Mary Ark Covenant
Mary Ark Covenant
By Steve Ray
The first topic I will tackle is your question: And could you explain more about why Mary is the Ark of the New
Covenant? This is a very exciting topic and quite a thrilling romp through the Old and New Testaments. Luke wove
marvelous things into his gospel that only a knowledgeable Jew would have understood at the time one who knew
the Jewish Scriptures and had ears to hear and eyes to see. When I am finished writing this section I will mail it to you
along with my video on Mary. In my video I discuss Mary as the fulfillment of the Old Testament type the Ark of the
Covenant on location in Israel.
I have added a lot of footnotes to add supporting information. You can ignore them or read them if you wish. They are
not necessary, only documentation in case you want or need it. I added them for your information and because I might
end up putting this on my website too.
Even though you probably already know this, let me explain typology so we have a foundation for understanding what
we will discover about Mary.
Understanding Typology
As you know, the Old Testament is overflowing with stories and people and history, many of which we call types. To me
this is very exciting stuff. A type is a person, a thing, or an event in the Old Testament which prefigures its fulfillment or
reality in the New Testament. In other words, it is like a picture which comes alive in a new and exciting way. The New
Testament fulfillments are always more glorious, more effective and more universal than their Old Testament types. As
St. Augustine said, the Old Testament is the New concealed, but the New Testament is the Old revealed. 1
Paul mentions types in his epistles. For an example Paul said Adam is a type of Christ. He wrote Nevertheless death
reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a
type of Him who was to come (Rom 5:14). As early as Paul, Christians understood that the Old Testament was full of
types which were fulfilled in the New Testament.
Lets look at a few other examples. Remember the slavery of the Israelites under the Pharaoh in Egypt? Egypt is a type
of the world, Pharaoh a type of the devil, and slavery a type of sin. Moses is a type of Christ who is raised up from
among his own people to rescue them like Jesus was raised up from among his own people to save them (Deut 18:15,
18; Jn 1:11-12). Jesus is the new Moses who leads us out of sin and slavery to the promised land of heaven.
Lets pursue it a little further. Jesus said we will see the kingdom of heaven only if we are born again of water and
Spirit (Jn 3:35). What could that mean? Well, what had Jesus just done? He had gone down into the water and the
Spirit had come down (Jn 1:28-32; Lk 3:21-22). By water and Spirit Jesus meant baptism, as all early Christians
taught. This was also the way the Israelites were saved from Egypt, slavery, and Pharaoh and formed into a new nation
they went down into the water of the Red Sea with the Spirit hovering over their heads in the form of a cloud and
leading the way. It is also the way the first creation came had its birth when the world was empty and void and the
Spirit of God hovered over the waters and from the waters rose land, and the dust from which man was made. God
always creates new things through water and Spirit. It was also how the new humanity started with Noah as he was
saved through water (with a dove hovering above) and Peter makes the parallel between the flood and baptism (1 Pet
3:18-21).
Paul recognizes Moses and the exodus from Egypt as true history, but also as a type a type of Christian baptism and
salvation. Notice what he says For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud
and all passed through the sea and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea and all ate the same spiritual
food [the manna, a type of the Eucharist] and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from a spiritual
rock which followed them; and the rock was Christ (1 Cor 10:1-4).
For more on this, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), 128130, 1094.
Peter uses Noahs Ark as a type of Christian baptism in 1 Peter 3:18-2, circumcision foreshadowed baptism (Col 2:1112), the bronze serpent was a type of the crucified Christ (Num 21:8-9; Jn 3:14), and the Passover Lamb prefigured
Christ (1 Cor 5:7). These are just a few of many examples of biblical typology. 2
Understanding the Ark of the Old Covenant
What I am about to write is not new to you. You already know about the Ark of the Old Covenant that was housed in the
Tabernacle in the wilderness of Sinai. Janet and I have studied all of this on location at Mount Sinai and it is fascinating!
To stand on the same holy ground where Moses stood and to see the open expanse of the wilderness where the first
Ark was constructed in the shadow of the holy mountain, it was truly breathtaking. 3
God loved his people and wanted to dwell among them. He chose to do so in a very special way. 4 He instructed Moses
to build a tabernacle surrounded by heavy curtains and within the tabernacle to place a golden Ark. The Ark was made
of acacia wood covered with gold. Within the Ark was placed a golden jar holding the manna, Aarons rod which
budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant (Heb 9:14). The Ark was covered with the mercy seat and with two golden
images of the magnificent cherubim who dwell in heaven (Ex 25:10-22).
