Debunking Jon Carroll
Debunking Jon Carroll
MSGR
:w
REC'D BY- SB
COPY RECEIVED
JAN 26 2016
Ti ME:
Q~?'
_FILED
_ _ LODGED
__ ENTERED
__ RECEIVED
JAN 27 2016
DJ
. AT SEATTLE
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
B~STERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
DEPUTY
Re; CV16-00046JC
To:
_FILED
_LODGED
_ENTERED
_RECEIVED
AT SEATTLE
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
BY
98101-2904
DJ
JAN 27 2016
00046JC. The heading; for which this case action is styled under has been recorded in the
Federal Clerk's Office as a "Complaint For Declaratory Judgment" by individual Jon C.
Carroll; identifying himself as a legal resident of said county and state in seeking this
Honorable Court's favorable ruling for bringing forth before a jury for determination.
At issue, for the purpose of this official letter is the Plaintiff's access to this court's
jurisdiction, founded on fact based supporting facts and evidences. This official letter in
itself will not represent the validity in total the weighty merits required being brought
forth before this Honorable Court, at some later date realizing the Plaintiff's filing
had been disingenuous-and misleading; on the surface, the court had no reason to know,
could not have known, that the Plaintiff while listing his photojournalism experiences and
accomplishments, giving the appearances of international connections, has obvious
chosen to delete from making known before this Honorable Court that at same time he is
DEPU
actively engaged in his personally self owned-operating publishing blog, located and
licensed in supposedly Henry CoW1ty, Alabama with a Abbeville, Alabama Post Office
Box No.
This personal information never appears anywhere within the content of plaintiff's
complaint before this Honorable Court, whereas, first, raising concems/doubts validity
for this Honorable Court's jurisdiction; secondly, because plaintiff left suspfoiously from
this Alabama area latter 2015 to whereabouts unknown; later was understood headed for
Canada, to supposedly avoid being served legal docwnents that resulted from Civil
actions filed. Standing is qualified as result of plaintiff's decision to deliberately name
within the filing of this civil action author of this letter by name, but far more troubling
the fact that this filing has intentionally Jed this Honorable Court to believe that all within
documents' nanatives~ descriptions, listings, examples, and displays have been lawfully
and legally obtained, which in fact is not correct, and furthennore not true; giving any
average minded person the impression for purposeful deceiving and deceptions of this
Honorable Court. While the author of this letter writes on]y in his sole behalf and his
alone; although via a telephone conversation recently another individua1 listed in this
plaintiff's case filing before this Honorable Court can be identified as one Ms. Jacque
Bargoon, advising of her too having had docwnents removed by p]aintiff; others, this
author having no knowledge of.
As the author of this letter I have only within past few days learned ofthis
plaintiffs filing of this civil action's information from a local, Alabama, source; why,
you may ask is any of his filing a concern of mine? I had never known of, never heard of
the plaintiff before late swnmer 2015; and then only through a friend who had heard
'
about him through his daily/weekly local/area bloggings and thought I may want to call
on him for a meeting to discuss the possibilities of helping me with a book I had written.
He was told over the phone before our fitst one on one meeting that I had been fallen by a
disabling sttoke, and that all my materials for my book had been dropped over time and
that I needed help organizing and editing. He advised me that he was sure that he could
help, and where he couldn't he knew enough people that could. Talking back and forth
over telephone a few times, I was lead to believe I could trust him especially since never
having met him before, and continuously reminding him of m y having had a stroke and
confined to home, and my wife's worry for my continued involvements. From those first
few telephone conversations laid ground work for first afternoon meeting at my residence.
This ftrst meeting, with a friend who he had brought with him, we talked on my front
porch for about 45 minutes, give or take. Originally wanting to audio and video me, I told
the plaintiff from the start that making of any audio or video was not going to be allowed
or authorized. Plus to reinsure my position because ofmy stroke, health problems with
short~term memory lost at 72 years old, hard of hearing, that he was not authorized to
audio Ol' video; anything done without my expressed and written in advance authority
given him would be a violation of my trust, to which in every visit, then, and theteafter he
agreed to honol' to the fullest; I believe all total visits to my residence there were four.
His actions at. subsequently resulting from plaintiff having been at my residence
late swnmer 2015 is now the bedrock qualifying sound statements evidences addressed
within this official lettel'. First and foremost I write not for me first as an individual, but
to the greater contrary; the protection of other's. friends or not of mine. rights to lesal and
lawful opportunities to benefit from my years of efforts to make their stories known since
before 2002, and not to be profited off of after their having suffered, endured years of
tragedies, and traumatizing emotional depressions resulting from their families suffering
from murders, beatings, imprisonments, and the list goes on.
But, the anchor of al] the accumulations of years of infonnation, interviews.
evidences gathered by not onJy myself, but my friend and attorney the Late and
Honorable Brian W. Dowling beginning Swnmer, June 1997, paralleling FBI tri-states
gambling raids; eventually involving both ofus in litigations tied to illegal drugs,
65 holll'S after having ordered the issuance for me of 30 subpoenas that would have a
direct bearing on the exposing continued cover up involving Mr. Dowlings murder too.
Within same month I had my stroke August 2002.
The litigation between the plaintiff and defendants are for their resolving and not of
this author's concern; but it is of most panunount and urgent that this Honorable Court
does move forthwith denying plaintiff, for now and evermore any/all his
agents/associates/partners present or future use in the narrative, audio, or video
communications' forms any referred to, described, listed, or displayed examples obtained
from the residence, for any plaintiff's purpose[s], of this official letter's author.
While true, and I realize, this letter may not be the proper legal document vehicle
for any individual to become a party to this civil case action, it is the well planned
intention of same to participate as "a friend of the court" via Americus curiae in an effort
contributing to the protecting of this Court's Honor, Esteem, Integrity, and Public Trust;
defined within the U.S. Code Title 18, of Part I, of Chapter 101, for Section 2071:
"CONCEALMENT, Removal, Mutilation generally", ref 62 Stat. 795 June 25111 1948
2071 (a); Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates,
or destroys, or attempts to do so, or with intent to do so ......... filed with any clerk andlot
officer of court of the United States ........"
Therefore qualifying, in fact the compelling of both the Seattle's 9111 U.S. Circuit's
U.S. Attorney's Office and Federal Bureau oflnvestigationjurisdictlons to intervene into
plaintiffs motivation for singling out this particular court, in lieu of court within
plaintiff's longtime established residence jurisdiction; and too, plaintiff's continuous day
to day operations of business commonly known to public as "The Henry County
Reporter", the U.S. 11 Ill Circuit Atlanta, Georgia; via U.S. District Cgurt for the Middle
District of Alabama loeated in Mont_gomer_y. Alabama only less than l 00 miles away
from identified and/or implied named sources referred to in plaintiff's filing.
The plaintiff has sought out the U.S. Court located the greatest distance from
making convenient and accessible the very parties plaintiff so freely names and from
whom claimed any and all infonnation and document copies provided plaintiff for
publishing his articles were so readily. freely, and never without restriction provided him
thus allowing plaintiff to have appeared before this Honorable Court without haYing ever
known of accwnulations of misrepresentations brought before thi:, Honorable Court via
this plaintiff's civil action's filing, and the W1derlying ulterior motives believed for
--------------------
------
having done so regarding those others also, liken to same as author of this official letter.
