.

As alleged herein, Right Connection has valid and subsisting federal

16

registrations for Right Connections Lifestyles Trademarks and Right Connection has

17

marketed, advertised and sold alternative adult travel services to the public using its

18

Lifestyles Trademarks for a number of years.

19

34.

As alleged herein, Right Connection is informed and believes and on

20

that basis alleges that the Defendant has marketed, advertised and sold, and continues

21

to market, advertise and sell, his own alternative adult travel and entertainment

22

services to the public using the Offending Websites and/or terms and formulations

23

that are confusingly similar to Right Connections Lifestyles Trademarks.

24

35.

Defendants wrongful acts as alleged herein have caused, and are likely

25

to continue to cause, confusion in the minds of consumers to the detriment of Right

26

Connection.

27

36.

Defendants wrongful acts as alleged herein were done without the

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
7

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 8 of 17

knowledge, consent or permission of Right Connection and continue without the

consent or permission of Right Connection.

In doing the things alleged herein, Defendant has violated the trademark

rights of Right Connection under the Federal Trademark Act, thereby giving rise to a

cause of action under 15 U.S.C. 1114.

38.

Right Connection will be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is

immediately and permanently enjoined from any further infringement of Right

Connections Lifestyles Trademarks.

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

37.

39.

Right Connection has no adequate remedy at law and serious damage to

10

its trademark rights will result unless Defendants wrongful acts and infringement are

11

enjoined by the court.

12

40.

Defendant has continued to infringe Right Connections Lifestyles

13

Trademarks notwithstanding that he has actual knowledge of Right Connections

14

trademark rights. Defendants infringement of Right Connections Lifestyles

15

Trademarks accordingly constitutes intentional, willful, knowing and deliberate

16

trademark infringement.

17

41.

Defendants infringement of Right Connections Lifestyles Trademarks

18

has caused Right Connection to suffer damages in an amount unknown at this time

19

and has caused Defendant to gain revenues and profit in an amount unknown at this

20

time. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), Right Connection is entitled to an award of

21

monetary damages in an amount equal to the losses suffered by Right Connection and

22

the revenues and/or profits gained by Defendant, which damages should be

23

augmented as provided by 15 U.S.C. 1117(a).

24
25
26
27

42.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), any monetary damages awarded to

Right Connection should be trebled.


43.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), Right Connection is entitled to an

award of attorneys fees and costs of suit.

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
8

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 9 of 17

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Violation of Lanham Act Section 43(a))

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 42 of this First Amended

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

6
7
8
9
10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

44.

45.

This claim for relief is for violation of Lanham Act section 43(a), 15

U.S.C. 1125(a).
46.

The wrongful actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute unfair

competition and false advertising in violation of Lanham Act section 43(a).


47.

Right Connection will be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is

11

enjoined from wrongful conduct as alleged herein, and from any further acts of unfair

12

competition and false advertising relating to Right Connections Lifestyles

13

Trademarks.

14
15
16

48.

Right Connection has no adequate remedy at law and serious damage to

its rights will result unless Defendants wrongful actions are enjoined by the court.
49.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute intentional, willful,

17

knowing and deliberate unfair competition and false advertising pursuant to Lanham

18

Act Section 43(a).

19

50.

Defendants acts of unfair competition and false advertising have caused

20

Right Connection to suffer damages in an amount unknown at this time and have

21

caused Defendant to gain revenues and profit in an amount unknown at this time.

22

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), Right Connection is entitled to an award of

23

monetary damages in an amount equal to the losses suffered by Right Connection and

24

the revenues and/or profits gained by Defendant, which damages should be

25

augmented as provided by 15 U.S.C. 1117(a).

26
27

51.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), any monetary damages awarded to

Right Connection should be trebled.

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
9

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 10 of 17

1
2

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), Right Connection is entitled to an

award of attorneys fees and costs of suit.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Violation of California B&P Code Section 17200 et seq.)

53.

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 51 of this First Amended

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

8
9
10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

52.

54.

This claim for relief is for unfair competition and false advertising in

violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.


