Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 1
Experiment 1
Co
NH3
NH 3
Cl
(b)
Cl
NH 3
NH 3
NH 3
[Co(NH 3) 6]Cl3
Cl
Figure 1-1 Jrgensen (a) and Werner (b) formulations of CoCl 3 (NH3 ) 6
The ease of precipitation of the three chloride ions by aqueous silver nitrate was explained away
by both camps: Werner had the correct idea, that the chloride ions were ionic and no bond needs
to be broken when solutions of this compound react with Ag+. Jrgensen argued that chloride
bound via the nitrogen chains was easily displaced, but chloride directly bound to the metal was
more strongly bound. It is easy in retrospect to ridicule Jrgensen's ideas, but they were fully
consistent with much of the evidence, and were patterned on the successful chain interpretation
of hydrocarbon compounds.
Where the two theories differed was in the formulations of isomers. Jrgensen accounted for
isomerism by altering the chain-lengths of the ammonia groups, as in the hydrocarbons. Werner
argued for isomerism based on the relative arrangement of groups around the central metal ion,
what we now know as stereoisomerism. Werner's theory predicted that there should be two
isomers of [CoCl2 (NH3 )4 ]Cl. One of these, the praseo form had been known since 1857. The
other proved very hard to pin down, due to the fact that it is very unstable and easily reverts to
the praseo form. The eventual isolation of the violeo isomer by Werner in 1907 led to
Jrgensen's final admission of the defeat of his theory.
Since these early controversies, in which a wholly unanticipated type of chemical structure was
deduced using only chemical techniques and the one physical technique of conductivity
measurements, Werner's theories have been placed on an absolutely certain basis by X-ray
crystal structures of coordination complexes. A wide variety of isomerism has been identified in
coordination complexes. In this lab we consider an example of ionization isomerism, and use IR
spectral and conductivity evidence to tell the isomers apart.
Page 1- 1
Experiment 1
Cl
H3 N
H3 N
NH 3
Cl-
Co
H3 N
Cl
NH 3
Cl
Praseo (i.e.trans)
Cl
Cl-
Co
H3 N
NH 3
NH3
Instructional goals:
Properties of the following elements are highlighted: Co, N, O, S and Br.
(1)
Experience with a classic synthetic sequence for a coordination complex, making use of
inert ligands and labile ligands, and controlled by the trans influence.
(2)
Understanding of ionization isomerism, and the reason this caused so much confusion
before Werner's theory was available.
(3)
Experience with the use of infrared spectroscopy to distinguish ionization isomers.
(4)
The use of group theory arguments to interpret infrared spectral bands in coordinated
small molecules.
Pre-lab exercise
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Write balanced equations for all the steps in part 1 and part 2 of the synthetic procedure.
Define precisely what is meant by ionizations isomerism. Sketch out the structures of the
two ionization isomers to be prepared in this lab. Why is the Werner theory so important
in distinguishing these ionization isomers?
To what point groups do the structures drawn in Question 2 belong? Consider only the
complex cations!
How will IR data distinguish between the two isomers? What chemical tests could one
perform to distinguish the two, if IR were not available?
What range of IR frequencies do you need to record to get the data required for this
experiment?
Map out the timing of your afternoons work. Use free gaps of time to do other
operations. Be realistic in the time allotted for each operation!
Procedure
Part 1: Preparation of [Co(NH3 )5 Cl)]Cl2 and [Co(NH3 )5 Br]Br2
Dissolve 8 grams of CoCl2 .6H2 O in 10 mL of water. Add this solution to an evaporating dish
containing a slurry of 25 g of NH4 Cl in 50 mL concentrated aqueous ammonia and stir well
using magnetic stirring. To the stirring solution add 5 mL of 30% H2 O2 drop wise(At this point
the colour of the solution should be chocolate brown).
Chemistry 3820 Laboratory Manual
Page 1- 2
Experiment 1
After all the peroxide has been added, place the evaporating dish on a steam bath in the hood.
Heat with occasional stirring for 15-30 minutes (do not allow to dry). The contents should be a
brownish thick slurry. Rinse the paste into a 250 mL beaker containing 100 mL of 3 M HCl and
heat the solution with stirring for 10 min. Allow to cool and filter the precipitate using a
Bchner funnel and trap. Wash the precipitate with three 10 mL portions of cold water,then
with three 10 mL portions of acetone, and suck dry.