In conclusion, the plaintiff not only makes known to this Honorable Court his
established residence, furthermore his continuing day to day ongoing blogging business;
but fails to make known to this Honorable Court that during plaintiff's second visit to
author of this official letter's residence that plaintiff did in fact, without this author's first
knowledge of, advance approval of, or even in the aftermath a subsequent awareness of
plaintiff having made secretly a clandestine video photo of author's person at his
residence. This author only learning of how been secretly violated of his trust placed in
plaintiff via neighbors co-workers seeing photo of author of internet and telling family
members. Plaintiff when confronted, agreeing to stop, not to blog audio/video of this
author, his private properties ever again wou1d soon be found out to be again
untrustworthy. While all during these same times this plaintiff was continuously seeking
from, to get any and all physical properties he could access. But after first incident with
photo, having been the third meeting, by the forth was obvious to plaintiff that no longer
cou1d be anticipated any further opportunities gain access to file copies for audio/video.
The last communication that this author had from plaintiff after refusing to discuss, to
agree to give RT an interview, after learning RT was "Russia Today"; and refusing to
again and again provide further documents, sent message~ MCome back down
(supposedly from Canada) there and beat his elderly ass." Please, assist in forwarding
copies to clerk's office and bW"Cau's office since they are without fax. Thanking you in
In the United States District Court, for the U.S. 9' Circuit, Western District of
Washington at Seattle
}
}
}
Vs.
John White
Carlton ..Bubba" Ott
Mike Magiino
Andy Hughes
Tony Spivey
Eddie Henderson
Rex Tipton
Keith Cauthen
Steve Parrish, Defendants
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
INTRODUCTION
COMES now the petitioner by and through self representation before this
Honorable Court, not in seeking material and/or monetary damages via this court's
findings; but whose one and only purpose is not self centered and/or driven, but rather to
the contrary as previous years history will support; privately and publicly for those,
friends of mine, or either those having never been known to me before; for reasons, the
advocating of their equal rights, protections, and due processes, originally beaiMing
1997. By 1999 having joined small local activist group, C.L.A.R.A. [Citizens for Legal
Accountability and Refol'lll in Alabama], who likewise had same concerns as petitioner,
becoming even more engaged within an even smaller core of group which included about
10/12 individuals: A retired school teacher, a medical doctor, two attorneys, paralegal,
two small businessmen, a farmer, a retired serviceman, a county secretary, a college
student, and a waitress.
THE petitioner now moves this Honorable Court to deny any/all request for this
court's ruling in part or whole involving this plaintifrs Complaint for Declaratory
Judgment. Petitioner1s merits in these matters before this court are sound and qualified.
Namely, plaintiff does not list in his complaint that he is owner-operator of his business
"The Henry County Report'\ also affixed atop of posted articles plaintiff's personal photo,
located in Abbeville, Alabama with a post office box address. Plaintiff has come before
this court in such a disingenuous narrative presentation, now has caused or caused to be
caused of this Honorable Court to be under duty and obligation to demand of plaintiff to
be forthcoming with all, total, and complete facts, and truths plaintiff references to as
either indirectly or directly applies to this petitioner during few weeks latter 2015, which
at no time was told verbally, or given in writing to post anything plaintiff had access to
under petitioner's true beliefs and understandings were for the purposes in aiding in
organizing and book editing of past years experiences, before having been faUen by
disabling stroke and left handicapped, restricted to residence. The petitioner knows that
plaintiff has without authority or authorization made, taken, and/or removed physical
items and/or audio/videos made in secret without petitioner's knowledge at time. These
matters before this Honorable Court are more far reaching, and shouJd strive to avoid
being made "a fool''. The plaintiff has sought personal exposures, and now thru this filing
plans for pursuing personal material and monetary gains on the backs of others, without
their knowledge hideous pains. Claiming before multiple natiooal media sources that
plaintiff had hundreds of documents commands of this court to challenge plaintiff as to
validity and factuality of said statement[s] by publicly presenting before this Honorable
Court, and from whom, individually named persons, did plaintiff acquire and how so
much of others personal affaits.
The plaintiff dishonors those he so causally refers to, namely my
friend and.former third shift fellow police office, assassinated Dothan Police Narcotics
Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson, my longtime friend and attorney the late and
Hawlett, friend of Ms. JB. Beasley, both found murdered execution style Ozark,
Alabama, Ms. Tracie Howlett having been the first born, daughter, of my police academy
roommate Dothan Police Patrol Corporal Robert Hawlett, found suspiciously drown and,
but not limited to, the late and Honorable Jennifer Atwell, found suspiciously dead in less
than seventy-two hours after having ordered the issuance of thirty subpoenas tied to the
suspicious "hit and rim" homi(;ide ofattorney Brian Dowling and/or shptgun
assaJ.Yl>tarion
R .
zcer ober/ Jack.son. ttr oL-- .:~.,_
'
,. '-
I"Ct:effeCI.
documentary involving those unknown to him, until coming to petitioner's residence, the
petitioner moves the Honorable Court to order plaintiff to return to his home city/county
of licensed business and do so ethically and honorably. This petition,t h!! no vested
interest i!l the participation or ougome in this case action's decision between
plaintiff and/or defendants, for whatever their litigations; it. is each of theirs, the law
information/events otherwise will never be made known of before this court involving the
above styled recorded case number #CVJ6-00046JC.
"Puckett vs. Cox: [1972] 456f.2d 233; It was held that a prose complaint requires a
less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer, per Ju.srice Black in Conley vs.
Gibson."
WHEREBY> comes now the petitioner, Wykle D. Williams, Jr., at age of seventytwo years,
representation, prose, and with utmost respect beseech ofthis Honorable Court to move
his person to achieve plaintiff's own self serving personal material and monetary gains as
a dil'ect and specific result thereof having aequired from petitioner petitioner's personally
owned/stored documents/papers/photos/materials/etc.
"JENKINS vs. McKEffHEN: [1959) 395 U.S. 411, 421: Prose pleadings are to be
considered without regard to technically, pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to
same high standards ofperfection as lawyers.
STANDING: Petitioner's standing in these matters before the court are qualified
and sound. Petitioner's issues before this court do not totally rest with either the plaintiff
or defendants, for their litigations are for their own settling. Petitioner's on the contrary is
different because of plaintiff's narrative[s] and references made directly and specifically
involving petitioner which on the legal merits have not beeri presented before this court in
a manner consistent with honor, integrity, ethics, and compassion when using for
journalism props others trust. This honorable COW't is duty bound, has an obHgation to
shotgw:i assassination of police officer Robert Jackson, or any others whose names/info
plaintiff did acquire unknowingly from petitioner. Over this short period of time 2015
plaintiff did knowingly and personally engage in multiple violations welJ defined within
the State of Alabama Criminal Codes 13A- sections, namely "Larceny", [larceny after
three times being denied access to his equal rights filing either and/or city/federal
incident/offense reports. Letter dated June 1999, petitioner to AUSA Holmes before
October l 999 gambling trillls, still continuing to seek justice for son, to this date, denied!
Likewise information and evidences provided too via attorney Brian Dowling until his
murder April 13 1". 2000. Petitioner moves this Honorable Court, guided by its conscious
of the law, not to fail those seen as weak, of easy prey. and who cannot speak aloud for
themselves any longer, being made mockeries of by same who claim powers and
authorities promoting justice for all.