55.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute unfair competition

11

and false advertising in violation of California Business and Professions Code section

12

17200 et seq.

13

56.

Right Connection will be irreparably harmed unless Defendants

14

wrongful conduct and any further acts of unfair competition and false advertising

15

relating to Right Connections Lifestyles Trademarks are enjoined by the court.

16
17
18
19
20

57.

Right Connection has no adequate remedy at law and serious damage to

its rights will result unless the Defendants wrongful conduct is enjoined by the court.
58.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute intentional, willful,

knowing and deliberate unfair competition and false advertising.


59.

Defendants acts of unfair competition and false advertising have caused

21

Defendant to gain revenues and profit in an amount unknown at this time. Pursuant

22

to California Business & Professions Code section 17203, Right Connection is

23

entitled to a disgorgement in an amount equal to the revenues and/or profits gained by

24

Defendant.

25
26
27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
10

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 11 of 17

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Common Law Trademark Infringement)

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 58 of this First Amended

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

61.

This claim for relief is for common law trademark infringement.

62.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute common law

8
9

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

60.

trademark infringement.
63.

Right Connection will be irreparably harmed unless Defendants

10

wrongful conduct and any further acts of trademark infringement relating to Right

11

Connections Lifestyles Trademarks are enjoined by the court.

12
13
14
15
16

64.

Right Connection has no adequate remedy at law and serious damage to

its rights will result unless the Defendants wrongful conduct is enjoined by the court.
65.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute intentional, willful,

knowing and deliberate trademark infringement.


66.

As a direct and proximate result of the acts of trademark infringement

17

alleged herein, Right Connection has suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages in

18

an amount unknown at this time. Likewise, as a direct and proximate result of the

19

acts of trademark infringement as alleged herein, Defendant wrongfully has gained

20

revenues and profit in an amount unknown at this time.

21

67.

Defendant committed the acts of trademark infringement alleged herein

22

intentionally, deliberately, maliciously, with intent to injure and oppress Right

23

Connection, and in conscious disregard of the rights of Right Connection. Right

24

Connection accordingly is entitled to an award of punitive and exemplary damages in

25

an amount sufficient to punish and deter Defendants and make him an example to

26

others.

27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
11

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 12 of 17

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Common Law Unfair Competition)

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 66 of this First Amended

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

69.

This claim for relief is for common law unfair competition.

70.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute common law

8
9

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

68.

unfair competition.
71.

Right Connection will be irreparably harmed unless Defendants

10

wrongful acts and any further acts of unfair competition relating to Right

11

Connections Lifestyles Trademarks are enjoined by the court.

12
13
14
15
16

72.

Right Connection has no adequate remedy at law and serious damage to

its rights will result unless the Defendants wrongful conduct is enjoined by the court.
73.

The actions of Defendant as alleged herein constitute intentional, willful,

knowing and deliberate unfair competition.


74.

As a direct and proximate result of the acts of unfair competition alleged

17

herein, Right Connection has suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages in an

18

amount unknown at this time. Likewise, as a direct and proximate result of the acts

19

of unfair competition as alleged herein, Defendant has wrongfully has gained

20

revenues and profit in an amount unknown at this time.

21

75.

Defendant committed the acts of unfair competition alleged herein

22

intentionally, deliberately, maliciously, with intent to injure and oppress Right

23

Connection, and in conscious disregard of the rights of Right Connection. Right

24

Connection accordingly is entitled to an award of punitive and exemplary damages in

25

an amount sufficient to punish and deter Defendant and make him an example to

26

others.

27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
12

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 13 of 17

SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Fraud)

Right Connection realleges and incorporates by this reference each and

every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 75 of this First Amended

Complaint as though set forth in full herein.

77.

This claim for relief is a claim for fraud under California law.

78.

On February 15, 2011, Defendant executed the Assignment by which

Defendant assigned to Right Connection all right, title and interest in and to the

Assigned Trademarks.

10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

76.

11
12

79.

Defendant has filed a Counterclaim in this action by which he claims

that the Assigned Trademarks are generic and/or are the victims of genericide.
80.