When Moses had finished making the Ark and the tabernacle, the glory cloud of the Lord (the Shekinah Glory) covered
the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35; Num 9:18, 22). The verb to cover or
overshadow and the metaphor cloud are used in a special way in the Bible. They represent the presence and glory of
God. The spirit of God covered or overshadowed the Ark and the tabernacle and the glory of the Lord filled the
tabernacle.5
The Greek word for overshadow ( or episkiazein) in Exodus 40 is rarely used in the Greek Old
Testament.6 The Holy Spirit chooses his words carefully. Here it is used of the presence of God overshadowing the Ark.
The same Shekinah glory cloud also filled the Temple of Solomon (2 Chron 7:1-3).
The Holy Spirit Overshadows Mary
The very same Greek word for overshadow is used by Gabriel when he tells Mary that the Holy Spirit will
overshadow her and she will become pregnant. There is sexual imagery used here and the result of the overshadowing is
the presence of God in the womb of Mary, just like the presence of God dwelling in the Ark of the Covenant in the
tabernacle. I dont think the Holy Spirit chose to use the rarely used Greek word in both places without
purpose.
If someone reads Lukes gospel without thinking like a Jew or having a deep understanding the Old Testament and its
types and symbols, this interesting bit of information about the Ark and Mary would probably slip past them. Luke is
suggesting there is a parallel between the Old Testament Ark as the dwelling place of God and Mary as the new
dwelling of God, but this time God came to dwell upon the earth in the flesh.
People sometimes ask why God was so specific and careful about every exacting detail of the Ark (Ex 25 30). God
wanted it made for himself a place for him to dwell (Ex 25:8). God made it very clear that the word of God inscribed
on stone should be housed in a perfect container covered with pure gold within and without. How much more would
God prepare a very special woman to carry his holy and only begotten Son. Soon the Word of God in flesh would take
up residence in the womb of a human girl. Imagine how concerned God would be to prepare a perfect and flawless Ark
that would carry the Word of God enfleshed the Second Person of the Trinity. 7
2
The Virgin Mary is the living shrine of the Word of God, the Ark of the New and Eternal Covenant. In fact, St. Luke's account of the
annunciation of the angel to Mary nicely incorporates the images of the tent of meeting with God in Sinai and of the Temple of Zion. Just
as the cloud covered the people of God marching in the desert (cf. Nm 10:34; Dt 33:12; Ps 91:4) and just as the same cloud, as a sign of
the divine mystery present in the midst of Israel, hovered over the Ark of the Covenant (cf. Ex 40:35), so now the shadow of the Most
High envelops and penetrates the tabernacle of the new covenant that is the womb of Mary (cf. Lk 1:35) (The Shrine: Memory, Presence
and Prophecy of the Living God, May 8,1999 written by the Vaticans Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant
People).
Fifth, the place that housed the Ark for three months was blessed and in this short paragraph Elizabeth uses the word
blessed three times and their home was certainly blessed by the presence of the Ark and the Lord within.
Sixth, when the Old Testament Ark arrived and when Mary arrived they were both greeted with shouts of joy.
And the word for the cry of Elizabeths greeting is another rare Greek word. Its used in connection with Old Testament
liturgical ceremonies that were centered around the Ark and worship. 8 Luke again uses an uncommon word borrowed
from the Old Testament a word any good Jew would understand. Luke uses a word that would flip a light on in an
Jewish head.
Seventh, the Ark returns to its home and ends up in Jerusalem where Gods presence and glory is revealed in the Temple
(2 Sam 6:12; 1 Ki 8:9-11) and Mary returns home and eventually ends up in Jerusalem where she presents God
enfleshed in the Temple (Lk 1:56; 2:21-22)
Interestingly, at this moment, Mary bursts into inspired, poetic worship and says that all generations will call her
blessed. Many Christians hesitate to do this, but Catholics have called her blessed through the centuries. Also it is
interesting to notice that Marys prayer, the Magnificat (Lk 1:46-55), is based upon the prayer of Hannah (1 Sam 2:110). The late Pope John Paul II said Hannahs prayer was the biblical model for Marys song and was the Magnificat of
the Old Testament. It seems Mary was very well-versed in the Jewish Scripture.