WHETHER in part/whole; no one item or more than one item[s) at anytime was
ever released to plaintiff in any fonns/styles for plaintiff's journalism operational care,
custody, or controls, or any other authorities to function in any official capacity; plaintiff
was told time and time again and again he was not given pennission, never authoriud to
make audio or video of petitioner's person; yet in direct violation ofpedtioner's trust,
plaintiff did in fact brazenly violate secretly petitioner's trUst and confidence by posting
on his blog pages and photos believed by petitioner to have been secretly videoed; and
furthermore plaintiff was without exception, resetVation told, more than one time that he
was not authorized, whether in audio/video tape fonns never to act in secrecy involving
petitioner/personal properties. Petitioner moves this court to order involving plaintiff lhe
public enforcing ofFederal Rules o_fCivil Procedures, Rule #37, "Failure to Make
Disclosure.s. or to Cooptr(Jte in Discovery Sanctions''.
WHILE at all times during plaintiff's movements did cause petitioner to become
trusting and taking plaintiff into petitioner's confidence. Plaintiff after having already
established origjnaJ contact with petitioner somewhere arowid about summer 2015 was
by that time fully aware in detail about petitioner's having endured a disabling stroke,
acrually even prior to plaintiff's/petitioner's first meeting, which had been established for
one primary and particular purpose; for their discussion regarding plaintiff's assistance in
helping obtain someone traveling out-of-state with journalism editing backgrowid
qualifications, from Australia for petitioner to help edit past twelve years of his attempts
to write a book, only to be denied due being handicapped and complicated because of
series docwnentary about isolated incidents/events petitioner having had for decades,
recent yea.rs, a close/vested interest in; specifically the assassination of friend and fellow
law enforcement Dothan police officer Robert Jackson; none of which plaintiff had ever
been cognizant of previously) nor could have ever been undennines plaintiff's narrative
in filing, Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Federal Rules ofCivil Procedures, Rule#
26, "A duty to disclose general provisions, government discovery"; when involving any
and all words, verbiages, punctuations, grammars, descriptions, mentioning, addressing,
referencing, and/or in any other styles or fashions not herein spelled out tied directly to,
and/or indirectly to the name of the deceased State of Alabama [black) Law Enforcement
Dothan Police Narcotics Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson; or his widow BiJlie Jackson,
or son Robert Jackson, Jr., or daughter Yolanda Jackson; or in fact any other individual
who by name was MOngfully ~uired by plaintiff unauthorized by petitioner. Likewise
as equally applicable any and all types, styles, and forms of petitioner's persona) physical
properties; but not to be overshadowed, occurring at any and all times, providing
originals of existing audio/video tapes made of petitioner with accompanying audio/video
worst in violation of trust, rising to levc:l of theft. otherwise some of what plaintiff has
posted could not have otherwise come into his possession.
WHEREFORE. Petitioner respectfully request that this Honorable Court moves
forthwith in the issuing of an injunction for purpose of ordering plaintiff to make mute
either in audio and/or video forms, or via written narratives of same items; likewise that
this Honorable Court compel plaintiff to move without delay in presenting before this
court absolutely all documents, most specifically theil' origins, their owners, specific
these issues; same as, and/or similar in nature as read within the content ofplaintifrs
complaint; known examples, #16, #31, #76 [Q,U,R] E,G,H,M,J,L, AND #77 M,R; and all
other styles, follllS, examples regardless their being in audio, video, photo, or
written/typed evidences.
CONCLUSION
PETITIONER seeks not to intervene/interfere in any present or future planning by
plaintiff to continue and further expand his profession, photojournalism, to each his own;
just don't take advantage of those seen weak and vulnerable by gaining their trust; getting
access to private properties; when found out them being threaten, also having encouraged
them to give personal television interviews on TV station without ever telling them that
the 1elevision station RT is actually Russia Today after having many times given false
hopes of government interventions via formal investigations initiated by U.S. Attorney's
Office, Alabama Atrorney General's Office, Special Prosecutor, Matt Hart, CNN just
- - - - - - -------.......
E, and F; [2) Deprive. Items A, B, D, and E; [06] Obtains. Items A and B; [07] Obtains
or Exerts Control, or Obtains or Exerts Unauthorized Control; [ I OJ Property. Tangible or
Intangible, the Location[s] Which can be Changed~ [12) Stolen. Obtained by Theft; [13]
Threat. Items A. F, and G; [14] Value. {Petitioner's Personal Book's} Market Value.
targeted for three criminal violations in Dothan. Alabama, since latest 1996 just before
January 1997 FBI/city police surprise multi-states gambling raids never, not once has my
son been able to file an official criminal incident/offense report to generate an FBI/CID
official investigation after him having been a premeditated target for Criminal
Impersonation, Alabama Title Code I JA-9-18, subsequently beaten unmercifully;
Assault and Battery, Alabama Title Code l JA-06-22, having his front teeth knocked out
and facial bone fractures, eye socket floor fractures damages, blurring visions. acute
lacerations, severe contusions, and significant abrasions; and before the gambling trial
due on October 1999 federal docket in Montgomery, Alabama my son was approached
by two bookies charged in the gambling cases and offered a $5,000.00 bribe, Influencing
a Witness, Alabama Title Code l3A-10124, to influence his testimony; their beliefs him
having been a victim tied to their illegal gambling operations could be called as a
government witness especially since him being CriminalJy Impersonated at their main
facility wa.s apparent, although cases Assistant U.S. Prosecuting Attorney, Ms. Ashton
Holmes refused him as witness; bookies telling him tell me stop writing complaint to city,
that it's making people upset. Strange, nobody ever been upset him being beaten; even hi
miles away from residence to do Hve interview, then was CBS, then was Senate Judiciary
Committee Chainnan, also representatives from the Hilliary Clinton Presidential
Campaign having an interest getting involved bringing national exposures, none of whom
ever materialized, just not the right way to treat people.
fully,
~,<l)~~
/
36301
[334] 793-7525
January 20th, 2016
-~---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --"
remarl<.s to those back in Alabama location that out there in that [Seattle] jurisdiction he
could find "a Jewish judge'\ obviously going to the heart of judicial shopping Wl.der false
pretenses.
Yes, judicial protocol is of a necessity and required, but matters gravitating as these
'I-A.I,.,,
UJ
1,/Ci
citizen's attempts "to do the right thing" to prevail in the best interest of the court, of
justice.
As of no later than this same date I have been notified of another bloggma posted
by this plaintiff, Mr. Jon C. Carron, which is specifically in direct violated, breach of
trust, revealing from his secretly video copying a private letter, unknown to this petitioner
during one of visits to petitioner's residence. !his particular blgggigg example, a !)'ped
letter to S/A Senior Supervising Apnt In Charge with name and address. but worst
talking with tbl$ plaintiff. Mr. Jon c. Carroll. be bad been told of those whose
identities that would never be topics of discussions, for their own priyatjes and
safeties. yet this plaintiff knowing this did ewegiously wjth wantonness' negli~e
make public a petitioner's personal and private letter to a federal authority regarding
matter of public interest. This plaintiff during these visits operated under the guise while
pretending to take pen and/or pencil written notes for organizational reference purposes
while in assisting of this petitioner's book s pages for editing, being required of due
petitioner fallen by disabling stroke and unknown numbers of chapters in disarray, he
seized on opportunity when once realized of their inflaming opportunities, immediately
their sum totals for marketable values; has brought this petitioner's efforts now before
this court.