If the allegations of Defendants Counterclaim are to be believed,

13

Defendant knew or believed that the Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the

14

victims of genericide as of the date he executed the Assignment.

15

81.

Defendant did not disclose, and concealed from Right Connection, that

16

he believed that the Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the victims of

17

genericide at the time he executed the Assignment, and that he would contend that the

18

Assigned Trademarks were generic and/or the victims of genericide if Right

19

Connection sued him for infringing the Assigned Trademarks.

20

82.

The information that was not disclosed and that was concealed by

21

Defendant was material information that Defendant had a duty to disclose to Right

22

Connection. By failing to do so, Defendant has committed fraud by concealment.

23
24
25

83.

Defendant knew the information he intentionally failed to disclose and

concealed was material to Right Connection.


84.

Defendant did not disclose and concealed such material facts to induce

26

Right Connection to transfer valuable consideration to Defendant in exchange for the

27

Assignment.

28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
13

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 14 of 17

Right Connection was ignorant of the information that Defendant

concealed and failed to disclose, and actually and reasonably relied to its detriment on

its belief that Defendant had made full, complete and truthful disclosure of all

material information.

86.

Right Connection did not discover that Defendant had intentionally

failed to disclose and had concealed material information as alleged herein until

Defendant filed his Counterclaim in this action.

8
9

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

85.

87.

As a direct, proximate, and legal result of the non-disclosure and

concealment as alleged herein, Right Connection has suffered, continues to suffer,

10

and in the future will suffer, actual, consequential and incidental damages in an

11

amount according to proof at trial as alleged herein.

12

88.

Defendant did the acts and things alleged herein deliberately,

13

maliciously, with intent to injure and oppress Right Connection, and in conscious

14

disregard of the rights of Right Connection. Moreover, the conduct of Defendant

15

constitutes fraudulent, malicious, oppressive and/or despicable conduct. Right

16

Connection therefore is entitled to punitive and exemplary damages against

17

Defendant in an amount sufficient to punish and deter Defendant, according to proof

18

at trial.

19

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

WHEREFORE, Right Connection prays for judgment against Defendant as


follows:
1.

For a temporary, preliminary and permanent injunction restraining and

enjoining Defendant, and his agents, servants, employees, and all others in active
concert or participation with him, as follows:
a)

From further using the Lifestyles Trademarks;

27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
14

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 15 of 17

b)

From further infringing the Lifestyles Trademarks;

c)

From further advertising, promoting, distributing, offering for sale,

and/or selling, any travel services using the Lifestyles Trademarks or any other word

or phrase confusingly similar to Right Connections Lifestyles Trademarks.


d)

5
6

herein.
2.

For an award of damages suffered by Right Connection, plus any

revenues or profits earned by Defendant, as a result of Defendants trademark

infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising, in an amount to be proven at

10
THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP
5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

From further acts of false advertising and unfair competition as alleged

trial.

11

3.

12

allowed by law.

13

4.

14

For an award of augmented and treble damages to the maximum extent

For an award of punitive and exemplary damages in an amount to be

proven at trial but sufficient to punish and deter Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DATED: July 30, 2015

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Gregory P. Goonan


Gregory P. Goonan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Right Connection, Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
15

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 16 of 17

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

1
2

Plaintiff Right Connection, Inc., hereby demands a jury trial in this matter.

3
4
5
6

DATED: July 30, 2015

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP APC

7
8
9

By: /Gregory P. Goonan/


Gregory P. Goonan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Right Connection, Inc.

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
16

(15cv1323)

Case 3:15-cv-01323-BTM-JMA Document 7 Filed 07/30/15 Page 17 of 17

1
2
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 30th day of July 2015, a true and
accurate copy of the attached document was electronically filed with the Court, to be
served by operation of the Courts electronic filing system, upon the following:

4
5
6
7
8
9

Allan B. Gelbard, Esq.


The Law Offices of Allan B. Gelbard
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 801
Encino, CA 91436
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Robert L. McGinley

THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP


5755 Oberlin Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 750-1615

10
11
12

/s/ Gregory P. Goonan

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
17

(15cv1323)

You might also like