Knowing the depth of Scripture, the Jewish nature of the Bible, and the use of biblical typology t seems pretty clear that
Luke has twice now revealed something of the person and place of Mary in the history of salvation and he did it in a
very clever manner. In the Ark of the Old Covenant, God came to his people with a spiritual presence, but in Mary the
Ark of the New Covenant God comes to dwell with his people not only spiritually, but physically in the womb of a
specially chosen and prepared Jewish girl.
Mary the Ark as Revealed in Marys Visit to Elizabeth
Golden Box: Ark of the Old Covenant
The Word Biblical Commentary says of Elizabeths crying out: Elizabeths intensity reflects her state of inspiration, , to cry
out, is used in the LXX (5 times) only in connection with the loud noise of worship. (Evans, C. (2002). Vol. 35A: Word Biblical
Commentary : Luke 1:1-9:20. Word Biblical Commentary (Page 67). Dallas: Word, Incorporated).
The Old Testament tells us that one item was placed inside the Ark while in the Sinai Wilderness as a witness to the
people of Israel. God had given Moses the Ten Commandments written on stone with his own finger. God told Moses to
place the tablets inside the Ark (Deut 10:3-5) so that they would always be at the heart of their worship.
Hebrews 9:4 tells us that two additional things were placed in the Ark: . . . the Ark of the covenant covered on all sides
with gold, in which was a golden jar holding the manna, and Aarons rod which budded, and the tables of the covenant. 9
Each of the three items had profound significance and were always to be with the people in the very presence of God in
the Ark.
In my DVD Mary, the Mother of God, here is how I describe the three items placed in the Ark of the Old Covenant:
But theres even more. Inside the Ark is the law of God inscribed on stone, and in the Book of Hebrews we
read theres also an urn of manna from the wilderness and the rod of Aaron, which budded. What an amazing
parallel!
Here we have the law of God inscribed on stone, but in the womb of Mary we have the word of God in flesh, a
person.
Here we have the urn of manna, which was the manna come down from heaven that if we ate of it we would
still die, but in Marys womb is the Bread of Life come down from heaven, that if we eat of it we will never die.
And here we have the rod of Aaron, which is the proof of the true priesthood, but in Marys womb, Mary, this
Ark of the Covenant, is the true priest. What an amazing parallel between these two.
St. Gregory the Wonder Worker in the third century tells us that Mary is truly an Ark gold within and gold
without, and she has received in her womb all the treasures of the sanctuary. A beautiful image...and its not the
last time well see Mary as the Ark -- just wait and see!
Mary as the Ark Revealed by the Items inside the Ark
Inside Ark of the Old Covenant
Again, this cannot be a coincidence, especially if we put it together with the overshadowing and the visit to
Elizabeths house. Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant. But there is even more.
The Temple and Ark now in Heaven
The book of Revelation was pretty much rejected by the early Christians. Many did not believe it belonged in the Bible.
It was not really accepted universally until the end of the 4 th century so it was never much studied or discussed until later
centuries. But after it was finally declared as part of the canon by the bishops of the Catholic Church, Christians realized
there was more revelation in the Bible about Mary as the Ark.
In the Old Testament we are told early on that the only thing inside the Ark was the word of God inscribed on tablets of stone (Deut 10:35; 1 Ki 8:9-11). Placed near the Ark was the rod of Aaron that budded (Num 17:10-11) and the golden urn containing manna from the
wilderness (Ex 16:33). However, the book of Hebrews informs us that all three items were inside the Ark (Heb 9:4). There may have been
a later tradition or practice of keeping all three in the Ark which would correspond to the words of Hebrews 9:4.
The Apostle John was exiled to the Island of Patmos. Janet and I went there a couple of times to study the background to
this book of the Bible. In Revelation 11:19 John says something that would have shocked any 1 st century Jew. The Ark
of the Old Covenant had been lost for centuries no one had seen it for about 600 years.
But in Revelation 11:19 John makes a surprise announcement: And the temple of God which is in heaven was opened;
and the Ark of His covenant appeared in His temple. . . .
At this point chapter 11 ends and chapter 12 begins, but the Bible was not written with chapter and verse divisions; they
were added in the twelfth century. When John penned these words, there was no division between chapters 11 and 12. 10
So, immediately in the context of saying he saw the Ark of the Covenant in heaven, what is the next thing John says?