The official, and too private, documents at issue before this court, and as well as in
the public domain are factual and authentic; in part, of the whole official internal
investigation which was never obtained from this petitioner. Probably never known of
before this letter to you, yolll' office, this letter's date January 26111, 2016 with exception
of the known original I/A report ..ordered bwied" by Police Chief John C. White; there
has never been known of before the very first clandestine secretly made copy of this I/A
report, which took place during latter winter months into the year 2000. An attorney,
respe<:ted by their peers and having qualified access to officel'Sffacilities was voluntarily
provided documents' copies involving multitudinous incidents; which were immediately
hand delivered unto another attorney having equal interest. himself a member of small
Anyone claiming to have such a vested interest in ''The Due Process Clause" has to
look no further than taking the time to review public records applying to the State of
Alabama's Comptroller Office assigned for designated :records keeping and
reunbursements of fees and expenses for court appointed attorneys [indigent[s] vs. same
attorneys representations and fees and costs for same or similar docketed type cases;
therein nwnbe.-s speaks well for themselves. Washington vs. Glucksberg: 117 S. Ct.
(197) "The due process clause guarantees more than fair process; the "Liberty" it
protects includes more than an absence of physical restraints. The due process clause
protects individual "Liberty" against certain government actions regardless of procedures
used to implement them." Cutting W1bridled brazen plea deals by court appointed
attorneys for convenience of all other parties; rather than sole purpose of court, the
intended justice for defendant must surely rise to and above understood levels best
described within the Black's Law Book definition: "dump-truck lawyers". Rights to
Courts-Access: "Intentional obstruction ofan inmates' access lo the courts is precisely
1he sort ofoppression the JI" Amendment and section 1983 are intended to remedy. ~
right of access to the courts is substantive rather than procedural." Morello vs. J1mes:
810 F .2d 344 [U.S. 2d Circuit! 1987). Furthennore in support of aforementioned: ~The
Right of access to the courts is one of the priyiJe~s and immunities under Article IV. an
aspect of the Fitst Amendment, and fo1.U1ded on the Due Process Clause-" Smith vs.
Mosccber; 899 li' 2.d 940 (U.S. tolh Circuit) 1990]
,..._,
Jalj ,,, i"t1't
LL
------~-----
----------
Nobody. wi..11
e.veit.
1tai.A
11144.
Oil
~ati.on.4?
4uo-con4.ci.ou4
ton?
i.n. deep
Jr.i.4
01t wa.4. lr.e. ma1be. tlr.i.n.kln9- abo.ut hi.4 111i.fe.1 hl4 4.0n.
& dau1Ate.~
kn.0111ln1 W44 cu4toma1tv tlr.e.y.'1te. 1te.a.dv- foll be.J; tltou1A AOt a.4.Le.e.p
ln
Ai.4 1te.a1t
Had
Ae
pa44ed
a pa11.ked vehlcle afte1t tu/lni.n1 off Rock~ b~cin.clr. ~oad onto Youn1
Ae11.lca DAlv& wi..tAout /lai.4ln1 anv- eau4e fo1t alaAm, noA 4oe. Aen4e
o/ U4fe.Jl.cv?
bv
Alm
a paAked ve.hlcle ju,t be~ond neaA cuAve. Lagln.i ln walt th.at cold
daAk Tue.4.aa, nlte app1toacnln~ tAe. ' ' o'clock nou4 wi.tA lt4. en1lne
/oA ,l~aL
looklni ln. dl11.e.ctlon o/ hl4 hoae ,oon ca,ae. lnto vl,euo Aou4e. 14
po11.ch-Llte ,Ai..nnln1 b11.L1h~L1 4llLa11. to that of a 4&aaan'4 ,ho11.e
Ae tAi.nkln.1,
4ee-
e.xt4a
01t W44
Ae ~evlewln.i ln
hi.4 mlnd once mo~e iatlte.4lAJ ltl4 wok-da.,'4 tnouiAtA a/te.tt. ttt.nln.~ of/ vaAlcle.
e.n1lne.?
tA~
la., lt
pak,
V/1,)at wel(.e hLt. tltou.1J,.t4 u.ac:lti.n.J /04 ve.lti.. c.l..e. '4 ln.tulo1t. dootr.
han.dle. to ope.n., 4n.J whlle. exltln~ 4tandln.f u.p4l1ht tho4.e fe.w un-
hea4d a Loud 1&l.l /011. hlA wlle. fUlcklv the11.eafte.11. ln Au.ch a ,ound
Ahe. hoLte.d to dooa11. open.ln1
to
Ai.4
dlein~.
411.a.t
vle.111 without eve11. 4pea.kln.i Au11.11.oundLd 61 ,Aotiun 1 A pelleted emhe.dd.e.J. wall.. 9an.a.u.a~v JI, 1978, Tu.u.dav- app1toxi.m.a.te.lv 10:40 'P/11
f/lli.at di..d lte. know?
IJ/lzat/111/to
1.1144
...
lte. lnve.4tl.-
Fo4 pa4t 27 ge.a11.4 who ha4 e.ven 11.eaLLv ca11.e.d, and ~A!J- not the.g?
N~co~lc 4 DLte.c~lve. S~11.,e.ant
ALhLa-a.. H
~~--
& W44 . ,
f~le.n.Jf
/!11/atizo,.a6Le
ttnv,
1&1tl.t1u4LJI
!i&1t.
401111
j_
a4J
Aa, ..
elo4u1t~ tAi.44
c.AtLd'
r.1othu, .._
n.&1114i
tttu4.t-
/i..n.il ,cuol.ve.
44:e ~~tu~tt
ca..u.J 1//e.c.t.eA
1111.
a.11."'
e,c.
~~C~4~n ~4~A4ln~l~~, ?J
t<1'!..1ta.,~iu
~!~44
1~t.Ule.1 an,.J
t7ttl/l..-'l!.1te.~ 11.K11.cu
fi-1,
t,Hu ~'luri.L
t.e,,. .f.?... ,.
/f:4 .1.8.
6v i'""' o//lc.u,
s~-,e~nt R~b~,t
u~ll.~4olv~1.
tit.ic::C:.e Pa,111..~u 6ot.~ IJ ,A.l.;la 4C.lt1Jol
ll.on 4 t.J,J,Lrt.,
6 p-eu4
u,&,,'-4.tJll/~:I.
fa~llt
pt.1.11.?.rt.t.a i&r1i1
Jac4,on 1 4 wLJow
4~J
~Alld(&n
~nJ too
adeitci}.~'t.~.~~.,: 11._;,t.lia
/
I
'i+P tittul).j~
'
,,;i
,I
'I
.-
lnve.4ti, 7 ati.o,1.I
/;;,'LL
" "~l [ l..r.tflH.
, w. :J,1-e !.
11t
l' . UJL
~nJ
!I"""'
Lrat.c.o.4t?
t, '"''
;L.t
111/,,l.L 11111r1Lt ..
,,,.,.J.,
,,., wL~A
ko? 11~/ p,&1&4 tne,'lL 4.00~ /LAJ .-..olvc
~1 A~ve. clo,uc tALt cnlld', ,af& 1ttu1tn.
