Calalas vs. Court of Appeals, 332 SCRA 356, May 31, 2000
Calalas vs. Court of Appeals, 332 SCRA 356, May 31, 2000
and
SECOND DIVISION.
357
357
_______________
358
358
359
359
MENDOZA, J.:
SO ORDERED.
360
360
_______________
361
_______________
361
363
362
362
363
364
364
Juan F. Nakpil & Sons v. Court of Appeals, 144 SCRA 596 (1986);
365
365
_______________
Fores v. Miranda, 105 Phil. 236 (1959); Mercado v. Lira, 3 SCRA 124
Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. v. Esguerra, 117 SCRA 741 (1982);
366
(1989).
366
Sabena Belgian World Airlines v. Court of Appeals, 171 SCRA 620 (1989);
(1961).
_______________
Those are her physical pains and moral sufferings, the inevitable
bedfellows of the injuries that she suffered. Under Article 2219 of
the Civil Code, she is entitled to recover moral damages in the
sum of P50,000.00, which is fair, just and reasonable.
o0o