A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown
of twelve stars; and she was with child . . . (Rev 12:1-2a). Who was the woman? Mary, the Ark of the Covenant was
revealed by God and John saw it in heaven. She was seen bearing the child who would rule the world with a rod of iron
(Rev 12:5). Mary was seen as the Ark and as a queen.
But does this passage really refer to Mary? Some say the woman represents Israel or the Church, and certainly she does.
Johns use of rich symbolism is well known, but it is obvious from the Bible itself that the woman is Mary. The Bible
begins with a real man (Adam), a real woman (Eve) and a real serpent (the devil) and it also ends with a real man
(Jesus, the Last Adam, 1 Cor 15:45), a real woman (Mary the New Eve 11, Rev 11:1912:2) and a real serpent (the devil
of old).12 All this was foretold in Genesis 3:15.
Later in the same chapter it says that the devil went out to persecute the womans other offspring Christians which
certainly seems to indicate Mary is somehow the mother of the Church (Rev 12:17).
So, here again we see very good scriptural evidence of Mary being revealed by God in Scripture as the Ark of the New
Covenant. Even if someone disagrees with Catholic teaching, they cannot argue that there is good and reasonable
scriptural foundations for this teaching. And it is a teaching that has been taught by Christians from ancient times. 13
What Did the Early Christians Teach about Mary and the Ark?
Here are a few representative quotations some written well before the New Testament books were finally collected
into the final New Testament canon.
Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296 373) was the main defender of the deity of Christ against the 2 nd century heretics. He
wrote: O noble Virgin, truly you are greater than any other greatness. For who is your equal in greatness, O dwelling
place of God the Word? To whom among all creatures shall I compare you, O Virgin? You are greater than them all O
(Ark of the) Covenant, clothed with purity instead of gold! You are the Ark in which is found the golden vessel
containing the true manna, that is, the flesh in which Divinity resides. Homily of the Papyrus of Turin.
10
The different divisions of the material within the NT books are not ancient. The chapter divisions are usually attributed to Cardinal
Hugo de San Caro, who in A.D. 1248 used them in preparing a Bible index, but he may have borrowed them from the earlier [Catholic]
archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen Langton. The modern verses derive from Robert Estienne (Stephanus), who, according to his son
Henry, made the divisions while on a journey on horseback from Paris to Lyons. They were first published in Stephanus Greek Testament
of 1551 and first appeared in an English translation of the NT in William Whittinghams version of 1557. The first complete Bible in
English with our verses was the Geneva Bible of 1560 (Achtemeier, Harpers Bible Dictionary, 699).
11
Mary as the New Eve is another fascinating adventure through the Old and New Testaments.
12
John Henry Cardinal Newman comments: What I would maintain is this, that the Holy Apostle would not have spoken of the Church
under this particular image, unless there had existed a blessed Virgin Mary, who was exalted on high and the object of veneration to all the
faithful. No one doubts that the man-child spoken of is an allusion to our Lord; why then is not the Woman an allusion to his mother?
13
Often there are theologians and preachers who, following in the footsteps of the holy Fathers, have been rather free in their use of
events and expressions taken from Sacred Scripture to explain their belief in the Assumption. Thus, to mention only a few of the texts
rather frequently cited in this fashion, some have employed the words of the psalmist: "Arise, O Lord, into your resting place: you and the
ark, which you have sanctified"; and have looked upon the Ark of the Covenant, built of incorruptible wood and placed in the Lord's
temple, as a type of the most pure body of the Virgin Mary, preserved and exempt from all the corruption of the tomb and raised up to
such glory in heaven (Pope Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus, November 1, 1950).
Gregory the Wonderworker (c. 213 c. 270) an early Christian teacher wrote: Let us chant the melody which has been
taught us by the inspired harp of David, and say, Arise, O Lord, into Thy rest; Thou, and the Ark of Thy sanctuary. For
the holy Virgin is in truth an Ark, wrought with gold both within and without, that has received the whole treasury of the
sanctuary.14
The Catechism of the Catholic Church echoes the words from the earliest centuries, Mary, in whom the Lord himself
has just made his dwelling, is the daughter of Zion in person, the Ark of the covenant, the place where the glory of the
Lord dwells. She is the dwelling of God . . . with men. (CCC 2676).