C4~cu1ut.a,u:u. ~t11u.011ra.r!Ln1
t...
ca,u. ""i.f"" 4n.,/ co"'"'"tt." a.lL t1vU1J.b.!e u:pe1&tL& ""' ~011 ,~a"&
~e.1ua,ta~. botha.n !~1l& 1t.<tJJipt1p& 9ulv OR, 2005 1 nit, the da14
corr.tlnK& t~
CUU&tlt
r ~ ., ..
p11441
6.c~e Lnc1&&4.a.ln,i,
COAC&44&d
p1uHeLp<1.1Lt
aA/lC.4.~
tht t~~
"S1t.,u.l..d
Ln.ll'lt.~
n. 111'i,OLfl~- Ln.11u.ti.~4ti.;Jf!
f ,a
e1,ue.4 un.11uol11,1,I
~"111,,
cuts
v1.a.1t.
ti4.44.&.&i.11atf.,i
~~zf~
//~1.. I).
,
'
1tl.11.a.,-4
'lllJ.I.
C:,i wn..11111~
r~wlfn,.
lo
i1
.a.<11u.
C'llftflll-44l-,ru..
~~
~ '
i 4 ~e~~
~
T
an, ~tt~4nc1 h~ londc4bL~
1~,"~
J,
l,
]6116
e.a,1
It
L~
l&&~tJllab.l&
.,;;i
m14te11.lou4
po.&Lti..01&4
di..a.appca11.~nc~ o/ ALaba
lie. m:oie.
t,~u-t. fi,1
11.etu11.n ho,& 1 ,~d cL04u11.e4 /11.om tlr.i. 1tlJhtmczA&l4h &v~nt ~4& da4.e.4~Llli'o/
' ~I
aLL FBI
and
~4eti
,~'r,w Mtudl.n.9.
pa.ica.n.t.1 1
,,allli.4v,
Lnve4ti.jati..ve
4f..4.0ult~&4.
.tev&U.Jr.CIJ,
/011.
n4.
4.!Vllo&
'
HoLLow'l./
4
i.4te11t!.4t, c:on-
C?.t/14 1
.Se.44C:.o,u, ala, wi..tlr. ~ove,1no.t 8ob 'hll.e..11- wla1J luu too 6u.,i con:t.a.ctll.d c.a.l.1\
1
i..n.,,~ lo1t f&J 4 .'&qua../. pcutlc.i.paf.i.o,i.4 e:cl.a.tl.n.J. t.tR.i.fU& Un.C.ORll:101&1.tt UllU,ufve.J
.Stat,z. ol
' Alt&6f.lllla. e4,4~,1,, a.LL lea.11ln.a.
, on.,z. cor.amc,n de.nomi..n.a.to1t 1 /.QJJJ ur./o,1c.uz~nt..
1
1\ :.tn:cotlc, /JO!!.tttlv& Sug.e.a.n.t "l'r1Li.ce. r>//i.cu. 7?ooe4t Pa.clu.on. tU..4a.44i.lltite.J 26
.;:,~cu4 a;a
bot.it ll,
,,
,J.i...,d
'
1.0UJl~
'I
fl/4.
W44
/e.l.LoUJ poLi.ce.
4U4{'i.<!t.OU,4 C:LllCU!IU.tiz.nc4c.,
71taci..a
i.&r&d,
/fi 1
"//i..c.e.1&
Ha.111.Le.tt.
fl&a.1&4
a.~o.
;,,l'4V
t.?.-1ti.-
/ Q.lll.i.L, 4half. ln.,; r:.n. I, t.n. tit n.d J.lt OU/ e,i
'.
911.l1 /] 1 200$
Tlt'f. i!an.qca.61.a. l4L ~1&1&. S,.ltlt
.St~t~ S&1i~to, St&t& ot ~La6--.
. '
'.1e. U-f~~t
' ....
1oa.
:uid C0aatt4Lct , ..... Llit~--~t, cncac"-1; Clld co-,44~~-n.,& ,n... oi~,4~ ike
M,.
,a./
a11..,1t.0111tdi.1tf
la.~l&& l~LLa1,
G4d
11.s,e,1:!4 tli.t1pf'&~1u1.Act. 4/
~oo
.~u llla&e.
CJ4nd.
tt~Qt
~
Ala6a.a:i t4,.:.~-
fl11.t.'/llU.UI.
tAu.c. cit.ta."~
tALen.
it&t~n
A-
Sutoc ~SA-.lh1'" u..Juv-ttlf..t "" ... n.~t.uu.t.lt.v CJ1.li.i1.ti.n.p. 4r,rpp~1t.t f1t.o,11. a!l.
rH<%6"4L'IZll4J ~n.1t/;ue
I/JC,
1Hk
su.at~
.S.Jigl,/,g
UitO'C:t!j
.o~i,.:ie.., Lllu.1.ii,.,1.f!. ou.- tuut n.11U.f Lt:.flll.01t,a of r,ov-u,.,.11: 9,,1, ?i.J.&fi- 1 flcpu.
,uJttatLve , ....., ., .... ~ti!, a.tt4 11.s. S&1t11to11
le/I
f ";,..,,cJ4
1011.
l\rJ/l)
1te.'la~4,t.
c11pc44.:,1t
'
'f_,'J!.,
, .,
1 ,
9/ .,i1,coti.c4 ,/c.ta.eUv!t.
Siit ..
!;'l
/jjy:(iff,,,._,,it44rtef/-,
..,ryt7,,., 1./U.,,,
._;-~''l,.'3. '-'
C,4,4,C.(.(.,
i:i .. .aa.4.a.!n."Ctl.01&
,,
i,O" ~ ot~&4
t:<1.,
~
ol
f u.
l '"
11
!"'2.i!J. : .....
4"tl,..11ti.011,?
-2.J1C,!
rJ/llO
.:'!4<'1J."lie7
r1/
!:h;,u.
ilUAplei.au,L;. l.n
'llu.19 cct.lll1
<tllOl!~U.!:.d:
....... '..
... .
..,
- '-- .
. .. .
..
, '
..
'
..
Re: Re.;eJection CDmJmign Advertising's Content; Being Here. Listening, and Helping
Dear Senator Shelby:
Thank you for your annual visit this past week ago to our Circle City, Dothan~
realizing how your schedule, especially during latter part of the week is full and
demanding, anxious to return to your family and friends is most applaudable. Although
the time set aside for our having anticipated attending your speaking engagement here
was required of altering, and subsequently thereafter missed you before your leaving.
Irregardless of aforementioned, it had been genuinely hope that while here your
schedule had been planned out far enough in advance to be flexible enough to, if not at
surely visit, at a minimwn to have had at least telephoned the widow, Ms. BilUe Jackson;
of this citfs, black, shotgun assassinated at near point blank range City of Dothan Police
Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson. He was my friend, fellow police patrol officer.
Very long overdue is the resolving his case, closure for his widow and family.
