Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Divorce Attorney Maria Schopp Letter & Forged Order: San Francisco Superior Court Judge Patrick J. Mahoney - Illegal Child Custody Order - San Francisco Superior Court Presiding Judge John K. Stewart - Court Executive Officer T. Michael Yuen - The Law Office of Maria Schopp, San Francisco
Divorce Attorney Maria Schopp Letter & Forged Order: San Francisco Superior Court Judge Patrick J. Mahoney - Illegal Child Custody Order - San Francisco Superior Court Presiding Judge John K. Stewart - Court Executive Officer T. Michael Yuen - The Law Office of Maria Schopp, San Francisco
MARlA SCHOPP
SAN FRANCISCO. CA
J\tlorney ar Law
94 lo2.
Mediator
T
F
February
415 861.1019
415.863.8596
26, 2010
I hereby transmit
copy of my proposed
from today's
hearing on the limited issue of the Respondent having no further visitation with the
parties' minor child.
(415) 861-1019.
Sincerely,
Maria Schopp
lb/MES
cc:
A. Cunningham
M. Wang
CJBNS.ORG
1528
Fl-340
RNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY(Name an<
s)
MARIA SCHOPP
THE
212745
LAW OFFICE
OF
SCHOPP
MARIA
818
SAN
415-861-1019
FAXNO.(opional) 415-863
8596
MARY W ANG
_--1
- - R-I O_ R_ C-:O _ U_ _:._
,E
_O_ _ _ _ _ __ O _ _ l _ _ _C_O _-UNT_Y _O_F_S_ A_RA_N__ CI_
N F S_ C_0 _ _
R T F C A L l F R N A,
TELEPHONE NO..
TTORNEYFOR(Name)
srnEET ADDREss
McALL ISTER
(SAME)
4O O
MAILING ADDRESS;
STREET
CA
!//D
F I L
County Uptrlor Court
.
'
Fnmc/1100
94102
BRANCH NAME;
>ETITIONERIPLAINTIFF:
WANG
MARY
>PONDENT/DEFENDANT:ARCHIBALD
CUNN INGHAM
OTHER:
FINDINGS AND ORDER
m(date):02/25/10
at(time):
IZl
Petitioner/plaintiff present
XI Respondent/defendant present
:::J Other present
FD I
9 : 00 a.m.
iyJudge(name):Patrick Mahoney.
:J
CASE NUMBER;
A FTER HEARING
D
D
06/03/09
inDept.: 405
Room:405
Attomey present(name):
Maria Schopp
Attorney present(name) :
by (name)
:Archibald Cunningham
Not applicable
Child
IX)
Not applicable
FL-343
Not applicable
Property orders:
Not applicable
Other order s:
D As attached
Not applicable
As attached on form
03- 7 5 3 7 7 0
Temporary Judge
ie:
proved
forthwith
other (specify):
;;k,/-,
as
/,
_.{Lfp
PATRICK J. MAHO F .'1
rnAdaptedtorMandatO<)'Use
1dicial Councit of California
L-340
[Rev. July 1.
200
3]
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF
rrlTilfnRM
(Z)
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
I
F NDINGS AND ORDER A FTER HEARING
(Family Law-Custody an d Support-Uniform Parentage)
WANG
1530
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: Wang'
ry
5 NUMBER
RESPONOENT/OEFENDANT:Cunningharn,
Archibald
(specify
FL-341
733770
number(specify):
relating to the parties in this case are in effect
court):
under Penal Code section 136.2, are current, and have priority of enforcement.
petitioner
respondent
other
(specify) :
will have supervised visitation with the minor children according to the schedule
a.
b.
c.
petitioner
other (specify):
respondent
petitioner
0
D other (specify) :
respondent
e.
f.
g.
D Other
d.
devices.
During the exchanges, the parent driving the children will wait in the car and the other parent will wait in his or
her home while the children go between the car and the home.
(specify) :
petitioner
respondent
0 other (name) :
must have written permission from the other parent or a court order to take the children out of
a.
the state of California.
b.
c.
D
CJ
0
::J
Child abduction prevention. There is a risk that one of the'parents will take the children out of California without the other
::J
Holiday schedule. The children wiil spend holiday time as listed in the attached
::J
CJ
other
(specify):
Additional custody provisions. The parents will follow the additional custody provisions listed in the attached
0 other (specify):.
:J Joint legal custody. The parents will share joint legal custody as listed in the attached
:zl
other (specify):
Other (specify) ;
Respondent's
statements
ma de
in open
court
in the
further
May
8,
2008,
follow
Judge
effective February
26, 2010.
Jurisdiction. This court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and
Enforcement Act (part 3 of the California Family Code, commencing with section 3400).
Notice and opportunity to be heard. The responding party was given notice and an opportunity to be heard, as provided by the
other (specify):
Penalties for violating this order. If you violate this order, you may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, or both.
rtoR14s;;
Ct-flQCUSl'DD
Page 2 of2
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
FL-341
ry
Wan g,
c NUMBER:
753770
1529
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION ORDER ATIACHMENT
IX)
Other (specify) :
TO
Judgment
Child's name
Legal custody to
Physical custody to
Jel
05/31/00
Cunningham
C.
Mary Wang
Mary Wang
I Visitation
a.
D Reasonable right of visitation to the party without physical custody(not appropriate in cases
involving domestic
violence)
D
D
d.
ID
e.
b.
c.
(1)
date):
location):
will be as follows:
1st
2nd
3rd
D 4th
5th
at
from
(day of week)
at
p.m.
a.m.
p.m.
(time)
(day of week)
a.m.
(time)
to
(a)
petitioner
even
respondent
(b)
(2)
The
from
petitioner
______
The
Weekdays starting
petitioner
at
-----
at
__,o,_
___
a.m.
respondent
p.m.
o p.m.
will have the children with him or her during the period
____
(day of week)
Other
(date) :
a.m.
p.m.
(time)
(day of week)
(4) D
a.m.
(time)
from
to
(time)
______
months.
will have the children with him or her during the period
(day of week)
(3)
odd
(date) :
respondent
(day of week)
to
at
----- D
a.m.
p.m.
(time)
1t0;J0lfifori58
iev.
July 1, 2006]
.c-/
CJBNS.ORG