There are many quotations I could provide because it was widely taught, but I have only added a few to keep it from
being too long. The early Christians taught the same thing that the Catholic Church teaches today about Mary, especially
about her being the Ark of the New Covenant. For a comprehensive collection of patristic quotations, click here
http://www.catholic-convert.com/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/Documents/MaryArkPatristics.doc.
Conclusion
So, that about does it! Thanks for asking me to explain Mary and the Ark of the New Covenant. I hope you enjoy
reading it as much as I enjoyed writing it. Janet says Hi!
Addendum 1: Objections
1. Jesus is the new Ark of the Covenant (Romans 3:25), not Mary.
That passage states that Jesus is a propitiatory sacrifice, not the Propitiatory itself (the cover of the Ark, also
called the mercy seat). Though some early Christians speculated that the old Ark could be a type of Christ, the
Bible does not state that Jesus is the Ark of the New Covenant. Nor does it deny that Mary is the New Ark; in
fact it strongly insinuates that she is.
The Ark was a created thing, a mere vessel which carried the presence of God. Jesus is not just a vessel carrying
Gods presence, He is God Incarnate. Theres a big difference! Mary, on the other hand, is a mere creature, a
living vessel who carried the presence of God. She is to the New Covenant what the Ark was to the Old
Covenant. Though the Bible never portrays Jesus as the New Ark, we saw above that II Samuel 6:2-11 clearly
parallels the Visitation thus indicating that Mary is the New Ark.
2. John 1:14 says the word became flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory. In the Greek the word
dwelt is skeinoo from the Hebrew word shekinah which was the word for God residing in the
Tabernacle. Jesus clothed himself in human flesh (Phil 2:5-8) the Ark was His body as it had carried the
creator of the universe. It was not Mary who was the Ark, but Jesus Christs body that was the Tabernacle.
Again, this passage does not state that Jesus is the Ark of the New Covenant. We have seen above that Mary is
compared to the Ark twice in St. Lukes Gospel.
3. The Ark was made of acacia wood and gold; the wood signified Jesus humanity and the gold His Deity.
Why should part of the Ark symbolize Deity when it bore the Deity Himself? It seems repetitious and
unnecessary. The gold may just as well symbolize royalty, since Mary is the queen mother, or purity as
mentioned by Gregory the wonderworker or perhaps grace, with which Mary is filled.
4. The contents of the Ark prove that it is a type of Christ, since they are all types of the Messiah.
The tablets containing the Ten Commandments, the Manna and Aarons budded staff all do signify Christ, Who
is the living Word of God, the Bread of Life and the High Priest. But the Ark is the vessel meant to hold these
things, even as Mary is the Vessel who bore Jesus. Many have seen the Ark as a type of Christ too, and that is
also legitimate, however, there is more evidence to see Mary as the Ark and the two do not negate each other.
14
Roberts, A., Donaldson, J., & Coxe, A. C. (1997). The Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI : Translations of the writings of the Fathers down to
A.D. 325. Fathers of the Third Century: Gregory Thaumaturgus, Dionysius The Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius and Minor Writers,
Methodius, Arnobius. Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems.
Each can be used as various metaphors, just as the temple can be seen as both the body of Christ, the Church,
and the believer.
5. But the Jews worshiped the Ark; and were not supposed to worship Mary.
The Jews were not supposed to worship the Ark, only the Shekinah Glory enthroned upon it. If any Jews did
worship the box itself (which is doubtful) then they were committing idolatry, as would anyone who worships
Mary, the New Ark. Worship is reserved for the Trinity alone.
6. If Mary were the New Ark of the Covenant, then all the things which happened to the old Ark would have to
have happened to her. So Mary would have to have been stolen by pagans and gone into exile as the Ark did (I
Samuel 4:11).
This argument only backfires on the user, since most Protestants believe the Ark to be a type of Christ, but He
wasnt kidnapped by pagans and carried off to a foreign land either! A New Testament character need not
experience everything which his or her Old Testament type did: King David was a type of Christ, but Jesus
never committed adultery as David did; the prophet Jonah was a type of Christ, but Jesus never disobeyed God,
etc.. Thus Mary also did not have to experience everything which happened to the Ark of the Old Covenant.
The above Objections were taken from a website for which I want to give full credit though I edited it a bit. I
do not know the authors name, but the website address is
http://members.tripod.com/~maryimmaculate/marian2.html).
Addendum 2: Mary the Ark of the Covenant, by my friend Patrick Madrid.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1991/9112fea1.asp