Senator Shelby. you may remember our having exchanged correspondences during the
tragic aftennath involving the disappearance of Birmingham, Alabama high school
graduate teenager Ms. Natalie Holloway in A.tuba. A tragedy too that remains unresolved
today; that you may also remember that you, your office, called for, encouraged the F.B.I.
to go and render assistance to Arubian investigators, likewise your public position
pertaining to such a sensitive issue was echoed by this state's then current governor,
Governor Bob Riley.
l mention these things as a preface to following: Police Officer Robert Jackson was
shotgunned down during a January 31st moonless, cold, rain drizzling night in front of his
residence getting out of his police car with his wife and two small children inside their
home awaiting his return home from work. Hardly a day goes by now that other states are
commonly witnessed by mainstream and cable news honoring present--day shot/killed
police officers. Yet, this state has never recognized and honored with equal enthusiasm,
which should have been witnessed by other states involving this officer's widow;
SffOULD, NOW RISE TO A LEVEL OF YOUR OFFICE'S IMMJ;:DIATE CONCEB!S,
TO BE lN CONCERT WITH YOUR RE-EL~CTIQN CAMPAIGN ADVERTIZING'S
KEY WORDS, HELP AND NEED. This officer was drafted, he volunteered for service,
serving four yeliU' tour of duty, a Vietnam War vetenm, Honorably Discharged, returning
home to become a police officer is deserving of more respect from his aovemment than
him, his widow/family ever received. IS HE DUE ANY LESS. THAN OTHER STATE?
I have been for a longtime, years, respectfully seeking to have Governors Riley and
Bentley extend this state's compassion and goodwill to this officer's widow; without
success; not even a call or letter, much less a personal visit. Many times I have sought
after this state's govemor, Governor Robert Bentley preparing a bill for presentation
before the legislature for their approval: Governor George C. Wallace signed a
proclamation for a $10,000.00 reward, never been any movement on all during these
years; that the state move to convert such proclamation's title to an act of compassion's
title in memory of Officer Jackson, since his case will never be solved!
Senator Shelby sir, do you not agree, it is way past time that this police officer, as
if he were an officer in any other state be given his equal and legal resolution's closure, if
not for him; at minimwn for his widow, his son Robert, Jr. and daughter?
Thanki
you in advance I am
hlerii~~
I )
John Carroll
The Henry County Reporter
Post Office Box 2
Abbeville, Alabama 36310
John, this being another presidential debate day's night has drawn me to reflect on my
notes from when we last spoke on the phone, about 1 pm early afternoon of the 2nd
scheduled debate. During that phone conversation you told me that either you had been.
or were in a meeting with someone and was retwning my call to you from earlier in day.
That you had a hot Jead on someone who may have been a on the scene '"crime scene"
witness where girls murdered was last thing you told me.
Then, during your return call to me, you told me that. yes, you were coming by after
getting through with whatever it was you were doing, would be maybe about 4:00 p.m. to
which I obviously said fine. That phone call was the Jast time speaking with you, even
after having my calling and leaving messages over next couple, three, of days ~thout
having ever heard back from you. Then, in response to my last left mesmtge, when you do
call back telling me that you have been cow shopping, and that I should fish or cut bait
was rude and unbecoming what I believed the caJiber of your pen;ona. Had you appeared
as you had said you were, you would have been hen: to participate in a Conference Call;
but you were a no show that I had to make an excuse for after planning on your being
here. not by guessing .................. no, as direct result of your own word.
John, you may take such as insignificant, I place a lot of confidence in the honoring of
another's word, in return their being responsible for only doing no more no less than what
it is that they themselves have told me they were going to do. Seen this day and time as
minute, was a part of the way I was raised from childhood, as well too strive to treat
others as I would want them to ~ t me, and I have, as best I could, but of course like
anything else, there has been exceptions; and that when J told someone something that
was going to cause them to make dccision[s] based on what I told them, thetefore I
became duty bound and obligated to them first and foremost into that day, evening, night,
week, month.. . . . . . . . .that is to say, unless, should, in the event I saw ch'cumstances
arising far enough beforehand, whereby dictating that I postpone any agreed upon
meeting or obligation; here again I was duty boood/obligated tO notify other either that l
was not coming, or that I was running late, exact time unknown, others should make their
own plans accordingly; therefore not leavins them standing alone alongside the street
curb looking up the street to see if l wus next vehicle comin&,
We first began building upon our confidential, exposing corruption, relationship when I
told you of my need for someone to help me in the editina of a book Mitten, but since
stroke was havine difficult time organizing materials Mitten for editing. You 1old me of
knowing a lady from Australia that you could contact who was well versed in editing. I
invited you to my home, we sat on front porch, you wanted to make an audio of our
conversation, I ae,eed J trusted you, only before your using audio tape's content that I
------ --------------.------- ..
.....
wanted a dubbins of conversation's entirety for transcribing onto paper for my reading;
after all since my having been fallen by disabling stroke as I had told you I had a concern
about my verbalizing skills, therefore seeldng BCCUl'tlC)'. To this day you have yet to bring
or send the audio's copy which we have both agreed upon, even witnessed by the lady
having joined in the conversation. True you brought me a pink thing, I had no use for
since I had no way of using it to really know what its content contained.
Then after further discussions we moved on into the arena of special HBO productions to
get coverage; then lastly you were talking about doing articles yourself leadin& off with
my friend Jackson's assassination. Then you decided be best to go with the prls stories.
So John really I don't know what direction the original goal moved in; I was supporting
your suggestions in obtaining end results.
John, l realize coming from me this is liken to water off a duck's back, an old fan, sitting
at home with a lot of time on his hands; but the reality is in the facts. Since your first visit
to my home you have left me anticipating your coming back to visit my home on no less
than three separate occa..11:ions, when factually you never did on any, and which I consider
wo.rst, the bad manners not bothering to call in advance advising that you wasn't, very
rude and disrespectful, not only involving me, but too of my wife. we could have had
time for other plans maybe. First time I remember well, you decided to go fishing you
said, the next time was about your cows, and nex.t time was that you had just to much to
do at home; and all that's fine, I have never expected my being any priorities in your life,
but I have expected the same respect and courtesies that you yourself respect from others.
Apparently putting us at cross beliefs, but in our own pursuits for righting wrongs; while
I will concede rm sucking flexibility's hind tits, confined to home resulting due to health,
and unable to drive. So good luck. BUT l STILL W!)NT AND EXPECT MY COPY OF
Be
r/1; J'-M'./~
K~s..
Fax(334)460-9706
John:
Possibilities existing in lieu of infonnal meeting that I could give an officially witnessed
and legal deposition; my after thoughts regarding this matter rises specifically due the
fact of my age and health; but primarily anticipation for my considerations of equal and
reasonable potential for my family's future securities resulting from this documentary
project; their personal protections and financial soundness is of my utmost concerning
importance should in the interim I should not survive the full extent net profit gain, the
full and unknown extents of your hard work's documentary's success involving this
area's corruptions paid for on the back of the poor and minorities is surely destined to
become not only a national but internationally acclaimed achievement.
I will lend Wlto YOU my support towards the ac.complishina of your resolve, in further
review of my accumulations, such transfer ofinfonnation will require of you, your time
and patience; having said this; the contributions heretofore for the record will be
rewarding not only for both, you and myself; but even more so for all those having been
victimized, made selective targeting for the violations and/or denials of their basic equaJ
rights.
ntm of last
people"'
"H,~t ail l
,are ab..:iut i;:;. justice and t,a\fe moved thls torward more than
"It I had
not gotten these t,1es out ot ttle country they would be sealecs
l!!P
{I had nothing to do with this bm be the Intermediary.)
"That all I care about is justice and have moved this torward more than
anyone else the past 10 years with exception of Brian Dowling
not gotten tnese t11es out ot the country tnev would be sealed
forever due to a corrupt judge"
"ft I had
"from J"
No doubt, that while in the pursuits for justices, attemptin
to make wrongs righted daily schedules are altered. If I hav
1if !.ETTEJfs.
as_since
'f'M-/V,~1,
l7'5*
~_,I.JjJA.