Divide the precipitate into two parts,in 2:1 proportions. Place the smaller part into a 250 mL
beaker containing 100 mL of 2M ammonia (solution A), and the larger part into another 250 mL
beaker containing 200 mL of 2M ammonia (solution B). With constant stirring heat both
beakers to 50-60 C (no higher). After a short time all the precipitate will dissolve giving a deep
red solution which is filtered hot (Bchner funnel) through fine filter paper. Transfer each
solution to a 1L beaker and reheat to 50-60 C. To the solution B add three 50 mL portions of
concentrated HBr in 5 min. intervals, and to the other three 25 mL portions of HCl in 5 min.
intervals. (The temperature should be maintained at 50-60 C). Continue to heat and stir for an
additional 15 min., then cool to room temperature. Filter and wash B with three portions of 10
mL dilute (2M) HBr first and three portions of 5 mL acetone second. Filter and wash A with
three portions of 10 mL cold water and three portions of 5 mL acetone. Label and let both
precipitates dry for several days in a desiccator (over KOH).
Part 2: preparation of pentamminebromocobalt(III)sulfate and
pentamminesulfatocobalt(III)bromide.
Note: work on the two parts of this procedure side by side.
Preparation of pentamminebromocobalt(III) sulfate
Saturate 250 mL of 40-45 C water with [Co(NH3 )5 Br]Br2 . Filter it warm and add it slowly to 40
mL of concentrated HCl. Cool the solution in ice and filter the product,[Co(NH3 )5 Br]Cl2 , by
Bchner funnel, and wash the precipitate with three portions of cold 3M HCl, then ethanol until
the washings are acid free and leave to air dry. Take the dry material [Co(NH3 )5 Br]Cl2 and
dissolve it in small portions in concentrated H2 SO4 and notice the evolving of HCl gas. When no
more gas evolves, add 10 mL of cold water to the rapidly stirring semi-liquid mass. Heat on the
steam bath to 70 C so that most of the material dissolves. Filter the hot solution as quickly as
possible and cool in an ice bath. A small quantity of violet crystals of the product form, which
are filtered and washed with ethanol until the washings are acid free. Dry the product at ca. 100
C for two hours.
Preparation of pentamminesulfatocobalt(III) bromide.
Dissolve 1.0 g of the previously prepared [Co(NH3 )5 Cl]Cl2 in 2.5 mL concentrated H2 SO4 , the
amount of H2 SO4 should be almost 6 times the amount of [Co(NH3 )5 Cl]Cl2 , and heat on steam
bath for 10 min.
Page 1- 3
Experiment 1
Transfer the solution to a beaker containing 30 mL of cold water, and to the stirring solution
slowly add a mixture of 5.2 mL HBr in 20 mL water. Let the resulting red solution stand for 5
min. at room temperature, then very slowly, with stirring, add ethanol until a faint permanent
turbidity can be seen. Add a further 10 mL ethanol to precipitate the desired compound, then
filter and wash with ethanol until the washings are acid free and air dry.
Characterization
Measure the melting point of all 4 products. Calculate the percent yields and obtain their IR
spectra as mulls in Nujol and fluorolube, using the CsI plates. Caution: CsI plates are
extremely expensive (upwards of $100 per plate) and are moisture sensitive. Use them with
great caution, and always clean them immediately (with CH2 Cl2 , NOT acetone!) and return
to the desiccator for storage. Compare the data with literature values.
Report
Hand in your product as well as all original spectra. Discuss the IR spectra with respect to the
identification of the ionization isomerism. Present the results of your conductivity study to
confirm the assignments of the structures. Your Discussion should address at least the following
points:
1.
What is the structure of each isomer?
2.
Which ligands are observed in the IR spectra of the four complexes which you have
prepared? What are the symmetries of the ligands in each compound?
3.
Use group theoretical arguments to support your assignment of the ionization isomers.
4.
Discuss the base-hydrolysis mechanism as it relates to the purification step in Part I;
discuss the chemical principles used in the conversion of the purified complexes into the
products of Part II. Explain the origin of any mixtures observed in the products.
5.
Why do many cobalt complexes display isomerism?
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
Page 1- 4