'D
1',
\r
l;l~UTY V
uT.1,.-n.,_ -
ass Mlam ts tn route to Dothan to cover the OPD andValm.kai.tory. They are sending a fcrmer
Quee11 's proHcutor to Interview tho$e In Oothan. New York CBS sent Miami because it i!t tf'le closest
and thv want to run tlle story tomorrow ev1ming and flip it and cet 60 Minutes involved.
J wants you to get on board with thh and for all to
r::ermlss!On to send CBS news crew to ll'lterview you for the segment. This WIii vindicate you and allow
tne country to see that you are a re~pected former law enforCM1ent offiCf!r who has tried far decades to
fight COITuptlon In \he Southeast.
"l'ou are & VERY IMPORTANT part of t11, Stol\'!
Voor beltt,g interviewed on camera w,11 also be ¬htr way of protecting your safety a5 no one will
tO\lth you after this is released-
Several hundred thounnd people ha11e alre:ady read the lienry County R111port's story.
J wants yo~ to know he know$ who the .shooter Is of Beasley and Hawlett is and the FBI outside of
Alabama has the evidence.
Kate: You know that I support you 100% and appreciate all who
have been, are contributing to bringing closures for so many
too long overdue them.
But, nevertheless, what I have to say must be first under oath
as a matter of official record, in the record; no disrespect
intended, but CBS' interview may, or maynot come full circle;
and what I have to say extends well beyond current discussions
plus, I still maintain an obligation to my word, which involve
four individuals; that CBS would surely want backgrouno on for
verifications any part[sJ of what I will say. Therefore, I
will have to respectfully decline any interview, any authorization releasing subject matterswhich would be contrary to
mind and John's first and original agreement involving same.
Until the u.s.o.o.J. decides the lives and personal sufferings
of these poor and minorities, and select individuals who havin
tried to make wrongs rights are worth either political party's
public liability now, because of having covered up for so long
agrees to go on public record under oath; I have nothing else
to say, for I have been down these roads to many times before
during past 11 years, one might describe them as being "used
and abused" years, wanting me for what I knew, then doing nothing!
I grew up trained into adulthood as to be one who
looked for solutions, not excuses; and that's all I have heard
, excuses, no more, now it's my being under oath and too my
and John's original agreement being hon0red Do tell John it
does appear that he di come for h
th a ood story this time
w o r ~ t w~i~s0t~.-""JZ~
information for him ta meet with you as Friend did not give out your name.
Most likely your residence is under heavy surveillance. Afraid papers may b,a
compromised in your location and it is not safe to ha11e picked up now. Fax all
necessary papers to me for safe keeping. Let me know if the fax needs to run all
night as I Sive you permission to do so; I will move fa)( machine out of bedroom
needed for special project.
Much Jovel
if
-------
--
----------------------------
Jf
.. "
,n,-,i,---.,,o1.. ,
s14-9.1g..14ro....,
l/,
p.:
t,~
de his 2 pagts includq the last orii, wW, Kelth Gray's name a'ld signature.
Please, be readviscd; refer to my responding said fax dated 11/19/2015@ 5:10 p.m.
regarding my properties involving any/all letters, docwnents, or forms for your further
use and/or public referrals too; since date of same fax, 11/19/2015. you have not had, nor
do you now have, or will be authorized for public and/or private use thereof; furthennore,
you are respectfully requested of [via {914} 939-1476] to adhere to instructions per this
fax dated, l l/23/2015i that you have not been, are not now, not in :futW'e, authorized to
make public, and/or duplicate for private gain these {my) various titled personal
documents.
Otherwise, best wishes in your future pursuits for justice.
Ki')thryn
:114-939-1476
P1
J, had a corlferen~ call with Ju.stic:e Dept. l>y an;j through Loretta Lynch and Congressman
Conyers, had of th& House judiciar; committ-.. ldormauon rl!IJardinc Houston Co&Jnty
deaths and eorrupt:on ~all plced dh @~!y irl Conyi:r, hands by a relatlv of his. He WilS furious
that his ards fai\ed to give him th(> info~rnation l)rev ously.
J. understands. yoJ are fru~trated, but he d~snt drive wt1at i.s ongoing with the investlfJatlo11
of the ca~. There Is fl 2 minute window to ~ able to keep someone's attention to set them to
take at:4-:ion be'ure they lose intNest. Interest has bten spari<ed which Is why J. has turned au
his original files over to lawyers ir1 Justice Cept. in Washiri~n.
J. re-cehied almost 11< file; ot E.XTREMEL"t c.onfidel'ltlal docume'lt, last we.I< frcm a11 in,lde
so..1rce which show a c!ear link In the cleath/rnurdf'r of 8rian Oowllng and corruption. The
lewvers in D.C will be runningthlsuain, notJ ardthe evidence m1Jtt flt ii formatthat wlll set
traction. J. hash.ad other sources pro'IJlding e,11idence corroborating VoUr evidence, but he
thinks vou m11y have other things in yoor filtis which miet,t amplify the cas~.
J war,ts to know what the mdictmen1s you gave him from 1 ~ mean; for example (against
Kenneth Jackson).
J, said if you want to bt port of the )Oh.Jtion eve -yone needs tc work together for thi! common
cause and put aside all d:fferences tc move fight th cover-up of co,ruptlOn.
He said you were l00% correct NO ONE in Alabama can be trusted and Sessions is a HUGE
obstacle in O.C. but tliey have successfully receivttd rooperation from his P011tical eremies. In
addition; yourtheory on Clinton wa.i Hspot on".
If you want to help In ~topping what has been ong.l.')ins fot decacles, the jvrtice Dept. meed~
copies of your files. J. said he wilt help you get someone to work on a booldor you after the
pro,ecution is In proces.'i by the DOJ. Fer now, the emphasis Js gett 1ns $0rtlet"hlns done during
this limit~ tlme wh.-11 the window ,s open In D.C.. The h~lp to ftght what has permeated
Houston C.:iunty tan not be with attached condltions.
we an understand vou are wearv of tht fight yo1,; have fou,ht 8'one
your life ana health for ovet 3 decadts, but now is the tlm1 to take action. Let someone else
;n;:.lst In pushlnc thi-s thmugh to fruition to expos.e what was done tu Srit1n, Jennifu and other..
He c1n have sornecme securely pick up your files within 20 minutes if you ate willin& to heip
J~db~~:#J,7~~_1
~
i'l~~;:z--
~~4'~
~~
..cl'V~
&-i.~ x~
N- !f-4
~~~
/L',
q.,....;;r.;. ~ __r..(,..,.,......,
~'-~1::1
~~;;;::...J,d~.,,t'~......,,.(
,.J...u-.. ,r..{~
A~ t1k
111'4(~~
bo.,(,1\.# -i.,.u,,.
~eA~
~-~. ~
.,.,,,
~/11,'r""
I\._,,, ,...J,....
JON B. CARROLL,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN WHITE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
For good cause shown, it is ORDERED that, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 636, this case is referred to the United
States
Magistrate
Judge
for
consideration
and
knowing of these issues, or any others. Most assuredly, and definitely, although beyond
the scope of this court's jurisdiction there does exist within federal guidelines provisions
paralleling: "Cullen vs. Flieger 18 F. 2d flwc1 U.S. Clmtit) 1994; "The fedet'al court. will
intervene, despite pending state proceeding, where the state prosecution; or proceedings
has been brought to retaliate for or to deter Constitutionally protected conduct or where a
prosecution or proceeding is otherwise brought in bad faith or for the purpose to harass."
"A showing of retaliatory or bad faith prosecution establishes irreparable injury for the
purpose of Younger vs. Harris 401 U.S. 371971 Doctrine. The Plaintiff presented
sufficient evidence to justify federal intervention where he showed that he bead a past
history of personal conflict with the defendants, that he had engaged in protected conduct,
and that the defendant's desire "to do something about him rose to the "level of animus".
Th.is retired school teacher, myself, retired disabled serviceman, selfcrnployed
individual. everyday individuals, members of this activist group at sometime during years
1996~2002 were arrested and/or physically assaulted with il'\iwies; myself arrested seven
times, and jailed four as ways and means to silence me; overheard via cracked opened
she said. They feel they'll make someone otad or that they'll lose their jobs, she said.
It's like they live in fear.'' Excerpts for Danville Register and Bee newspaper's reporter
Scott Deacle December 1999 sentdown from Danville Register and Bee newspaper for
their January 2000 editions after then Dothan City Manager Jerry Gwaltney had sneaked
off to Virginia for a new City Manager's job approval in November, curiously risht after
getting a lucrative new September 1999 resigning annual contract; for turning in his
Dothan's official notice early December 1999 to depart.
Because of what Mr. Carroll had perceived would be a further and quick access to
over hundreds of other pages failed in that decision by blogging out to the public minimal
pages having obtained without permission, and apparently not only from this petitioner.
ht now an election year, state and national, the unlawful and illegal government
corruptions born out of these issues destined to surface, are of the people's interest; rises
to levels of Watergate; but tragically far ascends 1973 Watergate: ''l don't give a shit
what happens, I want you all to stonewall it, let them plead the fifth amendment, cover
up or anything else if it'll ....... save the plan. Nixon dete.-mined to ..Stonewall"
it. fearing that the truth about Watttgate could lead to the exposure of the previous
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..
illegalities sanctioned by the White House. The cover up is the main ingredient, he
said; that's where we gotta cut our losses." President Richard M. Nixon to his aides,
secret audio tapes subpoenaed before the Senate Judiciary Committee May 22, 1973.
But now before this Honorable Court is U.S.C. 18 l 9S8 Traveling Act: "Murder
For Hire"; assassination Dothan police officer Robert Jackson; transport and distributions
of illegal drugs from south Florida and Central America's Belize, corrupt government
rising to levels of R.I.CO.; and if for no other :reason[s] demands of this court and its
authorities to stand finn their oaths to office. commit to duties, fulfilling their obligations
to those having paid with their last full measures in attelJlpting to do theirs. such as police
officers Robert Jackson, Robert Hawlett, Harold Locke; attorneys Brian Dowling,
Jennifer Atwell, and retired school teacher Shirley Dahl. and others all my friends having
endured physical and emotional injuries thru threats to silence them, what of their rights,
I'm last man standing at age 72, soon 73, within past month diagnosis with accwnulative
heart congestion, records will support my etl'orts since 1997 seeking out justice,
continuously denied, now being blindsided by this plaintiff; I can now only hope that I
can live long enough to see resolved and help contribute to the welfares of all those
originally intended to so.
As first stated, I have as of late this afternoon received your package and will move
to review as I await per your instructions from the court what to anticipate. Respectfully
Most sincerely,
2 3 Glasgow Drive
than, Alabama 3630 I
Postscript: Johanna, I use U.S. Attorney's fax number since Federal Clerk's office
does not receive by fax, only e-mail; and I do not have immediate access for that type
communicating. Trusting I understood you correctly in that you said that submitting letter
would suffice at this time, although I didn't anticipate this other blogging news today,
why again this letter; I now await you, your office's response, thank you.
Have you ever purposefully took the time to stop, stand, or sit still long enough to really
focus on our nation's flag. given thoughts lo what she represenls, given a silent
acknowledgement to those having fallen and alive in the defense ofher still today
continuing to fly <JVer our nation as she ever goes so gently back and forth unfurling her
red and white bars sometimes with a fluttering snapping while at the same time a dark
field of blue atop in her left comer noticeably displaying 50 individual white stars, each
one representing their own individual and independent state of the total United States; all
fonned, made, and compromising of and for "We the people ofthe United States", that
"we hold these truths to be self~evident, that all men are created equal." Representative
John Hancock (Merchant; Qu1ncy, Massachusetts] President of the United States in
General Congress assembled; July 04th. 1776!'
Dothan Businesswoman, "many people [here] are afraid to criticize the local [Dothan]
government, she said. They feel they'll make someone mad, or lose their jobs ..... she said.
It's like they live in fear." Excerpts from Danville Register and Bee Newspaper's
reporter Scott DeacJe>s interview with Dothan resident during visit City MaJlilger's 1999
December's resignation after just signing in September 1999 lucrative contract renewal.
Dothan Businessman, ..Shut him up, do something to shut him up; to discredit him so
others won't believe what be is saying, but do something to shut him up." Afterwards
from out behind an already partially cracked open City,Manager's/Mayor's
Administrative Office's door out walked to police officers. Media authority.
Then, Assistant City Prosecutor, Ms. Kalia Spears Lane, "A black female having been
promised by the City Manager the opening vacancy for Municipal Judge, having already
been made public, brought before the Commissioners; was later summoned to meet with
the Police Chief, John White, in his Dothan police cruiser. Lane was told during that
meeting with the police chief that she would not begetting the position wider any
circumstances. Lane was told that the media was ready to explode with the story, that it
would get ugly, but when it was all said and done that "the shit would stick to her".
Excerpt from federal complaint affidavit CVOO-M-1096-S, subject IV. Facts, item 19.
Then Police Captain Jim Smith, A 20 year veteran, fired for allegedly being the author of
unsigned letters [although never proven] even though Police Chief John White
employed Houston County Commission Chinnan Mark Culver to call Smith
attempting to move conversation in a way while secretly audio taping him for the chief to
admit his participation(s], but obviously without results that he had ever engaged in letter
writing campaign criticizing Police Chief John White and/or police staff upper
management. Excerpt Dothan Eagle Newspaper December arowid/about 2003. Such an
action lending serious arguments supponing Businesswoman 1s interview to Danville
Register and Bee proving to public the (her) "acid test"; "or that if tho dQ, S!ltt:JI
._
......-. .~
....,____.......-...........;.........,.__;_. ~ - . -
.
.
.
,- - ...... '!:; ''"". 'j
....----.--- . . . . . . . . :. .:-. . :":'":~-- - -.--... ---. - ~~-- -:--,.~\.
:
i-.'
..
. .
:.
...-:
. ...
..
j ,' .....i:
...
...
,..
. ...
.
...: ..:.--:--.--.-~~-::: ..
-.wo--..
~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . --
AprU
i; 2002
C
'd
... , ,
'
Mayor
_, j istr-ict 2 Commissioner
' ~ l:Lff:
~rict 3 Commissioner
~ - - - ----;
..
-~------------
-- - ..---.
April 2, 2002
istr;ct 2 Commissioner
\)
~ tk,.ff
-~trict 3 Commissioner
-------------
------
..
April 2, 2002
... -
"'!!II